women-are-not-public-property

[women-are-not-public-property]

[women-are-not-public-property]

Imagine putting on cat ears and a tail and saying "I'm more of a cat than my cat, because I'm deliberately a feline but he was just born as a feline. My cat outfit cost me $2000, so someone who prefer natural cats are like people who would choose a cheap, free plastic bag over a designer bag. And also, cat lovers find me way cuter." 💅

[women-are-not-public-property]

Tumblr is fucking stupid because a lot of y’all think that white people invented sexism and taught it to men of colour. Lol right okay black and brown women have been treated like shit waaaayy before Cracker Von Patriarch III came along and handed out smallpox and Bibles

[women-are-not-public-property]

recently saw a video on insta where a woman was talking about her acts of micro feminism (shaking hands with both women and men, asking women's opinions first, turning to female specialists). in the comments, men started writing that these were "rather acts of hatred towards men", that is, what men did and continue to do with women is normal, but asking women's opinions first and shaking their hands is hatred? wtf is wrong w men??

[women-are-not-public-property]

I'm sure women enjoy not living their life,they must despise free time,fun,and relaxation..poor men ! Women fool them,deceive them into dull boring marriages and then after women torture men by wearing a hoodie....A HOODIE!!!!!

They must have been promised by their patriarchal gods; a pleasant woman to their eyes,who will never get tired,never worn out,never complain ,inflate his ego unnecessarily like a tire,feed him,take care of him ,wipe his ass while looking like a drag queen ( not a human female )

What a cruelty...

Poor guy,he has to go to bars alone while his wife is at work or on sick leave....what a despicable monster of a women 🙄

This woman must be punished by his consistent absence or divorce ...that's what she deserves for being a responsible adult and wife.

[women-are-not-public-property]

it's insane to me that there are people arguing that jkr is worse than neil gaiman because they believe she contributes to systemic violence while neil gaiman's actions were just an isolated incident. women's words are part of a global conspiracy of violence but a man's violence against women is merely a self-contained interpersonal conflict

[women-are-not-public-property]

amazing radfem talking points happening on the threads app

[women-are-not-public-property]

I've noticed that men usually only see what things are on a very superficial level, and women are able to see not just what they are but what they 𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘯. We see the larger picture, the symbolism that men either can't see or choose to ignore.

For example, when a woman tells her fiance 4,897 times that when they feed each other cake at the wedding, to please not smash the cake all over her face. She couldn't be clearer that this is immensely important to her. He says, "Okay" - and when the time comes he smashes the cake all over her face, guffawing.

Or when a marriage is on the rocks because a wife feels consistently disrespected and unappreciated, and she gives her husband one last chance to demonstrate that he loves her - and she comes home to a trail of rose petals that lead to a sink full of his dirty dishes. And he calls it a joke.

Men in the comments of these videos say things like, "Gosh, if she gets that mad over a little frosting/a joke, he's better off without her!" But women can understand in a flash that of COURSE its not about frosting or a poor joke - because what buffoon would think that? Its about the total disregard for her feelings; the way that all these things say, "You can plead with me about something that's important to you a million times, and I'll deliberately disregard it and laugh in your face about it. Why? 𝘉𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘰𝘯'𝘵 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘦."

And you can't get men to understand any of this. Try it. They'll just say things like, "you obviously can't take a joke just like the other woman here" and eventually trot out some misogynistic slurs. They're literally just not at a level of evolution to understand these things that are so easily grasped by women. As someone once said, "You can't speak butterfly language to caterpillar people."

[women-are-not-public-property]

it’s official that women in the us are not allowed to have a movement of their own, they turned the Women’s March which is a march for women’s rights into the “People’s” march. female oppression isn’t seen as a serious issue for leftists which is why they silence women.

[women-are-not-public-property]

Like fr

[women-are-not-public-property]

fuck nuance. hating men is the morally correct thing to do

[women-are-not-public-property]

^what he said

[women-are-not-public-property]

“Humans are inherently selfish--" Then why do so many cultures value hospitality, to the point of dictating it in their religions? Why is it so common for hosts to offer their visitors their best food, and as much of it as they can? At some point, multiple cultures decided that they knew what it felt like to be alone and vulnerable, and promised each other to never let those who stay with them feel that way. That doesn't sound very "inherently selfish" to me.

[women-are-not-public-property]

puts you underwater. one of them is a serial rapist and groomer one of them tweeted things you disagree with. some of you are not serious people.

[women-are-not-public-property]

terfs are incredible

> “it doesn’t matter if they consented, you’re a bad person if you get off to causing other people pain”

so you agree? you don’t actually care about consent and you just have moral standards for what people do? you don’t think their consent matters because they’re doing something you personally find gross? that’s what you’re saying there?

damn girl hows the christofascism taste

[women-are-not-public-property]

finding out that someone is secretly a pervert is like when the clouds open up and the sun shines so beautifully over the tree tops and warms your skin

[women-are-not-public-property]

It's very interesting to listen to history lectures that first say that there was no slavery at a certain period of time, and then follow it up with something like: "women didn't have the right to marry at their free will, property was passed down from father to son..." and so on.

you are absolutely sure that there was no slavery, right?