#real life abusers and fascists arent pure evil either btw everyone is a complicated person and they can change if they want to
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
"it's so refreshing when a villain is just evil instead of trying to redeem them" is the equivalent of "it's so refreshing when a story has a fantasy setting instead of sci-fi." a villain describes a variety of roles characters can take in a story. a villain who stays evil throughout the whole story is a different archetype than a villain who has some kind of redemption and they serve different purposes in the story.
making your villains have sympathetic traits or do sympathetic things isn't a writing choice that is inherently good or bad. it's has the potential to be well written or not depending on the execution. it's literally just a personal preference in what kind of story and villain you like and someone writing a trope you dont prefer doesnt automatically mean its objectively bad writing. so for the LOVE OF GOD can we please talk about something more interesting next time.
no by all means keep judging cartoon villains solely by if they get redeemed in the end. i know some of us like to talk about other stuff like characterization or entertainment value or nuance as something that makes a good villain. but i think the only thing that actually matters is if the villain ends up on good terms with the protagonist at the end. all the Good TM cartoons with Good TM creators make the villains die a Horrible Death for being Abusers or whatever. and all the Bad TM cartoons with Bad TM creators Forgive Fascists by not making them get publicly executed by the 14 year old protagonist in front of the 8 year old target demographic.
i mean im so glad that more cartoons nowadays are subverting the psyop to support fascists that a few queer artists and queer shows definitely invented in 2017. there are so many popular cartoons doing that. it's almost like there are more properties killing their villains now and in the past than there ever were of properties that didn't do this. and it's almost like whether the villain gets redeemed at the end is more about the context of the story and its themes leading up to a narratively sound decision.
but you know. a few queer shows made by trans ppl were popular and they didn't kill their fascists and even had the gall to make them nuanced while also looking into the harm they did. guess it's trendy to forgive your abusers now because like two cartoons said so. out of like 40 other similarly high profile works that just straight up hit their villains with a bus or smth. by all means. keep heaping praise onto that one show about how they "let their villain just be evil" instead of talking about anything more interesting. that's so subversive, everyone's doing it!
#shut up pandora#watch idle screech's new video on belos btw its really good#but dont look into the comments bc while there were some good ones there were a lot of bad ones#alas poor phillip wittebane#you suck and this fan made a video on why you suck#and yet ppl in the comments of literally that video were talking about how much you sucked while missing the reason WHY you sucked#this fandom is baby's first critical thinking exercise for many i suppose#again being in cartoon fandoms means i cant blame teenagers who dont Get It#and theres also a good possibility that the show which was made for children was straight forward enough for them to understand it#so its actually me whos overanalyzing too much#the owl house has always been a little petty in its storytelling towards other properties and certain tropes#and while i do understand the criticism of villain redemptions#where the villain is redeemed but doesnt actually change for the better#or when the villain screwed over the characters so much that it leaves a bad taste in your mouth for them to forgive that#that way the story fucks up with the redemption bc it doesnt make sense withing the context of the story. it breaks immersion#belos getting curbstomped and even odalia being disowned by her daughter is because it wouldnt make sense in the story for them not to be#belos's speech beforehand is making fun of villain redemptions with flimsy justifications its not saying redemptions as a whole is bad#the owl house said if you wanna change for the better thats your problem the protags arent going to help you if you dont help yourself firs#but yall misheard it as this one specific guy is pure evil and can never ever change bc he is aligned with real world ppl who are bad#and like that is literally the opposite of his character he sucks bc he had chances to change but he decided not to#real life abusers and fascists arent pure evil either btw everyone is a complicated person and they can change if they want to#the problem is that they dont want to but thats another can of horses i dont want to count before theyve hatched#anyway idle screech explains the owl house part of it better than me lmao watch the video
29 notes · View notes