She/Her • Aromantic-Asexual and Aegorose • aspec and pride stuff
Last active 2 hours ago
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
I'm reading loveless for the third time and I still go "that's so me !", everytime Georgia goes through the ace confusion.
I love Alice oseman for writing that book(and for all of their books)
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
transhet people are absolutely lovely. straight trans women & straight trans men have a beautiful experience. straight aro and ace people are still queer and live queer lives. straight non binary, genderqueer, gnc, bigender, genderfluid, intersex, two spirit and other queer people are a blessing to our community. any straight queer person belongs, no matter what. cis people can be queer, so can straight people. queer hets belong all the same
3K notes
·
View notes
Text
You should like... Take this epic uquiz.
WOOHOOOO
@epicthemusicalstuff @sloanslone @gigizetz
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
youtube
Today on strange. I went so far down this boyhole I am legally forbidden from disclosing some of what I learned
6K notes
·
View notes
Text
ooooOooOoOoooooOOOOOoooo…. actually….. that character….. doesn’t need to be in a romantic relationship…. to be fulfilled or happy or “well rounded”……. ooooooOoOoOo…. and neither do PEOPLE……
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
I've seen a book with an either Aro, ace or aroace character written by an Asian writer (Not Ann Zhao, nor Angela Chen), pretty sure it was adventure leaning? Not slice of life. Anyone has any idea what this might've been?
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
200 notes
·
View notes
Text
Happy ace week!
In our research on ace history, we came across this article, published in the New York paper the Village Voice in 1971. The article, intended as satire, lamented the difficulties of being an asexual person - "the man or woman with the courage to say the whole sex business leaves them feeling like a limp noodle”, in particular the lack of ace visibility, and the prevalence of sex in media.
Although it was meant as a joke, the article genuinely resonated with some readers, who thanked the paper for raising awareness of ace issues. One reader even reportedly wrote in offering to contribute a weekly ace consciousness-raising column to the paper.
Check out our podcast on this article to learn more!
258 notes
·
View notes
Text
I love women who are unabashedly big.
Women with big laughs, big smiles, big voices, big bodies, and even bigger personalities to match. Women that don’t care if they take up space with long strides and sit with their legs miles apart.
They give big hugs and big kisses, and they have big hearts. Big, proud women are amazing.
148K notes
·
View notes
Text
Please enjoy the EPIC cake my sister and I made for ace week a few years ago! (I wasn't on tumblr at the time but I'm still v proud of this)
Dark chocolate, oreo (bc how else do you make gray appetizing?), white chocolate, and strawberry + some food dye
Yes, we made four (4) cakes, twas insane, and glorious!
304 notes
·
View notes
Text
Happy International Asexuality Day!!! No matter where you are in the world, you are seen, recognized, and loved!
5K notes
·
View notes
Text
“Love doesn’t have to be romantic” and “not everyone has to define their feelings as love” are two ideas that can and should coexist btw. Platonic love, sexual love, familial love, and so on are all just as real as romantic love, but people can feel platonic feelings, sexual feelings, familial feelings, and so on without those feelings being love. Just as relationships can be defined as romantic, platonic, or something else entirely only by the people involved in the relationship, feelings can be defined only by the person experiencing them
346 notes
·
View notes
Text
Loveless aro: I don’t really connect with the idea of love. Due to my personal experiences as an aromantic person, I find it uncomfortable to label what I feel as love, and I find it empowering to reject love altogether as a concept.
Non-loveless person: But don’t you love chicken nuggets? Don’t you love your friends and family? Don’t you love the sun on your face? Don’t you love taking a shit when you have a stomach ache? Why won’t you let me force labels onto you?
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
WHAT IS LOVELESS DOING IN TGE ROMANCE SECTION OF MY LOCAL LIBRARY??
Did the librarian read the first sentence of the blurb and go "Yeah, that sounds like a romance," and just decided to put it there?
51 notes
·
View notes
Text
So my school librarians did the same thing (with all of AO’s novels, actually(other than Heartstopper which is in the graphic novel section)) and when I talked to them about it, they said that it was the first genre on the good reads listing that they had in their library. Here’s the genres listed on good reads:
I think it’s bullshit, cause it should definitely be under realistic fiction (along with all AO’s novels (again not heartstopper)), but there’s your reason I guess.
WHAT IS LOVELESS DOING IN TGE ROMANCE SECTION OF MY LOCAL LIBRARY??
Did the librarian read the first sentence of the blurb and go "Yeah, that sounds like a romance," and just decided to put it there?
#alice oseman#loveless#the fact that all the books of an author who focuses so much on platonic relationships are all marked romance#because if side plots#(and sometimes the story wouldn’t be changed at all if the romantic side relationships were platonic)#makes me sooo mad#yeah I told my librarians “that people would have the wrong expectations going into reading it#and they basically said no they won’t and it doesn’t matter#UGHHHH#AO deserves better#ASPECS deserve better
51 notes
·
View notes