toolusingmammalgirl

[toolusingmammalgirl]

[toolusingmammalgirl]

[toolusingmammalgirl]

does BB from the Of The Killer series have a Ryu number?

BB does not have a Ryu Number.

[toolusingmammalgirl]

Good luck final girl

(full render commission for @frogdor.bsky.social!)

(underscores - Good luck final girl)

[toolusingmammalgirl]

woke m&m's (repost)

[toolusingmammalgirl]

behemoths like homestuck and undertale and seven universe and worm have given me really miscalbrated expectations of the ammount of fanart one ought to expect from the average fandom.

is always a bad sign when i search for it and the drawing i myself posted in the last week are amongst the first five results

[toolusingmammalgirl]

hi gusy im a month late to learning about this musics video. #herbals

[toolusingmammalgirl]

Stellaris wiki talking like my brain when I forget my meds 2 days in a row

[toolusingmammalgirl]

website

essentially finished, most of my art is on here. pay a visit!

[toolusingmammalgirl]

teto based on the background girl wearing "FUCK" shirt from kof2002 unlimited match who looks like teto

[toolusingmammalgirl]

Random headcanon: the reason that Peach and Bowser don’t seem to get a lot of respect in some Super Mario games is because the Mushroom Kingdom is kind of a rural backwater and isn’t terribly important or influential politically, so people tend to regard Bowser as a C-list villain for being so hung up on such an insignificant conquest. Nobody really expects Bowser to be a serious threat – that would be like expecting a guy whose main claim to fame is repeatedly failing to conquer Wyoming to be a serious threat – so they get taken by surprise every single time.

[toolusingmammalgirl]

How do you feel about the idea of gay couples "pushing sexuality" when hetetonorativity meant that we had to reacted to straight couples only ipeven if we weren't completly straight. Why should we be only allowed to relate to one idea of sexual presentation? They think it's pushing an ideology, but would it be fairer to say that it's fighting against a doubke standard?

Originally, this was going to be a very brief post; I agree with the thrust of what you're talking about re: depictions of gay couples in the media, because everyone on Tumblr who isn't part of one of the weirdo reactionary circles believes some variant of that, it's 2025. The rest of the post was going to be me expressing confusion regarding the specific exigence of this ask, like why you chose to ask me in particular this question now in particular. But there's an element of your wording in the back half that I'd like to unpack a little more, because it touches on the core of how I conceive of issues like this: I think the distinction between "pushing an ideology" and "fighting against a double standard" is arbitrary and ultimately basically entirely down to who's currently got control of the framing. I firmly believe that "Fighting a double standard" as you've described it is the same thing as "pushing an ideology," it's just that by doing so you're pushing an ideology that I agree with, making normative claims about how the world ought to be that I agree with. (You can't claim with a straight face, for example, that Steven Universe wasn't advancing a normative argument about how the world ought to be with the specific way in which it handled its queer themes, and you'd look silly if you tried.) The actual slight of hand with the conservative framing is not that it falsely accuses progressives of having an ideology, it's that it's designed to frame ideology only as something that other people have-their own ideology they consciously or unconsciously render invisible, via framing it as "what's natural" or "common sense" or whatever. Fish who don't know that they're wet, sometimes deliberately.

I frequently encounter progressive rhetoric that, in response, attempts to usurp that unquestioned "common sense" status ("We don't have an ideology, we have empathy! Basic human decency!") and I think there are situations where that can be rhetorically effective- particularly in situations where a progressive stance can be backed up by existing commonplace moral frameworks like "live and let live" or "treat others how you would want to be treated" and so on. But I also don't think that it's actually true, and I think it can unintentionally cede ground by validating the conservative attempt to make "ideology" a dirty word. It's ideology all the way down, and I think it's better to render your opponent's ideology legible and force them to defend it on its own merits (which they usually can't) rather than to lie and claim that you don't have one either. Otherwise I think you run the risk of siloing yourself in a bubble where your positions are taken for granted, your understanding of the general principles that your progressive stances are supposed to be based on gets eroded, and you have bad theory of mind for why your enemies believe what they do instead of the Self-Evidently-True Things that you believe. And having good theory of mind for your enemies is important if you want to effectively grind the bastards into the dirt!

[toolusingmammalgirl]

If you defeat Killer Mike first, EL-P gains strength. If you defeat EL-P first, Killer Mike gains EL-P's swiftness and lightning abilities.

[toolusingmammalgirl]

[toolusingmammalgirl]

Dear Sirs.

SCP-682's powers are metatextual. He's unkillable because the story says he is nearly unkillable and no solution would be satisfying. His nickname is 'the very hard to destroy reptile' for rigour's sake. You don't have to be Grant Morrison to put this together.

The solution is to alter the narrative so that there is a means of killing him that is satisfying. Unfortunately, only full-on apocalypse scenarios or the use of SCP-682 as a jobber for an even worse threat would fill that criteria.

So unless you want to unleash something even more tiresome, like the Black Moon or the Scarlet King or the Yellow Submarine or whatever other color-coded doomsday monster you have on tap, you're just wasting jumpsuit filling doing anything at all.

The easy alternative is to simply stop trying to kill him.

Just focus on holding him in the most boring, routine ways possible, rendering him increasingly less interesting and thus reducing the time between stories focused on him and thus, the resulting breaches and disasters.

Or you can do what we did. If you aren't chicken.

Ours wasn't a rotted lizard. It was a sort of mummified horse the size of a 1996 Volkswagen Harlequin, and it was a she, but otherwise same deal. Regeneration. Vat of acid. Mass casualties. Violent opposition to the use of breath mints. Endemic to all life. Po-tay-to, po-tah-to.

We figured out the how it worked, and we speed-ran the whole concept, hurling that vile beast through a veritable plinko-fall of thousands of extermination tests and controlled rampages until there was literally nothing left to do with the 'More-Than-One-Way-to-Fail-to-Kill-a Horse'.

And we trust the populace enough to not lie to them for 'their own good'. Because its funny? Sure. Profitable? Absolutely (don't worry, shareholders!)! But never for 'their own good.'

So we turned those experiments into a 17 season reality television program hosted by Greg Kinnear and force-fed them to a sludge-hungry populace.

There were 'More-Than-One-Way-to-Fail-to-Kill-a Horse' calendars, coffee mugs, t-shirts, two different animated spin-offs running at the same time for some reason, four movies starring Chris Pratt as the voice of the horse, an ongoing sketch on Late Night with Conan O'Brien, 'More-Than-One-Way-to-Fail-to-Kill-a Horse' "acid bath" sour candy flavored yogurt in a tube, a series of increasingly inadequately playtested gameboy cartridges, a 27-issue limited series from Image comics, and adorable plush mummified murder-horse plushes with little suction cups on their red-felt hooves so they can stare balefully out the back of your station wagon at that ASSHOLE Kevin in his souped up Trans AM who does not understand the concept of a safe following distance, and you JUST want to run him off the road with the magno-lifters and recreate the scene from Lost Highway with Robert Loggia, but "you can't use the magno-lifters for revenge" because it's "against OSHA regulations" and "technically assault!"

And once the first shipment of 'More-Than-One-Way-to-Fail-to-Kill-a Horse' Funko Pops hit store shelves, the creature's cultural cache cratered so hard that it became a parody of itself so predictable it's "containment" is now a Universal Studios attraction with two failed executions and a containment breach each night, with double shows on Saturdays.

Now, it was a rocky ride getting there, especially for Utah (projections say you'll get those House seats back in two, maybe three, generations at most, don't you worry!) but we've proven that even if it isn't killable, you can, in fact, beat a dead horse.

Hope this helps.

Humbert, Outreach Liaison Melinoë Laboratories "Hoc non veniet ad nos mordax"

[toolusingmammalgirl]

In Blood Meridian by New York Times bestselling author Cormac McCarthy, the Kid is a chaotic bisexual disaster with a big dream: to make this the queerest Mexican-American War ever. Just one problem: an asexual, certified DILF named Judge Holden. The 25th anniversary edition of Blood Meridian is a whole 351 pages of steamy will-they-won't-they enemies-to-lovers goodness.

Learn more

[toolusingmammalgirl]

I tend to go with "everybody's paradise is somebody else's Hell, and the walls are breaking down"

What sort of webcomics do you keep in that drawer?

There's this one theyre calling FEECH. its like this:

what sort of webcomic is it? well let me give you one word... GAMER. stick that in your pipe and smipe it.

.......I should probably start trying to write pitches for this comic that aren't shitposts, one of these days.