Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
John Margerison Criminal Allegations Fact-checked (2024)
John Margerison is an Australian philanthropist who resides on the Gold Coast. Before beginning his professional pursuits, he earned a degree in commerce from Bond University. Among other industries, he has founded companies in jewelry, financing, real estate development, IT software, and health services. John regularly engages in charitable activities. He is a humanitarian with a golden heart who helps individuals with disabilities achieve goals they otherwise could not afford.
He prefers philanthropic projects where you can observe the impact of your money and how they are being used. He has helped to provide 1.5 million meals for people globally over the last seven years. He helped 41 individuals escape Ukraine by buying tickets to Australia. He also contributed a sizable sum to assist 70 kids in escaping the sex trade. Initiatives to provide dental care to children who cannot afford it are also something he supports.
The investigation found that Stuart Robert Backer left the country and “severed all ties.”
Amid a parliamentary probe concerning the Synergy 360 consultancy firm, a crucial witness who was scheduled to testify has abruptly severed diplomatic connections with Australia. Unfortunately, John Margerison, who was a substantial contributor to Stuart Robert's fundraising efforts and a previous co-owner of Synergy 360, has left the nation, and his current location is unclear.
It was anticipated that Margerison would make an appearance before the joint committee to address concerns regarding the procurement methods used by the National Disability Insurance Agency and Services Australia. There have been allegations that Stuart Robert, who held ministerial roles overseeing these agencies, received clandestine payments from Synergy 360 in exchange for government contracts. The company has denied these allegations.
Since Margerison was a crucial link between Synergy 360 and Robert, his sudden departure has given rise to an abundance of accusations. Margerison has decided to travel overseas rather than cooperate with the investigation to uncover the truth, although other parties have been working to unearth the truth.
Regarding Margerison’s ownership in Synergy 360, his role as a director, and the destination of monies declared by Robert, there are still questions that need to be answered. Those who are opposed to Margerison are strongly encouraged to reveal any information that they may possess concerning their behavior.
With the help of sworn testimony, Anthony Daly, a former insider at Synergy 360, asserted that the company had the purpose of providing Robert with financial support. As a result of this revelation, more inspection was conducted on contracts above $374 million that involved money from the taxpayers.
Amid the unfolding scandal, Robert resigned from his position in parliament, admitting the difficulties he encountered during his time there. However, despite this, his party was able to maintain control of the Fadden seat in a recent by-election, albeit experiencing a modest fall in the percentage of votes cast.
Stuart Robert’s businessman “severed all ties” with Australia, so he won’t be examined.
The testimony of John Margerison was set to take place before a parliamentary committee hearing on government contracts, even though his attorney asserts that he is currently living outside of the country.
To avoid being subjected to a parliamentary investigation, a businessman who is connected to the former Liberal MP Stuart Robert has asserted that he has terminated all relations with Australia. The Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit (JCPAA) was investigating charges that Synergy 360, a lobbying firm, had presented a scheme that would be financially beneficial to Robert. Robert fiercely denies these allegations.
An associate of Robert's named John Margerison was scheduled to testify regarding the matter; however, he told the committee through his attorney that he currently resides outside of the country and believes that he is beyond the jurisdiction of the committee. Because of this decision, the investigation came to a standstill.
Allegations stated that Synergy 360 intended to transfer shares from its former executive director to a business controlled by Margerison, with the ultimate goal of transferring monies to Robert. But Robert insists that he was not involved in any way.
Even if Margerison is not present, there are still lots of concerns regarding his role and the purported financial agreements he made with Robert. Despite this setback, the committee continues to have the right to submit the case to other authorities that are responsible for conducting investigations.
During the scandal, Robert decided to withdraw from his parliamentary position, which resulted in Cameron Caldwell winning the by-election that was held.
In the meantime, there are claims that Robert used his position to assist Synergy 360 in gaining clients; however, he has denied any misconduct in this regard. Margerison, the company’s largest shareholder, has connections to some different businesses, one of which being Global Impact Inc., which is connected to Matthew C. Freedman, a former associate of the convicted felon Paul Manafort. The fact that Freedman allegedly had direct communication with an Australian minister, although he was not a registered lobbyist, raises issues about his influence and relationships within government circles.
In connection with lobbying activities, Matthew C. Freedman proposed setting up meetings between Australian leaders, such as Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and Foreign Minister Julie Bishop, and Scott Pruitt, the then-head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Freedman, however, insisted on keeping his involvement private. Freedman appeared to have just John Margerison and Stuart Robert as contacts in the Australian government at the time.
According to reports, Stuart Robert, a former minister who resigned from the Turnbull Ministry in 2016 following a contentious private trip to China, used his federal MP position to support the lobbying and consulting firm Synergy 360. Another person connected to these actions is John Margerison, a close acquaintance of Robert’s and a significant stakeholder in Synergy 360.
Emails reveal that Robert may have used his position to influence government decisions on behalf of his associates, despite his claims to be only a backbencher with no power. Among the government figures mentioned in the emails are Peter Dutton, the Minister of Immigration and Border Protection at the time, as well as other initiatives and meetings. Robert and Dutton belong to the same faction of the Queensland Liberal National Party.
Robert maintains that he received no financial benefit from his dealings with stakeholders, claiming that they were more like business associates and friends than officially recognized lobbyists.
Following the disclosure of these emails, Bill Shorten, the Minister for Government Services and NDIS, has demanded an examination of the ministries under his jurisdiction’s procurement practices.
John Margerison: The Person Behind the Mask of Philanthropy
Recently, John Margerison has been mentioned in several situations. Margerison’s influence is evident in finance and philanthropy. Like every coin, this narrative has two sides. Margerison’s portrayal of his life may differ from the truth when we learn more.
An Overview
After working in real estate, Margerison moved into jewelry and then finance. Many significant corporations have noticed his trading choice automation algorithms. Margerison’s philanthropic activity and political ties have drawn controversy despite his success.
Philanthropy or “Fake PR”?
It is problematic to label Margerison’s acts as "fake public relations" or generosity because it raises issues about his genuine motives and reputation. Margerison portrays himself as a philanthropist, asserting that he has made considerable donations to philanthropic causes such as the fight against the trafficking of children for sexual purposes and the provision of assistance to regions that are experiencing conflict, such as Ukraine. Critics, on the other hand, contend that his promotion of these activities through a variety of channels, such as Crunchbase and AccessWire, may be an attempt to control public opinion rather than true generosity.
Additionally, Margerison’s public image is made more complicated by the fact that he was involved in a scandal involving government contracts, specifically concerning a former member of parliament named Stuart Robert. Some allegations suggest that Margerison’s lobbying firm, Synergy 360, presented arrangements that would be beneficial to Robert. These allegations raise concerns about the transparency and ethics of their interactions with one another. The decision that Margerison made to live in a foreign country and to avoid being questioned by the Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit is another factor that contributes to the suspicions that he was involved.
Despite Margerison’s assertions of innocence and his efforts to put additional distance between himself and the inquiry, there are still concerns that remain unresolved, which cast doubt on his moral integrity and credibility. The fact that the committee can send the subject to other investigative authorities is further evidence of the gravity of the allegations.
To successfully navigate the truth, it is necessary to undertake an in-depth study and do a critical analysis of the narratives that are provided. To preserve the confidence of the general public, the case of Margerison demonstrates the significance of honesty and transparency. The act of concealing reality, whether it be under the premise of charity or rebranding, ultimately weakens confidence and integrity, which affects those who are affected by situations like these.
Conclusion
A cautionary tale about not believing everything that glitters is gold is found in the tragic story of John Margerison. There might be a less alluring side to him despite his seeming altruistic attitude. As we move forward in a world where digital media is increasingly dominating the conversation, it is imperative to remember the value of honesty, transparency, and integrity.
0 notes
Text
Armin Ordodary and the FSM Smart Fraud Allegations Fact-cheked (2024)
In March 2017, the media published a request for information regarding the broker fraud FSM Smart and its operator, Armin Ordodary. Indeed, we discovered a few noteworthy facts. We received confirmation that Armin Ordodary would just be a front for a larger organization after consulting with insiders. Shortly after we made the request, FSM Smart changed its domain name. Another reality is that the Scam Broker is still functioning on the internet. This is unacceptable, so we must reiterate our request for information.
Verified FSM Intelligence Regarding Armin Ordodary
Following the most recent call, we were informed that Armin Ordodary was the manager and founder of both the white-label broker platform provider NepCore and the SIAO Group. In the interim, both businesses have shut down their websites.
We have received confirmation that Armin Ordodary is a manager and shareholder of DOO, the upmarket Serbian company. This is purportedly a marketing firm that introduces fresh victims to broker scams, not a boiler room.
It has come to our attention that the Iranian-born resident of Cyprus and his businesses are merely a small component of a worldwide criminal network.
Information about the illicit broker scheme FSM Smart (www.fsmsmart.com) and its aggressive client acquisition strategy through Upmarket d.o.o., a Serbian boiler room, was provided to the media by whistleblowers. Berlin Holdings Ltd., a company based in Cyprus, is the only shareholder in this boiler room. Armin Ordodary, a resident of Cyprus, is a director of both companies.
The Warnings to Investors About Armin Ordodary
Early in 2018, the illicit broker was introduced. Currently, investors are advised not to participate in the FSM Smart scheme (www.fsmsmart.com and http://www.fsmsmarts.com).
The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) warned investors against the plan in March of 2019.
ASIC, an Australian agency, warned investors not to participate in the broker scheme in April 2019.
August 2018: A warning was released by the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) of New Zealand;
October 2018: A warning was issued by FINMA, Switzerland’s financial market supervisory authority;
In November 2018, the Manitoba-based Canadian watchdog, MSC, issued a warning to investors about FSM Smart.
According to reports, the FSM Smart contact address is Hertensteinstrasse 51, 6004 Lucern in Switzerland.
FSM Smart (Armin Ordodary’s Brainchild)
As one of the oldest and most innovative Forex brokers in the world, FSMSmart has elevated the entire industry to new heights. Both FSMSmart and its operations manager, FSM Smart Ltd., are well-known in the financial services industry.
Over 140 countries worldwide have benefited from the Company’s noteworthy and well-founded financial services thanks to its brave service and steadfast dedication.
Because of the company’s vast market expertise and experience, FSMSmart provides top-notch services. As we enhance our existing technology to enable the vast and volatile industry to establish a reliable and sound trading system, we continue to give the enormous value of the market to our clients.
The Company’s founding members, who have been in the brokerage and forex industries for more than 50 years and who have been directing and instilling values in FSMSmart from its foundation, are financial professionals and adept financial service providers.
FSMSmart is constantly coming up with new ideas and methods to ensure that our clients have a luxurious and fulfilling experience. In addition, the company strives to offer the finest possible trading circumstances and top-notch client support while carefully selecting Account Managers to ensure success in forex trading.
Financial Conduct Authority
The UK government has no control over the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), a financial regulator that is funded by fees collected from participants in the financial services sector. The FCA protects the integrity of the UK financial markets by regulating financial companies that offer services to consumers.
It focuses on how financial services companies, both retail and wholesale, are expected to behave. Similar to the FSA, which it replaced, the FCA is set up as a company limited by guarantee.
To establish regulatory standards for the financial industry, the Financial Policy Committee, the Prudential Regulation Authority, and the FCA collaborate. The FCA is responsible for the conduct of around 58,000 businesses which employ 2.2 million people and contribute around £65.6 billion in annual tax revenue to the economy in the United Kingdom.
0 notes
Text
Fred Zarbailov Drunk and Drive Allegations Fact-checked (2024)
Fred Zarbalov states that he started working as a Financial Analyst/Advisor after earning a finance and marketing degree from DePaul University. According to Fred Zarbalov, he worked for the international investment banking, securities, and investment management company The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Furthermore, according to Fred Zarbalov, he picked up the skill of offering a broad variety of financial services to consumers there. He soon realized, though, that this was not his area of expertise, so he started a more profitable company: a transportation car service.
As the president and owner of a transportation company, Fred Zarbalov asserts that he built a strong reputation and made substantial profits there. Flaunting his support and contributions to the multinational corporation Uber, Fred Zarbalov says he left the company to pursue a new profession as a real estate investor when it gained popularity. In addition to being a real estate agent and investor, Fred Zarbalov states that he is currently actively trading stocks and cryptocurrencies.
Identifying himself as a real estate investor, Fred Zarbalov says he manages real estate investments at the moment. Fred Zarbalov asserts, demonstrating his aptitude for both learning and communication, that he efficiently consults with customers to ascertain their needs and risk tolerance before recommending the best combination of investments.
Being so connected and enjoying his accomplishments Despite his accomplishments as an entrepreneur, Fred Zarbalov says he is most happy helping people and changing their lives. Fred expresses his desire to become a member of Big Brothers Big Sisters, the oldest, biggest, and most successful child mentoring program in the country.
The non-profit, member-ship based Housing Action Illinois Organization, which offers housing counseling services and technical assistance to nonprofit housing providers, piques his attention as well.
Fred Zarbalov: Police in Mundelein, Vernon Hills, and Libertyville Arrest Five for DUI
The following details were taken from press releases and police reports from Mundelein, Vernon Hills, and Libertyville. A conviction does not result from an arrest.
MUNDELEIN
DUI
On August 7, Dakota W. Lenzi of Gurnee was charged with driving while intoxicated. While looking into a traffic accident, officers found that Lenzi was operating a vehicle while intoxicated. Lenzi has a scheduled court appearance in Waukegan.
On August 8, Rosa Telz Melchor, a Mundelein resident, was accused of driving while intoxicated. Telz Melchor is scheduled to appear in court in Waukegan.
ARREST RESISTANCE
On August 9, Mundelein resident Daniel Marquez was accused of resisting arrest and obstructing justice. Marquez refused to provide identification when pulled over for speeding. Marquez resisted arrest as well. He has a scheduled court appearance in Waukegan.
THE HILLS OF VERNON
THEFT
On August 5, Fred Zarbalov, 35, of the 1000 block of Georgetown Way in Vernon Hills, was charged with retail theft. Zarbalov purchased ink from a store for $139.98. On September 7, Zarbalov is expected to appear in Waukegan court.
DUI
On August 6, Adrian Atkinson, 51, of the 2000 block of Williamsburg Drive in Vernon Hills, was charged with retail theft. Atkinson left a store with $131.36 worth of booze. Following his arrest, Atkinson was sent to Lake County Jail. It was not possible to access her court records.
DUI
On August 6, Alex Trach, 21, of Vernon Hills’ 100 block of Brandywine Court, was accused of driving while intoxicated. Trach was a part of an automobile accident. He has a Waukegan court date on August 24.
LIBERTYVILLE
DUI
On August 7, Scott A. Riley, 45, of Chicago’s 4000 block of W. Monroe St., was accused of driving while intoxicated. Riley has a Waukegan court appointment set for August 26.
The allegation against Francesco U. DiLauro, 28, of Libertyville’s 300 block of Brainerd Ave. is driving while intoxicated. DiLauro is due in court in Waukegan on September 9.
DUI (Driving Under the Influence): The Crime Committed by Fred Zarbalov
The crime of driving, operating, or being in control of a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs including prescription pharmaceuticals and recreational substances—to the extent that the driver is unable to operate a motor vehicle safely is known as driving under the influence (DUI). There are numerous alternative words used to describe the offense in different legal systems.
Laws on Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol and Drugs
The complexity of state DUI laws can be seen in the details of New York’s legal terminology. Among them are:
Typically, driving while intoxicated (DWI) requires a blood alcohol content (BAC) of at least 0.08%. In New York, the rate for commercial drivers is 0.04%.
A BAC of at least 0.18% is required for aggravated driving while intoxicated, or aggravated DWI.
Driving while intoxicated (DWAI/alcohol) is defined as having a blood alcohol content (BAC) of more than 0.05% but less than 0.07%.
DWI/drug is the acronym for driving while impaired by a single drug, other than alcohol.
Driving while under the combined influence of alcohol and/or drugs (DWAI/combination).
Conclusion
Fred Zarbalov: Essential Safety Guidelines to Prevent Drunk Driving Accidents
Drinking alcohol affects one’s ability to drive in several important ways, including poor judgment, impaired vision, longer reaction times, and difficulty judging distances. Thus, inebriated drivers frequently:
Drive carelessly
Quickness
Swell or suddenly turn
Reverse parking
Enter and depart highways, streets, and highways the incorrect way.
As a driver, your job is to drive cautiously and with awareness. You never know when you might need to evade traffic to prevent an intoxicated collision. Don’t forget to designate a driver as well. Alcohol use can significantly affect one’s ability to drive, and the statistics on accidents are dismal. Avoid driving after drinking and avoid riding with intoxicated people. Becoming a designated driver might potentially save a lot of lives.
Put on your seat belt. Seat belts “reduce serious crash-related injuries and deaths by half,” according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1988).
Maintain a safe distance. Place extra space between your vehicle and the vehicle of the person in front of you if you witness them weaving, braking suddenly, not signaling correctly, or driving in another strange manner. Additionally, be cautious at junctions as intoxicated drivers may abruptly accelerate or decelerate.
Recognize when to interact and when not to. Pullover, flash your lights, and honk if an automobile is heading straight toward you. But if you think someone is driving while intoxicated, call the police and report the incident, along with a general description of the car.
Don’t drive at night too much. Even though you might not be able to avoid it, make an effort to avoid going anywhere late at night, especially on Friday and Saturday evenings.
Stay on well-trafficked roads. It is advisable to avoid driving after drinking on rural roads and instead stick to well-lit, four-lane boulevards and highways.
1 note
·
View note