#political_analysis

[politicsburrow]

Vivek Ramaswamy presidential beliefs Vivek Ramaswamy's Bold Vision: The Six Beliefs Shaping His Presidential Candidacy Vivek Ramaswamy's presidential beliefs challenge conventional political norms. Vivek Ramaswamy's Unconventional Presidential Beliefs: A Deeper DiveBy Ava Roberts, NewsBurrow Press TeamIn the realm of American politics, Vivek Ramaswamy's bid for the presidency has ignited a fierce debate. The 38-year-old biotech multi-millionaire has captured headlines with his unique take on critical issues, positioning himself as a political outsider ready to challenge the status quo. Let's delve deeper into the six intriguing beliefs of the Republican presidential candidate that have stirred the political pot.1. H-1B Visa Reform: "A Meritocratic Admission"Ramaswamy's fervent stance on overhauling the H-1B visa program has drawn both praise and criticism. He labels it "a form of indentured servitude" that favors corporations over skilled foreign workers. While some argue that his past use of the program for his pharmaceutical company, Roivant Sciences, contradicts his position, Ramaswamy contends that he played by the existing rules. He pledges to reform the system if elected, emphasizing the need for "meritocratic admission."What's new: Ramaswamy's call for merit-based immigration resonates with some, but critics raise concerns about the practicality of such a transition. Will his proposal find common ground?2. Raising the Voting Age: A Civic Duty RevivalIn an audacious move, Ramaswamy proposes raising the voting age to 25, but with a twist. He suggests allowing those over 18 to vote if they meet a "national service requirement." This includes serving as an emergency first responder or completing at least six months in the military. It's a bid to revive civic duty in America and encourage young citizens to contribute meaningfully.What's new: Ramaswamy's proposal prompts discussions about redefining civic engagement and the role of young adults in shaping the nation's future. Is this a progressive step or an impractical change?3. Ukraine Conflict Resolution: Major Concessions and International RelationsWhile most Western leaders advocate a hardline stance against Russia in the Ukraine conflict, Ramaswamy takes a different approach. He calls for Ukraine to make "major concessions" and proposes a Korean-war style armistice agreement. To counter the Chinese-Russian alliance, he suggests preventing Ukraine from entering NATO while requiring Russia to sever military ties with China.What's new: Ramaswamy's strategy challenges the conventional narrative, emphasizing American interests over ideological battles. Can major concessions lead to lasting peace, or is it a dangerous gamble?4. Abortion Laws: A State-Level ApproachRamaswamy's stance on abortion is a unique blend of pro-life principles and limited federal intervention. He argues that murder laws, including abortion regulations, should be handled at the state level. While he supports six-week abortion bans at the state level, he vehemently opposes a federal ban, stating that "the federal government should stay out of it."What's new: Ramaswamy's nuanced view raises questions about the balance between state autonomy and federal oversight. Can this approach satisfy pro-life and pro-choice advocates?5. FBI Reform: An Overhaul of Federal AgenciesThe Republican candidate isn't stopping at H-1B visa reform; he's eyeing a broader transformation of federal agencies. Ramaswamy calls for the abolition of several departments, including the FBI. He proposes redirecting the FBI's funding to the Secret Service, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, and the Defense Intelligence Agency.What's new: Ramaswamy's bold proposal to abolish the FBI comes at a time of declining public confidence in the agency. Is it time for a federal agency shake-up, or is this a risky move?6. Government Transparency and 9/11 ClaimsPerhaps the most controversial of Ramaswamy's beliefs revolves around government transparency. He questions the events of 9/11, specifically, the presence of police and federal agents on the planes that struck the Twin Towers. While his comments stirred controversy, Ramaswamy later clarified his stance, emphasizing the need for comprehensive assessments and public access to information.What's new: Ramaswamy's call for transparency has reignited discussions about government accountability. Is it time for a closer examination of 9/11, or should we focus on other pressing issues?In conclusion, Vivek Ramaswamy's unorthodox presidential beliefs challenge the conventional political landscape. While some view his ideas as innovative and refreshing, others see them as divisive and risky. As the 2024 presidential race unfolds, one thing is certain: Ramaswamy has injected a new wave of discourse into American politics, sparking debates that demand careful consideration and critical examination from all sides. Join the conversation and share your thoughts on these intriguing proposals. [ad_1] Vivek Ramaswamy's Bold Vision: The Six Beliefs Shaping His Presidential Candidacy As we delve into Vivek Ramaswamy's beliefs and his unconventional approach to politics, it's essential to stay informed and engaged in the discourse surrounding these intriguing ideas. Political Books can be your gateway to a deeper understanding of the issues at hand, offering various perspectives, analyses, and historical context that can enrich your comprehension of the topics discussed in this article.These books can provide you with valuable insights into the complexities of immigration policies, constitutional amendments, foreign relations, and even the role of government agencies like the FBI. Whether you're a seasoned political enthusiast or just beginning to explore these matters, these carefully curated Political Books can guide you on your journey to informed citizenship.So, let's embark on this intellectual exploration together, and when you're ready to delve deeper, just scroll down to discover these thought-provoking books that complement the themes discussed in Vivek Ramaswamy's presidential beliefs. Your next level of understanding awaits. [ad_1] Shop Products On Amazon Array [ad_1] Shop Products on Ebay Array [ad_1] Trending Similar Stories in the News Array [ad_1] Trending Videos of Vivek Ramaswamy presidential beliefs Array [ad_2] Similar Posts, Popular Now Schools Recognizing Furries Governor Ron DeSantis controversy Disney employee benefits controversy

[breakingnewsburrow]

Trump legal cases Unveiling the Next Phase: A Deep Dive into Trump Legal Cases and Dramatic Hearings Trump legal cases are igniting a national debate over the intersection of justice and politics. A Pivotal Day Unfolds: Trump Legal Cases Enter a New PhaseIn a turn of events that will undoubtedly shape the political landscape, Americans are on the brink of gaining unprecedented insights into the trials of former President Donald Trump. As he continues to navigate the intricacies of an intense legal battle, Trump's bid for the presidency hangs in the balance, raising questions about the intersection of justice and political ambition.This Monday promises to be a day of high drama, with two critical hearings poised to propel Trump's quadruple criminal indictments into a new dimension. The remarkable scenes and calculated political moves that culminated in the release of Trump's mug shot last week are mere preludes to the legal showdowns that await in Georgia and Washington.Focusing first on Georgia, the spotlight turns to Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. With precision, she is set to present the initial substantive evidentiary arguments in one of the cases challenging Trump. The pivotal hearing revolves around the bid by former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows to transfer his state-level case to the federal court. Alongside Trump, Meadows faces charges in a sweeping racketeering case that alleges a broad conspiracy to alter the outcome of the 2020 election.In parallel, a significant legal moment unfolds in Washington, as Judge Tanya Chutkan presides over a status hearing. This proceeding hinges on dueling arguments from special counsel Jack Smith and Trump's defense team. The focus: determining the trial date for the federal investigation into Trump's alleged efforts to thwart now-President Joe Biden's ascent to office. With Smith advocating for a January 2 commencement, mirroring the ever-nearing Iowa caucuses, Trump's team counters with a proposal to delay until April 2026.What emerges from these hearings are critical insights into the challenges Trump faces. His audacious endeavor to secure a major party presidential nomination while simultaneously navigating multiple criminal trials sets an unparalleled stage. The hearings not only shed light on the strain Trump and his team endure but also underscore the resource drain they anticipate in the forthcoming year. As the courtroom competes with the campaign trail, the delicate legal equation looms large—any progress in one case could be offset by setbacks in another, raising the specter of a conviction even before the 2024 elections.Intriguingly, this latest legal twist unfolds against a backdrop of escalating claims by Trump that he is a victim of political persecution under the Biden administration. The former president's swift pivot from surrendering at the Fulton County jail to capitalizing on his own mug shot in fundraising appeals encapsulates the tenor of his response. Drawing parallels to historical tyranny, Trump paints the Biden administration's pursuit of him as a direct challenge to the values the United States holds dear.The drama surrounding these trials is poised to seize public attention in the days ahead, but beneath the surface spectacle lies a weighty significance. Trump stands as the first ex-president to face criminal charges while simultaneously contending for the nomination of his party. This unprecedented confluence intensifies the stakes; the possibility that his campaign for a new term could coincide with a conviction thrusts the gravity of the situation into stark relief. The heart of the charges in both the federal election subversion case and the Georgia case lies in the assertion that Trump leveraged his immense presidential power to undermine the fundamental democratic principle: the right to vote.Remarkably, the Georgia hearing holds the potential to divulge major revelations, centered not on Trump directly, but on Meadows. The former chief of staff is seeking to transfer his case to federal court, arguing that his actions following the 2020 election fall within the purview of his duties as a federal official. This maneuver, if successful, could offer Meadows a favorable environment for his defense, raising questions about the boundaries of official responsibilities.The cast of characters in this legal drama extends to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and two other lawyers who were present during a pivotal call in January 2021. Trump's urging to "find" votes to overturn the election's outcome in Georgia led to a subpoena, calling them to testify. As Monday's hearings provide a window into Meadows' case, they also foreshadow Trump's future attempt to move his own case to federal court—a strategic move aimed at influencing the composition of a sympathetic jury pool.Voices from both sides of the aisle offer their insights. Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, a vocal critic of Trump, acknowledges the potential merit of Meadows' motion but cautions against assuming its impact on the ultimate verdict. Experts further underscore that the outcome of the Meadows case does not necessarily foretell the response Trump may receive, should he make a similar request to the courts.Maryland Democratic Representative Jamie Raskin, a key figure in the investigation into the January 6 Capitol attack, asserts that the state's authority to prosecute federal officials and employees extends beyond the parameters of federal work. Raskin's perspective underscores the complexity of the legal terrain, where nuances of official duties and policy interplay with jurisdiction.Trump's legal battles extend beyond Georgia, with a federal investigation led by special counsel Jack Smith. Earlier this month, Trump entered a plea of not guilty to four criminal charges linked to his endeavors to overturn the election results. A chorus of controversy surrounds the case, with Judge Chutkan emphasizing that Trump's status as a criminal defendant supersedes his activities as a presidential candidate. Despite Trump's vehement criticism of Smith and Chutkan, the judge's intention to expedite proceedings is palpable, even as Trump's legal team contends with voluminous evidence.The clash of legal timelines comes to the fore, with Trump's attorneys pushing back against Smith's proposed trial date. Simultaneously embroiled in separate cases—a Florida case surrounding alleged mishandling of national security secrets and a business accounting case with implications for a payment to an adult film star—Trump's defense team argues that Smith's preferred timeline clashes with these proceedings.Smith's intent to initiate jury selection in the federal election subversion case in December introduces another layer of complexity. Should he secure the January 2 trial date, it would be just days before the third anniversary of the Capitol mob attack—a poignant reminder of the visceral intensity that continues to shape American politics.In a world where legal proceedings are increasingly entangled with political ambitions, Monday's hearings beckon as a pivotal juncture. As NewsBurrow News Network delves into the heart of these unfolding events, the nation watches with bated breath. The interplay of law and politics, justice and ambition, marks this moment as a crossroads with far-reaching consequences. In the intricate tapestry of the Trump legal cases, the threads of democracy, accountability, and governance are tightly woven, shaping the trajectory of the nation's future. [ad_1] Unveiling the Next Phase: A Deep Dive into Trump Legal Cases and Dramatic Hearings Discover the Intriguing World of Legal DocumentariesAs the legal landscape unfolds with the trials and challenges facing former President Donald Trump, there's a unique opportunity to delve deeper into the world of the law. Just as these high-stakes courtroom dramas captivate our attention, legal documentaries offer an engaging way to explore real-life cases, uncover legal intricacies, and gain insights into the workings of the justice system. As you read about the unfolding drama and legal proceedings, why not take a moment to enrich your understanding with thought-provoking legal documentaries?Legal documentaries provide an intimate look at high-profile cases, shedding light on the complexities of the law and the impact it has on individuals and society. Through in-depth interviews, expert analysis, and gripping storytelling, these documentaries offer a comprehensive view of legal battles, ethical dilemmas, and the pursuit of justice. Whether you're a legal enthusiast, curious about the inner workings of the courtroom, or simply intrigued by the intersection of law and society, legal documentaries offer a unique and enriching viewing experience.As you follow the latest developments in Trump's legal cases, consider taking a break to explore a world beyond the headlines. Immerse yourself in the world of legal documentaries, where real-life stories unfold with all the suspense and drama of a courtroom thriller. With each documentary, you'll gain a deeper understanding of the legal challenges faced by individuals, communities, and even nations. So, join us on this journey through the legal landscape, and let these documentaries open your eyes to the power and impact of the law in our lives. [ad_1] Shop Products On Amazon Array [ad_1] Shop Products on Ebay Array [ad_1] Trending Similar Stories in the News Array [ad_1] Trending Videos of Trump legal cases Array [ad_2] Similar Posts, Popular Now WHO Health Advisory Group Global Inflation Trends Disney employee benefits controversy Trump Mar-a-Lago security footage Loch Ness Monster Hunt

[mix442]

The secret way to earn more than $50 from YouGov

[dunilefra]

Admirable Articles of Botswana's Constitution

6. Protection from slavery and forced labour (Part of it)

1. No person shall be held in slavery or servitude.

2. No person shall be required to perform forced labour.

3. For the purposes of this section, the expression "forced labour" does not include—

4. any labour required during any period of public emergency or in the event of any other emergency or calamity that threatens the life and well-being of the community, to the extent that the requiring of such labour is reasonably justifiable in the circumstances of any situation arising or existing during that period or as a result of that other emergency or calamity, for the purpose of dealing with that situation; or

8. Protection from deprivation of property

1. No property of any description shall be compulsorily taken possession of, and no interest in or right over property of any description shall be compulsorily acquired, except where the following conditions are satisfied, that is to say—

the taking of possession or acquisition is necessary or expedient—

in the interests of defence, public safety, public order, public morality, public health, town and country planning or land settlement;

in order to secure the development or utilization of that, or other, property for a purpose beneficial to the community; or

in order to secure the development or utilization of the mineral resources of Botswana; and

provision is made by a law applicable to that taking of possession or acquisition—

for the prompt payment of adequate compensation; and

securing to any person having an interest in or right over the property a right of access to the High Court, either direct or on appeal from any other authority, for the determination of his or her interest or right, the legality of the taking of possession or acquisition of the property, interest or right, and the amount of any compensation to which he or she is entitled, and for the purpose of obtaining prompt payment of that compensation.

2. No person who is entitled to compensation under this section shall be prevented from remitting, within a reasonable time after he or she has received any amount of that compensation, the whole of that amount (free from any deduction, charge or tax made or levied in respect of its remission) to any country of his or her choice outside Botswana.

14. Protection of freedom of movement

1. No person shall be deprived of his or her freedom of movement, and for the purposes of this section the said freedom means the right to move freely throughout Botswana, the right to reside in any part of Botswana, the right to enter Botswana and immunity from expulsion from Botswana.

2. Any restriction on a person's freedom of movement that is involved in his or her lawful detention shall not be held to be inconsistent with or in contravention of this section.

3. Nothing contained in or done under the authority of any law shall be held to be inconsistent with or in contravention of this section to the extent that the law in question makes provision—

a. for the imposition of restrictions that are reasonably required in the interests of defence, public safety, public order, public morality or public health or the imposition of restrictions on the acquisition or use by any person of land or other property in Botswana and except so far as that provision or, as the case may be, the thing done under the authority thereof, is shown not to be reasonably justifiable in a democratic society;

b. for the imposition of restrictions on the freedom of movement of any person who is not a citizen of Botswana;

c. for the imposition of restrictions on the entry into or residence within defined areas of Botswana of persons who are not Bushmen to the extent that such restrictions are reasonably required for the protection or well-being of Bushmen;

d. for the imposition of restrictions upon the movement or residence within Botswana of public officers; or

e. [Repealed.]

4. If any person whose freedom of movement has been restricted by order under such a provision as is referred to in subsection (3)(a) of this section (other than a restriction which is applicable to persons generally or to general classes of persons) so requests at any time during the period of that restriction not earlier than six months after the order was made or six months after he or she last made such request, as the case may be, his or her case shall be reviewed by an independent and impartial tribunal presided over by a person, qualified to be enrolled as an advocate in Botswana, appointed by the Chief Justice.

5. On any review by a tribunal in pursuance of this section of the case of a person whose freedom of movement has been restricted, the tribunal may make recommendations, concerning the necessity or expediency of continuing the restriction to the authority by which it was ordered but, unless it is otherwise provided by law, that authority shall not be obliged to act in accordance with any such recommendations.

53. Prerogative of Mercy

The President may—

grant to any person convicted of any offence a pardon, either free or subject to lawful conditions;

grant to any person a respite, either indefinite or for a specified period, of the execution of any punishment imposed on that person for any offence;

substitute a less severe form of punishment for any punishment imposed on any person for any offence; and

remit the whole or part of any punishment imposed on any person for any offence or of any penalty or forfeiture otherwise due to the Government on account of any offence.

by Dunilefra, working for Constitutional Law

[politic-things]

صفحه دو: نتیجه انتخابات شهرداری استانبول و پیامدهای آن برای ترکیه

[politicsburrow]

Trump legal cases Unveiling the Next Phase: A Deep Dive into Trump Legal Cases and Dramatic Hearings Trump legal cases are igniting a national debate over the intersection of justice and politics. A Pivotal Day Unfolds: Trump Legal Cases Enter a New PhaseIn a turn of events that will undoubtedly shape the political landscape, Americans are on the brink of gaining unprecedented insights into the trials of former President Donald Trump. As he continues to navigate the intricacies of an intense legal battle, Trump's bid for the presidency hangs in the balance, raising questions about the intersection of justice and political ambition.This Monday promises to be a day of high drama, with two critical hearings poised to propel Trump's quadruple criminal indictments into a new dimension. The remarkable scenes and calculated political moves that culminated in the release of Trump's mug shot last week are mere preludes to the legal showdowns that await in Georgia and Washington.Focusing first on Georgia, the spotlight turns to Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. With precision, she is set to present the initial substantive evidentiary arguments in one of the cases challenging Trump. The pivotal hearing revolves around the bid by former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows to transfer his state-level case to the federal court. Alongside Trump, Meadows faces charges in a sweeping racketeering case that alleges a broad conspiracy to alter the outcome of the 2020 election.In parallel, a significant legal moment unfolds in Washington, as Judge Tanya Chutkan presides over a status hearing. This proceeding hinges on dueling arguments from special counsel Jack Smith and Trump's defense team. The focus: determining the trial date for the federal investigation into Trump's alleged efforts to thwart now-President Joe Biden's ascent to office. With Smith advocating for a January 2 commencement, mirroring the ever-nearing Iowa caucuses, Trump's team counters with a proposal to delay until April 2026.What emerges from these hearings are critical insights into the challenges Trump faces. His audacious endeavor to secure a major party presidential nomination while simultaneously navigating multiple criminal trials sets an unparalleled stage. The hearings not only shed light on the strain Trump and his team endure but also underscore the resource drain they anticipate in the forthcoming year. As the courtroom competes with the campaign trail, the delicate legal equation looms large—any progress in one case could be offset by setbacks in another, raising the specter of a conviction even before the 2024 elections.Intriguingly, this latest legal twist unfolds against a backdrop of escalating claims by Trump that he is a victim of political persecution under the Biden administration. The former president's swift pivot from surrendering at the Fulton County jail to capitalizing on his own mug shot in fundraising appeals encapsulates the tenor of his response. Drawing parallels to historical tyranny, Trump paints the Biden administration's pursuit of him as a direct challenge to the values the United States holds dear.The drama surrounding these trials is poised to seize public attention in the days ahead, but beneath the surface spectacle lies a weighty significance. Trump stands as the first ex-president to face criminal charges while simultaneously contending for the nomination of his party. This unprecedented confluence intensifies the stakes; the possibility that his campaign for a new term could coincide with a conviction thrusts the gravity of the situation into stark relief. The heart of the charges in both the federal election subversion case and the Georgia case lies in the assertion that Trump leveraged his immense presidential power to undermine the fundamental democratic principle: the right to vote.Remarkably, the Georgia hearing holds the potential to divulge major revelations, centered not on Trump directly, but on Meadows. The former chief of staff is seeking to transfer his case to federal court, arguing that his actions following the 2020 election fall within the purview of his duties as a federal official. This maneuver, if successful, could offer Meadows a favorable environment for his defense, raising questions about the boundaries of official responsibilities.The cast of characters in this legal drama extends to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and two other lawyers who were present during a pivotal call in January 2021. Trump's urging to "find" votes to overturn the election's outcome in Georgia led to a subpoena, calling them to testify. As Monday's hearings provide a window into Meadows' case, they also foreshadow Trump's future attempt to move his own case to federal court—a strategic move aimed at influencing the composition of a sympathetic jury pool.Voices from both sides of the aisle offer their insights. Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, a vocal critic of Trump, acknowledges the potential merit of Meadows' motion but cautions against assuming its impact on the ultimate verdict. Experts further underscore that the outcome of the Meadows case does not necessarily foretell the response Trump may receive, should he make a similar request to the courts.Maryland Democratic Representative Jamie Raskin, a key figure in the investigation into the January 6 Capitol attack, asserts that the state's authority to prosecute federal officials and employees extends beyond the parameters of federal work. Raskin's perspective underscores the complexity of the legal terrain, where nuances of official duties and policy interplay with jurisdiction.Trump's legal battles extend beyond Georgia, with a federal investigation led by special counsel Jack Smith. Earlier this month, Trump entered a plea of not guilty to four criminal charges linked to his endeavors to overturn the election results. A chorus of controversy surrounds the case, with Judge Chutkan emphasizing that Trump's status as a criminal defendant supersedes his activities as a presidential candidate. Despite Trump's vehement criticism of Smith and Chutkan, the judge's intention to expedite proceedings is palpable, even as Trump's legal team contends with voluminous evidence.The clash of legal timelines comes to the fore, with Trump's attorneys pushing back against Smith's proposed trial date. Simultaneously embroiled in separate cases—a Florida case surrounding alleged mishandling of national security secrets and a business accounting case with implications for a payment to an adult film star—Trump's defense team argues that Smith's preferred timeline clashes with these proceedings.Smith's intent to initiate jury selection in the federal election subversion case in December introduces another layer of complexity. Should he secure the January 2 trial date, it would be just days before the third anniversary of the Capitol mob attack—a poignant reminder of the visceral intensity that continues to shape American politics.In a world where legal proceedings are increasingly entangled with political ambitions, Monday's hearings beckon as a pivotal juncture. As NewsBurrow News Network delves into the heart of these unfolding events, the nation watches with bated breath. The interplay of law and politics, justice and ambition, marks this moment as a crossroads with far-reaching consequences. In the intricate tapestry of the Trump legal cases, the threads of democracy, accountability, and governance are tightly woven, shaping the trajectory of the nation's future. [ad_1] Unveiling the Next Phase: A Deep Dive into Trump Legal Cases and Dramatic Hearings Discover the Intriguing World of Legal DocumentariesAs the legal landscape unfolds with the trials and challenges facing former President Donald Trump, there's a unique opportunity to delve deeper into the world of the law. Just as these high-stakes courtroom dramas captivate our attention, legal documentaries offer an engaging way to explore real-life cases, uncover legal intricacies, and gain insights into the workings of the justice system. As you read about the unfolding drama and legal proceedings, why not take a moment to enrich your understanding with thought-provoking legal documentaries?Legal documentaries provide an intimate look at high-profile cases, shedding light on the complexities of the law and the impact it has on individuals and society. Through in-depth interviews, expert analysis, and gripping storytelling, these documentaries offer a comprehensive view of legal battles, ethical dilemmas, and the pursuit of justice. Whether you're a legal enthusiast, curious about the inner workings of the courtroom, or simply intrigued by the intersection of law and society, legal documentaries offer a unique and enriching viewing experience.As you follow the latest developments in Trump's legal cases, consider taking a break to explore a world beyond the headlines. Immerse yourself in the world of legal documentaries, where real-life stories unfold with all the suspense and drama of a courtroom thriller. With each documentary, you'll gain a deeper understanding of the legal challenges faced by individuals, communities, and even nations. So, join us on this journey through the legal landscape, and let these documentaries open your eyes to the power and impact of the law in our lives. [ad_1] Shop Products On Amazon Array [ad_1] Shop Products on Ebay Array [ad_1] Trending Similar Stories in the News Array [ad_1] Trending Videos of Trump legal cases Array [ad_2] Similar Posts, Popular Now WHO Health Advisory Group Global Inflation Trends Disney employee benefits controversy Trump Mar-a-Lago security footage Loch Ness Monster Hunt

[dunilefra]

Constitution of Azerbaijan

Article 6. Banning of Power Usurpation

I. No part of the Azerbaijan people, either an individual, or a social group or an organization has the right to usurp the authority of the Azerbaijan people to exercise the power.

II. Power usurpation is the most serious crime directed against the people.

Article 15. Economic Development and the State

II. The Azerbaijan State creates conditions for the development of a socially oriented economy, guarantees free enterprise and prevents monopolies and unfair competition in economic relations.

Article 26. Protection of Human rights and civil liberties

I. Everyone is authorized to defend his or her human rights and freedoms by accepted means.

Article 27. Right to Life

I. Everyone has the right to life.

II. Every citizen's right to life is inviolable with the exception of cases when as a result of the armed attack, an enemy soldier is killed, capital punishment is executed according to the court's decision and other cases specified by law.

III. Capital punishment as an extreme measure of punishment is still in force and can be applied to an individual for committing a grave crime against the State and different persons.

IV. Except in case of necessary defense, dire necessity, apprehension and detention of a criminal, prevention of an escape by a prisoner, prevention of a revolt or coup against the State, an armed attack against the country, the use of a weapon against a human is not permitted.

Article 29. Right to Property

VI. Land ownership may be restricted by law due to social justice and for efficient use of the land.

Article 34. Right to Marriage

I. Everybody has the right to marriage upon reaching the age specified by law.

II. Marriage is contracted on the basis of voluntary consent. No one shall be forced to marry.

III. Family and marriage are under the protection of the State. Mothers, fathers and children shall be protected by law. The State renders assistance to large families.

IV. The rights of husband and wife are equal. The care and raising of children is the right and obligation of both parents.

V. CPower usurpation is the most serious crime directed against the people.

children upon reaching the age of 18 have the duty to support their invalid parents.

a project by Dunilefra, working for Political Reform