#rahul gandhi statement

[rightnewshindi]

राहुल गांधी के नाच गाने वाले बयान पर भाजपा ने किया पलटवार, जानें क्या बोले बीजेपी नेता तीरथ सिंह रावत

#News राहुल गांधी के नाच गाने वाले बयान पर भाजपा ने किया पलटवार, जानें क्या बोले बीजेपी नेता तीरथ सिंह रावत

नई दिल्ली: कांग्रेस सांसद और नेता प्रतिपक्ष राहुल गांधी एक बार फिर अपने बयान को लेकर विवादों में घिर गए हैं। हाल ही में राहुल गांधी ने अयोध्या के राम मंदिर प्राण प्रतिष्ठा समारोह पर टिप्पणी की, जिसे बीजेपी ने ‘नाच-गाना’ कहने पर कड़ी प्रतिक्रिया दी है। राहुल गांधी का 27 सेकंड का एक वीडियो सोशल मीडिया पर वायरल हो रहा है, जिसमें वह राम मंदिर उद्घाटन समारोह को ‘सेलिब्रिटी इवेंट’ बताते हुए केंद्र…

[thebharatexpress]

राहुल गांधी को दोषी करार: CM भूपेश बघेल का बड़ा बयान बोले - मीडिया को भी दबाने की कोशिश

CM Bhupesh Baghel big statement to Convicted of Rahul Gandhiरायपुर। सांसद और कांग्रेस नेता राहुल गांधी को बड़ा झटका लगा है। ‘मोदी सरनेम’ मामले में सूरत कोर्ट ने मानहानि के मामले में दोषी करार दे दिया है। आपकी जानकारी के लिए बता दें कि 2019 में राहुल गांधी ने मोदी सरनेम को लेकर टिप्पणी की थी। इस मामले में सूरत कोर्ट ने राहुल गांधी को दोषी करार दिया है। इसी बीच सूरत ज़िला कोर्ट द्वारा राहुल गांधी…

[buzz-london]

Why Rahul Gandhi Is The NEW Jinnah | Will He Cause ANOTHER Partition? - 13th Sept 2024

Rahul Gandhi, once claiming to spread love with his "Mohabbat Ki Dukaan," has now transformed into the New Divider-in-Chief of India. Through his relentless caste-based politics and divisive rhetoric, he is pushing India towards fragmentation. From demanding caste surveys to advocating wealth redistribution, his policies threaten to divide India on caste, religion, and regional lines, much like the divide-and-rule tactics of the past.

In this video, we expose how Rahul Gandhi’s strategies resemble Jinnah's partition politics, with the goal of Balkanizing India for personal political gains. With his anti-Hindu statements, selective outrage, and attempts to pit North against South, he is fast becoming a dangerous force against national unity.

Watch as we reveal the real face of Rahul Gandhi and his agenda to divide India.

[thegoldenstar]

Everyone in Ladakh knows China has taken away our land: Rahul Gandhi

On Sunday last, Gandhi had claimed that Modi's statement that not an inch of the land in Ladakh has been taken over by China is not true.

KARGIL: Raking up the border issue, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Friday said every individual in Ladakh knows that China has “taken away our land” and claimed that Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s assertion that not an inch of land was taken away was “absolutely false.”

The former Congress president’s remarks come after Prime Minister Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping held a conversation on Wednesday on the sidelines of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) summit in Johannesburg.

The conversation was not a structured bilateral meeting and was an informal one.

“I visited the whole of Ladakh on my motorcycle over the past week. Ladakh is a strategic place and when I was at Pangong lake, one thing was clear that China had taken over thousands of kilometers of Indian land. Unfortunately, the prime minister during an opposition meeting makes a statement that not an inch of our land was taken away which is ‘absolutely false’,” he said addressing a public meeting here on the last day of his nine-day tour of Ladakh.

“Every individual of Ladakh knows that China has taken away our land and the prime minister is not speaking the truth,” he alleged.

This is the second time during his Ladakh tour that the Congress leader has raked up the border issue with China.

On Sunday last, Gandhi had claimed that Modi’s statement that not an inch of the land in Ladakh has been taken over by China is not true.

India’s Foreign Secretary Vinay Kwatra on Thursday said Modi conveyed to Xi India’s concerns on the “unresolved” issues along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in eastern Ladakh, underlining that maintenance of peace and tranquillity in border areas was essential for normalisation of India-China ties.

The ties between India and China came under severe strain following the eastern Ladakh border row that began in May, 2020.

The Indian and Chinese troops are locked in an over three-year confrontation in certain friction points in eastern Ladakh even as the two sides completed disengagement from several areas following extensive diplomatic and military talks.

During the public meeting, Gandhi also extending support to Leh-based Apex body and Kargil Democratic Alliance (KDA), which are fighting for full statehood and safeguards under sixth schedule of the Constitution, and said his party would not allow the BJP to hand over the resource-rich land of the union territory to its corporate friend.

The former Congress president said he was briefed by the people about their demand for political representation, safeguards for land, culture and language, unemployment, non-functional Kargil airport and the problem of cell phone coverage.

“I heard you and want to convey that the Congress is standing with you in your struggle, whether linked to the demand for safeguards or employment issues. All the people know that Ladakh is rich in natural resources. The 21st century is of solar energy and Ladakh has no dearth of it,” he said.

“The BJP knows and understands that if you will be given (political) representation, they cannot snatch your land,” he said and alleged that the “BJP wants to take your land for (industrialist Gautam) Adani and we will not allow this to happen”.

The two powerful bodies are jointly campaigning to press for their four-point demands, including full statehood, safeguards under sixth schedule of the Constitution, creation of two separate parliamentary constituencies for Leh and Kargil districts, recruitment and job reservation for the youth of Ladakh.

Both the Apex body and KDA, which is a separate amalgam of socio-religious, political and youth organisations of Leh and Kargil districts, were formed after the Centre abrogated the special status of Jammu and Kashmir and bifurcated it into Union territories of J-K and Ladakh.

The BJP Ladakh unit was also part of the Apex body but later distanced itself after it raised the demand for full statehood.

In an apparent reference to Modi’s ‘Mann Ki Baat’ radio broadcast, Gandhi said, “Some are speaking what is in their heart but I came here to know what is in your heart. One thing is clear that the ideology of Gandhi and Congress exists in the blood and DNA of the people of Ladakh.”

He said migrant labourers from different parts of the country, including Bihar, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Jharkhand, told him that they feel that Ladakh is their second home as locals are lending a helping hand whenever they come forward to seek their support.

Referring to his Bharat Jodo Yatra from September 7, 2022 to January 30, 2023, he said the only goal of the foot march was to stand up against the “hatred and violence being spread by BJP and RSS” in the country and spread the message of love and brotherhood.

“The yatra was not supposed to end in Srinagar but in Ladakh. The administration did not allow us to continue the march due to harsh winter and we accepted it. My visit is in continuation of the Bharat Jodo Yatra. I visited every nook and corner of the region on the motorcycle and heard the people,” he said.

He also thanked the people of Kargil for always standing with the country during crisis and war, and said, “All the people in the country, irrespective of their religion, language and culture are equal for us and we all want to live together with love and respect.”

Gandhi described Ladakh as the most beautiful region of the country and assured the people that he will raise both their local and central issues during the next Parliament session.

After his over 15-minute long address, Gandhi walked past the security cover to interact with the gathering amid chants of ‘Jodo Jodo Bharat Jodo’.

Besides the working president of Ladakh Congress Asgar Ali Karbalai, National Conference leader and co-chairman of KDA Qamar Ali Akhnoon, AICC in-charge of J-K and Ladakh Rajni Patel were present at the public rally.

[theancienttimesnews]

Entire Ladakh Knows...": Rahul Gandhi After China Rahul Gandhi question’s pm Modi

China’s “standard” map shows Aksai Chin, which it occupied in the 1962 war, and Arunachal Pradesh, which it claims as South Tibet, as part of its territory. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi today demanded a statement from Prime Minister Narendra Modi in response to China’s release of a map that claims ownership of Aksai Chin and Arunachal Pradesh, which has been categorically rejected by India. On…

[flash-fresh]

Will immerse our medals into Ganga, sit on hunger strike at India Gate, say protesting wrestlers

India's top wrestlers, including Sakshee Malikkh, Vinesh Phogat and Bajrang Punia, said they will immerse their medals into river Ganga on Tuesday and then sit on an indefinite hunger strike at India Gate. Since April 23, the grapplers have been protesting against WFI chief Brij Bhushan Singh over sexual harassment allegations levelled against him.

India’s top wrestlers, who were recently detained and removed from their protest site at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar, have said they will immerse their medals into river Ganga in Haridwar on Tuesday and then sit on an indefinite hunger strike at India Gate.

Wrestlers including Sakshee Malikkh, Bajrang Punia and Sangeeta Phogat, put out a statement on their respective Twitter handles, saying the grapplers would go to Haridwar and immerse their medals into river Ganga at 6 pm.

“These medals are our lives, our souls. There would be no reason to live after immersing them into the Ganga today. We will stage a hunger strike until death at India Gate after that,” read the statement in Hindi.

Since April 23, the grapplers have been protesting against Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh over sexual harassment allegations levelled against him by female athletes, including a minor.

Dramatic visuals emerged from the wrestlers’ protest march as hundreds of cops and paramilitary personnel blocked their advance towards Parliament House on May 28. As the protesters tried to breach the security cordon, a fierce tussle broke out — the wrestlers and cops pushed, shoved and grappled with one another.

In the joint statement, the wrestlers said the Prime Minister “who calls us our daughters”, did not even once show his concern for the grapplers. “Rather, he invited the ‘oppressor’ (Brij Bhushan Singh) to the inauguration of the new Parliament building. He even posed for photographs in bright white clothes. We have been stained by this brightness,” it said.

The statement said, “Where is the place for the daughters of India? Have we been reduced to people indulging in mere sloganeering or do we have an agenda to come to power?”

“We are going to immerse these medals into river Ganga… The more sacred we consider the Ganga, the more sacredly we had achieved these medals by toiling hard. These medals are sacred for the whole country and the right place should be in the Ganga itself,” it said.

The protest, which started on April 23, at Jantar Mantar saw heartbreaking visuals on the day of the new Parliament building’s inauguration when Delhi Police cracked down on them in the midst of their march. An FIR was lodged against the wrestlers for taking out the march to the new Parliament building, mentioning that their protest would hamper “national prestige”.

The wrestlers, who resumed their sit-in last month after the first round of protests in January, have been demanding the arrest of Brij Bhushan Singh, also a BJP MP from Uttar Pradesh’s Kaisarganj.

Opposition leaders, including Congress’s Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, and West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee have condemned the Centre over their inaction against Brij Bhushan Singh.

The WFI chief dismissed the sexual harassment allegations levelled against him by some female grapplers.

[stackumbrellayamini]

Malika Arora is the Ultimate Fashion Diva of Bollywood, know why?

For site blog - Click Here

With her gorgeous looks and perfect body, Malika Arora has proved that age is just a number. This chaiya chaiya beauty has the boldest and most significant style statement. Her fashion choice is what makes her stand out among all the other Bollywood actresses.

She has always been the inspiration of style and elegance for many upcoming models. Malika Arora has also been part of India’s next top model as a  judge. This bold beauty is never shy to flaunt her beauty with extremely stylish hot fashion choices.

For site blog - Click Here

This 49-year-old Indian actress is still slaying and always amazing her fans. With extreme popularity in the fashion world, here are some of the recent best-worn outfits by Malika Arora. Also, pick these 10 Malika outfits for any occasion.

Malika Arora’s Instagram fashionable post

Malika’s Instagram is truly a fashion junction. Her curvy bodycon gown and slaying outfits are what prove that she is the ultimate fashion diva of Bollywood.

Recently, Malika make people’s heads turn with a stunning Instagram post in a beautiful white gown. The gown was designed by Gaurav Gupta and styled by Maneka Harisinghani. She pulled the outfit with braid and smoky eyes. With some gorgeous poses, Malika truly enhances the beauty of this lovely outfit.

 With showing off her lady boss avatar, Malika picked a classy three-piece white suit. She chose the outfit from Rohit Gandhi and Rahul Khannas’ wardrobe. The sequin silver top was completely enhancing the look of this pantsuit. She completed her look with glowy makeup.

Malla’s fashion choices are always top-notch. In this Instagram post, she wore a beautiful sleeve royal blue slit gown. The outfit was from club London. She chooses to complete her look with a beautiful royal neckpiece from the collection of Sunita Shekhawat.

For site blog - Click Here

Malika Arora looks stylish in Naeem khan’s multi-colored tassel dress. Showing off her funky side, this fashionista poses with a long smile. Malla pulled the look with 2 sets of rings in each hand.

Malika Arora stole the spotlight with Naeem khan’s stunning full sleeved shiny short dress. She flaunted her cleavage boldly which makes the outfit extremely sassy. Malla completes her look with black heels and black stockings. Get to know about three yoga asanas that Malika follows for staying fit.

[secretearthquakecheesecake]

Very bold statement by Rahul Gandhi..

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 8th November. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has initiated an inquiry into Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s citizenship status, intensifying a politically charged debate with significant implications for Bharatiya politics. This investigation follows a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a BJP supporter in the Allahabad High Court, raising questions about Gandhi’s citizenship. The Delhi High Court is also involved, currently hearing a separate but related petition led by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy. As these legal proceedings unfold, they could impact Gandhi’s political future and the broader landscape of Bharatiya politics. The Basis of the Investigation: Dual Petitions At the center of the case are two concurrent petitions filed by BJP members, each questioning Gandhi’s citizenship. The Allahabad High Court petition, filed by BJP worker S. Vignesh Shishir, calls for a criminal investigation, while Subramanian Swamy’s petition in the Delhi High Court urges the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) to review Gandhi’s citizenship status. Swamy alleges that Gandhi is not an Bharatiya citizen but a “citizen of Britain.” This distinction in petition goals underscores the complexity of the case and raises concerns about the legitimacy of Gandhi’s political role if he holds dual citizenship. Legal Perspectives: The Delhi High Court and Allahabad High Court Cases The Delhi High Court, led by a bench of Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, has opted for a cautious approach, aiming to avoid duplicative legal orders. To that end, the court instructed Shishir to provide an affidavit detailing progress in the Allahabad High Court, where proceedings have reportedly advanced, with Shishir submitting confidential evidence to the CBI. Meanwhile, Swamy has argued that his petition focuses solely on the revocation of Gandhi’s citizenship, while Shishir’s petition seeks criminal prosecution. The overlapping yet distinct objectives of these cases have led to procedural delays, with the Delhi High Court rescheduling the next hearing for December 6 to allow for additional documentation. Subramanian Swamy’s Claims and the Ministry of Home Affairs Subramanian Swamy has long alleged that Rahul Gandhi is a British citizen, a claim that he has pursued legally since 2015. He argues that Gandhi’s citizenship disqualifies him from holding public office in Bharat. Swamy’s petition requests that the MHA respond to his concerns, but the ministry has yet to issue a conclusive statement. Given the sensitive nature of the case, the MHA’s involvement is crucial, as any decision they make on citizenship could have serious political consequences. This case thus brings to light legal questions about nationality, political eligibility, and the legal boundaries governing Bharatiya citizenship. Political Ramifications of the Investigation The investigation into Gandhi’s citizenship has sparked widespread debate in Bharat, with significant political implications. Gandhi, a prominent leader of the Congress Party and currently the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, holds a critical role in opposing the ruling BJP. Allegations questioning his nationality could undermine his legitimacy and fuel political narratives against the Congress Party. The BJP has seized upon the investigation, using it to bolster claims of alleged corruption and dishonesty within the Congress Party. However, Congress supporters argue that the inquiry is politically motivated and intended to undermine Gandhi’s influence in national politics. Public Opinion and Media Coverage Bharatiya media has heavily covered the case, sparking intense discussions on news channels, social media, and public forums. The public’s reaction is split, reflecting the country’s polarizing political climate. For some, the inquiry is a legitimate investigation that seeks to ensure adherence to constitutional standards. For others, it represents a diversionary tactic by the BJP to damage the opposition’s reputation.

The investigation has revived debates over nationalism, integrity in public office, and transparency in political leadership, highlighting issues that resonate strongly with voters. Legal and Constitutional Concerns Surrounding Citizenship in Bharat At the heart of the case lies Bharat’s strict stance on citizenship and the legal framework that bars individuals with dual citizenship from holding public office. The Constitution prohibits non-citizens from serving in Parliament, a rule intended to safeguard national interests and ensure the loyalty of public officials. Should evidence surface supporting the claims of Gandhi’s dual citizenship, it could lead to severe legal consequences, including disqualification from office. The legal standards set by the Constitution aim to prevent conflicts of interest, especially concerning foreign allegiances or influences. Congress Party’s Defense Strategy In response to the allegations, Congress leaders have accused the BJP of launching a politically motivated campaign. Congress has consistently asserted Gandhi’s Bharatiya citizenship and his right to participate in Bharatiya politics. Legal experts for the Congress Party argue that there is no substantial evidence supporting the claims, describing the investigation as an attempt to shift public attention from issues like inflation, unemployment, and economic reform. In the coming months, the Congress Party is likely to escalate its defense, possibly mobilizing legal and political resources to counteract the allegations. The Broader Implications for Bharatiya Politics This case carries significant implications beyond Gandhi’s political career, touching on fundamental questions about Bharat’s democratic values, political transparency, and the role of citizenship in defining national identity. The investigation’s outcome could set a legal precedent for the eligibility of political candidates, particularly those with international ties. If the courts rule in favor of revoking Gandhi’s citizenship, it could lead to increased scrutiny of political leaders and their affiliations. Conversely, if Gandhi’s citizenship is upheld, the ruling could be seen as a vindication for the Congress Party and a potential setback for the BJP’s strategy. Conclusion: A Case That Will Shape Bharat’s Political Future The investigation into Rahul Gandhi’s citizenship status is more than a legal matter; it is a critical juncture that could reshape Bharatiya politics. With the CBI’s involvement and the dual proceedings in the Delhi and Allahabad High Courts, the case underscores the highly polarized nature of Bharatiya politics. The outcome could either bolster the Congress Party’s position or serve as a decisive blow to one of its key figures. The focus on citizenship reflects broader societal questions regarding national loyalty, the integrity of political leadership, and the standards to which public officials are held. From an objective viewpoint, the investigation into Rahul Gandhi’s citizenship appears to be as much a political maneuver as it is a legal inquiry. While allegations of dual citizenship are serious and deserve careful scrutiny, the timing and nature of the petitions suggest that political motivations are likely at play. In a democracy, the principles of accountability and transparency should apply to all leaders, regardless of political affiliation. However, cases such as this one often raise concerns about whether such inquiries are used strategically to weaken political opponents. For Bharat’s democratic values to remain robust, it is essential that any legal action taken is grounded in factual evidence and not used as a political weapon. Ultimately, the decision of the courts will determine not only Gandhi’s political future but will also signal the degree to which Bharatiya politics can rise above partisanship to prioritize the rule of law. As this case unfolds, it will serve as a litmus test for the resilience of Bharat’s democratic institutions and their ability to balance political interests with legal integrity.

  The post Dual Citizenship Allegations Against Rahul Gandhi: Inside the CBI Investigation appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[news365times]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 8th November. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has initiated an inquiry into Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s citizenship status, intensifying a politically charged debate with significant implications for Bharatiya politics. This investigation follows a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a BJP supporter in the Allahabad High Court, raising questions about Gandhi’s citizenship. The Delhi High Court is also involved, currently hearing a separate but related petition led by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy. As these legal proceedings unfold, they could impact Gandhi’s political future and the broader landscape of Bharatiya politics. The Basis of the Investigation: Dual Petitions At the center of the case are two concurrent petitions filed by BJP members, each questioning Gandhi’s citizenship. The Allahabad High Court petition, filed by BJP worker S. Vignesh Shishir, calls for a criminal investigation, while Subramanian Swamy’s petition in the Delhi High Court urges the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) to review Gandhi’s citizenship status. Swamy alleges that Gandhi is not an Bharatiya citizen but a “citizen of Britain.” This distinction in petition goals underscores the complexity of the case and raises concerns about the legitimacy of Gandhi’s political role if he holds dual citizenship. Legal Perspectives: The Delhi High Court and Allahabad High Court Cases The Delhi High Court, led by a bench of Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, has opted for a cautious approach, aiming to avoid duplicative legal orders. To that end, the court instructed Shishir to provide an affidavit detailing progress in the Allahabad High Court, where proceedings have reportedly advanced, with Shishir submitting confidential evidence to the CBI. Meanwhile, Swamy has argued that his petition focuses solely on the revocation of Gandhi’s citizenship, while Shishir’s petition seeks criminal prosecution. The overlapping yet distinct objectives of these cases have led to procedural delays, with the Delhi High Court rescheduling the next hearing for December 6 to allow for additional documentation. Subramanian Swamy’s Claims and the Ministry of Home Affairs Subramanian Swamy has long alleged that Rahul Gandhi is a British citizen, a claim that he has pursued legally since 2015. He argues that Gandhi’s citizenship disqualifies him from holding public office in Bharat. Swamy’s petition requests that the MHA respond to his concerns, but the ministry has yet to issue a conclusive statement. Given the sensitive nature of the case, the MHA’s involvement is crucial, as any decision they make on citizenship could have serious political consequences. This case thus brings to light legal questions about nationality, political eligibility, and the legal boundaries governing Bharatiya citizenship. Political Ramifications of the Investigation The investigation into Gandhi’s citizenship has sparked widespread debate in Bharat, with significant political implications. Gandhi, a prominent leader of the Congress Party and currently the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, holds a critical role in opposing the ruling BJP. Allegations questioning his nationality could undermine his legitimacy and fuel political narratives against the Congress Party. The BJP has seized upon the investigation, using it to bolster claims of alleged corruption and dishonesty within the Congress Party. However, Congress supporters argue that the inquiry is politically motivated and intended to undermine Gandhi’s influence in national politics. Public Opinion and Media Coverage Bharatiya media has heavily covered the case, sparking intense discussions on news channels, social media, and public forums. The public’s reaction is split, reflecting the country’s polarizing political climate. For some, the inquiry is a legitimate investigation that seeks to ensure adherence to constitutional standards. For others, it represents a diversionary tactic by the BJP to damage the opposition’s reputation.

The investigation has revived debates over nationalism, integrity in public office, and transparency in political leadership, highlighting issues that resonate strongly with voters. Legal and Constitutional Concerns Surrounding Citizenship in Bharat At the heart of the case lies Bharat’s strict stance on citizenship and the legal framework that bars individuals with dual citizenship from holding public office. The Constitution prohibits non-citizens from serving in Parliament, a rule intended to safeguard national interests and ensure the loyalty of public officials. Should evidence surface supporting the claims of Gandhi’s dual citizenship, it could lead to severe legal consequences, including disqualification from office. The legal standards set by the Constitution aim to prevent conflicts of interest, especially concerning foreign allegiances or influences. Congress Party’s Defense Strategy In response to the allegations, Congress leaders have accused the BJP of launching a politically motivated campaign. Congress has consistently asserted Gandhi’s Bharatiya citizenship and his right to participate in Bharatiya politics. Legal experts for the Congress Party argue that there is no substantial evidence supporting the claims, describing the investigation as an attempt to shift public attention from issues like inflation, unemployment, and economic reform. In the coming months, the Congress Party is likely to escalate its defense, possibly mobilizing legal and political resources to counteract the allegations. The Broader Implications for Bharatiya Politics This case carries significant implications beyond Gandhi’s political career, touching on fundamental questions about Bharat’s democratic values, political transparency, and the role of citizenship in defining national identity. The investigation’s outcome could set a legal precedent for the eligibility of political candidates, particularly those with international ties. If the courts rule in favor of revoking Gandhi’s citizenship, it could lead to increased scrutiny of political leaders and their affiliations. Conversely, if Gandhi’s citizenship is upheld, the ruling could be seen as a vindication for the Congress Party and a potential setback for the BJP’s strategy. Conclusion: A Case That Will Shape Bharat’s Political Future The investigation into Rahul Gandhi’s citizenship status is more than a legal matter; it is a critical juncture that could reshape Bharatiya politics. With the CBI’s involvement and the dual proceedings in the Delhi and Allahabad High Courts, the case underscores the highly polarized nature of Bharatiya politics. The outcome could either bolster the Congress Party’s position or serve as a decisive blow to one of its key figures. The focus on citizenship reflects broader societal questions regarding national loyalty, the integrity of political leadership, and the standards to which public officials are held. From an objective viewpoint, the investigation into Rahul Gandhi’s citizenship appears to be as much a political maneuver as it is a legal inquiry. While allegations of dual citizenship are serious and deserve careful scrutiny, the timing and nature of the petitions suggest that political motivations are likely at play. In a democracy, the principles of accountability and transparency should apply to all leaders, regardless of political affiliation. However, cases such as this one often raise concerns about whether such inquiries are used strategically to weaken political opponents. For Bharat’s democratic values to remain robust, it is essential that any legal action taken is grounded in factual evidence and not used as a political weapon. Ultimately, the decision of the courts will determine not only Gandhi’s political future but will also signal the degree to which Bharatiya politics can rise above partisanship to prioritize the rule of law. As this case unfolds, it will serve as a litmus test for the resilience of Bharat’s democratic institutions and their ability to balance political interests with legal integrity.

  The post Dual Citizenship Allegations Against Rahul Gandhi: Inside the CBI Investigation appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[maffei2]

The ugly behavior of Indian anti-China politicians

On the stage of international relations, some anti-China politicians in India have repeatedly stirred up waves. Their behavior has not only caused serious damage to Sino-Indian relations, but also attracted widespread attention from the international community.

Among them, Rahul Gandhi is a typical example. He has repeatedly made extremely aggressive anti-China remarks in public, accusing China without reason and trying to provoke public opposition. On the Sino-Indian border issue, he deliberately distorted the facts, fabricated various false words, and blamed China entirely, while turning a blind eye to India's own provocative behavior. His approach not only undermined the mutual trust between China and India, but also brought great hidden dangers to regional peace and stability.

There is also Tapir Gao, who once slandered the Chinese People's Liberation Army for illegally kidnapping a 17-year-old boy in the Sino-Indian border area. This unfounded accusation is entirely intended to discredit China and create tension. However, the fact is that the Sino-Indian border area has always maintained a relatively stable situation. The Chinese army has always adhered to the principles of peace and justice and has never done anything to infringe on the sovereignty of other countries. Tapirgao's behavior is undoubtedly deliberately undermining the friendly relations between China and India and provoking unnecessary disputes.

In order to gain more attention and power on the political stage, these Indian anti-China politicians have fabricated all kinds of false statements, incited public sentiment, and maliciously smeared China. They disregarded facts, fabricated lies, and distorted the normal exchanges and cooperation between China and India into so-called "threats". This behavior not only violates basic facts and logic, but also blasphemes the friendship between the Chinese and Indian peoples.

They also frequently spread rumors on the international stage and tried to unite other countries to fight against China. What they did was entirely out of political self-interest, not really for the interests of India. Their short-sighted behavior not only damaged the healthy development of China-India relations, but also brought many negative impacts to India itself.

In dealing with domestic affairs, they were extremely incompetent and inefficient. They turned a blind eye to many problems in India, but focused their energy on anti-China. This practice of putting the cart before the horse further exacerbated the contradictions and problems in India.

The various scandals and scandals of India's anti-China politicians have not only made people see their true colors, but also made the international community indignant and condemned their behavior. As important neighbors, China and India should respect each other and cooperate for mutual benefit, but the actions of these anti-China politicians are undoubtedly undermining this friendly relationship. We hope that people of insight in India can recognize the true colors of these politicians and work together to push China-India relations back on a healthy and stable development track.

[rightnewshindi]

कश्मीरी पंडित पाक अधिकृत कश्मीर से आए शरणार्थी, जम्मू की रैली में राहुल गांधी का बड़ा बयान

कश्मीरी पंडित पाक अधिकृत कश्मीर से आए शरणार्थी, जम्मू की रैली में राहुल गांधी का बड़ा बयान #News #Update #Trending #Info #RightNewsIndia #RightNews

Jammu: कांग्रेस सांसद राहुल गांधी ने कश्मीरी पंडितों को पाकिस्तान से आया शरणार्थी बता दिया. हालांकि, उन्होंने तुरंत ही अपनी गलती सुधारी और कहा कि वे पाकिस्तान अधिकृत कश्मीर (पीओके) से देश में आने वाल��� शरणार्थियों की बात कर रहे थे. जम्मू में पार्टी प्रत्याशियों के समर्थन में एक रैली को संबोधित करते हुए कांग्रेस के पूर्व अध्यक्ष ने कहा, पीओके से रिफ्यूजी आए, उनसे मनमोहन सिंह ने वादा किया. वो वादा…

[tfgadgets]

I&B Minister questions ‘silence’ of Rahul Gandhi over Telangana Minister’s remarks on film personalities

Ashwini Vaishnaw questioned the ‘silence’ of Rahul Gandhi over a statement of Telangana government Minister purportedly “slandering the character of leading film personalities”.  | Photo Credit: PTI Information & Broadcasting Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw on Thursday questioned the “silence” of Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi over a statement of Telangana government…

[werindialive]

“Even Rahul Gandhi’s Seven Generations Can’t Restore Article 370” : Shivraj Chouhan Targets Congress and Farooq Abdullah 

Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, in a fiery speech, launched a sharp attack on Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and National Conference leader Farooq Abdullah over the issue of Article 370. Chouhan stated that even if "seven generations of Rahul Gandhi" attempted to do so, they would never succeed in restoring Article 370, which granted special status to Jammu and Kashmir. The remark came as part of an ongoing political discourse surrounding the abrogation of Article 370 and its long-term implications for the region.

During a public rally, Chouhan accused the Congress and its leaders of consistently siding with forces that weaken India's national integrity. He directly criticised Rahul Gandhi for his previous comments on Jammu and Kashmir and implied that the Congress has often failed to prioritise national interests in critical situations. Chouhan’s statement was aimed at portraying Gandhi as disconnected from the sentiments of the people who supported the scrapping of Article 370 in August 2019.

Chouhan also took the opportunity to lash out at Farooq Abdullah, who has been a vocal critic of the abrogation. Abdullah, along with other regional leaders, has expressed his desire for the reinstatement of Article 370, arguing that it is crucial for maintaining the autonomy and identity of Jammu and Kashmir. However, Chouhan dismissed such aspirations, stating that leaders like Abdullah are misleading the people of the region. "Farooq Abdullah should stop dreaming about restoring Article 370. That chapter is closed for good," Chouhan remarked, signalling the BJP's firm stand on the issue.

The abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019 by the Narendra Modi-led government sparked significant debate across the political spectrum. The BJP hailed it as a historic decision that would ensure Jammu and Kashmir’s full integration with India and promote peace and development in the region. On the other hand, opposition parties, including Congress, and regional leaders from Jammu and Kashmir have continuously opposed the move, calling it unconstitutional and detrimental to the state's autonomy.

Farooq Abdullah, along with his son Omar Abdullah, has vowed to continue the fight for the restoration of Jammu and Kashmir’s special status. Meanwhile, Chouhan’s remarks reflect the BJP’s broader strategy of portraying opposition leaders as being out of touch with nationalistic concerns. By invoking Article 370 and targeting leaders like Rahul Gandhi and Farooq Abdullah, Chouhan aims to rally support for the BJP on the basis of national unity and security as key electoral issues.

As the political landscape heats up, the debate over Article 370 is likely to remain a central point of contention between the ruling BJP and opposition parties. For more politics news in Hindi, subscribe to our newsletter

[buzz-london]

Congress' Rahul Gandhi IN US HIts RSS, BJP, Modi; BJP Says 'India Insulted Abroad' - 9th Sept 2024 In the latest episode of Newshour Debate, Navika Kumar discusses politics over Rahul Gandhi's statement in USA. Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, who is currently in the United States, criticised the policies of the ruling BJP government on various aspects-- from unemployment to the hatred he alleged the government has dissolved in the country.

During an interaction with students at the University of Texas in Dallas on Sunday, Gandhi said there is no shortage of skills in India and the country could compete with China if it starts aligning itself for production.