#of a dangerous quest/another trauma to the pile of trauma - i'd rather having a luke without any physical scars yet faithful to the books
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
hellisanhonourstudent · 11 months ago
Text
#PERCY IS ANGRY SPECIFICALLY THIS SPECIFICALLY THIS#i dont think they understood how ANGRY these kids were. clarisse was angry too. luke was angry. percy was angry. these kids were angry#and these kids weren't alright#i wish throughout the episodes. theyd always have this palpable anger brewing underneath#i wish there'd be this sense of urgency because throughout the books everything was going so fast and like. it felt like ur hands were shak#shaking. from how intense the scenes were#i wish they'd kept that in the show#i wanted to see luke's bitterness in the way he spoke about camp#i loved the fact that the reason clarisse hated percy so much was because he did something better than her but i wished theyd expressed tha#in a more agressive? way . i guess#but also whatever#i may just be slightly insane#i guess
ok i really really really enjoyed watching the first two episodes and i think the show is already so faithful to the books in ways the movies wished they were BUT i’m gonna be a bitch just because i can and rant about a few insignificant but at the same time very important Things the writers didn’t Understand:
percy is angry.
and i know this is seen with his anger towards poseidon in the show, but i’m talking angry. as in, generally speaking. when he’s with grover and they’re talking about nancy, percy says something along the lines of “we should fight back,” and grover’s like “noooo we can’t stand up to bullies.” and then percy stands up to her and blah blah blah…but in the books percy’s first line is “i’m going to kill her” after she throws a sandwich at grover. grover talks him out of it because he’s already on probation.
with just this scene we know percy stands up to bullies, and that’s partly why he has so much trouble at school! in the show, he stands up to nancy, apparently for the first time, and gets kicked out because of it! sorry but as someone who worked in a school, i know for a fact that kids can get away with so much more before they’re actually kicked out lol. it would’ve made sense, like in tlt, that he’s already at risk of suspension so him “pushing” nancy is the final straw. it’s just very weird, considering it could be only a line of dialogue that makes percy’s anger and the connection between his outburst and him getting kicked out more clear.
consequently, percy arrives at his appartment and gabe is just a general (still admittedly abusive) jerk instead of a drunk, violent (also abusive) man. when we meet gabe, it makes a lot of sense why percy has so much trouble with his anger. it’s easy to see that connection. literal child + alcoholic abusive father figure = there’s bound to be some trouble….that’s not really the case in the show, especially in the way that sally easily stands up to him. people have said a fair bit about this topic already, so i’m not gonna expand on that, but i really wish the writers had focused more on percy’s internal anger, as it’s such an important part of his character and affects the way he reacts to things throughout the books; it just worries me that in the first episode it wasn’t as established. i. e. he hates dionysus on sight because he reminds him of smelly gabe, he hates the gods—is angry at poseidon—because, where was he when my mom and i were suffering at the hands of smelly gabe? ok i’m not gonna talk about more of this or of sally because other people have said it and i could write a four page essay of what the show got wrong plus i want to talk abt other things before this gets too long:
the monster scenes.
the mrs. dodds being a fury reveal felt sooo…weird? even the movie version did it better lol. it felt super rushed and strange how percy’s just standing there and the next he’s on the ground, but he had riptide with him so he just impaled her and then she turned to dust??? in the books, not only does she get percy alone, but grover tries to stand up to her—which is a big deal since he knows what she truly is and shows how much he cares for percy in that moment. percy has time to be genuinely terrified bc he’s alone with a literal monster and he’s about to die…and chiron throws him riptide just in time, but then he too vanishes so percy’s left wondering if he imagined everything. but no, in the show mrs. dodds comes out of nowhere and attacks him, and it’s so fast that percy doesn’t have time to dwell on wtf happened. the situation doesn’t seem as serious as it does in the book; in the book she tries to interrogate percy bc she thinks he’s the lightning thief, and when she doesn’t get her answer, she attacks him. this is another thing: the stakes. they don’t feel as high in the show because there’s no annabeth trying to ask percy what was stolen, no hellhound, no fates cutting a string, and no alecto/mrs. dodds interrogation. there’s not much of a lead up to the quest, really.
theeen the minotaur scene, which also feels super weirdly paced and there’s just not that same sense of urgency. again, other people have talked about this, so i’ll just stick to another main concern of mine: grover’s role in the scene. it was so strange how in the book he’s semi unconscious and in the show he’s fine (so fine that sally does something completely out of character and makes grover swear to keep percy safe? she would never put that much pressure in a child???) ok so he seems fine in the show, but then when they’re running percy’s holding him as if he can’t walk???? they’re not even fully sprinting, given that a monster is chasing them lol. (the problem with the stakes; i mean with the way they run and have an entire talk with sally makes it feel like they’re not in any real danger).
back to grover: he was perfectly fine, and he got percy back safe. not at all like in tlt, where percy has to practically carry him back, after loosing his mom and killing the minotaur. THEN percy passes out and later wakes up at the big house. this is important, bc grover’s entire THING is being percy’s protector, and he couldn’t do that properly bc he was indisposed. he felt awful. of course he did. his character arc is overcoming the guilt and insecurities—that he’s not a proper protector and therefore can’t search for pan; his main character motivation—by successfully completing the quest and helping percy retrieve the master bolt.
these are just little seeds that needed to be planted in the first two episodes of the show…so that the rest of the show feels cohesive and makes sense with what happens in tlt. if these character traits and scenes are looked over and not given proper importance/not replaced with something similar, then the show will have a different tone than it does to the books. i don’t think it’s necessarily bad, but it is disappointing that the details sprinkled in the source material are lost in translation. they may have seemed insignificant to the writers, but not to meeee!!!!!!
#pjo#pjo show crit#anti pjo show#i agree with everything specially the anger part#charlie is convincing as the popular kid but he's more of a light yagami kinda kid than a luke castellan kinda kid(I'm using the manga here#now onto comparing two of my blorbos#light is an upper middle class charming gifted kid with loving if not flawed parents who never had a difficult day in life before using#the death note thinking it was basically creepyasta and accidentally killed two people - then he somehow reached the conclusion he had to#kill more and that having the dn was his fate - he came up with a self-sacrifice narrative and all that jazz#luke was probably also a gifted kid but he was a fatherless boy and his mom had a supernatural mental illness and couldn't take care of him#may's crises were so bad luke made himself homeless at 9 and lived in the streets until he was 14#then he went to chb and had to take care of a bunch of other abandoned children and there was his failed quest and starting to serve kronos#disclaimer:i'm not saying how traumatized people should act irl i'm just talking about fiction#but book!luke while nice and gentle there was also this harsh edge to him#on itself it doesn't raise much of a red flag - percy has it annabeth has it grover has it clarisse has it many of the hermes children have#besides luke is supposed to be tough and sharp - in tlt percy said he ''looked like he could deal with just anything'' and charlie doesn't#give me such vibes he's acts too much like one of those outgoing rich popular kids#i don't give a shit about luke's scar tho#no matter how bad/gnarly/whatever it's when associated to this ''luke'' it seems more like an unfortunate accident than the result#of a dangerous quest/another trauma to the pile of trauma - i'd rather having a luke without any physical scars yet faithful to the books#than that ''cuddly buddy-shaped'' imitation#don't @ me
1K notes · View notes