#the american exceptionalism truly one of the most unrealistic things about all of this

[queen-mabs-revenge]

exaggerated salty ted lasso spoilers

also genuinely why would anyone want to move back to the us - missing from rebecca's pitch for why michelle & henry should move to london was the gutted-but-still-somewhat-extant universal healthcare and no active shooter drills at school.

but you know something something barbecue sauce usa usa usa am i right?

[annadfelix-blog]

Aqua Radiant Cream

Aqua Radiant Cream:-Effectively and Healthy Skin Care Cream!!!

Aqua Radiant Cream The most extraordinary commendation is where someone guesses your daughter is your sister. Nonetheless, for most women, that is authentically not a run of the mill occasion. Regardless, with the help of something like Aqua Radiant Cream . it could be. With your as of late found youth and nonappearance of wrinkles, you'll be addressing about this astonishing skin cream to everyone you know! Getting fiery, perfect skin shouldn't be problematic with the help of a five star skin cream. Regardless, is Aqua Radiant Cream your best choice? Keep scrutinizing our Aqua Radiant Cream Review to find! Something different, click on the flag underneath to see the primary foe of developing cream while supplies last!

Aqua Radiant Cream Skincare is the perfect against developing cream that could work to oust your wrinkles unequivocally! If your eyes are speedily pulled in to the lines in your face when you look in the mirror, potentially now is the open door you need to reveal an improvement. With a jump forward skincare thing, you could revive your adolescence and avert age longer! Nevertheless, is the Aqua Radiant Cream Skin your best other option? Or of course could our fundamental foe of developing serum work by a long shot better than get you results? Snap on the image or catch underneath to take a gander at the things and see what works best for you!

What Is Aqua Radiant Cream?

Aqua Radiant Cream are healthy skin items produced to assist you with killing any indications of maturing. This cream consolidates both noteworthy lotions and bolster cell reinforcements to give and renew skin composition the missing supplements in your matured skin.

This equation is planned with an aim to make the skin firm and tight and forestall skin hanging brought about by maturing skin. Then again, the serum offers a perfect answer for a sensitive skin, which is normal with matured skin.

This treatment helps in clearing harmed skin cells and furthermore flaws on the skin. It's acceptable to take note of that this equation is yet to be tried on the creatures. In any case, the formulators have broadly utilized it on a counterfeit skin to delineate its viability.

Aqua Radiant Cream is made by an American organization by the name Rollon Skin Care Ltd. The organization is one of the main makers and venders of top notch items that significantly tackle maturing issues of the skin.

Aqua Radiant Cream are new and progressive items that are professed to offer a superior option in contrast to inpatient and plastic medical procedure. It is said to include a blend of regular fixings that have strong cell reinforcements and renewing supplements that work to help an energetic and great skin appearance.

How Aqua Radiant Cream Works?

The Aqua Radiant Cream is professed to be a skin unrest as it gives moment hydration help, sustenance, flexibility reclamation, solidness, wrinkles end, barely recognizable differences decrease, and obviously more youthful skin just as fixes, reestablishes, renews, restores your skin btw that appears to be unrealistic. Its professed to work at the cell level as far as fortifying the normal structure just as by de-blocking the dermal grid. All you've to do is wash your face, apply a limited quantity of the cream on your neck and back rub then your skin will assimilate it for the supernatural occurrence. It contains regular fixings without any fillers or synthetic concoctions. The maker made an excessive number of cases yet didn't give any proof to back them up.

Instructions to Use Aqua Radiant Cream

While the Aqua Radiant Cream hopes to empower you to diminish the nearness of wrinkles and improve the vibe of your skin, you should finish two or three things to envision further less than ideal developing. Here are two or three hints to ensure that you are getting your most valuable skin:

Guarantee Your Skin – If you will contribute some vitality outside, make a point to put on sunscreen to shield your skin from further mischief.

Get The Right Nutrients – Eating a great deal of terrible sustenance won't benefit your skin's. Try eating increasingly beneficial sustenances to check whether that has any kind of effect

Go Bare – Try clearing your beauty care products and going uncovered when in doubt to permit your to skin unwind.

Where To Buy Aqua Radiant Cream?

Aqua Radiant Cream Numerous people wonder where to buy Aqua Radiant Cream. Additionally, you have two options. In case you need Aqua Radiant Cream explicitly, you can find the Official Aqua Radiant Cream Site for yourself! Something different, if you have to endeavor our top foe of developing cream, you can click any image or catch on this page to start. In any case, whatever you do, don't respite or things could sell out. Snap any image on this page to check whether our principle skin cream can make you address about your youth and without wrinkle skin!

Step by step instructions to Apply Aqua Radiant Cream:

You should initially wash your face appropriately and afterward begin applying an exceptionally modest quantity of this cream arrangement all over once in the first part of the day and again around evening time. You should utilize a similar system for in any event a month to get the ideal outcomes.

Is it safe to Use:

Truly, it is 100% safe to utilize the Aqua Radiant Cream all over, as it is a characteristic recipe whose fixings are clinically demonstrated and demonstrated to be successful and alright for a quality skin tone. You will never need to confront any symptoms while applying the equivalent.

Aqua Radiant Cream Review – Final Verdict

Aqua Radiant Cream are progressive healthy skin items produced to assist you with clearing maturing signs while saturating your skin all through. These two recipes are first engrossing and highlight dynamic characteristic fixings that work to convey the guaranteed advantages.

They help to renew skin composition and upgrade skin immovability to forestall skin drooping brought about by development. Moreover, it offers supplements that your skin requires for its sound look.

As a client before settling on purchasing these items it's huge that you visit the item's site where you will discover progressively about the items, and possibly some data might not have been caught in this survey.

Be that as it may, there are numerous other contender items available that are said to fill a similar need as Aqua Radiant Cream . In this manner, inquire about on them and think about them intently and select the item that you feel will work to satisfy the requirements of your skin.

As we age the piece, surface and presence of our skin changes. Indications of skin maturing incorporate wrinkles, barely recognizable differences, loss of dampness, lopsided tone and dull, tired-looking skin. There are incalculable enemy of wrinkle creams available promising to cause skin look and to feel more youthful. Numerous enemy of wrinkle creams guarantee everything shy of a facelift or to give the much looked for after "wellspring of youth". In all actuality most are simply lotions promoted as hostile to maturing items.

Underneath you'll discover probably the best wrinkle serum/cream definitions available today, as we would see it.

For more details:-http://envyusmoisturizer.com/aqua-radiant-cream/

http://dietforhealth.over-blog.com/aqua-radiant-cream

https://sites.google.com/site/aquaradiantcreamskincare/

https://theprose.com/post/328619/aqua-radiant-cream

https://works.bepress.com/aqua-radiant-cream/1/

http://aqua-radiant-cream.mystrikingly.com/

https://aqua-radiant-cream-72.webself.net/

https://www.facebook.com/Envyusmoisturizer-105997050955261/

https://www.scoop.it/topic/aqua-radiant-cream

https://www.wattpad.com/831448928-aqua-radiant-cream

https://paper.li/e-1579932767#/

[selfdefencetraining]

Sport Scholarships in America

Soccer Scholarship in the USA Everyone is beginning to ask you 'Thus, what is on your mind contemplating?' and the main thing you're believing is 'I need to see the world and play soccer (ideally on a scholarship)!'. Consider the possibility that you could consolidate both. Furthermore, surprisingly better, fulfill your folks by procuring a broadly perceived degree en route? Sounds unrealistic? Indeed, United Sports USA has sent many soccer players to various pieces of the US to seek after their fantasy about voyaging and concentrating on meanwhile playing their beloved game.

Is it safe to say that you are enthusiastic with regards to soccer and couldn't imagine anything better than to be encircled by the best offices, hardware and mentors accessible? Might you want to be important for the American school framework where they are beginning to deliver probably the best soccer players on the planet? Might you want to play at a profoundly serious level and travel all around the US with your kindred partners? Concentrating abroad and turning into an understudy competitor will be probably the greatest test you will confront, however assuming you are a yearning youthful soccer player it is essentially something you can't miss!

The key is to not lounge around and sit tight for a soccer grant to simply occur. Call us or send an email to one of our games experts, every one of whom are previous understudy competitors. Be proactive: apply now and pursue an evaluation game and who can say for sure where it could take you...

Golf grant in the USA

You love Golf. If not you would not have arrived on this page. You likewise love the possibility of acquiring four year certification throughout the following not many years and finding a truly amazing job. The thing is, by getting a golf grant in the USA, you could do both simultaneously!

Observing the ideal grant that suits your requirements is certainly not a simple assignment. This is the place where our experience and aptitude at United Sports USA can ensure you get the perfect arrangement! Playing university golf in the US may sound frightening and invigorating simultaneously, and it ought to! Try not to underrate how much time you will spend on (and off!) the green - reading up for tests and submitting tasks is essentially good enough. Being an understudy competitor is difficult, yet the most remunerating things typically never are. On the off chance that this is the kind of thing you would be keen on seeking after, why not call us or send us an email and converse with one of our staff individuals, we couldn't want anything more than to hear from you or your folks.

Swimming Scholarship in the USA

Assuming you're currently looking into swimming grants that likely implies that you generally know what you will find yourself mixed up with. It's anything but a mysterious that swimming is a very cutthroat game. Your preparation will comprise of early morning meetings in the water and land meetings (generally strength and molding) in the early evening. Going to addresses and having relegated schoolwork over time imply that your days will be completely reserved. Obviously, your responsibility and love for the game should be solid in the event that you need a swimming grant.

As of now, the UK just has 22 Olympic estimated pools for hopeful youthful Olympians to prepare. In examination, in the US there are right now more than 500 swimming projects on offer. Every one of them gloat an Olympic measured pool and five star jumping offices for their understudy competitors. Likewise, there you will profit from ceaseless help from mentors and sports-explicit dieticians and physios. Thus, the University of Michigan, for example, delivered the exceptionally enriched Olympian Michael Phelps.

Do you really want assistance displaying your capacities? Assuming this is the case, go ahead and reach out so we can assist with beginning the interaction.

Rugby Scholarship in the USA

Why on earth would you play and need a rugby grant in the US, you say? Isn't 'American Football' their adaptation of Rugby? Indeed, rugby is one of the quickest developing club sports across school sports grounds, with an expansion in 14% in only two years.

Playing rugby in the American school framework will cause joining the energy you to have for your game just as pursuing a four year certification in your picked field of concentrate very helpful (for the absence of a superior term). You never need to stress over whether you'll have the opportunity to prepare or time to study. Your timetable is explicitly set such that you can figure out how to dominate in both. Does joining on of the 900 school rugby crews (both male and female) appeal to you? Then, at that point, don't spare a moment to get in touch with one of our games experts, every one of whom are ex-understudy competitors themselves.

Tennis Scholarship in the USA

Have you known about Andy Roddick, Arthur Ashe or Althea Gibson? Do you have any idea what they all share practically speaking? They were all understudy competitors at American schools in the beginning phases of their professions. This empowered them to continue to play Tennis at a profoundly serious level meanwhile procuring a broadly perceived degree. A tennis grant that impeccably suits your requirements will carry you one bit nearer to your fantasy.

The thing about universities in the US is that instructional meetings fit around the understudy competitor's timetable. This establishes the ideal climate for understudies to dominate in their game with top notch offices and hardware. Also, it urges and pushes them to dominate scholastically. Their projects are planned so understudies can prevail in both, giving they have the ideal mindset and drive to do as such. Does this seem like something you might want to be a piece of? Then, at that point, go ahead and reach us and converse with one of our (ex-understudy competitor) sports advisors to assist you with beginning the cycle.

Read More: Five Things To Look For in a Dartboard Cabinet

[j-kaiwa]

Discussion Article December 16th

When I Grow Up… Why Only 6 Percent Of Us Achieve Our Childhood Dreams

We all had childhood dreams. Many of us likely wanted to be astronauts, painters, actors, chefs, musicians, firefighters, police, archaeologists (Indiana Jones), teachers, lawyers, doctors or perhaps even the president. Some of us might have been a bit more eccentric and wanted to be orthodontists, paleontologists or even entomologists.

Many adults probably don't even know what an entomologist is. But you can bet your ass that there's a 5-year-old somewhere that really wants to be one, even if he can't pronounce the word.

Indeed, the magical brain of a child perceives the world as an endless array of possibilities.

Yet, a recent study in the academic journal Social Forces has revealed that only 6 percent of adults ended up in the careers they dreamt about as kids.

The study didn't reveal why that is, however. Thus, it's an open question.

Why don't the vast majority of people end up in the careers they wanted when they were kids?

Some might take the negative route, arguing that childhood dreams are ultimately futile. These individuals would likely contend that the world is a harsh place. Tough sh*t. Move on, suck it up and pay the bills.

This is a very narrow way to look at this, however.

Life is full of twists and turns. There are ups and downs, moments of glory and periods of despair. It's all a tenuous balance between the positive and negative. There is no single path to happiness.

If all of our dreams came true, life wouldn't be the beautiful, random and enlightening journey that it is.

Here are five reasons why it's a good thing that most of us don't achieve our childhood dreams:

It makes us realistic.

It's important to have aspirations in life, but in many ways, it's more important to learn how to accept failure.

Life isn't always easy. It's a struggle. But it's through struggle that we grow stronger.

In order to rise, we first have to stumble and fall.

Yes, we all need to have dreams and goals, but we can only know the true extent of our strengths and weaknesses when we falter in pursuit of them.

Success is not achieved by aimlessly stumbling from one accomplishment to the other. It's trial and error; it's victory and defeat.

If we got everything right the first time, we'd have an extraordinarily unrealistic perception of what the world is like for most people. We'd be less empathetic, less prepared and more narrow-minded.

Failure is what makes us human.

It's important to embrace change.

The only constant in life is change. You can either go with the flow, or swim against the current.

We often find what we are truly gifted at by failing at what we initially desire. It's true that we might feel defeated for a time, but if we accept that life is a series of constant changes, we'll learn that it's only temporary.

Think about failure like accidentally making a wrong turn on the way home and taking the scenic route. Yes, it's more time-consuming, and somewhat enraging at first. Yet, in the process, we also get an exceptionally beautiful view.

Simply put, we all have to learn to take the good with the bad. We might believe that we are going to follow a distinct path in life, but nobody can predict the future.

As the philosopher Alan Watts once stated:

The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance.

Embrace the unexpected. Revel in the convoluted nature of existence.

Society necessitates diversity.

Everyone has a different path in life. We can't all be pop stars. As a society, we function because there are people who end up in an endless assortment of positions.

Accordingly, Martin Luther King, Jr. once stated:

Whatever your life's work is, do it well. A man should do his job so well that the living, the dead, and the unborn could do it no better.

In essence, take pride in your profession, regardless of where you end up. The worth of an individual cannot be equated with his or her career. Ultimately, our true value is a product of the way in which we interact with others.

Not everyone will achieve wealth and fame, but this should not be how a person measures success.

Success is achieved by having a positive impact on the world around you, even in a minute way. A tiny stone can create big ripples when thrown into water.

No one should live a predetermined life.

Life is not meant to be set out and determined from the very beginning. Humanity's darkest moments have been a product of this mentality.

When we seek to control, it produces an oppressive environment. It's possible to do this on a personal level as well.

Don't constrain yourself with a prescribed lifestyle. Enjoy all that this world has to offer. Explore, discover, take risks and step outside of your comfort zone.

Humanity was not meant to be placed inside of a box and shipped from birth to death.

Life is arbitrary and dynamic. When we plan too far ahead, we forget to enjoy the moment.

Disappointment makes success that much sweeter.

The great American poet, Robert Frost, once wrote:

In three words I can sum up everything I've learned about life: it goes on.

Indeed, regardless of our own feelings towards the world, it will continue on without us.

We will all face disappointments, it's a natural aspect of existence. Yet, there would be no victory without defeat.

Simultaneously, the world is not black and white, there are shades of grey. We aren't always sitting at one extreme or the other.

It's impossible to appreciate success without first understanding what it means to fail. Remaining cognizant of this takes patience and perseverance. The most accomplished people in history possessed both of these qualities.

This is not to say that you should give up on your dreams, but that it's important to understand that they will likely change as we grow.

Likewise, in the words of Winston Churchill:

Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.

We can never really know where we will end up in life. Your childhood dreams could end up becoming minuscule in comparison to what you ultimately accomplish.

Enjoy the ride, remain indefatigably determined and remember that the future is a product of our actions in the present. Carpe diem.

[jwillia1961]

Best-Teacher Awards Are Bunk

They distract us from colleges’ systemic failures.

By Jacques Berlinerblau AUGUST 21, 2017  Chronicle of Higher Education PREMIUM

Each year, the journal The Literary Review bestows the Bad Sex in Fiction Award upon an author who produces coital-themed prose of exceptionally poor quality. I’d like to rejigger the prize for the professoriate and honor the Most Unrealistic Depiction of a College Class in American Cinema. My nomination, hands down, goes to the 2003 film Mona Lisa Smile, starring Julia Roberts. The actress plays Professor Katherine Ann Watson, an art-history instructor teaching on a one-year contract at Wellesley College in 1953.

There is so much askew in Mona Lisa Smile’s classroom scenes that I don’t even know where to start. How do we account for students who have memorized the entire textbook by the first day of class? How could a bunch of 20-year-olds know enough about scholarly mores to throw shade at Ms. Watson for not yet having her doctorate? I’m also confused as to why, by semester’s end, each student presents the professor with a well-executed painting of flowers. I mean, I get the allusion to their burgeoning, agentive, feminist consciousness and all. But when did "History of Art 100" become a studio class?

Not everyone at Wellesley offers heartfelt gifts to the freewheelin’ Professor Watson. The administration renews her contract only on the condition that she tone down all the liberal stuff in her lectures (and personal life). Professor Watson refuses to compromise her integrity. Upon her bittersweet departure, crestfallen students escort her taxi past the campus gate on their bicycles. As they complete their rolling salute to pedagogical greatness, they tear up over the loss of an Instructor Who Makes Us Think. And Love.

The question for me is not why a Hollywood depiction of college life is so off the mark. We humanists — who’d struggle to properly position and align our pipe cleaners in a shoebox diorama — ought not cast aspersions on the artists who produced a movie as pretty as Mona Lisa Smile. No, the question for me is why narratives about great teachers abound in hype and sentimentality.

Students have a lot going on in their lives -- and not much of it has to do with us.

This tendency is certainly not restricted to cinema. Even serious academic studies of pedagogy traffic in this sort of hyperbole. I think of Ken Bain’s 2004 book, What the Best College Teachers Do (Harvard University Press). This thorough and well-intentioned study set out "to capture the collective scholarship of some of the best teachers in the United States, to record not just what they do but also how they think, and most of all, to begin to conceptualize their practices."

Bain admirably deploys multiple metrics to identify his best teachers. His research abides by rules of rigorous scholarly inquiry. Yet even this trained academic can’t avoid excessive praise. "How does Ann Woodworth, a professor of theater at Northwestern University," he asks, "lift her acting students to heights of thespian brilliance?"

The Harvard professor Michael Sandel, teaching a class of 700 students (!), is commended extensively. According to Bain, Sandel helps undergraduates become "good political philosophers" by asking them to imagine "fundamental issues of justice and understand their own thinking." Bain is equally unconcerned about massified classes when he lauds another best teacher for asking pre-class questions of his 200 registered students.

Although Bain concedes that even the best instructors have bad days, his analysis loses sight of that truth. The educators he writes about appear to consistently elicit epiphanies in their young charges. The scholars are rarely shown to stumble during lectures. They never arrive late for class or lose their tempers with insolent seniors. Grade disputes, a fact of life for any college teacher doing his or her own marking, are nonexistent. The students themselves play but a supporting role in Bain’s analysis. They exist as fans. An audience. Reaction shots.

This sentimentalization of Best College Teachers strikes me as misguided and even a bit sinister. It fails to take into consideration how undergraduates today typically interact with their professors — just as it turns our attention away from those obvious structural factors that make it so hard for scholars to actually focus on their students.

Abook that helps us pump the brakes on over-the-top depictions of inspired college teaching is the 2005 My Freshman Year: What a Professor Learned by Becoming a Student (Cornell University Press). This eye-opening study was published by an anthropologist, Cathy A. Small, a professor at Northern Arizona University, writing under the pen name Rebekah Nathan. For any scholar, the premise of My Freshman Year is the stuff of night terrors. The author, a tenured ethnographer, matriculates (undercover) at the age of 52 as a student in the college at which she teaches. She even takes up residence in the dorms. This feat of derring-do reminds us that anthropologists are the professoriate’s last remaining daredevils, stuntpersons who will launch themselves off a 13,000-foot cliff in a wingsuit in quest of knowledge(s).

Small provides a sobering counterpoint to the treacly narrative of inspirational college teachers. "Most professors and administrators," she writes, "overestimate the role that academics plays in student culture, and as a result they magnify the impact of teachers and classes on student life and decisions." One reason undergraduates are impervious to our influence is that they’re incredibly busy. They are cross-pressured by jobs, club activities, internships, romance, social obligations, and other classes. Put simply, students have a lot going on in their lives — and not much of it has to do with us.

A recent analysis obliquely buttresses this point. It argues that college students spend significantly less time studying than do high-school students (10.9 fewer hours per week). They show roughly equal commitment to educational and work-related activities. If we look at 50-year trends, full-time students are spending less and less of their day preparing for class.

Reflecting on her own discoveries in the field, Small raises a concern that speaks to the reality of contemporary scholar/undergraduate relations. "As an anthropologist," she laments, "I was humbled to see how little I, as a professor, knew of my students’ academic world." I think the converse of Small’s observation is equally true: Students have no idea who we are. They have no clear sense of how or why we became professors. They know little of what our job entails outside of the sessions we spend with them. They couldn’t distinguish a provost from a postdoc.

Prizes draw attention away from the fact that educating an undergraduate is a collective, not an individual, enterprise.

The bitter and undeniable truth is that most professors and students in 21st-century America are cordially estranged. The two groups lead parallel lives on campus, their only point of intersection being the occasional classroom spaces they happen to inhabit concurrently. As far as a professor is concerned, the students arrayed in front of him or her could just as well be a flash mob that assembles twice a week and takes notes as part of its performance. Professors and students do not necessarily think ill of each other. The truth is that they hardly think of each other at all.

The developments that resulted in this cordial estrangement are complex, and I certainly can’t expound upon them here. My best guess is that things started shifting in the 1980s. Maybe it was the increased emphasis on research that drove scholars away from the more avuncular relations they may have maintained with students in earlier generations. Maybe housing prices rose and it became more difficult for professors to purchase properties near campus. Maybe the spread of contingency made it hard for underpaid and undervalued academics to concentrate on mentoring. Maybe it was the expansion of the administrative class that inserted itself as a firewall between professors and students. Maybe economic trends forced more kids out of their study carrels and into low-paying jobs. Or maybe a growing awareness of sexual harassment in the 1980s had the positive effect of neutralizing campus predators, and the negative one of giving nonpredatory professors reason to distance themselves from undergrads — all the better to focus on research!

No matter what the reasons, the consequences are dismal. What has been lost, in both theory and practice, is the idea of meaningful and sustained relations between faculty members and those they teach. The student-professor encounter has become increasingly transactional. Office hours are perfunctory; students who do attend come only to discuss finals or to offer excuses for late papers. Mentoring has become a lost art, like the mid-range jump shot or album-cover design. That some schools advertise their "experiential learning" or "student-professor research initiatives" as perks and selling points indicates how rare these types of interactions have become.

Finding exemplary instructors in this context is at once hard and easy. Hard because we care so little about training and cultivating skilled teachers. Easy because the field is not exceedingly competitive; few scholars are actually vying for this honor.

Can I be perfectly frank with you? The whole discourse of Best College Teachers strikes me as bunk. Whether it’s Baylor University’s Robert Foster Cherry Award for Great Teaching (with a cash prize of $250,000), or those "Faculty of the Year" honors that are dispensed at every college according to a body of work that is, literally, inscrutable — it all seems off to me. I don’t doubt that there are some truly phenomenal instructors out there who have deserved these accolades (just as I don’t doubt that some duds have received them as well). Yet this system of tribute undermines a lot of what we aim for as educators.

Let me first say a word about inscrutability. How does any professor, let alone a panel of judges, really know what goes on in another professor’s class? Longstanding academic convention dictates that we rarely cross the threshold of a colleague’s classroom. We are seldom invited to one another’s lectures and seminars. It goes without saying that an unannounced "pop in" is strictly out of the question.

The door to a lecture hall could just as well be a police sawhorse — if that sawhorse stood behind a moat and was outfitted with a gun turret. Herein lies an unrecognized truth about American higher education: The inner workings of college teaching spaces are more or less unknown. Outside of that 60-minute theatrical set piece known as a "peer observation," and the metric anarchy of a SET, or "student evaluation of teaching," how does any nonregistered citizen know anything about what transpires in any college class? What goes on in there? Line dancing? Capoeira? Face painting? With the exception of a matriculated undergrad, nobody is in a good position to witness the commitment, or excellence, or inspiration of a college teacher.

Then again, even if we possessed high-def video of every college lecture ever given since the foundation of the University of Heidelberg, how would we achieve any consensus about what constitutes teaching excellence? Ronald Berk, in his inimitable Thirteen Strategies to Measure College Teaching (Stylus, 2006), identified, yes, 13 rather distinct instruments currently used to draw conclusions about a professor’s effectiveness. What I find fascinating about the tools that Berk elucidates for us is how so many of these indices are likely to yield radically different conclusions about who excels. One measurement is based on a professor’s self-assessment of his/her work in a class. One relies on student evaluations. Still others turn to external evaluators. Those could be very different from a metric that looks at, say, how much students learn across a semester or perhaps through the length of their college stay.

Which brings us to another problem with Best Teacher rhetoric: These types of prizes draw attention away from the fact that educating an undergraduate is a collective, not an individual, enterprise. The type of knowledge we impart in college is sequential. It is pointless to take a specialized course on "The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu" before you’ve taken "Introduction to Sociology," "Social Theory," "Stratification," and maybe "Cultural Sociology." The concept of an academic major implies the existence of a reasonably well-ordered curriculum. One great teacher cannot teach an entire curriculum. That takes a team.

I once had a colleague who taught a 200-level class. She loathed the fellow who taught the 100-level that was a prerequisite for her own. The latter was a campus legend. He was a flamboyant character who gyrated and twerked as he lectured. By the time his students cycled into her class, they knew exceedingly little about the subject matter. Her 200 regressed into a 100, because the guy in the 100 was teaching — well, she had no idea what he was teaching. He did win many Faculty of the Year awards, though.

The team metaphor reminds me of another thing that irks me about Best Teacher banter. Individuals on teams have different skills and strengths. Yet conversations about great instructors never seem to recognize that professors are better at some things than others. It’s as if great college teachers are always exemplary on all levels. You just rush them into any auditorium on a palanquin, press the start button, and they’ll start dishing wisdom around the class like an NBA point guard.

I sincerely doubt this is the case. Not all schools, classes, and learning contexts are the same. I don’t know if a popular professor at Yale would necessarily be a hit at quirky Marlboro College, in Vermont, or vice versa. I am a capable undergraduate teacher, but graduate students don’t dig the cut of my jib. Some professors have a knack for working with freshmen. Some don’t. This is actually a really important thing for a college to know about its faculty, because first-year students are at higher risk for adversity, like depression and dropping out.

Best Teacher awards ask us to gawk at those who somehow overcame immense, and correctable, structural obstacles.

If we thought seriously about teaching, we’d pay more attention to putting scholars in positions where they excel. We’d assess who was good at what. We’d know who works well with at-risk students or kids with learning disabilities, and we’d staff our departments accordingly. We are, I regret to say, a million, billion eons away from even starting a conversation of this nature.

But the most insidious thing about Best Teacher talk is that it conveniently distracts us from what truly ails American higher education: We have a lot of scholars who are too poorly prepared, poorly motivated, and/or poorly paid to properly educate undergraduates. This is a structural problem. Graduate schools fail to provide the necessary training in pedagogy. Administrations subject tenure-line faculty members to promotion criteria that render undergraduates an afterthought. Exploited, overworked contingent professors are forced to teach ginormous classes.

The likelihood of great college teaching actually happening on your campus is infinitely lower than the likelihood of great research being produced. This has much to do with the fact that administrations won’t make the financial investments required to facilitate good teaching. A report by Steven Shulman, of Colorado State University’s Center for the Study of Academic Labor, echoes those sentiments, arguing that universities "do not seem to care about anything other than driving faculty costs to the lowest possible level."

Seen in this light, Best Teacher chatter assumes a more sinister countenance. It asks us to gawk at those who somehow overcame immense, and correctable, structural obstacles. It turns our attention away from the manner in which contingent instructors are treated. A Faculty of the Year award is a laurel wreath that a college places on its own flaxen hair. Christening a Best Teacher is like a lily-white company congratulating itself on its diversity after hiring one African-American executive VP. It’s like a catastrophe-inducing oil conglomerate releasing an ad about how it installed a dozen wind turbines in the name of sustainability.

Tributes to Best College Teachers do to professors what high fashion does to women — enslaves them to preposterous and unhealthy expectations of what constitutes the beautiful in pedagogy. I still don’t have an answer as to why conversations about best teachers trigger exaggeration and confetti drops. That sort of hyperbole, in any case, is inimical to the type of balanced analysis that educators value and impart. I, for my part, could just as well do away with the entire vainglorious discourse. Less noise about best teachers might let us finally concentrate on the challenge of producing lots of good ones.

But let me be clear about something: On every campus in America, you will find good teachers. These are contingent or tenure-line professors who are skilled, inspired, and committed educators. What is my metric for gauging their quality? First and foremost, I look for scholars who actually want to be in a classroom with undergraduates. That noble impulse is mercilessly assailed, and usually ruthlessly expunged, after a decade of graduate school. I’m always intrigued by a scholar who could endure that experience — which does everything it can to assassinate one’s passion to educate — and emerge with their love of pedagogy intact.

Good teaching, however, is not like religion; it takes more than faith. Solid instructors are individuals who (somehow) develop real pedagogical skills. And I’m talking about banal stuff: crafting a smart, challenging, ideologically balanced syllabus; sticking to that syllabus; always being on time (a perennial challenge); pacing a class session properly; developing that weird teacherly inner siren that starts blaring when your students (1) have no idea what you’re talking about and/or (2) have not really done the reading.

The teachers I admire render really complex ideas with clarity — that right there is the heavy lift of college instruction. They find pedagogically sound ways to piss off their students. And one other thing: They inspire thoughtfulness. They actually manage to get otherwise distracted 18- to 24-year-olds to think about matters they’d never have thought about otherwise. Good teachers aggressively infiltrate young minds. The trespass extends for years, and not necessarily in ways that those infiltrated minds find pleasant. That’s my preferred "learning outcome."

I’m sure I could conjure up a dozen other attributes, but then I’d end up mimicking the florid cadences of the folks I am criticizing. So let me just add that good college teachers endure semesters in which everything inexplicably and catastrophically goes wrong. Having stuff go up in flames — all good college teachers experience, and even solicit, conflagration.

In any case, for now I’ll repeat that scholars such as the ones I am describing may be in the minority, but they really do exist. They exist in spite of the absurdities of the tenure system. They exist in spite of the collapsed job market. They exist in spite of thoughtless and frugal college administrations. These people share one psychosocial characteristic: They exist in a tensile relationship with their own profession. They do not share the priorities of their research-obsessed colleagues and managers. Good college teachers, then, don’t necessarily do what is in their own professional interest. They do what’s in the interest of their students. That, at least, is something Mona Lisa Smile intuited accurately.

Jacques Berlinerblau directs the Center for Jewish Civilization at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service. This essay is adapted from his new book, Campus Confidential: How College Works, or Doesn’t, for Professors, Parents, and Students (Melville House).