Tumgik
#there are only two characters who are currently enacting societal change on a large scale and disrupting the previous order
Text
‘daenerys will sacrifice herself at the end’ is something i am sick of seeing
this young female character has been set up by george as a very very progressive ruler who is hellbent on on making lasting societal change
a young female ruler who has the power to make this change, a young female ruler who truly cares about her cause
and yet people want her story to end with her death? how would this ending be thematically consistent? how would this ending benefit the common people in any way?
the people spouting this nonsense always prattle on about how the targaryens being in power at the end of the story is just a continuation of the old power structure
as if asoiaf is some black and white story where the old power structure either resumes or there’s going to be some sort of peaceful democracy after the targaryens are gone
like be so ffr
george has always been upfront that he’s interested in the choices of individuals and how his characters choices can shape the world they live in. so why would he throw away this young female ruler who’s currently smashing the slave trade that has been around for thousands of years in order to go for this bland message that her death will mark the end of the previous power structure?
when i put it that way i am astonished by how stupid it sounds
so, if you actually want societal change in westeros and essos then you better pray every single night that daenerys doesn’t die :)
140 notes · View notes