#worldsystem

[macintaministries]

Mighty Powers Of A Mother Of Godly Faith

[underwaterspiderbird]

coffee is coffee no matter how much milk you add. almost like... blood quantum was made up by unbathed drunks who thought they could beat, diddy, & gaslight other people into thinking they're "not really who they are/are really white", into believing they're something that they're not & never will be, so they all the natives stay divvied up by skin tone or erased/discredited & killing each other over arbitrary constructs instead of destroying the very colonial worldsystem & constructs designed to "erase" & assimilate native ppl's existence.

colonization is fucking weird, if you try to make sense out of it you're gonna end up hurting your sanity

“Sometimes when I tell strangers I’m Cherokee they ask,”How much are you?” They’re not asking if I know myself as a Cherokee and if I am considered by other Cherokees as Cherokee. That would be a valid, though invasive, question. Instead, they’re asking, “What percentage of ‘Indian blood’ do you have?” This question implies that the degree to which one is Cherokee is defined by racial purity. By this logic, the higher percentage of “ Indian blood” you have, the more cherokee you would be. It’s a racist question because it implies that Cherokees are defined by race, not by culture. People tend to forget that “race” is a concept created by cultures. The concept of race continues to have power only because we continue to believe in it. Funny thing is, in all my life I’ve never been asked by another Cherokee, “How much are you?” Instead, the questions are: “Where do you come from?” “Who are your people ?” “Who’s your mother?” They are questions of beginnings and continuities, kin and relationships.”

— Christopher B. Teuton, from “Cherokee Stories of the Turtle Island Liars’ Club”

[bailonglee]

現象と思考

_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-

昔の事を、

「あいつは間違い！こいつは正しい！！」

とか言ったところで、見てない訳だから、何とも言えない。

たまたまツングースカ大爆発を書いたが、ニコラ・テスラの実験説、隕石の爆発説、両方あったっていい。

だって我らは見てないんだからw🤣✨🐧

大事なのは、

今

例えばさ、

「なんたら気象団体発表の、由緒正しき情報だと、本日は曇、太陽☀は見えないでしょう。」

と、言ったとすらぁなw

で俺が、

午後から快晴になれ！

と、思うわなw

で、もし快晴になったら、

人間の思考が主、現象が従が確定しねえか？

解析はあくまで、

後追い

、大事なのは思考、って事になるよねw

と、思うがなw、知らんがw🤣✨🐧

__________----------__________

https://nazology.net/archives/60513

断定出来る資料が無いのよ、ツングースカ大爆発はね。

まだから、推理だよ私の話は。

でも、言っておくが、量子物理学って、

推理

、だからw🤣✨

クォークとか、少しずつ実証されてるが、理論物理学の範疇なのよ。

ニコラ・テスラのWardenclyffe Towerなんだが、全ての西洋の言語は、ラテン語。

ケルト混じり英語とか、ゲルマンのドイツ語とかあるが、語幹ってのがあります。

漢字と同じ忄りっしんべんは、小とかと同じ。

[------------------------+++++]

🐧語幹🐧

War[名] 戦争

den 〜させない↕en 〈例〉en-joy[楽しむ]

Clyffe →cliff [名]崖

[------------------------------------]

Wardenclyffeの語幹は、「戦争を崖っぷちにさせない」という語幹で構成されてます。

なのに、

フリーエネルギーのタワーだ！

、って説明、世界システムだ、とかさwおかしいやんw🤣

だったら、

Worldsystem Towerでええやんw🤣

なんで、Wardenclyffeなのよw🤣頭使えよw🤣

そして、なぜ関東大震災の地震計測が、オーストリアでなされたのよw🤣

なんの為に、わざわざ日本の地震を計測する？w

ほんの少し注意力上げれば、わかるやんw🤣

そしてあんな57メートルのタワーで、本当に無線で電気を供給出来るとは、素人ですら思わないw

ま、皆さん、頭を使って生きましょうw

----------

追記:

20230117　23:50

あの後、晴れたのを、大田区民なら、見た。

その後、雨降ったがw🤣

結局、人間の思考って、天候さえ従わせるんさ。

だから、みんなも、俺たちは全員、神の要素を持っています😊✨🐧

[thisisthedayof]

#thisisthedayof #metricsystem #1791 #worldsystem #lenght #lenghtcheck #mess #messwithme #messwiththebest #helpinghands #helpinghand #march30 #03302021 #032021 https://www.instagram.com/p/CNDcw7llBM3/?igshid=g83tcq8brtug

[billionier]

#BillioniersVerdictOnFinancialIndependence.💰🚀💱. The world system is in a realm of unprecedented metamorphical advancement. So much that what take 10 years to get done is completed in few months. For instance, space expedition takes years of planning but now, through technology, exploration of space is at the speed of thought. The same is applicable to investing, business, trade, commerce and entrepreneur. In my hand is a devise that I'm using to type this information, I don't need to hire a secretary though necessary. Everything about human endeavour is digital. The volume of business on the INTERNET is over $11.2 trillion. You can trade currencies online, e-commerce is a norm now. Banking today is digital. There's nothing you want to do without the use of IT. My point is, change your approach of doing things. Investing has transitioned into taking advantage of the digital space to invest and make lot of money. Abiding by the principles of change is what guarantee a blissful future. For you to be relevant in this age of accelerating change, you must think and change. One change is enough to make you a wealthy champion. #FinancialIndependence.💱🚀💰. #WorldSystem🌍🕵️✨. #Internet.💻🌐📱 https://www.instagram.com/p/CjcTHkNsMvA/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

[tsuminiochiiru]

Amnesia World port for Switch

Amnesia World port for Switch

https://twitter.com/AmnOtomate/status/1381216552054185985 The Otomate Dessert Party event held 4/11/2021 announced a Switch version for Amnesia World, which was originally released for Play Station Vita in 2014. There will be three versions available: normal, limited and download-only. Details Game: Amnesia WorldSystem: Nintendo Switch/Switch LiteRelease Date: 8/19/2021Price: 7,150 yen…

[tosinworld]

Simply because this is a world system, everything will be alright with time. We all have to concentrate our energy on what we can do well and improve on it🎙 . . . . . . . . . . . . . #dothingsright #dothingswell #competewithyourself #energyiseverything #worldsystem #everythingisgonnabealright #coachtosin #inspiringsinglemoms https://www.instagram.com/p/B_WsUjMAv0B/?igshid=w7j176l1042k

[cinemascapes08]

Good Morning 🌞 #MorningCoffee #FBF #TimeToWakeUp #ImJustGoingToLeaveThisHere #WorldSystem #NothingLeftToSay

[wesimakyaj]

Merhaba Arkadaşlar Allah'ın sistemi aynen bu şekilde işliyor. Ve siz bu filimlerden Allah'ın sistemini anlamanız için NASİP OLUP. Yayınlanmıştır. Bu filimde Allah'ın dünya sisteminin işleyişinin en güzel örneğidir. Şimdi bir daha izleyin. İnşallah sırrı Allah size anlamanızı nasip etsin. İnşallah Sevgiler Neslihan Aydın #cinema #cinematographer #cinematography #cinematographylife #tanrıyıoynayanlar #filmcamera #filmmaking #filmönerisi #cinematographylife #somethingthelordmade #allahınsistemi #dünyasistemi #engüzelanlatanfilm #sistem #god #systematic #systemgod #systemlife #matrix #matrixsystem #thetrumanshow #trumansystem #avatar #avatarsystem #repartsystem #godsystem #worldsystem (Spectrum Cineplex)

[eraykansel]

(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VSZicprNUw gönderdi)

[freeasthewindsthatblowpastme]

Confusion

About my body

It’s not normal

Nor abnormal

Nor different

It isn’t enough for any one word

Or at least that’s what I tell myself

Because I don’t feel at home in any one word

But maybe we don’t need just one word to describe us.

My body causes pain

So

Much

Pain

And joy

And sometimes it’s just there

I feel weird

Outside

Misunderstood

But I don’t

Want to feel

That way

Today was tough

But I didn’t expect it to be tough

I feel so useless

Though I helped people

I feel so far

And lately

I

Don’t make sense to me

Because we are many

Not you again

You confuse the hell

Out of me

We know

But we want to help

I heard that before

I‘m just tired of everything

Of law

And goals

And decisions

And the past

And medical stuff

And the worldsystems

And my countries systems

We understand

Oh no talking against me

That is new

We’ll we are also tired

But there is still hope

And it’s okay to be tired

But don’t you want to talk about it more deeply

I can’t reach

The depth

I feel

Weird

Like I am falling asleep

Every second

My chest

Hurts

My hands hurt

My legs hurt

What’s going on

And sometimes you stay on the surface because your to afraid to dig deeper

Okay we have

Fear

Worries

Memories

The father

The friends who went away

My brain

My future

The world

The country

The fear

Well do you notice

This smal little spot there

The love

The kindness

The peace

The freedom

Can you see it

This little spot

It’s there deep down

The hope

It’s still there

It

Is

Still

There

Remember that please

The dad

The father

The conflict

The friend who went away

The job

The fear

The loneliness

Confusion

Complexity

What

Is

Going

On

The not caring

Feeling like I am in a bubble

What is happening

I don’t understand

This feels sticky

In an ugly way

Woah

There’s a Prince

Sitting there

Waiting on his horse

To combat

The trauma

And what’s to come

You see the strength within you

Don’t you?

Wow

Meow

Krass

He made mistakes

We never talked about it

In a healthy way

Yeah

It bothers me

Because the thoughts come back

What is going on

My country is moving

In

The wrong

Direction

And this is weird

Because it seems to be moving

In a Good

Direction

But it isn’t

And I’m worried

It will blast

Through the windows

Of my home

And I won’t be

Protected anymore

I don’t feel safe here

But is there a country I would feel safer in?

Well it is how it is

Love you

And hold you

And stay with you

And want to

Run away

To a place

I can call home

Without

The fear

Of loving

The wrong

Being the wrong

Supporting the wrong

Kinds of

People

We are all

People

But we don’t seem to understand

That we need help

So we just take each other down

And try to rise above by doing so

It‘s ugly

Well

It is

And there never seems to be an end to this.

[macintaministries]

God’s Might In Man

[kingdomgracemedia]

The world system is not built on spirituality. We cannot be spiritual alone, but we have to be strategic, wise and intelligent to be successful in the kingdom of this world. #life #christian #worldsystem

[juniperpublishers-agriculture]

Are Cross-National Empirical Studies of Sustainability, Agriculture and the Environment Cumulating Forward or Erring in an About Face?- Juniper Publishers

 I have had the privilege of being a senior (or “full”) professor since 1991, who has served as a department head at three different universities and edited, guest edited, or associate edited nine journals in sociology, agriculture, political and military sociology, statistics, food, and technology. I recently found that in the last two years I have been cited by about 1200 scholars in over 80 countries, in about 50 different subject areas. Broadened scholarly communication networks have given all of us a greatly expanded opportunity to consider the theories and methodologies adopted by authors from around the world and across a considerable number of disciplines. Regrettably, while we, as members of a curious time, have been given the potential opportunity for tremendous increases in output or scholarly “yield,” I am afraid the quality of theory and methodological applications have been waylaid, and cumulative knowledge in cross-national, quantitative research has been compromised. As an illustration, a lead corporation in the “citations business” notified me recently that there are over 7,000 published articles on the Kuznet’s curve, sustainability (including industrial agriculture) and environmental damage, written disproportionately by authors in the developing world examining their own countries. Recall the hypothesis: Economic growth creates ever more environmental damage through carbon production and agricultural toxins, among other related causes, until a nation becomes sufficiently wealthy that technology and environmental awareness turn the slope of the environmental damage curve around. I gave up after reading 10 sampled articles on the Kuznet’s curve, again drawn primarily from a sample of developing country authors. The obvious question is why all these researchers would be checking on the validity of this hypothesis for their own country and others like it, which are not wealthy now, nor will they likely be close to being “rich” in the foreseeable future. Perhaps the authors never read the original theory on this dynamic, which requires the national attainment of substantial wealth, commonly measured by GNP/c.

A general goal of scientific inquiry is to accumulate knowledge for its own sake and for it to be applied to societal problematics so that the quality of global life may be sustained and improved upon. An initial step in the pursuit of scientific knowledge is to conceptualize the “order of things” (from Foucault). This requires care in the identification and definition of concepts such as “sustainability,” “ecological footprint” and the nature of each of their “causes.” Errors here are fundamental, and, unfortunately, frequent. I will not mention the specifics of the 10 articles I have just read. I will focus instead on a well-cited study by US authors (hereafter XYZ) that have a substantial and well-deserved readership, but one of their most respected articles reports some questionable procedures that serve as a counter example of the optimal conduct of inquiry. The article appeared in the American Sociological Review (ASR), and investigated the empirical veracity of different theorizations about “sustainability,” or perhaps the “ecological footprint.” It is very difficult to discern which of these concepts the authors intended to address. While the footprint and sustainability are very different concepts, they are used interchangeably throughout the XYZ article. Sustainability is accurately captured by the Brundtland Commission of the United Nations in 1987 (Our Common Future). There are three sustainability forms and only one of them directly reflects an environmental dynamic. Further discussion of the construction of the ecological footprint concept is provided in the pioneering work of Mathis Wackernagel and William Rees. Both of these conceptualizations were available long before the XYZ article was printed by the ASR. As an early step in the research process, exacting conceptualization is a requisite and it is hoped that researchers in developing and developed countries alike adopt this conventional procedure.

With regard to causes of the ecological footprint (and not, of course, social, economic, and environmental “sustainability”) one key causal force introduced in the ASR article is inspired by worldsystem theory (Wallerstein; see also Portes, Chase-Dunn and Snyder and Kick). The theory posits nations’ different positions in the world system determine variations in their internal attributes. For instance, national dominance in international trade, military power, cultural dominance, and political surveillance, the multiple networks as used by Snyder and Kick, have been shown to affect everything from national economic growth and inequality to food insecurity and environmental degradation. To my amazement, the XYZ paper chose “foreign debt” to conceptualize and measure world-system position, instead of the multiple international linkages measure empirically derived by Snyder and Kick, which is the industry standard. It has been cited and used frequently in this type of situation (Snyder and Kick; Kick et al.,). Unsurprisingly, debt was found to have no impact whatsoever on the ecological footprint (sustainability?) variable by XYZ. However, the Snyder and Kick selection, or a more recent proxy of it, have been found to be causally associated with a variety of outcomes, including a number of environmental ones, such as the ecological footprint. XYZ recognize this frailty in the appropriate choice of the independent variable in their footnote 17, introducing Snyder and Kick’s alternative at some length, but they never explain WHY they chose the conceptually inferior “debt” variable in the first place. Again, the lesson is exacting conceptualization.

After exacting conceptualization, “measurement” or variable construction from concepts is the next critical step for crossnational researchers in this area. Yes, I know it is tedious to check each of the possible data values. The lesson for researchers is to make absolutely certain there are no out-of-range or anomalous scores in the data array of all the variables in the data. Ask, is every value in this range reasonable? Some will remember that a number of years ago a researcher presented blockbuster findings that started a theoretical sea change in an important area of sociological research. Fortunately for many of my colleagues, who felt the blockbuster findings had led to the premature end of their careers, one of my colleagues in graduate school at Indiana University, Dr. Glenn Firebaugh, then at Vanderbilt, was unable to replicate the blockbuster findings. However, when he purposively left missing value cases out of the analysis, the results changed dramatically. It seemed that Blockbuster’s program inadvertently kept the cases in the analysis even with missing values of -9. That was the reason Blockbuster’s findings were so anomalous! When reproduced with “missing cases” in the analysis, Firebaugh reproduced Blockbuster’ results, and when he took the missing cases and scores out of the data he found that Blockbuster’s results were grossly off the mark—a seemingly small but momentous mistake. Normal science could resume without fear dominant interpretations were inaccurate. It is just conjecture, but what would have happened if Firebaugh had not caught the mistake or had not attended a demanding graduate department that made all of us hand calculate solutions to factor and regression analyses?

In some of the papers I have read in cross-national research the sample is not large enough to generalize to the population. There are 195 countries in the world, and a sample of 40 of them (which was the case base in one of the papers I examined recently is not adequate to generalize to that population of 195. As an analogue, it is laughable that the quantitative scores my students assign to me every semester are actually a reflection of the population of students in my class. If your class is sized 25, a sample of 12 students (a fairly typical “response rate”) will not be large enough to generalize to the class population. In fact, you need all 25. Similarly for 50 students, where the population and sample size must be close in size for the mean scores given each item to be meaningful. In all likelihood your department Head will be using an unrepresentative sample size in reaching his or her conclusions about your teaching and that of your colleagues! Check to see—your teaching results may not be generalizable due to the sample size, and this may be true every semester you have been evaluated. For me that would be around 100 semesters. Apart from that, in cross-national research determine what population you are generalizing to—any “country” even if it is owned by another (such as Tasmania)? Is your cut-off a population size of 500,000 or more? Are you using “countries,” “nations,” “states,” or ‘nation-states” as both your population and sample? The lesson pertains to sample sizes and issues of conceptualization as well. Researchers often use these concepts interchangeably, much to the confusion of the readership.

I feel cheated as a reviewer or reader of a manuscript if the authors do not offer a correlation matrix showing bivariate statistical associations among all their dependent and independent variables, as well as the relevant summary statistics (means, standard variations among all variables and the residuals). Just as some newsreaders immediately go to the sports section, the frontpage headlines, or the comics when they open a newspaper, I go to the correlations matrix, means and standard deviations, and then, the abstract in the manuscript. Any correlation of .80 or greater among the pool of regressors (independent variables) is suspect and immediately draws my attention. If several correlations of this magnitude are found, there is a probability of multicollinearity, which will affect the inferences reached in the article. In the broad scholarly area of national development, when so many indicators of development or modernization are candidates for use as independent (or dependent) variables, there is a good chance that any two variables a researcher picks will be highly correlated with one another. Different software programs offer different tests for multicollinearity, but you can be sure you have this problem if any of the beta coefficients (not Bs) in your results are greater than 1.00 or greater negative than -1.00. Researchers from the discipline of economics commonly report what I refer to as “impossible metrics” (“‘beta,” “standardized”) coefficients of 2 or 3. I encourage strict tests for muticollinearity in lieu of tests that deviate from the conventional, and are not thickly explained (e.g., XYZ). I admit sympathetic reviewers and editors may pass favorably on manuscripts that are riddled with errors for many reasons, including the “halo effect” of a theory, an author set, or both (Merton). However, to aid cumulative science I would strongly suggest cross-national quantitative researchers report: 1. means, 2.standard deviations (realizing their importance in ratio form in the error term), 3.correlation matrices, 4.unstandardized and standardized coefficients, 5.the countries used in the analysis (and why they were retained), 6.the countries dismissed from analysis (and why they were dismissed), and 7. recognize the problems with regressors that are redundant with one another. When multicollinearity is present, coefficients can swing wildly, are very sensitive to small changes in the model, and one may not be able to trust the p-values used to identify independent variables that are statistically significant. As just one example, you may find a beta coefficient that is moderately high in magnitude but is not statistically significant, or variables that seemingly have switched signs compared with the results in the correlation matrix, or redundant variables that appear to push each other in different directions (one toward stronger and positive, and the other toward the negative). These signals become rather transparent in data researchers have worked with for 40 years, but even then the strict usage of multicollinearity tests in the software program are recommended.

I have focused on XYZ in part because they note, in reference to the standard test for multicollinearity (the VIF), that the VIF score they achieved of 8.55 suggests to them “problems with multicollinearity are not dramatic.” I have seen blogs that mention 10 as the absolute cutoff point. On the other hand I have seen even more statistics textbooks or journal articles that argue for a value of 2 or 4 (Hair et al). For the sake of advancing cumulative research I suggest in well-established areas such as sustainability or the ecological footprint that, all else equal, we adopt more rigorous standards. In completely unexplored areas we should accept relatively higher VIF levels and less demanding levels of statistical significance for the testing of coefficients. There has been a notable change in this research area in the last two decades or more of reporting B (unstandardized) coefficients instead of beta (standardized) coefficients and also the deletion of correlation matrices. There may be an excellent reason for this such as greater interest in the application of results to public policy, and less interest in adjudicating competing theories. However, in the absence of betas, descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients, it becomes more difficult without built-in tests in the software to detect problems with multicollinearity.. The VIF remains, but it is apparent that test levels are unacceptably controversial. For the sake, once again, of cumulative knowledge, I think it best that we report all the statistics mentioned above, and in their conventional as well as contemporary forms. In fact, for the sake of positive movement in science, I request that all Editors require the routine publication of both Bs and betas as well as means, standard deviations, and correlations for all crossnational multiple regression studies. If Editors themselves do not begin requiring these in the immediate future, I hope the norms of science empower reviewers and researchers to do so. When we know why the cumulative body of research on one question is huge but inconclusive, we had better begin considering the methodological choices of the body of researchers in the area.  

It would be possible to continue itemizing a number of other concerns in cross-national analyses. Some suggested topics include heteroscedasticity (residuals vary with the magnitudes of regressors), time-series (evaluation of X and Y over time, with other regressors placed in the error term), identifying and analyzing outlying cases (cases lying far off the best fitted line that, if not eliminated ,will pull the line in their direction), proper identification of models, use of network analyses to identify a unit’s position among other units, skewed distributions, log transformations, autocorrelation, dummy and proxy variables, type I and type II errors, Poisson regression and count data, instrumental variables in reciprocal causation, and so on.

Here we have just discussed some of the more pernicious conditions that cause research to stumble, often fall backwards, and fail to cumulate knowledge in both the short and longerruns. These are not the more dramatic events Kuhn has treated so famously in his discussion of anomalies, revolutionary science, and paradigmatic changes. Unfortunately, the errors considered here, if they are repeated into the future, may instead culminate in another 7,000 studies of the same phenomenon, which fail despite their abundance to converge on the same empirical understandings.  

 Some Reasons Why Cross-National Empirical Studies of Sustainability, Agriculture and the Environment May Not be Cumulating Forward, But Instead Erring in an About Face *

*I wish to thank Drs. Thomas Burns, Jeffrey Kentor, and Andrew Jorgenson for past discussions of the issues appearing in this manuscript. They are not in any way responsible for the content of the current manuscript. This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch projects 1002045.  

To know more about

Journal of Agriculture Research

-

https://juniperpublishers.com/artoaj/index.php

To know more about open access journal publishers click on Juniper publishers    

[jeanschoonbroodt]

Falling away... and its consequences...

This says GOD YHVH : 

Many have fallen away from Me and My Son and Our Churches and gospel of salvation. Many are on the broad Road to eternal suffering in the lake of fire and brimstone/hell. Many will take the mark/name/number/stigma/carve/injection of the Beast-world-Mammon-system. Many will fall into the trap of the NWO/Beast/Anti-christ-worldsystem / www-internet-system / total control-system of the world-dictator. Many will suffer in all eternity, because they loved the world and its sinful pleasure more than Me, the Living Holy GOD of creation. They all despised Me and My Holy Son Yeshua ha Mashiach/Jesus the Christ and rejected the Good News/Gospel of salvation. For they wanted the worldly riches and sinful pleasures and satisfaction more than My holy Eternal glorious Kingdom of God and My holy righteousness. Their king and ruler was/is Satan/Lucifer. For they worship him in obedience to his demands and evil lusts and desires. Wickedness fills the earth and soon I will judge mankind. For I hate the evil they do... and their lawlessness. I hate what they did/do to little children in their mothers womb. I hate the evil they did in giving in to sexual immoral desires and rejecting My holy eternal values and thora and holy prophetic and apostolic warnings not to lust for evil nor to give in to it. But alas, mankind is not wise. They even refuse to acknowledge that I exist. So they deny Me and My holy heavenly and universal Reign. Therefore I gave them over to a spirit of immorality, so that their evil done against Me would be revealed to all... and all will see how they derailed in their evil sensuality. I AM. 

Prophecy 30.11.2020. Received by The Candle / Jean Schoonbroodt. NL. EU.

[irl-futaba]

Hi everyone! so I coined two new system terms

System that has other worlds inside of a headspace that any headmate can go to, usually with real, fictive and worlds that where made/imagined: a WorldSystem

The flag:

And

System in a system belonging to a system member they made themselves: a MinSystem/a Mini system(made for people who don’t want to use subsystem)

The flag:

I designed the terms and flags by myself, this is my first time coining anything

And I only coined then because these are my system types-