#sartin

[roughridingrednecks]

Sartin

[bob--and--friends]

Penelope

@fieryfemale

[pairs-studio]

[perezhilton]

Jesse Sartin is about to spend a long time in prison!

[denastudio]

Pillows by Rowena Sartin

[dont-look-me-in-the-eye]

the only reason i'm venting on Ma Blog is bc my fucking discord is broke and i can't talk to my partner like this so! you all get to see inside a fucked-up teenager's brain today

[medusa-my-beloved]

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Dylan Sartin🔱 (@dylantattooart)

Dylan Sartin

[rusharound]

IT’S FINALLY HERE! THE SIGMA ACAPELLA PROSHOT HAS ARRIVED!

When a non-descript University’s development plans involve the destruction of all “degenerate" and "unnecessary” clubs and societies, one Frat-star and his house of "Himbos" must team up with a "Theater Dad" and his underdog squad of the theatre department in order to save their home.

And maybe experience a little romance and kisses and whatever too. >>

Written and Produced by Annahis Basmadjian

Co-produced, Musical Direction, Associate Composition, Music and Lyrics, and Mix by Samuel Gillmore

Directed by Kate Ely

Choreographed by Selene Dublanko

Stage Managed by Emily Hoff

Associate Musical Direction by Florence Reiher

Composed by Sebastian Ochoa Mendoza

Filmography and Editing by Robert Hunt

Art by Oliver Love (@doorstoplord)

Featuring the talents of:

Nathan Mannion (Ray Rhiner)

Blake Sartin (Oliver Keaton)

Hailey Fowler (Veronica Mathers)

Katrina Teitz (Xena Zacharian)

Justin Low (Tyler)

James Penco (Chad/Brad)

Jared White (Josh)

Juliana de Medeiros (Hazel)

Sam Fraser (Westley Azuish)

Ken Tynan (Dean Guy)

Julia Halabourda (Barbara)

Garth Phillips (Adam)

Stacy Albrecht (Stacy Dawson)

Nicole Eves (Sierra Dawson)

Heller (Mayor John)

ENSEMBLE:

Kiefer Seeley, Kseniya Yemelyanova, Holly Krauchi, Viviana Renteria, Zoe Soupidis, Berfin Yildiz, Yasamin Isfahani

[acoffeeplease]

Michele Sartin

[kazuma-asogi-blog]

Shrewd Simon Short sewed shoes. Seventeen summers, speeding storms, spreading sunshine successively, saw Simon’s small, shabby shop, still standing staunch, saw Simon’s selfsame squeaking sign still swinging silently specifying: Simon Short, Smithfield’s sole surviving shoemaker. Shoes sewed soles super finely.

Simon’s spry, sedulous spouse, Sally Short, sewed shirts, stitched sheets, stuffed sofas. Simon’s six stout sons — Seth, Samuel, Stephen, Saul, Silas, Shadrach – sold sundries. Sober Seth sold sugar, spices; simple Sam sold saddles, stirrups, screws; sagacious Stephen sold silks, satins, shawls; sceptical Saul sold silver salvers; selfish Shadrach sold salves, shoestrings, stops, saws, skates; slack Silas sold Sally Short’s stuffed sofas.

Some seven summers since, Simon’s second son Samuel saw Sophia Sophronia Spriggs somewhere. Sweet, smart, sensible Sophia Sophronia Spriggs. Sam soon showed strong symptoms. Sam seldom stayed storing, selling saddles. Sam sighed sorrowfully, sought Sophia Sophronia’s society, sang several serenades slyly. Simon stormed, scolded severely, said Sam seemed so silly singing such shameful, senseless songs. ‘Strange Sam should slight such splendid sales! Strutting spendthrift! Shattered-brained simpleton.’

‘Softly, softly, sire,’ said Sally. ‘Sam’s smitten; Sam’s spied some sweetheart.’

‘Sentimental schoolboy!’ snarled Simon. ‘Smitten! Stop such stuff.’ Simon sent Sally’s snuffbox spinning, seized Sally’s scissors, smashed Sally’s spectacles, scattering several spools. ‘Sneaking scoundrel! Sam’s shocking silliness shall surcease!’ Scowling, Simon stopped speaking, started swiftly shopward.

Sally sighed sadly. Summoning Sam, she spoke sweet sympathy. ‘Sam,’ said she, ‘Sire seems singularly snappy; so, solicit, sue, secure Sophronia speedily, Sam.’

‘So soon? So soon?’ said Sam, standing stock-still.

‘So soon, surely,’ said Sally, smiling, ‘specially since Sire shows such spirits.’

So Sam, somewhat scared, sauntered slowly. Shaking stupendously, Sam soliloquised: ‘Sophia Sophronia Spriggs, Spriggs — Short — Sophia Sophronia Short-Samuel Short’s spouse — sounds splendid! Suppose she should say — she shan’t — she shan’t!’

Soon Sam spied Sophia starching shirts, singing softly. Seeing Sam she stopped starching, saluting Sam smilingly. Sam stammered shockingly. ‘Spl-spl-splendid summer season, Sophia.’

‘Selling saddles still, Sam?’

‘Sar-sar-tin,’ said Sam, starting suddenly. ‘Season’s somewhat sudoriflc,’ said Sam, steadily, staunching streaming sweat, shaking sensibly.

‘Sartin,’ said Sophia, smiling significantly. ‘Sip some sweet sherbet, Sam.’ (Silence: sixty seconds.) ‘Sire shot sixty sheldrakes, Saturday,’ said Sophia.

‘Sixty? Shoot!’ said Sam. (Silence: seventy-seven seconds.)

‘See sister Susan’s sunflowers,’ said Sophia, socially, silencing such stiff silence.

Sophia’s sprightly sauciness stimulated Sam strangely; so Sam suddenly spoke sentimentally: ‘Sophia, Susan’s sunflowers seem saying Samuel Short, Sophia Sophronia Spriggs stroll serenely, seek some sequestered spot, some sylvan shade. Sparkling springs shall sing soul stirring strains; sweet songsters shall silence secret sighings; super-angelic sylphs shall —’

Sophia snickered; so Sam stopped. ‘Sophia,’ said Sam, solemnly. ‘Sam,’ said Sophia.

‘Sophia, stop smiling; Sam Short’s sincere. Sam’s seeking some sweet spouse, Sophia.’

Sophia stood silent.

‘Speak, Sophia, speak; such suspense speculates sorrow.’ ‘Seek, sire, Sam, seek sire.’

So Sam sought sire Spriggs. Sire Spriggs said, ‘Sartin.’

(I did not write this I googled long tongue twisters)

I'm not reading all that. My apologies, I...

Wait a minute, you were the one to sic van Zieks on me the other day, weren't you?

I see. You're making fun of me. Well. What if I were to assert that I just spoke aloud your entire message perfectly? If you want to claim I'm lying, the burden of proof is on you, my learned friend. I'd like to see what sort of evidence you can conjure up to the contrary.

Or you could give up and acknowledge my superior elocution.

[nesiacha]

Relations Between Gracchus Babeuf and Jean-Paul Marat

After relaying Babeuf's opinion of Napoleon here https://www.tumblr.com/nesiacha/767626191447392256/the-journey-of-the-forgotten-french-revolutionary?source=share

It seemed important to me, after having mentioned Albertine Marat, to say what relationships and opinions Jean-Paul Marat and Gracchus Babeuf may have had.

Gracchus Babeuf and Jean-Paul Marat had a rather complex relationship. In fact, Gracchus Babeuf was arrested in 1790 for, as he stated, “having supported that the French, being free, could sow motions in the streets and tobacco in the fields. He was taken from his bed in the night by an armed squad with the secrecy and violence once used by Sartine and Le Noir; and he was dragged from Roye to Paris, where he was incarcerated under an order from the Court of Aids, combined with the Committee of Searches” (National and Political Journal, directed by Salomon [his real name: Antoine de Rivarol, 1743-1801] and before him by Antoine Sabatier de Castres, No. 3, Cambrai, July 1790). He wrote to Marat to inform him of his conditions of detention, arbitrary decisions, and Marat published his correspondence with Babeuf: "These unfortunate individuals were each thrown into a separate dungeon, where they were shackled, and all imaginable precautions were taken to prevent any communication. What are they accused of? Who issued the orders? Why were short-coated horsemen used instead of the National Guard? Why these barbaric precautions, these violations of the home in the dark of night, to drag the poor from their sleep, who appeared to be living without reproach and peacefully in their families? Who could have caused this alarm, fear, and pain? Why this gloomy, dark, frightening procession? Why these chains, these black cells? Why this sequestration of each prisoner, of the rest of the living? Why, why, why? … Important questions raised by these alarming acts of despotism and barbarism, to which every good citizen awaits an answer.” (Babeuf, in L'Ami du Peuple, No. 138, June 19, 1790). Historian Jean Marc Schiappa claims that Marat continued to support Babeuf’s release.

However, there were differences in their opinions, and at times, they harshly criticized each other. An example is the "Joly affair", one of the secretaries of the municipality (unfortunately, I was unable to access the full document due to technical issues, but I will send you the link). They also disagreed in their critiques of Necker, despite both being opposed to him. Marat accused Necker, according to Babeuf's correspondence, of having “sought to restore the chains of despotism to the King, having ceased to appear as the defender of the People at the very moment when his enthusiasm had rehabilitated him; of having cowardly abandoned, in order to solicit clemency for the traitors to the Homeland, the blind trust of this devoted People whose loud demands had brought him back from exile. He had even gone so far as to lead the vile monopolizers, and barbarically tried to make the People perish from hunger.” Babeuf responded, saying: "If Mr. Marat’s grievances were valid, if he could prove what he claims, if while France believed him to be the virtuous Minister and the honest man par excellence, he had the talent to discern a traitor cloaked in the mantle of hypocrisy, and was capable of clearly exposing his black deeds and criminal machinations, his denunciation would become an act of courage and true patriotism, for which the Nation would owe him eternal gratitude. But if this act is merely a slanderous attack aimed at sowing distrust towards an administrator who has become the idol of the Kingdom, such an offense cannot be punished too harshly. Mr. Marat will need strong evidence to justify his accusations when the feelings inspired by the person he accuses are such that the French would hesitate to believe he could do harm, as though they saw him committing it. It will not be with epithets like 'foolishly adored minister,' 'ambitious intriguer,' or 'knight of industry,' and other similar terms that he can make an impression; but with the evidence, which prudence requires always to support anyone who dares to act as a denouncer." Moreover, while Marat constantly attacked Necker, he was also opposed to the maximum and the establishment of stable prices in February 1793, according to Daline (a policy favored by the Hébertists, close to Babeuf, such as Chaumette), while Babeuf, according to Daline's excerpt, believed that the only way to solve the supply difficulties was "taxation," the establishment of stable prices. In his correspondence, he wrote: “Until we come to more decisive taxation, we will always be at risk of shortages, and no committee of provisions will stop us from suffering hunger.” The unfinished manuscript also contains interesting observations by Babeuf about the grain market of Santerre in Picardy, France, as he tried to understand why the grain coming from there to Paris was not reaching the capital.

But in 1793, a kind of rupture occurred between Babeuf and Marat. Mathiez claims it was an act of ingratitude on Babeuf's part toward Marat, but Victor Daline sees it differently. It is important to also understand the private context of Babeuf’s life: his wife Marie-Anne Babeuf , who was his political right-hand (a fervent political activist in her own right), had to give up part of their family credit to pay off creditors, even though they had three children (their daughter Sophie would die of famine two years later in February 1795, to their great sorrow). They were helped by a friend of theirs, Claude Fournier, known as "the American" (another revolutionary figure at the time). In a pamphlet, C. Fournier (the American) wrote to Marat: "Marat, you are not the Friend of the People. True friends of the People do not lightly denounce the best patriots. (…) If you are truly the Friend of the People, if you are truly of that unfortunate portion that has done everything and for whom nothing has yet been done for four years, to whom it seems that no one has even thought of helping, be constantly in the tribune, make it a permanent station, and do not leave until you have achieved what Duchosal and Tallien, friends of the sans-culottes, have dared to ask: THE COMFORT OF THE INDIGENT CLASS, etc..." Dommanget points to a contradiction between Babeuf’s praise of Marat and his attack on him. But let us not forget that Babeuf believed that friendship should not spare criticism. As for his critique of Tallien, he was forced to show that Marat was right in my opinion to present Tallien as “a greedy intriguer seeking positions” (Manceron, 1989). According to Eric Walter, later, Babeuf would break with Tallien, seeing him for what he really was, starting in December 1794. He attacked the world of the Directory in his Tribune du Peuple journal, calling it “fakery” and “mercantile,” and the “empire of the frisure” and the “legislation of the wig” (No. 28). He then attacked Theresia Tallien as a “Messalina,” a “Pompadour,” an “Antoinette,” and other “Venus-Dubarry,” while addressing his fellow citizens: “Frenchmen, you have returned under the reign of the courtesans” (No. 29). (This is quite sexist on Babeuf's part, and I say this while not liking Theresia Tallien at all, but he would have done better to attack her on political grounds, where there was so much to criticize, even if the fact that he saw his daughter slowly starving to death while these people lived in corruption without being able to do anything about it may have fueled his anger. This is clearly not his finest moment, which is an understatement). When Marat was alive, he would speak of "creating a great scandal" in such situations, while Babeuf says he will break windows, “the Tribune of the People here breaks the windows and releases all the important truths” (No. 29).

However, Daline explains that while Babeuf was harsh in his critiques, it did not prevent him from having friendship or admiration for those he truly admired; he just expressed his opinion clearly, even if it was unpleasant for the person he considered a friend. At times, Marat was right about Tallien, while other times it was Babeuf who sought to see beyond Necker's record. Moreover, Babeuf, who received a warm welcome in Picardy, liked the nickname "Marat of Picardy" and was popular there.

Babeuf also had political ties with Simone Evrard and especially Albertine Marat. When Guffroy, his former ally (with whom he would sever ties, much like Fouché), betrayed him, Babeuf, in his own words, “went to the refuge of the family of the Friend of the People. I felt the involuntary movement that pushed me in my distress towards the sanctuary of liberty. I told the widow and sister of Marat what had just happened to the one who had tried to follow in his footsteps.” Albertine Marat would form political ties with Gracchus Babeuf. Albertine Marat was a subscriber to Le Tribun du Peuple, and it was Babeuf who published her letter against Fréron. Babeuf would say of Albertine Marat, "The sister of the Friend of the People has taken a truly wise course: it is good, it is useful that one should follow her..." He also paid tribute to all mothers who “dedicate their entire days to prevent us from starving” and said of them, “But beware, women, whom we have degraded, without whom, however, and without their courage on the 5th and 6th of October, we might not have had freedom!”

Sources:

Eric Walter

Jean-Marc Schiappa

Victor Daline

https://www.jstor.org/stable/41926004?read-now=1&seq=20#page_scan_tab_contents

[fundeadasylum]

Terminus Project ref sheets I made for Art Fight! I am so!!! Very happy with how these guys turned out!! Especially Khris, Darrius, and Fayte! I struggle with drawing creatures/animals but I tried really hard and I'm really, really happy with them!

These characters have been with me for well over a decade and though they've gone through many, many iterations and changes, they are still very near and dear to me. I love them very much and I hope one day I have the confidence to finish and share their story. <3

Khris / Lord Darrius / Fayte / Sartin / Ivory / Saeth

[anotherhumaninthisworld]

Is there evidence or do we know if it was considered common knowledge during his lifetime that Danton was a “womanizer” or frequently cheated on his wife? I’m just wondering how much that was a modern or even Thermidorian invention. Thanks!

I personally only know of two instances of Danton cheating (or perhaps attempting to cheat would be a more fitting description, since he was rejected in both cases) on his wife. One took place in 1793 and was reported in the memoirs of Élisabeth Lebas. 

One day, among others, [Madame Panis] took me to Sèvres, to a country house inhabited by Danton. I had never seen him; but great God! How ugly he was! We found him with a lot of people, walking in a very beautiful garden. He came to us and asked Mme Panis who I was; she replied that I was one of Robespierre’s host’s daughters. He told her I appeared to be suffering, that I needed a good friend, that this would return me to health. He had the sort of repulsive features that frighten one. He came up to me, wanted to take my waist and kiss me (m’embrasser). I repulsed him forcefully, though I was still quite weak. I was very young; but his face scared me so much that I pleaded insistently with Mme Panis not to bring me back to that house; I told her that this man had said horrible things to me, such as I had never heard. He had no respect for women, and still less for young people. Madame Panis seemed to regret having taken me to that house and told me that she did not know that man under that report; she assured me that we would not return to his house and then told me that he was Danton; she urged me not to speak to my mother of what had happened, because it could cause her pain, and she would no longer want to let me come to see her. I admit that this recommendation was not pleasing to me, for our good mother had raised us in the habit of never hiding anything from her.

The second report comes from Lucile Desmoulins, who in a diary entry from December 12 1792 writes that Danton at some point in the fall had started making some kind of moves on her, but that she eventually got him to stop:

After eight days D(anton) went to stay at the Chabcellerie, madame R(obert) and I went there in our turn. I really liked it there, but only one thing bothered me, it was Fréron. Every day I saw new progress and didn't know what to do about it. I consulted Maman, she approved of my plan to banter and joke about it, and that was the wisest thing to do. Because what to do? Forbid him to come? He and C(amille) dealt with each other every day, we would meet. To tell him to be more circumspect was to confess that I knew everything and that I did not disapprove of him; an explanation would have been needed. I therefore thought myself very prudent to receive him with friendship and reserve as usual, and I see now that I have done well. Soon he left to go on a mission. I was very happy with it, I thought it would change him. But many other cares to be taken… I realized that D(anton)… Oh, of that one, I was suspicious! I had to fear the eyes of his wife with whom I did not want to become an enemy. I did so well that the former did not realize that I had noticed it, and the latter that it might be happening.

Other than that, I’ve found the following four pieces, which, while not involving any cheating, does paint Danton as a kind of womanizer. The first is an anecdote from the memoirs of the Sainte-Amaranthe family:

”They are graver in there than we are,” observed M. de Morand , pointing to the room where the Dantonist party was. We left our room to go to the Français. Pamela was acted. Some moments after our entrance a box opposite to us was opened. ”There is Danton,” cried M. de Pressac. ”He pursues us,” added Madame de Sainte-Amaranthe. Between the acts the fancy took her to look at him closer. ”Will you come with me, dear?” she said to me. ”The box next to his is vacant. Let us go there. Will you come, Amélie?” ”Oh! I shall remain here,” replied M. de Sartines; ”when I want to see wild beasts , I can go to the Jardin du Roi.” M. de Pressac came with us; he assured us, laughing, that Danton would be flattered if he knew the reason of our moving. ”Yes,” replied my companion , he will think he has rallied all parties round him when he sees a royalist and a Girondin hovering about him.” Having stayed half through an act in Danton's neighbourhood, she said to me: ”I have had enough; have you?” ”I have had too much,” I answered. Turning to our companion, she said aloud: ”Our first box was decidedly better; let us go back to it.” These words were intended to remove any idea of our appearance near Danton being intentional, for he and his friends had naturally looked at two well-dressed women. This, I swear, is the only connexion which ever existed between the family of Sainte-Amaranthe and Danton; they dined on the same day at Rose's restaurant, in totally separate rooms.

In the notes the jury member Topino-Lebrun left of the dantonist trial, we also find the following passage:

Danton, in the chamber of the accused — Me a conspirator? I b(aise) (kiss, fuck, caress etc) my wife every day. My name is attached to all the revolutionary institutions: the levy, the revolutionary army, the revolutionary committee, and I am a moderate!

Then there’s the following notes written by Robespierre in 1794:

When I showed to Danton the system of calumny of Roland and of the Brissotins, promoted in all the public writings, Danton answered me: “What do I care! Public opinion is a whore, posterity is a folly!” 

The word virtue made Danton laugh; he didn’t have a more solid virtue, he said jokingly, than the one which he practised every night with his wife. How could a man, to whom every idea of morality was foreign, be the defender of liberty?

And finally, on January 22 1792, Lucile similarily writes in her diary: ”[Danton’s] jokes are as boorish (rustres) as he is. Despite this, he is a good devil.”

Given these statements, it would appear Danton was at least known for cracking sexual jokes to contemporaries. If he was a notorious cheater is however a claim I had less luck finding sources for, as had Hillaire Beloc who in his Danton (1899) wrote that there exists absolutely no evidence for the idea:

As to his private life, affection dominated him. Upon the faith of some who did not know him he acquired the character of a debauchee. For the support of this view there is not a tittle of direct evidence. He certainly loved those pleasures of the senses which Robespierre refused, and which Roland was unable to enjoy; but that his good dinners were orgies or of any illegitimate loves (once he had married the woman to whom he was so devotedly attached) there is no shadow of proof.

I think the question certainly deserves to be investigated, given the fact that the idea is actually quite a common one. On Gabrielle Danton’s wikipedia there even is to read that her husband begged her corpse for forgiveness for his many love affairs after digging it up… Would be interesting to learn how much of all this is fiction and how much is fact.

[all-things-are-nothing-to-me]

2022 - Masho Amini

1874 - Ricardo Flores Magon (left).

1920 - The Wall Street Bombing. Most people think it was carried out by the Italian anarchist & Galleanist, Mario Buda.

Galleanists were supporters of the Insurrectionary Italian anarchist, Luigi Galleani.

You can actually go visit the site of the bombing as the bank still has shrapnel damage to this day.

1923 - Ōsugi Sakae

& Itō Noe

[cheatsykoopa98]

"this is cinema" - Sartin Morcese on the Dad AU

chis is tinema*

[ferrralit]

Rowena Sartin 3 Layer Pillow — iko iko