#under the communist portland regime this will be law

[despazito]

now i'm imagining an insane made up person in my head who calls for all dog breeds created by monarchies to be banned. shih tzus? gone. king charles spaniel? well its in the name. banned. only the proud lurcher and wheaten terrier shall be the dogs of the proletariat

[creepingsharia]

Democrats’ Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act Shields Jihadists

Amazing how quickly they wrote this bill, almost as if they had it planned, pre-written and waiting in the wings in the event of a successful coup.

Keep in mind, Muslim groups have been advising DHS/FBI/DOJ for years to change focus from Islam terror to white supremacy. The DHS whistelblower who exposed that information was killed shortly after doing so.

See video at end of post.

Democrats’ Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act Shields Jihadists

By Andrew C. McCarthy

How interesting that the familiar array of Islamist-apologist and left-wing groups, notoriously opposed to U.S. counterterrorism efforts, has lined up in support of congressional Democrats’ latest push for a “Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act.” Could it be because the proposed legislation goes out of its way to shield domestic terrorists who are catalyzed by foreign jihadist organizations?

You needn’t read far into the bill to hear the alarm bells.

Section 2 provides a definition for “domestic terrorism.” Sounds sensible . . . until you remember that federal law already has a definition of domestic terrorism. The term is codified by Section 2331(5) of the criminal code. It’s been there for a long time, and it’s perfectly fine. So why would we need another one?

Obviously, Democrats are not defining but redefining. The point is not to clarify what is already clear about domestic terrorism. It is to carve out an exemption from the definition — specifically, to create a new safe haven for a very specific category of terrorist.

Under the longstanding Section 2331 definition, “domestic terrorism” means activities that occur primarily within the territorial U.S., that are “dangerous to human life,” that violate state or federal law, and that are intended to accomplish one of the following three objectives: 1) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, 2) to influence government policy by intimidation or coercion, or 3) to affect government conduct by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping.

Among the best things about this straightforward definition is that it has no exceptions. As long as the activities involved meet the stated criteria, the definition “domestic terrorism” applies to any terrorist, regardless of race, ethnicity, religion, ideology, or any similar characteristic. It makes no difference whether a terrorist is animated by white supremacism, sharia supremacism, black separatism, communism, anarchism, or any other -ism. If the terrorists are operating in our country, and they use or threaten to use force to intimidate our citizens or coerce our government into acceding to their demands, they are engaged in domestic terrorism. Period.

Not so with the Democrats’ new proposal. After throat-clearing about how “domestic terrorism” means what Section 2331 says it means, the proposal hastens to add “except . . .”

Except what? Domestic terrorism is heinous, so why would we want to exempt from the definition any person or group who engaged in such conduct? Apparently, to insulate domestic jihadists from scrutiny — or, if you prefer, to guard against mutiny by the Democrats’ Islamist allies.

The proposed exception states that the standard definition of domestic terrorism does not include acts perpetrated by individuals associated with or inspired by (A) a foreign person or organization designated as a foreign terrorist organization … ; (B) an individual or organization designated under Executive Order 13224 [which relates to foreign terrorists and foreign entities] … ; or (C) a state sponsor of terrorism[.] [Emphasis added.]

In other words, if a Muslim in the United States commits a mass-murder attack because he has been inspired by al-Qaeda’s call for believers to attack American targets, or by the Iranian regime’s revolutionary jihadism, that attack would not be considered domestic terrorism.

You may be thinking, “Hey, McCarthy, stop getting everyone all riled up. Your hypothetical terrorist doesn’t need to be covered under domestic terrorism because he’s already covered under foreign terrorism, right?”

Wrong.

Or are you forgetting the Obama-Biden administration legerdemain? Whether it was the mass murder at Fort Hood, in San Bernardino, or at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, the administration, its Homeland Security and Justice departments, and the FBI all resisted labeling the attack as “terrorism” because, they told us, the Muslim assassins did not appear to have “operational ties” to foreign terrorist organizations. Even if an attack was obviously terrorism, it wouldn’t be called “terrorism” because it hadn’t been directed by an organization the government had designated as “terrorist” — just “inspired,” which wasn’t good enough.

Of course, such an act would have fallen under the definition of “domestic terrorism,” but that’s because the Section 2331 federal definition did not have any exceptions. Now, if the Democrats’ proposal were enacted, there would be an exception — domestic attacks inspired by overseas jihadist groups would not be considered domestic terrorism. Why do you think the groups that reliably oppose counterterrorism measures are supporting this one?

What’s the point of these definitional shenanigans? It is that the proposed legislation would mark a change in the federal approach to domestic terrorism. Up until now, Congress has merely defined domestic terrorism, it has not prescribed any domestic terrorism crimes or pushed for domestic terrorism prosecutions. Currently, terrorism crimes in federal law target foreign and international terrorism. That is because, as I’ve previously detailed, there are numerous federal and state crimes on the books that can be used to investigate and prosecute domestic terrorists. Congress focused on foreign terrorists in its statutes because they tend to operate outside U.S. jurisdiction; the federal government needs extraordinary laws to reach them — laws that enable surveillance, the interruption of funding and recruitment streams, and prosecution (which often requires coordination with foreign governments).

The Democrats’ new proposal, however, would target domestic terrorism in an unprecedented way. There would be no new domestic terrorism crimes, at least not yet; but there would be a new concentration on investigating, arresting, and prosecuting domestic terrorists. Just not all domestic terrorists. In fact, just a very specific breed of domestic terrorist: white supremacists and neo-Nazis — i.e., what Democrats consider to be right-wing terrorism or, more specifically, Trump-inspired insurrectionists in the wake of the January 6 Capitol riot.

The proposed legislation would require domestic terrorism units to be created in the Department of Homeland Security, the Justice Department, and the FBI, in addition to a new “Domestic Terrorism Executive Committee” made up of high-ranking federal law-enforcement officials. Besides staffing up, these agencies would be required to file semi-annual reports for the next decade, outlining the extent of the domestic terrorist threat and the efforts they are making to combat it — how many investigations, arrests, indictments, etc. There would also be a mandate to establish “Training to Combat Domestic Terrorism” so that the feds could instruct state, local, and tribal law-enforcement in how to detect domestic terrorists, keep them from infiltrating police forces, and prosecute them.

But again, Democrats are not interested in combating all domestic terrorism. Not only have they effectively excluded from coverage American-based jihadists who are associated with or inspired by foreign terrorist organizations and their state sponsors. The new proposal, again and again, is explicit in focusing on “white supremacists and neo-Nazis.”

The required reports, for example, would have to “include an assessment of the domestic terrorism threat posed by White supremacists and neo-Nazis, including White supremacist and neo-Nazi infiltration of Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies.” They would itemize “any White-supremacist-related incidents or attempted incidents” that have occurred since April 19, 1995 — that would be the day Timothy McVeigh bombed the Oklahoma City courthouse. Federal agencies would also account for all their “White-supremacist” cases, from investigation through sentencing, and so on.

Here’s a thought experiment: Every time the proposed legislation invokes the term “white supremacism,” ask yourself what Democrats and their supporters would say about a bill that instead said “sharia supremacism” — the animating ideology of jihadist terrorists.

As federal law has recognized for decades, all terrorism in our country poses a threat. None of it should be exempted, and all of it should be aggressively investigated and prosecuted, consistent with the constitutional principle of equal protection under the law. The Democrats’ proposal is not about countering terrorism; it is about weaving a political narrative.

The shielding of jihadists is no surprise. The last time Joe Biden was helping run the government, the word “terrorism” was verboten and “violent extremism” was substituted. Out of this same epistemological haze came such tragi-comic terms as “man-caused disasters,” so determined were Democrats to avoid upsetting their Islamist allies by noticing the not infrequent coincidence of terrorism and Muslims. (Apparently, “white-man-caused disasters” can safely be called terrorism.)

Studiously unmentioned in the Democrats’ proposal, moreover, is the radical left — no Antifa, no Black Lives Matter militants, no communists, anarchists, or enviro-terrorists. Even as Portland, Seattle, and Denver remain under siege, the plan is to pretend that the last seven months of insurrectionist rioting never happened; or if it did, that it was the noble kind of insurrection.

The proposed Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2021 would prevent terrorism about as much as President Biden’s executive order blitz will meet his inaugural vow to unite the country. Under the guise of addressing a real problem, Democrats would give a pass to jihadists and left-wing militants, appease their interest groups, and intensify the nation’s deep divisions.

---------------------------------

Interestingly, 135 so-called civil rights organizations - many are simply subversive, foreign-linked and funded, anti-American, anti-white hate groups - signed a letter to Congress opposing new domestic terror laws.

Why? Because they don’t want those laws used against “Black Activists, Muslims, Arabs, and movements for social and racial justice.” In other words, they don’t want them used against the real threats to America - the BLM’s, NFC’s, Antifa’s and other groups - likely some who signed the letter - who have been actively working to overthrow America for decades.

Instead, they want Congress to use appropriations (taxpayer money) to label anyone who opposes their views as white supremacists, shut them down and jail them if possible.

Oh, they also want to report on white supremacist crimes quarterly. Remember when Democrats took over the House, they stopped producing a monthly report on Islamic terror that focused on domestic Islamic terrorists. That was the impetus for the Creeping Sharia monthly report titled A Month of Islam in America.

[biguns60plus]

Must read this quickly brother . . .

Since FB flagged me...here I copied and paste this article for those that asked about POTUS “secret weapon” revealed.

Source: Natural News and Brighteon

FYI: TAKE IT HOWEVER IT RESONATES AS WITH ANY NEWS ARTICLE YOU FIND. DO YOUR RESEARCH AND FACT CHECKING. NO NEED TO POST LINKS. WE ALL ARE AWARE OF THE 14th AMENDMENT! DONT GO SHOOT THE MESSENGER...YOU ARE WELCOME!

Remember:The law in the books is always different than the law in action!!

————————————

“Trump’s “secret weapon” revealed: Fourteenth Amendment allows the President to strip Electoral College votes from states supporting censorship against voters; enables mass arrests of mayors, governors and judges who support BLM”

POTUS’ secret weapon revealed.

Fourteenth Amendment allows the President to strip Electoral College votes from states supporting censorship against voters; enables mass arrests of mayors, governors and judges who support BLM

The results of the 2020 election are already locked in: Trump wins, and he goes on to dismantle the corrupt, criminal Democrat party that tried (and failed) to destroy America and replace it with a communist regime of left-wing authoritarian tyrants.

How does Trump accomplish this?

President Trump has a “secret weapon” that I’ve been talking about for several months in Health Ranger Report podcasts [...]. Until recently, I didn’t know the exact nature of the secret weapon but was told by highly reliable sources that plans were already in place for Trump to defeat the Democrats and protect America from left-wing efforts to destroy this nation.

Now we’ve been able to confirm the content of this “secret weapon” that will be invoked to save America. It’s the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America.

How the Fourteenth Amendment grants Trump the power to strip power away from treasonous domestic enemies

The Fourteenth Amendment — see the full text here — speaks directly to the powers of the federal government in dealing with officials, individuals and states that are engaged in “rebellion” against the United States of America.

Specifically, the Fourteenth Amendment grants the U.S. President the power to:

Arrest and indefinitely hold all public officials — including mayors, governors, state legislators, federal judges and law enforcement officials — who support “rebellion” against the United States or who have “given aid or comfort” to the enemies of America. (Section 3)

Eliminate House of Representatives positions for California and other states which are engaged in supporting Big Tech censorship platforms that are supporting rebellion against the United States of America and “abridging” the right of voting-aged citizens to participate in elections (via censorship). This implies that Electoral College votes would also be proportionally reduced in these states. (Section 2) It would also apply to states like Oregon which are reportedly funding “war encampment” installations that house insurrectionists who are unleashed each night to attack federal buildings and federal law enforcement officers.

Eliminate all federal financial support for cities and states which are engaged in “insurrection or rebellion” against the United States. Section 3 specifically states that all such claims of federal money obligations to the states “shall be held illegal and void.” (Section 4)

In essence, the Fourteenth Amendment grants American citizens “equal protection” under law, but for public officials or states which are engaged in “insurrection or rebellion” against the United States, those equal protections are revoked.

The Democrats already know all this, which is why they are pursuing a plan of election chaos, hoping to throw the entire election process into mass confusion, from which they plan to attempt an illegal coup to eliminate Trump from office and claim political power over the nation.

Many Democrat-run states are already in open rebellion, aiding and comforting illegal insurrectionists who are attempting to overthrow the United States government

It should be rather obvious that at this very moment, California, Oregon, Washington, New York, Illinois and many other states are engaged in open rebellion against the United States, and that thousands of public officials within those states — mayors, governors, state legislators, police chiefs, etc. — are granting “aid or comfort” to the rebellion.

Under the Fourteenth Amendment, Trump merely needs to declare an insurrection, then he can have Mayor Lightfoot (Chicago), Mayor Wheeler (Portland), Mayor Durkan (Seattle) and even de Blasio (NYC) arrested and removed from office for violating their oaths of office. All those mayors (and many more) have taken an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States, but they have violated their oaths, and under the Fourteenth Amendment that means they have nullified their own right to equal protection under the law.

Because they violated the U.S. Constitution and actively engaged in rebellion against the United States, in other words, they no longer enjoy the benefits of protections under the Constitution.

In addition, President Trump can eliminate congressional House seats for states that support rebellion, reducing their apportionment in the House. This means the states’ Electoral College votes are also reduced, since those numbers are based on the number of House + Senate representatives for each state. This is based on the fact that these states are aiding the efforts of Big Teach to deny the rights of conservatives to participate in elections and voting, via politically-targeted censorship and voter suppression tactics now routinely used by Google, Facebook and other tech giants.

Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment specifically addresses voter suppression. It says that states which support the suppression of the ability of citizens to participate in voting will lose a portion of their own seats in Congress as well as Electoral College representation.

Right now, the most overt and obvious voter suppression is being carried out by Big Tech platforms such as Facebook, Google, Twitter and YouTube, but similar censorship is also being undertaken by Microsoft, Apple, Vimeo and other tech giants. These companies are granted aid and comfort by numerous left-wing cities and states which often grant these companies property tax deferments and legal protections against legitimate investigations or prosecutions. In other words, states like California are actively protecting the Big Tech platforms that are suppressing voter participation via politically-targeted censorship. And this puts California in violation of Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Furthermore, President Trump can arrest and imprison all state and federal judges who have granted “aid or comfort” to insurrectionists by, for example, releasing them without charge after they were arrested for participating in riots or assaulting law enforcement officers. This means all Soros-funded District Attorneys and anti-America judges who have supported the insurrection can now be arrested and removed from office in one fell swoop.

Remember that Democrat officials in Oregon, Washington, California, New York, Illinois and other states have overtly granted protections — and in some cases, actual funding — to Black Lives Matter terrorists. This means these officials are complicit in “rebellion” against the United States. Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment states that they cannot hold any public office, “civil or military.” Here’s the language: (emphasis added)

No Person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.

Finally, Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment says, “…neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States.” This means that cities and states which are suffering extreme economic losses due to their support for rioting and insurrection — such as Portland, Seattle, Los Angeles, Chicago, New York, etc.) — cannot make any claim to federal money to reimburse them for their losses.

Their losses have been incurred as a result of their support for acts of insurrection and rebellion against the United States, and thus the United States has no obligation to reimburse them for such losses.

All this explains why Nancy Pelosi recently declared President Trump and the GOP to be “enemies of the state.” This is the kind of language that would only be used by the Speaker of the House if they intend to attempt a violent coup followed by mass exterminations of their political opponents:

To initiate all this, Trump merely needs to officially declare an insurrection is under way

The reason Democrats went insane when Trump won the 2016 election is because holding the office of the presidency grants that person access to all the powers that the U.S. Constitution (and subsequent law) confers to the president. One of those powers is the power to declare an insurrection against the government. Such a declaration unleashes enormous powers of government which are then directed by the president against the domestic enemies which are waging war against the United States.

It is now rather obvious that we are already in that war, which is being waged by radical, extreme left-wing terrorists on a nightly basis. That war is supported and aided by the tech giants who censor all critics of the insurrectionists while aiding their acts of treason by allowing their platforms to be used to coordinate attacks against America.

Left-wing mayors, governors, judges, state representatives and other oath-swearing officials are also openly engaged in insurrection against the United States, and Trump’s declaration of an open insurrection will enable them all to be arrested and removed from power.

This is what Trump must do to save America. It is unlikely that he will declare an insurrection before the election, however. This action seems likely to occur after the election.

Why Trump should declare an insurrection the day before the election

Strategically speaking, we urge President Trump to declare the insurrection before the election, because this would allow him to challenge the Electoral College votes from states which are supporting open rebellion against the United States (for all the reasons noted above). Even if Trump declares the insurrection just one day before the election, this grants him a basis from which he may challenge the Electoral College votes from insurrectionist states like California.

It also grants Trump the opportunity to arrest all the corrupt, left-wing officials the day after the election, shutting down their criminal attempts to counterfeit ballots after the fact that try to “win” by cheating in the weeks following the election itself. Trump can largely shut down that effort by simply declaring an insurrection and arresting all these treasonous actors the day after the election. They cannot counterfeit more ballots, after all, if they’re sitting in jail.

This action would, of course, cause the radical Left to ignite an attempted nationwide kinetic war against the government, but at that point Trump is free to issue escalated engagement orders for federal law enforcement while even bringing in the U.S. military to halt all domestic enemies of the United States who are engaged in acts of treason or warfare against America (deploying the military to defeat domestic enemies of America does not violate Posse Comitatus).

Remember when I told you a year ago that when martial law comes to America, you will beg for it? Now you understand why. When the radical Left unleashes yet more violence, arson, looting, property destruction and anarchy across America, most reasonable Americans will fully support temporarily martial law and even military action on the streets of America to clean out the insurrectionists and restore civility to this nation.

Trump also has the NDAA, signed into law by Obama to imprison Americans who opposed the Clinton regime

The Fourteenth Amendment is the key to all this. But alongside it, don’t forget that Barack Obama signed into law the NDAA which was intended to be handed over to Hillary Clinton as a weapon against patriots and conservatives. Now, that government weapon is in the hands of Trump, and he can deploy it against communist sympathizers and treasonous insurrectionists.

In fact, some of the FEMA camp activity being widely reported now, I believe, is actually all about gearing up these camps to house left-wing traitors who are arrested en masse in the coming months. These irrational, insane, lawless lunatics cannot be rehabilitated to rejoin civil society. At best, the nation will have to warehouse them in prison camps for an extended period of time.

In the same way that you can’t teach a pigeon to play chess, and you can’t teach a pig to sing, you can’t teach a Leftist how to function in civil society. They no longer operate in the realms of reason, civility, fairness or freedom. All they know us authoritarianism and violence, which explains why they will have to be isolated from society for the rest of their lives. This is what their parents, school teachers and college professors taught them, of course: How to be crybullies and terrorists, not how to function as reasonable citizens in a free society.

Why Democrats will fail to destroy America, but succeed in destroying their own cities and states

Despite their best efforts to bring this nation to its knees, Democrats are going to fail in their attempts to destroy America. They will succeed, however, in gutting their own cities and causing an economic implosion that will see most of America’s left-wing cities plunged into Third World status over the next five years. California can barely even keep the lights on as it is. Just wait until they come up $100 billion short for this year’s budget and can’t force Trump to bail them out with federal money. The mass government layoffs and pension slashing efforts are about to begin in Democrat-run states like New York and California. It will be brutal, and any income earner who has the ability to flee such states is already in the process of bugging out, leaving behind ghost town cities filled with criminals, homeless people, left-wing terrorists and impoverished welfare recipients.

Ultimately, Democrats will end up imploding and destroying their own future. After the failed insurrection attempt, the Democrat party will be disbanded, and thousands of former Democrat officials will either be dead or imprisoned. This is the fate they have chosen, since they refuse to live in peace with people who have different political views. (Exactly when did “coexist” become “kill all Republicans?”)

Trump is in charge, and he has numerous “secret weapons” to deploy against the treasonous Dems, as I explain in this important podcast:

How to survive the escalating civil war

The war for November’s election is just one small chapter in the much larger war against America and humanity. In addition to the war to destroy America, there is a global war to exterminate the human race and depopulate the planet.

This war is tied into the COVID-19 vaccines, which are being engineered to achieve global depopulation through infertility and death.

[...]

Just because Trump wins doesn’t mean the Democrats won’t make our lives a living hell for as long as they can. Expect nationwide attacks on the power grid, food supplies, fuel infrastructure and telecommunications in the months ahead. Plus, the treasonous tech giants will continue to escalate their illegal censorship efforts to silence all pro-America voices while amplifying voices of terrorism and communism.

Things are about to get real interesting. Get prepared or you won’t survive it. If you thought 2020 was bad so far, this party has only just begun, folks.

#FourteenthAmendment

#ElectoralCollege

#Insurrection

#Trump2020

Share before they take it down!!!