#row over waqf properties

[youthchronical]

Muslim Vedike rues attempts to divide Hindus and Muslims on waqf property issue

Muslim Bandhavya Vedike spokesperson Mushtaq Hennabail at a press conference in Udupi on Tuesday. | Photo Credit: UMESH S. SHETTIGAR The Karnataka Muslim Bandhavya Vedike on Tuesday said attempts are being made to divide Hindus and Muslims thereby disturbing peace and harmony in the State with regard to waqf properties. Vedike spokesperson Mushtaq Hennabail told reporters at Udupi that the…

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 5th November. In an escalating row over the Waqf Board issue, Union Textiles Minister Giriraj Singh has openly accused Congress leader Rahul Gandhi of attempting to create civil unrest in Bharat. Speaking on the subject, Singh alleged that Rahul Gandhi is deploying “new toolkits” with an agenda to stir division and unrest under the guise of the Waqf Board debate. “Rahul Gandhi wants to create civil war in the country in the name of the Waqf Board, for which he is bringing in new toolkits,” Singh declared, dismissing the opposition’s stance as part of Congress’ alleged history of creating social tensions. The minister also took aim at Congress leader Salman Khurshid for his remarks related to religious issues affecting Hindus in Bangladesh, suggesting that Congress leaders have been insensitive to the concerns of Hindus within and outside Bharat. The Waqf Board controversy has intensified following a recent walkout by opposition members of the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) tasked with reviewing the proposed Waqf Amendment Bill. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has criticized Congress, particularly targeting the Congress-led government in Karnataka for reportedly sending notices to farmers threatening land seizures in areas under Waqf jurisdiction. Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Minister for Rural Development Priyank Kharge have dismissed these claims as “politically motivated” accusations aimed at stirring public anxiety. Background of the Waqf Board Controversy The Waqf Board, an Islamic endowment institution, manages properties for religious, educational, and charitable purposes within Muslim communities. The Waqf Amendment Bill, currently under consideration by the JPC, has sparked significant debate due to its proposed changes. The bill aims to update regulations governing Waqf properties, and many view these changes as necessary to prevent mismanagement and ensure accountability. However, critics from Congress and other opposition parties argue that some amendments could potentially compromise the autonomy of Waqf institutions, impacting the interests of the Muslim community. The issue gained further traction after reports emerged that Waqf properties in Karnataka included lands that might impact farmers. The BJP alleged that Congress was using the Waqf Board to undermine Hindu farmers in Karnataka. However, Congress leaders, including Priyank Kharge, have rejected these allegations, claiming the BJP’s accusations lack factual backing. Kharge questioned the BJP’s motivations, pointing out that Waqf properties continued operations under previous BJP administrations without such controversies, suggesting that the BJP’s concerns are politically driven. Giriraj Singh’s Accusations and the Alleged “Toolkit” Giriraj Singh’s remarks have ignited further political animosity, with his accusation that Rahul Gandhi is trying to create “civil war” in Bharat by using the Waqf Board issue as a divisive tool. He alleged that the Congress is deploying “toolkits” to exploit communal sensitivities, accusing Rahul Gandhi of leveraging the Waqf issue to divide the country. This statement suggests a belief within the BJP that Congress is attempting to destabilize societal harmony, a recurring theme in the BJP’s critiques of Congress’s stance on minority issues. Singh’s accusations come on the heels of Congress’s historical support for minority rights and their criticism of BJP policies which they allege marginalize certain communities. However, the current scenario sees Singh framing Congress’s actions as inciting instability, particularly with regard to Rahul Gandhi’s purported involvement in pushing an agenda through “toolkits” that allegedly fuel discontent. Salman Khurshid’s Comments on Hindu Atrocities in Bangladesh Singh also criticized Congress leader Salman Khurshid for comments allegedly downplaying atrocities against Hindus in Bangladesh. Singh’s response reflects a broader

sentiment within the BJP, which contends that Congress leaders have consistently failed to acknowledge the plight of Hindus facing persecution abroad. Khurshid’s statement, which suggested that Bharat might see similar communal unrest, was perceived by Singh as a threat to communal harmony in Bharat and was portrayed as an example of Congress fostering discord within the country. Congress’s Defense and BJP’s Allegations in Karnataka On the other side of the debate, Congress leaders have countered BJP’s claims by denying allegations that the Waqf Board’s activities would impact farmers. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Priyank Kharge emphasized that no farmer would be displaced due to the Waqf properties. Kharge has accused the BJP of hypocrisy, questioning why the BJP didn’t address Waqf-related concerns during their own tenure in Karnataka. This exchange has exposed the deep-seated political rift in Karnataka, where the issue is seen as a tool for political mobilization in the highly polarized atmosphere of state politics. Joint Parliamentary Committee’s Role and Upcoming Discussions To address the ongoing concerns and attempt to reach a resolution, Jagdambika Pal, the Chairman of the JPC on the Waqf Amendment Bill, announced that a series of meetings would be held to deliberate on the issue. These discussions are expected to gather perspectives from various stakeholders, including Islamic scholars, former judges, Supreme Court and High Court lawyers, and representatives of minority organizations. The goal of these meetings is to present a balanced view on the Waqf Board issue, aiming to address concerns from all sides while maintaining a transparent legislative process. The JPC sessions reflect an attempt to navigate the controversy constructively, although it remains to be seen whether they will succeed in reducing the political tensions surrounding the amendment. Conclusion The Waqf Board controversy has quickly become a flashpoint in Bharatiya politics, with both the BJP and Congress leveraging the issue to rally their respective support bases. Giriraj Singh’s accusation that Rahul Gandhi is attempting to incite civil unrest underscores the intense polarization within Bharat’s political landscape, where religious and cultural issues are often intertwined with broader electoral strategies. While the BJP asserts that the Congress is using the Waqf Board as a means to undermine social stability, Congress leaders argue that the BJP’s actions are politically motivated attempts to vilify minority communities and create an atmosphere of fear. The coming discussions by the JPC offer a potential path forward, although it is uncertain whether they will resolve the underlying political discord. The political discourse surrounding the Waqf Board controversy highlights a troubling pattern in Bharatiya politics, where complex issues of governance, minority rights, and land use are often reduced to polarized narratives. The accusation of a “civil war” intent attributed to Rahul Gandhi is indicative of a rhetoric that amplifies division rather than promoting nuanced dialogue. While Singh’s concerns about the potential misuse of the Waqf Board are valid within a legal context, framing the issue as an existential threat risks alienating minority communities and stoking social divisions. Similarly, Congress’s insistence on dismissing BJP’s concerns as politically motivated also misses an opportunity for constructive engagement on issues that have tangible impacts on communities. If Congress’s position is rooted in defending minority rights, it would benefit from an open discussion about how to balance the interests of all stakeholders, including farmers potentially affected by Waqf land use. Bharat’s political future depends on leaders from all parties willing to address sensitive issues like the Waqf Board with transparency, empathy, and a commitment to unity. Rather than escalating tensions through accusations and counter-accusations, both

the BJP and Congress have a responsibility to foster a discourse that seeks real solutions for communal harmony and equity. Ultimately, the JPC’s efforts to bring together diverse perspectives on the Waqf Amendment Bill could set an example for how Bharat’s democratic institutions can mediate complex issues in a manner that upholds the interests of all citizens.   The post Waqf Board Tensions Rise as Giriraj Singh Accuses Rahul of Fomenting Division appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[news365times]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 5th November. In an escalating row over the Waqf Board issue, Union Textiles Minister Giriraj Singh has openly accused Congress leader Rahul Gandhi of attempting to create civil unrest in Bharat. Speaking on the subject, Singh alleged that Rahul Gandhi is deploying “new toolkits” with an agenda to stir division and unrest under the guise of the Waqf Board debate. “Rahul Gandhi wants to create civil war in the country in the name of the Waqf Board, for which he is bringing in new toolkits,” Singh declared, dismissing the opposition’s stance as part of Congress’ alleged history of creating social tensions. The minister also took aim at Congress leader Salman Khurshid for his remarks related to religious issues affecting Hindus in Bangladesh, suggesting that Congress leaders have been insensitive to the concerns of Hindus within and outside Bharat. The Waqf Board controversy has intensified following a recent walkout by opposition members of the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) tasked with reviewing the proposed Waqf Amendment Bill. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has criticized Congress, particularly targeting the Congress-led government in Karnataka for reportedly sending notices to farmers threatening land seizures in areas under Waqf jurisdiction. Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Minister for Rural Development Priyank Kharge have dismissed these claims as “politically motivated” accusations aimed at stirring public anxiety. Background of the Waqf Board Controversy The Waqf Board, an Islamic endowment institution, manages properties for religious, educational, and charitable purposes within Muslim communities. The Waqf Amendment Bill, currently under consideration by the JPC, has sparked significant debate due to its proposed changes. The bill aims to update regulations governing Waqf properties, and many view these changes as necessary to prevent mismanagement and ensure accountability. However, critics from Congress and other opposition parties argue that some amendments could potentially compromise the autonomy of Waqf institutions, impacting the interests of the Muslim community. The issue gained further traction after reports emerged that Waqf properties in Karnataka included lands that might impact farmers. The BJP alleged that Congress was using the Waqf Board to undermine Hindu farmers in Karnataka. However, Congress leaders, including Priyank Kharge, have rejected these allegations, claiming the BJP’s accusations lack factual backing. Kharge questioned the BJP’s motivations, pointing out that Waqf properties continued operations under previous BJP administrations without such controversies, suggesting that the BJP’s concerns are politically driven. Giriraj Singh’s Accusations and the Alleged “Toolkit” Giriraj Singh’s remarks have ignited further political animosity, with his accusation that Rahul Gandhi is trying to create “civil war” in Bharat by using the Waqf Board issue as a divisive tool. He alleged that the Congress is deploying “toolkits” to exploit communal sensitivities, accusing Rahul Gandhi of leveraging the Waqf issue to divide the country. This statement suggests a belief within the BJP that Congress is attempting to destabilize societal harmony, a recurring theme in the BJP’s critiques of Congress’s stance on minority issues. Singh’s accusations come on the heels of Congress’s historical support for minority rights and their criticism of BJP policies which they allege marginalize certain communities. However, the current scenario sees Singh framing Congress’s actions as inciting instability, particularly with regard to Rahul Gandhi’s purported involvement in pushing an agenda through “toolkits” that allegedly fuel discontent. Salman Khurshid’s Comments on Hindu Atrocities in Bangladesh Singh also criticized Congress leader Salman Khurshid for comments allegedly downplaying atrocities against Hindus in Bangladesh. Singh’s response reflects a broader

sentiment within the BJP, which contends that Congress leaders have consistently failed to acknowledge the plight of Hindus facing persecution abroad. Khurshid’s statement, which suggested that Bharat might see similar communal unrest, was perceived by Singh as a threat to communal harmony in Bharat and was portrayed as an example of Congress fostering discord within the country. Congress’s Defense and BJP’s Allegations in Karnataka On the other side of the debate, Congress leaders have countered BJP’s claims by denying allegations that the Waqf Board’s activities would impact farmers. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Priyank Kharge emphasized that no farmer would be displaced due to the Waqf properties. Kharge has accused the BJP of hypocrisy, questioning why the BJP didn’t address Waqf-related concerns during their own tenure in Karnataka. This exchange has exposed the deep-seated political rift in Karnataka, where the issue is seen as a tool for political mobilization in the highly polarized atmosphere of state politics. Joint Parliamentary Committee’s Role and Upcoming Discussions To address the ongoing concerns and attempt to reach a resolution, Jagdambika Pal, the Chairman of the JPC on the Waqf Amendment Bill, announced that a series of meetings would be held to deliberate on the issue. These discussions are expected to gather perspectives from various stakeholders, including Islamic scholars, former judges, Supreme Court and High Court lawyers, and representatives of minority organizations. The goal of these meetings is to present a balanced view on the Waqf Board issue, aiming to address concerns from all sides while maintaining a transparent legislative process. The JPC sessions reflect an attempt to navigate the controversy constructively, although it remains to be seen whether they will succeed in reducing the political tensions surrounding the amendment. Conclusion The Waqf Board controversy has quickly become a flashpoint in Bharatiya politics, with both the BJP and Congress leveraging the issue to rally their respective support bases. Giriraj Singh’s accusation that Rahul Gandhi is attempting to incite civil unrest underscores the intense polarization within Bharat’s political landscape, where religious and cultural issues are often intertwined with broader electoral strategies. While the BJP asserts that the Congress is using the Waqf Board as a means to undermine social stability, Congress leaders argue that the BJP’s actions are politically motivated attempts to vilify minority communities and create an atmosphere of fear. The coming discussions by the JPC offer a potential path forward, although it is uncertain whether they will resolve the underlying political discord. The political discourse surrounding the Waqf Board controversy highlights a troubling pattern in Bharatiya politics, where complex issues of governance, minority rights, and land use are often reduced to polarized narratives. The accusation of a “civil war” intent attributed to Rahul Gandhi is indicative of a rhetoric that amplifies division rather than promoting nuanced dialogue. While Singh’s concerns about the potential misuse of the Waqf Board are valid within a legal context, framing the issue as an existential threat risks alienating minority communities and stoking social divisions. Similarly, Congress’s insistence on dismissing BJP’s concerns as politically motivated also misses an opportunity for constructive engagement on issues that have tangible impacts on communities. If Congress’s position is rooted in defending minority rights, it would benefit from an open discussion about how to balance the interests of all stakeholders, including farmers potentially affected by Waqf land use. Bharat’s political future depends on leaders from all parties willing to address sensitive issues like the Waqf Board with transparency, empathy, and a commitment to unity. Rather than escalating tensions through accusations and counter-accusations, both

the BJP and Congress have a responsibility to foster a discourse that seeks real solutions for communal harmony and equity. Ultimately, the JPC’s efforts to bring together diverse perspectives on the Waqf Amendment Bill could set an example for how Bharat’s democratic institutions can mediate complex issues in a manner that upholds the interests of all citizens.   The post Waqf Board Tensions Rise as Giriraj Singh Accuses Rahul of Fomenting Division appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[buzz-london]

Waqf Land Row: Documents Expose Waqf Stealth Land Grab | The Hard Facts - 28 Oct 2024

Waqf Land Row: Documents Expose Waqf Stealth Land Grab | The Hard Facts With Rahul Shivshankar  

After the Karnataka State Board of Waqfs claimed ownership of land of farmers in Vijayapura district, fresh evidence showed that the Waqf board’s name was inserted in revenue records overnight, according to a News18 report.

Earlier, Karnataka Minister MB Patil clarified that the confusion over 1,200 acres in Honavada being designated as Waqf property was due to an error in the gazette notification in 1974.

Karnataka Law and Parliamentary Affairs Minister H K Patil on Monday said the notices issued to them will be withdrawn, and the Deputy Commissioner is inquiring into the  "mistake".

[leyhejuhyunghan]

NASA Studies an Unusual Arctic Warming Event on Lurianic Kabbalah Shevira – Shattering of the sephirot vessels, Tikun – Rectification and The Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist Vilayat-e Faqih Wilayat al-Faqih, al-omour al-hesbiah and Waqf

NASA Studies an Unusual Arctic Warming Event on Lurianic Kabbalah Shevira – Shattering of the sephirot vessels, Tikun – Rectification and The Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist Vilayat-e Faqih Wilayat al-Faqih, al-omour al-hesbiah and Waqf

Les XX and Conservatoire de Paris Vincent D'indy (1851-1931) Diptyque mediterraneen, Op. 87 on The Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist Vilayat-e Faqih Wilayat al-Faqih, al-omour al-hesbiah and Waqf

https://www.facebook.com/juhyung.han.5/posts/1717984798260687 http://blog.naver.com/artnouveau19/221221460530

NASA Studies an Unusual Arctic Warming Event https://youtu.be/lCvTMqeUwKw

NASA Goddard Published on Feb 28, 2018

Winter temperatures are soaring in the Arctic for the fourth winter in a row. The heat, accompanied by moist air, is entering the Arctic not only through the sector of the North Atlantic Ocean that lies between Greenland and Europe, as it has done in previous years, but is also coming from the North Pacific through the Bering Strait. “We have seen winter warming events before, but they’re becoming more frequent and more intense,” said Alek Petty, a sea ice researcher at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. Scientists are waiting to see how much this heat wave will impact the wintertime sea ice maximum extent, which has been shrinking in the past decades and has hit record lows each of the past three years. The sea ice levels are already at record lows or near-record lows in several areas of the Arctic. Another exceptional event this winter is the opening up of the sea ice cover north of Greenland, releasing heat from the ocean to the atmosphere and making the sea ice more vulnerable to further melting. “This is a region where we have the thickest multi-year sea ice and expect it to not be mobile, to be resilient,” Petty said. “But now this ice is moving pretty quickly, pushed by strong southerly winds and probably affected by the warm temperatures, too.” Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Kathryn Mersmann (USRA): Lead Producer Maria-Jose Vinas Garcia (Telophase Corp): Lead Writer Alek A. Petty (University of Maryland): Scientist Music: Crystal Light by Michael Holborn [PRS], William Henries [PRS] Satellite data from NASA WorldView: https://go.nasa.gov/2FCvRkJ

The Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist, also called the Governance of the Jurist (Persian: ولایت فقیه‎, Vilayat-e Faqih; Arabic: ولاية الفقيه‎, Wilayat al-Faqih) and Limited Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist – holds that guardianship should be limited to non-litigious matters (al-omour al-hesbiah) including religious endowments (Waqf)

Vincent d'Indy (1851-1931) Diptyque mediterraneen, Op. 87: I. Soleil matinal https://youtu.be/osT69neRBW0

Vincent d'Indy (1851-1931) Diptyque mediterraneen, Op. 87: II. Soleil vesperal https://youtu.be/9aP7paq0hvo

The Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist, also called the Governance of the Jurist (Persian: ولایت فقیه‎, Vilayat-e Faqih; Arabic: ولاية الفقيه‎, Wilayat al-Faqih), is a post-Age-of-Occultation theory in Shia Islam which holds that Islam gives a faqīh(Islamic jurist) custodianship over people. Ulama supporting the theory disagree over how encompassing custodianship should be. One interpretation – Limited Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist – holds that guardianship should be limited to non-litigious matters (al-omour al-hesbiah)[1] including religious endowments (Waqf)[2] judicial matters[3] and the property for which no specific person is responsible. Another – Absolute Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist – maintains that Guardianship should include all issues for which Prophet of Islam and Shi'a Imam have responsibility, including governance of the country. The idea of guardianship as rule was advanced by the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in a series of lectures in 1970 and now forms the basis of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The constitution of Iran calls for a faqih, or Vali-ye faqih (Guardian Jurist), to serve as the Supreme Leader of the government.[4][5] In the context of Iran, Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist is often referred to as "rule by the jurisprudent", or "rule of the Islamic jurist”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guardianship_of_the_Islamic_Jurist

Shevirat ha-Kelim (Breaking of the Vessels) http://www.newkabbalah.com/shev.html Lurianic Kabbalah is a school of kabbalah named after the Jewish rabbi who developed it: Isaac Luria (1534–1572; also known as the "ARI'zal", "Ha'ARI" or "Ha'ARI Hakadosh"). Lurianic Kabbalah gave a seminal new account of Kabbalistic thought that its followers synthesised with, and read into, the earlier Kabbalah of the Zohar that had disseminated in Medieval circles. Lurianic Kabbalah describes new doctrines of the origins of Creation, and the concepts of Olam HaTohu (Hebrew: עולם התהו "The World of Tohu-Chaos") and Olam HaTikun (Hebrew: עולם התיקון "The World of Tikun-Rectification"), which represent two archetypal spiritual states of being and consciousness. These concepts derive from Isaac Luria's interpretation of and mythical speculations on references in the Zohar.[1][2] The main popularizer of Luria's ideas was Rabbi Hayyim ben Joseph Vital of Calabria, who claimed to be the official interpreter of the Lurianic system, though some disputed this claim.[3] Together, the compiled teachings written by Luria's school after his death are metaphorically called "Kitvei HaARI" (Writings of the ARI), though they differed on some core interpretations in the early generations. Previous interpretations of the Zohar had culminated in the rationally influenced scheme of Moses ben Jacob Cordovero in Safed, immediately before Luria's arrival. Both Cordovero's and Luria's systems gave Kabbalah a theological systemisation to rival the earlier eminence of Medieval Jewish philosophy. Under the influence of the mystical renaissance in 16th-century Safed, Lurianism became the near-universal mainstream Jewish theology in the early-modern era,[4] both in scholarly circles, and in the popular imagination. The Lurianic scheme, read by its followers as harmonious with, and successively more advanced than the Cordoverian,[2] mostly displaced it, becoming the foundation of subsequent developments in Jewish mysticism. After the Ari, the Zohar was interpreted in Lurianic terms, and later esoteric Kabbalists expanded mystical theory within the Lurianic system. The later Hasidic and Mitnagdic movements diverged over implications of Lurianic Kabbalah, and its social role in popular mysticism. The Sabbatean mystical heresy would also derive its source from Lurianic messianism, but distort the Kabbalistic interdependence of mysticism with Halakha Jewish observance. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lurianic_Kabbalah

WORLD NEWS MARCH 4, 2016 / 6:52 PM / 2 YEARS AGO Turkish court jails two Syrians over drowning of toddler Aylan: media

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-migrants-turkey-toddler/turkish-court-jails-two-syrians-over-drowning-of-toddler-aylan-media-idUSKCN0W60W3

[buzz-london]

Why Did Congress Gift Prestigious Properties To Waqf Board? - 16 Sept 2022

In this episode of India Upfront, Rahul Shivashankar will be discussing the outrage over the waqf land claim row. Amid Waqf's Claim Over Hindu villages in Tamilnadu new developments discloses secrets of the waqf board. Days before the 2014 elections, the UPA govt 'gifts' 123 prime properties in Delhi to Waqf. Dargah Sahib, Muslim graveyard (Lodhi road), and Minto Bridge (Cannaught Place) are some of the places gifted to waqf. "There are three characters of the Waqf property. Nobody can declare any property as Waqf's until the original owner has gifted that", says Kamru Choudhury. "Why only for one community? What about Sikhs, Hindus, Christians?", confronts Rahul Shivshankar. "Today, land belonging to Christians is not under state control, Muslims have a Waqf act where they have autonomy. Hindus are the only community, whose lands are under the control of the state. How is this fair?", Says Sai Deepak. 

Despite this, Congress lost elections! Its vote bank politics failed, yet, it continues to think the muslim vote bank will allow it to get back to power!

https://youtu.be/Ee04V1u1_Fc