#plagiarism detection software

[valtsv]

obviously people steal things from other people it's one of the oldest tricks in the book but it still always surprises me to learn that people plagiarise because my introduction to the concept was basically being told that if i ever plagiarised anything i would be executed by firing squad and my head would be removed and displayed on a spike outside the walls of the hallowed academic institution i was attending as a warning to others

[drillsoftware]

Everything You Need to Know About Comparing Two Documents for Plagiarism

Introduction

Plagiarism is a serious offense that undermines academic integrity and originality in writing. Online plagiarism checkers play a crucial role in detecting and preventing plagiarism in academic work.

Understanding Plagiarism

Plagiarism is the act of using someone else's words, ideas, or work without giving them proper credit. This includes both intentional and unintentional use of another person's work without citation. In educational institutions, plagiarism is considered a serious offense because it undermines the principles of academic honesty and integrity. It diminishes the value of original research and scholarship, and it can have severe consequences for students and professionals.

Forms of Plagiarism

Plagiarism can take various forms, including:

Direct Plagiarism: This involves verbatim copying of someone else's work without attribution. For example, copying and pasting a paragraph from a source without quotation marks or a proper citation.

Self-Plagiarism: Reusing one's own previously published work or parts of it without acknowledging it as such.

Mosaic Plagiarism: Piecing together phrases, sentences, or paragraphs from different sources to create a new work without proper citation.

Accidental Plagiarism: Unintentionally failing to cite sources properly due to lack of understanding about citation rules.

Originality.ai's Text Compare Tool

Originality.ai's Text Compare Tool is designed to help users detect potential instances of plagiarism by comparing two documents. It offers key features that enhance the plagiarism detection process:

Keyword Density Help: The tool provides assistance in checking keyword density within the text to ensure originality and proper use of keywords.

Wide Range of File Formats: Originality.ai's Text Compare Tool supports various file formats such as PDF, .docx, .odt, .doc, and .txt. This flexibility enables users to compare different types of documents for originality.

By combining these features, the tool empowers users to maintain academic integrity by identifying any similarities between their work and existing sources. This proactive approach helps writers uphold ethical writing practices while also improving the quality and originality of their content.

Using an Online Plagiarism Checker: A Step-by-Step Guide

When comparing documents for plagiarism, using an online plagiarism checker ensures a systematic approach to detecting similarities and maintaining academic integrity. Here's a step-by-step guide to effectively utilize an online plagiarism checker:

Step 1: Enter the First Document

Navigate to the online plagiarism checker tool and locate the designated area to input the first document. This can usually be done by clicking on a "browse" button or simply pasting the text into a provided text box. Platforms like Grammarly have user-friendly interfaces that simplify this process.

Step 2: Upload or Paste the Second Document

Similarly, upload the second document or paste its content into the specified field. Ensure that both documents are in a compatible format as required by the plagiarism checker. It's worth noting that some tools, like Turnitin, may require specific formatting or file types.

Step 3: Adjust the Settings (if applicable)

Some plagiarism checkers offer customization options such as setting exclusion parameters for specific sources or formatting types. Make any necessary adjustments to tailor the check according to your preferences. For instance, platforms like Drillbit provide advanced settings for comprehensive analysis.

Step 4: Run the Plagiarism Check

Initiate the plagiarism check process by clicking on the "Check Plagiarism" or equivalent button. The tool will then analyze the provided documents for similarities and potential instances of plagiarism. It's important to note that the duration of this process may vary depending on the tool and document length.

Step 5: Review the Results

Once the check is complete, carefully review the results provided by the tool. Take note of any highlighted areas of concern and assess the level of similarity detected between the documents. In some cases, like with Drillbit, you may need to wait for the analysis to finish before accessing the results.

By following these steps, you can effectively compare documents for plagiarism using an online plagiarism checker, aiding in upholding academic integrity and originality in your work.

Benefits of Using Online Plagiarism Checkers

Using online plagiarism checkers regularly has several advantages:

1. Promotes Academic Integrity

Online plagiarism checkers are crucial for maintaining academic integrity in educational institutions. These tools help ensure that the work submitted by students and researchers is original and not plagiarized. By using them, we can uphold the standards of academic honesty.

2. Encourages Originality and Critical Thinking

By relying on online plagiarism checkers, we create an environment that values originality and critical thinking. Students and researchers are encouraged to produce their own ideas instead of copying from others.

3. Saves Time and Effort

Online plagiarism checkers offer a convenient solution for writers who need to authenticate their work. Manually detecting plagiarism can be time-consuming, especially for long documents or multiple sources. These tools simplify the process by quickly comparing the text with extensive databases, making it easier to identify any instances of unoriginal content.

4. Easy to Use

Online plagiarism checkers are accessible to everyone and designed with user-friendliness in mind. They provide a simple interface where writers can easily upload their documents and initiate a plagiarism check. Within seconds, they receive comprehensive reports highlighting any similarities found.

5. Empowers Writers to Take Action

With the insights provided by online plagiarism checkers, writers can take proactive measures to maintain the integrity of their work and uphold ethical writing practices. They can revise their content, properly cite sources, or seek permission if needed.

In summary, online plagiarism checkers are valuable resources for both educators and writers. They help preserve academic integrity while making it easier to ensure originality in written work.

How to Prevent Plagiarism in Your Own Writing

To ensure academic integrity and avoid plagiarism in your own writing, it is important to go beyond just using online plagiarism checkers. Here are some essential tips and tools to help you prevent plagiarism effectively:

1. Properly cite your sources

Whenever you use information or ideas from external sources, it is crucial to give credit to the original authors. Use the appropriate citation style (such as APA, MLA, or Chicago) and follow the guidelines for in-text citations and reference lists.

2. Understand paraphrasing

Paraphrasing is an effective way to incorporate information from sources while maintaining originality. However, it is essential to rephrase the content in your own words and properly cite the source. Avoid simply replacing a few words or rearranging sentence structures without adding your own insights.

3. Use citation generators

Citation generators are valuable tools that can assist you in creating accurate citations and references for your academic papers. These tools allow you to input the necessary details of your sources and automatically generate citations in the required format. Examples of popular citation generators include EasyBib, BibMe, and Cite This For Me.

4. Develop strong research skills

Conducting thorough research not only helps you gather relevant information but also enables you to understand the topic more comprehensively. By becoming well-informed about a subject, you can present your ideas with clarity and confidence, reducing the likelihood of unintentional plagiarism.

5. Keep track of your sources

Maintain organized records of all the sources you consult during your research process. This includes recording important details such as author names, publication dates, page numbers, and URLs. Having this information readily available will make it easier for you to accurately cite your sources later on.

By following these guidelines and utilizing citation generators when needed, you can effectively prevent plagiarism in your own writing while upholding academic integrity.

Remember, preventing plagiarism is not just about avoiding the consequences; it is about respecting the intellectual property of others and contributing to the academic community with original ideas and insights.

Conclusion

Encouraging academic integrity and maintaining originality in academic writing are crucial for students and researchers. Online plagiarism checkers play a vital role in ensuring the authenticity of written work. By using these tools as a preventive measure, individuals can avoid unintentional plagiarism and uphold the principles of academic honesty.

However, it is important to note that relying solely on plagiarism checkers is not enough. Adopting a holistic approach to writing is essential for maintaining originality. Alongside the use of technological tools like plagiarism checkers, developing strong research and referencing skills is equally important.

Incorporating proper citation practices in academic writing helps give credit to the original authors and sources while enhancing the credibility of one's own work. Citation generators can be valuable resources for creating accurate citations and references.

By combining the use of online plagiarism checkers with effective research and referencing techniques, writers can ensure their work is original, credible, and contributes to the overall integrity of academia.

Remember, prioritizing academic integrity is an ongoing commitment that requires continuous improvement and attention to detail. Let's strive for excellence in our writing by embracing originality and upholding the standards of academic integrity.

[drillbitplagiarismchecker]

Explore the Benefits of a Plagiarism Tool for Enhanced Writing Experience

Plagiarism impact in academia and career fields

Plagiarism violates intellectual property rights and ethical standards. This undermines the integrity of the educational system and devalues hard work and original ideas. When you plagiarize, you not only cheat yourself out of a proper education, but you also cheat your classmates who put in the effort to produce original work. The consequences of plagiarism in academia can be severe, ranging from failing grades to expulsion.

Introducing plagiarism Tools

Plagiarism checker software applications designed to help writers and educators identify instances of plagiarism in written work. These tools use advanced algorithms and databases to compare your text against a vast collection of sources, including academic journals, websites, and previously submitted papers. By using a plagiarism tool, you can quickly and accurately determine the originality of your work and ensure that you are not inadvertently plagiarizing someone else's ideas.

Features of plagiarism Tools

Plagiarism detection tools work by comparing your text against a vast database of sources. They analyze your writing and highlight any passages that match existing content. Tools with advanced algorithms detect plagiarism and offer features like citation checking and grammar checks.

One of the key features of plagiarism tools is their ability to generate detailed reports. These reports provide a comprehensive analysis of your text, highlighting any potential instances of plagiarism and providing links to the original sources. Review and correct any unintentional plagiarism with customization options available in plagiarism tools.

Benefits of using a plagiarism tool

Using a plagiarism tool offers numerous benefits for writers, educators, and students alike. Firstly, it helps you maintain academic and professional integrity by ensuring that your work is original and properly credited. By using a plagiarism tool, you can be confident that your work is free from unintentional plagiarism and that you are giving credit where it is due.

Secondly, plagiarism tools save you time and effort. Instead of manually checking your work for plagiarism, which can be a time-consuming process, a plagiarism tool automates the detection process. This allows you to focus on the content of your writing rather than worrying about potential plagiarism issues. By using a plagiarism tool, you can streamline your writing process and increase your productivity.

Finally, using a plagiarism tool helps you improve your writing skills. By analyzing your work and providing detailed reports, plagiarism tools offer valuable feedback on your writing style, citation practices, and overall quality. These insights can help you identify areas for improvement and become a better writer. Plagiarism tools not only help you avoid plagiarism, but they also contribute to your growth as a writer.

How to choose the right plagiarism tool for your needs

When choosing a plagiarism tool, it is essential to consider your specific needs and requirements. Here are some factors to consider:

Accuracy: Ensure that the plagiarism tool you choose has a high degree of accuracy in detecting plagiarism. Look for tools that use advanced algorithms and have a comprehensive database of sources.

Customization: Consider a plagiarism tool that offers customization options to suit your specific needs. Look for features such as the ability to exclude specific sources or adjust the sensitivity of the plagiarism detection.

User-friendly interface: Choose a plagiarism tool that is easy to navigate and use. A user-friendly interface will make the process of checking for plagiarism more efficient and enjoyable.

Additional features: Consider whether you require additional features such as grammar and spelling checks, citation checking, or writing suggestions. Some plagiarism tools offer these features as part of their package, which can be beneficial for improving the overall quality of your writing.

Pricing: Evaluate the pricing structure of the plagiarism tool and determine if it fits within your budget. Some tools offer free versions with limited features, while others require a subscription or one-time payment.

By considering these factors, you can select a plagiarism detection tool that best suits your needs and helps you achieve your writing goals.

Master plagiarism tool for success

To make the most of a plagiarism detection tool, consider the following tips:

Use the plagiarism tool as a preventive measure rather than a last-minute check. Incorporate the tool into your writing process from the beginning to ensure that your work is original and properly credited.

Familiarize yourself with the features and functionality of the plagiarism tool. Take the time to explore the different options and settings to maximize its effectiveness.

Use the plagiarism tool as a learning tool. Pay attention to the detailed reports and feedback provided by the tool. Use this information to improve your writing skills and avoid common pitfalls.

Regularly update the database of the plagiarism tool. Ensure that you have access to the latest sources and databases to ensure accurate detection of plagiarism.

Combine the use of a plagiarism tool with other writing resources such as style guides, grammar checkers, and peer feedback. This holistic approach will help you produce high-quality, original work.

By following these tips, you can effectively utilize a plagiarism detection tool and enhance the quality and originality of your writing.

Plagiarism tool misconceptions clarified

There are several misconceptions surrounding plagiarism tools that need to be debunked. One common misconception is that plagiarism tools are 100% foolproof and can detect all instances of plagiarism. While plagiarism tools are highly accurate, they are not infallible. Some cases of plagiarism may go undetected due to various factors such as the use of paraphrasing or the availability of certain sources in the database.

Another misconception is that plagiarism tools encourage a culture of suspicion and mistrust. However, plagiarism tools are intended to promote academic and professional integrity rather than distrust. They serve as a tool for self-checking and improvement, allowing writers to ensure the originality and quality of their work.

Lastly, some people believe that plagiarism tools are only useful for educators and students. However, plagiarism tools have value beyond the academic setting. They can benefit professional writers, journalists, researchers, and anyone who values originality and intellectual property rights.

Conclusion

Plagiarism is a serious offense in academics and work. To prevent it and ensure originality, using a plagiarism tool is crucial. Through the use of these innovative tools, writers can not only maintain the integrity of their work but also streamline their writing process, ultimately saving valuable time. By carefully selecting the right tool for the job, writers can produce work that is of the highest quality and truly excel in their craft.

[sunfoxfic]

please tell me I have some writing studies followers who will find this as funny as I do

[easynotes4u]

High Rejection Rate of AI generated Contents in Academic Publishing like Scopus/ WOS/ UGC CARE

The high rejection rate of AI-generated content in academic publishing is a reflection of the challenges and concerns associated with the quality, authenticity, and ethical considerations of such content. AI generated content detected by Plagiarism software. AI-generated articles often face skepticism and scrutiny from academic publishers, indexing databases (such as Scopus and Web of Science),…

[fixyourwritinghabits]

AI, Plagiarism, and CYA

Shout-out for all the students gearing up to go back to school in increasingly frustrated times when dealing with all this AI bullshit. As you've probably noticed, lots of institutions have adapted anti-plagiarism software that incorporates AI detectors that - surprise - aren't that great. Many students are catching flack for getting dinged on work that isn't AI generated, and schools are struggling to catch up to craft policies that uphold academic rigor. It sucks for everyone involved!

As a student, it can really feel like you're in a bind, especially if you didn't do anything wrong. Your instructor isn't like to be as tech-savvy as some, and frankly, you might not be as tech-savvy as you think either. The best thing to do, no matter how your school is handling things, is to Cover Your Ass.

Pay attention to the academic policy. Look, I know you probably skimmed the syllabus. Primus knows I did too, but the policy there is the policy the instructor must stick with. If the policy sets down a strong 'don't touch ChatGPT with a ten-foot pole' standard, stick to it. If you get flagged for something you thought was okay because you didn't read the policy carefully, you don't have ground to stand on if you get called out.

Turn off Autosave and save multiple (named) drafts. If you're using Microsoft Word because your school gives you a free license, the handy Autosave feature may be shooting you in the foot when it comes to proving you did the work. I know this seems counter-intuitive, but I've seen this bite enough people in the ass to recommend students go old-school. Keep those "draft 1234" in a file just in case.

Maintaining timestamped, clearly different drafts of a paper can really help you in the long-run. GoogleDocs also goes a much better job of tracking changes to a document, and may be something to consider, however, with all this AI shit, I'm hesitant to recommend Google. Your best bet, overall, is to keep multiple distinctive drafts that prove how your paragraphs evolved from first to final.

Avoid Grammarly, ProWiritingAid, etc. All that handy 'writing tools' software that claims to help shore up your writing aren't doing you any favors. Grammarly, ProWritingAid, and other software throw up immediate flags in AI-detection software. You may have only used it to clean up the grammar and punctuation, but if the AI-detection software says otherwise, you might be screwed. They're not worth using over a basic spell and grammar check in both Word and GoogleDocs can already do.

Cite all citations and save your sources! This is basic paper-writing, but people using ChatGPT for research often neglect to check to make sure it isn't making shit up, and that made up shit is starting to appear on other parts of the internet. Be sure to click through and confirm what you're using for your paper is true. Get your sources and research material from somewhere other than a generative language model, which are known for making shit up. Yes, Wikipedia is a fine place to start and has rigorously maintained sources.

Work with the support your school has available. My biggest mistake in college was not reaching out when I felt like I was drowning, and I know how easy it is to get in you head and not know where to turn when you need more help. But I've since met a great deal of awesome librarians, tutors, and student aid staff that love nothing more to devote their time to student success. Don't wait at the last moment until they're swamped - you can and will succeed if you reach out early and often.

I, frankly, can't wait for all this AI bullshit to melt down in a catastrophic collapse, but in the meantime, take steps to protect yourself.

[durgeapologist]

Let's Talk About Ir Abelas, Da'ean

As some of you may know, I am vehemently against the dishonest use of AI in fandom and creative spaces. It has been brought to my attention by many, many people (and something I myself have thought on many times) that there is a DreadRook fic that is super popular and confirmed to be written at least partially with AI. I have the texts to prove it was written (at least) with the help of the Grammarly Rewrite generative feature.

Before I go any further, let it be known I was friends with this author; their use of rewrite features is something they told me and have told many other people who they have shared their fic with. It is not however, at the time of posting this, tagged or mentioned on their fic on AO3, in any capacity. I did in fact reach out to the author before making this post. They made absolutely no attempt to agree to state the use of Rewrite AI on their fic, nor be honest or upfront (in my opinion) about the possibility of their fic being complete generative AI. They denied the use of generative AI as a whole, though they did confirm (once again) use of the rewrite feature on Grammarly.

That all said: I do not feel comfortable letting this lie; since I have been asked by many people to make this, this post is simply for awareness.

You can form your own opinion, if you wish to. In fact, I encourage you to do such.

Aside from the, once again, high volume word output of around 352K words in less than 3 months (author says they had 10 chapters pre-written over "about a month" before they began posting; they are also on record saying they can write 5K-10K daily) from November until now, I have also said if you are familiar with AI services or peruse AI sites like ChatGPT, C.AI, J.AI, or any others similar to these, AI writing is very easy to pick out.

After some intense digging, research, and what I believe to be full confirmation via AI detection software used by professional publishers, there is a large and staggering possibility that the fic is almost entirely AI generated, bar some excerpts and paragraphs, here and there. I will post links below of the highly-resourced detection software that a few paragraphs and an entire chapter from this fic were plugged into; you are more than welcome to do with this information what you please.

I implore you to use critical thinking skills, and understand that when this many pieces in a work come back with such a high percentage of AI detected, that there is something going on. (There was a plethora of other AI detection softwares used that also corroborate these findings; I only find it useful to attach the most reputable source.)

Excerpts:

82% Likely Written by AI, 4% Plagiarism Match

98% Likely Written by AI, 2% Plagiarism Match

100% Likely Written by AI, 4% Plagiarism Match

Some excerpts do in fact come back as 100% likely written by human; however, this does not mean that the author was not using the Grammarly Paraphrase/Rewrite feature for these excerpts.

The Grammarly Paraphrase/Rewrite feature does not typically clock as AI generative text, and alongside the example below, many excerpts from other fics were take and put through this feature, and then fed back into the AI detection software. Every single one came back looking like this, within 2% of results:

So, in my opinion, and many others, this goes beyond the use of the simple paraphrase/rewrite feature on Grammarly.

Entire Chapter (Most Recent):

67% Likely Written by AI

As well, just for some variety, another detection software that also clocked plagiarism in the text:

15% Plagiarism Match

To make it clear that I am not simply 'jealous' of this author or 'angry' at their work for simply being a popular work in the fandom, here are some excerpts from other fanfics in this fandom and in other fandoms that were ran through the same exact same detection software, all coming back as 100% human written. (If you would like to run my fic through this software or any others, you are more than welcome to. I do not want to run the risk of OP post manipulation, so I did not include my own.)

The Wolf's Mantle

100% Likely Human Written, 2% Plagiarism Match

A Memory Called Desire

99% Likely Human Written

Brand Loyalty

100% Likely Human Written

Heart of The Sun

98% Likely Human Written

Whether you choose to use AI in your own fandom works is entirely at your own discretion. However, it is important to be transparent about such usage.

AI has many negative impacts for creatives across many mediums, including writers, artists, and voice actors.

If you use AI, it should be tagged as such, so that people who do not want to engage in AI works can avoid engaging with it if they wish to.

ALL LINKS AND PICTURES COURTESY OF: @spiritroses

[transmutationisms]

every automated cheating detection system seems to operate on a principle of flag everything, which de facto means that most instructors just ignore most cheating alerts but essentially always have the power to destroy a student's academic life by accusing them of cheating, w evidence. like even if no one ever accused you to your face, if your exams are getting filmed by those detection software programs & your essays are run thru automatic plagiarism / ai checkers on the reg literally just assume that your shit has been flagged, at least once and probably routinely. functional system

[qqueenofhades]

I’m in undergrad but I keep hearing and seeing people talking about using chatgpt for their schoolwork and it makes me want to rip my hair out lol. Like even the “radical” anti-chatgpt ones are like “Oh yea it’s only good for outlines I’d never use it for my actual essay.” You’re using it for OUTLINES????? That’s the easy part!! I can’t wait to get to grad school and hopefully be surrounded by people who actually want to be there 😭😭😭

Not to sound COMPLETELY like a grumpy old codger (although lbr, I am), but I think this whole AI craze is the obvious result of an education system that prizes "teaching for the test" as the most important thing, wherein there are Obvious Correct Answers that if you select them, pass the standardized test and etc etc mean you are now Educated. So if there's a machine that can theoretically pick the correct answers for you by recombining existing data without the hard part of going through and individually assessing and compiling it yourself, Win!

... but of course, that's not the way it works at all, because AI is shown to create misleading, nonsensical, or flat-out dangerously incorrect information in every field it's applied to, and the errors are spotted as soon as an actual human subject expert takes the time to read it closely. Not to go completely KIDS THESE DAYS ARE JUST LAZY AND DONT WANT TO WORK, since finding a clever way to cheat on your schoolwork is one of those human instincts likewise old as time and has evolved according to tools, technology, and educational philosophy just like everything else, but I think there's an especial fear of Being Wrong that drives the recourse to AI (and this is likewise a result of an educational system that only prioritizes passing standardized tests as the sole measure of competence). It's hard to sort through competing sources and form a judgment and write it up in a comprehensive way, and if you do it wrong, you might get a Bad Grade! (The irony being, of course, that AI will *not* get you a good grade and will be marked even lower if your teachers catch it, which they will, whether by recognizing that it's nonsense or running it through a software platform like Turnitin, which is adding AI detection tools to its usual plagiarism checkers.)

We obviously see this mindset on social media, where Being Wrong can get you dogpiled and/or excluded from your peer groups, so it's even more important in the minds of anxious undergrads that they aren't Wrong. But yeah, AI produces nonsense, it is an open waste of your tuition dollars that are supposed to help you develop these independent college-level analytical and critical thinking skills that are very different from just checking exam boxes, and relying on it is not going to help anyone build those skills in the long term (and is frankly a big reason that we're in this mess with an entire generation being raised with zero critical thinking skills at the exact moment it's more crucial than ever that they have them). I am mildly hopeful that the AI craze will go bust just like crypto as soon as the main platforms either run out of startup funding or get sued into oblivion for plagiarism, but frankly, not soon enough, there will be some replacement for it, and that doesn't mean we will stop having to deal with fake news and fake information generated by a machine and/or people who can't be arsed to actually learn the skills and abilities they are paying good money to acquire. Which doesn't make sense to me, but hey.

So: Yes. This. I feel you and you have my deepest sympathies. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to sit on the porch in my quilt-draped rocking chair and shout at kids to get off my lawn.

[wordsandrobots]

A couple of years ago, I attended a (virtual) conference where one of the main topics was the impact of so-called 'AI' tools on my particular industry. I work in scholarly publishing (on the publisher side -- I know, I know; for what it's worth, I am at least at a company that's actively trying to drive reform, is anti-impact factor, tries to reinforce the value of the work over the journal name, etc) and the application of 'generative AI' to facilitate plagiarism/fake papers is an obvious risk in this sector. Such software could easily be used to overwhelm the (meagre) defences journals have against such things, especially with the pressures placed on academics to get their work into 'high impact' publications above all else. The threat of 'paper-mills' (operations paid to seek publication by fraudulent means) ramping up via the use of ChatGP was clear and present amid those heady days of the initial hype-push.

What's stuck with me from that conference is a panel participant pointing out that 'AI' hasn't created any *new* problems; it's just accelerated existing ones. That is, fraud in science and science publishing has been an issue as long as scholarly publishing has existed as an industry. You don't need a fancy tool to generate you a fake paper. It helps, no doubt, but it's not a necessary step. And yes, it makes detection harder. But the actual solution here -- the way to put a stop to fake papers, dodgy authorship claims, and all the other variations on trying to beef up an academic's publication record for career gains -- doesn't lie in some technological arms-race between plagiarism-detection and paper-fabrication. We need to change the culture. We need to put a stop to the rewards for this kind of behaviour, by assessing academics by the actual value and quality of their research, without the proxy-step provided by place of publication.

(For the uninitiated, it is a huge problem in science that certain journals -- such as the big three of Nature, Cell and Science -- are seen as *the* place where groundbreaking research is published. Not only does this expose the English-language bias within global research, it creates the idea that to 'make it', you must publish somewhere like that, rather than just, you know, doing good solid work. Journals, big name or not, also have a history of selecting for headline-making research. So on the one hand, institutions are judging their employees' careers by their citations, not their work, and on the other, you absolutely cannot trust journals not to get dollar-signs in their eyes when someone comes along claiming that e.g. a certain vaccine actually causes an unrelated health condition. To pick a deliberate, very-specific example. On top of all this, peer review is *terrible* at catching faked results because it has to be approached in good-faith. Most of the time, fraud is only caught in hindsight, once the work has had time to circulate in the community, at which point wider damage has been done.)

Now, one of the reasons I haven't blogged much about so-called 'AI' is that my hatred for it is pre-rational. What I mean is, I hate 'generative AI' with the power of a thousand burning suns. I hate it on a conceptual level. The idea of feeding real people's work, their art, into a machine and have it churn out an approximation of that same work and art is abhorrent to me. I view it as a mockery of skills I have devoted my life to. If it could produce truly breathtaking imagery and crystal-sharp prose, I would still feel the same revulsion at the thought of removing intent from an act of communication, at the idea we should be content with bathetic mirrors in place of engaging with actual human beings and what they can do.

Separate from this, I believe there is good cause to be highly doubtful about the tools that have been pushed on the public over the last few years. I haven't used them myself (see above) but everything I've seen suggests they just aren't very good. It's painfully obvious how they can be/will be/are being used to devalue people's labour, thus strengthening corporations. There's the destruction of the information ecosystem that comes from integrating software intended to reproduce tone instead of facts into major search engines. There's the impact on the actual ecosystem of pouring resources and power into this technology. There's the simple detail that a lot of the people pushing this stuff are, frankly, just the worst.

However, I am extremely, painfully aware I am the wrong person to make rational arguments against these tools because what's actually driving my objection is disgust. I'm going to assume the worst about this particular kind of automation simply on the basis that I can't stand its existence.

There may be good, productive uses for this kind of technology! I can't tell you what they might be because I'm too busy looking for the bit where my worst opinions are validated. That's where I am on this. I actively have to guard my tongue around some of my colleagues, to keep from railing at how gullible I think they're being, buying into these things.

So yeah. Not a good place for making solid arguments. But that point from two years ago -- 'AI' is not creating any new problems.

I think it's easy to lose track of that. Consider the environmental impact. In order for you to read this, some server, somewhere, needs to be powered and cooled. The device you are reading this on is likely made from relatively rare materials that have a history of being source via destructive means (both to the environment and the people involved in the extraction process). I don't say that as a guilt-trip; I'm writing this via the same means. It's simply that the current landscape of our societies is dependent on things that comes at a cost to the planet and our fellow humans. That cost is made worse by rampant capitalism, but even under ideal conditions, mitigating it will require rethinking massive amounts of infrastructure.

This is not an excuse to make things worse. I want to be very clear about that. Nor am I claiming these issues are insoluble. It's simply a good example of 'AI' being an exaggerated case of an existing problem, namely how to balance the utility of modern communication technology against the extractive activity required to build it. As with many things, the glib answer is 'don't do capitalism' and, well, err, that kind of is the answer, reorientating away from the maximisation of profit above all else and from 'endless growth' doctrine. But crucially, that answer has nothing to do with 'AI'. If the hype-train collapsed tomorrow and everyone realised they've been buying snake-oil, and somehow the tech sector didn't collectively burn to the ground about it, we'd still have a problem to solve.

Because the problem isn't new.

That 'summarisation' tool Google or Adobe have swung on you, that shortens text with no regard for the actual information contained within what it's reducing is not some novel horror; it's just an acceleration of the same approach to design that sees 'engagement' as the primary driver, detached from what is actually materially happening to cause everyone to flock to a single place. MidJourney or what-have-you, allowing X or Y group to churn out endless cloying representations of their ideal reality, is just bad Photoshop composites with less effort required on the part of the person pushing the button. People will airbrush reality whether they have to do it with a prompt or an actual airbrush. We know this! Thomas Kinkade made a whole flipping career off it! It's the heart of mass-media advertising, to cheaply reproduce visions of simpler worlds for the sake of selling you something.

The truth is, grifters are going to grift, with whatever tools they have at their disposal. As long as there is a market for snake-oil, an incentive to cheat, a reason for people to be dissatisfied with their lot, there is going to be space for someone to sell an everything-app. A quick solution. An easy fix. We don't address that by playing whack-a-mole with every single dumb vapourware 'solution' that results; we address it by collapsing the space that permits those things to find their marks.

I think it is an objectively bad thing if paper-mills can work faster and easier and flood journal submissions with more junk than ever before. But it is also objectively bad for academia to be held hostage by a for-profit system that silos and constrains their work while being treated as the bar for judging how well they are doing their jobs. And the latter is the problem that actually *needs* to be solved, if we're going to have a hope of addressing the former.

Anyway, thank you for coming to this edition of 'Words sorts through his disgust to work out if there's a sensible position obscured beneath, for the sake of not being a raging arsehole to people who like shiny toys and haven't been in a love-hate relationship with their ability to draw for thirty years'.

[drillbitplagiarismchecker]

Plagiarism Checker Software | Plagiarism Detection Software | Drillbit

DrillBit - Plagiarism Detection Software has been selected for empanelment with AICTE NEAT 3.0. We are pleased to announce the successful signing of an MoU with AICTE – NEAT (National Education Alliance for Technology) scheme, making us a technology partner with AICTE NEAT, and contributing towards enhanced learning outcomes in India.

Discover how to make your material more original by using our effective plagiarism detector. Quickly identify any copied content and confirm that your work is original. You may be sure that your work and academic standing are safe with our plagiarism detection software. Try our plagiarism checker software now to have a trustworthy and original online presence.

Phone: +91 9738218506 Mail: sales@drillbitplagiarism.com Address: #92/4, RAC Tower, Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 560085

Plagiarism Checker Software | Plagiarism Detection Software | Drillbit

[fandomhype]

Plagiarism Somerton

I obviously didn't watch the new James Somerton apology video ON his channel because I did not want to give that man the views and you shouldn't either! It has been re-uploaded and summarised elsewhere so that he doesn't benefit if anyone wants to see it.

The original hbomberguy video was wild to me because of all the stealing, I found it highly entertaining, loved all the Memes and it honestly did my imposter syndrome wonders! but then I watched the Todd in the shadows video and it really upset me.

He didn't just steal from other LGBT creators he lied to his mostly young LGBT audiance who were looking to an elder gay for guidance and to learn about their history.

Todd's video starts with a clip of James lies being spread by another person on a podcast, there's clips of people discussing his made up gay nazi fanfic he has presented as hard facts. He actively harmed his own community for cash! There are young gay men bringing that subject up in conversation being laughed at for falling for it and that leaves a really bad taste in my mouth.

Now I'm not a part of that community but a lot of people I love are so that angered me a lot.

...and then he comes back with another apology video, conveniently within the three months he would have had to post something on his channel to retain his monetisation status weirdly?! In which he blames both a head injury and his ADHD for his theft - at no point does he address the lying in either apology video or any of the apology posts he made that I could find.

I have combined ADHD, when I was first diagnosed the NHS referred to it as ADD with Hyperactivity element but everyone seems to have gone back to calling it ADHD and that is the term used most commonly online so that is what I refer to it is as.

I am medicated but there has been a world wide shortage of my medication and I was without it for some time over winter, which was HELL! I got nothing done.

I am in no way a big creator, Youtube for me is a fun wee hobby that will hopefully grow and allow me to collaborate with other people with similar interests but ADHD is for sure a large part of my journey as a creator.

I've published like 7 videos and currently have around 10 being worked on because, you know... ADHD! *siren noises*

I know that I am forgetful sometimes, just for the record I also had several head injuries and concussions as a child because Lil undiagnosed at the time me truly had no fear of climbing or other dangerous activities so I have my script (because free talking a subject with this brain would be nearly impossible) open in one google doc and my research open in another. It's not hard.

That's the way it was at school, college and Uni too. James claims he went to Uni to do business. Every university uses anti-plagerism software for essays and has done since like the mid 2000's? so he knows not to copy pasta. He's straight up lying there.

Another thing he's lying about is his ADHD making him forget he copied things. Now if you tell me a joke that I like it'll stick in my head and I will straight up tell it as my own later, I've been called out for this many times! But entire articles? whole sections of other peoples videos? (he also flipped a fan Vid he had ripped off of another YouTube to avoid detection and tried to pass it off as his own) No that's not something you can accidentally do even with a swiss cheese brain like mine.

Weirdly all the the paragraphs James claims he accidentally copied were also edited to remove aspects of the Trans, Bi and Ace experiences that James markedly does not believe exist. Strange considering he accidentally copied them and assumed they were his own words? Imagine going back through a paragraph you think you wrote yesterday in the edit the next day and finding swarths of things you don't agree with there?!

Why am I telling you all this? Well because I wanted to put my two cents in as a creator with this condition, partly because I felt it was somewhat of an attack on us!? He's put it out there that ADHD creators are liable to steal from others and that's not ok by me. Also I just really like the sound of my own typing!

TL;DR : James Sommerton is a suck ass liar and he doesn't get to use his disability as an excuse for what he did! and...

****** ADHD DOES NOT MAKE YOU STEAL SHIT!!! ******

Also watch Todd's Vid, everyone saw the Hbomberguy one but this one goes deeper:

[sharpth1ng]

"chatgpt writing is bad because you can tell when it's chatgpt writing because chatgpt writing is bad". in reality the competent kids are using chatgpt well and the incompetent kids are using chatgpt poorly... like with any other tool.

It's not just like other tools. Calculators and computers and other kinds of automation don't require you to steal the hard work of other people who deserve recognition and compensation. I dont know why I have to keep reminding people of this.

It also uses an exorbitant amount of energy and water during an environmental crisis and it's been linked to declining cognitive skills. The competent kids are becoming less competent by using it and they're fucked when we require in-class essays.

Specifically, it can enhance your writing output and confidence but it decreases creativity, originality, critical thinking, reading comprehension, and makes you prone to data bias. Remember, AI privileges the most common answers, which are often out of date and wrong when it comes to scientific and sociological data. This results in reproduction of racism and sexist ideas, because guess whats common on the internet? Racism and sexism!

Heres a source (its a meta-analysis, so it aggregates data from a collection of studies. This means it has better statistical power than any single study, which could have been biased in a number of ways. Meta analysis= more data points, more data points= higher accuracy).

This study also considers positives of AI by the way, as noted it can increase writing efficiency but the downsides and ethical issues don't make that worthwhile in my opinion. We can and should enhance writing and confidence in other ways.

Heres another source:

The issue here is that if you rely on AI consistently, certain skills start to atrophy. So what happens when you can't use it?

Im not completely against all AI, there is legitimate possibility for ethical usage when its trained on paid for data sets and used for specific purpose. Ive seen good evidence for use in medical fields, and for enhancing language learning in certain ways. If we can find a way to reduce the energy and water consumption then cool.

But when you write essays with chatgpt you're just robbing yourself an opportunity to exercise valuable cognitive muscles and you're also robbing millions of people of the fruit of their own intellectual and creative property. Also like, on a purely aesthetic level it has such boring prose, it makes you sound exactly like everyone else and I actually appreciate a distinctive voice in a piece of writing.

It also often fails to cite ideas that belong to other people, which can get you an academic violation for plagiarism even if your writing isn't identified as AI. And by the way, AI detection software is only going to keep getting better in tandem with AI.

All that said it really doesn't matter to me how good it gets at faking human or how good people get at using it, I'm never going to support it because again, it requires mass scale intellectual theft and (at least currently) it involves an unnecessary energy expenditure. Like it's really not that complicated.

At the end of the day I would much rather know that I did my work. I feel pride in my writing because I know I chose every word, and because integrity matters to me.

This is the last post I'm making about this. If you send me another ask I'll block you and delete it. This space is meant to be fun for me and I don't want to engage in more bullshit discourse here.

[academicfever]

Research 101: Last part

#Citing sources and the bibliography:

Citation has various functions: ■■ To acknowledge work by other researchers. ■■ To anchor your own text in the context of different disciplines. ■■ To substantiate your own claims; sources then function like arguments with verification.

Use Mendeley:

It has a number of advantages in comparison to other software packages: (1) it is free, (2) it is user-friendly, (3) you can create references by dragging a PDF file into the program (it automatically extracts the author, title, year, etc.), (4) you can create references by using a browser plug-in to click on a button on the page where you found an article, (5) you can share articles and reference lists with colleagues, and (6) it has a ‘web importer’ to add sources rapidly to your own list.

plagiarism – and occasionally even fraud – are sometimes detected, too. In such cases, appeals to ignorance (‘I didn’t know that it was plagiarism’) are rarely accepted as valid reasons for letting the perpetrator off the hook.

#Peer review

For an official peer review of a scholarly article, 3-4 experts are appointed by the journal to which the article has been submitted. These reviewers give anonymous feedback on the article. As a reviewer, based on your critical reading, you can make one of the following recommendations to the editor of the journal: ■■Publish as submitted. The article is good as it is and can be published (this hardly ever happens). ■■Publish after minor revisions. The article is good and worth publishing, but some aspects need to be improved before it can be printed. If the adjustments can be made easily (for example, a small amount of rewriting, formatting figures), these are considered minor revisions. ■■Publish after major revisions. The article is potentially worth publishing, but there are significant issues that need to be reconsidered. For example, setting up additional (control) experiments, using a new method to analyse the data, a thorough review of the theoretical framework (addition of important theories), and gathering new information (in an archive) to substantiate the argumentation. ■■Reject. The research is not interesting, it is not innovative, or it has been carried out/written up so badly that this cannot be redressed.

#Checklist for analysing a research article or paper 1 Relevance to the field (anchoring) a What is the goal of the research or paper? b To what extent has this goal been achieved? c What does the paper or research article add to knowledge in the field? d Are theories or data missing? To what extent is this a problem? 2 Methodology or approach a What approach has been used for the research? b Is this approach consistent with the aim of the research? c How objective or biased is this approach? d How well has the research been carried out? What are the methodological strengths and/or weaknesses? e Are the results valid and reliable? 3 Argumentation and use of evidence a Is there a clear description of the central problem, objective, or hypothesis? b What claims are made? c What evidence underlies the argument? d How valid and reliable is this evidence? e Is the argumentation clear and logical? f Are the conclusions justified? 4 Writing style and structure of the text a Is the style of the text suitable for the medium/audience? b Is the text structured clearly, so the reader can follow the writer’s line of argumentation? c Are the figures and tables displayed clearly?

#Presenting ur research:

A few things are always important, in any case, when it comes to guiding the audience through your story: ■■ Make a clear distinction between major and minor elements. What is the key theme of your story, and which details does your audience need in order to understand it? ■■ A clearly structured, coherent story. ■■ Good visual aids that represent the results visually. ■■ Good presentation skills.

TIPS ■■Find out everything about the audience that you’ll be presenting your story to, and look at how you can ensure that your presentation is relevant for them.

Ask yourself the following questions: •What kind of audience will you have (relationship with audience)? •What does the audience already know about your topic and how can you connect with this (knowledge of the audience)? •What tone or style should you adopt vis-à-vis the audience (style of address)? •What do you want the audience to take away from your presentation?

■■If you know there is going to be a round of questions, include some extra slides for after the conclusion. You can fill these extra slides with all kinds of detailed information that you didn’t have time for during the presentation. If you’re on top of your material, you’ll be able to anticipate which questions might come up. It comes over as very professional if you’re able to back up an answer to a question from the audience with an extra graph or table, for example.

■■Think about which slide will be shown on the screen as you’re answering questions at the end of your presentation. A slide with a question mark is not informative. It’s more useful for the audience if you end with a slide with the main message and possibly your contact details, so that people are able to contact you later. ■■Think beforehand about what you will do if you’re under time pressure. What could you say more succinctly or even omit altogether?

This has a number of implications for a PowerPoint presentation: ■■ Avoid distractions that take up cognitive space, such as irrelevant images, sounds, too much text/words on a slide, intense colours, distracting backgrounds, and different fonts. ■■ Small chunks of information are easier to understand and remember. This is the case for both the text on a slide and for illustrations, tables, and graphs. ■■ When you are talking to your audience, it is usually better to show a slide with a picture than a slide with a lot of text. What you should do: ■■ Ensure there is sufficient contrast between your text and the background. ■■ Ensure that all of the text is large enough (at least 20 pt). ■■ Use a sans-serif font; these are the easiest to read when enlarged. ■■ Make the text short and concise. Emphasize the most important concepts by putting them in bold or a different colour. ■■ Have the texts appear one by one on the slide, in sync with your story. This prevents the audience from ‘reading ahead’. ■■ Use arrows, circles, or other ways of showing which part of an illustration, table, or graph is important. You can also choose to fade out the rest of the image, or make a new table or graph showing only the relevant information.

A good presentation consists of a clear, substantive story, good visual aids, and effective presentation techniques.

Stand with both feet firmly on the ground.

Use your voice and hand gestures.

Make eye contact with all of your audience.

Add enough pauses/use punctuation.

Silences instead of fillers.

Think about your position relative to your audience and the screen.

Explaining figures and tables.

Keep your hands calm.

Creating a safe atmosphere

Do not take a position yourself. This limits the discussion, because it makes it trickier to give a dissenting opinion.

You can make notes on a whiteboard or blackboard, so that everyone can follow the key points.

Make sure that you give the audience enough time to respond.

Respond positively to every contribution to the discussion, even if it doesn’t cut any ice.

Ensure that your body language is open and that you rest your arms at your sides.

#Points to bear in mind when designing a poster

TIPS 1 Think about what your aim is: do you want to pitch a new plan, or do you want to get your audience interested in your research? 2 Explain what you’ve done/are going to do: focus on the problem that you’ve solved/want to solve, or the question that you’ve answered. Make it clear why it is important to solve this problem or answer this question. 3 Explain what makes your approach unique. 4 Involve your audience in the conversation by concluding with an open question. For example: how do you research…? Or, after a pitch for a method to tackle burnout among staff: how is burnout dealt with in your organization?

[groupbuyseotools450]

🚀 Get Premium SEO Tools for Cheap with GroupBuySEOTools! 🚀

Tired of paying full price for expensive SEO tools? groupbuyseotools offers affordable group buy access to top tools like Ahrefs, SEMrush, Moz, Copyleaks, Freepik, Shutterstock, and more!

🔹 Why Choose GroupBuySEOTools? ✅ Cheaper than individual subscriptions ✅ Instant access after purchase ✅ Regular updates & reliable service

📌 Explore Their Offers:

SEO Tools Packages – Best deals on bundled tools

Shop All Tools – SEMrush, Ahrefs, SpyFu & more

ShareTools – Split costs with others

Copyleaks Group Buy – Plagiarism detection at low cost

Freepik Group Buy – Premium graphics & vectors

Shutterstock Group Buy – High-quality stock images

📢 Exclusive Discounts:

May Discount Codes

Latest Promo Codes

📖 Learn More:

Blog – SEO tips & updates

Contact Support – Need help?

💡 Stop overpaying—join the group buy revolution today!

ahrefs group buy, group buy seo tools ahrefs, seo group buy ahrefs, buy seo, ahrefs seo group buy, group buy ahrefs, group buy seo tools, seo group buy, seo tools group buy, group buy seo, ahrefs tool cheap price, semrush group buy, ahrefs group buy india, group buy seo tool, group share seo tools ahrefs, seo group buy tools, ahrefs group buy tool, groupbuy, group buy software, group buy internet marketing tools, ahrefs group buy seo, ahrefs group buy seo tools, best group buy seo tools, moz ahrefs buzzsumo adbeat alexa, bundle seo tools, ahrefs buy group, seo buy, ahrefs groupbuy, group buy, internet marketing group buy, best group buy tools, ahrefs share account buy bangladesh, seo tool group buy, seo tools cheap, group seo, group seo tool, buy seo tools, moz ahrefs buzz sumo adbeat alexa powtoon junglescout, best group buy seo tools india, group buy seo tools india, groupbuyseo, seogroup buy, group seo tool buy, seotoolsgroupbuy, ahref group buy, best group buy seo, seo tools group, group buy seo ahrefs, buy seo tools in pakistan, groupseotool, ahrefs for group buy, seo tools buy, group seo tools, groupbyseotools, groupbuyseotools store, secure.groupbuyseotools, groupbuyseotool, groupbyseo, seo tools group buy us, group buy india, cheap group buy seo tools, group buying seo tools, seo tools bulk buy, groupbuy tools, seo tools group buy india, premium group buy seo tools provider, best group buy seo tools service, group buy seo tools bd, group buy seo tools pakistan, vip seo tools, seo group

Groupbuyseotools

Groupbuyseotools

Groupbuyseotools

Groupbuyseotools

Groupbuyseotools

Groupbuyseotools

Groupbuyseotools

Groupbuyseotools

groupbuyseotools

#SEO #DigitalMarketing #SEOTools #GroupBuy #AffordableSEO #SEMrush #Ahrefs #Freepik #Shutterstock

[femperor]

Somebody needs to make one of those plagiarism detecting softwares for niche spiritual ideologies. I should be able to punch in whatever facts of the universe I divined from my latest dissociative episode and see if there's already been a church about it.