#rajya sabha bjp

[uniqueeval]

12 new members elected unopposed to Rajya Sabha, BJP becomes largest party in Upper House with 96 members

Proceedings of the Rajya Sabha are underway during the Monsoon Session of Parliament, in New Delhi. File. | Photo Credit: ANI Twelve candidates including nine from BJP, two from its allies in the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) and one from Congress have been elected unopposed to Rajya Sabha in the elections to vacant seats in the Upper House of Parliament. With the BJP increasing numbers in…

[rightnewshindi]

वक्फ विधेयक 2025: लोकसभा में पास, सोनिया गांधी ने लगाया संविधान पर हमले का आरोप, विपक्ष का हंगामा!

Sonia Gandhi News: लोकसभा में 12 घंटे की तीखी बहस और विपक्ष के कड़े विरोध के बाद वक्फ (संशोधन) विधेयक, 2025 को सरकार ने पास करा लिया। यह विधेयक बुधवार देर रात 2 बजे 288-232 मतों से पारित हुआ, लेकिन ��िपक्ष इसे संविधान के खिलाफ बता रहा है। कांग्रेस संसदीय दल की प्रमुख सोनिया गांधी ने इसे “संविधान पर सरेआम हमला” करार देते हुए भाजपा पर समाज को ध्रुवीकरण में झोंकने का आरोप लगाया। अब यह विधेयक गुरुवार…

[bhaskarlive]

In Assam, BJP picks two old loyalists for Rajya Sabha polls

The BJP has chosen two old loyalists as candidates in Assam for the upcoming Rajya Sabha elections.

The ruling party has sufficient strength in terms of numbers and thus the opposition refrained from fielding candidates for the two vacant berths in the upper house of the parliament from Assam.

Source: bhaskarlive.in

[townpostin]

Deepak Prakash Appointed BJP Whip in Rajya Sabha

Former state president takes on dual roles, including co-in-charge of Bihar BJP. Deepak Prakash, BJP Rajya Sabha MP and former state president, has been appointed as the BJP Whip in the Rajya Sabha. RANCHI – Deepak Prakash, a Member of Parliament in the Rajya Sabha from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and former state president, has been given the responsibility of being the BJP Whip in the…

[4rtheyenews]

रायपुर: राज्यसभा के लिए BJP प्रत्याशी राजा देवेंद्र प्रताप सिंह ने भरा नामांकन

राज्यसभा सांसद सरोज पांडे का कार्यकाल पूर्ण हो रहा है। ऐसे में एक राज्यसभा सीट के लिए 27 फरवरी को चुनाव होना है। इसके लिए बीजेपी ने राजा देवेंद्र प्रताप सिंह को राज्य सभा प्रत्याशी बनाया। देवेंद्र प्रताप सिंह ने आज विधानसभा में अपना नामंकन दाखिल किया। इस दौरान सीएम साय समेत मंत्रिमंडल मौजूद रहा। बताया जा रहा है कि राज्यसभा सीट के लिए कोई भी प्रत्याशी मैदान में नहीं उतर रहे हैं, तो ऐसे में…

[mhlivenews]

अशोक चव्हाण, मेधा कुलकर्णी आणि अजित गोपछडे यांना भाजपकडून राज्यसभेची उमेदवारी

मुंबई : भारतीय जनता पक्षाने आगामी राज्यसभा निवडणुकीसाठी त्यांच्या उमेदवारांची नावे जाहीर केली आहेत. भाजपमध्ये प्रवेश केल्याच्या २४ तासांनंतर अशोक चव्हाण यांना लगेचच राज्यसभेची उमेदवारी देण्यात आली आहे. त्याचबरोबर मेधा कुलकर्णी आणि अजित गोपछडे यांनाही राज्यसभेची लॉटरी लागलेली आहे. दुसरीकडे विद्यमान केंद्रीय मंत्री नारायण राणे यांचा पत्ता मात्र भाजपने कापलेला आहे. भाजपचे सरचिटणीस विनोद तावडे तसेच…

[banglakhobor]

হুইল চেয়ারে বসেই রাজ্যসভায় মনমোহন, ‘প্রভুকে বলুন দেখে শিখতে’, BJP-র শ্লেষের পাল্টা কংগ্রেস

নয়াদিল্লি: ইতিহাস অন্তত তাঁর প্রতি সদয় হবে বলে মন্তব্য করেছিলেন একসময়। আজও জাতীয় রাজনীতিতে তাঁর সেই উক্তি ঘুরেফিরে আসে বার বার। মণিপুর হিংসা, দিল্লিতে আমলা নিয়োগ সংক্রান্ত বিল নিয়ে যখন উত্তাল সংসদ, সেই সময় সোমবার দেখা মিলল দেশের প্রাক্তন প্রধানমন্ত্রী মনমোহন সিংহের। অসুস্থ শরীর নিয়ে, হুইলচেয়ারে বসেই রাজ্যসভায় প্রবেশ করলেন নবতিপর মনমোহন। রাজ্যসভায় তাঁর এই উপস্থিতি সাড়া ফেলে দিয়েছে নেট দুনিয়ায়।…

[sivavakkiyar]

Bihar Deputy Chief Minister and senior BJP leader Vijay Kumar Sinha on Friday said that those who protest against the Waqf (Amendment) Bill would be treated as “traitors” and jailed.

“This is not Pakistan, this is Hindustan. Those who break the law will be arrested. This is the Narendra Modi government,” he said.

“The Bill is already passed in both Houses of Parliament. Those who oppose the Bill are traitors. Such people should be immediately arrested,” he added.

The Waqf Amendment Bill, 2024 passed in the Lok Sabha with 288 votes in favor and 232 against, and later in the Rajya Sabha with 128 supporting and 95 opposing it, despite widespread opposition.

[trueenewshub]

Homeless NDA Ministers

IMC WEB DESK NEW DELHI: Indian politics defines transition. Elections saw Modi as the PM heading NDA-led coalition government. Soon after, former Union Ministers asked to vacate their designated homes

NDA goes through changes

Indian politics witnessed weighty changes in 2024. On 7th June 2024, Narendra Modi confirmed the support of 293 MPs to Droupadi Murmu, the President of India. This marked Modi’s third term as Prime Minister and his first-time heading NDA-led coalition government with the Telugu Desam Party of Andhra Pradesh and Janata Dal (United) of Bihar emerging as two primary alliances.

A noticeable step taken by the Directorate of Estates (DoE) under the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) surely makes up for a sweeping swap!

DoE served a notice to few of the former Union Ministers in Indian Politics to vacate their official accommodation in Delhi’s Lutyens’ by 10 July as requests for accommodation pour in from newly appointed ministers.

All Union ministers and ministers of state (MoS) in Indian politics are entitled to a ‘Type VIII’ bungalow in Delhi’s Lutyens’. Former ministers have to vacate such an accommodation when they lose their ministerial berth, according to the DoE rules.

NDA-led coalition government have removed thirty-seven formers ministers in from Narendra Modi’s Union Council of Ministers. Indian politics stands synonymous to shifting gears.

Significant leaders in Indian politics namely Smriti Irani, Arjun Munda, R.K Singh, Niranjan Jyoti, Sanjeev Balyan, and Rajeev Chandrashekhar, lost in the recently concluded Lok Sabha elections. Others, such as Anurag Thakur, Narayan Rane, and Parshottam Rupala, won but did not get a ministerial berth this time. Some, such as Meenakshi Lekhi, did not get a ticket to contest the polls as the BJP replaced them with new faces. When the nation asks what is politics, well this is the face of real Indian Politics.

The DoE notice will be followed by a show cause notice eventually leading to an eviction notice.

Indian politics is often referred as the dance of democracy! While few ministers might still be showing unwillingness to vacate, there are others who have been upfront in changing their designated accommodation.

Former Education minister Ramesh Pokhriyal Nishank, who was served with an eviction notice by the Directorate of Estates recently, has also conveyed that he would be vacating the 27, Safdarjung Road bungalow.

Lutyens-Landmark in Indian Politics

Spread across an area of 23.60sqkm, The Lutyens Bungalow Zone is home to the luminaries of Indian Politics as well as high-net-worth individuals with about 3000 government-owned bungalows.

Serving NDA Union ministers were eligible for accommodation as allotted by the DoE. House committees of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha secretariats are the competent authorities to allot accommodation to MPs.

Members are entitled to a licence-fee free flat or hostel accommodation throughout their term of office.

Members are entitled to water supply without payment of charges up to 4000 kl per annum. They are eligible for electricity up to 50,000 units (25,000 units measure on light meter and 25,000 units on power meter or pooled together) per annum beginning from January 1 every year.

Other facilities include- washing of sofa covers and curtains every three months. Furniture within the monetary ceiling of Rs 60,000 in respect of durable furniture.

They are also allowed for a 25 per cent remission in the rent on account of any improvement or addition made to it or any additional service provided thereto by way of furniture, electrical equipment and other services.

Editor’s Note

Around 50 former union ministers and MPs from the last Lok Sabha have been sent notice by DoE to vacate their official accommodation. Home is always closest to ones heart and when it is in the poshest locality of the capital and earned through valid eligibility, the address caries a myriad of meaning for the resident. Apparently it is just might be a regular governmental procedure but delving deep, slight feeling uprootedness might haunt souls of Indian politics.

[cyndaquillt]

I'm sorry to bother you but all the elections stuff is really confusing me and i don't know what's happening

I'm not at the age of voting but will be by the time of the next elections

Again sorry to be a bother

Not a bother at all! And good on you for wanting to learn about this stuff already! The more informed you are by the time you are of voting age, the more informed of a decision you can make 🙂

Full disclosure, I'm not a social scientist or anything, just an average Indian citizen/voter with some academic expertise (not in this field). If someone reading all this finds something wrong, please feel free to point it out, preferably politely.

TL;DR : Indian parliamentary system is built to thrive on diverse viewpoints representative of its people. An attempt to smooth out dissensions and differences without healthy discussion goes against a democratic system. What we are happy about this week is election of a healthy opposition and a coalition that has the potential of keeping power concentration into one hands in check.

This is a bit of an expansive topic but I'm gonna break down certain key terms that you're gonna hear a lot in the news or other election commentary in the next few days. I'm not sure how much of a background knowledge you already have, so this is super long and detailed. Sorry about that in advance! Take your time reading this, or use it as a reference. Up to you! Follow up questions are more than welcome.

The Indian Parliament: The Indian Parliament is split into two houses, the Lower House or the Lok Sabha/House of the People, and the Upper House or the Rajya Sabha/Council of States. Lok Sabha members are appointed through elections while Rajya Sabha members are selected by the State Legislative Assemblies (Vidhan Sabha) and the President. When a new law is proposed as a bill or an ammendment to the constitution is proposed, it must pass through BOTH the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha.

The Lok Sabha: Lok Sabha has a total of 543 seats, representing 543 electoral constituencies throughout the country. Note that these 543 constituencies aren't exactly based on existing district divisions (eg: The Ayodhya district in UP is in the Faizabad constituency). Constituencies are split by population density. This means a region with more people will have more seats/stronger voice in the Lok Sabha. As a result, the largest state by area, Rajasthan has 25 seats in the Lok Sabha, while the most densely populated state of Uttar Pradesh has 80 seats in the Lok Sabha despite being the 4th largest state in the country. Also means if a political party bags UP, it gives them a huge leg up in winning Lok Sabha elections. To form a government, a political party or a group of political parties (a coalition) needs to have majority in the Lok Sabha. This mean winning over 272 seats or in other words, winning majority votes in 272 or more constituencies. Lok Sabha elections happen every 5 years, and the one that just happened, was a Lok Sabha election.

Important parties and alliances to keep in mind while parsing the news and comments are :

Bharatiya Janta Party (BJP): The ruling party that formed the government in the past two Lok Sabha terms (10 years). Note that in the 2014 and 2019 elections, BJP won a majority without forming an alliance with any other party. BJP's core politics are right-wing, which typically translates to capitalism, socially conservative, and maintaining class hierarchy as a form of order and structure in society.

Indian National Congress (INC or Congress): The main opposition party against the BJP. Indian National Congress's politics are liberal/center. While their polities don't entirely dismantle class/caste divide, they don't entirely aim to privatize sectors or take capitalism as the end all be all.

National Democratic Alliance (NDA): BJP-led coalition that secured majority in Lok Sabha elections and will form the government for the upcoming election term.

Indian National Development Inclusive Alliance (INDIA): Congress led coalition which didn't get the majority, but did secure 232 out of the 543 seats in the Lok Sabha. Even though those that are part of the INDIA coalition won't be forming the government, they will be present in the Lok Sabha as the elected representative of their respective constituency to voice their opinion on any motion that passes through the Lok Sabha.

Janta Dal (United) or JD(U): A political party from Bihar led by Nitish Kumar. JD(U) is currently part of the NDA, however JD(U) joined NDA pretty much right before the elections. As a matter of fact, Nitish Kumar has a tendency to switch sides depending on what he thinks would ensure his power and position. In 2014, when it became apparent that BJP was aiming for a Modi-led government and that Nitish, as someone who is not formally in BJP, didn't stand a chance of even being a cabinet minister, much less the Prime Minister, Nitish left NDA. However, back then, BJP managed to get a clear majority and Nitish's pullback didn't have weight. However, with JD(U) winning 12 seats in this election and BJP having to rely on a coalition government, Nitish's pullback has weight. At the time of writing this, word on the street is Nitish is sticking with the NDA and has made demands for 2 cabinets being handed over to JD(U) (See below cut for info on what is a cabinet).

Telugu Desam Party or TDP: Led by Chandrababu Naidu, TDP is a party with a stronghold in the states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. Currently also in the NDA coalition, TDP managed to win 16 seats in Andhra Pradesh. While Chandrababu Naidu isn't as much of a flip-flopper as Nitish, he has been fairly outspoken against the Modi government in the past. That being said, word on the street is also that Naidu garu may have been offered the position of the Lok Sabha Speaker (as in the person who mediates Lok Sabha discussions) and to also assign 2 cabinet berths to TDP in exchange for their continued support of NDA.

Other notable parties and names:

- DMK : Won 22 seats in Tamil Nadu. Is in the INDIA coalition/opposition. Led by M. K. Stalin.

- AITC or TMC: Won 29 seats in West Bengal. Is in the INDIA coalition/opposition. Led by Mamata Banerjee.

- SP : Won 37 seats in Uttar Pradesh. Is in the INDIA coalition/opposition. Led by Akhilesh Yadav.

All in all, the Indian parliamentary system allows for diverse voices and points of view to be a part of the discussion regarding national policies and lawmaking, even if the said voice doesn't make the ruling government. Something also to keep in mind about Indian politicians specifically is that they rarely think about public welfare and rather prioritize their personal hold on power. None of them are above the other when it comes to scheming on how to maintain power and these schemes often involve tactics to deflect their accountability towards the people.

In its decade long term, BJP as a ruling party has invested on multiple levels to maintain a one-man stronghold. I want to keep this answer objective and won't comment on any specific ruling. However, know that a one-man stronghold and a weak opposition defeats the purpose of the parliament and the constituencies. What most people are celebrating today is having a healthy opposition in place in addition to a coalition which would be a sort of check against power being concentrated into one person's hand.

When you vote in the next election, keep in mind that Indian politicians aren't like bands or artists you should root for. What you will be electing them to are positions of public service. Their priority is power and YOUR vote helps them have that. You are not answerable for their loss, THEY are answerable to YOU.

Also whoever you elect to the Lok Sabha is among the candidates in your constituency. A random schmuck from South Delhi who voted for BJP didn't vote for Modi, they voted for Ramvir Singh Bidhuri, the BJP candidate running from South Delhi. You could make the argument 'they voted for Modi Sarkar!' but the real, flesh and blood person that vote put in the parliament was not Narendra Modi, it was Ramvir Singh Bidhuri. Only people in Varanasi could vote directly for Modi because he contested from there. Had Modi lost the Varanasi seat, he wouldn't have been a member of the Lok Sabha. In which case, even if BJP or NDA made the government, Modi would have to become a part of the Lok Sabha or the Rajya Sabha in the next six months to be chosen as the Prime Minister. Long story short, learn more about the constituency you are in, the candidates and parties in that constituency, the demographic of your community, the problems it faces, and in light of all of that, who is the best candidate to represent your community's voice in the Lok Sabha.

Adding an additional note cabinets, but I think that's a little tangential so it's under the cut. Again, follow up questions more than welcome. Hope this helps you make some sense of the mess that is Indian electoral politics!

Cabinets and Socialism: A Cabinet Minister assumes leadership of one of the 53 ministries within the government. Most countries around the world, regardless of their government system, have a similar structure. Though, I do want to point out that India is a Socialist Republic. What this means, is that there are entire sectors that are folded into a centralized, government funded cabinet as opposed to a third party, like a private company, being responsible for it. Indian Railways are a great example for this. From literally manufacturing trains to operating railway stations to laying down rail lines to issuing tickets, the Ministry of Railway is responsible for all of it. While Indian Railways do have subdivisions to handle different aspects, the Minister of Railways is in-charge of the management of ALL of those subdivisions. There are also sectors like Aviation or Telecom where while the government doesn't own ALL airlines or telecom companies, the government does have it's own public funded unit (Air India in case of aviation and BSNL and MTNL in case of Telecom) and there are cabinet ministers who oversee the management of these units in addition to laying out guidelines and regulations which the entire sector has to follow.

Socialist structures with their govt centralized system help regulate cost and keep cost inflation in check because the purpose of a cabinet that runs on government money is public service, not profit margin (eg: general compartment train tickets are affordable and have been affordable for a long time). In the meantime, privatization of sectors may increase efficiency of a service (eg: Ministry of External Affairs outsourcing passport services to TCS has been a huge success), it may also drive cost inflation, unless checked on by the ministry responsible for the third party contract. We will find out who in the NDA will lead which cabinet on June 8.

[rightnewshindi]

वक्फ बिल 2024: लोकसभा में आज होगी बड़ी जंग, NDA बनाम INDIA गठबंधन, जानें कौन किसके साथ?

Delhi News: आज, 2 अप्रैल 2025 को लोकसभा में वक्फ (संशोधन) विधेयक 2024 पेश होने जा रहा है, जिसे लेकर सियासी माहौल गरमा गया है। यह बिल न सिर्फ वक्फ बोर्ड के ढांचे में ��दलाव की बात करता है, बल्कि इसे लेकर सत्ताधारी एनडीए और विपक्षी इंडिया गठबंधन के बीच तीखी टक्कर की उम्मीद है। लोकसभा स्पीकर ओम बिरला ने इस पर 8 घंटे की चर्चा का समय तय किया है, जिसमें सत्तापक्ष को 4 घंटे 40 मिनट और विपक्ष को 3 घंटे 20…

[talphaend]

Indian Politics: A Dynamic Democracy Navigating Challenges and Aspirations

India, the world’s largest democracy, boasts a vibrant yet complex political landscape shaped by its diversity, historical legacy, and evolving socio-economic priorities. Governed by a parliamentary system enshrined in its 1950 Constitution, Indian politics reflects both democratic ideals and persistent challenges, from corruption to identity-based divisions. This essay explores the structure, key players, contemporary issues, and future prospects of Indian politics in 2025.

1. Political Framework and Democratic Structure

India operates as a federal parliamentary republic, with power divided among the Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary. The President serves as the ceremonial head, while the Prime Minister leads the government. The bicameral Parliament consists of the Lok Sabha (Lower House) and Rajya Sabha (Upper House), representing the people and states, respectively .

The 2024 general elections saw Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) secure a third term, albeit reliant on alliances with regional parties like the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) and Janata Dal (United) . This underscores the growing influence of regional parties, which dominate states such as West Bengal (Trinamool Congress) and Tamil Nadu (DMK) .

2. Key Political Parties and Electoral Dynamics

India’s multi-party system features national and regional players. The BJP and Indian National Congress (INC) remain dominant nationally, while regional parties advocate state-specific agendas. The 2024 elections highlighted voter turnout at 67%, with youth and digital campaigns playing pivotal roles . However, challenges like electoral fraud allegations and the criminalization of politics persist, with many legislators facing criminal charges .

The BJP’s consolidation since 2014 has reshaped politics, emphasizing Hindu nationalism, economic reforms, and centralization. Critics argue this has marginalized minorities and weakened federalism, while supporters credit it with infrastructure growth and global stature .

3. Challenges in Indian Politics

A. Corruption and Governance

Corruption remains systemic, exemplified by scandals like the 2G Spectrum scam. Initiatives like the Lokpal Act and digital governance (e.g., Digital India) aim to enhance transparency, yet implementation gaps endure .

B. Identity Politics

Caste and religion often dictate electoral strategies. The BJP’s policies, such as revoking Jammu and Kashmir’s autonomy (Article 370), have intensified debates on secularism and minority rights .

C. Security and Internal Conflict

The 2025 Pahalgam terror attack, attributed to Pakistan-based militants, reignited India-Pakistan tensions and scrutiny of intelligence failures . Meanwhile, Naxalite insurgencies in Chhattisgarh and ethnic violence in Manipur underscore internal security challenges .

D. Economic Disparities

Despite being a $3.7 trillion economy, wealth inequality and unemployment persist. Welfare schemes like MNREGA and PM-KISAN aim to alleviate poverty, yet informal sector workers (94% of the workforce) remain vulnerable .

4. Recent Developments and Policy Shifts

A. BJP’s Third Term Agenda

Modi’s 2024–2029 agenda focuses on “Atmanirbhar Bharat” (self-reliant India), defense modernization, and Hindu cultural revival. The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, sparked protests in West Bengal, reflecting tensions over religious property rights .

B. Foreign Policy and Global Partnerships

The 2025 U.S.-India COMPACT initiative strengthened defense and trade ties, including co-production of Javelin missiles and a $500 billion trade target by 2030 . India’s leadership in the G20 and Quad alliances underscores its rising global influence .

C. Social Reforms

The Women’s Reservation Bill (pending) and appointments like Rekha Gupta as Delhi’s Chief Minister signal incremental progress in gender representation .

5. The Road Ahead: Opportunities and Reforms

A. Youth and Digital Engagement

With 65% of the population under 35, youth-driven movements and digital platforms (e.g., MyGov) are reshaping political participation .

B. Judicial and Electoral Reforms

Calls to decriminalize politics and abolish sedition laws (IPC 124A) highlight the need for judicial accountability . The Election Commission’s use of EVMs and VVPATs aims to ensure fair elections .

C. Sustainable Development

Initiatives like the Green Hydrogen Mission and amendments to nuclear liability laws (CLNDA) aim to balance energy security and climate goals .

Conclusion

Indian politics, a tapestry of democracy and diversity, faces a critical juncture in 2025. While the BJP’s dominance reflects a shift toward majoritarianism, regional parties and civil society push for pluralism and equity. Addressing corruption, enhancing inclusivity, and fostering youth leadership will determine whether India realizes its potential as a global democratic exemplar. As historian Ramachandra Guha noted, India’s democracy is “a marathon, not a sprint”—a testament to its resilience amid evolving challenges .

References: Insights synthesized from constitutional frameworks , electoral dynamics , policy initiatives , and contemporary events .

[aadishworldblogs]

Jagdeep Dhankhar: India’s 14th Vice President and Champion of the Constitution

Jagdeep Dhankhar, the current Vice President of India, is a distinguished politician and lawyer known for his unwavering commitment to constitutional values. Born on 18th May 1951 in rural Rajasthan, Dhankhar’s early life was rooted in simplicity and education. He studied at Sainik School, Chittorgarh, earned a degree in Physics, and later pursued law at the University of Rajasthan.

Beginning his career as a successful legal practitioner, Dhankhar rose to prominence, practicing at the Rajasthan High Court and the Supreme Court of India. In 1990, he was designated a Senior Advocate by the Supreme Court. His political career started with his election to the 9th Lok Sabha in 1989 as a Janata Dal candidate. He later served as the Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs under Prime Minister Chandra Shekhar.

After a brief retreat from politics to focus on law, Dhankhar returned to public life with the BJP. In 2019, he was appointed Governor of West Bengal, where his assertive role and frequent clashes with the state government sparked significant controversy. Nevertheless, his supporters praised his defense of constitutional propriety.

Elected as India’s 14th Vice President in 2022, Dhankhar also serves as the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, where his legal acumen and parliamentary experience help guide legislative proceedings effectively. His leadership style is characterized by a strong defense of the Constitution, bridging judiciary and legislature, and advocating for rural empowerment.

While criticisms have emerged regarding his confrontations with state authorities, Dhankhar maintains his actions are constitutionally driven. His journey from a humble village background to one of the nation’s highest offices symbolizes resilience and dedication. Today, Jagdeep Dhankhar stands as a vital and assertive voice in India’s constitutional and political landscape.

Explore more:- https://aadishworld.com/jagdeep-dhankhar-indias-14th-vice-president/

[balkikhalnews]

Uproar In Rajya Sabha: BJP Condemns SP MP Ramji Lal Suman's Remark On Rana Sanga, Demands Apology

Last Updated:March 28, 2025, 13:18 IST BJP MPs were seen shouting slogans in Rajya Sabha and forced a 30-minute adjournment of proceedings as they condemned the SP MP’s statement. Uproar erupted in Rajya Sabha on Friday after BJP MPs demanded an apology from Samajwadi Party leader Ramji Lal Suman. (PTI photo) A massive uproar erupted in Rajya Sabha on Friday after BJP MPs condemned Samajwadi…

[mhlivenews]

भाजपकडून राज्यसभा उमेदवारीची लॉटरी, कोण आहेत डॉ. अजित गोपछडे?

Rajya Sabha Election : भाजपनं राज्यसभा निवडणुकीसाठी तीन उमेदवारांची नावं जाहीर केली आहेत. अपेक्षेप्रमाणं अशोक चव्हाण यांचं नाव जाहीर करण्यात आलं आहे. अजित गोपछडे यांचं नाव सर्वांसाठी आश्चर्यकारक ठरलं आहे.

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] Paromita Das New Delhi: Bharat’s legislative corridors recently echoed with both hope and controversy as the Waqf Amendment Bill passed through the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha on April 2nd and 4th, 2025. This legislative development, while primarily administrative in its intent, has unfolded amidst a storm of debate. The bill, tabled by Union Minister for Minority Affairs Kiren Rijiju, aims to bring clarity, transparency, and coordination to the administration of Waqf properties across Bharat. At its core, it proposes mechanisms to streamline management, enhance coordination between Waqf Boards and local authorities, and protect heritage and community interests. Yet, this legislation has also been labeled divisive, with opponents calling it discriminatory, while supporters laud it as overdue reform. It has also become a lightning rod for political narratives, misinformation, and communal insecurities. Understanding the multifaceted implications of the bill demands an in-depth look into its background, contents, and comparisons with global practices. Political Genesis and Legislative Journey The Waqf Amendment Bill was initially introduced in August 2023 by Kiren Rijiju, the Union Minister for Minority Affairs. It was soon referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) chaired by BJP MP Jagdambika Pal. After extensive consultations, the JPC recommended 14 amendments, which were incorporated into the final version of the bill. This parliamentary scrutiny was not merely a formality but an intensive national outreach involving close to one crore public memoranda and consultations with major Islamic organizations and legal experts. Key voices during this outreach included Darul Uloom Deoband, Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, and multiple Jamaat factions, reflecting a comprehensive engagement process. The committee’s findings, submitted in February 2024, paved the way for Cabinet approval and its eventual tabling and passage in Parliament. Objective and Scope of the Amendment One of the primary intentions of the bill is to modernize the Waqf management system. The focus lies on digitizing land records, preventing unauthorized encroachments, and ensuring that the revenues generated are used transparently for community welfare. Moreover, it attempts to regulate the claim of Waqf status on private and public properties—an issue that has led to several legal disputes and civic tension. Through statutory provisions, the bill empowers local authorities to challenge dubious land claims, thereby streamlining legal redress mechanisms. By enhancing the transparency and accountability of the Waqf Boards, the bill seeks to protect both donors’ intentions and public interest. The Backlash and Allegations of Bias Despite its stated goals, the bill has drawn criticism, primarily from opposition parties and segments within the Muslim leadership. They argue that it undermines minority rights and is part of a broader political agenda. Terms like “anti-Muslim” and “unconstitutional” have been used to describe the bill by its detractors, who see it as an infringement on religious autonomy and property rights. However, such narratives often overlook the widespread issues within the Waqf administration, including lack of transparency, unregulated claims on land, and mismanagement of funds—concerns that have long been highlighted even by members of the Muslim community. The opposition to the bill, therefore, appears to be fueled as much by electoral calculations and communal sensitivities as by genuine legal apprehensions. Global Precedents and Comparative Frameworks Contrary to claims that the Bharatiya amendment is an outlier, many Muslim-majority countries have integrated similar or even more stringent regulations concerning Waqf properties. In Saudi Arabia, for example, the General Authority for Awqaf (GAA) oversees the management and development of endowments under direct government supervision. This agency, formed in 2010, has legal and financial autonomy but remains under the strategic guidance of the Prime Minister.

The GAA has adopted a multi-pillar approach that includes institutional governance, investment, and regulatory frameworks. Notably, its alignment with the goals of Saudi Vision 2030 illustrates how Waqf properties can be used effectively for national development without compromising religious intent. In Singapore, all wakafs are strictly regulated under the Administration of Muslim Law Act 1966. The Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura (MUIS) registers and monitors every wakaf, requiring annual reports, financial statements, and even police access for legal inquiries. Trustees cannot be appointed without prior MUIS approval, thereby ensuring rigorous checks and balances. Turkey’s approach presents an even more aggressive stance, especially during the early Republican era. Waqfs were not only abolished or nationalized, but their revenues were channeled toward secular state institutions. The renaming of Waqf to “Foundation” under the Civil Code in 1926 symbolized a deliberate push to limit religious influence over public assets. Today, Turkey’s Directorate General of Foundations manages and restores remaining Waqf assets while promoting public welfare. In Egypt, Waqf properties have been under parliamentary control since 1924. While respecting traditional Islamic endowments, the Egyptian state has actively intervened in cases of legal ambiguity or misuse. Muhammad Ali’s policies even included reclaiming lands with dubious Waqf status. These international examples clearly demonstrate that Bharat’s Waqf Amendment Bill is not an exception. Rather, it aligns with global norms where religious endowments are harmonized with legal oversight and public accountability. A Step in the Right Direction—With Room for Dialogue While the Waqf Amendment Bill introduces much-needed reforms, the manner in which it was passed—amid loud political rhetoric and societal division—deserves scrutiny. Transparency in religious endowment management is essential, particularly when public welfare is involved. However, it’s equally important for the government to maintain open lines of communication with all stakeholders, especially marginalized communities. Legislative clarity, digitization of records, and removal of bogus claims are vital goals, but so is maintaining the delicate balance of constitutional rights and religious freedoms. Thus, while the bill is a progressive move, its success depends on thoughtful implementation, judicial safeguards, and inclusive governance. The Waqf Amendment Bill reflects a significant shift in how Bharat perceives and regulates religious endowments. Its passage should not be viewed through the narrow prism of religion or politics alone but as part of a broader movement towards institutional reform. By learning from international precedents and customizing solutions to suit local realities, Bharat can both preserve the sanctity of Waqf properties and ensure they contribute meaningfully to national development. In a country as diverse as Bharat, striking this balance will always be challenging—but that is precisely why it matters so much.           The post The Waqf Amendment Bill: A Controversial Yet Necessary Reform in Bharat’s Legal Landscape appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link