#old age pension scheme

[jantanow]

राकेश मिश्र अध्यक्ष और पुष्पेन्द्र कुमार बने महामंत्री

दिलीप कुमार बस्ती रिपोर्टर – दिनांक 07 अगस्त 2024 को ब्लाक संसाधन केन्द्र कप्तानगंज के सभागार में अटेवा की एक गोष्टी आयोजित हुई जिसमें राकेश कुमार मिश्र अटेवा के ब्लाक अध्यक्ष व पुष्पेन्द्र कुमार को कप्तानगंज ब्लाक का महामंत्री नामित किया गया । NPS का मतलब नो पेंशन स्कीम -तौआब अली जिला संयोजक अटेवा गोष्ठी में उपस्थित शिक्षक व शिक्षिकाओं को संबोधित करते हुए अटेवा के तेजतर्रार जिला संयोजक तौआब अली…

[townpostin]

Ex-MP Dr. Ajoy Kumar's Jankalyan Rath Benefits Over 1200 People in Jamshedpur

Dr. Ajoy Kumar’s initiative brings welfare schemes to the doorsteps of Jamshedpur residents, helping them access various government benefits. The Jankalyan Rath (vehicle) was launched by former MP and senior Congress leader Dr. Ajoy Kumar on July 9 at Baridih Chowk. The purpose of this initiative is to provide information about state government welfare schemes and help residents avail these…

[mariacallous]

Presidential advisor Elon Musk recently claimed on Joe Rogan’s podcast that Social Security is “the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time.” In fact, Social Security has been one of the most effective and enduring components of America’s social safety net. It has done more than almost anything else to alleviate the problem of poverty amongst the elderly. While the program has been far from perfect, Congress has continued to improve and strengthen its structure over time when reforms were warranted. The program has become a “third rail” in national politics because it is so central to the lives of families living in states both red and blue.

Until recently, President Donald Trump has known enough to stay away from this issue. He has avoided mentioning cuts to the program, most likely sensitive to the fact that doing so has very little appeal to most of the electorate, including with a lot of the voters who brought him into power.

But as with his drive to reshape the government workforce with a sledgehammer rather than a chisel, Musk might end up dragging the president into a political quagmire that will consume much of the administration’s energy. Threatening Social Security, which turns 90 this year, will do more than almost anything else to energize Democrats and deflate Republicans, who will perceive this to be a losing issue for their party.

President Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Democratic Congress created Social Security in 1935 at the height of the New Deal. The United States had yet not adopted the kind of federal social insurance programs for retirees that European nations had put into place decades earlier, like Germany (1889) and Denmark (1891). In 1934, the Committee on Economic Security, headed by Secretary of Labor Frances Perkins, proposed that Congress create a federal insurance program that would provide retirees with pensions financed through payroll taxes.

Crucially, the program would be universal, including all workers who whose jobs were covered rather than deciding who should receive benefits through a means test. The belief of the program’s founders was that within a nation historically ambivalent about federal programs, means tests stigmatized beneficiaries whereas universal benefits were not seen as handouts. Universal benefits also had the advantage of investing many different income classes in the continuation of the program, since everyone under the insurance umbrella would receive something down the line.

Additionally, Old-Age Insurance, as it was called, was seen as a more conservative alternative to flat monthly pensions, which some reformers were calling for, and which would be paid for by the federal government. As Roosevelt said: “We can never insure one hundred percent of the population against one hundred percent of the hazards and vicissitudes of life, but we have tried to frame a law which will give some measure of protection to the average citizen and to his family against the loss of a job and against poverty-ridden old age.”

The Social Security taxes were a key part of the legislation. First, the taxes offered a fiscally conservative method to pay for benefits that would not draw on general tax revenue. Congress would be forced to consider the long-term annual costs of the program to make certain that they did not have to raise taxes on workers. Initially, Congress also planned to accumulate a surplus of funds. Second, the payroll taxes would leave workers feeling invested in the program by giving them the sense that they were “paying into” a system and thus deserved benefits down the line. “With those taxes in there,” Roosevelt later said, “no damn politician can ever scrap my social security program.”

But it faced problems immediately.

Southern Democrats who controlled many major committees insisted that agricultural and domestic workers, two segments of the labor force with high levels of Black employment, were excluded. The South did not want them to be brought into a federal policy that easily could open the door to civil rights interventions. Women were also left out, as legislators envisioned a program for single wage-earning households, and at the time, those workers were assumed to be men. Finally, the notion of a surplus for the future was the most questionable part of the package since the money would not literally be saved in some kind of bank account for future use. In practice, the excess funds would be invested in government securities. (Collecting money that would not be used in the short term sit well at a time that workers were still struggling with the effects of the Great Depression.)

During its first five years in existence, the program was on politically shaky ground. While Congress did expand coverage in 1939 to include workers’ widows and dependents, political support for Old Age Insurance remained weak. A number of Republicans attacked Roosevelt’s measure. In 1936, Republican presidential candidate Alf Landon said the program was a “cruel hoax” that would create a massive bureaucracy; he believed there was “every probability that the cash they pay in will be used for current deficits and new extravagances.” Opponents in Congress tried to subvert the program by freezing payroll tax increases eight times, starting in 1939, and lobbying to finance benefits through general revenue, which would eliminate the politically valuable earmarked payroll taxes, and thus make Social Security subject to the vagaries of all other discretionary programs.

In 1950, with Democrat Harry Truman in the White House, his party saved the program. Congress increased Old Age Insurance, raised the taxes, and gradually expanded the kinds of jobs that were covered, starting with agricultural workers. Congress abandoned the idea of collecting a surplus so that benefits were paid for on a strict pay-as-you go basis. Today’s workers would pay for today’s retirees. In 1954, Republican President Dwight Eisenhower warned in a letter to his brother: “Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history.” The Social Security card that bore the individual number of every citizen became a point of pride. Though the Social Security number was originally created so that the government could record worker’s earnings for the program, it came to become one of the most common forms of identification.

For the next few decades Social Security grew steadily. When Republican candidate Barry Goldwater proposed making the program voluntary—thus undercutting its universal structure—in 1964, he was pilloried by President Lyndon Johnson, who used Goldwater’s proposition as one more piece of evidence that he was a radical conservative. In 1965, Congress added health care benefits—Medicare, which was also constructed as a universal benefit—into Social Security. It was one of Johnson’s greatest legislative victories. In 1972, Republicans and Democrats vied to increase benefits as Americans were struggling with inflation born out of spending on Vietnam. The partisan competition was over how to expand, not over whether to do so. President Richard Nixon and congressional Republicans pushed to index benefits to inflation so that there would be automatic cost-of-living adjustments when prices rose. Seeking to retain discretionary control over benefits, House Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Wilbur Mills, a Democrat, preferred the old-fashioned method of having Congress vote to raise the numbers (which also ensured they would receive credit). The final Social Security Amendments included both proposals. Benefits rose by a whopping 20 percent and the legislation indexed the program.

Since 1972, there have been a number of occasions when Congress has incrementally increased taxes and adjusted benefits based on actuarial predictions made by the Social Security Administration or bipartisan commissions. For instance, the Social Security Amendments of 1983 increased payroll taxes and delayed a cost-of-living adjustment to make the program solvent into the near future.

Republican efforts to directly cut Social Security benefits have never been successful. The program is too popular. When Reagan initially tried to address a fiscal shortfall in 1981, his Office of Management and Budget director, David Stockman, proposed significantly reducing benefits for early retirees. House Democrats pounced, with Speaker Tip O’Neill warning that this was the first step to destroying the program. Reagan backed away, giving rise to the notion that the program had become a “third rail” in American politics. In 2005, fresh from his reelection victory against Sen. John Kerry, President George W. Bush proposed a major plan that would privatize the system by allowing workers to invest some of their payroll taxes into investment accounts, thereby taking a risk as to where the account would be upon their retirement. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid handed the president a whopping defeat.

In 2008, more than 50 million people were receiving Social Security benefits. In 2025, approximately 69 million Americans will receive roughly $1.6 trillion in benefits. That includes almost nine of out 10 Americans 65 and older, for whom Social Security constitutes 31 percent of their income. Furthermore, 39 percent of men who are 65 and older and 44 percent of women that age receive at least 50 percent of their income from Social Security. According to the National Institute on Retirement Security, a stunning 87 percent of Americans believe that Social Security should remain a budgetary priority. That figure includes 86 percent of Republicans.

It is not a shock as to why many Americans have a sense of pride, as the founders of the program had predicted, in having paid into this system and equally believe that they are deserving of their monthly benefits.

Given the track record of Trump 2.0 thus far, there is no reason to believe that Musk is not serious about putting Social Security in the administration’s crosshairs. Indeed, the biggest threat right now to the efficiency of Social Security is Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency itself, as it drives a proposal to slash thousands of jobs from the Social Security Administration and has gained access to the payment system.

To be sure, the program must deal with the growing numbers of retirees and thinning population of workers. But Trump and Musk’s burn-down-the-house approach is dangerous to the elderly and a worse alternative to the kinds of incremental reforms (such as increasing the taxable maximum ceiling on wages and increasing payroll taxes) that have continued to correct imbalances in the program since the 1970s. For example, the Brookings Institution has put forward one comprehensive study that shows how solvency could be achieved while maintaining the integrity of the basic program.

Trump, who has kept him away from this battle until now, might find his partner Musk drawing him into something that even Trump can’t spin his way out of. At a time of growing job insecurity and rising prices, as well stagnant pension coverage, Roosevelt’s legacy is more important than ever before.

[mitigatedchaos]

Previously, I said that (Aug 2024)...

Unless someone can fix the relationship between the sexes (for the straights), the default outcome is that the right-wing impose a massive resource transfer from the single and childless to married women with children.

...and while this is not 100% guaranteed, it's entirely within the contemporary right-wing frame to propose that net taxpayers having children is "underpriced" by existing government welfare schemes and industrial society, with people paying to have and raise children but not being compensated for the effort except with delightful smiles and maybe not being sent to a care home in decrepit old age. (Or worse - people are claiming that the UK are floating a bill to privatize "assisted dying".)

Back then, I wrote...

...pension fund numbers "aren't morals." They don't have to build an agreement on exactly whose religion has the correct view of gender morality. They don't have to make any claims about LGBTs. All they have to say is, childless person = unfunded pension liability.

No kids? No pension. Well, that sorts out the balance of benefits real quick.

Most of you who are practiced in the art can probably see the problem with making payments to parents directly from their children's taxes, immediately - it incentivizes pushing the kids for maximum earnings.

That sounds like overkill that's going to result in a lot of 60-hour work weeks and family fights. Combine it with Gattaca-style IVF or similar technologies, and there might be a lot of pressure to avoid a "bad" kid, potentially leading to a flattening of humanity.

(An approach in which income for tax purposes is divided by the number of children would take a more agnostic stance on a child's future earnings, merely making the assumption that they're likely to fall within their parents' tax bracket. However, this would still shift the burden of taxation from those who are married with children, to the single and childless.)

To avoid this outcome, a cultural alternative that helps straight people learn to love one another again, among other interventions, should be developed.

Ideally, it should gain traction within 4-5 years, so that it can show gains before 2032 and thereby undermine the perceived legitimacy of a purely financial method.

[ukrfeminism]

Women would need to work for an extra 19 years to retire with the same pension savings as men, according to data from the Pensions Policy Institute.

The research found women retiring at 67 – the new UK state pension age from 2026 – will have saved an average of £69,000, compared with £205,000 for men.

The data, published by the PPI and pensions provider Now: Pensions, suggests that under the current system, in order to close the “gender pension gap” a girl would need to start saving at three years old to retire with the same amount of money as working men.

Career gaps, caring responsibilities, childcare costs and lower earnings all contribute to the disparity.

As automatic enrolment into workplace pensions – where workers are put into a pension scheme into which they and their employer pay – starts at the age of 22, the 19-year gap meant that “by age three, girls are already falling behind boys in their provision for later life”, the researchers claimed.

However, women often live longer than men – on average by about seven years – meaning their retirement pots also need to last longer.

Now: Pensions is calling for the £10,000-a-year earnings threshold for people to be automatically enrolled into a workplace pension to be removed because it excludes many women who hold multiple jobs or work part-time or as freelancers.

The UK state pension age of 66 is set to rise to 67 between 2026 and 2028. From 2044, it is expected to rise to 68. However, research issued earlier this week suggested it would have to rise to 71 for those born after April 1970.

Separate industry figures issued on Wednesday indicated that the estimated amount of money needed to enjoy a “moderate” standard of living in retirement had jumped by £8,000 – or 34% – in a year as a result of the cost of living crisis and changes in behaviour.

The Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association has developed the “retirement living standards” to show what life in retirement looks like at three different levels – minimum, moderate and comfortable. Last year it said a single person needed about £12,800 a year to meet the minimum threshold but this year the figure has been put at £14,400.

The new threshold for a moderate standard of living in later life is £31,300 for a single person – up from £23,300 a year ago. To meet the comfortable threshold, the new figure is £43,100 a year for one person – up from £37,300.

The pension provider Scottish Widows said securing a guaranteed annual income of £23,300 for life would require a pension pot of about £500,000 – but securing an income of £31,300 would mean amassing a pension pot of more than £750,000.

The PLSA said its latest research “reflects the price rises that households have faced, particularly in food and energy use”, but also highlighted the increasing importance people placed on spending time with family and friends away from the home, as people’s priorities have changed after the coronavirus pandemic.

[mwananchicreditbest]

Mwananchi Credit Highlights the Importance of Teaching Financial Literacy In Schools

How many times have we read numerous newspaper articles about children who squandered their inheritance money or how they trusted quick “get rich” schemes and was dubbed out of it? Again, how many times have we seen an employee who worked tirelessly for 30+ years and went on retirement, only to splurge away their pension pay-outs and suffer in their old age? Better yet, how many young people currently employed are living from paycheck to paycheck with debts overwhelming them, credit cards here, over-drafts there, revolving loans, the list is endless. The most common reason is that many heirs, pensioners or even the young workforce are simply inexperienced at handling money.

A million dollars can be put to so much good use. However, once it is spent recklessly, it can no longer produce income. Isn’t it amazing that we all completed high school knowing algebra, the scientific table, and the human anatomy, but not how to open a bank account, how to file a tax return, the importance of having funeral covers or even something as simple as budgeting and saving?

The current education system is slow to teach simple money management habits/techniques to children growing up. Most young people will graduate from universities or start new businesses with no financial foundation. As a society we lack basic financial literacy thus teaching financial literacy in schools is critical in passing on general wealth.

Financial attitudes and habits begin to mold at a very young age. It is extremely important to expose children to how to use money wisely and to smart financial decision making. School curriculum can range from budgeting and cash flows so that young people understand the concept of ‘money in, money out’ and how that will impact them in the long term.

Our young people need to know how loans work, how interests are charged on these loans and how it can impact their financial situation over the long run. Notwithstanding the above, the importance of retirement planning the power of putting a little bit of money away today and where that can land you in the future, are all critical. By teaching financial literacy in schools, we can change the narrative from poverty to debt-free lifestyle, from inheritance money being a “curse” to a gift.

Furthermore, we can pass on generational wealth by enabling our young people to make informed decisions. In this digital and social media era, we find that our young people take out a personal loans today just to finance a trip to Paris or California and only to realize that upon their return, they must start repaying this loan with a very high interest rate for four years. Just to take out another loan to offset that and find themselves in a pool of financial difficulty.

I know that many might argue that if you are a high school teenager, you most likely don’t have much money, you don’t have access to credit, you don’t have a job- so is there really any point in teaching such a youngster about savings, investing, taxes or budgeting? However, many of us were taught religious, moral education and life skills in school and that shaped us in many ways for life. We learned basic principles of respect, sharing, caring and discovering our identity. Another subject that was introduced in recent years was entrepreneurship because it uses developing real world skills that will help learners lead exceptional lives in a rapidly changing world by teaching children to think outside the box.

Many western countries have introduced Financial Literacy in their school curriculum examples of these countries are Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden just to name a few.

Our current school curriculum equips children how to be great doctors and individuals with great business skills. Since the children of today are going to be the leaders of tomorrow, financial literacy will equip them with the skills they will need to become financially literate adults. In the end their future and that of our country Kenya is depending on it.

Mwananchi credit is the leading Microfinance company in Kenya providing log book loans and other secured emergency loans, Mwananchi Credit is at the forefront in championing for financial literacy good finance planning for individuals and SMEs.

Welcome to Mwananchi credit, Investor in people

PLEASE CALL 0709 147 000  SMS:’’LOAN’’ TO 23877 OR DIAL *684#

Article by Gitonga Muriithi, Head of Commercial, Mwananchi Credit

[loathsomebrian]

Except that isn't how they work because again and again governments and corps sell or undermine pension schemes, so the poor have no protections come old age and the rich get richer. When I got old of I don't have a passive income from my publishing or _some other job_ I'll probably just kill myself. Which fucking sucks. Fuck, I'm one dibilitating illness away from that anyway. We're all fucked. Nothing fucking matters.

Pensions sound so fake as a zillennial. You work for one place for decades (already sounds fake) and then afterwards you leave and they just. keep paying you. the same amount of money. to do nothing. for the rest of your life. if i wasn't already aware that this was something that readily and commonly existed during my grandparent's days then it would sound like some kind of socialist pipe dream

[financialeducationsip]

SIP vs NPS: Which Investment Option is Better for You?

When it comes to long-term wealth creation and retirement planning, two popular investment options often stand out: SIP (Systematic Investment Plan) and NPS (National Pension System). While both are excellent choices depending on your financial goals, understanding their key differences can help you make a smart investment decision.

What is SIP?

SIP or Systematic Investment Plan is a disciplined way of investing in mutual funds. You invest a fixed amount regularly—monthly or quarterly—into a mutual fund scheme of your choice. It allows you to benefit from rupee cost averaging and compound interest over time.

Key Benefits of SIP:

Flexible investment amount and tenure

High liquidity (you can redeem anytime)

Suitable for wealth creation over the long term

Wide range of mutual fund schemes (equity, debt, hybrid)

What is NPS?

National Pension System (NPS) is a government-backed retirement savings scheme. It is designed to provide financial security during old age. Contributions to NPS are invested in a mix of equity, corporate bonds, and government securities.

Key Benefits of NPS:

Tax benefits under Section 80C and an additional ₹50,000 under 80CCD(1B)

Long-term retirement planning

Partial withdrawal allowed under specific conditions

Annuity income post-retirement

Which One Should You Choose?

Go for SIP if you are looking for flexible, high-return investment options with no long-term commitment.

Choose NPS if your primary goal is retirement savings and you want to enjoy tax benefits with disciplined investment.

For many investors, a combination of SIP and NPS works best—SIP for wealth accumulation and NPS for retirement security.

Conclusion

Both SIP and NPS have their own advantages. Your choice should depend on your financial goals, risk appetite, and investment horizon. For diversified financial planning, consider using both instruments wisely.

Start early, stay consistent, and invest smartly for a secure financial future!

[townpostin]

321 Pension Approval Certificates Distributed in Jamshedpur

Senior Citizen Pension Certificates Distributed at Baridih Assembly Office Under the directives of Jamshedpur East MLA Saryu Roy, 321 approval certificates for the Chief Minister’s State Old Age Pension Scheme were distributed at the Baridih Assembly office on Sunday. JAMSHEDPUR – On Sunday, 321 approval certificates for the Chief Minister’s State Old Age Pension Scheme were distributed at the…

[bharatclubone]

Unlock Freedom: Download the Bharat App Today!

In a fast-paced digital world, the power to stay connected, informed, and in control of your daily life is no longer a luxury—it’s a necessity. Enter Bharat App, the ultimate solution for seamless access to essential services, secure transactions, and real-time updates from the heart of India. Whether you're a student, a working professional, a business owner, or a senior citizen, Bharat App is built for YOU.

This isn’t just another app—it’s a movement. A movement toward digital empowerment, self-reliance, and freedom. So why wait? Unlock your digital freedom by downloading the Bharat App today.

What is the Bharat App?

Bharat App is a one-stop digital platform designed to bring together a range of public services and features in one easy-to-use mobile interface. From paying utility bills and checking government schemes to applying for documents and accessing emergency services, it’s all here—organized, secure, and just a tap away.

No more juggling between multiple apps or standing in long queues. Bharat App puts the power of governance and convenience right into your hands.

Why "Unlock Freedom"?

The term “freedom” isn’t used lightly. With Bharat App, you’re not just installing a utility—you’re claiming back your time, your privacy, and your control over information. Here’s how:

1. Freedom from Complexity

Government processes have traditionally been seen as complex and bureaucratic. Bharat App simplifies them with a user-friendly interface, multilingual support, and real-time guidance. You don’t need to be tech-savvy—just curious and ready to explore.

2. Freedom from Disconnection

Rural or urban, young or old—Bharat App bridges the digital divide. Designed to be lightweight and compatible with most smartphones, it brings digital governance to the fingertips of even the remotest users in India.

3. Freedom from Insecurity

Bharat App uses end-to-end encryption, multi-factor authentication, and secure cloud technology to ensure your data stays yours. Whether you're making payments or uploading personal documents, your privacy is protected.

4. Freedom to Access Everything in One Place

Why download ten different apps when one can do it all? Access Aadhaar services, PAN card applications, driving license info, ration card status, pension updates, and more—all in one place.

Key Features of Bharat App

Digital Identity Access: View and manage Aadhaar, PAN, Voter ID, and other identity documents.

Bill Payments: Pay electricity, water, gas, and mobile bills directly from the app.

Government Schemes: Get personalized recommendations for central and state-level schemes based on your profile.

E-Documents Vault: Securely store digital versions of your important documents.

Local Services: Book appointments at nearby government offices, check grievance statuses, and find emergency contacts.

Multilingual Support: Available in multiple Indian languages to cater to every citizen.

Made in India, Made for India

The Bharat App is more than a technological tool—it's a reflection of India’s vision for a self-reliant digital future. Developed in line with the Digital India mission, it focuses on inclusivity, accessibility, and transparency. Every feature is thoughtfully built keeping in mind the unique needs of Indian citizens across various regions and age groups.

How to Download the Bharat App

Ready to join the digital revolution? Here's how to get started:

Go to the Google Play Store or Apple App Store.

Search for “Bharat App – Digital India Services”.

Tap “Install” and wait for the download to complete.

Open the app, set up your profile, and start exploring.

It’s that simple.

Testimonials

"Bharat App helped me access a subsidy scheme I didn’t even know I was eligible for. Super convenient!" — Asha Kumari, Homemaker, Uttar Pradesh

"I use it daily to pay my bills and keep track of my pension. It’s safe and simple." — Rajiv Patel, Retired Officer, Gujarat

"I’m a college student and this app has made it easier to get certificates and apply for internships through government portals." — Naveen Rao, Student, Delhi

Final Thoughts

In today’s connected world, true freedom lies in having the tools to manage your life without barriers—digital or physical. The Bharat App isn’t just here to help; it’s here to transform. With its rich features, strong security, and India-first approach, it redefines what it means to be empowered.

So don’t wait for change. Be the change. Download the Bharat App today and unlock your freedom!

[techminsolutions]

Discover the LIC Smart Pension Plan – a game-changer for retirement planning! With just a one-time investment of ₹1 lakh, you can secure a lifetime monthly pension of ₹1000. Brought to you by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), a trusted public sector giant, this non-participating, non-linked, immediate annuity plan is designed for middle-class and everyday individuals dreaming of a secure retirement. In this video, we break down everything you need to know about this scheme: its key features, eligibility (ages 18-100), flexible annuity options (monthly, quarterly, half-yearly, or yearly), and how it ensures financial stability with single or joint-life benefits. Learn why LIC remains a leader in offering the best insurance and savings plans in India, and how this pension plan stands out with no upper investment limit and guaranteed returns. Whether you're planning for old age or seeking a reliable income source, this video explains it all – including what happens to your money after you’re gone. Watch now, like, subscribe, and hit the bell icon for more financial tips and updates on LIC schemes!

[sandeepk2]

Best Atal Pension Yojana (APY) Calculators Online: How to Use & Benefits Explained

Planning for retirement is crucial to ensuring financial security in old age. The Atal Pension Yojana (APY) Calculator is an essential tool for individuals looking to estimate their pension benefits and monthly contributions under the Atal Pension Yojana scheme. By using an APY calculator, users can make informed decisions about their savings and retirement planning.

What is the Atal Pension Yojana (APY)?

The Atal Pension Yojana (APY) is a government-backed social security scheme designed to provide a fixed pension to individuals after they reach the age of 60. The scheme is targeted primarily at workers in the unorganized sector, but anyone between 18 and 40 years can enroll. The pension amount ranges from ₹1,000 to ₹5,000 per month, depending on the contributions made.

What is an Atal Pension Yojana Calculator?

An Atal Pension Yojana Calculator is an online tool that helps users determine the monthly contribution required to receive a specified pension amount upon retirement. This tool simplifies financial planning and provides clarity on savings goals.

How the APY Scheme Calculator Works

Enter Your Age – The earlier you enroll, the lower your monthly contribution.

Select the Pension Amount – Choose a pension ranging from ₹1,000 to ₹5,000 per month.

Get Monthly Contribution Details – The calculator shows how much you need to contribute monthly.

Estimate Total Investment – The tool provides an overview of the total contributions required over the years.

Using a calculator for Atal Pension Yojana, individuals can plan their finances more effectively.

Benefits of Using an Atal Pension Scheme Calculator

1. Simplifies Retirement Planning

The APY calculator helps individuals determine how much they need to save for a secure retirement, making it easier to plan their finances.

2. Provides Accurate Estimates

Instead of relying on rough calculations, the Atal Pension Yojana scheme calculator provides precise contribution details based on official government data.

3. Easy and Free to Use

Most APY scheme calculators are available online for free on bank websites and government portals.

4. Helps in Comparing Contribution Plans

Users can compare different contribution amounts and choose the best plan that fits their financial capacity.

Where to Find the Best Atal Pension Yojana Calculators Online?

Several financial websites, government portals, and banking institutions provide reliable APY scheme calculators. Here are some of the best sources:

National Pension System (NPS) Portal – Offers an official APY calculator.

Leading Banks (SBI, HDFC, ICICI, PNB, etc.) – Provide APY calculators with user-friendly interfaces.

Government of India Pension Scheme Website – Features official contribution details.

Financial Planning Websites – Offer accurate estimates with additional retirement tips.

How to Use an APY Calculator Online?

Visit a reliable website that provides an Atal Pension Yojana scheme calculator.

Enter your age to check eligibility.

Select the pension amount you wish to receive after retirement.

Click ‘Calculate’ to get your estimated monthly contribution.

Analyze the result and adjust your contribution if needed.

Who Should Use an Atal Pension Yojana Calculator?

Self-employed individuals looking for a reliable retirement plan.

Salaried employees wanting additional financial security.

Workers in the unorganized sector seeking government-backed pension benefits.

Young professionals wanting to start early and secure a stable future.

FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)

1. What is the best Atal Pension Yojana Calculator available online?

The official APY calculator available on government and major bank websites provides the most accurate estimates.

2. Is using an APY calculator free?

Yes, all major financial institutions and government portals provide the Atal Pension Yojana calculator for free.

3. Can I change my pension amount later?

Yes, you can modify your pension amount once per year by adjusting your contributions.

4. Are contributions under APY tax-deductible?

Yes, contributions under the Atal Pension Yojana qualify for tax deductions under Section 80CCD(1b) of the Income Tax Act.

5. What happens if I miss a contribution?

Missed contributions may result in penalties, and repeated defaults can lead to the deactivation of the account.

Conclusion

The Atal Pension Yojana Calculator is a valuable tool for individuals looking to plan their retirement savings effectively. It provides clarity on contribution requirements and ensures financial preparedness for the future. By using a calculator for Atal Pension Yojana, individuals can make well-informed decisions and secure a stable income post-retirement.

Start using an APY calculator today to take charge of your retirement planning!

[scrumptiouskiddefendor]

Distribution of Historical Pensions  in Andhra Pradesh

Nara Chandrababu Naidu, the former Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, is known for his administrative acumen and innovative approach to governance. During his tenure, especially between 1995-2004 and 2014-2019, Naidu introduced several welfare schemes aimed at improving the lives of marginalized communities. One of the significant aspects of his governance was the distribution of pensions to vulnerable sections of society. His government expanded pension schemes to provide financial security to the elderly, widows, disabled, and other disadvantaged groups, setting a benchmark for welfare governance in the state.

Under Nara Chandrababu Naidu’s leadership, the distribution of pensions underwent significant reforms to ensure that benefits reached the intended beneficiaries. Recognizing the importance of social security, Naidu’s government focused on expanding the coverage and increasing the pension amounts to provide more substantial financial support. He introduced mechanisms to streamline the distribution process, minimize leakages, and ensure timely payments. One of the key reforms was the emphasis on technology-driven governance. Naidu’s administration utilized Information Technology (IT) solutions to improve transparency and efficiency in the pension disbursement process. The integration of digital platforms, biometric authentication, and direct bank transfers helped reduce corruption and ensure that pensions were delivered directly to the beneficiaries. During Naidu’s tenure, several pension schemes were introduced or expanded to cater to various vulnerable groups:

●             Old Age Pension Scheme: The old age pension scheme was a flagship welfare program that provided financial assistance to senior citizens who lacked other means of support. Naidu’s government increased the pension amount periodically to adjust for inflation, recognizing the rising cost of living and the needs of the elderly.

●             Widow Pension Scheme: This scheme targeted widows from economically weaker sections, providing them with a stable income source. Naidu’s administration ensured that widows from low-income households received timely financial assistance, helping them to manage daily expenses in the absence of other family support.

●             Disabled Pension Scheme: Aimed at individuals with disabilities, this scheme provides essential financial support to help beneficiaries meet their basic needs. Naidu’s focus on inclusivity ensured that persons with disabilities were recognized and supported through increased pension amounts and streamlined processes for application and disbursement.

●             Weaver Pension Scheme: Recognizing the declining traditional occupations, Naidu’s government introduced a pension scheme for aging weavers, a significant community in Andhra Pradesh. This pension helped weavers sustain their livelihood during old age, preserving the traditional art while providing financial security.

The pension distribution reforms under Naidu had a profound impact on the social welfare landscape of Andhra Pradesh. By expanding the coverage and increasing pension amounts, Nara Chandrababu Naidu's government,   with the help of other TDP MLAs, provided a critical safety net for millions of vulnerable individuals. The focus on technology and transparent governance set a precedent for future welfare programs in the state.

Nara Chandrababu Naidu’s initiatives helped lift many out of poverty, provided financial stability to elderly and disabled persons, and ensured that marginalized communities received the support they needed. The legacy of these reforms continues to influence pension distribution policies in Andhra Pradesh, highlighting the importance of innovative governance in achieving social welfare goals. Nara Chandrababu Naidu’s tenure marked a transformative period in the distribution of pensions in Andhra Pradesh. Through reforms, technology integration, and a commitment to social security, his administration significantly improved the lives of many vulnerable citizens. These efforts not only provided financial relief but also restored dignity and stability to countless households across the state. To know more about this scheme, follow the TDP Live Update website.

[10bmnews]

PM Shram Yogi Maan-dhan: Pension Scheme For Unorganised Workers - Check Eligibility, Benefits, And How to Apply

Last Updated:February 17, 2025, 15:04 IST It is a voluntary and contributory pension scheme, under which the subscriber would receive a minimum assured pension of Rs 3000/- per month after attaining the age of 60 years. The scheme is meant for old age protection and social security of Unorganised Workers. PM-SYM Scheme: Millions of workers across India work in an unorganized sector and don’t…

[anbuthalapathy]

Best NGOs in Chennai - Prajha Trust and its Social Activism

Chennai has many NGOs that serve social welfare causes, but Prajha Trust always makes its mark as a leading NGO in Chennai. Prajha Trust's efforts towards education, healthcare, women empowerment, environmental sustainability, and community development continuously strive to help deprived communities. It is because of the immense support that the city has received from these NGOs which makes it one of the most developed cities in the country.

Educating Underprivileged Children

Education is every person’s right. NGOs like Prajha Trust, which is known as one of the top educational NGOs in Chennai, do their best to ensure that every underprivileged child receives education. Sponsored tutoring classes, scholarship excel programmes, digital literacy classes, and career counselling workshops are a few of the programmes offered by the organisation. The students are provided with the skills and resources which help them to close the educational gap and change their future.

Ensuring Good and Affordable Health Care for Everybody

Healthcare has a direct impact on the growth of any society and how well it functions. Prajha Trust is one of the NGOs based in Chennai that addresses the healthcare needs of the population and provides free medical camps, health check-ups, and lectures on preventive healthcare. In addition, it has also provided maternal and child healthcare support for families who face difficulty meeting healthcare expenditure.

Social Programmes and Initiatives for Empowering Women

Along with healthcare, women empowerment is another area of focus and concern. Prajha Trust is among the few NGOs based in Chennai that helps women become independent through vocational training, self-defence classes, and financial education. To those who wish to start a sustainable livelihood, women are also offered skill development courses such as sewing, handicrafts, and entrepreneurship. Campaigns aimed at educating women about legal issues help them better understand the measures they need to take to protect themselves.

Prajha Trust and Greenery Preservation

With Prajha Trust, there is a constant effort towards maintaining environmental sustainability. Among the many NGOs in Chennai, Prajha Trust stands out as an example as they take charge of organising and sponsoring tree planting campaigns, waste disposal initiatives, and water preservation practices. Through their constant awareness programmes, they promote the notion of having a clean as well as green environment.

Disaster Relief and Rehabilitation

During a disaster or any emergency, Prajha Trust offers relief measures and rehabilitation services to attend to affected communities with emergency medical relief and aid. They are renowned for their long-term rehabilitation support programmes which assist families in safely rebuilding their lives after the disaster. As one of the distinguished NGOs in Chennai, they strive to provide food, clothing, medical aid, and other essential materials to those who need them the most.

Holistic Community Development

Prajha Trust emphasises sustainable community development through a combination of various strategies which include economic, legal, political, and socio-cultural. As one of the most prominent NGOs in Chennai, Prajha Trust has also developed and implemented old age pension schemes and empowerment programmes for the poor to support self-employment and poverty alleviation to create a self-sustaining community.

Conclusion

Alongside its strong commitment to education, healthcare, women empowerment, environmental care, and community development initiatives, Prajha Trust stands out as one of the Top  NGOs in Chennai , India. With these transformative initiatives, Prajha Trust aims to facilitate social equity. These profound changes have and will continue to impact many lives, making it easier for people to contribute towards genuine social change through support provided to Prajha Trust.