#polyethoxylated-amine | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

blueweave8 · 2 years ago

Text

Agricultural Adjuvants Market Growth, Industry Trends, Report 2022-2028

A recent study conducted by the strategic consulting and market research firm, BlueWeave Consulting, revealed that the Global Agricultural Adjuvants market was worth USD 3.5 billion in the year 2021. The market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 4.3%, earning revenues of around USD 4.7 billion by the end of 2028. The Global Agricultural Adjuvants market is booming due to rising technical advancements in the agriculture and crop protection industries. Biotechnology advances and improved farming techniques drive agriculture adjuvant sales. In addition, the Market for agricultural adjuvants is expanding due to rising agrochemical demand. However, environmental concerns regarding petroleum oil-based adjuvants may act as a huge restraining factor for market growth.

Technological Advancements in Adjuvant and Increasing demand for Agrochemicals are driving the Market

The Market for adjuvants is experiencing positive growth due to rising technical advancements in the agriculture and crop protection industries. Agriculture adjuvant sales are being driven by advances in biotechnology, improved farming techniques, and changes in fertilizer company organizational structures, among other things. Manufacturers are concentrating on creating new formulations that mirror modifications in crop protection formulas. The market demand for agricultural adjuvant is anticipated to increase with the modernization of adjuvant technology that is more tailored to particular crops. Another important element that is projected to provide new chances is the industrialization trend toward developing enhanced adjuvant molecules and formulation technology that includes multi-component and multi-functional adjuvants with various agrochemical compatibility.

The Market for agricultural adjuvants is expanding due to rising agrochemical demand. Agrochemicals are substances used in agriculture, such as plant growth hormones, insecticides, and fertilizers. An auxiliary that boosts an agrochemical's potency is known as an agricultural adjuvant. Around 2 million tons of pesticides were utilized globally, according to various studies. By 2020, there will be 3.5 million tons of pesticides used worldwide. Consequently, the Market for agricultural adjuvants is expanding as a result of the rising demand for agrochemicals.

Request for Sample Report @ https://www.blueweaveconsulting.com/report/agricultural-adjuvants-market/report-sample

Environmental Concerns Regarding Petroleum Oil-Based Adjuvants is the key Challenge in the Operation of adjuvants in the Industry

Government and organization-imposed regulations oversee the agricultural adjuvants market. Many businesses in nations like France and Germany struggle with creating, manufacturing, and marketing their crop protection goods. The main issue facing the adjuvants market is environmental concerns regarding petroleum oil-based adjuvants. For example, according to the World Bank, pesticides caused a 30% decline in honeybee populations in the US, and atrazine-contaminated water has been shown to transform male tadpoles into female frogs in lab experiments. Tadpoles and frogs both suffer natural toxicity from polyethoxylated alkyl amine surfactants. Environment exposure can have an impact on non-target organisms, some of which may even be responsible for chronic human disorders, thereby acting as a challenge for the agricultural adjuvants market.

In-formulation Category Had the Biggest Market Share in Global Agricultural Adjuvants Adoption Stage Segment

Based on the adoption stage, the Market is segmented into in-formulation and tank-mix. Due to their ease of use and lower initial investment required by farmers, in-formulation products have dominated the agricultural adjuvants industry. This is because farmers find these products to be both convenient and cost-effective. The rapid expansion of this market sector is also related to consumers' rising desire for agrochemicals, which are applied directly to crops without the need for further chemical additions. However, producers are investing in creating cutting-edge tank-mix goods for industrialized nations due to the growing development of several adjuvants. Consequently, it is anticipated that the tank-mix Market will experience the fastest growth over the next years. Based on formulation, the Market is segmented into suspension and emulsifiable concentrates. Other than suspension formulations, emulsifiable concentrates are among the most widely used formulations for crop protection treatments worldwide.

Region Insights

North America region is estimated to command the largest share of the global agricultural adjuvants market, followed by Asia Pacific. The continuing loss of arable land, expanding population, and rise in demand for food of a certain standard of quality are responsible for the majority of its share. Most crops thrive in the climate of the Asia Pacific region, such as sugarcane, wheat, and rice. This region is home to about 60% of the world's population; thus, demand is high. However, due to the region's rapid urbanization and industrialization, the amount of arable land is also alarming. Hence, farmers are under pressure to enhance their productivity. As a result, agricultural adjuvants contribute to agrochemicals' effectiveness while helping to increase crop yields.

Impact of COVID-19 on Global Agricultural Adjuvants Market

The coronavirus's adverse impacts have impacted the demand for agrochemicals in 2020. Numerous international organizations have said that the current state of the world economy is the most challenging since the financial crisis, which is preventing the Market for agricultural adjuvants from expanding amid the COVID-19 epidemic. Due to shifting trade restrictions and a lack of raw materials needed for manufacturing fertilizers and adjuvants on domestic markets, many firms suffered losses. This led to an imbalance between the Market's supply and demand for fertilizers, which caused price fluctuations in food items. But a market recovery is anticipated for 2022–2023. As local firms are supported by governments around the world, economies are rebounding. The agricultural adjuvant market is anticipated to grow.

Competitive Landscape

Key players operating in the Global Agricultural Adjuvants market are Clariant AG, Solvay, Corteva Agriscience, The Dow Chemical Company, Huntsman International LLC., Evonik Industries AG, Ingevity, Nufarm Limited, Croda International PLC, BASF SE, Miller Chemical & Fertilizer, LLC., Helena Chemical Company, WinField United, Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC, Stepan Company, Bayer Cropscience, Attune Agriculture, Garrco Products, Inc., Drexel Chemical Company, Loveland Products Inc. and other prominent players. In order to expand their positions in the Market and increase their market shares, the players often employ new product releases, innovation, distribution network expansion, joint ventures, and mergers & acquisitions.

BlueWeave Consulting & Research Pvt. Ltd

+1 866 658 6826 | +1 425 320 4776 | +44 1865 60 0662

[email protected]

#Agricultural Adjuvants Market

0 notes

ajklegal · 4 years ago

Text

Roundup Lawyer

Roundup Injury Lawyer

Roundup (herbicide)

Roundup is the brand name of a systemic, broad-spectrum glyphosate-based herbicide originally produced by Monsanto, which Bayer acquired in 2018.[2]Glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide in the United States.[3] As of 2009, sales of Roundup herbicides still represented about 10 percent of Monsanto's revenue despite competition from Chinese producers of other glyphosate-based herbicides.[4] The overall Roundup line of products, which includes genetically modified seeds, represented about half of Monsanto's yearly revenue.[5] The product is marketed to consumers by Scotts Miracle-Gro Company.[6]

Monsanto developed and patented the glyphosate molecule in the 1970s, and marketed it as Roundup from 1973. It retained exclusive rights to glyphosate in the US until its US patent expired in September 2000; in other countries the patent expired earlier. The Roundup trademark is registered with the US Patent Office and still extant. However, glyphosate is no longer under patent, so similar products use it as an active ingredient.[7]

The main active ingredient of Roundup is the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate. Another ingredient of Roundup is the surfactant POEA (polyethoxylated tallow amine).

Monsanto also produced seeds which grow into plants genetically engineered to be tolerant to glyphosate, which are known as Roundup Ready crops. The genes contained in these seeds are patented. Such crops allow farmers to use glyphosate as a post-emergence herbicide against most broadleaf and cereal weeds.

Source: Wikipedia

Do you qualify for a roundup lawsuit?

Bayer Monsanto’s Roundup is the highest-selling and most widely used herbicide in the world. In the 1970s, Monsanto discovered that glyphosate had herbicidal properties and soon began marketing the substance as Roundup. Currently, there are more than 9,300 lawsuits pending against Monsanto. Victims and their families are suing because the active ingredient in the company’s product caused them or their loved ones to develop Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. The cases note that Monsanto’s cover up the risks endangered the lives of those who work with the product. If you or a loved one developed Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) after working in the farming, or gardening industries, contact our firm today. Because burn injury cases are complex and timing is so critical, it is important to have the right legal representation by your side. At AJK Legal, the right team has the experience necessary to successfully pursue your case in court. Our Roundup Injury Lawyer have helped recover millions of dollars for injured consumers and victims!

#Roundup Lawyer #Roundup Injury Lawyer #ajklegal

0 notes

genefish · 8 years ago

Text

New in Pubmed: Sub-lethal effects of a glyphosate-based commercial formulation and adjuvants on juvenile oysters (Crassostrea gigas) exposed for 35days.

Sub-lethal effects of a glyphosate-based commercial formulation and adjuvants on juvenile oysters (Crassostrea gigas) exposed for 35days.

Mar Pollut Bull. 2017 Feb 12;:

Authors: Séguin A, Mottier A, Perron C, Lebel JM, Serpentini A, Costil K

Abstract Glyphosate-based herbicides include active matter and adjuvants (e.g. polyethoxylated tallow amines, POEAs). In addition to a previous investigation on the effect of glyphosate on oysters, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of sub-chronic exposures (35days) to three concentrations (0.1, 1 and 100μgL(-1)) of Roundup Express® (REX) and POEAs on oysters belonging to the same age group. Low mortality rates were calculated, and only few significant differences (i.e. shell length) between exposure conditions were observed at a given date. However, when comparing the biomarker's temporal variations, some different patterns (e.g. condition index, reproduction, parameters of oxidative stress) were observed depending on the molecules and concentrations. These results suggest that a longer exposure to an environmental concentration (0.1μgL(-1)) of REX and POEAs could induce harmful effects on oysters.

PMID: 28202277 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

from pubmed: crassostrea gigas http://ift.tt/2lpsKFk via IFTTT

#IFTTT #pubmed

0 notes

krsnan-blog · 6 years ago

Photo

GMO! AWAKE AMERICA WATCH FREEDOM TO FASCISM PON YOUTUBE AWAKE! AND WHAT ELSE IS THE GOVERNMENT HIDING FROM US? PERHAPS NASA IS A HOAX? CHECK OUT THIS FENOMENALE INSTA POSTS...BUZZ ALDREN ADMITTING THERE HAS NEVER!!!!BEEN A NASA MOON LANDING! WOW! https://www.instagram.com/p/BmBwsfoAsEj/?utm_source=ig_share_sheet&igshid=1oiz07ifftt2 There’s also evidence that GMOs share some of the responsibility. A Russian study on hamsters showed that consumption of GM soybeans tended to slow their sexual maturation process and completely eliminated their ability to reproduce within just a few generations. An Austrian study uncovered similar infertility in third-generation mice that consumed GM corn. That’s not all. Many of the herbicides and pesticides used in conventional farming are “environmental estrogens.” This means that their molecules mimic the activity of the human hormone estrogen, too much of which is not good for men or women; it also affects testosterone levels. GMO crops have exacerbated this problem. According to an animal study published in the journal Toxicology in Vitro, glyphosate (the active ingredient in Roundup, Bayer/Monsanto’s widely used pesticide) often leaves a residue on Roundup Ready crops—and this affects testosterone levels and men’s sperm counts. It is actually toxic to testicle cells, and significantly lowers testosterone synthesis. Consider, too, that recent research has found that “inert” ingredients in herbicides can be more toxic than the active ingredients: POEA (polyethoxylated tallow amine), an “inert” ingredient in Roundup, has been found to be 1,200 to 2,000 times more toxic to human cells than glyphosate. AWAKE AMERICA WATCH FREEDOM TO FASCISM PON YOUTUBE!AWAKE! INFERTILITY! Common chemicals are causing sperm deformity and decreased sperm counts. Action Alert! A new study suggests that when a mother is exposed to endocrine-disrupting chemicals during pregnancy, her son and the son’s future generations may suffer from decreased fertility. This is the latest among a mounting body of scientific evidence that links these common chemicals—found in a wide variety of products including plastics, pesticides, PVC piping, cosmetics, med https://www.instagram.com/p/BqsXUooAx0Z/?utm_source=ig_tumblr_share&igshid=v77o97twr9u6

0 notes

jakehglover · 7 years ago

Text

Boiled Frogs and the Pesticide Time Bomb

By Dr. Mercola

Corn and soybean seeds colored red and blue, respectively, have become an all-too-common sight on U.S. farms. The seeds are given a colorful hue because they’ve been treated with neonicotinoid pesticides, and the coloring is one of the only ways to tell them apart from their untreated, yellow counterparts. In 2018, nearly every field corn seed sown in the U.S. contained the insecticides, along with about half of soybeans and most of the cotton.1

(For clarification, there are three kinds of corn: field, sweet and popcorn. Popcorn is never genetically modified, 2 although some brands may include GMO Ingredients, for example, if you purchase preflavored bags. Sweet corn is that tasty corn you eat right on the cob every summer, and it’s moist when it’s harvested,3 unlike field corn, which is left on the stalk longer so it can dry out in preparation for processing. Field corn is then used to make processed food products and animal feed.)

According to John Tooker, associate professor of entomology at Pennsylvania State University, “ … [T]hese insecticides will be used across at least 150 million acres of (field corn) cropland, an area about the size of Texas.”4

While some attention has been given to neonicotinoids’ potential role in bee decline, Tooker believes the chemicals are having an even greater pernicious influence on insects, such that entire ecosystems could be in jeopardy. What’s more, neonicotinoids are only one type of agricultural chemical that’s being used in excess while the environmental consequences begin to unfold all-around us.

Neonicotinoids Devastating the Environment While Reducing Farmers’ Crop Yields

In recent years, the acreage of crops treated with neonicotinoids has skyrocketed, as has the volume used. From 2011 to 2014, Tooker says, seed suppliers doubled the amount of insecticide applied to each seed. During that time, the number of pests have stayed largely the same, as they have since the 1990s, when only 35 percent of U.S. corn acres and 5 percent of soybean acres were treated with neonicotinoids.

Even at those levels, “pest populations did not cause economically significant harm very often,” according to Tooker. “This suggests that it is not necessary to treat hundreds of millions of acres of crops with neonicotinoid seed coatings.” Further, while the chemicals are very effective at killing insects, this is part of the problem.

Not every insect is a pest; in fact, many are beneficial. Research by Tooker and colleagues found that planting neonicotinoid seeds kills off insects that prey on slugs — prominent corn and soybean pests — thereby reducing crop yields.5

Other research revealed that planting seeds coated with neonicotinoids reduced predatory insects by up to 20 percent.6 Such insects help to reduce pest infestations on crops from insect pests like black cutworm, giving another example of how using neonicotinoids may actually lead to reduced crop yields for farmers. There are other alarming effects as well, particularly since only about 2 percent of the chemical is taken up by the plants.

“The critical question is where the rest goes,” Tooker says, and it’s known that some of it ends up in nearby waterways where the chemicals are now polluting rivers and streams and killing off aquatic insects that other species depend on for food. Not only can the treated seeds directly kill birds if they pick one up for a snack, but research suggests that declines in insect-eating birds are associated with high usage of neonicotinoids.7

An investigation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) even found that treating soybean seeds with neonicotinoids provides no significant financial or agricultural benefits for farmers.8 The researchers also noted there are several other foliar insecticides available that can combat pests as effectively as neonicotinoid seed treatments, with fewer risks.

youtube

Duration of Pesticide Exposure Is a Ticking Time Bomb

Risk assessments for pesticide application often consider only the present time of use and don’t factor in that usage may increase over time or the modes of application may change. In reality, pesticide usage is changing rapidly and non-target species are being exposed to multiple chemical agents for long durations of time, with unknown consequences. Writing in the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science, researchers tackled the question of how changing pesticide usage over time may affect migrating amphibians such as frogs.9

They looked in particular at glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide, which has been continuously increasing since it was introduced in the 1970s. “Glyphosate-based herbicides can be used as an appropriate indicator for assessing how changes in pesticide application modes affect wild-living organisms in agricultural landscapes over time,” they reasoned, estimating that the use of glyphosate in German agriculture increased by 5.7-fold from 1992 to 2012.

During this time, amphibians also became more likely to transverse fields treated with the chemical during their travels. Their analysis found that juvenile great crested newts and fire-bellied toads faced the highest likelihood of coming into contact with the herbicides, while moor frogs and spadefoot toads were subjected to moderate increased of exposure ranging up to 3.6-fold higher.

Such exposure could be devastating, as glyphosate-based herbicides are toxic to amphibians, especially during the aquatic life stages, with POEA (polyethoxylated tallow amine), a surfactant commonly added to the chemical formulations, thought to be responsible for many of the adverse effects. Although POEA-free glyphosate-based herbicides were introduced in Germany in 2013, there is still concern that glyphosate-based herbicides could lead to problems with development, malformations, stress and death in amphibians.10

Dicamba Drift Reports Continue

In November 2016, the EPA approved Monsanto’s weedkiller, XtendiMax with VaporGrip Technology, a dicamba variety that is supposedly less prone to vaporization and drift, designed for use with genetically engineered (GE) dicamba-resistant seeds. The chemical was supposed to solve earlier problems caused by Monsanto’s dicamba-resistant crops, which were released before they received approval for the less drift-prone herbicide.

As a result, illegal dicamba formulations were used, and the resulting dicamba drift caused significant damage to cropland across the U.S. The newer dicamba, however, did not prove to be the panacea that Monsanto had promised, and by November 2017, an estimated 3.6 million acres across the U.S. had been damaged by dicamba drift,11 as had trees in Iowa, Illinois and Tennessee.

In response, the EPA placed some restrictions on dicamba usage, making it more cumbersome for farmers. For instance, special training is required to apply the herbicide, and its application is prohibited when wind speeds are greater than 10 mph. Farmers are also asked to assess the risk that spraying could have on nearby crops, as well.

Despite this, reports of damage from dicamba drift have continued in 2018, including 25,000 acres of soybean damage in one area of Missouri alone. Some farmers feel they’re being forced to buy Monsanto’s GE dicamba-tolerant seeds, just so they can survive their neighbors’ chemical sprays.12 Kevin Bradley, a University of Missouri weed specialist, confirmed that this is, indeed, a reality, telling the Delta Farm Press:13

“From what I can tell … if you don’t have Xtend soybean, your crop is going to be cupped up from one end to the other. That’s not a surprise because we’ve seen that for the past two seasons … [It doesn’t take a] super-trained eye to see the tree injury from dicamba. It’s kind of shocking to me to see so much damage to trees … I said it all winter: it’s rarely one thing, but a combination of factors. One of those factors is physical drift …

We also have volatility. All the data in front of me says we still have a problem that hasn’t been addressed. It isn’t all operator error like some claim, no way … drift calls from folks who are incredulous and surprised at what’s happened. I’m not — this is the third year of this and I haven’t seen anything that’s worked to keep these products from moving off-site.”

Monsanto, meanwhile, has continued to downplay the damage reports, sometimes blaming them on farmers’ using the chemicals at wind speeds higher than outlined on the label, changes in wind speed or direction or on other factors entirely.

They have no plans to scale back usage of the environmentally devastating chemical, instead boasting that they intend to sell even more GE Xtend crops (and the dicamba to go along with them) in 2019: “We went from 25 million acres in 2017 to a doubling of 50 million acres this year [2018] and expect that to continue to rise for 2019.”14

The Hat Trick — Neonic-Coated Seeds With Roundup/Dicamba Premix

Pesticides do not provide a long-term solution, even in the best-case scenarios, as nature typically finds a way around them. Glyphosate-resistant superweeds like pigweed are now driving farmers to seek out dicamba-resistant crops, but dicamba-resistant weeds have already sprouted in Kansas and Nebraska, raising serious doubts that piling more pesticides on crops will help farmers, or the environment, in the long run.

In fact, in one greenhouse study of the weed Palmer amaranth, Jason Norsworthy, a weed scientist with the University of Arkansas, was able to induce dicamba resistance in just three generations by applying dicamba at sublethal doses to the first two generations. “Even though this resistance was recorded in an artificial environment, the research confirms herbicide resistance can develop in just three years if the same weed population is exposed to sublethal chemical doses,” Farm Journal reported.15

The industry’s solution, not surprisingly, has been to create crops tolerant to an ever-increasing mix of toxic chemicals. In 2016, for instance, Monsanto released Roundup Ready Xtend cotton and soybean seeds, designed to tolerate both Roundup and dicamba. Add in the neonicotinoid (neonic) seed coating and you’ve got exposure to three toxic chemicals all from the same seed.

In addition to the environmental risks, exposure to dicamba has been linked to developmental and reproductive problems as well as to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, a type of blood cancer originating in your lymphatic system.16Glyphosate has also been linked to a slew of health problems, including being labeled a probable carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).

Integrated Pest Management and Other Solutions for the Pesticide Time Bomb

There’s little doubt that the ever-increasing rate of pesticide usage is a ticking time bomb for environmental and human health — but there are other solutions that are far healthier (and productive) for everyone involved. Tooker, among other experts, recommends the use of integrated pest management (IPM) as one tool.

A 2015 study found that IPM techniques reduced pesticide use while boosting crop yields in a meta-analysis of 85 sites in 24 countries.17 Some were even able to eliminate pesticide use entirely using techniques such as crop rotation and pheromone traps to capture insect pests. In order to work, however, seed companies must cooperate and admit to their mistakes. Tooker wrote:18

“To implement IPM in field crops with neonicotinoids, seed companies need to acknowledge that the current approach is overkill and poses serious environmental hazards. Extension entomologists will then need to provide growers with unbiased information on strengths and limitations of neonicotinoids …

Finally, the agricultural industry needs to eliminate practices that encourage unnecessary use of seed coatings, such as bundling together various seed-based pest management products, and provide more uncoated seeds in their catalogs.”

Unfortunately, as it stands, an estimated 7.7 billion pounds of pesticides are applied to crops each year, and that number is steadily increasing.19 Rather than acknowledging that pesticide usage is overkill, companies like Monsanto incentivize the use of more harmful chemicals to farmers by offering cash back for purchasing more chemicals.

You can get involved by actively seeking out and supporting organic, regenerative farmers, who have decided that avoiding chemical-treated seeds and excessive chemical spraying is essential to nurturing soil health, protecting the environment and growing nutritious food.

from HealthyLife via Jake Glover on Inoreader http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2018/07/17/pesticide-ticking-time-bomb.aspx

0 notes

4rhealth · 7 years ago

Text

“Not Everyone Who Wants to Reproduce Will Be Able”

Common chemicals are causing sperm deformity and decreased sperm counts. Action Alert!

A new study suggests that when a mother is exposed to endocrine-disrupting chemicals during pregnancy, her son and the son’s future generations may suffer from decreased fertility. This is the latest among a mounting body of scientific evidence that links these common chemicals—found in a wide variety of products including plastics, pesticides, PVC piping, cosmetics, medical devices, and children’s toys—to the fertility crisis we are facing, and it’s time for regulators to do something about it.

We’ve reported on the fertility crisis a number of times over the years. Scientists say that approximately 90% of sperm in a typical young man are misshapen, meaning they are unable to swim correctly. Additionally, sperm counts have decreased sharply over the last seventy-five years. As one researcher bluntly stated, “Not everyone who wants to reproduce will be able to.”

There’s a great deal of evidence that points to endocrine disruptors as a major cause of this problem. Quite simply, these chemicals disrupt the proper functioning of hormones. One study found an association between higher concentrations of phthalates (a chemical used in plastics) and increased damage to sperm DNA. Another study by Canadian scientists found that adding endocrine disruptors to Lake Ontario turned male fathead minnows into intersexual fish (fish with both male and female characteristics), which are unable to reproduce. Unfortunately, these are far from the only studies positing a link between chemicals and infertility.

There’s also evidence that GMOs share some of the responsibility. A Russian study on hamsters showed that consumption of GM soybeans tended to slow their sexual maturation process and completely eliminated their ability to reproduce within just a few generations. An Austrian study uncovered similar infertility in third-generation mice that consumed GM corn.

That’s not all. Many of the herbicides and pesticides used in conventional farming are “environmental estrogens.” This means that their molecules mimic the activity of the human hormone estrogen, too much of which is not good for men or women; it also affects testosterone levels. GMO crops have exacerbated this problem. According to an animal study published in the journal Toxicology in Vitro, glyphosate (the active ingredient in Roundup, Bayer/Monsanto’s widely used pesticide) often leaves a residue on Roundup Ready crops—and this affects testosterone levels and men’s sperm counts. It is actually toxic to testicle cells, and significantly lowers testosterone synthesis. Consider, too, that recent research has found that “inert” ingredients in herbicides can be more toxic than the active ingredients: POEA (polyethoxylated tallow amine), an “inert” ingredient in Roundup, has been found to be 1,200 to 2,000 times more toxic to human cells than glyphosate.

It’s best to avoid exposure to these chemicals in the first instance, but this can be challenging given that they can be found in unexpected places, such as dental offices (there is bisphenol-A, or BPA, in dental sealants), checkout receipts that are coated with BPA, and trans fats, which have been linked with an increased risk of infertility by as much as 70%. Thankfully there are natural ways to help improve male fertility where exposure is unavoidable.

There are a number of supplements that can be of use in restoring fertility. The Life Extension Foundation points out that L-carnitine and acetyl-L-carnitine have proven benefits on sperm quality, including sperm count and motility; zinc, vitamin C, and CoQ10 also improve sperm quality. Natural medicine specialists can also help with more sophisticated tests as well as individualized food, supplement, and exercise protocols. For help finding an integrative practitioner, consult our “Find a Practitioner” page.

Although exposure oftentimes is inescapable, it shouldn’t be that way. The EPA should expedite review of these chemicals and remove those that pose dangers to fertility or human health in general. Remember that, of the 85,000 chemicals currently on the market, the EPA has reviewed about 250, and banned only five chemicals (or classes of chemicals). In 2016 Congress passed legislation that updated chemical regulation in the US, which included a mandatory requirement for the EPA to evaluate existing chemicals with enforceable deadlines and to prioritize review of chemicals that pose the greatest risk. Given the evidence that endocrine disruptors are making large numbers of men infertile, the EPA should prioritize review of these chemicals and regulate them appropriately.

Action Alert! Write to Congress and the EPA, and tell them to prioritize review of endocrine disruptors, which are causing huge spikes in infertility. Please send your message immediately.

from The Alliance for Natural Health https://ift.tt/2MMH5Gn via Aloe for Health

#The Alliance for Natural Health

0 notes

billgsoto · 7 years ago

Text

Action: Glyphosate/Roundup Must Be Removed from the Market

(Beyond Pesticides, April 23, 2018) The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is accepting comments on its human health and environmental risk assessments of glyphosate (sold as Roundup

, Rodeo

, and many other products) until April 30. Evidence is mounting that glyphosate products cause cancer and many other human health and environmental problems. Sign the petition asking EPA to ban glyphosate. Despite the prevalent myth that this widely used herbicide is harmless, glyphosate is associated with a wide range of illnesses, including non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, genetic damage, liver and kidney damage, and endocrine disruption, as well as environmental damage, including water contamination and harm to amphibians. Researchers have also determined that the “inert” ingredients in glyphosate products, especially polyethoxylated tallow amine or POEA –a surfactant commonly used in glyphosate and other herbicidal products— are even more toxic than glyphosate itself. Monsanto, manufacturer of glyphosate, formulates many products (such as Roundup

and Rodeo

) and markets formulations exclusively used on genetically engineered (GE) crops. Glyphosate is one of the most widely used herbicides in the world, due in large part to the increased cultivation of GE crops that are tolerant of the herbicide. This petition summarizes the reasons glyphosate should be banned. More information can be […]

The post Action: Glyphosate/Roundup Must Be Removed from the Market appeared first on Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog.

from Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog https://ift.tt/2K7GU7t

from Grow your own https://ift.tt/2qRSQRQ

#Grow your own

0 notes

lindamcsherry · 8 years ago

Text

Farmer’s Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma Diagnosis Result in Lawsuit Over Roundup

A Wisconsin farmer has filed a product liability lawsuit against Monsanto, alleging that years of Roundup exposure while spraying his crops with the weed killer caused his non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma diagnosis.

The complaint (PDF), filed by Larry Faschingbauer in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on February 9, indicates that Monsanto failed to investigate, study and test the safety of Roundup, and also failed to minimize the dangers faced by farmers and other agricultural workers by withholding warnings and instructions.

Faschingbauer began using Roundup on his crops in the 1980s, and used it around his farm for decades. In May 2012, the farmer was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) at the Mayo Clinic, which he indicates was caused by exposure to glyphosate and other ingredients contained in Roundup.

“For nearly 40 years, farms across the world have used Roundup without knowing of the dangers its use poses. That is because when Monsanto first introduced Roundup, it touted glyphosate as a technological breakthrough: it could kill almost every weed without causing harm either to people or to the environment,” the lawsuit states. “Of course, history has shown that not to be true.”

The lawsuit cites the March 2015 determination by the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which found that Roundup and other glyphosate herbicides are potential human carcinogens.

Monsanto has denied that there is a link between Roundup and lymphona, calling the IARC’s findings “junk science.” However, farmers, landscapers, groundskeepers and other plaintiffs regularly exposed to the weedkiller maintain that Monsanto knew about the cancer risks for decades, and has actively tried to cover up or downplay the scientific data.

Faschingbauer’s complaint warns that glyphosate may not be acting alone in increasing cancer risks from Roundup, also pointing to the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine (POEA), another ingredient in Roundup, which may be acting together with glyphosate to increase cancer risks.

“Those most at risk are farm workers and other individuals with workplace exposure to Roundup, such as garden center workers, nursery workers, and landscapers,” the lawsuit states. “Monsanto assured the public that Roundup was harmless. In order to prove this, Monsanto has championed falsified data and has attacked legitimate studies that revealed Roundup’s dangers.”

Monsanto faces a growing number of similar Roundup lawsuits filed on behalf of other farmers and agricultural workers, each involving allegations that plaintiffs may have avoided a non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) diagnosis if they had been provided proper warnings and instructions regarding safety precautions to reduce the risk of exposure.

The post Farmer’s Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma Diagnosis Result in Lawsuit Over Roundup appeared first on AboutLawsuits.com.

0 notes

cassandradodds · 8 years ago

Text

Roundup’s Main Ingredient Continues to be Tied to Cancer

California Adds Glyphosate to its List of Chemicals Known to Cause Cancer, Another Monsanto Lawsuit Filed

Roundup, which is manufactured by the Monsanto Company, is a type of weed killer and pesticide and is the most popular herbicide used around the world. Roundup has been on the market since the 1970s and exposure is typically seen in crop workers, applicators who spray Roundup, workers exposed to benches and woods found at large home improvement stores, and individuals who work at smaller nurseries and farm stands. Roundup is typically used on crops such as corn and soybeans, which are then often modified to survive the deadly effects of Roundup.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) indicates that United States farmers used about 185 million pounds of glyphosate in 2007, which was twice the amount used in 2001. Roundup sales in 2000 amount to nearly $2.8 billion, outselling other herbicides by five to one. That same year, the herbicide accounted for nearly 50 percent of Monsanto’s revenue. Glyphosate continues to remain one of the world’s most popular herbicides by sales volume.

More lawsuits are being filed against Monsanto over claims its popular weed killer, Roundup, causes cancer following release of recent research. Some 37 lawsuits were consolidated in November 2016 in Northern California where the first Monsanto cancer lawsuits were filed, including one wrongful death lawsuit filed in March 2016.

Meanwhile, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of a woman whose husband was diagnosed with an aggressive form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. He died on December 26, 2015. Three years prior, the family’s dog was diagnosed with lymphoma and died when he was six years old. The dog had played in the same fields that the deceased man had sprayed with Roundup. Meanwhile, false advertising lawsuits involve a Monsanto advertisement that states, “Roundup can be used where kids and pets will play and breaks down into natural material.” The ad shows a man with his head in the ground and a pet dog standing in the area treated with Roundup.

The couple operated a farm in Cambria, California for over four decades. The husband only used Roundup because he believed Monsanto’s claim that its herbicide was safe. In fact, among Monsanto’s claims, it touted that Roundup is as “safe as table salt”; however, lawsuits have alleged that Monsanto was aware for decades that glyphosate, which is the active chemical in Roundup, is a carcinogen. Allegations also include that Monsanto was aware, before glyphosate was first approved by the EPA, that the chemical includes a cancer risk.

Nearly 40 other actions have been filed against Monsanto in the Roundup Products Liability Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) No. 2741. The lawsuits all similarly allege that Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide—specifically the active ingredient, glyphosate—causes non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (lymph node cancer). Plaintiffs also allege that they or their deceased loved ones developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after using Roundup over the course of just a few years and that use of glyphosate with other ingredients—for instance, the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine (POEA)—causes Roundup to become even more lethal.

The World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) announced that glyphosate is “probably carcinogenic to humans” last March and noted that a “positive association has been observed for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.” The IARC reached this finding based on research conducted by 17 top cancer experts from 11 countries who met to assess the carcinogenicity of five pesticides. The IARC review of glyphosate led to the European Parliament calling for a total ban on non-commercial public use of glyphosate and stringent restrictions on its agricultural use. Also, California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) recently added glyphosate to the state’s list of chemicals that are known to cause cancer.

Monsanto responded by working with CropLife America to promote efforts to cut off U.S. funding for WHO’s IARC. The EPA intended to conduct four days of public meetings over industry objections. The meetings were meant to examine scientific research on glyphosate; however, industry deemed the meetings “unnecessary” and “inappropriate,” stopping the meetings from taking place.

California, France, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Italy have raised concerns about Roundup and are considering if they should relicense the glyphosate herbicide. Based on IARC findings, the French Minister of Ecology has requested a ban on glyphosate herbicides across the European Union, The Guardian reported.

In the March 2015 The Lancet Oncology, a summary of research of five agricultural chemicals known as organophosphates rated glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans,” labeling the chemical a category 2A. “The risk of cancer may be present for individuals ranging from those who simply use the product in the yards or gardens to individuals who work in landscaping or on farms,” said Alan Christopher of Consumer Safety Watch, a consumer advocacy.

Roundup Associated with Serious Adverse Reactions

Previous studies have found that Monsanto’s Roundup is tied to numerous life-threatening health risks. Environmental and plant scientists, as well as consumer groups are concerned that glyphosate may lead to significant health issues such as various cancers, including leukemia and lymphoma, as well as Parkinson’s disease.

If you or someone you know has been exposed to Monsanto’s Roundup and developed leukemia, lymphoma, or Parkinson’s disease, or other injuries, the personal injury attorneys at Parker Waichman would like to hear from you.

Research has also found that probable harm to human health may begin at so-called “ultra-low” glyphosate levels, as low as 0.1 parts per billions (ppb). Other research found that Roundup has been tied to liver and kidney damage in rats at just a 0.05 ppb glyphosate equivalent. Meanwhile, glyphosate has been found in a number of popular foods. “It’s important for individuals and parents to understand that glyphosate contamination cannot be removed by washing and is not broken down by cooking or baking. Glyphosate residues can remain stable in food for a year or more, even if the foods are frozen or processed,” the research indicates.

Filing a Personal Injury Lawsuit

Parker Waichman is a national personal injury law firm that represents clients in drug, medical device, and product lawsuits with its mission to ensure patient safety and to hold manufacturers liable in situations in which they failed to warn consumers about the risks associated with their products. If you or someone you know suffered an adverse reaction due to contact with Monsanto’s Roundup or other pesticides and want to learn more about filing a personal injury lawsuit, contact our firm today by calling 1-800-YOURLAWYER (1-800-968-7529).

from Parker Waichman http://www.yourlawyer.com/blog/roundups-main-ingredient-continues-to-be-tied-to-cancer/

from WordPress https://parkerwaichman.wordpress.com/2017/01/13/roundups-main-ingredient-continues-to-be-tied-to-cancer/

#Roundup’s Main Ingredient Continues to be Tied to Cancer

0 notes

parkerwaichmanlaw · 8 years ago

Text

Roundup’s Main Ingredient Continues to be Tied to Cancer

California Adds Glyphosate to its List of Chemicals Known to Cause Cancer, Another Monsanto Lawsuit Filed

Roundup Associated with Serious Adverse Reactions

Filing a Personal Injury Lawsuit

from Parker Waichman http://www.yourlawyer.com/blog/roundups-main-ingredient-continues-to-be-tied-to-cancer/

#Roundup’s Main Ingredient Continues to be Tied to Cancer

0 notes

attorneygroup · 8 years ago

Photo

Lawsuit Alleges Man Developed Rare Cancer After Using Roundup

A Roundup cancer attorney notes a lawsuit in which the plaintiff claims to have developed a rare form of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma after using the popular herbicide on a regular basis for many years. Although Monsanto was reportedly aware of the dangers associated with Roundup, they continued to market and promote the product as safe. Affected individuals and their families may be eligible to file a claim and recover compensation with the help of a Roundup lawsuit attorney.

For more information, contact the Attorney Group today. Our consultations are free, confidential and without any obligation on your part. We can help answer your questions, and if you choose to pursue a claim we can connect you with an affiliated Roundup cancer attorney who can assist you throughout the legal process.

Important: The time you have to pursue a claim is limited. Contact us for more information.

Manufacturer Reportedly Continued to Market Roundup as a Safe Product

A man claims to have developed a rare form of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma after years of spraying Roundup herbicide on a regular basis. According to a lawsuit filed in December 2016, Monsanto, the manufacturer of Roundup, failed to provide adequate warning with regards to the risks allegedly related to the exposure of two ingredients in Roundup, glyphosate and polyethoxylated tallow amine. As a result, the plaintiff claims to have incurred significant economic and non-economic damages as a result of his diagnosis with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.

Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup, is regulated under federal law and is registered with the Environmental Protection Agency. However, since the early 1980s, Monsanto has allegedly known of the dangers associated with the use of products containing glyphosate, including Roundup. After conducting and coordinating research into the possible causes of cancer, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic in humans” in March 2015. Despite these findings and Monsanto’s reported knowledge of the dangers associated with Roundup, the manufacturer continued to promote the product as safe.

How a Roundup Cancer Attorney Can Help

Makers of herbicides have a duty to sell products that are free from defects and that are not unreasonably dangerous. If a product poses a risk of serious injury, the manufacturer must provide adequate warnings of the danger. Failure to do this can make the manufacturer legally responsible for injuries caused by the product, and people harmed may be entitled to compensation, including:

Medical expenses

Pain and suffering

Loss of income or ability to work

If a loved one dies as a result of exposure to Roundup herbicide, his or her family members may be able to pursue compensation for the wrongful death of their loved one.

The Time You Have to File a Claim is Limited. Contact Us Today.

For more information, contact the Attorney Group. You can fill out the form on this page or contact us by phone or email.

After you contact us, an attorney will follow up to answer questions that you might have. There is no cost or obligation to speak with us, and any information you provide will be kept confidential.

Please note that the law limits the time you have to pursue a claim or file a lawsuit for an injury. If you think you have a case, you should not delay taking action.

New Post https://attorneygroup.com/blog/roundup-lawsuit-alleges-cancer-development/

#Featured #Product Liability

0 notes

krsnan-blog · 6 years ago

Photo

GMO! AWAKE AMERICA WATCH FREEDOM TO FASCISM PON YOUTUBE AWAKE! AND WHAT ELSE IS THE GOVERNMENT HIDING FROM US? PERHAPS NASA IS A HOAX? CHECK OUT THIS FENOMENALE INSTA POSTS...BUZZ ALDREN ADMITTING THERE HAS NEVER!!!!BEEN A NASA MOON LANDING! WOW! https://www.instagram.com/p/BmBwsfoAsEj/?utm_source=ig_share_sheet&igshid=1oiz07ifftt2 There’s also evidence that GMOs share some of the responsibility. A Russian study on hamsters showed that consumption of GM soybeans tended to slow their sexual maturation process and completely eliminated their ability to reproduce within just a few generations. An Austrian study uncovered similar infertility in third-generation mice that consumed GM corn. That’s not all. Many of the herbicides and pesticides used in conventional farming are “environmental estrogens.” This means that their molecules mimic the activity of the human hormone estrogen, too much of which is not good for men or women; it also affects testosterone levels. GMO crops have exacerbated this problem. According to an animal study published in the journal Toxicology in Vitro, glyphosate (the active ingredient in Roundup, Bayer/Monsanto’s widely used pesticide) often leaves a residue on Roundup Ready crops—and this affects testosterone levels and men’s sperm counts. It is actually toxic to testicle cells, and significantly lowers testosterone synthesis. Consider, too, that recent research has found that “inert” ingredients in herbicides can be more toxic than the active ingredients: POEA (polyethoxylated tallow amine), an “inert” ingredient in Roundup, has been found to be 1,200 to 2,000 times more toxic to human cells than glyphosate. AWAKE AMERICA WATCH FREEDOM TO FASCISM PON YOUTUBE!AWAKE! INFERTILITY! Common chemicals are causing sperm deformity and decreased sperm counts. Action Alert! A new study suggests that when a mother is exposed to endocrine-disrupting chemicals during pregnancy, her son and the son’s future generations may suffer from decreased fertility. This is the latest among a mounting body of scientific evidence that links these common chemicals—found in a wide variety of products including plastics, pesticides, PVC piping, cosmetics, med https://www.instagram.com/p/Bn6PusUlN-h/?utm_source=ig_tumblr_share&igshid=1jlb7ue176uq5

0 notes

lindamcsherry · 8 years ago

Text

Roundup Mantle Cell Lymphoma Lawsuit Filed Against Monsanto

A Georgia man who indicates that he developed mantle cell lymophoma from exposure to Roundup has filed a lawsuit against Monsanto, alleging that the manufacturer failed to warn about the cancer risk associated with the popular weedkiller.

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Christopher Northover in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, claiming that Roundup is defective, dangerous to human health and lacked proper warnings and directions about the dangers associated with glyphosate contained in the herbicide.

Northover states that he began using Roundup in approximately 1990, and regularly sprayed the weedkiller according to all safety and precautionary warnings provided by Monsanto.

As a result of glyphosate contained in Roundup, Northover indicates that he was subsequently diagnosed with mantle cell lymphoma, which is a form of large b-cell lymphoma that mainly affects men over 60, and only comprises about 5% of all cases of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) diagnosed.

Mantle cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma can progress slowly, or be very aggressive, and generally forms in the mantle of the lymph node. It is considered one of the more dangerous forms of cancer, because it is hard to detect, and often is not found until it has spread to bone marrow or the gastrointestinal tract.

The case joins a growing number of Roundup lawsuits filed against Monsanto by farmers, landscapers, agricultural workers and others exposed to the weedkiller throughout the United States. Each of the plaintiffs raise similar allegations, indicate that their diagnosis with various forms of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) was due to the manufacturer’s reckless promotion of Roundup, which pushed greater and greater use of the chemical, without disclosing the potential health risks or providing sufficient safety instructions to minimize exposure.

Concerns about the link between Roundup and lymphoma surfaced in March 2015, when the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) determined that glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, is likely a cancer-causing agent. In particular, the IARC report links the side effects of Roundup to an increased risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Monsanto has denied that there is a link between Roundup and lymphona, calling the IARC’s findings “junk science.” However, Northover and other plaintiffs maintain that Monsanto knew about the risks for decades and has actively tried to cover up or downplay the scientific data, and that its own testing of glyphosate was insufficient.

In addition, the lawsuit warns that glyphosate may not be acting alone in increasing cancer risks, also pointing to the surfactant polyethoxylated tallow amine (POEA), another ingredient in Roundup, which may be acting together with glyphosate to increase cancer risks.

“Defendant knew or should have known that tests limited to Roundup’s active ingredient glyphosate were insufficient to prove the safety of Roundup,” the lawsuit states. “Defendant failed to appropriately and adequately test Roundup, Roundup’s adjuvants and ‘inert’ ingredients, and/or the surfactant POEA to protect Plaintiff from Roundup. Rather than performing appropriate tests, Defendant relied upon flawed industry-supported studies designed to protect Defendant’s economic interests rather than Plaintiff and the consuming public.”

The lawsuits over Roundup allege that plaintiffs may have avoided a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or other cancers if they had been warned about the Roundup risks for farmers, landscapers and others in the agricultural industry, as safety precautions could have been taken or other products could have been used to control the growth of weeds.

Northover’s lawsuit will be consolidated with all other Roundup cases pending in the federal court system, which are centralized before U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria in the Northern District of California, for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings. Following coordinated proceedings before Judge Chhabria, if Roundup settlements or another resolution for the cases are not reached, each individual complaint may be remanded back to the federal courts where it was originally filed for an individual trial date.

The post Roundup Mantle Cell Lymphoma Lawsuit Filed Against Monsanto appeared first on AboutLawsuits.com.

0 notes