#over 2000 questions survey series part 7 | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

patriotsnet · 3 years

Text

Why Do Republicans Support The Death Penalty

New Post has been published on https://www.patriotsnet.com/why-do-republicans-support-the-death-penalty/

Why Do Republicans Support The Death Penalty

A Change In Philosophy

Do You Support The Death Penalty? Public Opinion POLL Released

Conservatives have been slowly turning away from the death penalty for years, as high-profile innocence cases have helped frame capital punishment as a problem of out-of-control big government.

In January 2000, after a series of exonerations of people who had been sentenced to death, the Republican governor of Illinois, George Ryan, declared a moratorium on executions. At the time, Texas Gov. George W. Bush was running for president, and the national press questioned whether an innocent person had faced execution under his watch; soon after, his fellow Republicans in the state legislature voted to make DNA testing more available for prisoners.

From 2014 to 2019, Republican support for the death penalty, as opposed to life sentences, dropped from 68% to 58%, according to Gallup Polls. Republican legislators in Nebraska voted to repeal the punishment in 2015, although the states residents then voted to bring the punishment back.

Some lawmakers have been motivated by anti-abortion arguments about the sanctity of human life and stories of Christian redemption on death row. Others talk about the cost to taxpayers. South Dakota state Sen. Arthur Rusch previously served as a judge in a capital case.

When I look at a bill, I dont see color at all. I look at an individual and say, If an individual commits a crime of this nature, should they be put on death row or not? he said.

Abortion Deliberately Ends A Human Life

To treat abortion-minded mothers and abortionist as murderers is not a wild stretch. In Ohio, many believe this is appropriate, and that the woman and abortionist who knowingly violate natural and written law should be punished for ending a human life. Setting that punishment is not easy.

It is plain that abortion ends the life of an innocent human person, who has committed no wrong, has no right to a defender, and is afforded no due process or given the benefit of appeals. She can be destroyed by the whim of a pregnant woman and abortionist. By contrast, the death penalty ends the life of a guilty person, who has willfully committed a known wrong, and was afforded all the due process possible before being put to death.

To see these versions of ending a life as categorically different, and to abhor the first and support the second is not hypocrisy. To some, it is common sense.

Executions Are Mostly A Red

Gov. Gavin Newsom is expected on Wednesday to issue a moratorium on the death penalty in California, granting reprieves to the hundreds of people on death row. By signing his executive order, Newsom will lower the countrys death row population by a quarter.

The move isnt particularly surprising considering the Democrats record as an elected official he was an early proponent of same-sex marriage as mayor of San Francisco and considering Californias politics. Nor should it be surprising that President Trump weighed in Wednesday morning to oppose Newsoms move.

Defying voters, the Governor of California will halt all death penalty executions of 737 stone cold killers, Trump said. Friends and families of the always forgotten VICTIMS are not thrilled, and neither am I!

The death penalty is not a new entrant to the political culture wars, but in recent years, the partisan split on the issue has widened. A Pew Research Center poll completed last year found that a small majority of Americans support the death penalty but that those views were split by party. More than three-quarters of Republicans support executions while only about a third of Democrats agree.

Among the groups most supportive of the issue are white evangelical Protestants; more than 7 in 10 support the use of the death penalty.

In 2014, support for the death penalty among Democrats dropped under 50 percent in Pews polling, the first year in which that happened.

Read Also: Who’s Right Democrats Or Republicans

Republican States Have Most Prisoner Executions

Thirty-two states have the death penalty on their legal code. Republican-dominated states have performed an enormous majority of U.S. prisoner executions since 1976. Of the 1,359 executions since that date — the number reported by the Death Penalty Information Center as of Dec. 18, 2013 — 1,110 occurred in Republican-dominated Southern states. About one-third of those sentences were in Texas, where 508 death row inmates have been put to death in the past 37 years. Twelve people who were eventually proved innocent were released from the state’s death row during that period.

references

Conservatives And The Death Penalty

Some conservatives including Michelle Malkin, Jay Sekulow, and me oppose capital punishment. But most conservatives and Republicans support it, and their support hasnt really softened over the years, as Charles Fain Lehman demonstrates at the Free Beacon. In 2000, 70 percent of Republicans supported it. In 2009, 70 percent of Republicans did. And in 2018, again, it had 70 percent support. The drop in crime rates, changes in the composition of the party, the publicity about people taken off death row after years on it: None of it seems to have caused Republicans to budge.

You May Like: Republican Primary Popular Vote Totals

George Bush On The Death Penalty

Former President Bush is a supporter of the death penalty, though he does believe that DNA testing should be implemented before the death penalty is used. He stated, In America, we must make doubly sure no person is held to account for a crime he or she did not commit, so we are dramatically expanding the use of DNA evidence to prevent wrongful conviction. He also supported funding the use of DNA testing for use in death penalty cases. During Bushs time as governor of Texas, the state had the most executions in the nation. When asked about this number, Bush responded, I do believe that if the death penalty is administered swiftly, justly and fairly, it saves lives. My job is to ask two questions. Is the person guilty of the crime? And did the person have full access to the courts of law? And I can tell you, in all cases those answers were affirmative. Unlike some other Republicans, who support the death penalty for the sake of victims and their families, Bush supports it as a means to prevent future crimes. He has stated, I dont think you should support the death penalty to seek revenge. I dont think thats right. I think the reason to support the death penalty is because it saves other peoples lives.

The Latest From Washington

When Congress returns from its Memorial Day recess, Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer says the chamber will take up measures to set national standards for elections, which, at least for federal elections, would override state laws that limit voting. Republicans are expected to filibuster the proposals.

The bills the Democrats support aim, in part, to overturn several Supreme Court rulings that, as David Savage wrote, have tilted election law in favor of the Republicans.

Biden and Sen. Shelley Moore Capito continued on Wednesday to try to chip away at the impasse on infrastructure spending. The gap between the two sides remains very wide, however, as Eli Stokols reported, and patience has begun to wear thin at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.

Doyle McManus looked at the rewards for getting COVID-19 vaccinations that some states are offering. They may help get the U.S. to its vaccination goals, but lotteries alone probably wont do the trick, he wrote.

You May Like: Why Are Republicans Wearing Blue Ties

Barack Obama On The Death Penalty

President Obama is a supporter of the death penalty in certain cases, stating, I believe that the death penalty is appropriate in certain circumstances. There are extraordinarily heinous crimes, terrorism, the harm of children, in which it may be appropriate. However, he voted against expanding the death penalty in cases of less severe crimes during his time as a state legislator. He does not believe that the death penalty prevents crime, but rather believes that these crimes simply deserve such a punishment. Obama states, While the evidence tells me that the death penalty does little to deter crime, I believe there are some crimesmass murder, the rape and murder of a childso heinous, so beyond the pale, that the community is justified in expressing the full measure of its outrage by meting out the ultimate punishment.

Obama called the incident in Oklahoma deeply disturbing, and has asked for a review of execution policies across the country. A Justice Department spokesperson has stated that the department will expand this review to include a survey of state-level protocols and related policy issues.

Republican Views On Death Penalty

New Coalition supports death penalty repeal

About 81 percent of Republicans favor the death penalty, making up a majority of Americans who support the practice. Republican supporters often argue that capital punishment deters murder because no one wants to face the consequence of death, an assertion the American Civil Liberties Union reports is not based on fact. Although some question the morality of sentencing a human to death, those in favor of the death penalty argue the punishment is morally acceptable for certain crimes, such as rape or murder.

Recommended Reading: Republican Wear Red Or Blue

Why Does The Republican Party Support The Death Penalty And Oppose Abortion The Reason Is Economics Not Ethics

The recent experience with the novel coronavirus and the economic effects of the shutdown gives us all an opportunity to calculate how much the pro-life party values life. Approximately 30 million Americans lost their jobs because of the coronavirus pandemic. The shutdown if continued through the phased reopening without being rushed will save perhaps 1 million American lives. It follows that to the politicians who wished to end the shutdown in the early summer, one life to them is worth not more than about 30 jobs. It also explains the Republican fascination with the death penalty. If the average death penalty case costs about $100,000 to try, which we can evaluate as equal to roughly 2 jobs for a year, but if only one out of every 40 people convicted of a death penalty crime is actually executed, then each execution produces roughly 80 jobs, a very decent return on investment from this coldly capitalist point of view.

Arguments Against The Death Penalty Haven’t Changed

Antonio has urged an end to the death penalty in Ohio since taking office in 2011, without much support from Republican lawmakers, though her bill last session had two Republican co-sponsors.;

Its time for the state of Ohio to take the compassionate, pragmatic and prudent step to abolish the death penalty, which has been found to be expensive, impractical, unjust, inhumane and even erroneous, Antonio said.

Backers of the bill noted the legal process in death penalty cases takes decades, and the resulting costs are more expensive than the cost to keep inmates in prison for life. Huffman noted that a life sentence without parole or early release offers “no easy way out” for a killer.

Life in prison is a terminal sentence,” Huffman said. “It gives families the assurance that the person who murdered their loved ones will spend the rest of their natural life behind bars.”

They pointed to disparities in the administration of capital punishment for people of color and the possibility of putting those innocent of crimes to death.

Wrongful convictions happen at every level of the criminal legal system, but when there is a life on the line, the system has to work, said Hannah Kubbins, executive director of Ohioans to Stop Executions. The 170-plus exonerees are living proof that it doesnt.

Granted, the arguments against the death penalty havent changed. But, Antonio said, there’s been a shift in Ohio and nationally.

Reporter Anna Staver contributed.

You May Like: How Many States Are Controlled By Republicans

Differing Views Of Death Penalty By Race And Ethnicity Education Ideology

There are wide ideological differences within both parties on this issue. Among Democrats, a 55% majority of conservatives and moderates favor the death penalty, a position held by just 36% of liberal Democrats . A third of liberal Democrats strongly oppose the death penalty, compared with just 14% of conservatives and moderates.

While conservative Republicans are more likely to express support for the death penalty than moderate and liberal Republicans, clear majorities of both groups favor the death penalty .

As in the past, support for the death penalty differs across racial and ethnic groups. Majorities of White , Asian and Hispanic adults favor the death penalty for persons convicted of murder. Black adults are evenly divided: 49% favor the death penalty, while an identical share oppose it.

Support for the death penalty also varies across age groups. About half of those ages 18 to 29 favor the death penalty, compared with about six-in-ten adults ages 30 to 49 and those 65 and older . Adults ages 50 to 64 are most supportive of the death penalty, with 69% in favor.

There are differences in attitudes by education, as well. Nearly seven-in-ten adults who have not attended college favor the death penalty, as do 63% of those who have some college experience but no degree.

The Latest From California

COVID-19 restrictions protected Californias economy, and its now poised for a euphoric rebound, according to the UCLA Anderson quarterly forecast. As Margot Roosevelt reported, Californias economy shrank less than the U.S. average during the pandemic year, and the UCLA forecasters expect the state to add jobs faster than the country as a whole.

California, however, also had huge problems delivering unemployment benefits to those who lost their jobs. As Sarah Wire and Patrick McGreevy wrote, a new report by the U.S. Department of Labors inspector general chronicles missteps by a dozen state unemployment agencies around the country, including California, which left millions in the lurch.

Meantime, state lawmakers considered requiring $7 billion in COVID-19 bonuses for healthcare workers. As Melody Gutierrez reported, hospitals, which estimate they would have to pay about $4 billion, strongly opposed the plan. On Thursday, the state Assembly .

Lawmakers to pay for programs to prevent gun violence, McGreevy reported. The measure fell short of the two-thirds vote it needed.

San Luis Obispo County delivered a sizable block of signatures on petitions to recall Newsom. Faith Pinho looked at how COVID restrictions helped fuel the recall drive in a decidedly purple region.

Stay in touch

You May Like: Trump Quote Republicans Dumb

Can The Death Penalty Be Fixed These Republicans Think So

A growing number of conservative lawmakers want to overhaul capital punishment, or end it.

Two years ago, a group of Republican lawmakers toured the death chamber in Oklahoma, which has been responsible for more executions per capita than any other state in the last half-century. They took in the jet-black gurney straps, the phone connected to the governors office and the microphone used for last words.

The hair rises on the back of your neck, said state Rep. Kevin McDugle. A few legislators couldnt be in the room very long.

They continued on to death row to see Richard Glossip, who has spent more than two decades in solitary confinement, facing execution for a 1997 murder. Glossip says he had nothing to do with the crime, and a growing number of conservative lawmakers believe him.

I just remember putting my hand up on the glass, McDugle recalled, and he put his hand up, and I said, You’ve got people fighting for you. Keep your head up, brother.

As Oklahoma officials seek to resume putting prisoners to death later this year, McDugle has pursued bills in the state legislature to help those on death row prove their innocence, knowing Glossip could be among the first facing execution.

My fear is some people will be executed before we pass a bill, McDugle said.

Kansas House Members Conservative To Liberal Support Abolishing The Death Penalty

C.J. Janovy

Wilma Loganbills son David was murdered in 1989 in Wichita. Afterwards, I wanted to hurt the person who murdered my son in the same way that he hurt me. But I never wanted him dead. My son wouldnt have wanted that, she said in a pamphlet called Voices of Kansas: Murder Victims Families Speak Out Against the Death Penalty.

If you were looking for a group of 34 members of the Kansas House who represented the best hope of bipartisanship that mythical yet evasive unity some people say they want right now you could would find it in the list of sponsors for a bill thats most likely going nowhere this year.

Rui Xu

In one sense, this does not appear to be a pressing issue for Kansas. Nobodys been executed in the state since 1965. The U.S. Supreme Court outlawed the death penalty in 40 states in 1972, but the Legislature re-instated it in 1994. Ten men are now awaiting this punishment.

In another sense, though, its a situation maybe the only one where lawmakers whose political views are widely divergent have found common cause based on principle.

Some of them are bringing strong voices against abortion and they dont see much difference in the abortion issue and this death penalty issue, Schreiber said of his co-sponsors. Some see it as social justice issue like I do, where, is this the right thing to be involved with deliberately executing people?

We make a mistake and theres no redress on that, he said.

Republishing Guidelines

Read Also: Who Gives More Democrats Or Republicans

Stanley: A Conservative Viewpoint On Ending The Death Penalty

Bill Stanley

This is a Virginia Department of Corrections undated photo of the gurney used for executions at the Greensville Corrections Center in Jarratt.

I am a conservative Republican, and I am against the death penalty.

During the ten years I have been privileged to represent the 20th District in the Virginia Senate, I have consistently opposed efforts to expand it. That may seem counter-intuitive for those who assume conservatives must support the death penalty as a key component of Republicans tough on crime stance. In my view, you can be tough on crime, be a conservative Republican, and be against the death penalty for both moral and legal reasons.

Opposition to capital punishment is not just a personal belief of mine, but is consistent with my conservative principles. This reasoning is based upon three basic principles: my strong faith in God and the gift of life; my appreciation that our judicial system is not infallible; and my firm belief that capital punishment empowers the government with an awesome authority to which it is not entitled.

In theory, the death penalty makes sense: people who commit heinous acts forfeit their right to live. And as human beings, vengeance has become a part of our emotional lexicon in seeking justice for the unconscionable murder of another human being. However, the death penalty in practice is not that simple.

1 note · View note

atas8wrld · 3 years

Text

Week 3: Future Thinking Tool Kit & Storytelling with Data

What global misconceptions did you have that were false or true?

The last of eighteen questions based on common misconceptions about The United Nations goals related to the total amount of raw materials used across the world annually, since 2000. I assumed that it stayed about the same but actually it has increased to about 70%. Over half of the people who took this survey got this question wrong. Thus, this alludes to the concern that presumably, most people are probably completely unaware of how bad the worlds state of consumption really is. The resource furthers this concern as the increase of consumption is not due to increasing population but that more people are becoming richer. Research shows that the increase is 3 times higher than the population growth over the past 20years. Ironically said, it seems as if when one problem solves itself, another is created. Which makes me think about my own motives to be wealthy as well as to be more conscious about my own styles of consumption. Ultimately, it is the misconception in itself and trends like buying more from Amazon or places like K-Mart (as a personal example) that are cushioning the major issue like a soft blanket. Not to be naïve, a massive part of the problem is that we think we can’t trust the data when in fact we can (derived from a UN report Gapminder, n.d.), that we don’t know enough or don’t care. The reality is that our current reuse, recycle and reduce or presumable circular economy is way past falling short – by 20 years and at an increased 70% to be exact.

At this rate we’ll run out of natural resources and in doing so, destroy many natural habitats. So, we can say goodbye to our beautiful environmental makeup and say hello to more ‘stuff’.

Not enough people are taking this personally; people should be taking this issue personally. This calls for a lifestyle makeover and not only makes minimalism that much more appealing but then puts the concept of business as the lifeforce of consumption into question. In a quote I read today it said that businesses should never be about making money but that it should be about serving it’s people or else it shouldn’t even exist. I wonder what the future of business would look like in the next 30 years; picture the revitalisation of indigenous concepts of business, less desire for stuff and a fully propelled circular economy. It sounds good but that’s nothing short of a utopia. However, the whole point of this was to become aware and to take this particular issue personally.

#whatisyournewstyleofconsumptiongoingtolooklike?

#makeityourown.

#makeitpersonal.

Introduction to Data and Storytelling:

Data Visualisation is the graphic representations of data that makes complex information more visible, better accessible, and easier to interpret. We can understand trends, relationships, and patterns between data in more compelling ways when we can visualise it than if we were to view it as a report or in plain writing. Unlike traditional approaches such as report writing, data visualisations primarily use colours, shapes as well as language cues to share information. The cruciality between simplifying or condensing large and complex data is the capability to correctly inform than to mislead. Moreover, the data literacy skillset encourages communicators as well as information receivers to critically assess data sources by combining better reading and understanding with smarter use and communication.

Introduction to the Futures Thinking Toolkit.

The Futures of Thinking Toolkit is interesting because it promotes a way of thinking about the future. The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC) uses such design concepts along with a list of others to think about the future of New Zealand. Moreover, in the classroom, it can be a structured way to develop student’s futures thinking skills. This can be used in conjunction with system thinking approaches by observing and speculating mental models for the purpose of understanding past and present behaviours. Essentially, the toolkit supports analysis by offering prompt questions related to the creation of possible, probable, and preferable futures, whilst factoring in wild possibilities, drivers, trends and into the present of a given situation. Due to the fundamental tie and the interconnectedness of arguably all social and environmental problems my team and I chose to base our research on Sustainability and Climate Change in New Zealand. We will do this by first using elements of The Futures Thinking toolkit such as existing Situation, trends, and drivers to analyse impartial futures over the next 30 years.

Provide a documentation of your research issue on Sustainability and Climate Change; categorise your research on, Existing Situation, Trends and Drivers from the Futures Thinking Toolkit.

Existing Situation:

How NZ practices sustainability

https://theculturetrip.com/pacific/new-zealand/articles/100-pure-how-new-zealand-practices-sustainability-to-remain-one-of-the-worlds-least-polluted-countries/

Climate Change Impact in NZ

https://www.environment.govt.nz/assets/Publications/Files/impacts-report-jun01.pdf

Fossil Fuels explained

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/fossil-fuels

Auckland Climate Change Plan

https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/plans-projects-policies-reports-bylaws/our-plans-strategies/Pages/te-taruke-a-tawhiri-ACP.aspx#:~:text=Auckland's%20climate%20is%20changing.,events%20and%20sea%20level%20rise.&text=In%20December%202020%2C%20the%20government,also%20declared%20a%20climate%20emergency.

Trends:

Auckland Plan in 2050

https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/plans-projects-policies-reports-bylaws/our-plans-strategies/auckland-plan/Pages/default.aspx

Sustainability goals nz

https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/peace-rights-and-security/our-work-with-the-un/sustainable-development-goals/

Auckland Region Climate Change Projection

https://knowledgeauckland.org.nz/media/1171/tr2017-031-2-auckland-region-climate-change-projections-and-impacts-summary-revised-jan-2018.pdf

Drivers:

Auckland Plan 2050 Monitoring Framework

https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/plans-projects-policies-reports-bylaws/our-plans-strategies/auckland-plan/about-the-auckland-plan/Documents/fe-monitoring-framework.PDF

CHALLENGES FACING AUCKLAND BUSINESSES AND USING RECOVERY TO BUILD RESILIENCE

https://www.aucklandnz.com/sites/build_auckland/files/media-library/documents/Auckland-Economic-Insights-Series-ECCRA-Final.pdf

How the world thinks about climate change

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2019/09/17/how-does-everyone-feel-about-climate-change/?sh=17dbf3694051

What causes the Earth's climate to change?

https://www.bgs.ac.uk/discovering-geology/climate-change/what-causes-the-earths-climate-to-change/

Climate change in New Zealand

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_in_New_Zealand#:~:text=The%20combined%20effects%20of%20climate,sea%20levels%20and%20higher%20temperatures.

References

Gapminder. (n.d.). 70% of people get this question wrong. Retrieved September 2, 2021, from https://upgrader.gapminder.org/t/sdg-world-un-goals/58/explanation/

Science Learning Hub. (n.d.). Futures thinking toolkit. Retrieved September 2, 2021, from https://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/resources/2439-futures-thinking-toolkit

The Guardian. (2019, March 7). Big data: why should you care? [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ji18sDbWI_k&t=2s

0 notes

architectnews · 3 years

Text

New UK Housing: British Housebuilding

New British Homes, Property in England, Building, ONS House Price Index 2021, Architect

New UK Housing: Housebuilding News

UK Residential Property Expansion + Housebuilding Issues: Reaction to Budget

3 August 2021

UK commercial premises conversion to residential property

This week the Government’s new rules have come into effect making it easier for commercial premises to be converted into residential property. While this might seem like a welcome change, will we really see the high street and office blocks converted into flats – it surely won’t be that easy, says Savio D’Costa, Commercial Real Estate Partner at JMW Solicitors:

“With demand clearly outstripping supply for housing, it is extremely sensible to make it easier to convert building usage for different purposes. As shops move online and restaurants and bars struggle to turn a profit, converting those properties to homes will help meet the high demand for residential housing. However, it’s not as straightforward as it might first appear. These rules have overlooked certain basic requirements – such as being able to convert external facades.

“In addition, the juxtaposition of commercial premises coexisting with residential housing such as in office blocks also has its drawbacks and could change the business district environment altogether.”

16 June 2021

UK House Price Rise

ONS House Price Index Rise

Today’s ONS House Price Index shows that the average UK house price rose by 8.9% in the year to April 2021.

Jamie Johnson, CEO of FJP Investment, said: “While today’s ONS’s data reaffirms what most of us already knew, which is that house prices have risen significantly throughout the first half of the year, we have to remember that there is a time delay with this index. We are receiving insight into the state of the market in April, not right now. This is important because, as the stamp duty holiday approaches, we are really waiting to see if the house price growth continues, plateaus or falls across June, July and into summer.

“The rate of growth has slowed slightly according to ONS, and I expect this trend to continue once the initial stamp duty holiday deadline passes on 30 June. However, given the scheme tapers down rather than coming to an immediate end, this should help avoid any shocks in the property market. Ultimately, demand will not disappear overnight, and the pandemic has demonstrated once again that both homebuyers and investors see bricks and mortar as a safe bet during times of economic uncertainty.”

Paresh Raja, CEO of Market Financial Solutions said: “We are in the eye of a perfect storm, with multiple factors contributing to house prices increasing at a remarkable rate. The role of the stamp duty holiday is well documented. But we must also acknowledge that the pandemic has forced homeowners to reconsider their priorities, prompting many to list their properties and look for new homes. At the same time, the Bank of England’s record low base rate makes borrowing more affordable, while we are also seeing more investors gravitating towards real estate as a reliable asset class in the current climate.

“Given these multiple factors, not to mention the backlog of deals still waiting to be completed, there is every reason to believe prices will continue to increase in the second half of 2021, even if the rate of growth eases off, as was seemingly the case in April when compared to March. The stamp duty holiday might be about to begin its taper back to normal levels, but it would be foolish to assume this will reverse the past year’s progress.”

30 Sep 2020

Impact Of Covid-19 on UK Housebuilding

New Figures Show Impact Of Covid-19 On Housebuilding Rates

Quarterly housing starts and completions lowest since 2000

Industry calls for assistance to construction sector

Wednesday 30 September 2020 – The number of new build homes started or completed in England between April and June 2020 fell to their lowest levels since the year 2000as Covid-19 hit the construction industry, according to new figures published today.

The figures also show, despite Covid, a longer-term decline in housing starts and completions, with the number of homes started or completed in the year to June 2020 also showing a sharp fall.

According to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, the indicators of new housing supply figures should be regarded as a leading indicator of overall supply.

They show:

The number of dwellings where building work has started on site was 15,930 in April to June 2020 – a 52% decrease when compared to the last quarter. It also follows a recent trend of a slowdown in growth with six of the last six quarters showing a decrease. Starts are 67% below their March quarter 2007 peak and are 7% below the previous trough in the March quarter of 2009. It is the lowest quarterly starts figure in the seasonally adjusted time series (which begins in the year 2000).

There were 121,630 estimated new build dwellings starts in the year to June 2020, a 26 per cent decrease compared to the year to June 2019.

The number of dwellings completed on site was 15,390 in April to June 2020. This is a 62% decrease compared to the last quarter and 64% below their level in the same quarter a year ago. Completions are now 67% below their peak in the March quarter 2007 and 37% below the previous trough in March quarter 2013. It is the lowest quarterly completions figure in the seasonally adjusted time series (which begins in the year 2000).

An estimated 147,180 new build dwellings were completed in the year to June 2020, a decrease of 15 per cent compared to the year to June 2019.

Clive Docwra, managing director of property and construction consultancy McBains said:

“Today’s statistics bear out the huge impact that Covid-19 – and in particular the Spring lockdown – has had on housebuilding rates.

“The government target of building a million new homes in the new five years was always going to be a steep challenge, but the pandemic has dealt a heavy blow to that ambition.

“The industry is now facing a double-whammy – trying to recover from the impact of Covid but also suffering from the uncertainty over a Brexit deal – with investors holding off putting money into new developments until the picture on a withdrawal agreement becomes clearer.

“The Government will no doubt point to its recent planning White Paper as the answer to building more homes, saying that it will mean ‘permission in principle’ will be given to developments on land designated for renewal to speed-up building, but the uncertainty and resulting fluctuating values driven by Covid and Brexit are reducing the incentive on developers to build in the short term.

“The government could address this by temporarily staggering or deferring Section 106 planning obligations – where developers are asked to provide contributions for community infrastructure – so that developers are encouraged to complete housebuilding projects as soon as possible.”

Recent UK housing news on e-architect:

New UK homes for the North and Midlands

13 August 2020

UK Residential Market News

Rental Sector Strength Comment

We post comment below in response to the RICS monthly residential market survey.

Elisabeth Kohlbach, CEO of Skwire comments: “Doom and gloom surrounding the news that the UK residential market is set for a ‘bust’ in the coming months overlooks a bright spot in a major segment of the residential market – the rental sector.

“The PRS sector is a growing part of the UK’s housing mix and the demand for this part of the market is not going away. Moreover, with lenders introducing a range of restrictions to cope with the spike in demand for mortgages following the announcement of stamp duty relief, many would-be buyers are struggling to get on the ladder and will no doubt turn to the rental market once again.

“While traditional destinations for BTR investors, such as London, may no longer be as attractive as remote workers flock to towns and cities beyond the capital, investors should look to the regions, which offer an exciting and untapped opportunity. Institutional investors should look beyond the traditional high density city-centre developments and seize the opportunity to tap into a rich pool of existing stock across the UK.”

7 August 2020

UK house prices rise in July

Halifax House Price Index for July 2020

Halifax has this morning released its House Price Index for July, showing that house prices have risen month-on-month and year-on-year in reaction to the Stamp Duty Land Tax holiday introduced earlier in the month.

While this is positive news for the sector, can this momentum be maintained?

Jamie Johnson, CEO of FJP Investment “Today’s House Price Index shows that the stamp duty holiday is having its desired effect, encouraging buyers and sellers to make a cautious return back to the property market. The release of pent-up demand is driving up house prices, slowly making up for the losses that were incurred at the height of the pandemic.

“The big question now is whether this initial burst in activity can be maintained over the next few months. Will house prices continue to grow; or will the momentum fizzle out? There is no clear answer at present. Nonetheless, today’s House Price Index makes the case for cautious optimism.

“Importantly, I do not believe the coronavirus has dampened investor demand for UK real estate. Property’s resilience and ability to quickly recover any losses in value in times of crises makes it a top asset class for both domestic and overseas buyers. Once there is greater certainty about the future of COVID-19 and the post-pandemic recovery, I anticipate buyer demand to return in full force.”

8 July 2020

UK Stamp Duty Changes

8 July 2020 Chancellor’s ‘mini budget’ for green jobs misses mark on transport and housing, says to CPRE

Commenting on the Chancellors ‘mini budget’, Tom Fyans, campaigns and policy director at CPRE, the countryside charity, said:

‘While we have seen promising starts on energy efficiency and shoring up rural hospitality businesses, the Chancellor has missed major opportunities to begin building back better when it comes to transport and housing investment.’

Read more at UK Summer Statement Response

8 July 2020 RIBA reacts to Chancellor’s ‘Plan for Jobs’

“The RIBA has long advocated for a ‘green’ post-COVID recovery, so I welcome the Chancellor’s efforts to put sustainability front and centre of today’s announcements.”

Read more at RIBA UK News

8 July 2020 UK Stamp Duty Changes

View from Metropolitan Thames Valley Housing on the stamp duty changes:

Kush Rawal, Director of Residential Investment from Metropolitan Thames Valley Housing comments: “We welcome the Chancellor’s stamp duty holiday, which makes shared ownership homes an even more attractive option for people looking to own their own home. Removing stamp duty from almost all initial share purchases means that key workers will be able to buy a shared ownership home with as little as two months of rent as their deposit.”

6 July 2020

Is ‘build build build’ best for England’s planning system?

Alister Scott, Professor of Environmental Geography and an expert in urban planning and infrastructure, writes for The Conversation on proposals to change the UK’s planning system.

English Planning System

18 Jun 2020

Timber Frame: Accommodating The Differential

With sales of timber homes and buildings heading towards £1bn in the next 12 months*, Andy Swift, sales and operations manager, UK & ROI for ISO-Chemie, considers sealant tapes for timber frame structures and accommodating differential movement:

New UK Timber Frame Building

3 Jun 2020

UK Architects welcome landmark ARCO Report

We post comments from Mark Rowe, principal at Penoyre & Prasad and Félicie Krikler, director at Assael Architecture in support of ARCO’s landmark report launched earlier today:

Mark Rowe, principal at Penoyre & Prasad, said: “This research highlights the shift towards a more collective way of living – integrating purpose-built accommodation with access to healthcare and facilities that can help maintain independence.” – read more at:

Too little, Too late? Housing for an ageing population

26 Mar 2020

Housebuilding Rates Fall – Even Before Coronavirus Impacts

Thursday 26th of March 2020 – The number of new build homes started and completed in the last quarter of 2019 fell below government targets, according to new government figures published today – and the industry says the coronavirus pandemic is set to impact these further.

According to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, the new build dwellings figures should be regarded as a leading indicator of overall housing supply.

Today’s figures show that:

On a quarterly basis, new build dwelling starts in England were estimated at 34,260 (seasonally adjusted) in the latest quarter, an 11 per cent decrease compared to the previous 3 months and a 17 per cent decrease on a year earlier. Completions were estimated at 44,980 (seasonally adjusted), a 1 per cent decrease from the previous quarter and 3 per cent higher than a year ago.

Annual new build dwelling starts totalled 151,020 in the year to December 2019, a 10 per cent decrease compared with the year to December 2018. During the same period, completions totalled 178,800, an increase of 9 per cent compared with last year

All starts between October and December 2019 are now 99 per cent above the trough in the March quarter 2009 and 30 per cent below the March quarter 2007 peak. All completions between October and December 2019 are 78 per cent above the trough in the March quarter 2013 and 7 per cent below the March quarter 2007 peak.

Clive Docwra, Managing Director of leading construction consulting and design agency McBains, said:

“The government’s ambitious housebuilding target – delivering a million homes in the next five years – was always going to be extremely challenging, and the latest statistics bear this out. However, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic will mean this is now virtually impossible.

“Many sites are empty, supply chains have been disrupted and multi-million pounds worth of private investment is on hold for the foreseeable future. That will knock back housebuilding rates months, if not years.

“The government has already announced an unprecedented package of measures to help support business, but once we’ve turned the tide on the virus further help, such as tax incentives, will be needed to get the UK building again.”

Previously on e-architect:

24 Nov 2017

UK Housebuilding Policy

UK Government Approach to Housing Shortage – Budget Reaction

The UK Chancellor announced a raft of measures aimed at significantly increasing levels of home building and “reviving the British dream of home ownership”.

Key amongst the Chancellor’s statements were the abolition of Stamp Duty Land Tax on homes under £300k for First Time Buyers, £15.3 billion of new financial support for house building over the next five years (which includes money for the government to buy land as well as delivering supporting infrastructure) and more money to help SME builders.

This is in addition to the £10bn extra funding already announced for the English version of the Help to Buy shared equity scheme.

Some reactions to this week’s UK Budget from key built environment representatives:

“In essence the abolition of Stamp duty is the kind of sweeping move we needed to provide hope at the bottom end of the market and hopefully helping towards the aspirational 300K homes per year. As an employer, seeing younger architects get a foothold on the housing ladder is a strong hope and this is surely a welcome hand-out to bring the youth vote around for the Conservatives.

We would like to see more certainty on how the £44Bn figure to aid housebuilding will actually materialise into capital expenditure from Central or Local Government. The budget won’t solve the disconnect in planning, unless some of that cash is pumped into increasing resources in planning departments.”

Graham Hickson-Smith, Commercial Director, 3DReid

“It’s good to see the government taking the housing crisis seriously with the final quarter of the speech devoted to this one subject, an impressive commitment to extra spending of £44bn over five years and the headline grabbing finale of the reduction in stamp duty. The devil though will, as always be in the detail.

The lifting of HRA caps is good in principle but there are no details at all, while the £34m for skills training sounds like a drop in the ocean when we are faced with a huge likely loss of construction workers post-Brexit. Other measures announced include the review to be chaired by Oliver Letwin which may, helpfully, lay to rest the myth that land banking is a serious problem – most developers being concerned to turn over their capital as fast as possible rather than tie it up in dormant sites.

Finally there is the reduction in stamp duty for first time buyers, which will undoubtedly appeal to younger voters, but the same measure would probably be much more effective, economically, as an incentive to retired people to downsize, releasing under-occupied houses into the market.”

Richard Morton, Richard Morton Architects

“We really welcome the Chancellor’s moves to boost the supply of badly-needed new homes. Policies which aim to lower the cost of land and bring forward more building sites, particularly in urban areas well served by public transport, are good news – and preferable to policies which make it easier for some people to afford high house prices.

But all of this new housing needs to be sustainable, in environmental terms, and here the government’s policies are seriously lacking. It wants five new garden cities, but has said virtually nothing about what defines them.

The Budget has not addressed the critical need for green and low-carbon infrastructure and low-impact homes, not just on green fields, but everywhere. Nor has this budget addressed the need to upgrade and retrofit millions of our existing energy-inefficient homes.”

Sue Riddlestone OBE, Chief Executive of Bioregional

22 Jan 2016

UK Housing Expansion

Homebuilding in Great Britain

The Ministry of Defence has put 12 sites on the block to provide land for up to 15,000 new homes.

Government Defence Minister Mark Lancaster said the land sale was expected to raise £500m, which will be ploughed back into frontline defence budgets, reports https://ift.tt/3gu2l4R.

The sale is the first tranche of more ambitious plans to support the government’s ambition to build 160,000 homes by 2020.

The MOD, which owns around 1% of all UK land, plans to slash the size of its built estate by nearly a third, with its current holdings stretching to 452,000 hectares.

As part of that plan, the Ministry has committed to generating £1bn through land sales during this parliament and contributing up to 55,000 homes.

Imber in Wiltshire, on Salisbury Plain, England “was evacuated in 1943. The village, still classed as a civil parish, remains under control of the Ministry of Defence”: photograph © swns.com

Ministry of Defence Estate Sell-off MoD estate sell-off – tranche 1 12 sites placed on the market:

– Kneller Hall in Twickenham – Claro and Deverell barracks in Ripon – RAF sites Molesworth and Alconbury in Cambridgeshire, and Mildenhall in Suffolk. – Lodge Hill in Kent – Craigiehall in Edinburgh – HMS Nelson Wardroom in Portsmouth – Hullavington Airfield in Wiltshire – RAF Barnham in Suffolk – MOD Feltham in London

The MOD will announce further sites in due course, with a full list published in the Footprint Strategy later in 2016.

Link: https://ift.tt/3gs27v2

photograph © swns.com

British Houses

UK Government Housing Policy

UK Government Design Advisory Panel – New Housing Design Quality

Chair of RIBA Housing Group, Andy Von Bradsky, represented RIBA this week on the government’s Design Advisory Panel. The panel was set up under the coalition government and has been re-formed by the current government to advise on key policy issues, reports the RIBA.

The RIBA has welcomed the Prime Minister’s announcement that a Design Advisory Panel is being set up to ‘set the bar on housing design across the country’ and is looking forward to working with other panel members.

David Cameron announced the creation of the panel this week when he confirmed the go ahead for a new Starter Homes scheme, though the panel will inform government policies on housing design nationally.

Fleet Street Hill Housing in London by Peter Barber Architects: image from architect

The DCLG has already confirmed that panel members will include Sir Terry Farrell, classicist Sir Quinlan Terry and philosopher Roger Scruton alongside nominated representatives from the RIBA, RTPI, Design Council and Create Streets.

The panel will be chaired by ministers, so there are high hopes that it will have a genuine influence on policy. The Government says the panel will act as a sounding board, so that the housing and design industry can discuss policy issues with ministers and senior government officials. Its remit will cover:

Emerging housing and planning policy to ensure that good design is considered and embedded from the outset. Delivery of housing and planning policy to ensure that good design is achieved through Government’s programmes. Emerging industry issues and barriers to good design in housing delivery.

Inspiring design of Grand Large Housing Dunkirk: photo from ANMA/Agence Nicolas Michelin & Associés

‘We welcome the response from Government to the Farrell review and our own recommendation to have more design advice available to Government when shaping policy.’ said RIBA Head of External Affairs Anna Scott-Marshall.

‘It is encouraging that the Government, industry and other professionals will work in collaboration to ensure that we build the right kinds of homes in the right kinds of places.’ Farrell is also enthusiastic and said the panel has the potential to make a real difference.

‘It builds on the recommendations of the Farrell Review (https://ift.tt/3xpf4LF), which highlighted the need for more proactive planning and better placemaking as we attempt to address the housing crisis, with radically higher priority given to landscape, sustainability and the public realm.’

Stadthaus at 24 Murray Grove, London, by Waugh Thistleton – constructed entirely in timber, the nine-storey high-rise is the tallest timber residential building in the world

Stadthaus photo : Will Pryce Murray Grove Housing

Interesting link:

Imber village on Salisbury Plain under control of the Ministry of Defence

UK Housing Links:

Housing Crisis

New London Housing

British Homes

British House Designs

English Architecture:

English Architecture Designs – chronological list

Location: UK

Contemporary British Homes

Recent British Home Designs

Black House, Kent, South East England Architect: AR Design Studio image courtesy of architects Black House in Kent

A House for Essex, Essex, South East England Design: FAT Architecture and Grayson Perry photograph : Jack Hobhouse A House for Essex

Balancing Barn, Suffolk, South East England Design: MVRDV photo : Living Architecture Balancing Barn Suffolk

Hurst House, Buckinghamshire, Southern England Design: John Pardey Architects with Ström Architects photo : Andy Matthews Buckinghamshire Property

Contemporary North European Homes

Recent North European Houses

Danish Houses

German Houses

French Houses

Comments / photos for the New UK Housing Shortage – Current British Housebuilding page welcome

The post New UK Housing: British Housebuilding appeared first on e-architect.

#e-architect

0 notes

xtruss · 4 years

Text

Campaign Chronicles

What Happens if Donald Trump Fights the Election Results?

Stealing a Presidential election in America is difficult, but it has been done before.

— By Eric Lach | August 21, 2020 | The New Yorker

Donald Trump has disputed the popular-vote results of a Presidential contest he won. Now he leads a concerted effort to undermine public confidence in the upcoming election.Photograph by Saul Loeb / Getty

On the night of November 7, 1876, as the results of the Presidential election between Samuel Tilden, the Democratic governor of New York, and Rutherford B. Hayes, the Republican governor of Ohio, began to come in, America, in its centennial year, was barely holding together. Reconstruction was faltering. The economic collapse that followed the Panic of 1873 had left millions out of work, and provoked strikes and labor unrest across the nation. The outgoing Republican Administration of Ulysses S. Grant had been embroiled in a series of corruption scandals. A few months earlier, Sioux warriors had defeated General George Custer and his troops at Little Bighorn. Hayes, whom Henry Adams described as a “third-rate nonentity,” had earned the Republican nomination, in large part, by being the one candidate all factions of the Party could agree on. Tilden and the Democrats seemed poised for an easy victory. As the historian Eric Foner writes in “Reconstruction,” his history of the period, “political corruption and the depression became Tilden’s watchwords; issues many Republicans feared would suffice to carry the election.”

Before Election Day was over, it was clear that Tilden, who, in his previous career as a Gilded Age corporate lawyer and reorganizer of bankrupt railroad lines, had earned the nickname the Great Forecloser, would comfortably win the popular vote. He needed only a single vote in the Electoral College to put him over the top, and results were outstanding in Florida, South Carolina, and Louisiana, where white citizens routinely used violence, intimidation, and fraud to keep their Black neighbors, most of whom were loyal to the Republican Party of Abraham Lincoln, from voting. With the prospect of Democrats taking the White House through disenfranchisement at hand, Republicans moved to steal the election outright. “With your state sure for Hayes, he is elected,” Party leaders said in an Election Night telegram to their cronies in the three Southern states. “Hold your state.”

In Florida, the two Republicans on the three-person election board—Samuel McLin, the Florida secretary of state, and Clayton Cowgill, the state comptroller—systematically approved and rejected results, district by district, to swing the election in their party’s favor. “If the canvassing board had simply accepted all the local returns, Tilden would have prevailed by 94 votes,” Edward Foley, an election-law professor at Ohio State University, writes in “Ballot Battles,” a survey of disputed American elections. “In its decisive 2–1 rulings, however, the board selectively invalidated Tilden-favoring returns because of technicalities, while refusing to invalidate Hayes-favoring returns despite clear evidence of actual fraud.” In this way, a narrow Tilden lead was transformed into a narrow Hayes lead. Similar events unfolded in South Carolina and Louisiana. “The result was manufactured by a deliberate manipulation of the count,” Foley writes.

Democrats were outraged. What ensued is a mostly forgotten episode of American misgovernment that has lately been haunting Foley and other academics, as well as a loose network of bipartisan ex-officials, activists, and think-tank types, who are now contemplating the potential for a disputed election in the present day, at our own fraught political moment. The three Southern states in 1876 each sent Congress two pieces of paper, one from Republican electors certifying that Hayes had won the election, the other from Democratic electors certifying that Tilden had. The crisis these pieces of paper provoked, as Congress tried to reconcile their competing claims, pushed America’s constitutional order to its breaking point—or perhaps, looked at from another angle, it was a reflection of an order that had already broken down.

The Twelfth Amendment, which lays out the procedure for electing the President and Vice-President, says nothing about what Congress should do in the event that states send competing election certificates. Republicans controlled the Senate, and Democrats controlled the House. The two chambers established a commission to try to break the impasse. The dispute went on for months. (Back then, Administrations were inaugurated in March.) With Inauguration just days away and the prospect looming of a country with two people claiming the Presidency and no actual President, House Speaker Samuel Randall presided over a debate described decades later in a history of the crisis as “probably the stormiest ever witnessed in any House of Representatives.” Congressmen reached for their revolvers, and women in the gallery, “fearing a free fight,” ducked out of the chamber.

The tension broke only after William Levy, a Democratic representative from Louisiana who had been in on negotiations between the Southern states and Hayes’s camp, finally signalled that a deal had been struck. Tilden and the Democrats would concede the White House to Republicans, allowing Hayes to effectively steal back the election. Rising to speak in the House chamber, Levy called upon his fellow-Democrats “to join me in the course which I feel called upon and justified in pursuing.” The price that Democrats exacted from Republicans, though, was incalculably high: the drawdown of federal troops in the Southern states, the end of Reconstruction, and the consignment of Black citizens to a century of violent repression. “The negro will disappear from the field of national politics,” The Nation wrote at the time. “Henceforth, the nation, as a nation, will have nothing more to do with him.”

The Hayes-Tilden crisis was resolved, Foley told me recently, “at the expense of America’s commitment to its own citizens.” Unlike the 2000 election, between George Bush and Al Gore, where the dispute was contained in the courts, the 1876 dispute spilled out into the broader political system, and its outcome was openly determined by a naked struggle for power between the two ruling parties. “Because many of us have a living memory of 2000, we think that any election dispute is going to look like 2000,” he said. “Where, in fact, I think that kind of gives us a false sense of what might happen. I think there are now conditions in place that may cause this year’s election to be more like 1876.”

It has been difficult, throughout Donald Trump’s Presidency, to immediately know which of his declarations represent constitutional danger and which are merely attention-seeking bluster. “I think mail-in voting is going to rig the election,” Trump told Fox News’s Chris Wallace during a recent White House interview. When Wallace asked if the President was suggesting that he might not accept the results, Trump, with hands raised, replied, “I have to see. I’m not going to just say yes.” The President’s intermittent musings about postponing the November election have so reliably set off rounds of breathless news coverage that Marc Elias, one of the Democratic Party’s go-to election lawyers, was compelled to write a blog post in March titled “No, Trump Cannot Move the General Election.” Similarly, in response to the persistent speculation that an electorally defeated Trump would spend Joe Biden’s Inauguration Day holed up in the Lincoln Bedroom like Tony Montana at the end of “Scarface,” the Biden campaign in July issued a pithy statement saying, “the United States government is perfectly capable of escorting trespassers out of the White House.”

But Trump’s threats about rejecting the results come November are not idle. In 2016, Trump disputed the results of an election he won, ludicrously claiming that his popular-vote shortfall was the result of illegitimate ballots cast by millions of undocumented immigrants. Four years later, the President is at the head of a concerted effort to undermine public confidence in the upcoming election. Trump has denounced efforts to expand the mail-voting systems that will allow millions of people to cast their ballots safely in this pandemic year. He has ignored calls to provide election administrators with much-needed additional funding to safeguard voters, staff, volunteers, and the vote-counting process. And he has overseen the crippling of the U.S. Postal Service at a time when its work will be critical to the success of the election. “It’s just a question of overload,” Richard L. Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine, and the author of “Election Meltdown: Dirty Tricks, Distrust, and the Threat to American Democracy,” said. “We have problems with voting machines; we have problems with incompetent election officials. There is foreign interference. Layer on top of that the covid-19 crisis. Layer on top of that a President who is a norm breaker.”

In June, the Transition Integrity Project, a newly formed group devoted to evaluating how a disputed election might unfold, hosted a series of “war games” to play out various scenarios for what might happen on and after November 3rd. Zoe Hudson, a former Open Society Foundation analyst who serves as the director of the project, told me that the idea was to “socialize” potential risks. “Surprise doesn’t work for us,” she said. “We really need people to understand that this will be an unusual election year.”

More than a hundred people participated, most of them prominent names in academia, politics, and the media—Foley was there, as were the former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, former Michigan governor Jennifer Granholm, and former Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele. Participants assumed roles as members of the Trump or Biden campaigns, state officials, and the media. The games, which were played under the Chatham House rule—participants are allowed to discuss what happened as long as they don’t reveal who in the room said or did what—proceeded by turns, with certain developments determined by dice rolls. “One of the big takeaways on all sides is that what you have here potentially is a situation where neither side accepts a loss,” Adam Jentleson, a former aide to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid who participated in the war games, told me. “And that’s a very difficult circle to square.”

While Americans have grown accustomed to Election Nights that unfold like Super Bowls—tune in at 5 p.m. for the pregame and turn off the set at midnight after one side or the other hoists the trophy—the surge in absentee voting brought on by the coronavirus pandemic will likely frustrate that expectation this year. Counting absentee ballots is a slow, laborious process, and, in a number of states, the counting cannot begin until the election is over. In primary elections this spring and summer, states without past experience counting large numbers of absentee ballots have struggled to process them. In New York, the state Board of Elections took six weeks to declare Representative Carolyn Maloney the winner of the congressional Democratic primary in the state’s Twelfth District. Her challenger in the race, Suraj Patel, filed a lawsuit, citing a number of issues with the count, including thousands of mail-in ballots being disqualified and tens of thousands being sent out too late for voters to realistically return on time. Maloney suggested that Patel was playing into Trump’s hands by questioning the legitimacy of an election. Patel and his campaign understandably bristled at the charge. Count every vote, they have insisted. Address the problems now so that they don’t plague us in November.

It’s one thing for an election dispute to play out in a little-noticed congressional primary. When similar disputes broke out in the Transition Integrity Project’s games, with the future of the entire country on the line, the effect was pure mayhem. In the first scenario, the results from three states—North Carolina, Michigan, and Florida—remained too close to call for more than a week. On Election Night, Trump’s campaign called on Biden to concede, citing in-person-voting returns, which looked good for the President. But as the absentee ballots in these states were counted, the numbers swung toward Biden. This was “blue shift,” a phenomenon observed by Foley and other academics in recent elections, wherein in-person-vote totals have tended to skew Republican, while absentee voting has skewed Democratic. Blue shift is what kept the Democratic House wave in 2018 from being immediately apparent on Election Night—the mail votes cast in California that fall took weeks to count, an outcome that former House Speaker Paul Ryan, a Republican, described at the time as “bizarre.” This year, with Trump explicitly making mail voting a partisan issue, the blue shift is likely to be especially pronounced. And Trump is, in turn, expected to denounce this easily explainable phenomenon as nefarious.

As the votes were being tallied in the game, Trump pounced. The team playing as his campaign called on the Justice Department to use federal agents to “secure” voting sites and tried to enlist state Republican officials to stop the further counting of absentee ballots. The Biden team, in response, called for every vote to be counted and urged its supporters to attend rallies calling for the same. During subsequent turns, Trump tried to federalize the National Guard, and both parties sought to block or overturn results in key states. Eventually, North Carolina was declared for Biden and Florida was declared for Trump, leaving Michigan as the deciding state—there, a “rogue individual” destroyed ballots believed to be favorable to Biden, leaving Trump with a narrow lead. Michigan’s Republican-led legislature certified Trump’s victory, but the state’s Democratic governor, Gretchen Whitmer, refused to accept the result, citing the sabotage, and sent a separate certification to Congress.

It was 1876 all over again. Both campaigns called for their supporters to take to the streets. Trump invoked the Insurrection Act. Republicans in Congress declared that Vice-President Mike Pence, as president of the Senate, was entitled to choose which certification from Michigan to accept as legitimate. Democrats, of course, rejected that argument. “There was no clear resolution of the conflict in the January 6 joint session of Congress,” the game summary reads. “The partisans on both sides were still claiming victory, leading to the problem of two claims to Commander-in-Chief power (including access to the nuclear codes) at noon on January 20.” The game ended there.

Another scenario, in which Trump won a clear victory in the Electoral College but lost the national popular vote by an even wider margin than in 2016, also ended in chaos. Biden withdrew his Election Night concession and asked the Democratic governors in Wisconsin, Michigan, and North Carolina for recounts. The governors in Wisconsin and Michigan took the 1876 course again, sending a slate of electors to Congress that conflicted with those sent by their states’ Republican-controlled legislatures. Republicans, unsuccessfully, tried to cajole moderate Democrats to break from their party and back Trump’s victory. “At the end of the first turn,” the summary reads, “the country was in the midst of a full-blown constitutional crisis.” Congress, once again, failed to resolve the standoff before Inauguration Day. “It was unclear what the military would do in this situation,” the transcript says. According to the Times, near the end of this scenario, Podesta, the former Clinton campaign chairman, called on California, Oregon, and Washington to secede from the Union.

Even a scenario that led to a peaceful transfer of power was, at certain moments, politically perilous. In one game, Biden won the election by a narrow but clear margin. Trump’s campaign persuaded the Republican-controlled legislatures in Michigan and Pennsylvania to send Congress conflicting election certifications. Attorney General William Barr announced that the Justice Department would begin investigating “voter fraud” and took steps to stop ballot counting. But, as the game went on, Senator Mitt Romney convinced three of his fellow Republican senators to break ranks and support Biden. A dice roll determined that four million people would participate in pro-Biden street demonstrations. The Joint Chiefs of Staff discussed resigning in protest at Trump’s increasingly desperate behavior, and those discussions were leaked to the press. As power began to slip away from the President, right-wing media turned increasingly toxic, and his Administration devolved into a frenzy of document destruction and corrupt pardonings. Biden called on the House and Senate Intelligence Committees to investigate foreign interference in the election and announced that moderate Republicans, including the governor of Massachusetts, Charlie Baker, would serve in his Cabinet. The game ended with the Democratic Party beginning to investigate Trump and his family.

These war games were hypothetical imaginings of extraordinary circumstances. But an election in a pandemic year with a President declaring in advance that the vote will be rigged are extraordinary circumstances. “One big takeaway is that leaders really need to know what exactly their powers are, and what the powers of others are, and think through some of these options in advance,” Rosa Brooks, a law professor at Georgetown University who helped convene the Transition Integrity Project, told me recently. “Because if things go bad, they’ll go bad very quickly, and people will have to make decisions in an hour, not in a week.”

The contours of the upcoming election are already being fought over in the courts. Since the 2000 election, with its hanging chads and butterfly ballots, America has seen an explosion of election-related litigation, from an average of ninety-four lawsuits a year to an average of two hundred and seventy a year, according to an analysis by Hasen, the author of “Election Meltdown.” This year, there have already been some two hundred election lawsuits filed over covid-19-related issues alone. In May, the Trump campaign and the Republican National Committee doubled their legal budget, to twenty million dollars. “Bush v. Gore exposed shortcomings in our system in a very visible way,” Rebecca Green, an election-law professor at William & Mary Law School, said. “And so people started pushing back and testing it.” This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, Green said. “We do disputed elections in this country. We have processes in place. We have law. It’s not the Wild West where we’re left without direction on how this should unfold.” She added, “I really worry about public confidence being undermined by this constant drumbeat of meltdown.”

The biggest cases so far have centered on mail voting. At the state level, efforts to address this year’s unprecedented voting challenges have largely been bipartisan efforts—as many as forty-five states will allow voters to mail in their ballots for the November election. But in the courts, the two parties’ overarching national positions come down to this: Democrats are trying to make voting by mail as easy as possible, and Republicans are fighting to prevent that. Caught in the middle are election administrators, the local officials tasked with organizing and processing our voting systems. The Brennan Center for Justice at N.Y.U. has estimated that administrators would need an additional four billion dollars in funding to safeguard the vote during the pandemic. In the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, Congress allocated four hundred million dollars for election preparations. The shortfall will likely mean, in many cases, fewer polling places, longer lines, and slower processing of absentee ballots. Administrators have also reported trouble recruiting volunteers—the battalion of retirees that normally mind our polls and count our ballots—because many of them are wary of exposure to the virus. In normal years, election administrators and the volunteers they rely on are prone to mistakes. This year, all these issues make slow counts and frustrated voters even more likely—and create the conditions for one side or the other to dispute the outcome.

Of course, Trump has increased the chances for such a dispute by undermining public trust in the system itself. Nowhere has this dynamic been more insidious than with the Postal Service. Conservatives have been targeting the agency for cuts for years, and recent Trump Administration decisions—spearheaded by the new Postmaster General, Louis DeJoy, who is a major Trump donor—have caused a mail slowdown around the country. Those efforts have collided with an election that will rely on the Postal Service more than any in American history. Trump has made the connection explicit. “They want three and a half billion dollars for something that’ll turn out to be fraudulent,” he said earlier this month, about the Democrats’ position in the latest round of negotiations over pandemic relief. “They need that money in order to make the Post Office work so it can take all of these millions and millions of ballots.” The fear and distrust that Trump has sown has meant that, when the Postal Service recently sent a letter to states warning that some of their absentee-ballot application and filing deadlines were “incongruous with the Postal Service’s delivery standards” and too close to Election Day to guarantee timely delivery—a concern that independent election experts have raised for years—state officials grew worried that the federal government was preëmptively preparing to blame them for problems in November. “I think that many people were surprised by the tone of the letter,” Tammy Patrick, an adviser at the Democracy Fund who previously served as an election administrator in Maricopa County, Arizona, said. “I have never seen the Postal Service throw a customer under the bus before—and certainly not when the votes of American citizens are on the line.” (On Friday, DeJoy is scheduled to appear at hearings before congressional Democrats.)

After Election Day, the lawsuits are expected to shift to questions about ballot counting. Absentee ballots present bureaucratic problems in ways that in-person voting doesn’t. Even in normal election years, a large number of absentee ballots are disqualified. The reasons range from signature matching, a notoriously unreliable process, to disputes over “voter intent,” where individual ballots are evaluated for stray markings, and ballots that arrive after the deadline. “In a lot of cases, the law does give judges leeway,” Green said. “And the unenviable place where they end up is, do I stretch the law to enfranchise as many people as I can, or do I read the law strictly and end up disenfranchising people?” Already this year, the disqualification rate seen in some states during the primaries has been alarming. “The biggest potential disaster is that one candidate wins because so many votes are thrown out,” Hasen told me. “More votes are lost to incompetence than anything else.”

Rachana Desai Martin, who is leading the Biden campaign’s voter-protection efforts, told me that the campaign’s energy was currently focussed on voter education. “We want to make sure that we’re doing everything we can to put out correct information about how to vote, and that means both by mail and also in person, early and on Election Day,” Martin said. (Hasen, for his part, recently made a recommendation on Twitter. “FLATTEN THE ABSENTEE BALLOT CURVE,” he wrote. “If voting by mail request your ballot as soon as you are able and return it as soon as you can.”) Outside progressive groups, though, are preparing for all contingencies. Indivisible, the Trump resistance group founded in the wake of the 2016 election, recently paired up with Stand Up America and other progressive organizations to form Protect the Results, which will strive to get millions of people into the streets in the case of a disputed outcome. “We have to prepare for mobilization immediately,” Ezra Levin, Indivisible’s co-founder, said in a recent interview.

American elections are always messy. The Constitution does not guarantee candidates or voters the right to perfect electoral outcomes. But even a President cannot overturn an election on his own. An 1876-like scenario relies on lawmakers at the state level being willing to potentially buck the will of the voters. In this way, the days after November 3rd may offer an early clue about whether Trumpism will endure in the Republican Party. How far will state lawmakers be willing to go to keep him in office, or to back him up if he declares victory based on the vote totals before the absentees are counted, or disputes the total counts after they are? And if partisans at the state level kick the dispute up to Congress, as happened in 1876, would congressional Republicans, led by Mitch McConnell, follow their lead? “That’s the key question,” William Kristol, the former editor of The Weekly Standard and a prominent Never Trump Republican, said. (Kristol played Trump in two of the Transition Integrity Project’s games.) Even if Trump can’t successfully fight an election outcome, Kristol said, if the Republican Party goes along with his protests, they’d potentially be associating themselves with “a false and dangerous stabbed-in-the-back narrative” that could define the Party for years to come.

There are other nightmare scenarios. Foley, in particular, fears that counting delays will lead to states missing the December deadlines by which elections need to be certified to Congress. There are those who fear that Trump will exploit covid-19 to mandate emergency stay-at-home orders in Democratic-leaning cities in the final days or weeks of the campaign. There are others who point to a recently lapsed judicial-consent decree that, for decades, prevented the Republican Party from sending “poll watchers” out to intimidate voters in nonwhite neighborhoods. (“There is this real concern that officials who have been engaged in voter suppression as an electoral tactic can now weaponize covid to push that further,” Vanita Gupta, the former head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, who participated in the Transition Integrity Project, said. “Frankly, it’s all of a piece.”) And there are fears about the Portland or Lafayette Square-style deployment of federal agents across the country. Lawrence Wilkerson, a retired Army colonel and former chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell, who sat in on two of the Transition Integrity Project’s games, told me that he couldn’t rule out Trump trying to drag the military into a postelection dispute. “That’s what worries me about this,” he said, “that anybody who told Trump that some action they were going to take was conducive to his retention of office would be told immediately, ‘Go do it.’ ”

As he has in other areas of American self-government, Trump has revealed how much of our democracy rests on norms rather than enforceable laws. Ultimately, the one norm that has been crucial to the resolution of past disputes is the one that Trump is perhaps least likely to observe: conceding defeat. In 1876, Tilden, from the start of the crisis, was privately prepared to concede and ultimately did so. And while the Supreme Court is popularly remembered as the decisive actor that handed the 2000 election to George W. Bush, it was Al Gore’s decision to concede, and to not pursue additional legal options, that really ended matters. In November, if Trump loses and refuses to concede, he may live up to one of his favorite boasts. No one will have ever seen anything like it. When I asked the Trump campaign what preparations it was making for the possibility of counts coming in slowly, or being too close to call, on and after Election Day, Tim Murtaugh, Trump’s campaign communications director, told me in an e-mailed statement, “We don’t know what kind of shenanigans Democrats will try leading up to November. If someone had asked George W. Bush and Al Gore this same question in 2000, would they have been able to foresee the drawn out fight over Florida? The central point remains clear: in a free and fair election, President Trump will win.”

0 notes

news-mashable-yahoopartner-blog · 6 years

Text

Online dating isn't a game. It's literally changing humanity.

In our Love App-tually series, Mashable shines a light into the foggy world of online dating. After all, it's still cuffing season.

The swipe is about as casual a gesture as it gets.

On Tinder, Bumble and every copycat dating app, choices are made in the blink of an eye. You're not making definitive decisions about this stream full of faces; it's more a question "could this person be hot if we match, if they have something interesting to say, if they're not a creep and we're a few drinks in?"

You feel so far removed from the process of dating at this stage, let alone a relationship, that swiping is simply a game. (Indeed, the makers of the mobile medieval royalty RPG Reigns intended its simple left-right controls as a Tinder homage.) You're like Matthew Broderick at the start of the 1983 movie War Games — enamored with technology's possibilities, gleefully playing around.

And like Broderick, who discovers that "Global Thermonuclear War" isn't just a fun version of Risk, you couldn't be more wrong. With each choice, you are helping to set uncontrollable forces in motion. When you swipe, the future of the human race is quite literally at your fingertips.

Luckily, you may be accidentally saving it rather than accidentally destroying it. Mostly.

youtube

For millennia, humans were most likely to marry and/or raise kids with (which, then as now, wasn't always the same thing) members of their own tribe. That changed a little when we started to sail and settle around the world, but ideas about religion and race and class still governed our dating decisions — in the rare cases when those decisions were fully ours to make.

In pre-World War II America, we were most likely to meet our significant others through family. In the 1950s came the rise of meeting "friends of friends," and that method stayed dominant through the rest of the century.

Even as we declared in the 1960s and 1970s that love was all that mattered, meet-cute was mostly for the movies. Nearly half of all marriages were drawn from the same old pre-vetted, limited pool, blind-date setups.

SEE ALSO: Here are the best gay dating apps, since meeting people IRL is hell

Online dating started to make a dent in the question of how we find our partners as soon as the internet arrived in the 1990s; it wasn't not just porn we're looking for. By 2000, according to surveys, 10 percent of opposite-sex couples and 20 percent of same-sex couples met via the internet, overtaking family introductions.

By 2010 — two years before the launch of Tinder — those numbers had reached around 20 percent and 70 percent respectively. "Friends of friends" setups had dropped by 20 percent in both cases, so that limited-pool and online-pool setups were about equal.

Surprise, surprise: the Tinder era has supercharged this trend. A fresh-as-of-January Stanford study looked at data in relationship surveys that goes up to 2017, and found that 29 percent of heterosexual and 65 percent of gay couples had now met online.

In 2014, Tinder was processing a billion swipes a day; that is now closer to 2 billion. Tinder says that 36 percent of all people on Facebook have created an account; that would translate to 800 million people. More total Tinder matches have been made than there are people on the planet, by a factor of 3.

It's such an addiction that Bumble's in-house sociologist, who formerly worked for Tinder, has to advise us to do no more than half an hour of swiping a day for maximum results. The rest of the world is just as addicted. The 370 million users of Badoo, the most used dating app internationally, are on the app for 90 minutes a day on average.

Smug internet marrieds

And it's not like we're just spending this time mindlessly matching and never meeting. There are an estimated one million Tinder dates every week around the world. Nor are we just dating and never getting serious; given prior trend lines, a 2015 study found that the wide adoption of internet dating had probably increased the total number of marriages by 33 percent compared to a hypothetical internet-free world.

As counterintuitive as it sounds, Tinder may well have helped save marriage as an institution, simply by bringing us more of them. Not to mention faster. Again contrary to conventional wisdom, researchers say online meeting-based marriages happen more quickly after the first date. The jury is still out on whether online-based marriages are more or less likely to end in divorce; there are studies that point in both directions. Call it a wash.

Either way, this is our new romantic landscape. At least one third of all marriages in the U.S. are now between partners who met online. That's more than 600,000 couples every year who would, in any other era, have remained total strangers.

The influence of these internet-minted couples on the dating world isn't over when they marry; it is just getting started. Internet marrieds get to play yentas. They can set up friends on dates with each other — still a thing, even in this day and age.

Who knows how far out the ripple effects go, how many people who would never dream of being on Tinder and Bumble have the course of their lives changed by swipes and matches regardless.

If you've ever noticed on your commute that a bunch of other drivers are taking the same odd Google Maps or Waze-led routes as you, creating entirely new traffic patterns, you get what we're talking about: sudden chaotic unplanned real-world results based on vast digital adoption. Listen closely to your dating app, and you might just hear the roar of a vast human tide of unbridled connection and love, a great wave that is already changing the world, and shows no sign of slowing.

Race and class

First off, there's clear evidence that online dating is creating mixed-race couples at a faster rate than our increasingly diverse society would. This topic is low-hanging fruit, research-wise, because there's a lot of data already associated with it.

Since it was officially OKed in all states by the Supreme Court in 1967, we've seen a slow but steady rise in the percentage of all new U.S. marriages that are interracial — from 3 percent to about 9 percent in 1995. Progress was slow, but it was progress.

However, separate studies in 2017 and 2018 both concluded that online dating since '95 turned that straight line of growth into a curving one. The stats are worth quoting at length (emphasis mine). The first study:

The second study adds that you're more likely to date someone from a different race if you're dating online, by a factor of about 7 percent. That doesn't seem a huge difference, but it adds up over time as online dating becomes exponentially more popular.

Bottom line: Millennials and Generation Z are doing more for society-wide racial integration than many leaders of the Civil Rights struggle in the 1960s — and even the 1990s — ever dreamed possible.

But online dating isn't all good news for those of us who want a fair and just society. Because of course, race isn't the only dividing line that developed countries like America struggle with today. There's also class.

Here the data gets impossibly murky, because people don't exactly divulge their financial status in the Vows section. But there's another proxy for class, and that's the troubling trend towards exclusive, private membership-based dating apps.

There's the League, which has 300,000 members and a 500,000-strong waitlist. There's Luxy, which boasts that half its members are worth half a million or more. But the poster child for this brave new balkanized world is Raya, the LA-based online dating service that only accepts 8 percent of applicants and is currently 10,000 strong across a dozen countries.

Some of the more desperate have been known to offer as much as $10,000 for a membership, according to this New York Times profile. No dice: to get one you're judged on factors like your Instagram following and how many people you know who are already in the club.

On Raya, the well-heeled and well-connected swipe without having to see a single face from the hoi polloi. The founder had utopian visions of a global dinner party, a "digital Davos" for dating. But as with many utopian visions of the past, this has its own unintended consequences.

If Raya is the kind of thing we all secretly aspire to be on, then the future may be one of multiple tiers. Dating apps would become the new rungs of the social ladder. And all the gains made on the interracial front would be lost as people only meet others at their same income or Instagram-follower level.

That effect could last for longer than one generation, if history is any guide. If you and your partner met on Raya, you may look askance at your kids if they want to hang out on tattered old Tinder. We're talking about dating apps creating a new aristocracy.

Which in turn means that we might want to look at apps like Tinder, Bumble, and Badoo in a new light.

By using these widest possible pools of potential dates, rather than aspiring to something more exclusive, we're keeping ourselves open to more random love connections that cut across lines of race and class and everything else that divides us. We're doing our part to keep society more open, more diverse, less stratified.

Even if we come to the popular apps with certain racial or class preferences, we can still allow ourselves to be surprised by an unusual match, to think outside our normal boxes, at least for the length of one date. We have nothing to lose but our preconceptions.

We still haven't determined the name of this vast global game we're playing, or what the final boss level will be. But let's hope it's less of a snobby, royalty-based medieval Reigns game, and more of a vast, experimental, hot melting pot. Call it Global Thermonuclear Love.

More from Love App-tually

My terrible online dates live on as zombies on Instagram

Finstas make online dating so much more complicated

The rise of the Tinder-themed wedding

WATCH: Arturo Castro talks about the first time he dated a vegan

#_author:Chris Taylor #_uuid:4ca8d53b-72a3-34db-8cd5-9549729f96e0 #_category:yct:001000002 #_lmsid:a0Vd000000DTrEpEAL #_revsp:news.mashable

0 notes

marymosley · 4 years

Text

Reports and Statistics of Crime in India in 20-21 century: The changes

1. Introduction

Crimes that are being reported in the past have shown a radical change. On one hand, in the 21st century, conventional crimes like murder, robbery, theft, and burglary have shown a declining phenomenon. Whilst on the other hand such crimes have been replaced by less violent crimes like counterfeiting, cheating, criminal breach of trust, bank fraud, cyber bullying, cyber pornography, etc. Such a shift in the dimension of crime from the 20th century to the 21st century is a result of a change in socio-economic phenomenon mainly due to globalization and the advancement of technology. Crimes like trafficking in narcotics, fraudulent financial deal, money laundering, Trojan attacks, cyber bullying, cyber warfare are adding new dimensions to crime set up.

2. Change in trends of violent and property crimes.

Before the end of the 20th century, violent crimes like murder, burglary, rioting, theft, and robbery were rampant. But the beginning of the 21st century shows a sharp decline in such crimes, mainly due to a more robust policing system in the country. The UN office on Drugs and Crime stated in its 2019 report stated that the overall homicide cases in India have dropped by 10%. According to the NCRB report, during the period of 2009 to 2015, the shift in homicide cases is from 3.8 to 3.4 per 1,000,000 population. It is important to note that while cases like theft, burglary, and rioting showed a sharp decline of 74%, 54%, and 51% respectively in the period of 1971 to 2015, the murder rate decreased by only 3%. All the four crime series viz, murder, theft, burglary, and rioting, following the similar pathways initially, peaked in 1974 and troughed immediately for 1–2 years before starting an upward trend. Unexpectedly, all rates, except that of murder, declined.[1]

Almost all the categories of crime in the field of violent crimes have shown a either sharp decrease or a feasible decrease. But the crime of rape has shown inconsistency with the other set of crimes. The rape rate showed a continuously increasing trend between 1971 and 2011, with the exceptional brief of pause between 1998 and 2003 when it stabilized. According to the data of NCRB, during the period of 1971-2011, the murder rate declined by 3%, while the rape rate increased by 351%.

3. Change in trends of crime against Children

Crime against children is considered as one of the most disastrous crimes. Efforts are made in order to afoot the exodus of such menace from the society but the crime is increasing with expedient rate and has spread larger roots in the 21st century than 20th century. Crime against children includes child rape, kidnapping, abduction, procuration of minor girls, selling and buying of girls for prostitution, abetment of suicide, exposure and abandonment, infanticide, foeticide, and child marriage restraint.[2]

In the report of NCRB of 1996, the year of 1997 showed the percentage variation of 57.8% from 1993 in child rape, kidnapping, and abduction. According to the NCRB report of 2015, kidnapping and abduction have shown the maximum number of cases within the ambit of offenses against children during the period of 2000-2015. While during the period of 1990 to 2000, child rape has shown the maximum number of cases. But still, there was an increase in the number of rape cases from 2,499 cases to 10,854 cases from 1990 to 2015. During the period of 1994 to 2015, the number of crime against children increased from 5,821 cases to 56,567 cases, showing an increase of 89%.

Children are the most vulnerable class of society and considered as the most valuable asset for a developed nation. In order to curb the menace of crime against children several legislations under Indian Penal code, as well as special and local laws, have been formulated, like, protection of Children from Sexual Offences, Child labor (Prohibition & Regulation) Act, 1986, Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, and Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 etc. But such legislations are unable to either slow down or diminish the rampant growth of offenses against children.[3]

4. Emergence of Cyber Crime

In the 21st century, it does not matter how many weapons you are carrying but instead, your efficiency with respect to technology matters the most. The increase rate of advancement in the field of technology prove to be boon as well as a bane. On one hand, it increased the efficiency of humans, while on the other hand, it resulted in the emergence of new variants of crime, viz Cyber Crime. Capacity to store data, easy accessibility, complexity, and loss of evidence are some of the factors which helped such crime to flourish in 21st century. The modes and manners of committing Cyber Crimes include unauthorized users access to computer systems like hacking to the computer, theft of information including in electronic form, email bombing, virus attacks, and salami attacks, etc.

On the basis of perpetrators and the motive crimes committed by the use of technology can be divided into four parts viz, cyber crime, cyber warfare, cyber espionage, and cyber-terrorism. During the period 2010-2018, the cases increased from 966 to 27,248 cases, showing an increase of 96%.[4] In the initial years of the formation of NCRB, the heading of cyber crime did not find its place in the annual reports of the institution. But with the advancement of technology, cybercrime has become the most prominent crime in society while increasing with an exponential rate. The report of NCRB in 2010 reported an increase of 50% cybercrimes over the previous year. While in 2017 the cyber crime increased by 77%. According to the NCRB report, cyber crime has also evolved itself to include different variants of cyber crime within itself like the circulation of nude pictures. In 2015-2016 out of 569 cases out of 5987 cyber crime cases were motivated by sexual exploitation. Such incidents of crime have increased by 107% in recent years. Apart from this, other sets of crimes in the ambit of cyber crime include, inter alia, tapering computer source document, misrepresentation, and suppression of facts, cyber stalking, cyber bullying of crimes, defamation, and morphing.

Due to such rampant increase of cyber crimes in India, lead the government to make an exclusive and separate set of legislation, viz Information Act 2000, to deal with the rampant of cyber crimes.

5. Emergence of Economic offenses

The increase in industrialization and globalization lead to the emergence of a new set of crime, namely, white collar/blue collar crimes or simply put economic offenses. Economic offenses are the manifestation of criminal acts dine either solely or in an organized manner with or without associates or gangs with an intent to earn wealth through illegal means, and carry out illicit activities violating the laws of the land, other regulatory, statutory provisions governing the economic activities of the government and its administration.[5] In the starting of 20th century such offenses are not in large numbers and hence, the chapter of economic offenses did not find its place in NCRB annual reports for 50 years. In 1994, the chapter of “economic offenses” was incorporated in NCRB annual reports for the very first time. Crimes associated with economic offenses include smuggling, money laundering, tax evasion, export and import offenses, drug trafficking, trading in cultural property, bribery, corruption, and bank frauds.

In the 2015 report of NCRB data, the increase in the cases of economic offenses doubled in the last decade. In the 2017 report of NCRB, it was reported that the maximum number of crimes in the ambit of economic offenses are related to forgery, cheating, and fraud with 21,152 cases in 2017. In the year of 1994, the removal of government officials during the departmental proceedings for bribery and corruption was 3 and dismissal was 7. But in year 2002 removal spiked to 109. In the period of 1994 the categories of public servants involved in regular dept. The action was 1869, while in the year of 2003, it spiked to 5,888 cases.

Taking into consideration of such rampant increase of cases, several legislations were made to effectively deal with the menace of such economic offenses.

6. Conclusion

The cultural, social, and economic changes in society contribute to the change in the trends of the crime of the state. Apart from this, the other factors influencing crime trends are the effectiveness of aggressive law enforcement practices and science & technology. Poverty in any country affects largely the crime of any country. Newly emerged crimes are, somewhat, unable to effectively dealt by the government to the novelty associated with the crime. Hence, the unavailability of robust legislation and mechanism to effectively deal with the menace of such crimes, resulted in their expansion.[6]

Apart from this, it is also pertinent to note that such crime records are not fully reliable. The efficiency as well as the credibility of NCRB are often questioned upon due to the inconsistencies of records from several other surveys. This is mainly due to two reasons, firstly, NCRB relies on outdated population projections. Secondly, the methodology to compute crime rates is not consistent across the years, which makes a simple comparison of crime rates across years meaningless.[7] Several crimes which, prima facie, are creating a menace in the society have not been able to find its place in the reports of NHRC or any other identical reports. Lynching is one of the examples of such a discrepancy in the reports made by such institutions. Also, the statistics of such crimes are based only on the FIR registered by the police officials but it is pertinent to note that most of the cases in India went unregistered. According to the Safety Trends and Reporting of Crime survey conducted by a Mumbai based think-tank, IDFC Institute, only 6-8% of victims of theft in four major Indian cities lodged an FIR (first information report) with the police.

In conclusion, the progress of human civilization with the advancement of technology, economy, and social surrounding, did not result in the civilization of humans in true sense. But, on the contrary it resulted in the escalation of crime in the society while replacing conventional crimes.

[1] Crimes in India, NCRB report.

[2] Crimes in India, NCRB Report, 2015.

[3] Crime in India, NCRB Report, 2016.

[4] NCRB report

[5] Crimes in India, NCRB report, 1994.

[6] Lloyd E. Ohlin, Effect of Social Change on Crime and Law Enforcement, 43 Notre Dame L. Rev. 834 (1968)

[7] Priti pratishurthi Dash & Shreya Rastogi, The many Gaps in NCRB data, The Hindu, 29 Oct. 2019,

https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/the-many-gaps-in-ncrb-data/article29815998.ece

The post Reports and Statistics of Crime in India in 20-21 century: The changes appeared first on Legal Desire.

Reports and Statistics of Crime in India in 20-21 century: The changes published first on https://immigrationlawyerto.tumblr.com/

0 notes

betelhemmakonnen · 6 years

Text

Case Study #2 “How” / “When” / “Where” / “Who” / “Why” pictures Now: Louise Lawler’s works pose the image as a question

“The situation is always part of what produces the work for me.[1]

Lawler grew up in Bronxville, New York received her B.F.A at Cornell, before moving to Manhattan in 1969. She has been exhibiting her work since the late 1970's. An act of appropriation has always been present in her practice, from the very beginning of her career, Lawler has been interested in, "borrowing something that had a different context, different meaning."[2] Lawler’s time-based work provokes questions that make the viewer reflect upon the role of images as enforced systems of meaning production – as powerful mediators for picturing / representing / imagining a presented moment. Her works appear to function as proposal’s for self-interrogations, with Art, as the proxy subject, foregrounded interrogating itself by examining its relationship to art production, action of creating, in of the power dynamics of the Art World, as the context.

Why Pictures Now, 1981. Gelatin silver print, 3 × 6 inches.

The title of the above work by Louise Lawler, Why Pictures Now, does not end in a question mark, yet the image resists a declarative reading. Much to the contrary, it operates in a radically interrogative space. Punctuation is not necessary, the image itself becomes a question. Furthermore, playing with the parts of speech, if one reads “pictures” as a verb rather than a noun, the image opens up the possibility that maybe Lawler is asking us to consider how “Why” would picture “Now” – meaning, what does it look like when we examine the present in relationship to questions rather than answers.

I chose Louise Lawler for my second case study similarly to why I chose Renée Green for my first. Lawler’s practice views arrested time as a nevertheless mobile, multi-layered spacio-temporal environment. In addition, her distinctive creation of thoughtfully constructed settings that rely on unexpected juxtapositions of appropriations and re-appropriations, induce the viewer to extend the margins of her visual perception beyond, “What” to “How”, “Who “, “Where”, “Why” and “When am I looking at?” Her viewfinder frames a subtle yet powerful disturbance that awakes our visual processing to an all-encompassing disorienting experience, both visual and cognitive, rather than acute “punctum which pricks us” with the specific it moment associated with “good pictures.”[3]

“I don't exactly think I am a photographer. I'm just trying to point things out. I never feel like I am answering anything.”[4]

In Camera Lucida, Barthes states that the photographic image, “is the absolute Particular, the sovereign Contingency [...] the This [...] the Real, in its indefatigable expression.”[5] The photographer, according to Barthes, says, "Look. Here it is."[6] Louise Lawler’s oblique lens avoids such impudent declaratives by prioritizing questions and relationality over answers and an idea of an Absolute. For Lawler, a picture is not the event but how we understand the event and what connections we make."[7] Her images are created through repeated cycle of auto-negotiations and considerations of parts and pieces previously used in different times and situations. “Look.” Lawler seems to say, “Here? It? Is?” For what we see may seem different but is the same or may seem different but is the same as before.

An act of appropriation has always been present in her practice, from the very beginning of her career, Lawler has been interested in, "borrowing something that had a different context, different meaning."[8]

Installation view of Louise Lawler- WHY PICTURES NOW. The Museum of Modern Art, New York, April 30-July 30, 2017

“Why Pictures Now,” a survey exhibition spanning more than 40 years of Louise Lawler’s work opened at the MoMa in 2017. In this exhibition were featured three (re)works that Lawler referrers to as “adjusted to fit”: Pollyanna (adjusted to fit) 2007/2008/2012, Pollyanna (adjusted to fit, distorted for the times), 2007/2008/2012/2017, and Pollyanna (traced) 2007/2008/2013. She applies the distorted effect to an older work she created between 2007 and 2012. The traced version was created in collaboration with artist and children’s book illustrator Jon Buller in 2013.

An intriguing aspect of Lawler’s practice is her process of continuously re-presenting, reframing, or restaging her work in the present, a strategy through which the artist revisits her own pictures by transferring them to different formats, from photographs to paperweights, tracings, and works that she calls “adjusted to fit.” The tracings are large-format black-and-white line versions of her photographs that eliminate color and detail, functioning instead as “ghosts” of the originals. “Adjusted to fit” images are stretched or expanded to fit the location of their display, not only suggesting the idea that pictures can have more than one life, but also underpinning the intentional, relational character of Lawler’s farsighted art. Furthermore, in keeping with Lawler’s interest in each picture’s provenance and the institutional creation of values, each label in this exhibition includes the owners of the full edition of that particular work.[9]

In her seminal text, On Photography, Susan Sontag writes that "to take a picture is to have an interest in things as they are, in the status quo remaining unchanged (at least for as long as it takes to get a "good" picture), to be in complicity with whatever makes a subject interesting, worth photographing."[10] I don’t think that this applies to Lawler’s approach to her practice in the medium of photography.

Pollyanna (adjusted to fit, distorted for the times), 2007/2008/2012/2017 adhesive wall material, variable dimensions

The Pollyanna works enthusiastically refuse all of Sontag’s declarations. With this series, Lawler plays with auto-appropriations of appropriations and adjustments as needed, again and again to question the status quo – on the macro and micro level, the particular image and the larger world in which it circulates – from different tempo-spacial perspectives rather than picturing it as a static given. Every variable present is distorted: framing, scale, material, presentation, viewing, (…). In contrast to what Sontag says, Lawler as a photographer has no interest in things as they are, including photography, photographs or photographing. The images she creates break the imposed history of picture regulations.

Pollyanna (adjusted to fit) 2007/2008/2012 As adjusted for the MoMA exhibition WHY PICTURES NOW, 2017 variable dimensions

Pollyanna (traced) 2007/2008/2013 Adhesive vinyl, variable dimensions in proportion to size of original artwork: 30 1/8 x 24 1/8 in. (76.5 x 61.3 cm)

As difficult as it sounds, Pollyanna allegedly saw the best of every situation. Could it be that with these titles, Louise Lawler intends to communicate the same sentiment? Or, are the titles communicating that no matter the distortions and exaggeration in the environment, endless adjustments and fittings are necessary to ideally engage with the present? Or, is the reference to the phenomenon another layer of distortion to further destabilize any reading of the images that confirms preexisting beliefs or hypotheses? Louise Lawler’s pictures leave me with questions without answers.

[1] “Louise Lawler at MoMA.” Art Viewer, 16 July 2017, artviewer.org/louise-lawler-at-moma/.

[2] Sontag, Susan, 1933-2004. On Photography. New York :Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1977.

[3] Sontag, Susan, 1933-2004. On Photography. New York :Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1977

[4] “Louise Lawler: WHY PICTURES NOW.” Lee Bontecou. Untitled. 1959 | MoMA, Apr. 2017, www.moma.org/calendar/exhibitions/1646?page=2, accessed on Nov. 10, 2018.

[5] Barthes, Roland. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. New York: Hill and Wang, 1981, pg.4.

[6] ibid, pg.5.

[7] "Louise Lawler by James Welling BOMB Magazine." bombmagazine.org/articles/louise-lawler/, accessed on Nov. 12, 2018.

[8]Rachel Wolff (May 1, 2011), Impressive Proportions: Louise Lawler photographs great art—then treats it like taffy New York Magazine.

[9] Lawler, Louise. An Arrangement of Pictures. Assouline Publishing. New York. 2000.

[10] Rachel Wolff (May 1, 2011), Impressive Proportions: Louise Lawler photographs great art—then treats it like taffy New York Magazine.

0 notes

lovemesomesurveys · 3 years

Text

[zombiebandido]

Can you recommend any Neil Gaiman to me, aside from Stardust or Good Omens? I’m not familiar with his work.

What's the best concert you've been to, if you've been? Jonas Brothers and Green Day.

What's the funniest screenname you've ever seen? I’ve been on the internet since I was like 9 years old, I’ve come across many.

Is there an animal you like that most people don't? I don’t think so. Most people don’t seem to dislike giraffes, which are my favorite animal. <<< Same. And doggos.

Is there an animal that you think is overrated in terms of how it's liked? No.

Is there a time period you think is underrated? I’d love to bring the 90′s back, that’s all. <<< I’m in.

What about music? Hmm.

Do you find yourself listening to music that's a bit more esoteric? No.

What are your three favorite books and why? I’m gonna give you my three current favorite artists instead: AJ Rivers, Willow Rose, and Mary Stone. They’re murder mystery and psychological thriller authors with tons of books and I’ve really enjoyed the many I’ve read from each of them.

What about authors? ^^^ Do you have any likes you wouldn't tell someone until you got to know them? Hmm. I think things would just come up over time, not because I’m waiting to tell them.

Do you have a favorite language? Spanish.

What about a place you've always wanted to visit? I’d love to be able to travel all over.

What's something someone does or says that just makes you laugh? Tell me a lame dad joke. I’m a sucker for those. <<< lol I am, too. I came across a compilation post recently on here that was pretty great.

Do goldfish crackers ever make you sick, or is that just me? I’ve never had that issue.

Do you have a favorite art style? No.

Do you have a favorite myth/fairy-tale? There’s several I find interesting and enjoy.

Who is your favorite person aside from family? Alexander Skarsgard. ;)

Do any of your pets (if you have them) have weird quirks? My doggo is very quirky. She’s such a goofball.

Do you listen to music from anywhere besides America? Some.

Have you ever "quit" a site and came back to it more than once? I don’t think so.

Do you have an "odd" fascination with anything? Hm. I don’t think I have any “odd” fascinations.

What is the thing you want most at this moment? I’d really like to just feel decent today so I can enjoy a nice Easter with my family.

What was the last book you read and what was it about? I’m currently reading, “Cold Highway” by Mary Stone, which is the 4th book in a series.

What was the worst book you've ever read & why? I can’t believe I ever read the Fifty Shades of Gray books. *facepalm*

Do you have a favorite breed of dog or cat? Which? Labs and German Shepherds are awesome.

If you like any anime/manga, what are some titles you recommend? --

What do you think about school in general? I think it’s important to get an education. <<<

What's the hardest thing you've been through, & what did you learn from it? The accident that made me a paraplegic and everything that resulted from it ever since.

What are three "unrealistic" things you want most? Good health is the most unrealistic.

What are some of your favorite foods? Ramen, garlic parm and lemon pepper boneless wings from Wingstop, and scrambled eggs and biscuits smothered in country gravy.

Where do you like to buy your clothes? Boxlunch and Hot Topic.

Do you take any daily vitamins? No, but I definitely should be.

Who are three of your favorite fictional characters of all time? There’s so many to choose from, though.

If you had to give the world a pre-existing mythological/fictional being, what would it be? Superheroes, maybe?

When buying Slurpees, if you do, do you get only one flavor or mix them? I always liked mixing Coke and cherry together.

Do you have a favorite 7Eleven food? I liked getting snacks and drinks from there, but I never ate their pizza or hot dogs or anything of that sort.

Do you have any desire to learn (a) foreign language(s)? Which? I’d just like to be fluent in Spanish.

If you could have any career, "realistic"-ness aside, what would it be? I still don’t know.

What are three memorable movies from your childhood? Mary Kate and Ashley movies, Disney movies, and The Rugrats Movie. Ha, I know I cheated by grouping some together, but whatever.

Do you, personally, put a space after ellipses, or not? No.

What do some of the things that inspire you have in common? I haven’t felt inspired in a long time.

Micky D's sweet tea, y/n/other? I used to like it when I was younger. I couldn’t even tell you the last time I had it, though.

What are three of your best (non-physical) qualities? Blah.

What are three of your worst (again; non-physical) qualities? Blahhhh.

What is one of your firmest beliefs? My belief in God.

Do you ever question things until you're unsure of even the silliest thing? Sometimes.

Do you have anything that keeps you from doing something you'd truly enjoy? My health.

What are your three biggest pet peeves (personality-wise) in others? Arrogance, close-mindedness, and people who just jump on the bandwagon with certain things without doing their own research and forming their own opinions, not even really knowing what the issue is, they’re just following the crowd.

Do you work to fix your faults? Or at least, admit to them? I’m quick to own up and admit to all my faults, but do I do I shit about them? ...

What are three of your best physical qualities? (NOT EYES!) Blehhh.

What are some of your greatest aspirations? I don’t have any. :/

How do you hope the world will change, if at all? I wish we could see less division and violence.

Who are three (fairly known) people you find very intriguing? Hmm.

What are three things that make you the happiest? God, my family, and trips to the beach.

What is/are your view(s) on god, religion, spirituality, or relations to? I’m a Christian.

Are you arachnophobic or scared of spiders in the least? YES.

Do you play WoW? What do you think of it either way? Nope.

What kind of computer do you have? Windows 7/Vista/XP/Other? I have a MacBook Air, which currently runs on macOS Sierra.

What are you good at? Nothing.

What career do you hope to have? I really don’t know. :/

Are you taking any interesting classes in school/do you not attend? I’m finished with school.

If you don't attend, are you taking any "lessons" for anything? Nope.

A book/piece that has had an exceptional impact on your life? The Bible.

If you know of pandora.com, what is your favorite station? Actually, I was listening to Pandora recently for the first time in years and came across this 90s, 2000s, and Today’s Hits station that I was really enjoying.

Have you ever "lost" a friend in any way? How did you deal? Yeah, I’ve lost a lot of friends. Some were harder to deal with than others.

Any music recommendations? Check out that Pandora station.

What are at least three of your biggest fears? Losing my loved ones, death, and never getting better/getting worse.

Most recently read book that you liked? I’m currently reading, “Cold Highway” by Mary Stone, which is the 4th book in a series.

Do you have a piece of jewelry you don't like to take off? No. I haven’t worn jewelry in a long time.

Do you have a favorite quote? Why is it your favorite? I have many. Any odd pastimes you have? I don’t consider any of my pastimes odd.

Are you quirky in any way? (Name them please). My eating habits, for sure. I’m just really picky and particular.

Have any practices you aren't opposed to but wouldn't do yourself? Uhh.

Political standing?

Do you have any piercings/what do you think about piercings? I just have my earlobes pierced.

Do you have a favorite material? My soft, fuzzy throw blanket.

What are three names you'd name a pet if you HAD to get a pet right now? I don’t know. I’d have to see them and see what vibe I get.

Do you like to listen to dorky/amusing music? What would be considered dorky and amusing music?

Coffee vs. Tea vs. Energy Drinks: Order from favorite to least favorite. Coffee, energy drinks (only the Starbucks Doubleshot coffee energy drink), and tea.

Do you like more "fruity" sweets or "savory" sweets? Uhh, I like cupcakes, donuts, brownies, cookies, muffins, and cheesecake type of sweet.

What do you hate the most? My health, myself, and where I’m at in my life.

What genres of music are your favorite? I like variety.

Do you believe in true love? Yeah.

Do you believe in love at first sight? If yes, why? No.

What are some of your favorite clothing accessories? I just wear leggings and graphic tees.

If reincarnation exists, what sort of person would you want to be next? What are some things you believe strongly in? My faith.

Where's your favorite place you've been? Beaches and Disneyland.

What sort of books and movies do you like? Horror, psychological thriller, mystery, and YA for books, horror, psychological thrillers, drama, superhero films, some sci-fi and fantasy stuff like Star Wars, action, adventure, and romcoms for movies.

What's your favorite thing to do on a rainy Saturday? I don’t do anything different, but I do love when it rains.

Is there a book you've read that really touched you? Yeah.

Do you have a favorite artist? As in a painter? No.

PC or MAC? Mac.

What do you love doing? Spending time with my family, reading, scrolling through Tumblr, catching up on social media and trending topics, surveys, listening to ASMR, watching YouTube, watching my favorite shows, drinking coffee, sleeping...

If you could create the perfect world for yourself, what would it be? All my loved ones would be there, good health, money wouldn’t be a concern, happiness, I’d have a house on the beach, I’d be comfortable and relaxed and at peace... stuff like that.

Do you think that fate plays a part in people's lives? No.

Are you religious, spiritual, atheist...? I am a Christian.

What are your opinions on the media? There’s the good and bad. It can be pretty brutal and problematic, for sure.

Do you think that people throw the words "love" and "hate" around too much? Yes.

What is your favorite piece of technology that you own? My laptop and phone.

What's a piece of technology you'd like to own? I have what I want at the moment.

Are you afraid of technology developing to where we're too reliant on it? Oh, we’re waaaay past that point.

Does it bother you when people do things to fit in with a certain crowd? When they’re doing problematic things.

Hot or cold? I’d much rather be cold. I like being wrapped up in a blanket, wearing hoodies/sweatshirts, and drinking hot coffee. Being hot is just miserable. Do you think that Bzoink should extent the character amount for questions? I don’t use Bzoink.

Do you have a favorite combination of complimentary colors? A lot of colors look nice together.

Do you know why all the young people who have nice cars always look grumpy? I don’t think I’ve noticed that.

What's your favorite odd ice cream flavor? I don’t like any odd flavors. What’s with you and odd stuff?

Where do you like to get your ice cream? I’m not a big ice cream person, but the store is fine, ha. It was nice going somewhere like Cold Stone or something as well, though. I haven’t had ice cream in years, though.

What's your opinion on stereotypes/labels? Labels can be useful in some cases.

Do you ever use random word generators for Bzoinkoids?

Do you believe that history repeats itself? Absolutely. There’s proof of that.

Would you rather learn from your mistakes or just undo them? Ha, it’d be nice to be able to undo them.

What was the most interesting class you had in school? I always enjoyed English. And then of course I found a lot of my psych classes interesting. Do you write? If so, what? Nope.

Do you have a favorite website? Tumblr and YouTube.

Do you think that the quality of TV shows is going down? No, there’s so many good shows.

Do you have a favorite culture? Learning about different cultures is interesting. What was a story you heard as a child that really affected you? Hmm.

Who was your favorite grade-school teacher and why? Mr. McG, my 4th and then 8th grade teacher. He was everyone’s favorite. He made learning so much fun and really cared about his students.

Do you think that the world will end? How? Yes, how the Bible says it will.

Do you believe in Global Warming? Have you researched it? Yes.

Do you prefer piercings or tattoos? I only have my earlobes pierced and I have zero tattoos, soo I can’t say I’m big on either one.

Do you remember your dreams? Very, very rarely.

#personal #text #survey #surveys #long survey

0 notes

xcellsofgalaxyx-blog · 6 years

Text

IMPACT 27

Labelling In California

Alarmed by the opinion of the International Center for Research on Cancer (IARC), California is the first American State to recognize in March 2017 the glyphosate as a carcinogen. On 7 July, the Office of Risk Assessment in Environmental Health (OEHHA) adds the herbicide to the proposal 65, an act which list a series of chemicals that would be notably at the origin of cancer or birth defects. “California has a very progressive approach on environmental and health questions”, considers François Veillerette, Director and Spokesperson of the Association for the defense of the environment of future generations. A decision which leads on the labelling in the trade of bottles containing of glyphosate. Monsanto contests. Very procedural, the firm of Saint-Louis removal complaint against the OEHHA, but is dismissed at first instance and then on appeal. Today, more than 3 000 Americans have filed a lawsuit against Monsanto. “All suffer from a non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after having been exposed to Roundup of Monsanto, written Marie-Monique Robin in the Roundup in the face of its judges, published on 19 October. Folder that is today part of the Monsanto papers.” The trial is pending of instruction. Local restrictions in Argentina Before that Argentina does not become a major producer of transgenic soya, the basis of the global breeding, its farmers grew wheat, vegetables… and then the crisis is arrival. He had to make a rapid return of the money in the coffers of the State. Between 2000 and 2017, “Cultures of soybeans are increased from 8.3 million to 21 million hectares”, or 60 per cent of the cultivated land. And Monsanto has provided to farmers the seeds and pesticides. “In 2009, Argentina applied manure 200 million liters of glyphosate,” says Christine Seghezzi, Director of the docuHistoires of the plain out the 30 August, relying on Andres Carrasco, of the University of Buenos Aires. The Argentine soils have one of the highest concentrations of glyphosate in the world. The scientist has conducted a study, published in 2009 in the journal Chemical Research in Toxicology. It concludes that “the direct effects of glyphosate on the early mechanisms of morphogenesis in vertebrate embryos are a concern, because we could observe the same clinical results in children born in populations exposed to glyphosate herbicides which are used in the agricultural fields”. Between 2000 and 2010, the rate of cancers would have been multiplied by three and congenital malformations by four. A “silent genocide”, as called Marie-Monique Robin. “Indispensable Tool” Then remains the argument that there is no Plan B. “Has this date, there is no satisfactory alternative to glyphosate”, “an indispensable tool for the farm France”, wrote the MTG on its web site. The herbicide, which approximately 8 000 tonnes are sold each year in France, “would be the most effective way for weeding. It reduces production costs and the time required to prepare the soil before the implantation of cultures and guarantees of agricultural yields high”, argue the industrialists. And Stripping a survey commissioned Ipsos and realized in March with “904 farmers and a dozen of agricultural experts, industrial and institutional”, according to which two thirds of the French farmers use of glyphosate and “more than 80% of agricultural users believe that the molecule is important for their exploitation”. A molecule “especially employed in large crops, especially cereals (85% of the professionals) and viticulture (84%)”. Its withdrawal would have “with serious economic consequences”. “It would increase the cost of production (up to 18% for the grape growers), a decline in yields (13% in viticulture) and, in fine, a decline in profitability”. With the key, a “decline in exports to the height of nearly 2 billion euros for the only grain channels and wine”. There is no ready more little attention, as accustomed to this new practice: the “Binge Drinking” or biture Express, which consists to consume very quickly a very large quantity of alcohol at the time. It would even seem that this practice is entry in the mores. In the United States, it is estimated that approximately 90% of the alcohol consumed by young people under the age of 21 is bu at défonces ethyl. In France, it has become almost an obligation. “Between 13 and 25 years, it is necessary to pass today so almost inescapable by this ritual,” write the professor Benyamina Amine, Chief of the service of addictology of The Hospital Paul-Brousse near Paris, and the Journalist Marie-Pierre Samitier, in a book which is a cry of alarm (1). And for a fact… the figures concerned. At the time of the Survey on the health and the drinks at the occasion of the call of preparation to the defense (ESCAPAD), more than half of the young declares to have as well been drunk during the course of his life, and more than a quarter have known at least three episodes of drunkenness in the course of the last twelve months. The so-called drinkers casual, that is to say of the adolescents who have bu that once or twice in the past thirty days prior to the survey, reveal themselves in continuous progression since 2007 where they were 30.7%: 37.5% in 2008, 43.9% in 2011, 45.4% in 2014… Other data still, “If Among these practitioners of “binge drinking”, boys are still in 2014 more numerous than the girls to have drank at least five glasses in a same opportunity during the course of the month elapsed (54.6%), they were all the same 42.9% to have done”. Low profile. In presenting, this Friday morning, their plan to combat the medical deserts to Châlus (Haute-Vienne) on the occasion of the opening of a new House of Health, the Prime Minister and the Minister of Health have been in chick ads. The public authorities wishing to especially “facilitate local initiatives” and insist on the need to “innovative organizations in each Territory”. A caution amply justified, the usual bombast on the subject not having made a lot of solutions. In fact, for almost ten years, the question returns to loop. Each Chairman and each minister of Health announced their plan to improve access to care in territories deserted. In 2007, Nicolas Sarkozy, just elected, launched its program, providing for “the increase in the number of students trained doctors” and proposing “that the practitioner is installed in an area of medical desert is better paid than the one who exercises in the cities where there are too many doctors”. Once again in February 2010?: Sarkozy asking “solemnly” at its Minister “to engage with the territorial communities a triennial plan of creation of Houses of multidisciplinary health”. Arrives Holland, and the… Three plans of Marisol Touraine. In December 2012, are thus presented twelve measures to encourage physicians to install in the deserts Medical, with a “Pact territory health”. November 2015, new plan with a goal?: to facilitate the installation of 500 doctors just graduates. October 2016, it starts all over again?: new measures with including the granting of a “premium of engagement” between 10?000 and 30?000 euros to young graduates who will commit to pass the competition of hospital practitioner and to stay, once regularized, at least three years in place. Paradox The result of these ten plans in ten years?? The situation is not improving. The medical deserts persist. They extend even in large urban areas with difficulties of access to the care of specialists. And yet, Paradox, France has never counted as many doctors?: almost 216?000 practitioners in identified activity on 1 January, a slight increase since ten years (+?0.9?%). Are looking for the error…Labelling In California Alarmed by the opinion of the International Center for Research on Cancer (IARC), California is the first American State to recognize in March 2017 the glyphosate as a carcinogen. On 7 July, the Office of Risk Assessment in Environmental Health (OEHHA) adds the herbicide to the proposal 65, an act which list a series of chemicals that would be notably at the origin of cancer or birth defects. “California has a very progressive approach on environmental and health questions”, considers François Veillerette, Director and Spokesperson of the Association for the defense of the environment of future generations. A decision which leads on the labelling in the trade of bottles containing of glyphosate. Monsanto contests. Very procedural, the firm of Saint-Louis removal complaint against the OEHHA, but is dismissed at first instance and then on appeal. Today, more than 3 000 Americans have filed a lawsuit against Monsanto. “All suffer from a non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after having been exposed to Roundup of Monsanto, written Marie-Monique Robin in the Roundup in the face of its judges, published on 19 October. Folder that is today part of the Monsanto papers.” The trial is pending of instruction. Local restrictions in Argentina Before that Argentina does not become a major producer of transgenic soya, the basis of the global breeding, its farmers grew wheat, vegetables… and then the crisis is arrival. He had to make a rapid return of the money in the coffers of the State. Between 2000 and 2017, “Cultures of soybeans are increased from 8.3 million to 21 million hectares”, or 60 per cent of the cultivated land. And Monsanto has provided to farmers the seeds and pesticides. “In 2009, Argentina applied manure 200 million liters of glyphosate,” says Christine Seghezzi, Director of the docuHistoires of the plain out the 30 August, relying on Andres Carrasco, of the University of Buenos Aires. The Argentine soils have one of the highest concentrations of glyphosate in the world. The scientist has conducted a study, published in 2009 in the journal Chemical Research in Toxicology. It concludes that “the direct effects of glyphosate on the early mechanisms of morphogenesis in vertebrate embryos are a concern, because we could observe the same clinical results in children born in populations exposed to glyphosate herbicides which are used in the agricultural fields”. Between 2000 and 2010, the rate of cancers would have been multiplied by three and congenital malformations by four. A “silent genocide”, as called Marie-Monique Robin. “Indispensable Tool” Then remains the argument that there is no Plan B. “Has this date, there is no satisfactory alternative to glyphosate”, “an indispensable tool for the farm France”, wrote the MTG on its web site. The herbicide, which approximately 8 000 tonnes are sold each year in France, “would be the most effective way for weeding. It reduces production costs and the time required to prepare the soil before the implantation of cultures and guarantees of agricultural yields high”, argue the industrialists. And Stripping a survey commissioned Ipsos and realized in March with “904 farmers and a dozen of agricultural experts, industrial and institutional”, according to which two thirds of the French farmers use of glyphosate and “more than 80% of agricultural users believe that the molecule is important for their exploitation”. A molecule “especially employed in large crops, especially cereals (85% of the professionals) and viticulture (84%)”. Its withdrawal would have “with serious economic consequences”. “It would increase the cost of production (up to 18% for the grape growers), a decline in yields (13% in viticulture) and, in fine, a decline in profitability”. With the key, a “decline in exports to the height of nearly 2 billion euros for the only grain channels and wine”. There is no ready more little attention, as accustomed to this new practice: the “Binge Drinking” or biture Express, which consists to consume very quickly a very large quantity of alcohol at the time. It would even seem that this practice is entry in the mores. In the United States, it is estimated that approximately 90% of the alcohol consumed by young people under the age of 21 is bu at défonces ethyl. In France, it has become almost an obligation. “Between 13 and 25 years, it is necessary to pass today so almost inescapable by this ritual,” write the professor Benyamina Amine, Chief of the service of addictology of The Hospital Paul-Brousse near Paris, and the Journalist Marie-Pierre Samitier, in a book which is a cry of alarm (1). And for a fact… the figures concerned. At the time of the Survey on the health and the drinks at the occasion of the call of preparation to the defense (ESCAPAD), more than half of the young declares to have as well been drunk during the course of his life, and more than a quarter have known at least three episodes of drunkenness in the course of the last twelve months. The so-called drinkers casual, that is to say of the adolescents who have bu that once or twice in the past thirty days prior to the survey, reveal themselves in continuous progression since 2007 where they were 30.7%: 37.5% in 2008, 43.9% in 2011, 45.4% in 2014… Other data still, “If Among these practitioners of “binge drinking”, boys are still in 2014 more numerous than the girls to have drank at least five glasses in a same opportunity during the course of the month elapsed (54.6%), they were all the same 42.9% to have done”. Low profile. In presenting, this Friday morning, their plan to combat the medical deserts to Châlus (Haute-Vienne) on the occasion of the opening of a new House of Health, the Prime Minister and the Minister of Health have been in chick ads. The public authorities wishing to especially “facilitate local initiatives” and insist on the need to “innovative organizations in each Territory”. A caution amply justified, the usual bombast on the subject not having made a lot of solutions. In fact, for almost ten years, the question returns to loop. Each Chairman and each minister of Health announced their plan to improve access to care in territories deserted. In 2007, Nicolas Sarkozy, just elected, launched its program, providing for “the increase in the number of students trained doctors” and proposing “that the practitioner is installed in an area of medical desert is better paid than the one who exercises in the cities where there are too many doctors”. Once again in February 2010?: Sarkozy asking “solemnly” at its Minister “to engage with the territorial communities a triennial plan of creation of Houses of multidisciplinary health”. Arrives Holland, and the… Three plans of Marisol Touraine. In December 2012, are thus presented twelve measures to encourage physicians to install in the deserts Medical, with a “Pact territory health”. November 2015, new plan with a goal?: to facilitate the installation of 500 doctors just graduates. October 2016, it starts all over again?: new measures with including the granting of a “premium of engagement” between 10?000 and 30?000 euros to young graduates who will commit to pass the competition of hospital practitioner and to stay, once regularized, at least three years in place. Paradox The result of these ten plans in ten years?? The situation is not improving. The medical deserts persist. They extend even in large urban areas with difficulties of access to the care of specialists. And yet, Paradox, France has never counted as many doctors?: almost 216?000 practitioners in identified activity on 1 January, a slight increase since ten years (+?0.9?%). Are looking for the error…Labelling In California Alarmed by the opinion of the International Center for Research on Cancer (IARC), California is the first American State to recognize in March 2017 the glyphosate as a carcinogen. On 7 July, the Office of Risk Assessment in Environmental Health (OEHHA) adds the herbicide to the proposal 65, an act which list a series of chemicals that would be notably at the origin of cancer or birth defects. “California has a very progressive approach on environmental and health questions”, considers François Veillerette, Director and Spokesperson of the Association for the defense of the environment of future generations. A decision which leads on the labelling in the trade of bottles containing of glyphosate. Monsanto contests. Very procedural, the firm of Saint-Louis removal complaint against the OEHHA, but is dismissed at first instance and then on appeal. Today, more than 3 000 Americans have filed a lawsuit against Monsanto. “All suffer from a non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after having been exposed to Roundup of Monsanto, written Marie-Monique Robin in the Roundup in the face of its judges, published on 19 October. Folder that is today part of the Monsanto papers.” The trial is pending of instruction. Local restrictions in Argentina Before that Argentina does not become a major producer of transgenic soya, the basis of the global breeding, its farmers grew wheat, vegetables… and then the crisis is arrival. He had to make a rapid return of the money in the coffers of the State. Between 2000 and 2017, “Cultures of soybeans are increased from 8.3 million to 21 million hectares”, or 60 per cent of the cultivated land. And Monsanto has provided to farmers the seeds and pesticides. “In 2009, Argentina applied manure 200 million liters of glyphosate,” says Christine Seghezzi, Director of the docuHistoires of the plain out the 30 August, relying on Andres Carrasco, of the University of Buenos Aires. The Argentine soils have one of the highest concentrations of glyphosate in the world. The scientist has conducted a study, published in 2009 in the journal Chemical Research in Toxicology. It concludes that “the direct effects of glyphosate on the early mechanisms of morphogenesis in vertebrate embryos are a concern, because we could observe the same clinical results in children born in populations exposed to glyphosate herbicides which are used in the agricultural fields”. Between 2000 and 2010, the rate of cancers would have been multiplied by three and congenital malformations by four. A “silent genocide”, as called Marie-Monique Robin. “Indispensable Tool” Then remains the argument that there is no Plan B. “Has this date, there is no satisfactory alternative to glyphosate”, “an indispensable tool for the farm France”, wrote the MTG on its web site. The herbicide, which approximately 8 000 tonnes are sold each year in France, “would be the most effective way for weeding. It reduces production costs and the time required to prepare the soil before the implantation of cultures and guarantees of agricultural yields high”, argue the industrialists. And Stripping a survey commissioned Ipsos and realized in March with “904 farmers and a dozen of agricultural experts, industrial and institutional”, according to which two thirds of the French farmers use of glyphosate and “more than 80% of agricultural users believe that the molecule is important for their exploitation”. A molecule “especially employed in large crops, especially cereals (85% of the professionals) and viticulture (84%)”. Its withdrawal would have “with serious economic consequences”. “It would increase the cost of production (up to 18% for the grape growers), a decline in yields (13% in viticulture) and, in fine, a decline in profitability”. With the key, a “decline in exports to the height of nearly 2 billion euros for the only grain channels and wine”. There is no ready more little attention, as accustomed to this new practice: the “Binge Drinking” or biture Express, which consists to consume very quickly a very large quantity of alcohol at the time. It would even seem that this practice is entry in the mores. In the United States, it is estimated that approximately 90% of the alcohol consumed by young people under the age of 21 is bu at défonces ethyl. In France, it has become almost an obligation. “Between 13 and 25 years, it is necessary to pass today so almost inescapable by this ritual,” write the professor Benyamina Amine, Chief of the service of addictology of The Hospital Paul-Brousse near Paris, and the Journalist Marie-Pierre Samitier, in a book which is a cry of alarm (1). And for a fact… the figures concerned. At the time of the Survey on the health and the drinks at the occasion of the call of preparation to the defense (ESCAPAD), more than half of the young declares to have as well been drunk during the course of his life, and more than a quarter have known at least three episodes of drunkenness in the course of the last twelve months. The so-called drinkers casual, that is to say of the adolescents who have bu that once or twice in the past thirty days prior to the survey, reveal themselves in continuous progression since 2007 where they were 30.7%: 37.5% in 2008, 43.9% in 2011, 45.4% in 2014… Other data still, “If Among these practitioners of “binge drinking”, boys are still in 2014 more numerous than the girls to have drank at least five glasses in a same opportunity during the course of the month elapsed (54.6%), they were all the same 42.9% to have done”. Low profile. In presenting, this Friday morning, their plan to combat the medical deserts to Châlus (Haute-Vienne) on the occasion of the opening of a new House of Health, the Prime Minister and the Minister of Health have been in chick ads. The public authorities wishing to especially “facilitate local initiatives” and insist on the need to “innovative organizations in each Territory”. A caution amply justified, the usual bombast on the subject not having made a lot of solutions. In fact, for almost ten years, the question returns to loop. Each Chairman and each minister of Health announced their plan to improve access to care in territories deserted. In 2007, Nicolas Sarkozy, just elected, launched its program, providing for “the increase in the number of students trained doctors” and proposing “that the practitioner is installed in an area of medical desert is better paid than the one who exercises in the cities where there are too many doctors”. Once again in February 2010?: Sarkozy asking “solemnly” at its Minister “to engage with the territorial communities a triennial plan of creation of Houses of multidisciplinary health”. Arrives Holland, and the… Three plans of Marisol Touraine. In December 2012, are thus presented twelve measures to encourage physicians to install in the deserts Medical, with a “Pact territory health”. November 2015, new plan with a goal?: to facilitate the installation of 500 doctors just graduates. October 2016, it starts all over again?: new measures with including the granting of a “premium of engagement” between 10?000 and 30?000 euros to young graduates who will commit to pass the competition of hospital practitioner and to stay, once regularized, at least three years in place. Paradox The result of these ten plans in ten years?? The situation is not improving. The medical deserts persist. They extend even in large urban areas with difficulties of access to the care of specialists. And yet, Paradox, France has never counted as many doctors?: almost 216?000 practitioners in identified activity on 1 January, a slight increase since ten years (+?0.9?%). Are looking for the error…Labelling In California Alarmed by the opinion of the International Center for Research on Cancer (IARC), California is the first American State to recognize in March 2017 the glyphosate as a carcinogen. On 7 July, the Office of Risk Assessment in Environmental Health (OEHHA) adds the herbicide to the proposal 65, an act which list a series of chemicals that would be notably at the origin of cancer or birth defects. “California has a very progressive approach on environmental and health questions”, considers François Veillerette, Director and Spokesperson of the Association for the defense of the environment of future generations. A decision which leads on the labelling in the trade of bottles containing of glyphosate. Monsanto contests. Very procedural, the firm of Saint-Louis removal complaint against the OEHHA, but is dismissed at first instance and then on appeal. Today, more than 3 000 Americans have filed a lawsuit against Monsanto. “All suffer from a non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after having been exposed to Roundup of Monsanto, written Marie-Monique Robin in the Roundup in the face of its judges, published on 19 October. Folder that is today part of the Monsanto papers.” The trial is pending of instruction. Local restrictions in Argentina Before that Argentina does not become a major producer of transgenic soya, the basis of the global breeding, its farmers grew wheat, vegetables… and then the crisis is arrival. He had to make a rapid return of the money in the coffers of the State. Between 2000 and 2017, “Cultures of soybeans are increased from 8.3 million to 21 million hectares”, or 60 per cent of the cultivated land. And Monsanto has provided to farmers the seeds and pesticides. “In 2009, Argentina applied manure 200 million liters of glyphosate,” says Christine Seghezzi, Director of the docuHistoires of the plain out the 30 August, relying on Andres Carrasco, of the University of Buenos Aires. The Argentine soils have one of the highest concentrations of glyphosate in the world. The scientist has conducted a study, published in 2009 in the journal Chemical Research in Toxicology. It concludes that “the direct effects of glyphosate on the early mechanisms of morphogenesis in vertebrate embryos are a concern, because we could observe the same clinical results in children born in populations exposed to glyphosate herbicides which are used in the agricultural fields”. Between 2000 and 2010, the rate of cancers would have been multiplied by three and congenital malformations by four. A “silent genocide”, as called Marie-Monique Robin. “Indispensable Tool” Then remains the argument that there is no Plan B. “Has this date, there is no satisfactory alternative to glyphosate”, “an indispensable tool for the farm France”, wrote the MTG on its web site. The herbicide, which approximately 8 000 tonnes are sold each year in France, “would be the most effective way for weeding. It reduces production costs and the time required to prepare the soil before the implantation of cultures and guarantees of agricultural yields high”, argue the industrialists. And Stripping a survey commissioned Ipsos and realized in March with “904 farmers and a dozen of agricultural experts, industrial and institutional”, according to which two thirds of the French farmers use of glyphosate and “more than 80% of agricultural users believe that the molecule is important for their exploitation”. A molecule “especially employed in large crops, especially cereals (85% of the professionals) and viticulture (84%)”. Its withdrawal would have “with serious economic consequences”. “It would increase the cost of production (up to 18% for the grape growers), a decline in yields (13% in viticulture) and, in fine, a decline in profitability”. With the key, a “decline in exports to the height of nearly 2 billion euros for the only grain channels and wine”. There is no ready more little attention, as accustomed to this new practice: the “Binge Drinking” or biture Express, which consists to consume very quickly a very large quantity of alcohol at the time. It would even seem that this practice is entry in the mores. In the United States, it is estimated that approximately 90% of the alcohol consumed by young people under the age of 21 is bu at défonces ethyl. In France, it has become almost an obligation. “Between 13 and 25 years, it is necessary to pass today so almost inescapable by this ritual,” write the professor Benyamina Amine, Chief of the service of addictology of The Hospital Paul-Brousse near Paris, and the Journalist Marie-Pierre Samitier, in a book which is a cry of alarm (1). And for a fact… the figures concerned. At the time of the Survey on the health and the drinks at the occasion of the call of preparation to the defense (ESCAPAD), more than half of the young declares to have as well been drunk during the course of his life, and more than a quarter have known at least three episodes of drunkenness in the course of the last twelve months. The so-called drinkers casual, that is to say of the adolescents who have bu that once or twice in the past thirty days prior to the survey, reveal themselves in continuous progression since 2007 where they were 30.7%: 37.5% in 2008, 43.9% in 2011, 45.4% in 2014… Other data still, “If Among these practitioners of “binge drinking”, boys are still in 2014 more numerous than the girls to have drank at least five glasses in a same opportunity during the course of the month elapsed (54.6%), they were all the same 42.9% to have done”. Low profile. In presenting, this Friday morning, their plan to combat the medical deserts to Châlus (Haute-Vienne) on the occasion of the opening of a new House of Health, the Prime Minister and the Minister of Health have been in chick ads. The public authorities wishing to especially “facilitate local initiatives” and insist on the need to “innovative organizations in each Territory”. A caution amply justified, the usual bombast on the subject not having made a lot of solutions. In fact, for almost ten years, the question returns to loop. Each Chairman and each minister of Health announced their plan to improve access to care in territories deserted. In 2007, Nicolas Sarkozy, just elected, launched its program, providing for “the increase in the number of students trained doctors” and proposing “that the practitioner is installed in an area of medical desert is better paid than the one who exercises in the cities where there are too many doctors”. Once again in February 2010?: Sarkozy asking “solemnly” at its Minister “to engage with the territorial communities a triennial plan of creation of Houses of multidisciplinary health”. Arrives Holland, and the… Three plans of Marisol Touraine. In December 2012, are thus presented twelve measures to encourage physicians to install in the deserts Medical, with a “Pact territory health”. November 2015, new plan with a goal?: to facilitate the installation of 500 doctors just graduates. October 2016, it starts all over again?: new measures with including the granting of a “premium of engagement” between 10?000 and 30?000 euros to young graduates who will commit to pass the competition of hospital practitioner and to stay, once regularized, at least three years in place. Paradox The result of these ten plans in ten years?? The situation is not improving. The medical deserts persist. They extend even in large urban areas with difficulties of access to the care of specialists. And yet, Paradox, France has never counted as many doctors?: almost 216?000 practitioners in identified activity on 1 January, a slight increase since ten years (+?0.9?%). Are looking for the error…Labelling In California Alarmed by the opinion of the International Center for Research on Cancer (IARC), California is the first American State to recognize in March 2017 the glyphosate as a carcinogen. On 7 July, the Office of Risk Assessment in Environmental Health (OEHHA) adds the herbicide to the proposal 65, an act which list a series of chemicals that would be notably at the origin of cancer or birth defects. “California has a very progressive approach on environmental and health questions”, considers François Veillerette, Director and Spokesperson of the Association for the defense of the environment of future generations. A decision which leads on the labelling in the trade of bottles containing of glyphosate. Monsanto contests. Very procedural, the firm of Saint-Louis removal complaint against the OEHHA, but is dismissed at first instance and then on appeal. Today, more than 3 000 Americans have filed a lawsuit against Monsanto. “All suffer from a non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after having been exposed to Roundup of Monsanto, written Marie-Monique Robin in the Roundup in the face of its judges, published on 19 October. Folder that is today part of the Monsanto papers.” The trial is pending of instruction. Local restrictions in Argentina Before that Argentina does not become a major producer of transgenic soya, the basis of the global breeding, its farmers grew wheat, vegetables… and then the crisis is arrival. He had to make a rapid return of the money in the coffers of the State. Between 2000 and 2017, “Cultures of soybeans are increased from 8.3 million to 21 million hectares”, or 60 per cent of the cultivated land. And Monsanto has provided to farmers the seeds and pesticides. “In 2009, Argentina applied manure 200 million liters of glyphosate,” says Christine Seghezzi, Director of the docuHistoires of the plain out the 30 August, relying on Andres Carrasco, of the University of Buenos Aires. The Argentine soils have one of the highest concentrations of glyphosate in the world. The scientist has conducted a study, published in 2009 in the journal Chemical Research in Toxicology. It concludes that “the direct effects of glyphosate on the early mechanisms of morphogenesis in vertebrate embryos are a concern, because we could observe the same clinical results in children born in populations exposed to glyphosate herbicides which are used in the agricultural fields”. Between 2000 and 2010, the rate of cancers would have been multiplied by three and congenital malformations by four. A “silent genocide”, as called Marie-Monique Robin. “Indispensable Tool” Then remains the argument that there is no Plan B. “Has this date, there is no satisfactory alternative to glyphosate”, “an indispensable tool for the farm France”, wrote the MTG on its web site. The herbicide, which approximately 8 000 tonnes are sold each year in France, “would be the most effective way for weeding. It reduces production costs and the time required to prepare the soil before the implantation of cultures and guarantees of agricultural yields high”, argue the industrialists. And Stripping a survey commissioned Ipsos and realized in March with “904 farmers and a dozen of agricultural experts, industrial and institutional”, according to which two thirds of the French farmers use of glyphosate and “more than 80% of agricultural users believe that the molecule is important for their exploitation”. A molecule “especially employed in large crops, especially cereals (85% of the professionals) and viticulture (84%)”. Its withdrawal would have “with serious economic consequences”. “It would increase the cost of production (up to 18% for the grape growers), a decline in yields (13% in viticulture) and, in fine, a decline in profitability”. With the key, a “decline in exports to the height of nearly 2 billion euros for the only grain channels and wine”. There is no ready more little attention, as accustomed to this new practice: the “Binge Drinking” or biture Express, which consists to consume very quickly a very large quantity of alcohol at the time. It would even seem that this practice is entry in the mores. In the United States, it is estimated that approximately 90% of the alcohol consumed by young people under the age of 21 is bu at défonces ethyl. In France, it has become almost an obligation. “Between 13 and 25 years, it is necessary to pass today so almost inescapable by this ritual,” write the professor Benyamina Amine, Chief of the service of addictology of The Hospital Paul-Brousse near Paris, and the Journalist Marie-Pierre Samitier, in a book which is a cry of alarm (1). And for a fact… the figures concerned. At the time of the Survey on the health and the drinks at the occasion of the call of preparation to the defense (ESCAPAD), more than half of the young declares to have as well been drunk during the course of his life, and more than a quarter have known at least three episodes of drunkenness in the course of the last twelve months. The so-called drinkers casual, that is to say of the adolescents who have bu that once or twice in the past thirty days prior to the survey, reveal themselves in continuous progression since 2007 where they were 30.7%: 37.5% in 2008, 43.9% in 2011, 45.4% in 2014… Other data still, “If Among these practitioners of “binge drinking”, boys are still in 2014 more numerous than the girls to have drank at least five glasses in a same opportunity during the course of the month elapsed (54.6%), they were all the same 42.9% to have done”. Low profile. In presenting, this Friday morning, their plan to combat the medical deserts to Châlus (Haute-Vienne) on the occasion of the opening of a new House of Health, the Prime Minister and the Minister of Health have been in chick ads. The public authorities wishing to especially “facilitate local initiatives” and insist on the need to “innovative organizations in each Territory”. A caution amply justified, the usual bombast on the subject not having made a lot of solutions. In fact, for almost ten years, the question returns to loop. Each Chairman and each minister of Health announced their plan to improve access to care in territories deserted. In 2007, Nicolas Sarkozy, just elected, launched its program, providing for “the increase in the number of students trained doctors” and proposing “that the practitioner is installed in an area of medical desert is better paid than the one who exercises in the cities where there are too many doctors”. Once again in February 2010?: Sarkozy asking “solemnly�� at its Minister “to engage with the territorial communities a triennial plan of creation of Houses of multidisciplinary health”. Arrives Holland, and the… Three plans of Marisol Touraine. In December 2012, are thus presented twelve measures to encourage physicians to install in the deserts Medical, with a “Pact territory health”. November 2015, new plan with a goal?: to facilitate the installation of 500 doctors just graduates. October 2016, it starts all over again?: new measures with including the granting of a “premium of engagement” between 10?000 and 30?000 euros to young graduates who will commit to pass the competition of hospital practitioner and to stay, once regularized, at least three years in place. Paradox The result of these ten plans in ten years?? The situation is not improving. The medical deserts persist. They extend even in large urban areas with difficulties of access to the care of specialists. And yet, Paradox, France has never counted as many doctors?: almost 216?000 practitioners in identified activity on 1 January, a slight increase since ten years (+?0.9?%). Are looking for the error…Labelling In California Alarmed by the opinion of the International Center for Research on Cancer (IARC), California is the first American State to recognize in March 2017 the glyphosate as a carcinogen. On 7 July, the Office of Risk Assessment in Environmental Health (OEHHA) adds the herbicide to the proposal 65, an act which list a series of chemicals that would be notably at the origin of cancer or birth defects. “California has a very progressive approach on environmental and health questions”, considers François Veillerette, Director and Spokesperson of the Association for the defense of the environment of future generations. A decision which leads on the labelling in the trade of bottles containing of glyphosate. Monsanto contests. Very procedural, the firm of Saint-Louis removal complaint against the OEHHA, but is dismissed at first instance and then on appeal. Today, more than 3 000 Americans have filed a lawsuit against Monsanto. “All suffer from a non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after having been exposed to Roundup of Monsanto, written Marie-Monique Robin in the Roundup in the face of its judges, published on 19 October. Folder that is today part of the Monsanto papers.” The trial is pending of instruction. Local restrictions in Argentina Before that Argentina does not become a major producer of transgenic soya, the basis of the global breeding, its farmers grew wheat, vegetables… and then the crisis is arrival. He had to make a rapid return of the money in the coffers of the State. Between 2000 and 2017, “Cultures of soybeans are increased from 8.3 million to 21 million hectares”, or 60 per cent of the cultivated land. And Monsanto has provided to farmers the seeds and pesticides. “In 2009, Argentina applied manure 200 million liters of glyphosate,” says Christine Seghezzi, Director of the docuHistoires of the plain out the 30 August, relying on Andres Carrasco, of the University of Buenos Aires. The Argentine soils have one of the highest concentrations of glyphosate in the world. The scientist has conducted a study, published in 2009 in the journal Chemical Research in Toxicology. It concludes that “the direct effects of glyphosate on the early mechanisms of morphogenesis in vertebrate embryos are a concern, because we could observe the same clinical results in children born in populations exposed to glyphosate herbicides which are used in the agricultural fields”. Between 2000 and 2010, the rate of cancers would have been multiplied by three and congenital malformations by four. A “silent genocide”, as called Marie-Monique Robin. “Indispensable Tool” Then remains the argument that there is no Plan B. “Has this date, there is no satisfactory alternative to glyphosate”, “an indispensable tool for the farm France”, wrote the MTG on its web site. The herbicide, which approximately 8 000 tonnes are sold each year in France, “would be the most effective way for weeding. It reduces production costs and the time required to prepare the soil before the implantation of cultures and guarantees of agricultural yields high”, argue the industrialists. And Stripping a survey commissioned Ipsos and realized in March with “904 farmers and a dozen of agricultural experts, industrial and institutional”, according to which two thirds of the French farmers use of glyphosate and “more than 80% of agricultural users believe that the molecule is important for their exploitation”. A molecule “especially employed in large crops, especially cereals (85% of the professionals) and viticulture (84%)”. Its withdrawal would have “with serious economic consequences”. “It would increase the cost of production (up to 18% for the grape growers), a decline in yields (13% in viticulture) and, in fine, a decline in profitability”. With the key, a “decline in exports to the height of nearly 2 billion euros for the only grain channels and wine”. There is no ready more little attention, as accustomed to this new practice: the “Binge Drinking” or biture Express, which consists to consume very quickly a very large quantity of alcohol at the time. It would even seem that this practice is entry in the mores. In the United States, it is estimated that approximately 90% of the alcohol consumed by young people under the age of 21 is bu at défonces ethyl. In France, it has become almost an obligation. “Between 13 and 25 years, it is necessary to pass today so almost inescapable by this ritual,” write the professor Benyamina Amine, Chief of the service of addictology of The Hospital Paul-Brousse near Paris, and the Journalist Marie-Pierre Samitier, in a book which is a cry of alarm (1). And for a fact… the figures concerned. At the time of the Survey on the health and the drinks at the occasion of the call of preparation to the defense (ESCAPAD), more than half of the young declares to have as well been drunk during the course of his life, and more than a quarter have known at least three episodes of drunkenness in the course of the last twelve months. The so-called drinkers casual, that is to say of the adolescents who have bu that once or twice in the past thirty days prior to the survey, reveal themselves in continuous progression since 2007 where they were 30.7%: 37.5% in 2008, 43.9% in 2011, 45.4% in 2014… Other data still, “If Among these practitioners of “binge drinking”, boys are still in 2014 more numerous than the girls to have drank at least five glasses in a same opportunity during the course of the month elapsed (54.6%), they were all the same 42.9% to have done”. Low profile. In presenting, this Friday morning, their plan to combat the medical deserts to Châlus (Haute-Vienne) on the occasion of the opening of a new House of Health, the Prime Minister and the Minister of Health have been in chick ads. The public authorities wishing to especially “facilitate local initiatives” and insist on the need to “innovative organizations in each Territory”. A caution amply justified, the usual bombast on the subject not having made a lot of solutions. In fact, for almost ten years, the question returns to loop. Each Chairman and each minister of Health announced their plan to improve access to care in territories deserted. In 2007, Nicolas Sarkozy, just elected, launched its program, providing for “the increase in the number of students trained doctors” and proposing “that the practitioner is installed in an area of medical desert is better paid than the one who exercises in the cities where there are too many doctors”. Once again in February 2010?: Sarkozy asking “solemnly” at its Minister “to engage with the territorial communities a triennial plan of creation of Houses of multidisciplinary health”. Arrives Holland, and the… Three plans of Marisol Touraine. In December 2012, are thus presented twelve measures to encourage physicians to install in the deserts Medical, with a “Pact territory health”. November 2015, new plan with a goal?: to facilitate the installation of 500 doctors just graduates. October 2016, it starts all over again?: new measures with including the granting of a “premium of engagement” between 10?000 and 30?000 euros to young graduates who will commit to pass the competition of hospital practitioner and to stay, once regularized, at least three years in place. Paradox The result of these ten plans in ten years?? The situation is not improving. The medical deserts persist. They extend even in large urban areas with difficulties of access to the care of specialists. And yet, Paradox, France has never counted as many doctors?: almost 216?000 practitioners in identified activity on 1 January, a slight increase since ten years (+?0.9?%). Are looking for the error…Labelling In California Alarmed by the opinion of the International Center for Research on Cancer (IARC), California is the first American State to recognize in March 2017 the glyphosate as a carcinogen. On 7 July, the Office of Risk Assessment in Environmental Health (OEHHA) adds the herbicide to the proposal 65, an act which list a series of chemicals that would be notably at the origin of cancer or birth defects. “California has a very progressive approach on environmental and health questions”, considers François Veillerette, Director and Spokesperson of the Association for the defense of the environment of future generations. A decision which leads on the labelling in the trade of bottles containing of glyphosate. Monsanto contests. Very procedural, the firm of Saint-Louis removal complaint against the OEHHA, but is dismissed at first instance and then on appeal. Today, more than 3 000 Americans have filed a lawsuit against Monsanto. “All suffer from a non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after having been exposed to Roundup of Monsanto, written Marie-Monique Robin in the Roundup in the face of its judges, published on 19 October. Folder that is today part of the Monsanto papers.” The trial is pending of instruction. Local restrictions in Argentina Before that Argentina does not become a major producer of transgenic soya, the basis of the global breeding, its farmers grew wheat, vegetables… and then the crisis is arrival. He had to make a rapid return of the money in the coffers of the State. Between 2000 and 2017, “Cultures of soybeans are increased from 8.3 million to 21 million hectares”, or 60 per cent of the cultivated land. And Monsanto has provided to farmers the seeds and pesticides. “In 2009, Argentina applied manure 200 million liters of glyphosate,” says Christine Seghezzi, Director of the docuHistoires of the plain out the 30 August, relying on Andres Carrasco, of the University of Buenos Aires. The Argentine soils have one of the highest concentrations of glyphosate in the world. The scientist has conducted a study, published in 2009 in the journal Chemical Research in Toxicology. It concludes that “the direct effects of glyphosate on the early mechanisms of morphogenesis in vertebrate embryos are a concern, because we could observe the same clinical results in children born in populations exposed to glyphosate herbicides which are used in the agricultural fields”. Between 2000 and 2010, the rate of cancers would have been multiplied by three and congenital malformations by four. A “silent genocide”, as called Marie-Monique Robin. “Indispensable Tool” Then remains the argument that there is no Plan B. “Has this date, there is no satisfactory alternative to glyphosate”, “an indispensable tool for the farm France”, wrote the MTG on its web site. The herbicide, which approximately 8 000 tonnes are sold each year in France, “would be the most effective way for weeding. It reduces production costs and the time required to prepare the soil before the implantation of cultures and guarantees of agricultural yields high”, argue the industrialists. And Stripping a survey commissioned Ipsos and realized in March with “904 farmers and a dozen of agricultural experts, industrial and institutional”, according to which two thirds of the French farmers use of glyphosate and “more than 80% of agricultural users believe that the molecule is important for their exploitation”. A molecule “especially employed in large crops, especially cereals (85% of the professionals) and viticulture (84%)”. Its withdrawal would have “with serious economic consequences”. “It would increase the cost of production (up to 18% for the grape growers), a decline in yields (13% in viticulture) and, in fine, a decline in profitability”. With the key, a “decline in exports to the height of nearly 2 billion euros for the only grain channels and wine”. There is no ready more little attention, as accustomed to this new practice: the “Binge Drinking” or biture Express, which consists to consume very quickly a very large quantity of alcohol at the time. It would even seem that this practice is entry in the mores. In the United States, it is estimated that approximately 90% of the alcohol consumed by young people under the age of 21 is bu at défonces ethyl. In France, it has become almost an obligation. “Between 13 and 25 years, it is necessary to pass today so almost inescapable by this ritual,” write the professor Benyamina Amine, Chief of the service of addictology of The Hospital Paul-Brousse near Paris, and the Journalist Marie-Pierre Samitier, in a book which is a cry of alarm (1). And for a fact… the figures concerned. At the time of the Survey on the health and the drinks at the occasion of the call of preparation to the defense (ESCAPAD), more than half of the young declares to have as well been drunk during the course of his life, and more than a quarter have known at least three episodes of drunkenness in the course of the last twelve months. The so-called drinkers casual, that is to say of the adolescents who have bu that once or twice in the past thirty days prior to the survey, reveal themselves in continuous progression since 2007 where they were 30.7%: 37.5% in 2008, 43.9% in 2011, 45.4% in 2014… Other data still, “If Among these practitioners of “binge drinking”, boys are still in 2014 more numerous than the girls to have drank at least five glasses in a same opportunity during the course of the month elapsed (54.6%), they were all the same 42.9% to have done”. Low profile. In presenting, this Friday morning, their plan to combat the medical deserts to Châlus (Haute-Vienne) on the occasion of the opening of a new House of Health, the Prime Minister and the Minister of Health have been in chick ads. The public authorities wishing to especially “facilitate local initiatives” and insist on the need to “innovative organizations in each Territory”. A caution amply justified, the usual bombast on the subject not having made a lot of solutions. In fact, for almost ten years, the question returns to loop. Each Chairman and each minister of Health announced their plan to improve access to care in territories deserted. In 2007, Nicolas Sarkozy, just elected, launched its program, providing for “the increase in the number of students trained doctors” and proposing “that the practitioner is installed in an area of medical desert is better paid than the one who exercises in the cities where there are too many doctors”. Once again in February 2010?: Sarkozy asking “solemnly” at its Minister “to engage with the territorial communities a triennial plan of creation of Houses of multidisciplinary health”. Arrives Holland, and the… Three plans of Marisol Touraine. In December 2012, are thus presented twelve measures to encourage physicians to install in the deserts Medical, with a “Pact territory health”. November 2015, new plan with a goal?: to facilitate the installation of 500 doctors just graduates. October 2016, it starts all over again?: new measures with including the granting of a “premium of engagement” between 10?000 and 30?000 euros to young graduates who will commit to pass the competition of hospital practitioner and to stay, once regularized, at least three years in place. Paradox The result of these ten plans in ten years?? The situation is not improving. The medical deserts persist. They extend even in large urban areas with difficulties of access to the care of specialists. And yet, Paradox, France has never counted as many doctors?: almost 216?000 practitioners in identified activity on 1 January, a slight increase since ten years (+?0.9?%). Are looking for the error…

0 notes

fadingpersoncollectorstuff-blog · 6 years

Text

alabama insurance license check

"alabama insurance license check

alabama insurance license check

BEST ANSWER: Try this site where you can compare quotes: : http://saleinsurancequotes.xyz/index.html?src=tumblr