#semi bi - a bisexual attracted to one single gender

[slashthrashandcrash]

My girlfriend (who's like, 5'5 btw) came wearing one of those "Straight white conservative male. Triggered?" Tshirt to our second date, and honestly i knew then I'd marry her.

My ex and I had matching shirts (that she custom ordered) that said "Sapphic Straight" for me and "Semi Bi" for her after we found those definitions somewhere online and I actually did almost marry her

[yes0another0outsiders0blog]

Hey, I am working on longer headcanons and stuff currently. Work is being a lot, though, and my brain isn't staying still long enough to do more than a bit at a time. So, in the meantime--

The Outsiders Queer Headcanons : (Part 1)

Kind of modern au? Most of these labels didn't really exist in the 60s and they probably wouldn't be thinking of labels or processing their queer feelings like that back then, but I think if they had the labels and were in a more accepting society this is what they'd identify as.

Warning : homophobia, I can't write about a group of men from the conservative southern 1960s and their queerness semi-realistically without touching on it

Ponyboy -

biromantic, demisexual

preference towards men, but not a strong one... like, 60/40 split

personally, I ship Purly, so there's that. also, Pony 100% really started experimenting in college. like, him and Curly had some mutual feelings before, he went to college and came back like "OH, okay, yeah I like guys, cool," and an actual relationship came from that

Sodapop -

pansexual, doesn't care about gender in the slightest

is probably the most chill with lgbt stuff from the beginning. even outside of modern au, if someone was openly queer around the gang then everyone else would be at varying levels of uncomfortable (because, uh, conservative southern 60s), but Soda would just be like "you know what, good for them!! they seem happy!!"

wouldn't seek it out on his own, but if he was introduced into the lgbt community he'd DEFINITELY get into experimenting with gender. still cis, but plays with drag occasionally and gets damn good at it.

actually doesn't really care about gender at all. won't consider himself anything other than a guy, he was raised a guy and doesn't have any issues with that or any reason to say otherwise, but also doesn't have any strong connection to it. you could call him anything (gender-wise) and he'd be chill. technically, cassgender would describe him accurately, but it don't think he'd use the label because it wouldn't really be saying anything important to him.

Darry -

unfortunately, that is a Heterosexual Man. (nothing wrong with straight people, I'm just a gay genderqueer femboy that happens to lowkey be a Darry simp, so it's unfortunate that I can't see him any other way--)

tries really hard to be an ally because his brothers very much date men, but struggles a tiny bit

wouldn't be mean to a queer person, but is very confused and uncomfortable with the topic because it's unfamiliar to him

asks a lot of kind of awkward questions. like, wants to understand and is trying, but it comes out so weird.

bless his heart

Two-Bit -

probably straight... heteroflexible?

has only dated women, has only been attracted to women, but is open minded

when he's single, he talks about a future partner pretty neutrally or says things like, "when I have a wife, or husband idk I'm not a psychic--"

makes really homophobic jokes out of discomfort, uses humor to cope and is just super not use to gay people. not doing it maliciously, but sometimes says things that are pretty terrible without meaning to

if called out, he'll stop (to an extent, he'll still take the easy opportunity for a dumb joke, but he isn't saying anything horribly offensive anymore), he just genuinely did not know that what he was saying was actually really awful

Steve -

bisexual and incredibly homophobic

so mad about being attracted to men. the fact that he PREFERS men? disgusting.

all of the characters have internalized homophobia, but none half as powerful as this man's.

the type to say that he'd "never choose to be gay" and honestly does think (or maybe just convinces himself) that it's a choice. thinks that everyone is essentially bi but "chooses" their sexuality based on which attractions they act on. desperately does not want to be wrong (but is very much wrong)

would probably have a secret "casual" relationship for a LONG time before he can't do it anymore and is forced to accept that he's into men for real

you'd think that being best friends with Soda, the most chill person ever with this stuff, would help. maybe it does and god knows how long it would take Steve to come around without him. but it still takes him SO long to just be okay with any of it.

he does grow out of being terrible about it (maybe not fully, but at least mostly), it just takes a TON of time and a good handful of mental breakdowns to get there

Johnny -

unlabeled, struggles to tell if he's aroace-spec or if he just has trouble being close to people due to trauma. isn't sure if the two are connected or how, doesn't really like thinking about it for too long.

he also has trouble distinguishing different types of attraction at all.

basically just along for the ride whenever it comes to his sexuality. if he's attracted to someone, then alright. he's spent a long time trying to figure attraction out to only end up more confused, he might wonder about it when he does get a crush but he isn't actively deep-diving into his feelings and searching for accurate labels.

Dally -

bisexual, heavy preference towards women though

would probably never act on feelings towards a guy, those kind of really scare him. but he has seen a good handful of guys that he's just fully, undeniably attracted to, so he knows damn well it's a lie to call himself straight

(he's still going to, tho)

also, demiromantic

denies that he's romantically interested in anyone ever, but he does feel that attraction. he just has to have a bit of trust before he can feel it.

not actually explicitly homophobic, genuinely does not care what other people do with their lives, but he's a piece of shit in general so he'll definitely see a queer person as an easy target. he's the type of person to use anything he can to start something, he's going to use someone being a minority against them just because he's a fucking ass.

[brooklynislandgirl]

Roleplaying Profile Meme:

PLEASE REPOST, DO NOT REBLOG!  Feel free to add to any of your answers!  The purpose is to tell your partners about the way you write!  For the multiple-choice ones, BOLD all that apply and, if you want, italicize if it’s a conditional answer!

– B A S I C S –

NAME :  Turtle, Turtlemun, Turtlemama, and some call me...D.

ARE YOU OVER 18? Yes / No

IS YOUR MUSE? Yes / No

ARE YOU SELECTIVE ABOUT WHO YOU WRITE WITH ON THIS BLOG? No (anyone) / Semi / Yes / Highly / Private

ARE YOU SELECTIVE ABOUT WHO YOU FOLLOW ON THIS BLOG? No (anyone) / Semi / Yes / Highly / private

IF YOUR MUSE IS CANON, HOW MUCH TO YOU ADHERE TO CANON? Not at all / A little / Somewhat / Mostly / Strictly / OC {although if my partner is a canon character, I will ask where in the canon our rp falls, and I will stick to YOUR canon/personal canon as much as possible}

WHAT POST LENGTHS DO YOU WRITE? One Liners / Single-Para / Multi-Para / Novella 

DO YOU USE ICONS AND/OR GIFS? No / Gifs /Icons/ Gifcons

DO YOU WRITE ON OTHER PLATFORMS? No / Yes {{I will write on discord if I am comfortable enough with my partner}}

WHAT LEVEL OF PLOTS DO YOU WRITE? Unplotted / Open-Ended Plots / Semi-Plotted / Fully Plotted Epics

HOW QUICKLY DO YOU USUALLY RESPOND TO THREADS? I am a Turtle /Slow / Fast  / Very Fast {{depends on my time/availability/level of capability that day, but my speed or lack thereof should never be taken as an indication of my desire to write with you, or be used to doubt my love for you, your muse, and our stories.}}

WHAT TYPES OF THEMES DO YOU LIKE? (feel free to add!) Fluff / Angst / Smut / Action / Tragedy / Domestic / Family / Conversational / Hurt-Comfort / Fantasy / Dark

WHAT GENRES DO YOU LIKE? (feel free to add!) Fantasy / Supernatural / Science Fiction / Historical / Horror / Comedy / Romance / Drama / Action / Adventure / Espionage / Everything

ARE THERE ANY THEMES YOU’RE UNCOMFORTABLE WRITING ON YOUR BLOG? No / Yes   {{Beth and I both generally loathe child abuse in any shape or form, and mentions of it are fine, but if your muse deliberately harms a child in front of us, please expect to be reacted to in the most honest way possible}}

DO YOU HAVE ANY TRIGGERS?  HOW DO YOU REQUEST IT TAGGED? No/ Yes {{I try to tag everything properly with Whatever Trigger tw, though specifically I use Here Brucie|Sharks and Lost In Translation || N F S W for those two subjects. I have a fear of spiders so a spider tw would be nice, though I am never going to be so freaked out that it will drive me away from the dash or your blog}}

– S H I P P I N G –

WHAT TYPES OF RELATIONSHIPS ARE YOU OPEN TO? Romantic / Platonic /Familial / Physical / Sexual / Enemies (Aaaaall the relationship types)

WHAT TYPES OF PRE-ESTABLISHED RELATIONSHIPS ARE YOU OPEN TO? Romantic / Platonic / Familial / Physical / Sexual

DO YOU HAVE OTPS? No / Chemistry only /Yes

WHAT IS YOUR MUSE’S SEXUAL ORIENTATION? - Heterosexual / Heteroflexible / Bisexual / Homoflexible / Homosexual / Pansexual / Demisexual / Asexual / Questioning {{Beth is demisexual. She doesn't experience sexual attraction until she feels deeply connected to someone. And even then, she isn't likely to act on it. She says she is heteroflexible because most of her attractions have been toward males/masculine folk, though in play she has had 2 attractions toward women, and 1 towards a bi-gendered person {leaning toward xer feminine presentation} and of course she would never be prejudice toward non-human/human-like individuals}}

WHAT IS YOUR MUSE’S ROMANTIC ORIENTATION? - Heteroromantic / Heteroflexible / Biromantic / Homoflexible / Homoromantic / Panromantic / Demiromantic / Grayromantic / Aromantic / Polyamorous / Questioning {{The best fitting attraction I could find for Beth is Quoiromantic. Meaning Beth doesn't understand/differentiate really distinguish levels of emotion. To her, love is love and the only difference is an abrupt and often confusing layer of personal rules that she just doesn't get. Which makes relationships complicated. I'm sorry.}}

ARE YOU COMFORTABLE WRITING SMUT? No / Selectively / Yes

ARE YOU AN EXCLUSIVE SHIPPER? No / Sometimes / Yes {{I don't force ships. The only expectation I have to to be allowed to let a relationship grow organically and allow it to be what it is. Sometimes she'll friend or family zone a person. Sometimes she will have a squish or legitimate feelings for someone who doesn't feel the same way. Sometimes you have to get out the squirt bottle and spray her in the face because she's so in love. But I promise it should never be an issue. If it is, please tell me and I will put a muzzle on her.}}

DOES CRACK SHIPPING EVER HAPPEN? No /Sometimes / Yes {{Maybe? I don't know what this is?}}

DOES CROSSOVER SHIPPING EVER HAPPEN? No / Yes/ Depends

[thelostgirl21]

While I absolutely love this, I would just like to remind people to be very careful not to assume that all people that identify as "pansexual" are comfortable with using the terms "multisexual", and/or "multiple genders sexual attraction" (M-spec), to describe their sexual orientation, too.

Because, like many sex-positive/favorable and sex-neutral asexuals, I can absolutely enjoy having sex with people I'm not sexually attracted to.

And, while I can 100% respect that an asexual would feel comfortable calling themselves a "bisexual asexual", to mean "I lack the capacity to find another person sexually attractive. However, I do find having sex with people of all gender identities and expressions to be enjoyable", I personally tend to feel dysphoric using labels that reinforce the idea that what motivates human sexual behavior is tied to the way we feel attracted to people of different genders.

Because sadly, a lot of allosexuals tend to assume that, as soon as you are comfortable having sex with another person, that means you find them sexually attractive.

And yet, sexuality also exists outside of the way we respond to other people's gender identities and expressions.

i.e. I don't need to find a flashing neon pink rotating and vibrating dolphin dildo sexually attractive to masturbate with it!

Similarly, I can "turn myself on" all by myself, and then kindly ask a close friend or romantic partner if I could, perchance, "borrow" a pair of hands, mouth/tongue, or a penis (if they've got one, regardless of gender) to get myself off!

Finding a person sexually attractive is not a prerequisite - at all - to be able to enjoy "masturbating with a partner" ("team sex" ) rather than on my own ("solo sex")!

Similarly, it's theoretically possible for a man that only has the ability to be sexually turned on by fellow men to enjoy having sex with women in the absence of any sexual attraction towards them.

As long as he is not sexually repulsed by women (or that one woman in particular, at least) and can maintain his arousal, he can have a very good time with her!

That man can still identify as being exclusively "gay", and he'd be 100% right, because he's genuinely exclusively sexually attracted towards men.

Or he might decide to call himself a "bisexual gay"; and again, he'd technically be right! Because he's monosexually attracted exclusively towards men (gay), but he's also able to enjoy sex with people of more than one gender identity and expression regardless of sexual attraction (what some would also define as being bisexual).

Or he might call himself "bisexual" to express that the has the ability to enjoy sex with more than a single gender, regardless of being exclusively able to find fellow men sexually attractive.

He might also use labels like "bi-curious", or "semi-bisexual", etc.; because he feels a clear sexual pull / orientation towards men, but no sexual pull / orientation towards women; and yet he might have developed an acquired taste for some of the advantages that come with having sex with a partner in the absence of sexual attraction, and will occasionally be open to or even actively seek to have sex with women regardless of attraction.

Human sexuality is a very complex phenomenon, and what motivates - or orients - sexual behavior goes way beyond gender and sexual attraction.

Especially when you aren't 100% asexual (I'm a demisexual sapiosexual, so capable of sexual attraction under certain circumstances) and tend to experience each main emotional and physical forms of attraction very distinctly from one another.

When it comes to emotional attraction, I consider myself to be:

Panplatonic (gender plays no role in how I experience primary and secondary squishes),

Panalterous (gender plays no role in how I experience primary and secondary meshes),

Panromantic (gender plays no role in how I experience primary and secondary crushes).

And, when it comes to physical attraction:

Biaesthetic (I have the capacity to be aesthetically attracted to various forms of gender expressions, and enjoy expressing them as well in the context of an artistic performance. But I have no preference in gender when it comes to experiencing primary and secondary swishes, and any biaesthetic attraction I can experience tend to be restricted to a context of artistic performance),

Pansensual (gender plays no role in how I experience primary and secondary lushes),

Sex-neutral demisexual, sapiosexual, and pansexual (I do not have the capacity to experience primary sexual attraction. However, I can experience the occasional secondary sexual attraction towards someone I've closely emotionally bonded with (ex: a close friend, a queerplatonic partner or a romantic partner), whose mind I'm fascinated with / turned on by and perceive as being a "geek" (with a slight preference towards neurodivergent geeks), and who I find minimally aesthetically attractive. Gender plays no role in how I experience secondary smushes).

Therefore, I can understand how someone that typically feels a natural progression between each form of physical attraction might be more comfortable defining their sexuality in terms of behavior rather than attraction, or feel like they are synonymous.

When finding someone aesthetically good looking tends to inspire you to become sensually intimate with them, and you get naturally sexually attracted to / turned on by kissing them, caressing them, and cuddling with them; then you might feel like "It's all connected!" and there's no need to differentiate between each attraction the way I do!

But, when most people that you could spend hours feasting your eyes upon (the same way you would a gorgeous painting at an art gallery) do not inspire you any desire to touch or be touched by them.

And/or passionate french kisses, cuddles, and sensual caresses typically don't inspire you any sexual urge at all (they aren't perceived as sexual foreplay)...

And/or you tend to get more sexually aroused by / attracted to your close friends that you have no interest in dating or getting amorously involved with (or maybe queerplatonically), than a person you feel a strong romantic crush on...

And/or what triggers the urge to have sex ASAP with your life partner is them passionately geeking out about how car lithium batteries work!

Well, let's say all those divisions between the different types of emotional and physical attractions help you figuring yourself out and keeping track of what's going on in your relationships!

And the difference between what I call biaesthetic and pansexual attraction matters a lot to me.

My sexual orientation is about who I am as a person, and I feel more strongly about being a demisexual, a sapiosexual, a pansexual, a biaesthetic, etc. when it comes to my sense of identity, than I care about my gender (I'm a genderless woman).

So, I tend to strongly object to the idea of labeling myself based on what the genders of the people I can have sex with are.

I use pansexual to mean "other people's gender are not a part of nor play any role in my sexual orientation."

You could ask "Why don't you just use demisexual and sapiosexual then, if you only consider that demisexuality and sapiosexuality are the two orientations that truly define your sexual identity?"

Well, because you can also be demisexual and/or sapiosexual, and only be sexually attracted toward genders that are different than your own (and in that case be either sexually positive, neutral, or repulsed by your own gender when you do experience some sexual attraction towards another person).

If I don't say anything about the gender of the people I have the capacity to have sex with (with or without being sexually attracted to them), people will assume that I'm either straight or gay based on the gender of my sexual partner(s).

But the whole concept of experiencing homosexual or heterosexual desire towards another person feels very alien to me.

So, I believe the bottom line really is to respect people's need to define themselves using labels based on what those labels represent for them and connect with the concept of who they are.

And to be mindful that not every person that has sexual partners finds them sexually attractive.

Therefore it is important to avoid insisting that what all bisexuals, pansexuals, omnisexuals and polysexuals have in common is that they are "multisexual", i.e. sexually attracted towards many gender identities / expressions.

We all share the capacity to have sex with partners of multiple genders regardless of sexual attraction. True.

But among people using all those labels not all of us are able to be sexually attracted towards people, or attracted towards multiple genders.

But yes, I do 100% believe there is room for all of us to share those spaces together, and I do feel a strong kinship towards people using the term pansexual to mean other things than I do, and towards people using the term bisexual as well (especially since I suspect many bisexuals to probably be biaesthetically oriented as well!) to mean the same thing or other things than I do.

We are supposed to make each other feel safe, loved, and accepted as we are. At the end of the day that is what matters most.

Infographic about how many multisexual/mspec ppl are technically bi and can consider themselves as bi also if they want or just use other terms if they want.

Based on the original from this post, which is about how gnc women can still be women and don't have to id as nonbinary just bc they are gnc. I posted this in a reblog to that post, but felt it deserves its own post as well.

To be clear, I get why you may not want to call yourself bisexual even if it technically fits. I'm bisexual, too, but I've felt like that plenty of times in the past several years. Using only other terms for your sexuality is fine as well, or you can call yourself bi and other terms (e.g. bi and pansexual).

[silentfoxproductions]

RECLAIMING SEMIBISEXUAL

So originally semibi was quite biphobic in its def

"Semi-Bisexual: A term used to describe "bisexuals that are only attracted to one gender." This is a biphobic identity (as it is impossible to like a single gender and be bi) and misconstrues how bisexual preferences and/or fluidity works." From the lgbtqia+ wiki under Harmful Terminology.

Now the origin is biphobic, so I'm reclaiming it.

Introducing...

SEMI-ORIENTATIONS!!

Where someone doesn't feel completely a sexuality, they use semi. So a semibisexual would be someone who maybe identifies as Pan, but bisexuality is still a part of their identity so they are sorta bi. Or vice versa. Semipan! I'll work on flags later ig, feel free to announce criticism or add to the defs!

[digitalworldbound]

The Chosen’s Sexuality Headcanons

Happy (Belated) Pride Month!

🧡Taichi - Bisexual ~ Taichi is the type of guy to love everyone, you know? I feel like in terms of romance, he’d rather just have someone that he truly loves, and wouldn’t worry about the gender. (also, he lowkey had a crush on Sora and Yamato). 

💙Yamato - Demisexual ~ Yamato is the type to only develop romantic feelings only under specific circumstances, like emotionally bonding after saving the world multiple times or something.

❤Sora - Lesbian ~ As Sora's mom seems very conservative (making her daughter quit a male-dominated hobby for something more feminine), so I feel that Sora wouldn't talk openly with her about her crushes on girls. It isn't until that she joins the tennis team that she finds another girl questioning herself. Sora, still, is pretty lowkey about any girlfriends she has (her mom still doesn't know!!)

💜Koushiro - Queer ~ Koushiro isn’t one to put labels on himself, and is open to finding a partner. He just wants to fall in love and have semi-philosophical conversations late into the night. 

💚Mimi - Bisexual ~ Mimi loves girls so much?? and boys are so cute?? She was the first of the Chosen to publicly come out, though most of them already knew after she drunkenly made out with Miyako one night. 

🖤Jou - Graysexual ~ Jou is too busy to focus on sexual desire or love, though one day he would like to. For now, he identifies as graysexual, which suits him just fine. 

💛Takeru - Pansexual ~ All Takeru has ever wanted is to be in love. He wants to find someone with similar interests and a good sense of humor; gender does not matter. The boy just wants cuddles and hot chocolate.

💓Hikari - Bi-curious ~ Out of all the Chosen, Hikari is the most introspective. She knows herself well, and while she hasn't met a female that she is romantically attracted to, she keeps her mind open to the possibility.

🧡💙Daisuke - Gay ~ For a moment there, he really thought he was in love with Hikari. I mean, she smelled like strawberries, ya know? But it's when Ken opens up to him for the first time fully - about Osamu and the Dark Ocean - that it clicks. Though Ken has snot running down his face and his eyes are all swollen, the sight of him takes Daisuke's breath away. (And he also smells like lavender, which is a plus!)

❤💚Miyako - Bisexual ~ Spending quality time with Sora and Mimi lead to her sexual awakening. Miyako had always been boy crazy (she's had a crush on every single Chosen guy - except Iori) ((Please don't ask about her Daisuke phase, it's too soon)). Before labeling herself, she probably read some very tasteful manga did 💅🏻her💅🏻 research . We love an educated QWEEN.

🖤💜Iori - Asexual ~ Sex has a practical use. Humans need to repopulate, this is a fact. Iori...just doesn't want sex. At all. And that's okay. ((He does want cute lil movie dates and making cookies at 1 a.m. tho 👀))

💟Ken - Gay ~ There was no "realization"; he just always was. He had only ever had crushes on guys and any female advances made him uncomfortable. He first non-Leonardo-DiCaprio crush was (is) probably Daisuke, tbh.

[waywardfeathered]

ROLEPLAYING PROFILE MEME: PLEASE REPOST, DO NOT REBLOG!  Feel free to add to any of your answers!  The purpose is to tell your partners about the way you write!  For the multiple-choice ones, BOLD all that apply and, if you want, italicize if it’s a conditional answer!

—BASICS—

NAME: havu (& heli as i’m yet to change my name on the rpc, i use both irl)

ARE YOU OVER 18? Yes (i am 28) / No

IS YOUR MUSE? Yes / No

ARE YOU SELECTIVE ABOUT WHO YOU WRITE WITH ON THIS BLOG? No / Semi / Yes / Highly / Private

IF YOUR MUSE IS CANON, HOW MUCH DO YOU ADHERE TO CANON? Not at all / A little / Somewhat / Mostly / Strictly /

WHAT POST LENGTHS DO YOU WRITE? One Liners / Single-Para / Multi-Para / Novella

WHAT LEVEL OF PLOTS DO YOU WRITE? Unplotted  / Open-Ended Plots / Semi-Plotted / Fully Plotted Epics

HOW QUICKLY DO YOU USUALLY RESPOND TO THREADS? Very Slow / Slow (3-4 Weeks) / Average (1-2 Weeks) / Fast (Less Than One Week) / Very Fast (Less Than Three Days) / honestly it varies so much & depends on how busy i am & what my mental health is any given day!

WHAT TYPES OF THEMES DO YOU LIKE? (feel free to add!) Fluff / Angst / Smut / Action / Tragedy / Domestic / Family / Conversational / Hurt-Comfort / Slice of life / hard to say/kind of prefer storylines with a combo of all of the genres.

WHAT GENRES DO YOU LIKE? (feel free to add!) High Fantasy / Supernatural (lol) / Science Fiction / Historical / Horror  / Comedy / Romance / Drama / Action (i like it i’m just awful at writing it lol) / Adventure / Espionage / Everything

ARE THERE ANY THEMES YOU’RE UNCOMFORTABLE WRITING ON YOUR BLOG? No / Yes (hard to say from the top of my head but i’m capable of saying no if something makes me uncomfy!)

DO YOU HAVE ANY TRIGGERS?  HOW DO YOU REQUEST IT TAGGED? No / Yes, but it triggers me to talk about my triggers so i can’t request tags. joys of anxiety.

—SHIPPING—

WHAT TYPES OF RELATIONSHIPS ARE YOU OPEN TO? Romantic / Platonic / Familial / Sexual

WHAT TYPES OF PRE-ESTABLISHED RELATIONSHIPS ARE YOU OPEN TO? Romantic / Platonic / Familial / Sexual (just communicate with me if you want to pre-establish smth? i’m not a mind reader!)

DO YOU HAVE OTPS? No / Yes, but i ship anything that has chemistry!

DO YOU HAVE NOTPS? No / Yes

WHAT IS YOUR MUSE’S SEXUAL ORIENTATION? - Heterosexual / Heteroflexible / Bisexual / Homoflexible / Homosexual / Pansexual / Demisexual / Asexual / Questioning

WHAT IS YOUR MUSE’S ROMANTIC ORIENTATION? - Heteroromantic / Heteroflexible / Biromantic / Homoflexible / Homoromantic / Panromantic / Demiromantic / Grayromantic / Aromantic / Polyamorous / Questioning

*i use bi and pan interchangeably now after educating myself a bit on the origins of both terms, but what i mean is: gender doesn’t matter to him, re: attraction. **i can’t believe i had to delete “sapiosexual” from the list, that’s not a real sexual orientation, that’s just some really ableist shit. like don’t @ me, just google why it’s ableist, i’m not up for this debate.

ARE YOU COMFORTABLE WRITING SMUT? No / Selectively / Yes

HOW EARLY IN A RELATIONSHIP DO YOU SHIP ROMANTICALLY? Autoship / During Plotting / After A Couple IC Interactions / Several IC Interactions / Slow Burn / Depends on partner & muse

ARE YOU/YOUR MUSE OPEN TO TOXIC SHIPS? No / Selectively / Yes (not abusive ships, but toxic? hekk yes)

ARE YOU/YOUR MUSE OPEN TO PROBLEMATIC SHIPS? (canon history, age difference, complicated, etc.) No / Selectively / Yes (what the fuck does this even mean? i’m open to ships with consenting adults that are not incest. “problematic” is a vague phrasing.)

ARE YOU/YOUR MUSE OPEN TO POLYAMSHIPPING? No / Selectively / Yes

ARE YOU AN EXCLUSIVE SHIPPER? No / Sometimes / Yes

DOES CRACK SHIPPING EVER HAPPEN? No / Sometimes / Yes

DOES CROSSOVER SHIPPING EVER HAPPEN? No / Yes / Depends

tagged by: stolen from the dash! ​ tagging: steal it and tag me if you like!

[blairwaldcrf]

Questions For LGBT Ladies #LGBTask

Here are some random questions pertaining to LGBT Ladies. Have others ask you or simply answer them yourself. Please reblog!

((I’m just going to answer them all because I’m bored and very vain))

1. How do you define your sexuality?  I identify with the label of bisexual, but my friends tell me i’m probably more pan

2. At what age did you first realize that you like girls? when I was 12 i freaked out because i noticed that girls in my grade were getting boobs and that made me feel things lmao, but i didn’t hardcore fall for someone till i was 17

3. At what age did you first come out? 17 to all of my friends, coworkers, and one of my cousins, 25 to my (mormon) biological family

4. Who was the first person you came out to? How did they take it? my cousin, who was gay and obviously very supportive... they’re now living a full life as a married transgender woman and inspire me every day! 

5. How out are you?  completely! flaming bi!

6. Has coming out lost you any friends? it did in high school, because most of my friends were mormon, but pretty much all of them came around

7. What is your current relationship status? single, trying to get over my ex fiance? type person

8. How many LGBT friends do you have? lol, um i’m blanking on all of them but i know at least 7 that i talk to frequently

9. Do you have any LGBT relatives? yep! one transgender/poly/pan cousin from my dad’s side... and i’m the gay cousin for my mom’s side lmao

10. Have you ever cut your hair super short? in elementary school my mom gave me the shortest pixie cut ever and everyone thought i was a boy... since then I’ve cut it semi short but never shorter than beside my ears

11. How often do you wear flannel? surprisingly not that often, i only have two flannel shirts

12. How much do you like cats? like at least 60% depending on the cat

13. Do you wear skirts and dresses? If so, how often?  i freaking love wearing dresses, but i hate skirts... dresses are like the least maintenance clothing ever

14. Do you wear high heels? If so, how often?  um no, they’re not my thing

15. Do you have any tattoos? If so, what of and where? yep, a cactus on my ankle

16. How accurate is your gaydar? 90%

17. Have you ever been to a gay bar or a gay club?  yes!!

18.  How do you feel when platonic female friends refer to each other as girlfriends?   fucking annoyed tbh

19. Have you ever had a crush on a straight girl?  hasn’t everyone??

20. Ellen or Portia?  Portia for sure, although i love my girl Ellen

21. Is your nose pierced?  nah

22 Would you ever want to get married, if not already?  i’m a hopeless romantic

23. Will you wear a dress for your wedding?  oooh yes and hopefully my wife will too

24. Would you ever want to give birth?  oh i would love to but i can’t physically

25. Have you ever watched The L Word? lmfao yes i’m a good bi

26. Have you ever dated a guy?  yep, and regretted it 7/10 times

27. How do you feel when someone uses the word gay to mean stupid, dumb, or boring?   obviously annoyed

28. How many rainbow items do you own? umm at least one flag

29. Have you ever been to a pride festival?  yes, i even got to walk in it!

30. Have you ever celebrated National Coming Out Day (October 11)? yes

31. Have you ever participated in the National Day of Silence? yes

32. Have you ever worn a woman’s suit?  hell yeah in middle school lmao

33. Have you ever worn any men’s clothing?  um i mean “men’s clothing” is a subjective term, but like I’ve worn men’s boxers and shit...?

34. Do you eat meat?  i love meat

35. Do you consider yourself a feminist? yep!

36. Who is your favorite LGBT celebrity?  ahhh, um... probably Ellen? Although Adam Rippon is starting to sway me lmao

37. Are you religious at all?  not particularly, although sort of neobuddhist/wiccan

38. How often do you find yourself trying to sneak a peak or staring at a cute female?   15/10 times

39. What is your ideal first date?   like, just any date where i’m with a girl tbh

40. Are you comfortable with terms such as lezzie, lesbo, dyke, or tranny?  sort of okay with lesbo, but the rest are offensive to me

41. How outdoorsy are you?  i fucking love camping and mountains

42. In general, has being open about your sexuality affected your relationships with other females?   yes, some lesbians i’ve dated were super biphobic

43. How much makeup do you typically wear?  in public, plenty. at home, none

44. Have you ever attended a gay or lesbian wedding?  yep!

45. Are you more feminine or more masculine?  i’m genderfluid, but slightly more masculine

46. How long is the longest relationship you’ve been in? Are you still with that person?  5 years, and no

47. Have you and a girlfriend ever been mistaken for sisters?  nope

48. Do you think it is possible for someone to truly be a 50/50 bisexual, or is the percentage always skewed in favor of one gender?   ugh this is literally the fucking worst question. bisexuality is valid no matter the percentage of any gender attraction you bitch muffin

49. Have you ever wished you were completely straight?   no tbh

50. Do you watch any LGBT YouTubers?  Rose and Rosie

51. Do you wear any combat boots, Doc Martins, or Timberlands?  combat boots

52. Have you ever been hit on by another female?   yes it’s an electrifying experience

53. How athletic are you?  i stand up sometimes

54. What are your views on gender identity and bathroom use?  free bathrooms

55. What is your opinion of septum/bull nose piercings?  not my thing

56. What does equality mean to you?  that everyone has an equal chance to achieve the same goal

57. If you are not a lesbian, about what percentage of the time do you find yourself attracted to other females?  99.9%

58. Have you ever shared clothes with a girlfriend?  lol yes it’s the best

59. Have you ever liked or dated a girl with the same name as you?  nah

60. How flirty are you?  pretty flirty, i’m a libra

61. Are you a virgin?  virginity is a construct, but no

62. Do you listen to any LGBT musicians (i.e. Tegan & Sara, Melissa Ehteridge, Chely Wright, Elton John, Sam Smith, George Michael, Adam Lambert)? in highschool me and my exgf would rock to emo tegan & sara

63. Have you ever been told that you are too pretty to be gay?   yep

64. Have you ever been discriminated against because of your sexuality or gender identity? If so, please explain.   all the fucking time... i don’t want a threesome, i’m not going to cheat because i’m bi, etc etc

65. Have you ever driven an SUV, Jeep, or a pickup truck?   nah

66. Are you or have you ever been a tomboy?   oooh boy, let me tell you. yes

67. Agree or disagree: Everyone is at least a little bit gay.  ummm, 90%?

68. What personality trait are you most attracted to?  intelligence

69. Boobs or butts?  boobs

70. Beer or wine?   hard liquor

71. Do you have a favorite lesbian movie?   ... it’s still Imagine Me & You... the leads are so god-tier beautiful

72. From 1-10, how attractive are muscular women?  9

73. From 1-10, how attractive are women who wear glasses? this is dumb

74. From 1-10, how attractive are women who are covered with tattoos? 8

75. From 1-10, how attractive are curvy/plus-size women? 9

76. From 1-10, how attractive are women with short hair? 6

77. From 1-10, how attractive are masculine butch women? 4

78. From 1-10, how attractive are highly intelligent women? 10

79. From 1-10, how attractive are tall women (i.e. around 6 feet or taller)? 7

80. Have you ever been on your period the same time as a girlfriend? lol yes

81. Has a girl ever dumped you for a guy? Have you?  i dumped a girl who was cheating on me with a guy

82. Do you carry a purse?  yes?

83. Do you wear any hats such as snapbacks or beanies? yes

84. Have you ever pretended to be completely straight? nope

85. Would you ever date a trans girl? yes!

86. How well do you think LGBT women are portrayed on television? not extremely well, but it’s getting better

87. Have you ever had a crush on a woman who’s much older than you?  Sandra Bullock..

88. Do you have any celebrity crushes? fucking Gal Gadot man

89. Do you have any opinions on LGBT people in the military?  keep them safe and start regulating sexual assault of all military members

90. Do you believe in love at first sight?  no

91. Have you ever been told that you look gay (i.e. like a lesbian)?  occasionally, depending on what i’m wearing

92. Where do you think is the best place to meet a potential lover? fuck if i know

93. Is there such a thing as “good” lesbian porn?  yes... if it’s made by lesbians

94. Have you ever had a one night stand?  lol yes, but not with girls

95. How often do you wear a bra? 91% of the time

96. Have you ever been part of a softball team?  lol no

97. If you could live your life all over again, would you still be attracted to other women?  honestly i’d rather be attracted to only women instead of being bi

98. What stereotype about LGBT women do you disagree with the most?  that bi women don’t belong

99. What advice would you give a girl who is struggling to figure out her sexuality?   watch Imagine Me & You

100. What advice would you give a girl who is struggling to come out?  it takes time... just let it happen and know that the time will come naturally

@caiterprince and @angryfinnstan  who I know are wlw, you should answer some of these if you want because i love you and want to get to know more!!!

[aroacehogwarts]

Today in HP History...

Minerva McGonagall and Filius Flitwick are having one of their weekly meetups to destress and hang out because they’re becoming fast friends. Filius is feeling really comfortable, so decides to share that he’s graya and gay. Minerva takes his hand, and he can immediately see from her smile that she understands. She’s suddenly overwhelmed with memories and can’t find the words to say that she used to be a lesbian and has been simply uninterested since her dear Elphinstone (who gets misgendered even in her death) passed away, but you don’t always need words with friends.

Andromeda Black came out to Ted Tonks as a (mostly closeted) trans woman. He thanked her for trusting him so much, came out as bi and demisexual, and asked if she’d like to try dating one day.

Sirius confides to Peter that he thinks he’s genderfluid  and bi and grayasexual but totally confused and unsure, while Peter does his best to support his friend and help him without making it seem like it’s not allowed to be confused. Remus lays in his bed, very, very still and very, very aware of the moment he’s accidentally intruded on, unable to move but resolved to come out as a grayro bi trans boy to his friends this week. They accepted his lycanthropy really well, so he’s hoping his sexuality and gender will go just as well.

Lily admits to James that she’s a demigirl and bi and was in denial about both for a long time and James admits he’s asexual and that’s why he’s been so nervous around her lately. It explains a lot and beings their journey of deep friendship, which leads to a very happy marriage.

Bill comes out to Charlie as bi and gets a brotherly slap on the back. Five seconds later, Charlie’s going “wait what” and that’s how they realize together that Charlie is aroace.

Charlie excitedly shares with Tonks that he’s aroace. Tonks peps up and goes “well then it’s a good time for this” and tells Charlie she’s totally queer, queer as fuck, queer in her attraction to all sorts of genders and queer in gender and queer in how she wants to express all of that.

Lee confesses that he’s bigender and bisexual to the twins. They offer to throw them a pride party and when they decline, the twins whisper all sorts of affirmations to them all week long every single time they pass each other.

Oliver admits to a probing Percy that he is aromantic and does sometimes want sex but is far more interested in quidditch to pursue anything. Percy almost tells Oliver that he’s gay, but he thinks of all his younger siblings in Hogwarts and his fear of word getting back to mum and dad, so purses his lips and continues to let his eyes wander over to Oliver’s strong arms every now and then when he studies.

Hermione’s been waiting five years to finally be able to say this out loud, and today she does it. She tells her best friends that she’s a trans woman and a lesbian and demiro and very shy about it all. Ron and Harry have lots of questions that Ginny and Luna are there to help answer. The process results in Luna admitting she’s aro/aceflux and pan and genderfluid, Ginny coming out as so very ply, Harry realizing he’s bigender and aroace, and Ron starting to come to terms with being gay.

Happy (US) Coming Out Day! To all those questioning, confused, who absolutely know their identity, out, semi-out, and completely closeted! You are all valid!

~Hufflepuff Mod

[lawlightfan42069]

iyo when you write non-straight characters should you specify their sexuality/gender? I mean I'm personally a very 'not into labels at all' person for my own sexuality but support ppl who do find comfort in labels. but when I write I also tend to go toward the 'he just loves who he loves !!!' that sounded stupid but idk how to explain it.. so... like I was wondering why you feel strongly about explicitly stating someone's queerness instead of it being implied (at least u come off as that sorta)

i do definitely feel like that so!! i happen to have a lot of feelings about this so get ready for a Long Ramble. this is a precaution before ive even started typing i just know im gonna write a lot

i think before we start saying anything, we’ve got to acknowledge the difference between people who say that they dont like labels, and writing characters who Don’t Like Labels™. pointing out the problems of the latter is not a condemnation of the former. if someone rly doesnt feel like labeling their sexuality or gender, thats totally alright. the difference between these two is the person is a nuanced, multifaceted human being who may have lots of personal reasons for feeling that way, while the second is a fictional character that is Created and informed by cultural views of the creator. a person is not “created” by one single author and characters arent like…real living agents that have their Own Free Will, they are what their creators make of them. anyway i just feel like this is a rly important distinction that gets lost often!! i’m also more willing to look favorably on someone who self describes that way writing characters based on their own experiences, bc this perspective is inherently different from a straight person writing these sorts of characters. but moving on. 

whats also important to understand, beyond writing characters, is how being openly not straight is shunned. queer people are not allowed to Exist as openly queer and they have not been allowed historically. even these days among people who consider themselves progressive, you’ll often hear that “its alright if someone is gay but do they have to shove it in my face all the time.” this attitude isnt somehow formed in vacuum, but created in a society that treats been openly queer as a taboo. we aren’t allowed to be open about our sexualities the way straight people are. we can’t acknowledge that we’re queer lest someone tells us to Stop Shoving It In Their Face (not missing the irony as we’re surrounded by 400 billboards of hetero couples everywhere). i dont wan’t to delve into other aspects of discrimination and get too off track here, i just want to focus on how being Openly queer is treated as a taboo, particularly among people who still want to call themselves ‘accepting.’ the only way society allows queer people to exist is if they never remind anyone, Ever that they are not straight.

this is Integral to understanding why the i Don’t Like Labels characters are so frustrating. the unwillingness to Explicitly talk about queer people carries over quite handily to media. the same faux progressive people that demand queer people never talk about being queer bc its Too Much Information, will praise queer coded characters that hint at their sexuality but never confirm it. the reason these characters are written is not to genuinely explore why someone might feel uncomfortable with applying labels to themselves, but to appease people who will accept queerness as long as they never have to acknowledge it. this way, u can court queer people interested in representation And people who might like the story but will be uncomfortable with explicit queerness. its an attempt for writers to cash in on peoples desires for interesting queer characters without ever actually fully committing to representing them. you dont get to claim to support queer people if ur also out there providing comfort for peoples homophobia. you cant have a foot in both doors. 

describing queer experiences without calling them queer means that youre okay with this story as long as u dont acknowledge it as something Explicitly not straight and like…why?? why is it suddenly not okay when u take that bundle of experiences and use the word that theyre defining?? theres Weight behind using words like bi, gay, lesbian and if u reject them are u Really okay with lgbtq people? or are you okay with them Despite the fact that theyre lgbtq and not because you take into account theyre lgbtq. acceptance is not tolerating people Despite something, its acknowledging it and validating it as an okay thing to be. especially when it is something that historically Not been validated as okay. dismantling structural systems of queerphobia does not go about by ignoring queerphobia…shit this doesnt just fade away by chance, it takes active work. and part of this active work is Acknowledging Peoples Queerness As Something that is okay Out In The Open. the You in this isnt directed at you anon, just people who have these sentiments. 

throwing vague statements like ‘they just love who they love’ Also creates this level of ambiguity. you might say “well why do u need the certainty when ur describing what is at the very least, something obviously very not straight” and to that i say youd be fucking surprised at how goddamn hard straight people will try to erase the queerness out of a character. like i’m going to use a game called life is strange as a example. i’ll give some background: in the game, the main character max can romance both chloe and warren. note that max is not one of those blank state wholly customisable bioware-esque player characters, she has a personality outside of the choices u make. anyway, the conclusion that is Logically drawn from this is that she is most likely bisexual. or at the very least in some way, not straight. and Yet i have seen discussions that say “she doesnt have a set sexuality it just depends on the playthrough so shes not rly a Queer Character.” even more than that, ive seen people that saw “well even in the chloe one shes not necessarily gay or bi maybe shes just Making an Exception for chloe bc their relationship transcends sexuality” and like ??? Why??? why cant she just be bi?? even when given a queer romance, why do u try and interpret it in a way that sets her up as straight?? ive seen people say “its not a romance its just something that Transcends Words” as if this is… mutually exclusive from being a romance. like… Why doesnt this happen when hetero relationships are depicted?? ive literally never seen someone say “u know, maybe hes not attracted to women and just Making an Exception so hes not straight” why dont u see people try to erase the romance aspect out of hetero romances by claiming their relationship is “Beyond Words.” this treatment is 1000% only ever afforded to queer characters. this attempt to play off romance as not rly romantic is only done to queer characters, even if its done subconsciously. people will Refuse to accept a character is queer as fuck if you dodge around it, because heteronormativity is so ingrained in every interaction that even obviously queer characters get filtered through this lens. the problem with this isnt necessarily apparent until u look at it within historical context, where queer people are repeatedly not allowed to be openly queer. these arent isolated incidents, but manifestations of the idea that queer people shouldnt ever be open about their sexuality. youve got to tackle the discomfort that people have with words like gay/lesbian/bi/etc

i think this particular character trope wouldnt bother me so much if it wasnt like… the only narrative ever present. time and time again, i have to see characters proclaim that they dont like labels while never once even hearing people breathe the word bisexual. if it existed alongside characters who were explicitly queer it would be less frustrating But its literally one of the few ways (semi positive attempts at least) queer characters are ever portrayed. this is particularly true for bisexual characters lmao like… yes…theres people who dont like labels…but theres also millions of bi people that just wanna see a fucking bi character Talk about being bi and all we ever get is a vague “i dont like labels” (that is often never explored further than that and treated as a throwaway line anyway). is creating characters who say that a genuine attempt to characterize someones struggles with labels or is it just a way to avoid saying the word Bisexual.

same with queer romance in media. its only ever Okay if u just hint at it- see dumbledore being gay. see- the korrasami thing (though i dont fault the writers for this bc they pushed hard for what they got, its issues with the network). why are queer people relegated to drawn out stares that May imply something while straight characters are allowed to get into explicit relationships. when u create ambiguous characters that May be interpreted as straight (even if youve really gotta stretch) ur prefer to maintain the negative “neutral” of the heteronormative status quo and allow homophobes to live with their views unchallenged more than u care about addressing queerness in characters. 

 its not a coincidence that we dont do this to straight romance or straight characters. this is particularly important for queer kids!! its good to see queer characters out there being openly queer. while me and u can often pick up on queer themes and narratives, a 8 year old is not going to get that. especially when theyve been conditioned to see straight romance as the only feasible choice. they wont realize the character youre writing is gay or bi or whatever Because they havent been exposed to the connotations we associate w certain phrases. its so important for queer kids to see queer characters Owning that theyre queer. its especially importantly to normalize words like gay or bi or pan. being gay is often Extremely hypersexualized (which is why so many people will tell u they dont care what u do in the bedroom bc they can only picture queerness is a sexual context) so when u Dont treat these words as things only adults can say, u help get rid of the stigma surrounding them. u help remove the idea that being queer is inappropriate for kids to hear about and that the only possible aspect to being queer is sexual. 

anyway this has been Quite the Ramble but the point is that yes, we need to write more characters who are absolutely explicit about their sexuality and move away from the expectation that queer people need to create euphemisms to comfort homophobes desires to never hear about queerness.

[saladforchimps-blog]

My College Campus’s LGBT Community

Recently in my multicultural education class, we had a question and answer session with our campus’s LGBT community. Most of them looked exactly what you would expect them to look like: fat and ugly. Or visually repulsive, as I like to call them. If I saw any of these gargoyles on campus, I would immediately know that they’re gay, or whatever they identify as this week.  My gaydar is spot on. Not only are they fat, but they look like disgusting monsters, and none of them could ever create a friendship outside of their abnormal club. Now, I don’t hate gay people, and I support them to live their lives however they see fit. However, the LGBT community is full of radical queers who try to control everyone else, and they live in their own delusional world.

           When they first shuffled into the classroom, they all wrote their names and pronouns on the whiteboard. All of their pronouns were feminine. The lard asses, plus the semi-sexy half-dyke, then encouraged us to always tell people our preferred pronouns when we meet them. This is absolutely autistic for a number of reasons. First of all, trannies only make up around 0.3% of the total population; that means that 99.7% of the population identifies with the gender they were born with (dailycaller.com). So, policing 99.7% of the population’s language in order to never offended 0.3% of the population is completely absurd. I will refer to someone as a “he” if they’re male, or a “she” if they’re female, and will not first ask what their pronouns are upon meeting them. I will, however, use whatever pronouns someone would prefer me to refer to them as, I just won’t ask everyone I meet what pronouns they prefer.

They’ve changed the name of their community of freaks too. I don’t know if they did this themselves specifically on campus, or if the name just got longer everywhere. Apparently now, it’s: LGBTQAAP+2s. I shit you not, they fucking added 2s into it. 2s means two spirited, and its origins come from Native Americans; hundreds of years ago, or whatever, some Natives believed that they possessed the spirit of both a man and a woman. Basically, how they explained transgenderism back then. So, the buffet addicts of today added that into their long list of letters for some reason. Although, I highly doubt anyone in their toilet community identifies as 2s, or maybe all of them do just to be trendy.

           One of the cows was asexual. I refer to her as a cow because she was literally grazing during our class. Granted, she was only eating almonds and not a greasy cheeseburger, but still eating nonetheless. That’s something I’m still shocked by: that she literally had to stuff her fat gullet during an “informative” period. I was informed, informed about how much more mentally diseased these people are than I could have ever imagined. She also had an odd haircut that made her look extremely dyke. These people try to look like outcasts, and they’re doing a wonderful job. Probably the only wonderful job they’ve ever successfully accomplished. One of the biological girls said something about how she tries to stand out from most people and look gay. I can’t remember exactly what she said, I wasn’t paying that much attention to what she was saying, nor did I give a shit. So, they marginalize themselves, then get offended for being marginalized. And who’s always at fault? The straight white man. Fascists.

           The tranny, oh my fucking god, the tranny. Absolutely horrifying. My group’s social justice project is on sexism against men, and I could tell that they were triggered by the looks on their faces when we mentioned it to them. Two of my group members asked these things about their illogical opinions on our subject, and their answers were exactly what one would expect from people who should have been diagnosed with down syndrome. My group members said something about how men’s lives are considered less valuable than women’s and children’s because it’s women and children first in survival situations. The semi-sexy half-dyke’s answer was that men just think of women and children as weaker, and unable to take care of themselves. Women and children absolutely are weaker than men. Then, they tranny said that it was because of the patriarchy. No facts were brought up about the patriarchy, or given a proper explanation of what it is, it just simply is there is oppress women. Even though women clearly have the same rights as men do, at least in Western countries.

           I didn’t enjoy sitting in a room with them at all. I had a slight headache, and the semi-sexy half-dyke was wearing some strong perfume that smelled like ass, and it made me feel even worse. I forgot to mention that the semi-sexy half-dyke isn’t fat, I’m not attracted to the obese. So, not only were these people visually unappealing, but they: sounded like shit, smelled like shit, and didn’t have properly functioning brains. They were unappealing to three of the five senses, and had a 75% obesity rate. Ok, maybe not all of them were technically obese, but they were still pig people. Still, they portrayed an accurate representation of the lesbian obesity crisis. A study conducted by the National Institutes of Health found that 75% of lesbians are overweight (washingtonpost.com). That’s 25% higher than straight women, and double the blubber rate for gay men. So, lesbians are just really fat people, generally speaking. There are some hot lesbians, who have their waistlines under control.

           Now, allow me to critique the bisexual bitch (the semi-sexy half-dyke). Immediate when she walked in, I thought that she must be, and was hoping, that she was bi. Correct again; my gaydar is never wrong. She talked about how she hates it when straight boys ask her if she likes threesomes. Then, my professional victim professor had to single me out, and then my entire table because I admitted to the class that it’s hot when two lesbians are making out. Let me be clearer, this week we were learning about homophobia, and he wanted to know if the guys in the class were attracted to lesbians. Nobody was answering this obvious question, so he called on our table because it was made up entirely of men; my response was “it depends”. If two girls are attractive and kissing, that most certainly is a sexy sight. Although, not all lesbians are created equal, some, most of them, are way too fat to be considered attractive by heterosexual men. (Again, look for the link in my sources if you need further convincing). She should take it was a compliment that so many guys ask her that. It means guys think that she’s a hot lesbian. If she wasn’t, nobody would even be talking to her in the first place, let alone ask her about her sex life. Besides, the closest thing most lesbians get toward sex is KFC. That reminds me of what the cow said, in a desperate attempt to try to be funny that failed miserably, “who needs sex when there’s cake”. Fat logic is evident with that one. She probably has sex with cake. I don’t have any evidence to back up that claim, but it’s my non-obese gut feeling.

           Another odd thing these sub humans do, as if they could get any weirder, is snapping their fingers. In an attempt to keep our classroom a “safe space”, they snap their fingers when they disagree with each other, I believe. Randomly when one of the dykes was talking, another one would snap their fingers, and nobody would say or do anything about it. It was so weird.

So, the LBGT community is full of: fat, ugly, stupid, ignorant, perpetual victims, and conspiracy theorists. Nobody should take them seriously, and they should all just fuck off.

Sources:

Hicks, Josh. "Why the federal government spent $3 million to study lesbian obesity." The Washington Post. WP Company, 02 Sept. 2014. Web. 04 Apr. 2017.

"Exactly Zero Point Three Percent Of Americans Are Transgender." The Daily Caller. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 Apr. 2017.

[colorisbyshe]

"Why are asexuals never mentioned in LGBT history?" Because the word asexual didn't exist before the 2000s. Asexual people existed but were called other things. "Yeah, they were called LBGT or straight!" Bisexuals accepted anyone who felt the same kind of attraction to everyone, even no attraction. "30 year olds say aces were in the community, why should i care?" First-hand experience counts. And it seems your argument implies you'd believe older (40+) LGBTs saying this same info. Would you?"

But it did? Asexual absolutely did exist before the 2000s. Like, y’all made sure everyone knows that asexual as a word existed before the 2000s. Kinsey made it semi popular way before then. Asexual became mainstream in the 2000s but existed before then. See? This is why I don’t fucking trust ahistorical claims on the internet because y’all always get some other info blatantly wrong as well lmao.

And, again, show me where bisexual was defined as attraction to everyone and no one?? Because literally the only post claiming that has been debunked. And also like??? Can you pinpoint when this was happening? Give me what years. WHat region was this happening? Because I doubt every group every just decided “yeah bi means attraction to EVERYONE or... no one too” when people hardly recognize that bisexual doesn’t mean “attraction to both genders” in the year 2017. Come on, buck up, show me where the fuck bisexual ever meant “yeah I’ll date/fuck multiple genders or nah I won’t do any of that.”

Show me you’re not taking advantage of the fact that people deliberately tried to erase bi history and show me literally any scrap of evidence that isn’t someone intentionally misreading. Show me where cishets who didn’t feel sexual attraction were called bi. Come on now.

I wouldn’t believe literally anyone on the internet who has no way of proving their identity or age who comes to me with not a SINGLE scrap of evidence ANYWHERE claiming to know a piece of LGBT history that no one else seems to remember. I have exactly zero reason to believe people who won’t even show their face when they say these sort of things. Because people absolutely do take advantage of the fact that our history literally died with so many people and that disgusts me.