#the queer review 80 for brady

[thequeereview]

Golden Girls Just Wanna Have Fun - Film Review: 80 For Brady ★★★1/2

Stepping out of a wet New York winter’s afternoon, it didn’t take long for this lovingly woven comfort blanket of a movie—think The Golden Girls meets a gentler version of The Hangover—to warm me and my big gay heart. Inspired by a true story, 80 For Brady, follows four women, each portrayed by a screen legend—Lou (Lily Tomlin), Trish (Jane Fonda), Maura (Rita Moreno), and Betty (Sally…

[upalldown]

Charli XCX - Charli

Third studio album from the English electro popstar produced by A.G. Cook

8/13

Long before she had firsthand experience with pop music’s star-making assembly line, songwriting camps, and royalty splits, 14-year-old Charli XCX thought that people made music because they were brainwashed by robots. “Who writes the songs/The machines do,” she sings with bug-eyed terror on her unreleased 2008 debut, 14. The lyrics are a little ridiculous, but Charli wasn’t exactly wrong in the assumption that there are complex mechanisms lurking behind most chart-topping songs. She witnessed them in the 2010s, after she signed to a major label and began penning hits for Icona Pop and Iggy Azalea, content to give her most straightforward pop songs to others. On her own albums, whether the gothic True Romance, the punky Sucker, or the avant-garde Pop 2, she subverted mainstream pop conventions, projecting the image of a rave-happy club kid. Always at Charli’s core was the contradiction of loving pop music, yet needing to rebel against the pop machine.

Her third studio album, Charli, invites back many of Pop 2’s contributors, as if hoping to recapture its predecessor’s magic. But the record feels conflicted about its intentions. Take Lizzo-featuring “Blame It On Your Love,” a reworking of Pop 2’s transcendent “Track 10” that loses its impact by trading dial-up screeches for a widely appealing, Stargate-produced EDM drop and a dembow-inflected groove. This and the frivolous yet fun chart-pop song “1999” (featuring Troye Sivan) don’t jell with the rest of Charli’s warped club tracks and intimate ballads. Like many self-titled albums, it’s a reflection of the artist: in Charli’s case, one who wants to veer down experimental, transgressive, and queer pathways but constantly contemplates what it would be like to fully enter the mainstream.

Much of Charli’s sound is an extension of the corrosive electronics on Pop 2, with producer A. G. Cook at the helm of both. He and his PC Music cohorts (Planet 1999, umru) embrace the synthetic and shiny: Glossy, arena-sized ’80s rock drums, rippling power synths, squeaky J-pop arrangements, and the relentlessly positive sound of Swedish Eurodance are repurposed and exaggerated, evoking the eerie sheen of a hyper-realistic 3D render. On “Shake It,” Charli’s voice is manipulated to sound like bubbling water, before the track is infiltrated by a small army of collaborators including Big Freedia, CupcakKe, Pabllo Vittar, and Brooke Candy, like a futuristic remake of Busta Rhymes’ infamous posse cut “Touch It (Remix).” The beat sounds like someone furiously clanging on boiler room pipes, transforming a nasty strip club track into a soundtrack for mutiny. The credits for “Click,” which ends with a montage of jagged and distorted SOPHIE-like sounds not dissimilar to farts, name 100 gecs’ Dylan Brady as responsible for “harsh noise.” Compared to the bouncy electro-pop of “1999” or the trop-pop production of “Warm” (featuring Haim), these moments provide a thrilling adrenaline rush.

Charli’s crisp writing mirrors the vivid production. On “Click,” she turns herself into an onomatopoeic sound effect. The sensory details of “Next Level Charli” establish a scene in seconds: “I go speeding on the highway/Flame burning/Tire screech.” Charli credits Max Martin with teaching her the technique, commonly used by Swedish songwriters, of using words’ natural melody to create catchiness, instead of intentionally rhyming. Lifting the most effective ideas from different schools of production, she’s able to construct her own mutant strain of pop.

The album’s most potent song is the synth-pop anthem “Gone,” which blends vulnerability with outré sound. Through gritted teeth, Charli describes a party full of people who make her feel alone: “I feel so unstable/Fucking hate these people,” she sings, using the image of ice melting in her fist to illustrate her sense of panic-inducing isolation. In response, Héloïse Letissier of Christine and the Queens poses questions that are somehow relatable in their absurdity: “Am I a smoke?/Am I the sun?/Who decides?” Letissier’s abstractions are the foil to Charli’s concrete lyrics: The former evokes the spiraling crisis of the mind, the latter the blood-boiling anger that rises in the body.

Together, Charli and Letissier reach a cathartic breaking point, a rattling breakdown filled with frosty percussion, dramatic synth stabs, and stuttering vocal chops. In a recent i-D interview, Letissier asserts that Charli’s musical aesthetic, which she describes as a “hybrid” of club experimentation and earworm pop, is “deeply queer.” But in “Gone,” Charli invites another hypothesis for why her music has become so beloved by the LGBTQ+ community: Her ability to evocate a profound sense of unbelonging. When “Gone” explodes, it sounds like two people shattering the box that confined them.

Charli’s goal is self-examination—a new step for Charli, who’s better known for her up-tempo hedonistic bangers than her emotional deep cuts. Throughout the album, she pinpoints the source of her anxieties, investigating her relationships with substances, with her romantic partner, and with herself. She does this with heart-wrenching specificity on the ballad “Thoughts,” when, in a drugged-out stupor, she wonders if her friends are genuine. And on the electro-bop “February 2017,” featuring Clairo and Yaeji, she recaptures “Track 10”’s candor. “Sorry ’bout Grammy night/Was lying on my mind/Was in a different place/Tortured and drifting by,” she sings to her partner. So when “Official” arrives, it feels breathtakingly hopeful, as Charli sings of the little details (breakfast in bed, a magical kiss) that make her love real. Charli uncovers a singer-songwriter unafraid to display the cracks in her facade, crafting a striking portrait of what happens when a robot glitches.

https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/charli-xcx-charli/

[payprosalaska]

Companies Urge High Court to Ban LGBTQ Discrimination

​More than 200 businesses signed a brief on July 2 calling on the Supreme Court to rule that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The companies represent more than 7 million employees and more than $5 trillion in revenue and include household names such as General Motors, Marriott International Inc. and The Walt Disney Company, plus several in the tech sector.

This fall, the Supreme Court will hear three cases that address the extent to which Title VII protects lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) individuals.

Patrick Brady, director, policy engagement for the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), said, “While many employers have already adopted inclusive anti-discrimination policies, SHRM is encouraged that the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear three cases which will provide more clarity on this important issue. At a time when both Congress and the courts are struggling with this question, having finality on the interpretation of Title VII’s protections from the Court will be helpful.”

We’ve rounded up articles from SHRM Online and other trusted news sources on the Title VII cases before the Supreme Court.

Review Granted in Three Cases

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the cases Zarda v. Altitude Express, where the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held that Title VII bans sexual orientation discrimination; Bostock v. Clayton County, Ga., where the 11th Circuit held that Title VII does not ban sexual orientation discrimination; and EEOC v. R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc.¸ where the 6th Circuit decided that Title VII prohibits transgender discrimination.

(SHRM Online)

Equality Act

The U.S. House of Representatives passed the Equality Act on May 17, which would explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sex, sexual orientation and gender identity in employment, housing, public accommodations, education, federal funding, credit and the jury system under federal law. The Senate will now consider the bill but isn’t expected to pass it.

(SHRM Online)

Business Opposition to Retraction of Transgender Rights

The July 2 brief isn’t the first time businesses have called on greater rights for LGBTQ individuals. In 2018, more than 50 companies urged the U.S. federal government to uphold protections for transgender individuals in a letter opposing actions by the Trump administration to limit those protections. The letter noted that more than 80 percent of Fortune 500 companies have gender identity protections and two-thirds have transgender-inclusive health care coverage.

(SHRM Online)

State Law Prohibitions on LGBTQ Discrimination

Even if the Supreme Court declines to recognize LGBT discrimination as a form of sex discrimination under Title VII, employers must still comply with state and local laws relating to employment discrimination. “Know the laws of your city, county and state of operation and comply,” said Nonnie Shivers, an attorney with Ogletree Deakins in Phoenix. These laws can be nuanced and afford different protections. For instance, some states have created protections only for public employees. Other states and localities prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression—but not all three.

(SHRM Online)

Oral Arguments Scheduled

Oral arguments in the cases before the Supreme Court on the extent of Title VII’s coverage have been scheduled for Oct. 8. While the Obama administration supported treating LGBTQ discrimination claims as sex discrimination prohibited by Title VII, the Trump administration’s Justice Department has argued that the law was not intended to provide protection to gay or transgender employees.

(Fortune)

//window.fbAsyncInit = function() { FB.init({ appId: '649819231827420', xfbml: true, version: 'v2.5' }); };

//(function(d, s, id){ // var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; // if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;} // js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; // js.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js"; // fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); //}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk')); function shrm_encodeURI(s) { return encodeURIComponent(s); } function RightsLinkPopUp() { var url = "https://s100.copyright.com/AppDispatchServlet"; var location = url + "?publisherName=" + shrm_encodeURI("shrm") + "&publication=" + shrm_encodeURI("Legal_Issues") + "&title=" + shrm_encodeURI("Justices Hear ERISA Reimbursement Case") + "&publicationDate=" + shrm_encodeURI("11/11/2015 12:00:00 AM") + "&contentID=" + shrm_encodeURI("6badda72-62e7-49e8-b4bd-ebbd02a72a17") + "&charCnt=" + shrm_encodeURI("7399") + "&orderBeanReset=" + shrm_encodeURI("True"); window.open(location, "RightsLink", "location=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=650,height=550"); } Source link

The post Companies Urge High Court to Ban LGBTQ Discrimination appeared first on consultant pro.