#standard 'this does not preclude other forms of activism' disclaimer

[sniperct]

"I live in a red state my vote doesn't ma-"

If your vote didn't matter they wouldn't try so hard to make it harder to vote in red states. Voting in red states can turn them into swing states like Georgia, Ohio, and Arizona. And voting in blue states can keep them from becoming swing states.

California used to be Red. Texas was Blue long ago. Florida was once a swing state. Obama took Indiana but it's gone redder since. Ten years ago Arizona and Georgia going blue was unthinkable.

Things change and we can make them change.

And that's before getting into more local elections. Turning cities blue, the state legislature.

Red states have flipped blue in recent years at those levels too.

Because people vote, and if we vote in high enough numbers we can turn a tight election into a walk in the park. If we vote in high enough numbers, we can turn a loss into a win. So many good things have happened in states where someone won by like 100 votes. (arizona is one)

[click2watch]

Wallet Provider Blockchain Sues Crypto Startup Days Before ICO

Luxembourg-based cryptocurrency wallet provider Blockchain has filed a lawsuit against a startup with a similar name, the company announced Thursday.

Blockchain – formerly known as Blockchain.info – is suing Blockchain.io just days in advance of the latter’s initial coin offering (ICO) over concerns that investors may believe they are buying tokens distributed by the wallet distributor, according to a public court filing.

Specifically, the suit names Paymium SAS, the company behind Blockchain.io, and founder Pierre Noizat, as defendants, claiming that Paymium has participated in “bad acts,” including the operation of the now-defunct crypto wallet Instawallet.

A representative for Blockchain told CoinDesk that the move came as a result of investors confusing the two firms, adding:

“As we allege in our complaint, blockchain.io is using our brand to cover up a history of hacking and theft of user funds. Worse, they are raising money in a dubious ICO they claim is ‘registered with the [U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission].’ There is of course no registration statement in place. Given the current climate of SEC enforcement and scam ICOs, when users and investors alerted us to this confusion, we needed to step up and take action before any further harm was done.”

  Among the suit’s arguments is the claim that Blockchain.io’s logo is similar to Blockchain’s, which infringes its design marks (both logos are pictured above).

The complaint specifically states that “Blockchain does not claim exclusive rights to the word ‘blockchain’ to describe the technology underlying cryptocurrencies …Rather, it claims exclusive rights in the BLOCKCHAIN marks, which it has been using exclusively for its Blockchain Products and which have become well and favorably known to consumers throughout the United States and the world as identifying its highly regarded and secure services.”

It goes on to note that “in 2018, after years of doing business under different trademarks, Paymium adopted the mark BLOCKCHAIN.IO in a blatant and bad faith attempt to capitalize on the valuable and trusted BLOCKCHAIN marks and to confuse consumers into believing Paymium’s inferior services emanate from or are otherwise associated with Blockchain.”

“Paymium’s digital currency services are identical or nearly identical to Blockchain’s Digital Wallet Services, Mobile App Services and Website Services, which allow consumers to exchange one form of digital currency for another, such as bitcoin for ether or bitcoin cash,” the suit continued.

However, Blockchain.io has denied the claim, with founder Pierre Noizat telling CoinDesk that “we find it strange that Blockchain Luxembourg filed a claim just [six] days before our public token sale when they had [six] years to contact us regarding our domain name if they had issues with it.”

Indeed, whois information confirms that the domain “blockchain.io” was first registered in April 2012 by Paymium. Public records with the National Institute of Industrial Property, the French patent office, also show that blockchain.io was registered as a brand in 2017.

However, it is unclear if there was any activity under the domain prior to 2018. The Wayback Machine does have a snapshot from 2017, indicating the domain may have simply redirected to Paymium’s website at the time.

And while ICOs cannot “register with the SEC,” companies offering securities sales can declare their intent to do so. Public records indicate that Paymium filed a “Form D” for the sale of “digital tokens” in June 2018, announcing the company’s intent to sell tokens in the future.

CoinDesk was unable to confirm that Blockchain.io had registered with the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution, or the French bank and insurance company monitor, as the firm claimed in its pitch deck.

Lawyers weigh in

The lawsuit has failed to impress at least some lawyers who work in the space.

Stephen Palley, an attorney with corporate law firm Anderson Kill P.C., told CoinDesk that “it’s an odd argument to make in a trademark infringement action.”

His colleague, Dan Healy, explained further, saying that “BLOCKCHAIN” is a generic term.

“Generic terms are not generally trademarks because they do not identify [a] source. They generically refer to a thing or service. It looks like the plaintiff is trying to show that it is using its design mark as a source identifier for digital wallet services, as something not generic to blockchain, even though they are wallets for holding blockchain currency,” he explained.

Palley expanded on that idea, noting that “in fact, they had to disclaim any such protection, the lawsuit even says as much.”

He added:

“Their use of the word blockchain isn’t really protected under U.S. Trademark law … Perhaps because they couldn’t get protection for the word, they filed a “design mark” – “blockchain” in all capital letters with a picture next to it. And even though they don’t have trademark protection for the word, it appears that they are in effect by this lawsuit trying to use their design mark to prevent blockchain.io from using the word blockchain.”

“We think that’s a weak argument,” he concluded.

Healy noted that Blockchain disclaimed the term, saying “no claim is made to the exclusive right to use BLOCKCHAIN apart from the mark as shown.”

“That means the plaintiff has a design mark and disclaimed the exclusive right to use the term BLOCKCHAIN, but appears to be trying to enforce its mark to preclude other from using the term BLOCKCHAIN,” he said.

Scales image via Shutterstock

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','//connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');

fbq('init', '472218139648482'); fbq('init', '239547076708948'); fbq('track', "PageView"); This news post is collected from CoinDesk

Recommended Read

Editor choice

BinBot Pro – Safest & Highly Recommended Binary Options Auto Trading Robot

Do you live in a country like USA or Canada where using automated trading systems is a problem? If you do then now we ...

9.5

Demo & Pro Version Try It Now

Read full review

The post Wallet Provider Blockchain Sues Crypto Startup Days Before ICO appeared first on Click 2 Watch.

More Details Here → https://click2.watch/wallet-provider-blockchain-sues-crypto-startup-days-before-ico-2

[click2watch]

Wallet Provider Blockchain Sues Crypto Startup Days Before ICO

Luxembourg-based cryptocurrency wallet provider Blockchain has filed a lawsuit against a startup with a similar name, the company announced Thursday.

Blockchain – formerly known as Blockchain.info – is suing Blockchain.io just days in advance of the latter’s initial coin offering (ICO) over concerns that investors may believe they are buying tokens distributed by the wallet distributor, according to a public court filing.

Specifically, the suit names Paymium SAS, the company behind Blockchain.io, and founder Pierre Noizat, as defendants, claiming that Paymium has participated in “bad acts,” including the operation of the now-defunct crypto wallet Instawallet.

A representative for Blockchain told CoinDesk that the move came as a result of investors confusing the two firms, adding:

“As we allege in our complaint, blockchain.io is using our brand to cover up a history of hacking and theft of user funds. Worse, they are raising money in a dubious ICO they claim is ‘registered with the [U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission].’ There is of course no registration statement in place. Given the current climate of SEC enforcement and scam ICOs, when users and investors alerted us to this confusion, we needed to step up and take action before any further harm was done.”

  Among the suit’s arguments is the claim that Blockchain.io’s logo is similar to Blockchain’s, which infringes its design marks (both logos are pictured above).

The complaint specifically states that “Blockchain does not claim exclusive rights to the word ‘blockchain’ to describe the technology underlying cryptocurrencies …Rather, it claims exclusive rights in the BLOCKCHAIN marks, which it has been using exclusively for its Blockchain Products and which have become well and favorably known to consumers throughout the United States and the world as identifying its highly regarded and secure services.”

It goes on to note that “in 2018, after years of doing business under different trademarks, Paymium adopted the mark BLOCKCHAIN.IO in a blatant and bad faith attempt to capitalize on the valuable and trusted BLOCKCHAIN marks and to confuse consumers into believing Paymium’s inferior services emanate from or are otherwise associated with Blockchain.”

“Paymium’s digital currency services are identical or nearly identical to Blockchain’s Digital Wallet Services, Mobile App Services and Website Services, which allow consumers to exchange one form of digital currency for another, such as bitcoin for ether or bitcoin cash,” the suit continued.

However, Blockchain.io has denied the claim, with founder Pierre Noizat telling CoinDesk that “we find it strange that Blockchain Luxembourg filed a claim just [six] days before our public token sale when they had [six] years to contact us regarding our domain name if they had issues with it.”

Indeed, whois information confirms that the domain “blockchain.io” was first registered in April 2012 by Paymium. Public records with the National Institute of Industrial Property, the French patent office, also show that blockchain.io was registered as a brand in 2017.

However, it is unclear if there was any activity under the domain prior to 2018. The Wayback Machine does have a snapshot from 2017, indicating the domain may have simply redirected to Paymium’s website at the time.

And while ICOs cannot “register with the SEC,” companies offering securities sales can declare their intent to do so. Public records indicate that Paymium filed a “Form D” for the sale of “digital tokens” in June 2018, announcing the company’s intent to sell tokens in the future.

CoinDesk was unable to confirm that Blockchain.io had registered with the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution, or the French bank and insurance company monitor, as the firm claimed in its pitch deck.

Lawyers weigh in

The lawsuit has failed to impress at least some lawyers who work in the space.

Stephen Palley, an attorney with corporate law firm Anderson Kill P.C., told CoinDesk that “it’s an odd argument to make in a trademark infringement action.”

His colleague, Dan Healy, explained further, saying that “BLOCKCHAIN” is a generic term.

“Generic terms are not generally trademarks because they do not identify [a] source. They generically refer to a thing or service. It looks like the plaintiff is trying to show that it is using its design mark as a source identifier for digital wallet services, as something not generic to blockchain, even though they are wallets for holding blockchain currency,” he explained.

Palley expanded on that idea, noting that “in fact, they had to disclaim any such protection, the lawsuit even says as much.”

He added:

“Their use of the word blockchain isn’t really protected under U.S. Trademark law … Perhaps because they couldn’t get protection for the word, they filed a “design mark” – “blockchain” in all capital letters with a picture next to it. And even though they don’t have trademark protection for the word, it appears that they are in effect by this lawsuit trying to use their design mark to prevent blockchain.io from using the word blockchain.”

“We think that’s a weak argument,” he concluded.

Healy noted that Blockchain disclaimed the term, saying “no claim is made to the exclusive right to use BLOCKCHAIN apart from the mark as shown.”

“That means the plaintiff has a design mark and disclaimed the exclusive right to use the term BLOCKCHAIN, but appears to be trying to enforce its mark to preclude other from using the term BLOCKCHAIN,” he said.

Scales image via Shutterstock

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','//connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');

fbq('init', '472218139648482'); fbq('init', '239547076708948'); fbq('track', "PageView"); This news post is collected from CoinDesk

Recommended Read

Editor choice

BinBot Pro – Safest & Highly Recommended Binary Options Auto Trading Robot

Do you live in a country like USA or Canada where using automated trading systems is a problem? If you do then now we ...

9.5

Demo & Pro Version Try It Now

Read full review

The post Wallet Provider Blockchain Sues Crypto Startup Days Before ICO appeared first on Click 2 Watch.

More Details Here → https://click2.watch/wallet-provider-blockchain-sues-crypto-startup-days-before-ico

[shego1142]

Wanna add that one of the only reasons Georgia went blue like we did is because Stacey Abrams worked her butt off to make sure that people could vote!

Especially people in Atlanta and the surrounding areas, where there are a lot of people of colour and disenfranchised people who were specifically being targeted by republicans in order to have their votes suppressed, by strict voter ID rules, targeted closings of polling places, and misinformation.

Stacey Abrams founded the Fair Fight organisation, which helps to make sure that anyone who might not be treated fairly at the polls (poor, disabled, queer, people of colour and other minority groups) are able to vote!!

In the past decade she & the organisation has made it so 800,000 people in Georgia alone were registered and able to vote.

800,000

Your vote matters.

Georgia turned blue because people’s votes mattered, 800,000 more people voted and the state turned blue, all because someone told them that it did matter and it was important.

And I hope beyond belief that we turn blue again this year, but people have to remember that we have to show up!

We have got to vote.

There are so many ways people try to take your vote away, why would you just waste it or throw it away?!

Vote often, vote always.

"I live in a red state my vote doesn't ma-"

If your vote didn't matter they wouldn't try so hard to make it harder to vote in red states. Voting in red states can turn them into swing states like Georgia, Ohio, and Arizona. And voting in blue states can keep them from becoming swing states.

California used to be Red. Texas was Blue long ago. Florida was once a swing state. Obama took Indiana but it's gone redder since. Ten years ago Arizona and Georgia going blue was unthinkable.

Things change and we can make them change.

And that's before getting into more local elections. Turning cities blue, the state legislature.

Red states have flipped blue in recent years at those levels too.

Because people vote, and if we vote in high enough numbers we can turn a tight election into a walk in the park. If we vote in high enough numbers, we can turn a loss into a win. So many good things have happened in states where someone won by like 100 votes. (arizona is one)

[actuallytodojewski]

Alabama: https://www.sos.alabama.gov/alabama-votes/voter/register-to-vote

Alaska: https://www.elections.alaska.gov/Core/voterregistration.php

Arizona: https://azsos.gov/elections/voters

Arkansas: https://www.sos.arkansas.gov/elections/voter-information/voter-registration-information

California: https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voter-registration

Colorado: https://www.sos.state.co.us/voter/pages/pub/olvr/findVoterReg.xhtml

Connecticut: https://portal.ct.gov/sots/election-services/voter-information/voter-registration-information

Delaware: https://elections.delaware.gov/voter/votereg.shtml

Florida: https://www.registertovoteflorida.gov/home

Georgia: https://mvp.sos.ga.gov/s/

Hawaii: https://elections.hawaii.gov/register-to-vote/registration/

Idaho: https://voteidaho.gov/voter-registration/

Illinois: https://www.elections.il.gov/votingandregistrationsystems/register.aspx

Indiana: https://indianavoters.in.gov/

Iowa: https://sos.iowa.gov/elections/voterinformation/voterregistration.html

Kansas: https://sos.ks.gov/elections/voter-registration.html

Kentucky: https://elect.ky.gov/registertovote/Pages/default.aspx

Louisiana: https://www.sos.la.gov/ElectionsAndVoting/Pages/OnlineVoterRegistration.aspx

Maine: https://registertovote.sos.maine.gov/Home

Maryland: https://elections.maryland.gov/voter_registration/index.html

Massachusetts: https://www.mass.gov/topics/voting

Michigan: https://mvic.sos.state.mi.us/

Minnesota: https://www.sos.state.mn.us/elections-voting/register-to-vote/

Mississippi: https://www.sos.ms.gov/elections-voting/voter-registration-information

Missouri: https://www.sos.mo.gov/elections/goVoteMissouri/register

Montana: https://votemt.gov/voter-registration/

Nebraska: https://www.nebraska.gov/apps-sos-voter-registration/

Nevada: https://registertovote.nv.gov/

New Hampshire: https://www.sos.nh.gov/elections/register-vote

New Jersey: https://nj.gov/state/elections/voter-registration.shtml

New Mexico: https://www.sos.nm.gov/voting-and-elections/voter-information-portal-nmvote-org/voter-registration-information/

New York: https://elections.ny.gov/register-vote

North Carolina: https://www.ncsbe.gov/registering/checking-your-registration

North Dakota: https://www.sos.nd.gov/elections/voter/voting-north-dakota

Ohio: https://www.ohiosos.gov/elections/voters/register/

Oklahoma: https://oklahoma.gov/elections/voter-registration/register-to-vote.html

Oregon: https://sos.oregon.gov/voting/Pages/registration.aspx?lang=en

Pennsylvania: https://www.pa.gov/en/agencies/vote/voter-registration.html

Rhode Island: https://vote.sos.ri.gov/

South Carolina: https://scvotes.gov/voters/register-to-vote/

South Dakota: https://sdsos.gov/elections-voting/voting/register-to-vote/default.aspx

Tennessee: https://sos.tn.gov/elections/guides/how-to-register-to-vote

Texas: https://www.texas.gov/living-in-texas/texas-voter-registration/

Utah: https://secure.utah.gov/voterreg/index.html

Vermont: https://sos.vermont.gov/elections/voters/registration/

Virginia: https://www.elections.virginia.gov/registration/

Washington: https://www.sos.wa.gov/elections/voters/voter-registration/register-vote-washington-state

West Virginia: https://ovr.sos.wv.gov/register/Landing

Wisconsin: https://myvote.wi.gov/en-us/Voter-Registration

Wyoming: https://sos.wyo.gov/Elections/State/RegisteringToVote.aspx

District of Columbia: https://vote.gov/register/dc/

American Samoa: https://aselectionoffice.gov/

Guam: https://gec.guam.gov/registering-to-vote/

Northern Mariana Islands: https://www.votecnmi.gov.mp/?ref=voteusa_en

Puerto Rico: https://ww2.ceepur.org/Home/Index?aspxerrorpath=/es-pr/Paginas/cee-english.aspx

United States Virgin Islands: https://vivote.gov/voters/register-to-vote/

"I live in a red state my vote doesn't ma-"

If your vote didn't matter they wouldn't try so hard to make it harder to vote in red states. Voting in red states can turn them into swing states like Georgia, Ohio, and Arizona. And voting in blue states can keep them from becoming swing states.

California used to be Red. Texas was Blue long ago. Florida was once a swing state. Obama took Indiana but it's gone redder since. Ten years ago Arizona and Georgia going blue was unthinkable.

Things change and we can make them change.

And that's before getting into more local elections. Turning cities blue, the state legislature.

Red states have flipped blue in recent years at those levels too.

Because people vote, and if we vote in high enough numbers we can turn a tight election into a walk in the park. If we vote in high enough numbers, we can turn a loss into a win. So many good things have happened in states where someone won by like 100 votes. (arizona is one)

[maddyjones2]

From the other side of the world - please vote. We need you to get this right

"I live in a red state my vote doesn't ma-"

If your vote didn't matter they wouldn't try so hard to make it harder to vote in red states. Voting in red states can turn them into swing states like Georgia, Ohio, and Arizona. And voting in blue states can keep them from becoming swing states.

California used to be Red. Texas was Blue long ago. Florida was once a swing state. Obama took Indiana but it's gone redder since. Ten years ago Arizona and Georgia going blue was unthinkable.

Things change and we can make them change.

And that's before getting into more local elections. Turning cities blue, the state legislature.

Red states have flipped blue in recent years at those levels too.

Because people vote, and if we vote in high enough numbers we can turn a tight election into a walk in the park. If we vote in high enough numbers, we can turn a loss into a win. So many good things have happened in states where someone won by like 100 votes. (arizona is one)