vipitis

[vipitis]

[vipitis]

the next conclave is going to be called 2 con 2 clave and they have to elect 2 popes

[vipitis]

i make a mean soup

[vipitis]

finding enough plastic in human brains to make a spoon is certainly a shocking headline but I just don't have it in me to be shocked anymore. not only can I see the evidence of spoon brain all around me I can literally feel it in myself

[vipitis]

biting your forehead friday

[vipitis]

In regards of the Trump government scraping all trans inclusion in its queer information portion of its websites I have made this thing. Spread the word. Don't let them pretend we never existed.

P.S: Don't like! Reblog! <3

[vipitis]

I have to upload this as a video bc you can see her think this in real time

[vipitis]

AfD Werbung bei uns im Briefkasten...

Vorderseite + Rückseite:

Gegen das Licht gehalten:

Kann man sich nicht ausdenken

[vipitis]

new eevee evolution called ibuprofeon

[vipitis]

i just like the idea that the different versions would get along </3

[vipitis]

[vipitis]

Queued right up for it

[vipitis]

[vipitis]

Thinking about the countless times art and music and cinema and literature have saved and comforted me during difficult times i really owe my happiness to everyone dedicated to their craft

[vipitis]

how do i get out

[vipitis]

easily one of my favourite tweets of all time

[vipitis]

There’s a scientific journal called “Get me off Your Fucking Mailing List”.

In 2005, computer scientists David Mazières and Eddie Kohler created this highly profane ten-page paper as a joke, to send in replying to unwanted conference invitations. It literally just contains that seven-word phrase over and over, along with a nice flow chart and scatter-plot graph.

An Australian computer scientist named Peter Vamplew sent it to the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology in response to spam from the journal. Apparently, he thought the editors might simply open and read it.

Instead, they automatically accepted the paper — with an anonymous reviewer rating it as “excellent” — and requested a fee of $150. While this incident is pretty hilarious, it’s a sign of a bigger problem in science publishing. This journal is one of many online-only, for-profit operations that take advantage of inexperienced researchers under pressure to publish their work in any outlet that seems superficially legitimate.