#service hallways

[occidentaltourist]

Lie still.

[theinfinitedivides]

'why did you do this?' 'there's someone i have to protect in my heart.' LEE HAE F*CKING RYEON WHO GAVE YOU THE RIGHT

[mikesbasementbeets]

mike & closets

[its-where-the-wild-things-are]

[crimsonmonsoon]

just found out from gloomy that you self id as a video game hater and there’s an loz poster in your room. you don’t deserve her I could treat her better what is wrong with you

I am NOT a video game hater I JUST SUCK AT VIDEO GAMES BECAUSE I WAS NEVER ALLOWED ANYTHING BEYOND THE MINECRAFT I HAD ON MY IPOD TOUCH and the loz poster IS MY ROOMMATE’S and I’ll have you know that there is also a HOLLOW NIGHT poster in my room because of the previously mentioned ROOMMIE who has INTERESTS and EXPRESSES THEM on HER SIDE OF THE ROOM

[girlbob-boypants]

Shout out to all my fellow resting bitch face people. ily all and we're all getting accused of shit that isn't true

[the-trans-dragon]

I'm not complaining exactly, but. Lol.

When reliable medical sources use the "assigned [sex] at birth" language...

I do appreciate it! When a medical article ignores transgender people, it lessens the credibility for me. If it says "This occurs more in women," I *know* what they are intending to convey, but theyre also telling me, "We studied cis people only." And as a trans person, I need my medical resources to account for my existence, y'know?

So when they say "More likely in people assigned female at birth," it's helpful! I now know that they know I exist, but...they're saying essentially the same thing, ei, "We studied cis people only (probably)."

I realize that there isn't better terminology for this stuff.

I have my own terms for these! And I am eagerly waiting for the medical community to figure out some terms too.

Currently I use "Estrogen-Dominant Hormone System" and "Testosterone-Dominwnt Hormone System." I came with those btw >:3 I'm rather proud of them!! You could also call it "Estrogen-Led Hormone System."

It isn't perfect, but it does ACTUALLY allow "cis women" and "trans people taking 'feminizing'* hormones" to exist in the same category, as opposed to saying "AFAB" and then trying to figure out how to handle any outliers taking 'masculinizing'* hormones.

*I don't really like this word to describe it. I'd personally call it "Estrogen-Dominant HRT" and "Testosterone-Dominant HRT." The latter might be a little redundant, but E-dominant HRTs vary widely, due to the option of using progesterone or androgen-blockers (and other meds that affect hormone levels); and simply calling it "Estrogen HRT" implies that it doesn't involve anything besides estrogen.

It STILL wouldn't INDICATE trans inclusivity, BUT. WHENEVER THEY GET AROUND TO INCLUDING TRANS PEOPLE it'll be very helpful.

It hopefully also accounts for intersex people (not perfectly; but it doesn't work perfectly for trans people; which is to say: it would function BEST as a stepping stone towards more comprehensive terminology).

Lastly, I think it would allow for some spectrums to be considered, rather than a strict binary. I think that, medically, it would be *infinitely* more valuable to consider "sex" in terms of "various hormones, in consideration of some 'normal' ranges and in consideration of the ratios comparing them with other hormones." Example:

ADHD meds and "females." ADHD meds have different efficacy throughout the monthly menstrual cycle. "Because of the way estrogen varies during the cycle." But I want *more* data.

Does estrogen alone change the efficacy?

Is it a combination of multiple hormones that fluctuate?

Is it because "Hormones A increased," or is it because "The Ratio of Hormones A to Hormone B increased?" Did the ratio increase? Maybe the other hormone experienced an even greater increase, causing the ratio to decrease.

I've tried to stitch together some sort of answer, but Im never satisfied with it. It's hard to integrate sources that use different ranges of normal, or that measure with a different unit, or that don't specify enough details to know how to combine it to another source.

I just want science to recognize trans people, and also recognize the actual complex science behind sex, rather than operating as if it's a simple binary with strict characteristics.

So I guess I AM complaining. But not about articles using AFAB/AMAB. I'm complaining about the unresolved limits, and exclusion of trans people.

[carcarrot]

ok thats it i literally need a new job now .

[martinsorbit]

what fnaf game do you guys think is the scariest? mine is fnaf 4 hands down

[djokeery]

just got home from watching tasm 2 in a theater for the first time in my life and everything is hitting me in layers

[riskrov]

once again crushing rude customers to dust in my bare hand

[jukeboxhound]

awwww my executive director described me as "wicked smart" to my department director and my gothy little heart is bashfully pleased

in other news i'm once again taking over legal services in addition to everything else i do and i am READY for assholes who think they can intimidate me in the courthouse ✪ ω ✪

[yoshistory]

? somehow my monthly rent is LESS than what was agreed on, with like, all the additional little things they throw on after the agreement. umm.. BUT... they are for some reason charging me valet trash which.... i dont actually get... so im gonna call and see if that can get nuked off my charges. which will make it even less per month. huh. weird.

[scarecrowscribe]

Service-space day-stack, exposed pieces.

I dunno, man. I just work here sometimes.

[oofuri2003]

[wip]

jaceni cringe comp jaceni cringe comp jaceni cr