#the software even allows for self-submissions before submitting to the instructor. once i submit to the instructor that's it
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
turns out my logic class has the most convoluted fucking software known to mankind for its assignments. i've spent the past hour just trying to make sense of it. i'm pretty sure i've got it, but also like.....................why lol
#speculation nation#im being a good student and ive already read the syllabus and done the quiz and started with the software stuff#i dont think i wanna start on the actual coursework yet bc im kinda fed up with it rn. but i have 4 more days to get to it.#gonna complete at least assignment 1 tomorrow. and then there's a 2nd assignment due by the end of the week.#to be expected for an 8 week course. it's heavier than a normal course's semester.#but also it's a fuckin level 100 course. so as long as i put in the time to read and watch the videos and do the assignments correctly#i'll be fine.#the software even allows for self-submissions before submitting to the instructor. once i submit to the instructor that's it#but i can submit to myself as many times as i want. and it'll grade it for me.#so i can have it check my work as Much as i want. so long as i do submit to the instructor within the time limit.#it's strangely forgiving. but such is a level 100 course i guess.#now if only the software wasnt so goddamn confusing................but oh well lol
1 note
·
View note
Text
RISE
REFLECT
My experience in the previous course was a positive one. The course started off a bit “rocky” as at first I did not have the software downloaded which caused me to turn in assignments late. I also “missed” an assignment because I did not see the due date for it since I at first was going by the due dates in the portal and did not initially view the Course-At-A-Glance. Once I straightened everything out though the course went more smoothly and I was better equipped to learn the concepts.
INQUIRE
I wonder if I would be more successful in this program if I not only applied the feedback from my peers and my instructor, but if I also was able to create a “schedule,” or find a way to designate certain days and times to work on assignments to lessen the stress and workload a bit.
SUGGEST
For me, I think the best thing going forward is to use an agenda to map out the due dates of my projects, so I avoid turning in late assignments and losing points.
ELEVATE
Going out and buying an agenda and writing out all of my assignments and due dates and scheduling days and times to work on each assignment in the agenda will really help me stay on track and be more organized, which will help improve the quality of my work and my grades.
INSTRUCTOR FEEDBACK FROM PREVIOUS COURSE:
Week 3.1.2 Project:
Mindy, the following feedback is based on the grading rubric that was from the assignment:
Travel Poster: Expertise: 35/35
You did a good job in explaining your reasoning for why you built each poster the way you did, incorporating knowledge learned from the Saltz (2013) presentation tutorial. Your self-reflection was fun to read, and explained more about your “story” in this creative process. I also noticed how well you followed your peers’ advice. That last picture was excellent, and popped far better – a result of your active participation in your community of practice!
Discussion Board Postings – Accuracy and Persuasiveness: 20/25
Your reflections gave us all insight as to your thinking processes and as to what you would do better. Your postings were backed by quotes from the Saltz (2013) presentations, and were clear and concise.
-Always proof before you post, looking for punctuation, grammatical and spelling errors.
-Please refer to the APA Guide in Connect concerning YouTube and Lynda.com in-text citations and references.
-Never use the first name of an author as part of an in-text citation.
-Never separate the author’s last name from the year of publication, unless you have used the author’s name and year of publication already in the paragraph.
Travel Poster: Creativity: 13/20
Image #1: The title font should be larger, creating better hierarchy. The “stats” are too small and should be made larger. They should also be placed in the same middle third of the picture, drawing the eyes to the URL. The overall type needs to “pop” more.
Image #2: If you were to squint your eyes and look at this poster, you would find the black type disappears and the yellow stays. The black type does not pop enough; This causes the eyes to jump all through the “stats”. Not enough good hierarchy taking place.
Image #3: The title needs to be larger and move up into the sunlight. Doing so would provide needed hierarchy.
Final Image: Now this is far more like it! The changes you made allow the type to pop far better than the original one. Well done!
Discussion Board Postings: Collaboration: 20/20
I like how you engaged your discussion with your classmates. I could tell that you used the RISE model as a heading to the paragraphs. Your comments were helpful, and uplifting. Moving forward, though, use correct APA in-text citations by following the examples in the APA Guide found in Connect.
Week 3.2.2 Project:
Mindy, the following feedback is based on the grading rubric that was from this assignment:
Part One: 35/40
I can tell that you have been doing the readings and viewing the tutorials, but I would like to see more synthesizing and summarizing on your part, rather than just give quote after quote after quote.
Part Two: 21/30
I am glad that you could make changes to what Mordy Golding did. You actually made his look better! Thank you for your perseverance! Your hard work is paying off! Please look over the comments below and apply them to future postings.
-Please refer to the APA Guide in Connect concerning YouTube and Lynda.com in-text citations.
-Never use the first name of an author as part of an in-text citation.
-When using in-text citations, the “period��� comes after the citation. Here is an example, “When using direct quotes in in-text citations, be sure to place the ‘period’ after the in-text citation at the end of the sentence” (McBride, 2015).
-Always proof before you post, looking for punctuation, grammatical and spelling errors =-1pts;
Part Three: 26/30
You gave good feedback to Justin. However, I would like to see you base your feedback more on what the tutorials and readings have to say. This is what is meant by “critical feedback”. If not, the feedback comes across strictly as opinion.
Week 3.3-4.2 Project:
Mindy, the following feedback is based on the grading rubric that was from this assignment:
Visual Design: 26/20
Your “Total Energy” tab’s title reverts to the original title. Also, on slide 2, you show “11.7” twice. This is confusing. Also, the light bulb is a bit washed out with part of it being against the white star. You also need to be consistent with the use of upper and lower case in your tab titles.
Narration: 20/25
The narration is in sync with the slides, but it sounds like you should practice it to make it smoother. There are some hesitations where there shouldn’t be. You will also want to add more expression as well. One the Solar and Wind energy slides, you should only discuss each one separately.
Technical: 10/15
The labels of the legend you created on the “US renewable energy generation” slide, are white against a light green background. That does not allow enough contrast. Your “Top Countries” slide’s background graphic bleeds through, marring the charts you show. The type used in the titles of your charts in the “Top Countries” slide is not consistent. You also need to tell us what “Image Source” refers to as well as list the EDM533 Resource Folder for the other pictures used.
Creativity: 15/15
Very creative use of the background flag and in creating the legend. Very original! Well done!
Collaboration: 23/25
I like how you interact with your peers! :-) You are a natural in knowing how to combine the wisdom you have gained from your past experiences and job knowledge and in applying them to “lift” your present cohort of classmates. Your feedback would have been even stronger had you directly referenced Saltz and Golding.
· -You were two days late in posting your response to the first response = -20pts;
· -Always proof before you post, looking for punctuation, grammatical and spelling errors =-3pts;
· Had your first submission not been two days late, you would have received a 91%. Please do not sacrifice anymore points by submitting your work late as you move through the program.
IMPLEMENTATION OF INSTRUCTOR FEEDBACK:
After reviewing all of the instructor’s feedback from the previous course and considering how to implement the feedback that was given, I have decided that it is best for me to make sure I have thoroughly reviewed the Course-At-A-Glance and have mapped out my deadlines for each of the assignments and projects. Also, I plan to “play around” some more with Illustrator and experiment with other fonts and color pallets, so that way I can get a better grasp on the design concepts and are better equipped to use Illustrator’s tools, which are needed to successfully design presentations.
This was the infographic that we had to recreate using Adobe Illustrator, while following tutorials on Lynda.com that were presented by Mordy Golding.
This is a revised version of a travel poster that I did based on feedback from my peers using the RISE Model of Evaluation.
0 notes