#or how neither he nor kate seem to get that the sylki romance could be read as selfcest or incest bc they thought it was just like

[iamnmbr3]

the moment when you realize an ai would've written a better larry show than mike waldron bc an ai would've been trained on previous loki content and thus, unlike mike, would've actually watched the films

[iamnmbr3]

still not over the interview where he didn't even know that loki killed laufey even tho it was a pivotal character moment for him. or how neither he nor kate seem to get that the sylki romance could be read as selfcest or incest bc they thought it was just like miles/gwen bc they didn't realize  “loki” is a name not a title. so sylki isn't like miles/an alternate spider person. it's like miles/an alternate miles.

I genuinely think Mike Waldron is the worst writer I have ever come across. his lack of talent is truly staggering. Not that the others like Eric Martin are much better. Still wild to me that he basically copy pasted his abominable og script and changed a few names and no one cared, Ir that he could get away with openly messing up basic facts about the character in interviews and showing he never even watched the movies.

(Btw the point here is to show how abysmally poor the quality of the Larry show was. not to advocate for ai writing). Mike just couldn't even clear that very low bar. the answer is not ai. the answer was hiring actually competent writers.

And to not make the show with the express intent to undermine loki. bc the show wasn't just bad. it was actively malicious

the moment when you realize an ai would've written a better larry show than mike waldron bc an ai would've been trained on previous loki content and thus, unlike mike, would've actually watched the films