#you know that line in the 12x5 where she hesitates to tell them the fugitive was ruth?
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
(possible out of context spoilers for woe be gone up to episode 24)
(also point of this way-too-long post thats not even about dw is that i think i now have an idea of what a 13-pov/13-narrated season would look like) (if that might entice you to read some of this thing) (it would me, like, i just mean, knowing what the point is usually kinda helps reading a long thing so there you go thats the point)
right so ive been listening to woe be gone and one of my favourite things about it is how occasionally the protagonist just suddenly reveals to us a bunch of stuff hes been thinking about which he hasnt been telling us about
which is a little jarring bc hes the only voice, hes the one tellling us about everything that happens to him, and he walks us through seemingly every one of his considerations and plans
but also itâs something you can expect bc also from the start he draws attention to the fact that when we are hearing the episode, itâs been a while since the events described in them have happened to him, because he needed to... make the episode. duh. episode 2:
Wooooow. Wow wow wow. Your brain will turn anything into a morsel of nostalgia, wonât it? I did a whole episode about the first round of WOE.BEGONE and made it sound like it had a happy ending. And it felt that way, too, when I was telling the story.
The real kicker to this whole thing is that this challenge happened a month ago. You, dear listener, have not yet caught up to the point where you are watching me play WOE.BEGONE in real time.
mike repeatedly, casually, calls attention to the fact that hes in control of the entirety of what we know of the story. not just with these kinda lines but also with the fake ads, the âcue the heist musicâ, the barely-there line between the mike walters that does the announcements at the top of the show and the mike walters the character (are they the same person?), casually dropping the fact that his name is not mike walters and then never mentioning it again:
I mean, this is a guy who seemed to honestly believe that my name was Mike Walters. Hmm, I never labored under the delusion that his name was actually CANNONBALL in all caps. I wonder which of us had the better call-sign.
in this same episode he also says:
Saying that I was going to fly to Vancouver was actually a sort of silly mistake on my part. I imagine quite a few listeners heard that I was going to fly to Vancouver and wondered if that was even possible. Doesnât Mike Walters live in America? That [REDACTED] jumbled censor thing sure does sound like Saint Louisâ no matter what I did to the voice snippet, damn it! I reversed it and pitched it down and it still sounded like St. Louis. So then I switched the order of the reversed syllables and it still sounded like St. Louis, at which point I just said fuck it, some people will figure it out and it will add a little bit to the mystery-solving aspect of the podcast.
giving us a false sense of knowing the guy, as if he let us have this piece of information for free. he does a similar thing when he moves to oldbrush valley:
Iâm sure that youâre wondering about where exactly this place is. Stop trying. Iâm being vague on purpose. Donât come find me. Anne. Donât come find me.
"dont come find meâ and âim being vague on purposeâ while giving anne (and whoever really) exactly enough information to find him. there are also repeated mentions of his information security practices:
âSo, things werenât adding up and nobody would give me a straight answer. Nobody knew what to make of your little scene. So, natch, I broke into your apartment and started poking around. Youâd do the same for me, right?â
âSure thing, Anne.â I said.
âUnfortunately for me, itâs not like you wrote WOE.BEGONE on little pieces of paper and scattered them throughout your house for the spry young female detective to find. Also, your computer was bricked? Whatâs up with that?â She asked.
âOh yeah, itâs a dead manâs switch. If I donât enter a password every week, it overwrites my entire computer with 1s and 0s.â I said.
âThatâs a long way to go for WOE.BEGONE,â She said.
âOh, it wasnât for WOE.BEGONE. Itâs just good InfoSec.â
and:
How do I know that he isnât the only gamerunner? Because he doesnât log out of gmail when heâs done with it, either. Câmon, dude. At least force me to guess your password or force 2 factor authentication and get the code off the phone that I took off you while I was tying you up. When it started, I thought that the story of WOE.BEGONE would be about the consequences of seeking power, but now I think that the moral is to take your information security seriously, especially if you have something that is worth protecting.
but then also this:
âHow are you gonna narrow it down from a whole city full of people?â I asked.
âI have ways,â he said. His eyes narrowed.
âWhat is that supposed to mean?â I asked.
âDidnât you go to the University of [Redacted]?â CANNONBALL asked.
âSo? Iâve lived here for ten years,â I said. Shit. Why do I still have a Facebook page?
and this, a few episodes after âdont come find meâ:
Hunter Jeremiah Hartley has a public facebook page where he posts all the time about the stuff that happens on at O.V.E.R., pictures included. None of what we have access to out here is strictly classified. There are the cabins, but we arenât allowed in them so unless youâre breaking the rules, you donât know anything more about them than if you had looked up an aerial view of them on Google Maps. Pictures of them on social media are fine. This made it trivial for Anne to pinpoint where I was at O.V.E.R. No journalist-ing required.
he does all this stuff and says that hes âprivateâ but also that hes not, like, top of the hierarchy at this. âsure i do the basics but i could be less sloppy, there are people who do this way better than meâ. âyou caught the dumbest fish in the pond and put him in a barrelâ he says at one point to someone who has him kidnapped
another thing he calls attention to casually and repeatedly is the fact that hes not a great person:
Oh, god dammit. I donât wanna kill a pig. I mean, I know, I eat meat, specifically pork, and so Iâve just been outsourcing this exact labor for my whole life. Iâm a hypocrite if Iâm willing to let suffering happen as long as it is just outside my eyeline, but fuck it! I can be a hypocrite. Iâm worse shit than that all the time. Iâm a liar, Iâm a bad friend, Iâm a shitty podcaster. Throw âhypocriteâ on the heap.
And you might be saying to yourself âwell jeez, Mike, you donât sound like a very good person.â Yeah, no shit. A good person stands absolutely no chance of winning this game or getting their hands anywhere near this tech or any of the other levers of power that this world offers. I can be smart, I can be kind, I can hold the correct political positions. But I can also lie, cheat, steal, take advantage of other people, disregard othersâ feelings. When I was growing up my mom told me that I was capable of anything and I really took that to heart. Capable of anything. Even murder.
and then theres this entire monologue on lying:
Bigger, more important lies are mostly the truth. It is only the greasy, disgusting core of a betrayal or act of aggression that must be kept fully hidden. The goal is to be able to enact your heinous plan, not to keep them from ever feeling skeptical or suspicious of you. Your enemyâs opinion of your standing is worthless. They can say that they saw it coming all they want, but it wonât reverse their defeat. Fully blindsiding someone is great, but if you opponent knows you well and gets their wits about them, it isnât usually an option. If it is an option, you should consider loftier goals with more formidable enemies. Youâre capable of so much more!
Richard Nixon and co. created the term âlimited hangoutâ to describe the practice of telling your enemy part of the truth in order to get information from them and to keep the construction of your lie believable. They meant it as âhangingâ a âlimitedâ amount of the truth out there as bait, not as a limited time to hang out with someone, which is what I always thought it meant until I looked it up. Itâs a very 70s way of putting things. It didnât have a perfect batting average with Nixon, what with the Watergate and all, but it is a long-standing part of CIA spycraft at this point. It works, but it canât be your only line of infosec defense.
This is a great tool to have in your arsenal, but it is also important to realize that it is tool in the arsenal of every accomplished liar on the planet. Luckily, knowing that other good liars are doing this is a bit of information in itself. It means that the person who is lying to you might be giving you a lot of the truth as well. You can use that to try and reverse-engineer what lies at the murky core that they are trying to conceal from you. Two liars lying to each other? Thatâs an arms race.
Four liars lying to each other? This is WOE.BEGONE.
so hes constantly showing us ways in which hes not to be trusted but at the same time he has control over the entire narrative hes giving us. you know you cant really trust him but also what else is there to trust? youve only got his word (reference that no one will get: itâs like trying to figure out who the mole is in widm, the producers arent gonna let us)
so you dont trust him, but also you kinda do, bc you have to, and then occasionally he just opens an episode dropping a bunch of info like âive been suspecting something else than what ive been talking about has been going on and heres proof now im in the middle of a kidnappingâ. that kinda thing.
anyway. the point of all this is just to say, i think im getting an idea of what a 13-pov/13-narrated season might look like
#wbg tag tbd#if ive like completely misinterpreted wbg stuff#uhhhh#idk#dont be mean#ive listened to this once and im generally very like believing of what people say on the surface#maybe mike was only lying for a little bit to misdirect cannonball#maybe all the rest has been true#who knows not me#i just think the tension between how he makes it seem like we're like in his confidence#and then the moments where he suddenly shows some stuff hes been keeping to himself#is interesting#and i feel like 13 might do that too#like#stick to a certain framing a certain narrative until at one point that becomes untenable and she suddenly jumps to a different one#you know that line in the 12x5 where she hesitates to tell them the fugitive was ruth?#and then it says 'and she gives this one up to. she has to' before she says 'ruth was me'?#yeah that vibe. she'll stick to one story one angle one frame even when it shows some cracks#also - especially - in her own private narration. like imagining that shes narrating in some way here#and then when that particular frame stops being useful enough she'll just abruptly jump to a different one and commit to that one absolutely#so much so that you question whether she was even telling a different story before#bc theyre not entirely different stories. it's all one story she just shifts the framing a bit#when she has to reveal like a new fact or something that doesnt work in the previous framing she'll just discard it and jump to the new one#a new one that the new lie and/or thing she revealed about herself fits in. and she'll pretend that was always the story#something something retrocausal something#there were things about that too in this podcast that made me think about the timeless child but i dont have any concrete thoughts i think#post them if i have them#dont need to do a read more now right? bc tumblr does that for us#works better too dont need to go to a separate tab#and if you turned that off then you want to see long posts so
8 notes
¡
View notes