#olc air service

[olcshippingline]

Streamlining Global Trade: The Rise of Air Freight with OLC Shipping Line

In the intricate web of global commerce, the efficiency of freight transportation is paramount. As businesses expand their reach across borders, the demand for swift and reliable shipping solutions intensifies. Amidst this backdrop, air freight emerges as a beacon of speed and precision, catalyzing the movement of goods across continents. Among the vanguards of this industry stands OLC Shipping Line, a pioneering entity reshaping the landscape of air cargo logistics.

Harnessing Innovation for Seamless Operations

OLC Shipping Line epitomizes innovation in air freight logistics. Leveraging state-of-the-art technology and strategic partnerships, the company has revolutionized the traditional paradigms of cargo transportation. By integrating advanced tracking systems and real-time monitoring capabilities, OLC ensures end-to-end visibility and transparency, empowering clients with actionable insights into their supply chains.

Efficiency Redefined: Speed, Accuracy, and Reliability

In an era defined by the relentless pursuit of efficiency, OLC Shipping Line sets the gold standard in air freight operations. With a global network of hubs and distribution centers, coupled with a fleet of cutting-edge aircraft, the company orchestrates seamless cargo movements with unparalleled speed and precision. Whether it's perishable goods requiring expedited delivery or high-value merchandise demanding utmost security, OLC delivers with unwavering reliability, adhering to stringent timelines and quality standards.

Sustainability at the Core

In an age where environmental stewardship is non-negotiable, OLC Shipping Line remains steadfast in its commitment to sustainability. Embracing eco-friendly practices across its operations, the company endeavors to minimize carbon footprint and mitigate environmental impact. From optimizing flight routes to deploying energy-efficient technologies, every aspect of OLC's operations is imbued with a sense of environmental responsibility, ensuring a greener future for generations to come.

Empowering Global Trade

At its essence, OLC Shipping Line is a catalyst for global trade, facilitating the seamless exchange of goods and ideas across borders. By bridging continents and connecting markets, the company empowers businesses to expand their horizons and unlock new opportunities for growth. Whether it's facilitating cross-border e-commerce or enabling just-in-time inventory management, OLC's agile and responsive logistics solutions serve as the backbone of modern commerce, fostering prosperity and progress on a global scale.

Looking Ahead: Navigating the Future of Air Freight

As the dynamics of global trade continue to evolve, OLC Shipping Line remains at the forefront of innovation, poised to meet the challenges and opportunities of tomorrow. With a relentless focus on customer-centricity, operational excellence, and sustainability, the company is primed to shape the future of air freight, driving economic growth and prosperity in an increasingly interconnected world.

In conclusion, OLC Shipping Line epitomizes the epitome of excellence in air freight logistics. Through its unwavering commitment to innovation, efficiency, sustainability, and global connectivity, the company continues to redefine the boundaries of what's possible in the realm of cargo transportation. As businesses navigate the complexities of a rapidly changing world, OLC stands as a trusted partner, empowering them to reach new heights of success in the global marketplace.

Read More;

freight forwarding services

Custom clearance services

Export clearance services

[lettermen-of-the-usa-stuff]

Please join Lettermen of the USA 🇺🇸 on #SaluteSaturday to honor those who have served or currentlhy serving. Today we salute Lt Jeffrey L. Wishik who was awarded the Distinguished Service Cross for valor in 1968 in Vietnam while serving as an Infantry rifle platoon leader. LTC (Ret) Wishik’s Military Decorations include Distinguished Service Cross, Bronze Star, Purple Heart, Meritorious Service Medal w/ OLC, Air Medal w/ 18 numeral, Army Commendation Medal w/OLC, National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal w/ one silver star and one bronze star, Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon w/ Num 1, Vietnam Campaign Medal, Combat Infantryman’s Badge, Aviator Badge, Airborne Wings. Legion of Valor, Madison County Ala Hall Of Heroes 2002, Purple Heart Honor Roll 2002, Ancient Order of Saint Barbara, Thank you for your service! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 #LettermenUSA #salutesaturday (at Southside, Alabama) https://www.instagram.com/p/B_a0leChows/?igshid=u08u8sumqjyi

[courtneytincher]

Trump administration attempts to legally justify attack on Iran

As it has contemplated military action against Iran, the Trump administration has opened the door to virtually every legal authority it might use to justify an attack, from tying Iran to al-Qaida, to President Donald Trump’s assertion that it would not involve American ground troops and “wouldn’t last very long”.US Democrats, and some Republicans, have tried repeatedly to pin the administration down, including last week’s unsuccessful attempt to muster 60 Senate votes for an amendment requiring Mr Trump to ask Congress before launching any military engagement.When asked directly about legal justification, senior administration officials have offered undetailed assurances that any action would “consistent with our Constitution”, as Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said last month, or they deferred to lawyers.“I’m not a scholar in this area,” Brian Hook, Mr Pompeo’s special representative for Iran, recently told the House Armed Services Committee under persistent questioning.Concern about the possibility of US military action against Iran has grown since the administration cited new intelligence that Iran or its proxies were planning to attack US troops or American interests in the Middle East.The United States has also blamed Iran for attacks on oil tankers near the Strait of Hormuz. Most recently, Iran shot down a US drone it said – and the US denied – had crossed into its airspace.Mr Trump and Iranian leaders have traded insults following the US withdrawal from the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement and subsequent reimposition and escalation of sanctions, and Iran’s announcement that it was stepping up its uranium enrichment.Following President Hassan Rouhani’s assertion on Wednesday that Iran could enrich to “any amount we want” in the absence of a nuclear deal, Mr Trump warned him to “be careful with the threats ... they can come back to bite you like nobody has been bitten before”.Although Trump cancelled a US strike against Iran following the drone shoot-down, the administration has continued to lay the legal groundwork for a strike.Mr Pompeo, in both public and classified testimony, according to lawmakers, has said there are ties between Iran and al-Qaida.Such a relationship would seem to provide the foundation for military action against Iran under the 2001 congressional Authorisation for Use of Military Force (AUMF) against the perpetrators of the al-Qaida attacks that year.Such a determination has doubters even within the administration.Defence officials have taken unusual steps in recent weeks to distance themselves from Mr Pompeo’s assertion, amid fears that the administration may be driving towards a conflict that most Pentagon officials expect would be long, costly and detrimental to American interests in the region.In a statement, Commander Rebecca Rebarich, a Pentagon spokeswoman, said the department “does not believe 2001 AUMF can be used against Iran”.That position has been affirmed by the Pentagon’s top lawyer, Paul Ney Jr, according to officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to address internal deliberations.While Pentagon officials do not deny that al-Qaida has had ties to Tehran, those links are generally seen as limited and non-operational.Taking up Mr Hook’s suggestion to ask government lawyers about both the 2001 AUMF and a subsequent 2002 congressional resolution authorising the US invasion of Iraq, Armed Services Committee Chairman Eliot Engel wrote last week to Marik String, who became acting State Department legal adviser six weeks ago.Mr Engel asked for “any and all legal analysis” relating to whether either measure was “applicable to any actions that could be undertaken by the Executive Branch in or against the Islamic Republic of Iran”.A brief reply from the State Department’s legislative affairs bureau came three days later.“The administration has not, to date, interpreted either AUMF as authorising military force against Iran,” it said, “except as may be necessary to defend US or partner forces engaged in counter-terrorism operations or operations to establish a stable, democratic Iraq.”Democrats have interpreted that response as leaving the door open to administration assertions that such authorisation is justified in the future.“We’re very concerned the administration hasn’t categorically said Congress hasn’t authorised war with Iran,” a Democratic congressional aide said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss the concerns of lawmakers. “The AUMF has already been stretched.”Three successive administrations have cited the 2001 AUMF as a basis for fighting an array of militant groups across the Middle East, South and Central Asia, and Africa, as Congress has failed in repeated efforts to pass a new authorisation that would apply to military actions that seem far afield from those originally authorised.Moreover, the legal caveat referring to Iraq, the subject of the 2002 authorisation, appears to cast a wide net over any interference in US or partner forces operations in that country.The State Department did not respond to questions about the scope of its statement.The other legal authority available to the president, short of Congress’s approval under its constitutional authority to declare war, is the president’s own constitutional power as commander in chief of the armed forces, in charge of keeping the nation secure.Here, previous presidents and the current Justice Department have laid a broad foundation for action that Congress has done little to constrain.The only public statement the administration has made interpreting those powers was a 31 May 2018 opinion by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Council (OLC) on authority for the April 2018 US airstrikes against Syrian chemical weapons facilities.The strikes were legal, the OLC concluded, because “the President reasonably determined that this operation would further important national interests” and that “the anticipated nature, scope and duration of the operations were sufficiently limited that they did not amount to war in the constitutional sense and therefore did not require prior congressional approval”.The Justice Department OLC did not respond to requests for comment.The 2018 opinion, which drew substantially from an Obama-era justification for the 2011 air operations in Libya, put an attack against Iran squarely in the context of decades of US military operations, including Haiti, Bosnia, Kosovo, Libya and many others, conducted without authorisation from Congress.Citing previous definitions of the “national interest”, the Trump OLC opinion cited protection of US persons and property, assistance to allies, and the promotion of regional stability – all of which have been mentioned by the administration as US goals regarding Iran.The second test examined whether US troops would be directly involved in hostilities, noting that the Clinton administration OLC, in judging the Bosnia deployment, concluded that the size and duration of operations, and the deployment of ground troops, were key tests.In an interview last week with Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo, Mr Trump said that “If something should happen, we’re in a very strong position. It wouldn’t last very long, I can tell you that. It would not last very long”.“And I’m not talking about boots on the ground, I’m not talking we’re going to send a million soldiers. I’m just saying if something would happen, wouldn’t last very long.”Washington Post

from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines

As it has contemplated military action against Iran, the Trump administration has opened the door to virtually every legal authority it might use to justify an attack, from tying Iran to al-Qaida, to President Donald Trump’s assertion that it would not involve American ground troops and “wouldn’t last very long”.US Democrats, and some Republicans, have tried repeatedly to pin the administration down, including last week’s unsuccessful attempt to muster 60 Senate votes for an amendment requiring Mr Trump to ask Congress before launching any military engagement.When asked directly about legal justification, senior administration officials have offered undetailed assurances that any action would “consistent with our Constitution”, as Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said last month, or they deferred to lawyers.“I’m not a scholar in this area,” Brian Hook, Mr Pompeo’s special representative for Iran, recently told the House Armed Services Committee under persistent questioning.Concern about the possibility of US military action against Iran has grown since the administration cited new intelligence that Iran or its proxies were planning to attack US troops or American interests in the Middle East.The United States has also blamed Iran for attacks on oil tankers near the Strait of Hormuz. Most recently, Iran shot down a US drone it said – and the US denied – had crossed into its airspace.Mr Trump and Iranian leaders have traded insults following the US withdrawal from the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement and subsequent reimposition and escalation of sanctions, and Iran’s announcement that it was stepping up its uranium enrichment.Following President Hassan Rouhani’s assertion on Wednesday that Iran could enrich to “any amount we want” in the absence of a nuclear deal, Mr Trump warned him to “be careful with the threats ... they can come back to bite you like nobody has been bitten before”.Although Trump cancelled a US strike against Iran following the drone shoot-down, the administration has continued to lay the legal groundwork for a strike.Mr Pompeo, in both public and classified testimony, according to lawmakers, has said there are ties between Iran and al-Qaida.Such a relationship would seem to provide the foundation for military action against Iran under the 2001 congressional Authorisation for Use of Military Force (AUMF) against the perpetrators of the al-Qaida attacks that year.Such a determination has doubters even within the administration.Defence officials have taken unusual steps in recent weeks to distance themselves from Mr Pompeo’s assertion, amid fears that the administration may be driving towards a conflict that most Pentagon officials expect would be long, costly and detrimental to American interests in the region.In a statement, Commander Rebecca Rebarich, a Pentagon spokeswoman, said the department “does not believe 2001 AUMF can be used against Iran”.That position has been affirmed by the Pentagon’s top lawyer, Paul Ney Jr, according to officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to address internal deliberations.While Pentagon officials do not deny that al-Qaida has had ties to Tehran, those links are generally seen as limited and non-operational.Taking up Mr Hook’s suggestion to ask government lawyers about both the 2001 AUMF and a subsequent 2002 congressional resolution authorising the US invasion of Iraq, Armed Services Committee Chairman Eliot Engel wrote last week to Marik String, who became acting State Department legal adviser six weeks ago.Mr Engel asked for “any and all legal analysis” relating to whether either measure was “applicable to any actions that could be undertaken by the Executive Branch in or against the Islamic Republic of Iran”.A brief reply from the State Department’s legislative affairs bureau came three days later.“The administration has not, to date, interpreted either AUMF as authorising military force against Iran,” it said, “except as may be necessary to defend US or partner forces engaged in counter-terrorism operations or operations to establish a stable, democratic Iraq.”Democrats have interpreted that response as leaving the door open to administration assertions that such authorisation is justified in the future.“We’re very concerned the administration hasn’t categorically said Congress hasn’t authorised war with Iran,” a Democratic congressional aide said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss the concerns of lawmakers. “The AUMF has already been stretched.”Three successive administrations have cited the 2001 AUMF as a basis for fighting an array of militant groups across the Middle East, South and Central Asia, and Africa, as Congress has failed in repeated efforts to pass a new authorisation that would apply to military actions that seem far afield from those originally authorised.Moreover, the legal caveat referring to Iraq, the subject of the 2002 authorisation, appears to cast a wide net over any interference in US or partner forces operations in that country.The State Department did not respond to questions about the scope of its statement.The other legal authority available to the president, short of Congress’s approval under its constitutional authority to declare war, is the president’s own constitutional power as commander in chief of the armed forces, in charge of keeping the nation secure.Here, previous presidents and the current Justice Department have laid a broad foundation for action that Congress has done little to constrain.The only public statement the administration has made interpreting those powers was a 31 May 2018 opinion by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Council (OLC) on authority for the April 2018 US airstrikes against Syrian chemical weapons facilities.The strikes were legal, the OLC concluded, because “the President reasonably determined that this operation would further important national interests” and that “the anticipated nature, scope and duration of the operations were sufficiently limited that they did not amount to war in the constitutional sense and therefore did not require prior congressional approval”.The Justice Department OLC did not respond to requests for comment.The 2018 opinion, which drew substantially from an Obama-era justification for the 2011 air operations in Libya, put an attack against Iran squarely in the context of decades of US military operations, including Haiti, Bosnia, Kosovo, Libya and many others, conducted without authorisation from Congress.Citing previous definitions of the “national interest”, the Trump OLC opinion cited protection of US persons and property, assistance to allies, and the promotion of regional stability – all of which have been mentioned by the administration as US goals regarding Iran.The second test examined whether US troops would be directly involved in hostilities, noting that the Clinton administration OLC, in judging the Bosnia deployment, concluded that the size and duration of operations, and the deployment of ground troops, were key tests.In an interview last week with Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo, Mr Trump said that “If something should happen, we’re in a very strong position. It wouldn’t last very long, I can tell you that. It would not last very long”.“And I’m not talking about boots on the ground, I’m not talking we’re going to send a million soldiers. I’m just saying if something would happen, wouldn’t last very long.”Washington Post

July 04, 2019 at 09:26AM via IFTTT

[gyrlversion]

Pentagon identifies two soldiers killed in Afghanistan

The Pentagon has identified the two soldiers killed in a firefight on Tuesday in Afghanistan as Master Sgt. Micheal B. Riley, 32, from Heilbronn, Germany, and Sgt. James G. Johnston, 24, from Trumansburg, New York.

Both soldiers died from wounds they sustained from small arms fire during a Taliban attack in Uruzgan Province, Afghanistan. the Pentagon said.

Few details have been made available about the incident, which is under investigation.

Their deaths are the 10th and 11th U.S. fatalities in Afghanistan this year, nine of them from hostile fire. There are still about 14,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan advising and assisting Afghanistan’s security forces in their fight against the Taliban and an ISIS affiliate in eastern Afghanistan.

For much of this year the United States and Taliban representatives have been engaged in peace talks in Qatar, the next round of talks will begin next week.

During a visit to Afghanistan this week, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo expressed hope that a draft agreement could be reached by September that, among other things, could lead to the removal of American troops from Afghanistan. However, a major sticking point has been that Afghanistan’s government has not participated in the talks, with the Taliban refusing to negotiate with Afghan leaders.

US Army

Master Sgt. Micheal B. Riley, a Special Forces communications sergeant, assigned to 10th Special Forces Group (Airborne), died on June 25, 2019, while engaged in combat operations.

Master Sgt. Micheal B. Riley, a Green Beret serving as a communications sergeant, was assigned to 10th Special Forces Group (Airborne). He was serving on his sixth deployment to Afghanistan.

Riley joined the Army in March, 2006 and after completing basic combat training and airborne school, was assigned to the 112th Special Operations Command Europe Signal Detachment. He completed the Special Forces Qualification Course in 2012 and was assigned to 10th Special Forces Group (A). .

Sgt. James Gregory Johnston, 24, from Trumansburg, New York, was assigned to 79th Ordnance Battalion (Explosive Ordnance Disposal), 71st Ordnance Group.

“Mike was an experienced Special Forces noncommissioned officer and the veteran of five previous deployments to Afghanistan,” Col. Lawrence G. Ferguson, the commander of 10th SFG (A) said in a statement. “We will honor his service and sacrifice as we remain steadfast in our commitment to our mission.”

His awards and decorations include the Bronze Star Medal, Meritorious Service Medal, Army Commendation Medal with four Oak Leaf Clusters (4 OLC), Army Achievement Medal, Joint Meritorious Unit Award (OLC), Army Good Conduct Medal (3), National Defense Service Medal, Afghanistan Campaign Medal with three Campaign Stars, Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon (3), Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon (2), NATO Medal, Special Forces Tab, Ranger Tab, Combat Infantryman Badge, Military Freefall Parachutist Badge, Parachutist Badge, Air Assault Badge, Driver and Mechanic Badge, and Marine Qualification Badge Expert-Rifle.

US Army

Sgt. James G. Johnston, explosive ordnance disposal specialist, 79th Ordnance Battalion (Explosive Ordnance Disposal) is shown in this undated photo.

Sgt. James Gregory Johnston, 24, from Trumansburg, New York, was assigned to 79th Ordnance Battalion (Explosive Ordnance Disposal), 71st Ordnance Group. He was on his first deployment to Afghanistan, arriving in March.

“It is with a heavy heart that we mourn the passing of Sergeant James Johnston,” said Lt. Col. Stacy M. Enyeart, commander of 79th Ordnance Battalion (Explosive Ordnance Disposal). “He was the epitome of what we as Soldiers all aspire to be: intelligent, trained, always ready. We will honor his service and his sacrifice to this nation as we continue to protect others from explosive hazards around the world,”

Johnston entered active-duty military service in July 2013 as an explosive ordnance disposal specialist.

Johnston’s awards and decorations include a Bronze Star Medal, Purple Heart, Army Commendation Medal, Army Achievement Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Afghanistan Campaign Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Korea Defense Service Medal, Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon, Combat Action Badge, Senior Explosive Ordnance Disposal Badge and Explosive Ordnance Badge.

The post Pentagon identifies two soldiers killed in Afghanistan appeared first on Gyrlversion.

from WordPress http://www.gyrlversion.net/pentagon-identifies-two-soldiers-killed-in-afghanistan/

[thewebofslime]

MARCH 9, 2019 HOME DECLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS CASE FILES MESSAGE FORUMS CONTACT Home Government History Intelligence Military / Defense Science The Fringe Wartime Forums FOIA & MDR Case Logs 17 February, 2019 / in Freedom of Information Act / Research Tools Background The Freedom of Information Act allows any requester to get as FOIA case logs. Below, you will find a list of all FOIA requests and Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) requests made by the public to various agencies. These are very useful to see who is requesting wDISAhat and can be very useful for ideas!NS FOIA Case Log Memorandums DoD Memorandum on FOIA Case Logs (10 July 2008) Declassified FOIA Case Logs Air Combat Command (ACC) 2012 [100 Pages] Army 2013 [1088 Pages, 7.91mb] 2012 2010-2016 MDR Log FY 2008 FY 2007OS FY 2006 Army / Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) 2014 [18 Pages, 1.1MB] 2010-2011 [46 Pages, 8.61MB] FY 2008 [21 Pages, 4.1MB] 2009 [17 Pages, 4.71MB] Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 2010-2011 [30 Pages, 90kb] Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) FOIA Case Logs FY 2016 FY 2015 FY 2008nat Oldest Pending FOIA Requests 5 Oldest FOIA Requests and Notes – as of June 2016 [381 Pages, 19.5MB] Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) 2013 [6 Pages, 0.3MB] Bureau of Prisons (BOP) CY 2007-03/28/2013 [976 Pages, 1.72MB] – Unfortunately, this FOIA Case Log did not have the topic of the requests, but is archived here for reference. Center for Disease Control (CDC) 2010-2013 [170 Pages, 6.5MB] 2009 [66 Pages, 12.8MB] 2008 [71 Pages, 12.4MB] Central Command (CENTCOM) 2010-2011 [390 Pages, 3.1MB] 2008 [71 Pages, 12.4MB] Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) FOIA Case Logs 2017 [87 Pages, 52.2MB] October – December 2016 [21 Pages, 4.7MB] 2015 [103 Pages, 63.4MB] 2014 [96 Pages, 4.5MB] 2013 [156 Pages, 14.06MB] 2012 [39 Pages, 4.24MB] 2011 [78 Pages, 9.51MB] 1986 [82 Pages, 7.7MB] Mandatory Declassification Review Logs 2017 [12 Pages, 6.8MB] 2013-2015 [32 Pages, 1.2MB] July – December 2012 [5 Pages, 1.2MB] Coast Guard (USCG) August 27, 2011 – December 31, 2013 [355 Pages, 2.61MB] Comptroller of the Currency, Administrator of National Banks 2006 [110 Pages, 15.07mb] Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency 2008-2013 [13 Pages, 2.65MB] U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) FOIA Case Logs 2016 [1,779 Pages, 4.0MB] Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) 2016 [8 Pages, 150KB] 2015 [8 Pages, 150KB] 2014 [8 Pages, 200KB] 2013 [10 Pages, 130KB] 2012 [9 Pages, 130KB] 2010-2011 [35 Pages, 350KB] Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) 2013 [6 Pages, 176KB] 2012 [13 Pages, 161KB] 2010-2011 [192 Pages, 0.9MB] Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) 2013 [5 Pages, 0.3MB] 2012 [11 Pages, 0.6MB] 2010-2011 [15 Pages, 1.14MB] Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) FOIA Case Logs 2016 [72 Pages, 3.6MB] 2013 [10 Pages, 0.1MB] 2012 [11 Pages, 0.1MB] 2011 [12 Pages, 0.1MB] 2010 [47 Pages, 0.15MB] 2009 [29 Pages, 4.1MB] 2008 [36 Pages, 9.5MB] 2003 – 2007 [118 Pages] Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Logs 2013-2015 [2 Pages, 0.7MB] Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) FOIA Case Logs 2017 [87 Pages, 2.3MB] 2014-2016 [209 Pages, 52.7 MB] 2013 [39 Pages, 5.9 MB] 2012 [32 Pages, 5.40 MB] 2010-2011 [74 Pages, 12.2 MB] 2009 – 5 Oldest FOIA Requests [117 Pages, 11.8MB] – This FOIA request for a copy of the top 5 OLDEST FOIA Requests, took nearly 8 years to process. 2001-2009 [299 Pages, 91.67 MB] FOIA Appeal Logs 2014-2015 [7 Pages, 1.9 MB] Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) 2016 [226 Pages, 1.1 MB] 2014 [287 Pages, 1.31 MB] 2013 [492 Pages, 1.31 MB] 2012 [392 Pages, 78.5 MB] 2010 – 2011 [21 Pages, 3 MB] Defense Security Service (DSS) 2014 [37 Pages,0.3 MB] 2013 [23 Pages, 2.24 MB] Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) Appeal Log, 01/01/2009 – 10/31/2016 [5 Pages, 3.4MB] 2001 – 2006 [10 Pages, 1MB] Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) 2017 [11 Pages, 0.5MB] 2016 [.xlsx File, 22kb] 2013 [.xlsx File, 22kb] 2012 [5 Pages, 2.2MB] 2011 [3 Pages, 20kb] 2010 [3 Pages, 30kb] Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) FOIA Case Logs 2016 [14 Pages, 3.7MB] 2013 [CSV File, 0.1MB] 2012 [6 Pages, 0.6MB] Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Logs 2013-2015 [29 Pages, 0.7MB] Department of Agriculture (USDA) FOIA Case Logs CY 2016 [25 Pages, 3.5MB] FY 2013 [67 Pages, 0.7MB] FY 2009 FY 2008 [172 Pages, 0.9MB] FY 2006-2007 [31 Pages, 18MB] FOIA Appeal Logs FOIA Appeals Log, 01/01/2009-11/10/2016 [7 Pages, 0.5MB] Department of Agriculture (USDA) / Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) FOIA Appeals Log, 01/01/2009-10/31/2016 [4 Pages, 0.5MB] Department of the Air Force (USAF) FOIA Case Logs February 1999 [100 Pages] 2008 [4 Pages, 450k] Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Logs 2016 [29 Pages, 0.7MB] 2013-2015 [29 Pages, 0.7MB] Department of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) 2008 [24 Pages, 4.11mb] Department of the Air Force Retirement Home (AFRH) 2010-2012 [5 Pages, 4.11mb] Department of Commerce FY 2013 [42 Pages, 0.7MB] 2011 – September 2012 [51 Pages, 12.5MB] Department of Commerce – International Trade Administration 7/1/2010 – 9/30/2010 [21 Pages, 1.7MB] Department of Defense (DOD) / Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) 5 Oldest FOIA Requests, as of February of 2014 [11 Pages, 1.5MB] FY 2012 [73 Pages, 872k] FY 2011 [115 Pages, 0.6mb] FY 2010 [99 Pages, 2.0mb] FY 2009 [236 Pages, 2.3mb] FY 2008 [172 Pages, 922k] FY 2007 [158 Pages, 3.36mb] FY 2006 [148 Pages, 977k] FY 2005 [112 pages, 2.07mb] FY 2004 [146 Pages, 469k] FY 2003 [136 Pages, 449k] FY 2002 [108 Pages, 364k] FY 2001 [109 Pages, 374k] FY 2000 [57 Pages, 228k] Department of Defense / Inspector General (DoD/IG) FOIA Case Logs 2016 [43 Pages, 1.2MB] 2012-2015 [147 Pages, 8.2MB] 2010-2011 [112 Pages, 0.55MB] FOIA Appeals Logs 2012-2015 [11 Pages, 0.7MB] Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Logs MDR Log of all DOD/IG MDR cases through November 9, 2016 [4 Pages, 0.6MB] Department of Education 5 Oldest FOIA Requests and Appeals (as of December 2016) [113 Pages, 15.5MB] Department of Energy (DOE) FOIA Case Logs 2016 [153 Pages, 3.4MB] 2013 [112 Pages, 1.22MB] 2010 [101 Pages, 13.71MB] 2009 [112 Pages, 922k] FOIA Appeals Logs Appeal Log, 01/01/2009-11/1/2016 [12 Pages, 0.6MB] Department of Homeland Security (DHS) / Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) FOIA Case Logs 2014-2016 (.ZIP file of Excel Spreadsheets) [10.1MB] Department of Homeland Security (DHS) / Office of the Inspector General (OIG) FY2010-2011 [198 Pages, 1.53mb] 2009 (October – December) [32 Pages, 0.2mb] FY 2009 [115 Pages, 2.6mb] 2008 [18 Pages, 8.57mb] FY 2007 (07-23-2007 through 11-30-2007) [47 Pages, 160kb] FY 2007 (10-02-2006 through 07-23-2007) [47 Pages, 160kb] FY 2006 (10-03-2005 through 09-26-2006) [47 Pages, 160kb] Department of Homeland Security (DHS) / Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) 2011-2016 [36 Pages, 0.9MB] Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) 2009-2010 [409 Pages, 43.7MB] 2008 [175 Pages, 22.5MB] Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) / Office of the Inspector General October 2010 – May 2016 [114 Pages, 23.2MB] Department of State FOIA Case Logs 2013-2014 [857 Pages, 9.9MB] 2005-2013 [2,538 Pages, 49.2MB] FOIA Appeal Logs 2014-2015 [30 Pages, 3.3MB] Department of State / Office of the Inspector General (STATE/OIG) FOIA Case Logs 2010-2016 [24 Pages, 1.2MB] Department of the Interior (DOI) 2016 [154 Pages, 10.7MB] 2012 [19 Pages, 3.32MB] 2010-2011 [19 Pages, 352kb] 2007-2009 [19 Pages, 3.0MB] Department of the Interior / Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (DOI/BOEM) FOIA Case Logs 2016 [12 Pages, 0.6MB] Department of the Interior / Bureau of Indian Affairs (DOI/BIA) FOIA Case Logs 2016 [154 Pages, 8.5KB] Department of the Interior / Fish & Wildlife Service (DOI/FWS) FOIA Case Logs 2016 [136 Pages, 1.7MB] Department of the Interior / Inspector General (DOI/IG) FOIA Case Logs 2016 [19 Pages, 0.7MB] 2013 [8 Pages, 260KB] Department of the Interior, Office of the Secretary (DOI/OS) FOIA Case Logs FY2007-2016 [376 Pages, 1.2MB] Department of the Interior, United States Geological Survey (DOI/USGS) FOIA Case Logs 2016 [0.1 MB] Department of the Justice / Office of Information Policy (DOJ/OIP) FOIA Case Logs 2010-2012 [250 Pages, 5.88MB] Department of Justice / Office of Legal Counsel (DOJ/OLC) 01/01/2006-03/24/2016 [140 Pages, 9.9MB] Office of Labor (DOL) 2016 [388 Pages, 7.2MB] Department of the Navy CY 2017 [220 Pages, 9.5MB] FY 2013 [129 Pages, 0.5MB] 2012 [275 Pages, 2.6MB] Department of the Navy / Marine Corps 2016 [33 Pages, 2.1MB] 2013 [81 Pages, 1.7MB] 2012 [31 Pages, 412kb] 2010-2011 [58 Pages, 412kb] Department of Transportation (DOT) FOIA Case Logs 2013-2015 [16 Pages, 9.5MB] 2007-2012 [165 Pages, 1.2MB] Mandatory Declassification Review Logs 2013-2015 [1 Page, 0.7MB] – No MDR’s during these dates. Department of Transportation (DOT) / Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) FOIA Case Logs 2016 [94 Pages, 1.2MB] Department of Transportation / Office of the Inspector General FOIA Case Logs 2016 [9 Pages, 0.5MB] Department of Transportation / Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) FOIA Case Logs 2014-2016 [31 Pages, 0.9MB] FOIA Appeal Logs Appeal Log, 01/01/2009-10/31/2016 [1 Page, 0.5MB] Department of the Treasury FOIA Case Logs 2007-2016 [585 Pages, 5.8MB] Department of the Treasury, Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) FOIA Case Logs 2016 [15 Pages, 2.5MB] 2013 [16 Pages, 3.85MB] 2012 [16 Pages, 3.85MB] 2009 [47 Pages, 9.3MB] FOIA Appeal Logs 2000-2016 [34 Pages, 4.9MB] Department of the Treasury, United States Mint FOIA Case Logs 2016 [9 Pages, 2.4MB] 2012 [16 Pages, 3.5MB] FOIA Appeal Logs 2009-2016 [1 Page, 0.6MB] Director of National Intelligence (DNI) FOIA Case Logs 2013 [27 Pages, 1.51MB] 2012 [27 Pages, 9.45MB] 2010-2011 [47 Pages, 2.21MB] 2008 [21 Pages, 439k] FOIA Appeal Logs 2014-2015 – [7 Pages, 1.5MB] 2000-2013 [13 Pages, 1.9MB] Dugway Proving Ground (DPG) 2010-2015 [7 Pages, 1.51MB] – This is how the document was received. Can the font get ANY smaller? (The PDF is zoomable) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) FOIA Case Logs EPA Claims on January 25, 2017, they no longer generate FOIA Case Logs, and they need to be generated at FOIAOnline. Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Logs Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Procedure [2 Pages, 0.4MB] 2014-2015 [5 Pages, 0.5MB] European Command (EUCOM) 2013 [11 Pages, 1.63MB] 2010-2011 [5 Pages, 2.73MB]- Document was in poor condition. Is readable, but needs to be zoomed in. This is the state they sent it to me electronically. Executive Office of the President (EOP) 2009 [24 Pages, 10.46MB] Executive Office of the President – Council on Environmental Quality (EOP/CEQ) FOIA Case Logs 2013-2016 [21 Pages, 1.5MB] Executive Office of the President – Office of National Drug Control Policy FOIA Appeal Logs 2009-2016 [3 Pages, 0.5MB] Executive Office of the President – Office of Science and Technology Policy (EOP/OSTP) FOIA Case Logs 2013 [9 Pages, 1.39MB] 2010-2011 [13 Pages, 1.6MB] 2009 [8 Pages, 1.5MB] Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) FOIA Case Logs 2014 [775 Pages, 59.2MB] 2013 [683 Pages, 176MB] 2010-2011 [830 Pages, 127MB] FOIA Appeal Logs 2017 – FOIA Appeals Log [9 Pages, 4.2MB] 2014-2015 – FOIA Appeals Log [20 Pages, 13.7MB] Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Logs 2013-2015 [6 Pages, 2MB] 2017 [2 Pages, 2MB] Oldest FOIA Cases 5 Oldest FOIA Requests/Appeals a/o 7/21/2015 [21 Pages, 8.2 MB] Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 2013 [86 Pages, 0.6MB] 2012 [83 Pages, 6.74MB] 2010-2011 [174 Pages, 16.2MB] 2009 [94 Pages, 2.5MB] Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 10 Oldest FOIA Cases with Processing Notes, a/o June 24, 2016 [624 Pages, 81.7MB] FOIA Case Logs 2012-2016 [636 Pages, 61.4MB] 2011 [27 Pages, 0.3MB] 2010 [130 Pages, 1.1MB] 2008 [76 Pages, 1.2MB] Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) FOIA Case Logs 2016 [17 Pages, 0.9MB] Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Appeal Log, 2009-10/3/2016 [19 Pages, 0.6MB] Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers (FLETC) FOIA Case Logs 2009-2016 [54 Pages, 2.1MB] Federal Reserve Board (FRB) 2014 [52 Pages, 0.6MB] Federal Trade Commission (FTC) 2013-2015 [26 Pages, 2.4MB] 2010-2012 [53 Pages, 0.3MB] Government Accountability Office (GAO) 2010-2013 [35 Pages, 0.9MB] Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) 2010-2016 [42 Pages, 0.9MB] Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) FOIA Case Logs 2010-2016 [43 Page, 12.2MB] FOIA Appeal Logs 2009-2016 [1 Page, 0.4MB] Internal Revenue Service (IRS) FOIA Case Logs 2017 [357 Pages, 1.7MB] 2016 [476 Pages, 2.0MB] 2010-2015 [2,118 Pages, 6.2MB] Joint Personnel Recovery Agency (JPRA) FOIA Case Logs 2016 [5 Pages, 0.7MB] Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) 2012-2016 [14 Pages, 0.6MB] National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) FY 2017 [48 Pages, 21.2MB] (Includes MDR Log and Appeals Log) FY 2016 [20 Pages, 0.9MB] FY 2015 [31 Pages, 13.9MB] FY 2014 [22 Pages, 0.6MB] FY 2013 [33 Pages, 13.44MB] FY 2012 [38 Pages, 15.7MB] FY 2010-2011 [140 Pages, 29 MB] FY 2009 [11 Pages, 650KB] FY 2008 [45 Pages, 6.14MB] FY 2007 [41 Pages, 5.39MB] FY 2006 [42 Pages, 5.9MB] National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) / Glenn Research Center (GRC) 2009 [9 Pages, 1.5MB] National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) 2012 [13 Pages, 124KB] 2010-2011 [25 Pages, 243KB] National Credit Union Administration(NCUA) APPEAL Log – 2009-10/2016 [3 Pages, 0.2MB] National Endownment for the Arts (NEA) FY 2013 [3 Pages, 0.2MB] 2009 [7 Pages, 0.2MB] 2006-2008 [7 Pages, 0.2MB] National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) FOIA Case Logs 2016 [15 Pages, 4.5MB] Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Logs All Dates through November 2016 – MDR Log [20 Pages, 1.1MB] National Guard Bureau FOIA Case Logs 2016 [8 Pages, 2.5MB] National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) FOIA Case Logs 2005-2016 [1,124 Pages, 29.7MB] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 2013 [6 Pages, 1.4MB] 2012 [6 Pages, 1.4MB] 2011 [14 Pages, 1.9MB] 2010 [12 Pages, 2.5MB] 2009 [4 Pages, 0.2MB] National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) 2013 [27 Pages, 0.2MB] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) 2010-2011 [21 Pages, 1.2MB] 2009 [25 Pages, 0.2MB] 2008 [23 Pages, 8.11MB] 2006 and 2007 Weekly Reports [144 Pages, 18.26mb] National Park Service (NPS) FOIA Case Logs 2014-2016 [195 Pages, 1.5MB] 2009-2013 [34 Pages, 6.38MB] 2008 [34 Pages, 6MB] National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) FOIA Case Logs 2016 [13 Pages, 2.1MB] 2013 [3 Pages, 1.55MB] 2010-2011 [13 Pages, 1.2MB] 2009 [28 Pages, 2.5MB] 5 Oldest FOIA Requests, as of June 2009 [130 Pages, 2.97MB] Mandatory Declassification Review Logs 2013-2015 [3 Pages, 1.0MB] – Requires zooming! Yes, that is how small they sent it to me. 2000-2012 [7 Pages, 8.2MB] FOIA Internal Status Reports 2015-2016 [115 Pages, 6.9MB] National Security Agency (NSA) FOIA Case Logs CY 2016 [100 Pages, 17.2MB] CY 2014 [232 Pages, 8.9MB] CY 2013 [315 Pages, 8.1MB] CY 2012 [60 Pages, 8.5MB] CY 2009 [70 Pages, 40MB] January 1 – January 30, 1998 [3 Pages, 500k] FOIA Appeal Logs CY 2014-2015 [60 Pages, 6.9MB] Oldest FOIA Requests Filed for 5 Oldest FOIA Requests 27 August 2009 [495 Pages, 67.6MB] – This request took nearly 8 years to get a response and has requests going back to 1994 as still being processed! Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Logs CY 2013-2015 [32 Pages, 4.2MB] National Telecommunications & Information Administration 2010-2011 [40 Pages, 6.5MB] Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) 2012 [21 Pages, 2.86MB] 2010-2011 [42 Pages, 5.2MB] 2009 [20 Pages, 5.59MB] New York State Office of the Attorney General (NYSO/AG) 2015-2016 [284 Pages, 63.9MB] Northern Command (NORTHCOM) FY 2016 [18 Pages, 12.8MB] FY 2013 [8 Pages, 0.3MB] FY2012 [8 Pages, 1.9MB] FY2010-2011 [9 Pages, 0.5MB] Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 02/2016-12/2016 [120 Pages, 3.4MB] 2012 [26 Pages, 5.67MB] 2009 [16 Pages, 0.2MB] FY 2006 [53 Pages, 4.71MB] Office of Government Ethics (OGE) 2010-2015 – FOIA Logs and Appeal Logs [67 Pages, 3.3MB] 2013 [16 Pages, 2.69MB] 2012 [15 Pages, 0.9MB] 2010-2011 [18 Pages, 1.7MB] 2009 [10 Pages, 1.7MB] FY 2006 – 2008 [14 Pages, 2.38MB] Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) 2010-2012 [12 Pages, 1.04MB] Office of Nuclear and National Security Information (ONNSI) Weekly Report from January – October 2001 [245 Pages, 22.17MB] Office of Special Counsel (OSC) FY2016 [6 Pages, 0.8MB] Appeal Log, FY2006-FY2016 [1 Page, 0.9MB] FOIA Backlog Reduction Goals, 2016-2017 [4 Pages, 1.4MB] FOIA Case Logs, FY2008-2015 [43 Pages, 1.6MB] Office of the Secretary of Defense and Joint Staff (OSD/JS) FOIA Case Logs 2017 [146 Pages, 1.9MB] 2016 [275 Pages, 1.7MB] 2014-2015 [332 Pages, 2.7MB] 2009 – 2013 [629 Pages, 3.34MB] 2000 – 2008 [1,146 Pages, 5.5MB] FOIA Internal Status Reports 2015-2016 [475 Pages, 49.6MB] – PDF Has bookmarks of the three attachments that were received for this FOIA. I combined them for ease of downloading/reading. Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Logs CY 2013-2015 [624 Pages, 5.1MB] Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) FOIA Appeal Logs 2011-2016 [2 Pages, 2.7MB] Offutt Air Force Base (SAC HQ) 2013 [5 Pages, 2.21MB] 2009 [52 Pages, 0.3MB] Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) 2014-2015 [25 Pages, 0.6MB] 2013 [8 Pages, 0.3MB] 2012 [45 Pages, 0.5MB] 2010 – 2011 [45 Pages, 0.5MB] 2008-2009 [19 Pages, 0.3MB] Pacific Command (PACOM) MDR Log, a/o November 2016 [3 Pages, 0.7MB] 2013 [5 Pages, 0.7MB] 2012 [8 Pages, 6.94MB] Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) FOIA Case Logs 2008-2016 [433 Pages, 142.5MB] FOIA Appeal Logs 2013-2016 [433 Pages, 142.5MB] – This is the same file above, but the last page holds the “Appeals” log. Peterson Air Force Base 2013 [6 Pages, 0.3mb] Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB) 2010-2016 [3 Pages, 0.9MB] RAF Lakenheath January 1, 2007 – November 26, 2008 [3 Pages, 261k] Redstone Aresenal, Alabama (Army) 2013 [2 Pages, 2.7MB] 2010-2011 [29 Pages, 2.7MB] 2008 [8 Pages, 400k] Selective Service Systems (SSS) 2008-2012 [11 Pages, 0.3MB] Social Security Administration (SSA) FOIA Case Logs 2016 [1,018 Pages, 5.3MB] 2009-2011 [2,416 Pages, 3.5MB] Special Operations Command (SOCOM) 2014 [16 Pages, 1.2MB] 2013 [5 Pages, 0.6MB] 2012 – Open Cases [84 Pages, 0.3MB] 2012 – Closed Cases [128 Pages, 0.3MB] Security Exchange Commission (SEC) FOIA Case Logs 2013 [CSV File, 1.75MB] 2012 [151 Pages, 0.7MB] 2011 [CSV File, 1.61MB] 2010 [CSV File, 1.68MB] 2009 [198 Pages, 2.7mb] FOIA Appeal Logs FY 2009-2015 [48 Pages, 1.7MB] Small Business Administration (SBA) 2016 [26 Pages, 1.2MB] Transportation Command (TRANSCOM) 2016 [16 Pages, 0.5MB] 2013 [8 Pages, 0.5MB] 2012 [8 Pages, 6.94MB] Transportation Security Administration (TSA) 3 Oldest Open Requests with Processing Notes, a/o July 2016 [58 Pages, 4.2MB] United States Agency for International Development (USAID) FY 2012 – 1Q of 2016 [166 Pages, 1.2MB] United States Census Bureau 10/1/2011 – 08/01/2012 [17 Pages, 3.5MB] 2010-2011 [57 Pages, 6.8MB] United States Patent and Trade Office (USPTO) 1/1/2011 – 08/01/2012 [27 Pages, 5MB] 2010-2011 [33 Pages, 4.7MB] United States Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) FOIA Case Logs 2010-2016 [85 Pages, 24.1MB] United States Postal Service (USPS) FOIA Case Logs 2010-2016 [1,120 Pages, 112MB] FOIA Appeal Logs 2010-2016 [85 Pages, 9.9MB] United States Postal Service / Inspector General (USPS/IG) FOIA Case Logs 2013-2015 [79 Pages, 15.3MB] 2013 [.XLSX file, 43kb] 2012 [14 Pages, 5.24MB] 2010-2011 [13 Pages, 1.1MB] 2009 [25 Pages, 6.5MB] United States Secret Service (USSS) FOIA Case Logs 2000-2015 [475 Pages, 218.8MB] – Note: LARGE File – recommended you right click and press “Save As…” to save it to your hard drive. United States Strategic Command (STRATCOM) FOIA Case Logs FY2013-2014 [8 Pages, 1.1MB] 2009 [19 Pages, 4.7MB] 2006-2008 [19 Pages, 4.7MB] Vandenberg Air Force Base FY 2007 [7 Pages, 633k] Veterans Affairs / Office of the Inspector General (VA/OIG) FOIA Case Logs 2016 [15 Pages, 5.2MB] Comments 0 comments FOIA, Freedom of Information Act, Logs FBI FILES: HISTORICAL FIGURES & GROUPSINTELLIPEDIA ENTRIES PRE-ORDER TODAY Inside The Black Vault: The Government's UFO Secrets Revealed Pre-Order THE book to own in 2019. Ships the week of April 15, 2019! Check out the exclusive, limited edition package, available ONLY right here! THE BLACK VAULT NEWSLETTER Sign up for the FREE Black Vault newsletter, updating you on case files, declassified documents, and news. SEARCH THE BLACK VAULT THE BLACK VAULT RADIO #26 - Guest: Gary Heseltine (03/01/19) #25 - Guest: Dr. Irena Scott (02/19/19) #24 - Guest: John Burroughs (02/12/19) #23 - Guest: Nick Pope (02/08/19) #22 - Guest: Alex Hollings (02/07/19) #21 - Guest: David O'Leary (01/07/19) #20 - Guest: Grant Cameron (12/28/18) #19 - Guest: Annie Jacobsen (12/18/18) #18 - Guest: Dr. Seth Shostak (12/13/18) #17 - Guest: Jeremy Corbell (11/28/18) #16 - From Project Sign to AATIP (11/23/18) #15 - Guest: Marc D'Antonio (11/12/18) #14 - Guest: David Paulides (10/12/18) #13 - Guest: Chris Rutkowski (10/5/18) #12 - Guest: Larry Hancock (9/26/18) #11 - Guests: Jeremy Corbell & George Knapp (9/10/18) #10 - Guest: Nate Jones (9/6/18) #9 - Guest: Stephen Bassett (8/31/18) #8 - Guest: Lee Speigel (8/25/18) #7 - Guest: Chris O'Brien (8/10/18) #6 - Guest: Dr. Aaron Judkins (8/1/18) #5 - Guest: Jefferson Morley (7/25/18) #4 - Guest: Dr. John B. Alexander (7/18/18) #3 - Guest: Joshua P. Warren (7/12/18) #2 - Guest: Frank Kimbler (7/6/18) #1 - Guest: Stanton Friedman (7/3/18) SUPPORT THE BLACK VAULT ADVERTISEMENT THE BLACK VAULT – FACEBOOK FEED MOST POPULAR CIA MKULTRA / Mind Control Collection Counter-Zombie Dominance, CONPLAN 8888 All UFO Documents From… Operation Mockingbird FBI Files: Scientists and Medical Professionals Mind Control Collection FBI Files: The Paranormal Collection Project Blue Book © 2019 Copyright. The Black Vault. This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. PRIVACY POLICY ✕

[garyh2628]

Chairman and Managing Operational CEO (Global Legal Authority Quasi-Judicial)

(Finance, planning, industry and foreign trade portfolios) Private

Head of Human Resources Finance and People and Global Head of Corporate Responsibility

 Investments/Contracts/Superior/Technically Competent and Right-Hand Men

NGO - (Finance, planning, industry and foreign trade portfolios) Private

 To my Pharma Hubs, Technology Hubs, Social Creative/Personal Hub, My Private Hubs, My Financial Hubs and my Health and Wellbeing/Scientific Hubs, Legal and Innovation Hubs, Hinterland Hub and to my Eastern Caribbean Hub, Linguistic/Psychology Hub, to my beloved additions and to my Institutions and Partners and Team, Pool of Potential Personal Assistants and Private Secretaries and Business Managers and also to my Fitness Hub which is an extension of my Health and Wellbeing Hub and not to forget my beloved Brooklyn Hub and my Wine/Adviser Hub and my Influential Legal Cashier.

 All Options remain on the Table

 I want to begin by thanking all my CEOs that live within the walls of this Global Structure and Network and my Property Expert Guy very, very much for the great work they are doing in getting those particulars to myself. And I know I speak for the entire Community in saying how grateful we all are, and I am so honoured to have you on my team, because I know you possess that unique Intellect.  I’m aware tat you said, you feel personally connected to me, not only you, but my all of the Community. Today is a time for celebration, and for looking back and admitting that all the hard work of reading and investigation and recoveries and tests was indeed worth it. In future years, you will recall these months and you will understand that you were involved in delivering the offices that will be the most instrumental in delivering for humanity now but also in the future.  It’s the beginning of an harvest, for you and for your children and for your grandchildren.  An harvest of Intellectual Capacity.  To be in control of your destiny.  It’s time for Humanity to live their best life!

 As this Network and this Global Structure and this Community of my Corporations, Businesses and Partners and Team and Institution and the additions and my Statement of Intent reserves increase we have those of that order, who a blanket ban was issued, trying to put their hands on our Intellectual Capacity and our hard-earned resources.  Great job Private Hubs et al, I’m really impressed with the results you are achieving, and I look forward to perusing those particulars. It’s time for you to live you best life.  Many times, we ask the question, who is in charge?  Well, I’m happy it was answered both legally and via the Network and Global Structure and my CEOs that I am in charge Globally.  I do not delegate.  Great results my Property Expert guy.  I’m looking forward to our meetings as we peruse the Global Portfolios.

 The demand for the services and Initiatives that this Network and this Global Structure have to Offer with our Partners and Statement of Intent are in demand. Demand for my leadership and access to me from my CEOs and the delivery of the particulars and also for the Portfolios is at the moment a matter of urgency.  The Demand from our Partners and demand from the Industry and also from the Sector and all the various Institutions that live within the walls of the Network is also at an all-time high.  This Network and this Global Structure will continue to grow and expand in the coming weeks. An obvious driver of this demand population growth. Over the next quarter century, the global population is forecasted to grow from about 7 billion today to approximately 9 billion. But, perhaps the more important factor to growth will be increases in living standards. As the world’s population grows, the world also becomes more prosperous. In order for shared prosperity, the Initiative and Programs that this Network has to Offer will play an integral role in the Economic lives of people and also the Environment thus allow every person first within the walls of this Global Structure, to have an opportunity to be in total control of their destiny.  We will expound on this as I deliver my Fire and Brimstone Address and also in my inaugural speech.  One on my Intellectual Capacity Partner said “This is good news. It means longer, healthier and better lives for billions of people”. As incomes in the developing world increase, more and more people will have access to consumer goods, automobiles and appliances. From smartphones to air conditioners, all of these things take a robust Intellect and the ability for people to have access to a vast pool of Intellectual Capacity.  We will win for pay and we will win the Election.  It’s time for you to live your best life and we will deliver for Humanity.

Growth – Analysis shows that nearly all of this growth will occur in the developing world, with two thirds coming from the Asia-Pacific region. This Network and this Global Structure and with our Intellectual Partners and Team and Institutions and the new additions are best positioned with our unique intellectual capacity to be the fuel of that Growth. The industry is responding to these demographic trends by expanding investments across the value chain. As we have witnessed throughout our industry’s history, much of the investment in manufacturing is occurring where the demand is.  We will win in all the regions we operate in, we will win for Manufacturing and we will win Intellectual Capacity and we will win for Finance and we will deliver value for Investment.  We will deliver for Humanity.  It’s time to live your best life.

 Our influence is continuing to expand across Sectors and as a result of the work that we have in the pipeline, new Sectors are emerging that will stand the test of time. At the other end of the value chain, the industry is responding to changes driven by our customers, most notably the desire for more sustainable solutions. Now more than ever, consumers worldwide are looking for affordable, sustainable and safe products that they can trust for their families. Our industry is playing a key role in meeting all of these challenges. On delivery of the particulars and on the pool out of the Offices, we will issue definition, that have been developed and would have gone through our extra level of scrutiny before being rolled out within the Network and the Global Structure and also the Statement of Intent and to our vast pool of Investor and to Industry and within Sector. We will for Mergers, and we will for Acquisition and we will win for the statement of Intent and we will win for my vast pool of Influential Advisers Globally.  We must win!

 (Laugh) Although he missed out on the initial stages, he’s still outperforming my expectations.  I would say to my Property Expert Guy that you haven’t missed out on anything.  You came in at the right moment and the most pivotal juncture. All the legal first you have achieved in order to protect my Global Portfolio, are all outstanding work.  I was very encouraged to read such sparkling trading statement from my OLC last week.  I’m looking forward to sitting with my Personal CEO of my Wealth Fund in the coming weeks and yourself and OLC as we peruse these particulars.  I’m getting the feeling that we have again achieved a clean sweep retrospectively!  I can’t wait to see these details. The good news? After three years of negotiations and debate, all of the region’s with regards to the legal framework for the Community has been agreed.  I’m looking forward to the delivery of the Offices and these particulars for further. It was said that no time in history has a set of development goals bolder and more ambitious than anything that has come before them.  This Network and this Global Structure and our Partners and our Institution and all of my Companies and my Statement of Intent, will not only win for now, we will allow the environment to make you win the future for yourself.  We will deliver for Education and we will deliver for Intellect and we will deliver for regulations, and cross border compliance and we will deliver full capacity Policies.  We must win. You and I have a mandate, to deliver for Humanity.  It’s time for you to live your best life!

 Getting consensus on such a broad development agenda was an achievement in itself, but the real work will start when the Offices are delivered ten will it sink in. “We have a big, bold agenda before us. Now we must work to make it real,” my Influential Adviser and Property Expert guy and OLC et al.. How, exactly, does the United Nations plan to do so? “We will need all partners to make this a success.” Multistakeholder partnerships, involving the entire Network and Global Structure and Institutions and the Team of the Statement of Intent.  We must deliver the particulars and we must deliver the Offices and we must deliver the tool kits and we must deliver the Global Portfolio in order for shared Prosperity and our further responsibility to the Environment.  We will deliver the full report from the Innovation Hub and the OLC and from my Berlin Intellectual Hub and the Eastern Caribbean OLC with regards to the names that the full staff will be chosen from. We must win.

 I love you, I love you, I love you!  Truth to tell, Tell it First and Tell it like it is.

This family will win the Election, This family will deliver for pay, This family will deliver for shared Prosperity, This Family will Deliver for Education, This Family will deliver for Finance and Regulation, This Family will deliver Formidable Policies that will stand the test of Time, Scope, Depth, Width, Full Capacity. This Family will deliver for Humanity and Intellect.  We hear you, we understand you, and the hinterlands will be peopled, and they will be developed, we understand you, those Natural Resources will be translated into prosperity for you. It’s time for you to live your best life, It’s time for you to be in Control of your Destiny!  I love you, I love you more!

 Chairman and Managing Operational CEO (Global Legal Authority Quasi-Judicial)

[olcshippingline]

Air Cargo Freight Services by OLC Shipping Line: Enhancing Global Logistics

In the dynamic world of international trade and logistics, air cargo plays a crucial role in expediting shipments and meeting urgent delivery requirements. OLC Shipping Line stands out as a trusted partner in providing comprehensive air cargo freight services that ensure efficient and reliable transportation of goods across the globe.

Tailored Solutions for Diverse Needs

OLC Shipping Line offers tailored solutions to meet a wide range of air freight needs. Whether you are shipping perishable goods requiring temperature-controlled environments, high-value items needing enhanced security measures, or oversized cargo demanding specialized handling, our team is equipped to manage every aspect of your air freight shipment.

Global Reach, Local Expertise

With a global network of partners and agents, OLC Shipping Line facilitates seamless air cargo services from origin to destination. Our local expertise combined with international connections ensures smooth customs clearance, documentation, and timely deliveries, regardless of the destination.

Efficiency and Reliability

At OLC Shipping Line, we prioritize efficiency and reliability in every air cargo shipment. Our streamlined processes and advanced tracking systems enable real-time monitoring of shipments, providing transparency and peace of mind to our customers.

Commitment to Customer Satisfaction

Customer satisfaction is at the core of our business philosophy. We work closely with our clients to understand their unique logistics requirements and offer personalized solutions that exceed expectations. From small businesses to large corporations, we cater to diverse industries and consistently deliver exceptional service.

Innovative Approach

Innovation drives our approach to air cargo freight services. OLC Shipping Line invests in cutting-edge technologies and continuously explores new strategies to optimize routes, reduce transit times, and minimize environmental impact.

Conclusion

In conclusion, OLC Shipping Line is your partner of choice for air cargo freight services. With our commitment to excellence, global reach, and customer-centric approach, we ensure that your air freight shipments are handled with precision and care. Experience the difference with OLC Shipping Line and let us elevate your logistics operations to new heights. Contact us today to explore how we can assist you with your air cargo needs.

Read More;

Freight forward services

Custom clearance services

Export clearance services