#royal migration advisory consult | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

felipeandletizia · 4 years ago

Photo

May 25, 2020: King Felipe and Queen Letizia attended a meeting of international experts to analyze the situation caused by the world health crisis in different continents. In the whole of Europe and also in Asia, Africa and America.

The King and Queen, accompanied by the Minister of Science and Innovation, Pedro Duque, have met, at the headquarters of the Elcano Royal Institute, with the president and director of the institution, Emilio Lamo de Espinosa and Charles Powell, who have made a first presentation on the impact of the pandemic, globally and in Spain.

Next, they attended an analysis session on the effects of COVID19 in the world, in which four members of the Scientific Committee of the Elcano Royal Institute, experts in different geopolitical areas, participated by videoconference:

Analysis of the situation in China and the rest of Asia, by Alicia García Herrero. Associate senior researcher at the Elcano Royal Institute, chief Asia-Pacific economist at NATIXIS, senior fellow at Bruegel and currently an adjunct professor at City University of Hong Kong. Analysis of the situation in America, by Moisés Naím Senior associate of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace International Economics Program. Analysis of the situation in Africa, by Ibrahim Mayaki. Executive Director of the African Union Development Agency (AUDA-NEPAD) Analysis of the situation in Europe, by Nathalie Tocci. Director of the Affari Internazionali Institute (IAI).

The Scientific Council is the consultative body of the Royal Elcano Institute, made up of prominent Spanish and foreign personalities, with proven knowledge of international relations.

The Council, which meets in person once a year, was convened for this month of May, but has had to be postponed until autumn due to the health crisis.

The Real Instituto Elcano is the “think-tank” of international and strategic studies, carried out from a Spanish, European and global perspective.

Its objective is to promote in society the knowledge of the international reality and the foreign relations of Spain, as well as to serve as a focus of thought and generation of ideas that are useful for decision-making by political decision-makers, leaders of private companies and public institutions, social and academic agents.

All of this, with the aim of constituting a forum for meeting and fostering consensus, within a framework of defense of democracy, multilateralism, the social market economy, freedom and human rights.

Created in 2001 as a private foundation, the organizational structure of the Elcano Royal Institute balances public and private interests and favors the exchange of ideas in a plural and independent environment, accommodating diverse political and social sensibilities.

The highest governing body is its Board of Trustees, under the honorary presidency of HM the King. It also has a Business Advisory Council, an Executive Commission, a Scientific Committee and a set of collaborating entities.

The institute's work is reflected in publications and reports of various kinds, freely available on the web and the blog. Added to this is the convening of working groups, seminars and conferences. To guarantee its projection and influence abroad, it participates in numerous international networks and projects.

The work of the Elcano Royal Institute is articulated in thematic and geographic axes. The former include, among others, energy and climate change, security and defense, the global economy, international terrorism, the image of Spain, and demography and migration. With special emphasis on Europe, the Atlantic area, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, and North Africa and the Middle East. To do this, it has a stable and multidisciplinary team of highly qualified researchers, as well as a wide network of associated experts, and the participation of leading figures in Spanish life linked to foreign policy and defense, the economic and business fabric, the Public Administration and the academic, cultural and social sectors. It is chaired by Emilio Lamo de Espinosa and directed by Charles Powell.

The last time Don Felipe visited the headquarters of the Elcano Royal Institute was on June 18, 2014, 24 hours before his proclamation as King of Spain.

The Royal Elcano Institute takes its name from Juan Sebastián Elcano, a Spanish sailor who led the first circumnavigation of the world, of which the V Centennial is now celebrated.

#King Felipe #Queen Letizia #King Felipe of Spain #Queen Letizia of Spain #King Felipe VI #King Felipe VI of Spain #Official Event #COVID-19 #May 2020

1 note · View note

royalmigrationdubai · 5 years ago

Video

youtube

Royal migration solutions Dubai: Latest Business immigration Categories

#royal-migration-solutions #Royal-Migration #royal-migration-dubai #business-immigration #business-class #pnp visa #royal migration advisory consult

0 notes

onlinevideoproduction · 6 years ago

Text

Talk: Border Politics and Policy in Today's Europe

As part of a two-day programme on migration and border politics in Europe, Virginie Guiraudon (PhD, 1997, Harvard) delivers this keynote address followed by a discussion with Professor Christina Boswell. If tonight's talk interests you, we invite you to attend the research seminar taking place at the Institut français d'Ecosse on Friday, 30 November.

Summary:

Since 2015, migration has become high politics and topped the agenda of EU summits, exacerbated tensions between member states and is considered to be emblematic of the "crisis of Europe". In the UK, the 2016 referendum also focused on migrants although the UK was never a member of Schengen and has shifted its land and maritime border in Northern France since the 2003 Touquet agreement.

These debates are often framed in Manichean terms: bona fide refugees vs. "economic migrants," security vs. humanitarian concerns, identity politics vs utilitarian logics. Yet it may be important to analyse EU border policy in medias res. How does it work (or not)? Who is really in charge? One entry point to answer this question is the study of the actual sites where migrants are on hold, in the big European waiting room: "hotspots" in Italy and Greece, and encampments near borders such as Calais.

About the Speakers:

Virginie Guiraudon (PhD, 1997, Harvard) is CNRS Director of Research at the Sciences Po Centre for European Studies and Comparative Politics in Paris. She studies EU policy processes, in particular the emergence of an EU immigration, asylum, external borders policy domain as well as EU antidiscrimination laws. She is the recipient of the 2013 Mattei Dogan prize in European Political Sociology and coedited the volume Europe's Prolonged Crisis. The making and Unmaking of a Political Union (Palgrave, 2015). In June 2018, with several hundred colleagues, she launched a call for an International Panel on Migration and Asylum.

Christina Boswell is Professor of Politics and Dean of Research at the University of Edinburgh. Her research explores the role of knowledge in public policy, and comparative UK and European immigration policies. She has recently published Manufacturing Political Trust: Targets and Performance Measurement in Public Policy (Cambridge University Press, 2012). Christina has provided consultancy and policy advice to various international organisations and government departments and currently chairs the Scottish Government's Expert Advisory Group on Migration and Population, and the Royal Society of Edinburgh's Working Group on Immigration and Diversity.

Event details:

Border Politics and Policy in Today's Europe Thursday, 29 November 2018, 6.45 - 8.15pm Talk in ENGLISH | FREE

Institut français d'Ecosse West Parliament Square Edinburgh EH1 1RF

Advanced booking recommended ONLINE via our extranet, at 0131 285 60 30, or at info ifecosse.org.uk

This event is delivered by the Embassy of France in London, the Institut français d'Ecosse, and the University of Edinburgh as part of the Embassy's seminar series The Fabric of Citizenship.

Image: Le radeau de la Méduse Credit: Théodore Géricault, 1818

from Institut Français Écosse http://www.ifecosse.org.uk/Talk-Border-Politics-and-Policy-in.html via IFTTT

#showreel media #media production company #business media specialists #media specialists company

0 notes

angrycollectordaze-me-blog · 6 years ago

Text

Paper代写：British parliamentary system

本篇paper代写- British parliamentary system讨论了英国议会制度。英国议会制度可以追溯到13世纪，迄今已有近800多年的历史。发展到现在，英国议会制度已经改革了很多次，促使着英国的议会制度走向进一步的成熟和完善。尽管英国议会在实际活动中受到许多人的批评，但是从历史和长远看，我们仍然能够发现英国议会活动的高效率，从而保证了国家的稳定和发展。本篇paper代写由51due代写平台整理，供大家参考阅读。

The early parliament was a way for the emerging social class to try to share power, just as the king's advisory body, which gradually evolved into one of the three powers of the country's public power separation and balance. The modern parliament is a legislature of a sovereign state or region whose members are known as "parliamentarians". Members can be directly or indirectly elected or appointed. In general, parliament has the power to sign diplomatic treaties, declare war or ratify peace talks, elect or overthrow the government, and approve government budgets in addition to legislation. In some countries parliament and the power to elect a head of state are the means by which parliamentarians exercise democratic rights on behalf of citizens. The United Kingdom is the initiator of the parliamentary system. As a thing of universal social, political and economic value, the parliamentary system has been recognized, adopted and learned by most countries in the modern world, and has become one of the modern ways of exercising democratic rights. Therefore, the British parliamentary system is called the "mother of parliament".

The British parliamentary system dates back to the 13th century and has a history of nearly 800 years. In 1258, king Henry's intervention in the Italian war, regardless of the crop failure and famine, asked the aristocrats to pay one-third of their income for military expenditure, which aroused the aristocrats' dissatisfaction. King Henry iii's cousin and brother-in-law, Simon? DE? Baron DE montfort led armed soldiers into the palace, forcing Henry to agree to a meeting to sign the Oxford ordinance, which limited the crown. According to the Oxford ordinance, the power of the state is in the hands of a council of 15 men controlled by the aristocracy. A new special term "Parliament" was introduced. The word comes from French and means "consultation", and later in English means parliament. The Oxford ordinance states that the king shall not make any decision without the consent of the council. During the reign of Henry iii, the assembly attended by the monastic and secular aristocracy became the name of parliament, but the king was not willing to lose power and often provoked trouble. In 1264, with the support of the nobles, knights and citizens, DE montfort fought and captured the king. In January 1265, DE montfort, in the name of the regent, convened a meeting under the magna carta of liberty, known as the great conference. Thus began the rudiments of the British parliament. As the representative body of the feudal aristocracy, the grand council consisted of five earls and 17 barons, two more knights and a few lower priests in each county, and citizens were represented in several large cities. However, the parliament at that time could not be equated with the modern parliament.

In 1295, king Edward I summoned a parliament, history says the "model parliament", Kings, nobles, knights and affluent urban citizens political coalition formation, besides big nobility and priest, this session of parliament is fixed to send two knights from each county on behalf of, each two citizen representatives to participate in the big cities, and therefore "grand meeting" a step forward. As the knight and citizen representatives are closely related to each other in fundamental interests and have more common topics, they often gather together to exchange information and discuss countermeasures when such a parliament is held. From 1343, they began to meet alone in Westminster Abbey, gradually forming a house of Commons. Nobles and church elders also form the house of lords. The British bicameral system originated from this. But neither the model parliament, nor the parliament of both houses in 1343, is the modern parliament of universal suffrage.

In 1297, parliament obtained the power to approve taxation. By the 14th century, parliament had gained the power to enact laws. Parliament is also the highest arbiter of political affairs and especially of malfeasance committed by the king's ministers. The formation of the parliament made the king's feudal advisory body gradually become the representative body of the state. The participation of city representatives and the formation of the house of Commons are of great significance to the future development of British history. The rising class of citizens united with the lower nobles, using the power of parliament to approve taxes and pass bills, to limit the power of the crown.

In the early years of the Tudor dynasty, the despot strengthened the role of parliament to some extent. The social foundation of the tudors was the new aristocracy and the new urban bourgeoisie, and the alliance of the crown with these new bourgeoisie and the new bourgeoisie was strengthened by the house of Commons, composed of the middle aristocracy and some representatives of businessmen, while the house of lords was weakened. With the support of parliament, Henry viii carried out a religious reform that freed the church of England from the control of the Pope. The parliament, following the king's will, passed bills which were good for the king and for the new aristocracy and the bourgeoisie, and its activities were expanded. At that time, the parliament was still the king's instrument, and the expansion of the parliament also meant the strengthening of the autocratic monarchy. By the 17th century, this practice of passing various ACTS by parliament, assisted by parliament, had become the legal basis for the bourgeois and new aristocracy to oppose the throne. During queen Elizabeth's reign, when the monopoly of many goods on her minions was so detrimental to the development of industry and commerce, there was an outcry in parliament. The queen reluctantly agreed to stop selling exclusivity to appease parliament. Parliament was also dissatisfied with the king's religious policy. In the 1670s and 1880s, the number of puritans in England increased greatly, and they demanded to leave the church of England, create their own church groups, and guarantee the full independence of the new bourgeoisie in church affairs. And Elizabeth was extremely hostile to puritans, and puritans were persecuted like catholics, but the number of puritans continued to increase. This heralds a rift in the alliance between the authoritarian monarchy and the bourgeoisie. Some of the pilgrims later migrated to North America.

In the mid-17th century, with the progress of the revolution of the new class in Britain, the royal opposition was formed in the parliament, with the industrial and trading class as the main force. They took the parliament as a front, leading workers and peasants to fight against the feudal monarchy, and finally established their own rule through the civil war. However, the feudal forces did not completely disappear from the British political arena since then, and various vassal states remained. The bourgeoisie and the new aristocracy also feared that the populist revolution would finally shake their rule. Therefore, the two parties reached a compromise and formally established the constitutional political system through the "glorious revolution" in 1688.

In 1689 and 1701, the bill of rights and the law of succession were passed, and parliament was confirmed as the highest legislature above the king, marking the true establishment of the parliamentary system in England. Over the next two centuries, the bourgeois revolutions of England and France and the reforms of Prussia and Russia finally brought an end to the feudal autocracy, with parliamentary systems mushrooming above the ruins of feudal royalty and modern parliamentary democracy at its peak.

In the international political practice, many countries are satisfied with the institutional arrangement of the UK, believing that the national machinery has been very perfect and there is no point to it, especially the parliamentary system. But Britain, as the "mother of parliament", is not stagnating, but changing and perfecting the parliamentary system. In addition to the three major changes I have highlighted here, there have actually been several changes and changes in the British parliamentary system. In 1529, a bills committee was formed; In 1554, the voice and the count went together; The third reading of the bill of 1581 was established; James I and Stuart dissolved parliament three times, and even ordered the arrest of members of parliament; In 1628, Charles I's petition of power established the principle of the protection of private property, again emphasizing the supreme power of parliament over taxation; At the end of the 20th century, the upper house reform passed and so on. All this has promoted the further maturity and perfection of the British parliamentary system.

As walter reed, an English scholar, put it, In his letter to the economist in 1865, he argued that Britain's parliament was not "a mysterious entity, but an invention of reason. The advantage of it is simply that it achieves some good objectives, and therefore parliament can be improved by adhering to these objectives and carefully shaping the British constitution towards them. There is no reason to think that our laws, political institutions and governance should not be made to operate like a scientific machine.

Although the British parliament has been criticized by many people for its numerous procedures, complicated procedures, red tape and low efficiency in practical activities, on the other hand, it should be well established and well-formed, and its activities and results can stand the test of time. As the exercise of state power, the handling of public affairs, broad and far-reaching power activities, people have to be cautious, not cautious. In fact, historically and in the long run, we can still find the high efficiency of parliamentary activity in the UK, thus ensuring the stability and development of the country.

要想成绩好，英国论文得写好，51due代写平台为你提供英国留学资讯，专业辅导，还为你提供专业英国essay代写，paper代写，report代写，需要找论文代写的话快来联系我们51due工作客服QQ：800020041或者Wechat：Abby0900吧。

0 notes

juliandmouton30 · 7 years ago

Text

UK government calls for industry input on post-Brexit immigration system

Design bodies are consulting their members on what the UK's immigration policy should look like post-Brexit, after the government invited business sectors to submit their views on the subject.

Home secretary Amber Rudd announced at the end of last week that she was tasking the Migration Advisory Committee with gathering evidence on the impacts of Brexit. The independent body will also look at how to align the UK's new immigration system with its industrial strategy.

The committee has now put out a call for evidence on the role European Union workers play in various sectors, while design and architecture organisations including the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) have said they are preparing responses on the topic.

"RIBA members have identified access to talent as a top priority in Brexit negotiations and the UK government must recognise the benefits of the UK as an attractive place to work for ambitious architects from across the globe," said RIBA president Jane Duncan.

"We need to ensure that any potential change to the immigration system neither drives away international talent nor increases the burden for practices that want to hire talent from abroad."

This is the first study instigated by the government with a specific focus on immigration since the EU referendum over a year ago – a fact for which it has come under fire from critics. Immigration does form part of the government's existing enquiry into the impact of Brexit on the creative industries.

The committee will report back in late 2018, although Brexit negotiations are already underway and the UK is set to formally exit the EU in March 2019.

Stop using EU nationals as a Brexit "negotiating chip", say Rogers and Chipperfield

"This will be a chance for businesses and employers to express their honest opinions, independently of the government," Amber Rudd wrote in the Financial Times. "It is critically important the views of each industry are reflected accurately in this evidence, so I would encourage industry representatives to get involved in the process."

As well as the RIBA, the Design Business Association (DBA) and Creative Industries Federation (CIF) have said they are consulting their membership on immigration issues in preparation for a submission to the government.

The DBA said the best future immigration system for the design industry was one that enabled it to hire the best candidates, regardless of their background or nationality.

"We need assurances that a tough immigration policy (part of our Brexit negotiations) and the current education policy (that sidelines creativity) won't bring about a drought in candidates entering the UK design industry or starting new businesses in two years' time – that will put the brakes on growth in the sector that is the fastest growing and biggest contributor to GDP in the UK," said DBA CEO Deborah Dawton.

"Ours is a people business. Bottom line is you need great people to grow it and they have to come from somewhere."

The CIF said it was preparing a submission based on a members' survey that indicated the sector's EU workforce could not be replaced by a solely local workforce.

"A survey of federation members in June this year revealed the UK's creative industries employ high numbers of European workers who cannot be replaced by British staff," said the CIF. "It suggested cutting immigration will damage the fastest growing part of the British economy meaning it is essential that a post-Brexit immigration system that works for the sector is established."

"The federation is currently investigating what a new immigration and visa system that works for the creative industries should look like and will report on its findings in the autumn."

The design and architecture sector has been pushing the UK government to ensure it can continue to recruit talent from abroad, which has emerged as one of the industry's key concerns since the Brexit vote.

According to a survey of practices conducted for Dezeen, almost half of all architects working in London come from overseas, with 33 percent coming from either the EU, the European Economic Area or Switzerland.

Immigration cuts will damage UK's creative industries, study finds

Amanda Levete, whose practices contributed to the survey, said at the time that 80 per cent of architects at her firm are from abroad.

"Turning off the tap of talent coming to work here would be very damaging to our profession," she added.

Earlier this month, over 500 leading arts organisations and individuals signed the Our Shared European Future statement, which called for post-Brexit residency for EU nationals  currently working in the UK and free movement between countries for skilled workers.

International recruitment was also a key point in Dezeen's Brexit Design Manifesto.

At a recent business talk hosted by Dezeen in London, Zaha Hadid Architects' global head of people and talent Caroline Roberts said that a large part of her job had become helping the company's 400-strong workforce – two-thirds of which hails from the EU – to deal with the implications of Brexit.

"The UK isn't feeling as welcoming or so much as a land of opportunity as it did," Roberts said. "There is that fear as to not having the mobility in talent as we've had and we've enjoyed in the past."

The Migration Advisory Committee's investigation will close on 27 October 2017. Guidelines for submissions can be viewed on the gov.uk website.

The post UK government calls for industry input on post-Brexit immigration system appeared first on Dezeen.

from ifttt-furniture https://www.dezeen.com/2017/08/04/uk-government-calls-for-industry-input-on-post-brexit-immigration-system/

0 notes