Tumgik
#recylcling animations
im-a-normal-cat · 4 years
Text
OK.
Do you all know what goes on behind the scene when producing any movie, video game, or any media using animation? All of you accusing EA of being lazy for having the audacity to reuse animation? DO YOU?
Animations are so expensive. Especially in a video game, where they have to work for all types and shape of characters. In the Sims, they need to produce different animations for every different skeleton (i mean toddlers children and adults. Maybe elders too not sure.). Animations have to be compatible with standing and sitting positions. They need to be compatible with the discussions interactions. They need specific animations for some emotions. They need to work regardless of the hairstyles or accessories. They have to fit a certain timeframe. Maybe they have to loop (and by god loops are hard).
(By the way, the hardest animations to do are....... walk cycles.)
If new assets are created, what is the most logical thing you do? Create new animations from scratch, even though the actions are super similar to that animation pack you already have (stand at a workstation, pull a crank, hammer action, be satisfied)?
Or do you just... save yourself and the production team some time and reuse that previous animation?
So please, before you complain about reuse of assets, try to think about this in terms of PEOPLE DOING A JOB WITH RULES, BUDGETS, AND LIMITS.
AND EVERY MEDIA PRODUCTION REUSES ASSETS!!!! STOP VILIFYING THIS VERY NORMAL THING!!!!
23 notes · View notes
aesthetelabel · 4 years
Photo
Tumblr media
We make sure all of our products are cruelty free so you don’t have to. Shop without having to check the labels. We will never stock anything containing leather, wool, silk or any other animal products. . . . . Photograph Aesthete Label Pinterest @sightmanagement #crueltyfree #plantbased #ethical #vegan #art #nature #beauty #ethicalvegan #slowliving #sustainable #sustainableliving #britishbusiness #simplethingsmadebeautiful #simplelife #animallovers #equinephotography #plasticfreepackaging #recylcled #biodegradable #smallbusinessuk #consciousliving #aesthetelabel #veganlifestylestore #manchester #staffordshire https://www.instagram.com/p/CBeNtBwJ7r-/?igshid=apvqsk5pvwwx
3 notes · View notes
everyequality · 2 years
Link
Check out this listing I just added to my Poshmark closet: Sticker set, sexy anime black and red body butt boobs and more. Laptop / cup.
0 notes
filtration-products · 6 years
Text
Grapes, Nuts, and Your Dogs Health – Foods that Fido should Avoid
"Magoo was a big, playful Labrador retriever who often got himself into sticky situations …"
So begins a story in the latest report from the ASPCA on foods that may be toxic to dogs. It turns out that Magoo got into the pantry and snagged himself about a pound of raisins. He ate the whole thing, of course.
The ASPCA never mentions Magoo's fate. But they do tell us that as little as a handy of raisins can impair a dogs health and has been fatal for some. Ditto for the grape.
Who Knew?
Growing up, I regard our family dogs as "the first cycle of the dishwasher". They were good about waiting their turn for whatever we left on our plates, and we were not too concerned about offering them "people food". It never crossed our minds that our dogs health could be affected by a few measly table scraps. What was safe for us, we figured, was safe for our pets.
What's more, whenever I ate grapes, I liked to give one or two to our German Shepherd "Tiffany". The grapes always popped out of her mouth when she tried to bite into them and Tiffany, ever the good sport, refused to give up until she'd squashed each one into submission. It guaranteed at least 60 seconds of harmless fun.
Tiffany was also fond of chewing gum (she chewed it – wrapper and all – but did not swallow it!) We had the sugarless kind, which is often sweetened these days with xylitol.
Little did I know that I might have been poisoning our family pet! (More on xylitol below).
Why are grapes harmful?
As far as grapes and raisins go, no one is sure why they're harmful. It's been confirmed that even grapes grown without fertilizers or pesticides can be toxic to dogs. But not to every dog, and not every time. It's also not known whether small amounts eaten over a long time period could have a cumulative effect.
What we do know is that the end result in almost all reported cases of grape or raisin toxicity is acute kidney failure. (The term "acute" means that the condition is severe and comes on quickly.) The dog absolutely can not produce urine, which means they can not filter toxins out of their systems – a process essential to life.
During the twelve-month period in which the effects of grapes were studied, the ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center handled 140 cases involving one or more dogs. Over a third of the dogs developed symptoms ranging from vomiting to kidney failure, and seven dogs died. The ASPCA based their study on reported cases, so naturally there may be cases where a dogs health is entirely unaffected by eating grapes. But until they know all the facts, the Society advises against feeding pets grapes or raisins in any amount .
An ounce of prevention
So, your dog just scored himself a big box of raisins. What's a pet owner to do?
The first line of defense, if the grapes or raisins were eaten recently, is to induce vomiting and administrator activated charcoal (it absorbs toxins in the GI tract). Vomiting is also the first sign that your dog is in trouble, so skip right to the activated charcoal if vomiting has already occurred. (In a pinch you can make your own activated charcoal by charring a piece of toast until it's blackened and crumbles easily.) Then call your vet right away.
Can not reach the vet? Call ASPCA Poison Control: 888-426-4435
The vet will keep your dog on intravenous fluids for at least 48 hours and monitor blood chemistry daily. Normal blood work after 3 days usually means your dog is in the clear.
Keeping a watchful eye out, of course, is the best way to keep your pet out of trouble. Like children, dogs (and other pets) have a knack for getting into mischief when we're not looking.
It's Not Just the Grapes …
There are other foods your dog should be kept away from, and some of them may surprise you.
Here are some other foods that can put a dogs health in arms way:
Chocolate
Who can resist chocolate? Like it your not, your dog.
Chocolate is made with cocoa beans and cocoa beans contain a chemical called Theobromine, which is toxic to dogs. Different types of chocolate have varying effects on dogs health. Dark chocolate has the largest theobromine, coming in at a whopping 450mg (compared to 1mg for white chocolate). So on Valentine's Day, you're actually kind to your best buddy if you eat all the chocolates yourself!
Cocoa Mulch
Cocoa bean shells are a by-product of chocolate production (which is how mulch made it into the "foods" category) and are popular as mulch for landscaping. Homeowners like the attractive color and scent, and the fact that the mulch breaks down into an organic fertilizer. However, some dogs like to eat it and it contains Theobromine.
Fatty foods
Fatty foods are hard for a dog to digest and can can overtax the pancreas, leading to pancreatitis. This can threaten your dogs health and is potentially fatal.
Nuts
Macadamia nuts should be avoided. In fact most nuts are not good for a dogs health since their high phosphorus content is said to lead to bladder stones.
Mulch
Mulch is not food, but there's one type tempting enough for dogs to eat. Some dogs are attracted to cocoa mulch, and will eat it in varying quantities. The coca bean shells can contain from 0.2% to 3% theobromine (the toxin) as compaired to 1-4% in unprocessed beans.
Onions
Onions, especially raw episodes, have been shown to trigger hemolytic anemia in dogs. (Stephen J Ettinger, DVM and Edward C. Fieldman, DVM 's book: Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine vol. 2 pg 1884.) Stay away from onion powder too.
Potatoes
Potato poisonings among people and dogs are rare but have occurred. The toxin, solanine, is poorly absorbed and is only found in green sprouts (these occur in tubers exposed to sunlight) and green potato skins. This explains why incidents seldom occur. Note that cooked, mashed potatoes are fine for a dogs health, actually quite nutritious and digestible.
Artificial Sweeteners
Xylitol is used as a sweetener in many products, especially sugarless gum and candies. Ingesting large amounts of products sweetened with xylitol may cause a sudden drop in blood sugar in dogs, resulting depression, loss of coordination, and seizures. According to Dr. Eric K. Dunayer, a consulting veterinarian in clinical toxicology for the poison control center, "These signs can develop quite quickly, at times less than 30 minutes after ingestion of the product" states Dr. Dunayer, "… therefore, it is important that pet owners seek veterinary treatment immediately."
Turkey
Turkey skin is currently thought to cause acute pancreatis in dogs, partly due to it's high fat content.
Other foods listed by the ASPCA as harmful:
Alcoholic beverages
Avocado (the only "fatty" member of the vegetable family)
Coffee (all forms of coffee)
Moldy or spoiled foods
Salt
Yeast dough
Garlic
The Bottom Line
Thanks to a more educated public, fewer economies than foods like chocolate are being reported these days. But it's important to keep up with what's currently known about foods and their effects on dogs health. Grapes and cocoa mulch, for example, were only discovered very recently to have harmful effects. Check frequently with sources like the ASPCA, or sign up for the "Cold Noses News" and we'll keep you informed. (You'll also get a bunch of cool dog stuff along with your free registration.)
Of course, being alert and getting your pet to the vet promptly will help secure a happy exit if something unfortunate should happen. Here's to your dogs health and good nutrition!
Summary of Filtration Products Page: Filtration Products website reports on the recent reports, highlights and purification techniques straight from the filtrations field. Filtration-Products keeps you aligned on filtration and all the related industry advancements including string wound filters, pleated filter elements, melt blown filtration, sock filtration, Pre-RO filtration, from brands such as Parker engineered for water recylcling, and anything else the purification field has to report on.
from Filtration Products https://ift.tt/2Rl7QUr
0 notes
casualtermos-blog · 7 years
Text
Front Clip Versus Again Clip Harnesses
An improved and upgraded successor of the K9-Powerharness first positioned on the market by JULIUS-K9®. The canine harness developed originally for the armed forces and repair canine grew to become common amongst hobby canine homeowners, as they found some great benefits of the gear. So if they pull, they get turned. And if they flip, they aren't heading forward which is where they wish to be going and why they are pulling. This is NOT the consequence they're after. Nylon- Select a nylon dog collar if you need a simple all-climate dog handling solution. No have to take of, is suitable for walking your dog in the rain, snow, swimming and high humidity climate. These collars are extremely strong, gentle weight and fairly priced. Beware of choke chains in canine with quick noses, bulging eyes, and small tracheas (or trachea vulnerable to tracheal collapse). With the harness arrangement, stress once they pull is utilized across their shoulders and never their neck or throat so it is thought-about safer and fewer irritating than many other ‘no-pull‘ solutions obtainable on the market. To help you with making the appropriate buying choice, we've gathered under a few of the most effective no pull dog harness options available on the market, describe their execs and cons and why we recommend them in quick dog harness . This was very useful for my very lively, generally aggressive terrier. The info that you had so many sizes and that th one I purchased was made out of recylcled material made it all the higher. This is a nice harness! I extremely recommend it to anybody who has a dog that pulls. My dog tailored to its use with nice ease. A fast word of caution: You merely MUST enable your canine time to slowly get used to wearing the collar, how it feels and works, earlier than ever utilizing it on a walk. Some coaching and acclimatizing is needed and this might take maybe a number of days, though many dogs do take to them straight away. Assistance dog harness for older dogs is similar to rehabilitation harness and principally used to help older canine attain greater floor, get into the vehicle or climb porch or stairs. Dean and Tyler specialize in heavy-obligation products for giant working canines, including service animals and those in regulation enforcement. Most of their merchandise are huge, sturdy, and bulky. Please be sure to observe your canine once you buy chain leash to keep away from tooth problems. Advertisers know this and lie and trick you into buying something you do not want. I am a giant person of the Simple Walker no pull Harness system, and I just adore it! I foster canine for my rescue group, and the canines all adapt so simply to it. It makes strolling 3-four dogs at a time manageable. A must have in my guide!
0 notes
everyequality · 2 years
Link
Check out this listing I just added to my Poshmark closet: 4 for $5 pack sticker women body looking good sexy gamer anime computer or cup.
0 notes
everyequality · 2 years
Link
Check out this listing I just added to my Poshmark closet: 4 for $5 pack sticker women body looking good sexy gamer anime computer or cup.
0 notes
filtration-products · 6 years
Text
Ionic Air Purifiers – Safety First
Strange but true. It is very, very difficult to find well-organized, properly documented scientific research about the technologies behind ionic air purifiers, a multimillion dollar global industry!
Strange because if the science is solidly grounded, I would expect any manufacturer of ionic air purifiers to trumpet the scientific basis of their brand. I would expect them to expound on the efficacy and effectiveness of their unique technology. Even more so, I would expect them to profusely assure users that their technology is perfectly safe, that they kill microbes but are perfectly harmless to human beings. Sadly, my expectations are not met.
True because I have spent countless hours looking for scientific technical papers supporting the technologies behind existing ionic air purifiers that are on the market and yet I have very little to show for it. Whether deliberate or not, marketeers of ionic air purifiers simply do not bother to put up scientific papers on their websites. Where they do, they make no distinction between safety, efficacy and effectiveness of their specific brands. The scientific references are mentioned only in brief and do not provide enough detail for study by the serious prospective purchasers of the particular air purifier. It is as if manufacturers do not expect anyone to question and scrutinize their products!
Inaccessible Scientific Research
Where I have stumbled upon relevant scientific research papers on the web, they are not readily accessible as they typically come at a prohibitive cost, being charged on a per article basis! I suppose if I am an entrepreneur looking to manufacture a new ionic air purifier I would be willing to invest in the hundreds and possibly thousands of technical papers indicated at some scientific journal websites. But I am only looking for a reliably safe product to buy for my personal use!
It is unfortunate that the scientific world is also commercially driven so that research of great importance is not made freely available to all who are interested or who need to know.
Logical Criteria
Nevertheless, though my head is still spinning from the deluge of inconclusive and confusing web data, my search for the ideal air purifier continues, along these criteria:
(1) Safety – the ionic air purifier technology must not cause any bodily harm to users;
(2) Efficacy – the ionic air purifier technology has been tested in the laboratory to really work on the basis on some thorough scientific research;
(3) Effectiveness – the ionic air purifier technology has been successfully transplanted from the laboratory into an appliance that will deliver the same results in a user setting i.e. home, office, factory, school etc.
Safety Issues
In this article, I want to concentrate on the safety of ionic air purifiers, a factor which I believe overrides the other two criteria of efficacy and effectiveness. There is no point having something that works wonderfully in eliminating microbes but is so powerful that it harms our health. Two important questions need to be answered:
(1) Do the purported beneficial active agents of ionic air purifier technologies cause harm to human tissue? Are negative ions, bipolar ions, hydroxyl radicals, Sharp’s patented plasmacluster ions or whatever name they go by, safe?
(2) Do the unintended by-products of the ionic air purifier technologies cause any harm to human tissue? By-products include ozone and nitric oxides that are highly reactive and known to be harmful in high concentrations.
Beneficial Active Agents – Do They Harm Human Tissue?
No scientific data is available on the web on whether negative ions, bipolar ions, hydroxyl radicals, plasmacluster ions etc are safe in that they do not harm human tissue. There is plenty of data that demonstrate that these active agents effectively eliminate microbes, a subject which I will deal with in a later article. Here I am concerned that the touted potency of the active agents are equally destructive on fragile human tissue. Why is there a paucity of scientific data when millions of dollars are spent by consumers on ionic air purifiers every year?
After extensive but fruitless web searches, I did the next logical thing – ask the manufacturers of ionic air purifiers! From a few enquiries, the answer slowly became clear – the scientific data exists but manufacturers do not want to make them public lest they incur the wrath of animal welfare groups! Is this a real fear or are they hiding some unpleasant truth about their product?
Googling “animal testing” immediately threw up the huge controversy surrounding the use of animals in testing the safety of products meant for human beings. A case in point would be that of Huntingdon Life Sciences, a UK research company that conducts safety testing of commercial products, pharmaceuticals and home appliances. To this day, there is much conflict between testing companies and animal welfare groups. No wonder the cloak of secrecy by ionic air purifier manufacturers who are likely to conduct safety tests using similar testing companies.
Documented Animal Testing
A chance web search result helped me to better understand the animal testing controversy. The safety tests mentioned on the website related to a liquid product, not directly related to any ionic air purifier technology. The liquid is applied onto furniture and other household fittings. In the explanation of one of the benefits, it is claimed that when ultra-violet light in sunlight shines on the liquid, hydroxyl radicals and superoxide ions are released into the air hence destroying any microbes like bacteria, viruses and mold that may be present.
To prove that the liquid is harmless to humans, four categories of safety tests were performed on mice, guinea pigs and rabbits (please be warned that you may find the next paragraph offensive and you may wish to skip to the next paragraph).
They are:
(1) Test for acute oral toxicity – the liquid was orally fed to mice;
(2) Test for primary skin irritation – the liquid was applied onto deliberately abraded skin of rabbits;
(3) Test for skin sensitivities – the liquid was injected under the skin of guinea pigs;
(4) Test for mutagenicity – the liquid was applied to salmonella bacteria to ascertain if they caused mutation in the bacteria nuclei so as to ascertain if the liquid has the ability to cause cancer.
Animals Unharmed
Pretty grim and repulsive stuff! I feel so even though the reports indicate that the tests were conducted in accordance with the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Guidelines for Chemical Testing. I can begin to empathize with the animal welfare camp about such safety testing. Fortunately, for this liquid product, all the animals (even the salmonella bacteria) were found to be unharmed by its application.
This brief insight into animal testing explains why manufacturers of ionic air purifiers refrain from publicizing or even making mention of such tests when they are conducted.
Safety Footnotes
Despite this concern of manufacturers, my web searches have revealed footnotes for certain brands whereby they indicate that safety tests have been conducted on the active agents. In searching for my ionic air purifier, I would be looking for such footnotes. I would expect that no animals had been harmed or the purifier would have no good reason to be on the market for human beings. I would also ascertain that the safety testing was conducted by reputable institutions that are accredited as GLP (Good Laboratory Practice), a set of principles issued by the OECD to recognize organizations which comply with strict scientific testing standards.
Human Testing
In the final analysis, does this mean that there is really no safety testing for the effects of active agents on human beings who use ionic air purifiers? Hardly, if you think about it. All the users become testers, having unknowingly volunteered by the act of purchasing one and using it!
Unfortunately, all we will hear on maufacturers’ websites would be glowing testimonials of the benefits of the purifier. Such testimonials, while helpful, come under the cloud of cherry-picking i.e. only the positive ones are featured. To be considered solid scientific proof that the active agents cause no harm to human tissue, the users’ operation of the ionic air purifier would have had to be subject to very stringent testing criteria and parameters of a GLP laboratory.
It would appear that this is an issue that will never be properly resolved. The only comfort for me is that many other products on the consumer market are sold in the same manner, purely on the good faith of manufacturers and considered safe until proven otherwise.       
Safety – Second Aspect
In a future article, I shall discuss the second aspect of safety. Quite apart from the active agents, human tissue may also be harmed by potential by-products, deliberate or unintended, of ionic air purifiers.
Explanation of Filtration Products Page: Filtration Products website gathers the just out information, summations and separation products right from the separation business. Filtration-Products.com keeps you acquainted on separation and all the related industry advancements including string wound depth filtration, pleated filtration, melt blown depth elements, sock filtration, reverse osmosis filters, from brands such as Donaldson manufactured for water recylcling, and anything else the separation vocation has to mention.
from Filtration Products https://ift.tt/2xMPK8r
0 notes