#stucco repair contractor in Minnesota

[anicettestuccorepair]

How Stucco Repair Contractors Prepare A Work Area?

When considering stucco repairs, visions of patching cracks and applying stucco may come to mind. However, a crucial, often overlooked step precedes the repairs themselves: the work area preparation. This meticulous process by your stucco repair contractor in Minnesota ensures a safe and efficient repair job. Here's a breakdown of how stucco repair contractors prepare your work area for a smooth repair experience.

Safety First: Establishing Boundaries and Protection

Safety is paramount for both the stucco repair contractor and your property. The first step involves setting up a set work area. It includes:

Perimeter Barriers: Signage and caution tape cordon off the work area. It prevents accidental entry by residents, pets, or passersby. This step is essential when working on higher levels.

Ground Protection: Drop cloths or tarps are laid down around the base of the wall being repaired. They catch debris, dust, and stucco material. It protects walkways, landscaping, patios, decks, and other exteriors.

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): A stucco repair contractor will wear gloves, safety glasses, respirators, and hard hats. They will use these safety gear for complex projects.

Securing the Work Area and Access Points:

Depending on the location of the damage, the stucco repair contractor may need to secure specific access points:

Door and Window Protection: Doors and windows near the work area are often covered with heavy-duty plastic sheeting secured with tape. It prevents dust and debris from migrating inside the house.

Scaffolding Assembly (if necessary): Sturdy scaffolding may be needed for repairs on high walls. The stucco repair contractor will ensure proper assembly and inspection of the scaffolding to provide a safe working platform.

Detailed Evaluation and Documentation:

Before scraping or demolition begins, the expert thoroughly evaluates the damaged area. It includes:

Damage Assessment: The contractor will calculate the size of the damage and identify the type of cracks or spalling. Then, they will evaluate the overall condition of the surrounding stucco.

Documentation: Photos and detailed notes are often taken to document the damage. They also serve as a reference point for the repair process and final results.

Clearing the Work Area and Removing Obstructions:

To ensure efficient workflow and full access to the damaged area, the stucco repair contractor will:

Furniture Removal: Any furniture, planters, or decorative elements near the work area are carefully removed and stored in a safe location to avoid damage from falling debris.

Disconnecting Utilities (if necessary): In rare cases, the contractor may need to disconnect electrical lines or outdoor spigots temporarily. However, it all depends on the location and extent of the damage.

Surface Preparation: Cleaning and Prepping the Stucco:

The stucco repair contractor  will meticulously clean and prepare the surface for repairs:

High-Pressure Cleaning (optional): Sometimes, the contractor may use a low-pressure washer to remove dirt, grime, and loose particles from the stucco surface.

Manual Cleaning: Areas around the damaged section are thoroughly cleaned with brushes and water to remove loose debris and ensure proper adhesion of the repair materials.

Crack Widening (for larger cracks): For cracks wider than ¼ inch, the contractor may use a masonry crack chisel. It slightly widens the crack to create a better key for the patching material.

The Importance of Meticulous Preparation:

This seemingly mundane work area preparation plays a vital role in the overall success of the stucco repair. It ensures:

Safety: Proper barriers and PPE safeguard workers and your property.

Efficiency: A cleared and well-organized work area streamlines the repair process.

Quality Repairs: Clean and prepped surfaces ensure optimal adhesion and long-lasting repair.

Minimal Disruption: Cautious planning and protection minimize inconvenience for homeowners.

By witnessing the meticulous work area preparation, you gain valuable insight into the professionalism and attention to detail your stucco repair contractor in Minnesota brings to the project. A comprehensive approach from the experts of Anicette Stucco ensures your stucco repairs are aesthetically attractive, structurally sound, and built to last.

[tschaubpainti-blog]

T Schaub Painting LLC

Phone: 651 270 1742

Address: 3312 34th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55406

At T Schaub Painting, we have provided the highest quality painting services in the Minneapolis area in Minnesota for over 10 years. When your ordinary home is not enough, our painting contractor has the skilled hands to make your typical walls grand. Painting seems like a relatively easy task, but there are actually several factors that can make it complicated. For one thing, you have to be familiar with the color theory. Having knowledge of what colors match will help prevent you from getting results that clash. Before getting your outdoor walls painted, you may also need a pressure washing service to ensure that the paint will go on evenly. This is especially true for exterior painting projects. Cleaning the dirt and grime off of your exterior walls may need special equipment. Different interior wall surfaces also call for different techniques. These are just some of the reasons why it may be in your best interest to hire the services of a professional painter. We guarantee you excellent craftsmanship. When it comes to your commercial or home’s exterior coatings, it’s all in the details. We specialize in home painting, stucco, drywall repair, and being a painting company that creates excellent exteriors and gorgeous interiors. We provide quality work to ensure that our clients are satisfied. If you’re looking for a reliable painting company in Minneapolis, Tim Schaub Painting company is at your service. Give us a call today!

[llorrainehoffman]

Proliferating Home Inspection Tests

Cost-Benefit Criterion

It’s not just medicine where there are now more — and more expensive — diagnostic tests.

Home inspections increasingly include multiple, specialized tests as well.

Besides the standard, whole home inspection for around $400, these three tests seem to be popping up more regularly in today’s housing market:

One.  Radon.  An odorless gas released by soil decomposition, radon represents a health threat at elevated levels.  In Minnesota, the threshold for remediation is 4.0 PicoLiters per million parts.  Cost:  about $175.  Remediation (if needed):  $1,200 to $1,400.

See also, “Testing for Radon 2013“; “Testing for Radon:  Cost-Benefit Analysis;” “Recommending a Radon Test (or Not).”

Two. Furnace or boiler.  When the Buyer’s home inspector suspects an issue with the heat exchanger or other components, the usual next step is to bring in a licensed HVAC contractor to certify that the unit is operating safely.   Cost:  $200.  Replacement:  $3,500 to $5,000.

Three. Sewer optical inspection.  Basically, a “colonoscopy” for the home’s connection to the main sewer.  The contractor literally runs a camera through the sewer, looking for cracks.  Cost:  $200.  Repair:  $5,000 to $10,000 in the city — more in rural areas where the main sewer connection is further from the home.  See, “What’s That Depression in the Yard?”

Situation-Specific

In addition to the above, there are additional tests that are home-specific.

So, many Buyers of stucco homes built in the last 20 years elect to test the home’s wall cavities for elevated moisture levels.

The usual concern is that the home’s vapor barrier has been installed incorrectly, capturing moisture in the home’s wall cavities where it incubates mold and slowly rots the home’s (wood) frame.

Cost to repair/remediate?

A LOT — not the least of which is for attorney’s fees incurred in the inevitable litigation.

Finally, when the home’s chimney or flue shows deterioration, running a camera through it can verify the existence and scope of the problem(s).

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In each case, the rationale for recommending a test (or not) should be a simple cost-benefit criterion.

That is, does the risk of finding (and correcting) a problem exceed the cost of the test?

Radon tests — to pick just one example — easily pass that test.

So, if the odds of finding elevated radon range from one-third to one-half (my clients’ experience), and remediation costs $1,400, the “benefit” is about $600.

That far exceeds the usual $175 cost.

One other consideration:  unlike medical tests, which can pose their own health risks (like radiation), testing a home (usually) has no adverse side effects.

P.S.:  Even though lead-based paint is presumably in every home built before 1978 (when it was discontinued), I’ve never seen a homeowner test to verify that.

Instead, the standard way of disclosing that fact to prospective Buyers is to tell them that, to the best of the homeowner’s knowledge, the home does not have lead-based paint in it.

from RSSMix.com Mix ID 8230558 http://ift.tt/2q0NiCe via IFTTT

[dirakisabelle]

Proliferating Home Inspection Tests

Cost-Benefit Criterion

It’s not just medicine where there are now more — and more expensive — diagnostic tests.

Home inspections increasingly include multiple, specialized tests as well.

Besides the standard, whole home inspection for around $400, these three tests seem to be popping up more regularly in today’s housing market:

One.  Radon.  An odorless gas released by soil decomposition, radon represents a health threat at elevated levels.  In Minnesota, the threshold for remediation is 4.0 PicoLiters per million parts.  Cost:  about $175.  Remediation (if needed):  $1,200 to $1,400.

See also, “Testing for Radon 2013“; “Testing for Radon:  Cost-Benefit Analysis;” “Recommending a Radon Test (or Not).”

Two. Furnace or boiler.  When the Buyer’s home inspector suspects an issue with the heat exchanger or other components, the usual next step is to bring in a licensed HVAC contractor to certify that the unit is operating safely.   Cost:  $200.  Replacement:  $3,500 to $5,000.

Three. Sewer optical inspection.  Basically, a “colonoscopy” for the home’s connection to the main sewer.  The contractor literally runs a camera through the sewer, looking for cracks.  Cost:  $200.  Repair:  $5,000 to $10,000 in the city — more in rural areas where the main sewer connection is further from the home.  See, “What’s That Depression in the Yard?”

Situation-Specific

In addition to the above, there are additional tests that are home-specific.

So, many Buyers of stucco homes built in the last 20 years elect to test the home’s wall cavities for elevated moisture levels.

The usual concern is that the home’s vapor barrier has been installed incorrectly, capturing moisture in the home’s wall cavities where it incubates mold and slowly rots the home’s (wood) frame.

Cost to repair/remediate?

A LOT — not the least of which is for attorney’s fees incurred in the inevitable litigation.

Finally, when the home’s chimney or flue shows deterioration, running a camera through it can verify the existence and scope of the problem(s).

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In each case, the rationale for recommending a test (or not) should be a simple cost-benefit criterion.

That is, does the risk of finding (and correcting) a problem exceed the cost of the test?

Radon tests — to pick just one example — easily pass that test.

So, if the odds of finding elevated radon range from one-third to one-half (my clients’ experience), and remediation costs $1,400, the “benefit” is about $600.

That far exceeds the usual $175 cost.

One other consideration:  unlike medical tests, which can pose their own health risks (like radiation), testing a home (usually) has no adverse side effects.

P.S.:  Even though lead-based paint is presumably in every home built before 1978 (when it was discontinued), I’ve never seen a homeowner test to verify that.

Instead, the standard way of disclosing that fact to prospective Buyers is to tell them that, to the best of the homeowner’s knowledge, the home does not have lead-based paint in it.

from RSSMix.com Mix ID 8230535 http://ift.tt/2q0NiCe via IFTTT

[cristobalcarpenterblog]

Proliferating Home Inspection Tests

Cost-Benefit Criterion

It’s not just medicine where there are now more — and more expensive — diagnostic tests.

Home inspections increasingly include multiple, specialized tests as well.

Besides the standard, whole home inspection for around $400, these three tests seem to be popping up more regularly in today’s housing market:

One.  Radon.  An odorless gas released by soil decomposition, radon represents a health threat at elevated levels.  In Minnesota, the threshold for remediation is 4.0 PicoLiters per million parts.  Cost:  about $175.  Remediation (if needed):  $1,200 to $1,400.

See also, “Testing for Radon 2013“; “Testing for Radon:  Cost-Benefit Analysis;” “Recommending a Radon Test (or Not).”

Two. Furnace or boiler.  When the Buyer’s home inspector suspects an issue with the heat exchanger or other components, the usual next step is to bring in a licensed HVAC contractor to certify that the unit is operating safely.   Cost:  $200.  Replacement:  $3,500 to $5,000.

Three. Sewer optical inspection.  Basically, a “colonoscopy” for the home’s connection to the main sewer.  The contractor literally runs a camera through the sewer, looking for cracks.  Cost:  $200.  Repair:  $5,000 to $10,000 in the city — more in rural areas where the main sewer connection is further from the home.  See, “What’s That Depression in the Yard?”

Situation-Specific

In addition to the above, there are additional tests that are home-specific.

So, many Buyers of stucco homes built in the last 20 years elect to test the home’s wall cavities for elevated moisture levels.

The usual concern is that the home’s vapor barrier has been installed incorrectly, capturing moisture in the home’s wall cavities where it incubates mold and slowly rots the home’s (wood) frame.

Cost to repair/remediate?

A LOT — not the least of which is for attorney’s fees incurred in the inevitable litigation.

Finally, when the home’s chimney or flue shows deterioration, running a camera through it can verify the existence and scope of the problem(s).

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In each case, the rationale for recommending a test (or not) should be a simple cost-benefit criterion.

That is, does the risk of finding (and correcting) a problem exceed the cost of the test?

Radon tests — to pick just one example — easily pass that test.

So, if the odds of finding elevated radon range from one-third to one-half (my clients’ experience), and remediation costs $1,400, the “benefit” is about $600.

That far exceeds the usual $175 cost.

One other consideration:  unlike medical tests, which can pose their own health risks (like radiation), testing a home (usually) has no adverse side effects.

P.S.:  Even though lead-based paint is presumably in every home built before 1978 (when it was discontinued), I’ve never seen a homeowner test to verify that.

Instead, the standard way of disclosing that fact to prospective Buyers is to tell them that, to the best of the homeowner’s knowledge, the home does not have lead-based paint in it.

from RSSMix.com Mix ID 8230115 http://ift.tt/2q0NiCe via IFTTT