#we were estranged
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
i’m starting to feel like losing my grandpa is hitting me even harder than losing my dad tbh
#death /#family death /#i miss my dad very much but by the time he passed he was a completely different person#we were estranged#i saw my grandpa all the time and we always had a good relationship#even when his poor health made him (understandably) cranky it was never a question whether or not he loved me#he was a constant and loving presence in my life and in the lives of my immediate family#i knew he was going to pass soon but it doesn’t make it any easier#it sucks when you don’t realize just how much you love someone until they aren’t with you anymore#i know his spirit is still out there and watching over me. but it doesn’t make it any less hard#it’s really hitting me today sorry#I guess this is something that will get easier over time#but right now it hurts. a lot
1 note
·
View note
Text
it's still unhinged that they didn't really plan out ford's actual character until his debut and he's built backwards from the question of "who would make stan the absolutely bitter hurting person he is while also being someone stan would do anything to save"
#the naive era when we didn't think they were estranged and had all those mystery trio aus....#stan being described as a 'well of sadness desperate for any type of affection' from the get go.....
282 notes
·
View notes
Text
#film: while you were sleeping#while you were sleeping#sandra bullock#bill pullman#i think jack kind of has an obsession with being the good son#the one who doesn't rock the boat#doesn't upset his parents#doesn't make decisions with himself as first priority#because we all know peter does#he's estranged from the family at the beginning of the movie#he's...well a putz#and i think jack feels like he needs to pick up the slack#when honestly his parents just want him to do what he wants to do#and he's a bit blind to that because he's trying to compensate for peter#things i made
159 notes
·
View notes
Text
let me be clear i like veilguard but it does suck that no one disapproves anymore outside of like. three choices. i want to be fighting for my life earning approval back again someone has GOT to hate my ass. i should be careful about party composition and companion reactions again. i miss tactically taking fenris out of the party before i'm nice to merrill like those were the days
#please omg can someone hate my ass . not really. but in previous games it sometimes did feel like i was earning approval back#like a. 'even when we fight i still love you. don't forget that' way . i wanted some uphill battle and dav IS super sanitised#the difference is more staggering to old players than new ones. i think dav plays rly well for someone who doesnt know the franchise#but i keep asking questions like 'should the dalish not be more worried about solas/etc' 'the crows r not this nice'#'why wouldnt isabela ask about varric' 'there should probably be more fantasy racism here'#of course these r the devs who were slandering zevran weeks before release. however its also just. man.#I AM ENJOYING THE GAME THOUGH. just wish it had a bit (a lot) more relevance and respect to what its built up in the prev games#dragon age#dav spoilers#veilguard spoilers#dav#txt#like for example i think one of my favorite small writing moments is cass asking about the inquisitor's family in dai#where she approves if you are also estranged but disapproves if you say you want to go back#because for a split second she does not just see a so called 'herald' that she's forced to work with#it's someone just like her who never got along w their family and despite herself she likes the inquisitor more for it#or it's someone who couldn't be less like her and her dislike and initial mistrust becomes more certain#it just. there's is an amount of depth lost when vg tries this hard to make rook be loved as a default
31 notes
·
View notes
Text
Something I appreciate about Hortus de Escapismo is how it portrays the Laterans and non-Laterans, especially in contrast to each other. Guide Ahead already gave us the angel ethnostate vs multi-racial heretics, which made for a pretty effective if blatant commentary on Laterano. And while it might seem Hortus is kind of repeating the same formula, I think it's got something subtler going on with interesting implications.
On one side we have the abbey's inhabitants: sankta, sarkaz and all other races--hell, even a seaborn for a moment. Are there cracks here and there? Of course, that's a whole plot point. But it can't be denied there is genuine camaraderie and self-sacrifice going on between these people who are simply trying to survive together (which is what makes those cracks all the more volatile).
Contrast this with the Laterans, who are dysfunctional as hell. Lemuen, Oren, Richele, and Spuria; I can't say I fully parsed everything happening between them on a moment-to-moment basis, but it was overall apparent that none of these people trust each other. Even though they're friends and classmates and colleagues, even though they're working for the good of the same state, even though they're sankta who can literally read each other's minds. There's just this constant mess of cahoots and conspiracy and treachery and bitter friction, and it takes the threat of an Innsmouth-Jonestown crossover event to get them to finally work together.
I thought it was a nice way to show more of Laterano's flaws. It's one of their core themes that they aren't as great as they say they are, but you'd think they would, at the least, have blessed harmony thanks to their literal hivemind. But evidently that isn't true either. And again, these are agents at the highest levels of the government. If they're this dysfunctional, what does that say for Laterano as a whole?
Which leads me into thinking about what the future of Laterano might have in store. I've seen some folks point out how these events have these greatly compelling premises that don't actually resolve any of the issues they bring up. Laterano only remains Laterano. And this is true! But I think it's intentional, setting up a slow burn of a regional conflict. The Lateran state is holding together, the status quo remains unchanged, the Law is content. But for how much longer? Guiding Ahead introduced us to the divide in Laterano on a broad level, the state vs heretics. Hortus de Escapismo shows the cracks within the state, narrowing in on individuals who nominally should be on the same side but aren't. The next logical narrative step would be seeing the state finally cracking apart from whatever looming danger the Law sainted Federico to deal with.
Some sort of schism, perhaps; that seems like the sort of existential threat that would directly threaten the Law's directive of preserving the Sankta. Law's awareness of it would also imply it's an internal threat, something festering in the hearts and minds of Sankta and thus one It's able to sense (at least that's what makes sense to me. We don't actually know how the Law works, so it could very well just have random magic prophetic abilities). And especially with the constant background pressure of trying to legitimize their Summit of Nations, what better way to drive that issue to the forefront by throwing Laterano into utter political chaos?
#arknights#a genuine schism would probably result in. so many fallen huh. would be interesting seeing laterano's community struggle with that#maybe the threat has something to do with the iberian church and seaborn? considering those were elements that appeared in hortus#and they were discussing a potential reconciliation between laterano and iberia too. reads like setup to me.#reaching out to iberia would be ripe for a widescale collision of ideologies that could lead to another schism#and for iberia it'd also be thematically relevant given their other estranged relationship w another glorious near mythical country#also i want to see the sankta face the seaborn. they're not so different if you think about it.#precursor tech hiveminds dedicated to the group's survival. one is hyperadaptive and ever spreading the other is conservative and insular.#so the ideological threat of a schism and the physical threat of the seaborn#...or maybe also the ideological threat of seaborn? they have their own church too after all#PAPAL SCHISM ARKNIGHTS EDITION. 3 POPES 3 POPES. LATERANO IBERIA WE MANY#oh uh and again a schism would result in so many fallen which could tie in the whole. yknow. thousand year race war w the sarkaz.#that's kinda super duper really important for laterano's themes#sorry i'm just writing a whole other post in these tags :P
64 notes
·
View notes
Text
Joking abt tommy and tubbos apparent legal marriage somehow spiraled into THIS HwhduwuxhGAHDHAHXUAHD
++ just dsmp doods in general :3
(to anyone who may NOT know this doesnt mean i support dream, idk if ppl still make the association of dsmp character -> dream liker but man FUCK that guy. Glad gumball "walk em down" watterson got his ass)
#NOT poppytwt ... poppy tmblr? i guess the twt doesnt apply#WHATEVER#all slash jaying we were just dying on call fucking talking abt this#ctubbo#ctommy#cranboo#dsmp fanart#dsmp characters#CHARACTERS!!#not shipping#again just goofing aboot#how you say a GAG#benchtrio#beeduo#clingyduo#cclingyduo#cbenchtrio#cbeeduo#ugh cbenchtrio is so fucking funny#two husbands and their estranged dog who's slowly losing it#ps: forgot ranboos horns like 90% of the time#IGNORE THAT
96 notes
·
View notes
Text
ID: Shaded art of Noelle and Kris from Deltarune. They're in their dark world appearances, with lace on Noelle's dress and Kris' armor. Kris' boots are more detailed. Noelle has cross earrings and Kris has anti-cross earrings. Noelle dips Kris as if they're dancing and raises a knife above their soul. She scowls at them, crying. Kris looks up with a blank smile. Red strings fall from Kris. Two rings of rainbow light burst behind them both, centered between their faces. The background is dark shades of blue, purple and pink. End ID thought about snowgrave and the idea of there being a noelle boss fight too hard
#deltarune#noelle holiday#kris dreemurr#snowgrave#described#safe utdr#star art#what if we were semi-estranged childhood friends and you had to kill me to free us both of the entity possessing me
201 notes
·
View notes
Text
#Tom Cruise#War of the Worlds#War of the Worlds 2005#Ray Ferrier#pilvimarja edits#we were talking on the Roosmav server about the dads Tom has played and ranking which of them is actually the best dad#and believe it or not but we think Fail Dad Ray might actually be the winner#he starts out as a selfish weekend dad who's completely estranged from his kids but the character arc he's given turns him into a true Dad#who would sacrifice everything for his kids
108 notes
·
View notes
Text
Giving a complicated tragic childhood backstory to your favorite character is all fun and games, until you realize you need to account for how old all the other adult characters would have been at the time and realize that scenes that would work perfectly if one character was twenty three and the other was fourteen stop working when you need other characters who are played by adult actors clearly younger than they are to be in college at the same time so your story beats line up thematically.
#Don't worry. I made an excel document for this over a year ago#Was that unhinged? Yeah. But this is harder than you think it is#In unrelated news it is now reasonable to have a child in your 20s 30s or 40s depending on when the plot needs the child#Also people in their early 20s can be in grad school have already established careers and adopt children now. I've declared it.#Also: Hollywood stop trying to trick me into believing women in their 30s are the same age as men in their 50s. It's never gonna work.#I'm fighting for my life to make these age gaps normal even on a platonic level#Don't worry I aged the girls up and the boys down#But still this is a bit ridiculous#If you use the actors' ages it doesn't work. Garrison's actress is 16 years younger than Curtain. Why?#I mean I like the casting. But SQ is a teenager. We know Curtain has had his evil plans at least since SQ was born and lost his bio dad#and if the Whisperer is Garrison's invention that means she and Curtain were working together when SQ was born#If SQ in the show is 16 (the actor was older I believe) and Garrison is 37 (that's how old the actress is now she was younger at time)#That means Garrison was only 21 and Curtain was well into his 30s. And that's after you age SQ down and Garrison up for the calculations#So Garrison was likely (according to the shows' casting) even younger than that which begs the question what was Curtain doing?#Was he spending his 30s lurking around college campuses and high schools looking for a kid whose inventions he could steal?#What in the Marcus Cutter is that about?#All these jokes about Garrison being SQ's uninvolved divorced stepmom but nah she's really his estranged big sister#also this is very frustrating because the irl age gap between the actress who plays Number Two and Tony Hale only 7 years#but they're the ones for whom a 16 year age gap would have actually made sense because he adopts her in the books!#but now since Garrison is clearly so much younger than Number Two Curtain and Benedict I have to deal with this#(Don't worry I figured it out and made the age gaps normal. You just now have to believe Number Two is only a year older than Garrison)#It was the stress of living with her family that aged her and Garrison just looks naturally super young that's what we're going with.#And don't get me wrong:#I do like the actresses and actors they casted they're great but sometimes I google the ages and I'm like oh you cannot be serious#But we've (more or less) figured it out#Rant over#writing#writing struggles#tmbs
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
this is flynn to me
#hes my best friend in the whole world#hes my dad hes my son hes my uncle we picked apples together in an orchard were estranged we talk daily were betrothed i wanna punch him#the librarians#flynn carsen
34 notes
·
View notes
Text
"Some modern historians, apparently fascinated by the fact that Matilda was eleven years older than her second husband, Geoffrey of Anjou, have been quick to assert that the marriage was unhappy. The historical basis for this assertion rests upon the word of the Durham chronicler, who stated that when Matilda returned to Henry I’s court in 1129 it was because Geoffrey had repudiated her. [Historians have thus assumed that their mutual incompatibility led to hostility and an eventual separation]. However, it must be noted that the northern chronicler was hardly in a position to have first-hand information about events across the Channel, and that he had the chronology of the affair completely wrong. The author placed Matilda’s marriage in 1129, and wrote that only a few days after King Henry returned to England on 13 July of that year, he was told that his daughter had been repudiated by her husband and had returned to Rouen with only a few attendants. The marriage actually took place in 1128, and Matilda was in Anjou with her husband in 1129 when the la Haye brothers brought a charter in favor of the abbey of Fontevraud to her for her confirmation. The other contemporary accounts of Matilda’s separation from her husband did not record her departure or suggest reasons for it, but only noted her return to Anjou in 1131.
It is possible that Matilda’s return to her father’s court in 1129 was not a marital separation at all, but rather a political mission. Perhaps Matilda and Geoffrey grew uneasy in their isolation and began to doubt the commitment of the Anglo-Norman barons to their cause. Leaving her husband behind to manage affairs in Anjou, Matilda may have travelled to Normandy seeking clarification of her position. A few scraps of evidence point in this direction. A letter that Hildebert of Lavardin wrote to Henry I in 1131 expressed pleasure that the king was now reconciled with the count of Anjou, who ‘had now fallen in with his wishes in everything concerning him and his daughter’. Henry of Huntingdon and Robert of Torigny stated that a ‘great council’ held at Northampton on 8 September 1131 decided that Matilda should be returned to her husband. The wording implies a decision made by the great men of the realm for political reasons, not a family’s success in persuading a tearful daughter to return to a husband whom she disliked. Furthermore, William of Malmesbury wrote that ‘no small gathering of the nobility being held at Northampton, the oath of fidelity to her was renewed by those who had already sworn and also taken by those who had not done so previously’. The renewal of the oath also suggests that Matilda’s mission may have been occasioned by concern over the succession rather than by the marital discord that historians have often taken for granted."
-Jean A. Truax, "Winning over the Londoners: King Stephen, the Empress Matilda and the Politics of Personality", The Haskins Society Journal 8 (1996)
#empress matilda#geoffrey of anjou#my post#12th century#We don't and can't know the historical truth but this is an interesting alternate perspective for sure!#though it doesn't change the fact that Matilda does seem to have been coerced/forced/pushed into the marriage#and that fact in turn cannot be used to determine what they thought of each other or how they got along after they did marry#also both perspectives are not mutually exclusive - they could've become estranged AND she might have left to settle her succession#But ofc it's entirely possible that this alternate version may have been true#It does fit the claims of chronicles like Torigny who spoke of how there were tensions between Henry and Matilda & Geoffrey#before his death because he refused to surrender her dowry castles or pay homage to her as he should have#But ultimately however the marriage began they do seem to have formed more-or-less functional partnership#and were evidently mutually invested in their kids#so there's that#I really like alternate perspectives like this that make you question established historical narratives by scrutinizing the actual evidence#(also I had many many problems with this chapter and how it dismissed and downplayed gendered criticisms against Matilda#but that's another issue)
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
i hate an evil woman, especially my daughter who slaughtered her own husband. and i’ll never approve of helen, your wife, or even speak to her. i don’t think much of your voyage to troy to get that worthless woman back again.
— tyndareus to menelaus, from euripides' orestes.
i don’t risk pollution talking to you. and yet i do lament my sister’s death, clytaemnestra, whom i never saw after i sailed off to troy, driven there by that fated madness from the gods. now i’ve lost her, i weep for our misfortune.
— helen to electra, from euripides' orestes.
it’s not good for a young unmarried girl to walk around in public.
— helen to electra about hermione, from euripides' orestes.
#helen of troy#helen of sparta#euripides#orestes#clytemnestra#so what we know from this is that helen and clytemnestra were very close sisters#helen was estranged from her own father because of her dishonor#leda also killed herself because of helen's dishonor (see euripides' helen)#young unmarried girls were not encouraged to go out in public#which must have applied also to young helen#wow#heleniad.txt
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
i have some Thoughts about the claire plotline obviously and i actually genuinely like her as a person but i dislike her character wherein i don’t like the fact that they introduced her with the sole purpose of being carmy’s love interest and posing as a conflict for the restaurant? considering she’s supposed to be a childhood friend of carmy’s and grew up with the rest of the berzatto family i wish she had gotten the chance to be developed and fleshed out as her own character instead of just being used as a plot device. the buildup of her and carmy’s relationship was definitely very abrupt but in a show that revolves around (found) family it just felt very out of place for us to be introduced to a character with explicit romantic intent like that
#won’t be going into why i think it’s uncharacteristic for carmy because i’m sure other people have already pointed it out as well#but yea there was that too#when we got showed the scene of them running into each other in the season trailer i was getting the romantic Vibes but i was like surely#they won’t go that way.. and when they were obviously Going That Way i was like ????#might write a full thinkpiece later but yea i don’t hate claire. but i hate that her character only exists to serve a purpose and not as a#stand-alone. like maybe she’ll get fleshed out a bit later but it felt very cheap and tacky#for them to drop the ‘oh actually she and carmy have always known each other and they’ve always liked each other’ lore during e6#especially in a show where every character is very lovingly fleshed out and developed and given this sense of familiarity? like in the pilot#when we see richie and sugar for the first time even though we’re not explicitly told what their relation is to carmy the sense of#familiarity and history is there. we didn’t get that click with claire and i get they were supposed to be estranged but…?#my txt#the bear spoilers
38 notes
·
View notes
Text
Two queer looking alt people visited the house as prospective roommate and i am as always overjoyed at the immediate familiarity. Angling for her to win the spot.
#fully greeted each other like we were estranged friends#usually have a hard time deciding whether to use formal or informal pronouns with strangers my age#but this was immediate#ent talks#same hat kinda vibes
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
so. roy's sister is very clearly a decent chunk younger than him. sofia barclay and brett goldstein are like ten years apart which leads me to the point: do you guys think she was born after roy went to sunderland. and if so do you think thats maybe a little bit why hes So close with phoebe....... was so excited for his little sister and then he was fucken Not Around for her whole childhood and then when they really connect as adults, she wants roy as part of her daughter's life even if he's a little iffy about the idea because hes like a 30 year old grouch who doesnt know fuck about kids
#roy kent#ted lasso#phoebe ted lasso#phoebe kent#phoebe o��sullivan#doctor o'sullivan#could be either tbh#got dangerous amount of roy kent on the brain today.#i know the common hc is to call his sister ruth but i like calling her ruby#if you hear me out it can be both.#they called her ruthie growing up but when she was a baby she couldn't quite get 'th' so she called herself ruby#and it stuck#we all win. holding hands and spinning.#anyway.#i am kind of obsessed with the idea that ruby and roy were estranged for a long time#like she grew up Knowinf about her brother the footballer#he came home for holidays and called on her birthday#but roy was Just as much of a shithead as jamie don't even TRYYYYY#i can very clearly see him being like. hey kid love you but i'm too busy being 20 and sexy and famous#to spend actual real bonding time with an eleven year old#cause he's clearly got a weird relationship with his parents also#the only time we hear about them is like. yeah my dad is old of course he's a little racist#the rest of the time it's about his grandfather#so idk i think they were estranged for a long time and then when they're both Grown Up#ruby is with some dickhead who gets her pregnant and splits and roy is like.#do you want me to kill that guy. i'll kill that guy for you. sounds like he sucks.#i also think he'd come to ruby's bat mitzvah and let her stand on his insanely expensive shoes while they dance#god. roy kent and family. fungus in my brain.#beebles#ramblings of a madman
23 notes
·
View notes
Text
finished yuri on ice for the second time and let me just tell you that anime is much gayer than i remember
#i thought it was just some subtext we were reading into#or some estranged dialogue#but no there was SO MUCH physical tough going on#good for them !#yuri on ice#viktuuri#victuuri
18 notes
·
View notes