#twitterheader

[levexer]

Reblog or like if saved and/or used

[yirenistt]

[megabuild]

though tbf what do you even do as a mcyttwt user who mains etho because so much of mcyttwt seems to revolve around the same 3 jokes and trying for cc notices meanwhile etho logs on twice a year to announce like family illnesses and his pc spontaneously exploding the fuck are you meant to do with that

[riottsrph]

ᯓ ⠀⠀ FREE CONTENT ⠀ : ⠀ BILLIE HEADERS ⠀⠀!

four ( 4 ) billie eilish twitter headers inspired by the hit me hard and soft album. i don't know if these would be liked here, but i figured why not try !!

like / reblog if you use please.

do not repost or claim as your own.

CLICK FOR HIGH QUALITY.

[shovson]

yeah nah fics are going private again

[deathlonging]

the virulent way ppl react to the most arbitrary twitter disk horses is enough to make you think no one has ever tried and failed to talk to friends or family about their interests lmao

[onlinetwunk]

Okay yes, I’m a tumblr user not a twitter head… I embrace my roots!!!

[hadesoftheladies]

alright, some misogynist and ableist goons on this site keep bothering me about my jkr post because they cannot fathom the fact that calling out bias doesn't necessarily equal endorsing. so i'm going to be super nice about it and put all the facts here for the fact-enjoyers.

let's go over the claims made against jkr by testerical twitterheads, because everything to do with trans politics regarding jkr is just extremist white liberals reaching.

Claim: JK Rowling is friends with Matt Walsh. False!

Claim: JK Rowling is friends with Kellie-Jay Keen. Ambiguous! (She has agreed with Kellie-Jay Keen on several issues and advocated for her based on false allegations about nazism concerning Kellie-Jay Keen. Men-rights activists made shit up about her endorsing nazi salutes at her women's campaign. also, JK Rowling has agreed with many people whose politics she does not wholly endorse, like matt walsh. agreeing with someone on an opinion or fact, does not mean you agree with their politics.)

Claim: JK Rowling denies the Holocaust. False! (For proof, see this thread. JK Rowling does not DENY that the Holocaust happened, but that trans people were specifically targeted by the Nazis. Some argue that this makes her a Holocaust denier based on some German article, but I find the term muddies the water. It can be an offense, a grievous one, to deny the Nazis did something when they did, but calling JKR a Holocaust denier makes people think she doesn't believe the Holocaust happened when she absolutely does.

Additionally, the topic as to whether trans people were explicitly targeted by Nazis has had a fair share of scholarly debate. They may have faced some measure of harassment, but being specifically targeted is also a reach considering how little historical evidence we have of transvestites being outrightly persecuted, at least, to anywhere near the same degree homosexual, black or Jewish people were. Cross-dressing certificates were legal in Nazi Germany, for example, and I have found no record of a transvestite suffering things like forced sterilization. This article briefly mentions a German author who thought that the Nazis would finally take care of "the transvestite problem" because now they could be sent to concentration camps and castrated there, but there is still no record of any transvestite having undergone such a thing. Furthermore, of the examples of transvestites that were taken to concentration camps, both of them were homosexual, so it would be more accurate to say they were targeted for being homosexual, especially when you look at why they were arrested. On the other hand, some transvestites ended up in concentration camps, but it was likely due to the fact that they were Jewish rather than trans.

It is also very significant that in the German Republic, transvestites had permits while homosexuals did not!

JKR might be denying that they burned trans books. Unfortunately for her, she is wrong. Transvestite research WAS targeted by the Nazis. Again, not much is known about transvestites during this time and I have found no solid numbers. It most definitely didn't happen on the same scale as what gay, lesbian, Jewish or Roma people were suffering through--and why would it, transvestites weren't a large population, also i have found no record of transvestites being forced to wear pink triangles, like homosexual men were--, though gay men and transvestites seemed to get more leniency if they were "Aryan." )

Claim: JK Rowling directly funds government suppression. (Which government? Source? I'll make an assumption and guess that you're referring to her 1 million pound donation to the Better Together anti-Scottish independence campaign? Yes, she has. But she respects the opinions of those who disagree with her on the subject. She's also donated to the Labour Party, which is more centre-left politically.)

Claim: JK Rowling has financially supported groups that repress Scotland's right to independence. True! (She also voted "No!" on Scottish independence).

Claim: JK Rowling is gunning to be a Neo-Nazi. False! (She has not expressed any explicit Nazi views! Please tap the source to see what Nazi views actually are! JK Rowling has been explicitly leftist in her politics and anti-racist.)

Claim: JK Rowling is a fascist. False! (She does not identify as fascist and does not have any explicit fascist views. Unlike the people burning and trying to ban her books, which contain very little of her politics.)

i don't worship JKR, i don't even agree with a good chunk of her politics. especially when it comes to her sympathy for israel. she's a millionaire white woman, and i am a born and raised african middle-class person. we won't have many politics in common. but unlike you lot, i don't need to be misogynistic or ableist in order to disagree with a woman. resorting to misogyny, ableism, racism or homophobia just because you hate someone is still misogyny, ableism, racism and homophobia. i wouldn't call a transperson the "t-word" even though i don't profess their gender faith. because i recognize that using the "t-word" on a trans-identified person that's done or said disgusting things like, idk, andrea long chu or hunter schaffer (are these your leaders? seriously?), saying that word will still hurt trans-identified people who didn't do or say those horrible things unnecessarily.

see what i did there? i read things up for myself, added sources from people i disagreed with politically, discussed the valid history of people who i disagree with without resorting to dehumanizing language, and called out the celebrity you lot think are "my hero" without being a hypocrite!

class dismissed.

now fuck off you rancid misogynists and go back to snivelling about how righteous you are to your echo chamber.

also, radblr girlies feel free to reblog or link this for all the anti-jkr posts that make any of these claims or keep trying to bait you with this braindead discourse to save yourselves the effort. love you and muah! :)

[levexer]

Reblog or like if saved and/or used

[xdreamie]

reddit always complains about shit WHO GAF ABOUT THEIR OPINION…majority are twitterheads anyway

[yirenistt]

[megabuild]

same thing as xbs whole AI fiasco like "my dog just died and i want to make AI art of him can you leave me alone" huh....... some of these guys hate criticism and just want to be right all the time

thing is that they're going up against twitterheads who also just want to be right all the time except instead of right with themselves it's right in the eyes of their peers who are all also constantly looking to each other for reasons to push them down and prove themselves as better. like i think that ai generating an image of your pet is sort of fucking lame and doesn't really help any situation at all just use a photo. but at the same time being a teenager on twitter and thinking "i NEED to tell this man whose dog just died that he's singlehandedly ruining the art industry" is extremely lame. at least though you have the excuse of being a teenager on twitter, one of the most harrowing experiences a person can have without breaking the law

[biro-slay]

Wow Twitter sucks more every time I go there

For those who don't know(which is probably every one of mutual), there's been a drama in the VGC community(VGC, Video game championship, is a form of competitive Pokemon playing) about a person by the name of Neil VGC. This is the photo that started it

I think the big people took it really well, a lot of poketubers are good allies, and they all took a stance against Neil. But guess who fucking didn't - Twitterheads.

I quote some of the replies to the post/comments on the post "saying you personally don't support something but won't say it out loud is shameful? What?" Looking at their later comments, yeah they just don't like trans people, they also said "you get so hostile over every little disagreement"

There are a lot more people, but the one that broke me was "Don’t you think it’s a little bit centralizing and oppressive, possibly even hypocritical, to force everyone to share the same opinion regarding transgender people?". Like, first of all, trans people aren't forcing anyone to "agree with them" or something (unlike transphobic people who force trans people to not transition but whatever). But also, no???? Letting people live their life, and not calling their existence a mental illness, should idk, probably be common sense or something? Do you not think that?

[teddykaczynski]

dreading my conflict resolution class a bit today well perhaps dreading is a strong word but the professor is like. i feel like the best way to describe him is like centrist between liberal and leftist, he says he was an anarchist when he was younger but nowadays hes more realistic i guess. well hes a 65+ year old man that is devoted to studying and teaching peace and conflict resolution so. i think his perspective is valuable and im learning from him but whats frustrating is…. my classmates who are like super left twitterheads. the prof will say something that is neutral on a topic like saying he understands this side but also that it’s unrealistic to expect the other side to just accept or whatever because he has to remain understanding and neutral as part of the way he approaches CR but this means he’ll essentially “defend” an institution that has been decided by left to be Wholly Evil You Are Evil IF You Defend Them and so i have to listen to several 20-30 year olds that dont understand nuance or holding your tongue argue with a man whose goals are the best outcome possible for everyone involved and not political points

[robotlyra]

The fact that some people are responding to Hbomberguy's plagiarism video with complaints that he's "just not funny" is the most spectacular demonstration of his final thesis- Youtube Content Churn leads to incentivizing theft, which is a greater symptom of capitalist devaluation of the arts- that I feel like slow clapping

Man spends a year making a very careful video prosecution of a major youtuber's intellectual thefts, extensively researched and evidence-backed, with other examples to support his criteria of claims, concluded with a pledge to use the video profits to compensate those who've been plagiarized because of his commitment to not wanting to incentivize "drama and callout content", and ending with encouragement to all artists and creatives out there to keep pursuing their own integrity, because it means something important in these uncertain times...

and some irony-poisoned twitterhead can only complain that he didn't make them laugh.

[goatedgreen]

im so glad im tumblr-brained in a world of tiktokkers and twitterheads because it allowed me to make the most horrible women OCs without a hint of shame. these women are awful and i love them