#number 1 women liker
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Rules: Make a poll of your favorite female characters (no limits - as many or as little as you want) and see which your followers like the most!
Thank you @monimolimnion Madi for this idea!
*holds out hand* come like women with me
@queenychu @daddywright @bitterqueenbean @contritecactite @krisseycrystal Sorry if y’all have been tagged before come like women with me
The poll won’t let me add more, so here’s more for posterity
Maya Fey (Ace Attorney)
Susato (Great Ace Attorney)
Diana Cavendish (Little Witch Academia)
Akko Katara (LWA)
Adora Bell Dearheart (Discworld)
Polly Perkins (Discworld)
Gideon Nav (The Locked Tomb)
Harrowhark (Locked Tomb)
Ryuko Matoi (Kill La Kill)
Mako (Kill La Kill)
Luz (The Owl House)
Eda (TOH)
Amity (TOH)
Pearl (Steven Universe) (she never did a single bad thing her entire life)
20 notes · View notes
wintergrofyuri · 25 days ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
shes literally done nothing wrong ever in her life and she is my pretty pretty princess and beautiful lovely wife she is so perfect and beautiful and if you dont like her you die and go to hell and suffer for eternity and then you die again and go to super hell bc you just suck that much that you had to die twice
94 notes · View notes
semi-imaginary-place · 1 year ago
Text
who left a bad first impression in fe3h? Lorenz hands down, he has a good heart once you can get past all the noble bullshit but wow is there a lot of get through. It took many playthroughs, but through his supports and a lot of time I started to appreciate him a little more he really does want the best for others and really does out of his way to help people its also just strongly filtered through the talk of noble obligations. Ferdinand to a lesser extent he's really obnoxious in part 1 and that ends up highlighting his character growth in part 2 all that much more. It only one playthrough to warm up to Ferdie but much much longer to come around to Lorenz. Sylvain is an interesting case in that I liked his character design from the start, and then he opened his mouth and I wanted to start waterboarding him until he respected women. After many supports and multiple playthroughs, like Lorenz I came around to Sylvain, so much in fact that he's now one of my favorite characters but I still simultaneously want to punch him in the face, he really does deserve it sometimes. I disliked Hubert immediately, grody ass wannabe vampire, and after 20 some playthoughs and thousands of hours I can say that: I never stopped disliking him.
Lorenz is more in your face obnoxious, Sylvain is more manipulative. Lorenz is more easy to detect as unpleasant but Sylvain probably does more damage. Lorenz has good intentions but is so caught up in his ideal of nobility and is about 15 miles deep into classism that he's insufferable. His ego is massive and he refuses to take no because of course he knows better than them, no woman can resist Lorenz! Hellman! Gloucester! Sylvain is on a self destruction binge and using women to feed into his self loathing. He sets up his relationships to fail and then when the woman inevitably gets fed up with his lying cheating bullshiting ass he turns on them accusing them of only wanting him for his family name, money, and crest. Which he uses as proof that he is useless and worthless and that.
Most people find him annoying. There's an unusually high number of Lorenz likers on the fe3h subreddit because there's a concentration of players there who have seen most/all of the supports and that's where his character shines. The average FE3H player plays 1 route or less and doesn't see many supports probably sees Lorenz being an ass once and then never sees any of his supports if they are on Golden Deer at all which is the least popular starting house.
Happy to see lorenzpilled people out there in the wild. Lorenz is obnoxious and infuriating but that's just the first layer and it's a shame how often he's overlooked and underappreciated. It took me over 3? 5? playthroughs before I came around to him, it was a slow and painful process but he grew on me, like a fungus. The Lorenz and Marianne supports are some of my favorites in the game, they really show his kind nature, he's always trying to look out for others, you see it in his Lysithea supports too. Like that moment in Marianne's support she's struggling with something and he says he'd rather not know if telling him pains her so much. Lorenz cares a lot and he spends his life trying to help people and make their lives better, he's really quite sweet, he just goes about it in the most infuriating way possible.
His jp voice actor is more over the top outrageous than his eng voice actor, he sounds like a cartoon aristocrat it's so funny.
15 notes · View notes
laceratedlamiaceae · 2 years ago
Text
You know what, fuck it. I'm going to rank every character in ofmd based on how hot they are, in terms of both appearance and personality. I'd like to offer a preemptive apology to Ed and Stede likers because this is not kind to them.
#1: Izzy - 9.95/10
Tumblr media
Obviously he's my number one. He isn't quite perfect; I had to give him a 9.9 on looks for his flat ass. He does get a 10/10 for personality though, because he's literally exactly like me and I'm a narcissist.
#2: Calico Jack - 9.5/10
Tumblr media
He's a 10/10 for looks and a 9/10 for personality. I love the mustache so much and while the whole frat bro vibe might get kind of annoying eventually, at least he's fun.
#3: Ivan - 9/10
Tumblr media
9/10 for both looks and personality. I love men who are quiet and just kind of stand there without really doing anything, and what little things he does say or do are great.
#4: Frenchie - 8.5/10
Tumblr media
Frenchie's an easy 9/10 for personality; he's just a chill guy. He's an 8/10 for looks; his beard isn't on the level of Jack's mustache but he still looks good.
#5: Fang - 8.5/10
Tumblr media
I love the beard, the headband, the open vest; everything about him is so hot, 10/10. He's a bit too expressive for me; I prefer men who are totally repressed, so he gets a 7/10 for personality.
#6: Mr. Buttons - 8/10
Tumblr media
He gets an 8/10 for looks; I love the beard and the long hair paired with the bald spot. It's hard to give him a score for personality but I'll give him an 8/10 because he can talk to birds.
#7: Wee John - 8/10
Tumblr media
I love the beard and tattoos; he's an 8/10 for looks. He doesn't really do much which earns him an 8/10 for personality too.
#8: Black Pete - 8/10
Tumblr media
He kind of looks like my dad but if I set that aside he gets an 8/10 for looks; I just want to slap his bald head. I kind of love how pathetic it is that he's constantly telling obviously fake stories that nobody believes so he's also an 8/10 for personality.
#9: Roach - 7.5/10
Tumblr media
He's good at baking and completely unhinged so he's a 9/10 for personality. He would get a higher score for appearance but he's only a 6/10 because smoking isn't sexy.
#10: Jim - 7/10
Tumblr media
They're an easy 10/10 for personality. I love the way they look with the fake beard, but if I'm judging them without it I'll give them a 4/10.
#11: Lucius - 6.5/10
Tumblr media
I'm sorry, the sideburns just do not do it for me, so he's only a 6/10 for appearance. He's mostly cool but also kind of annoying so I'll give him an 7/10 for personality.
#12: Oluwande - 6/10
Tumblr media
He would look nice if it weren't for the crocs and whatever that shirt is, which drag him down to a 6/10. He's also just too nice for my tastes, so he's a 6/10 for personality too.
#13: Doug - 5.5/10
Tumblr media
He looks alright I guess but he's a little too boring for me, 6/10. He's also way too nice and supportive; good for Mary but I could never. 5/10 for personality.
#14: Chauncey Badminton - 5.5/10
Tumblr media
I know he and Nigel are twins but the bald look puts Chauncey a little bit ahead at a 8/10. For personality he gets a 3/10, because "guy who's driven homicidally insane after the guy he bullied as a kid kills his brother" is kind of hot in a fucked up way.
#15: Spanish Jackie - 5/10
Tumblr media
I'm gay, so she gets a 0/10 on looks even though she does slay in that red velvet. If I was into women she would definitely be a 10/10 though. And of course she's a 10/10 for personality.
#16: Mary - 5/10
Tumblr media
Still gay, so again a 0/10 on looks, but we stan a woman who tries to kill her husband so that's a 10/10 for personality.
#17: Evelyn - 5/10
Tumblr media
Once again not into women, so 0/10 for looks. And do I even need to say it? Of course she's a 10/10 for personality.
#18: The Swede - 2.5/10
Tumblr media
He's a 5/10 for appearance; he doesn't look bad, but he doesn't really do it for me either. I completely forgot about him until I saw him in the background of a gif so I think that's an automatic 0/10 for personality. Sorry :(
#19: Nigel Badminton - -1.5/10
Tumblr media
He's awful but he is kind of hot. -10/10 for personality, 7/10 for looks.
#20: Stede - -1.5/10
Tumblr media
He's a solid 7/10 for looks but a -10/10 for personality. Don't get me wrong, I love him, but I also despise him and he's literally the worst (besides Ed).
#21: Ed - -499999996.5/10
Tumblr media
Yeah sorry, he's last. He's a 10/10 on looks (with the beard; he's a 4/10 without it), but he's a -1000000000/10 for personality. It feels like the writers were deliberately trying to create the most annoying character possible to me personally. I was too distracted by how hot he was to really notice at first but now every time I rewatch the show I start to hate him even more.
35 notes · View notes
topicprinter · 6 years ago
Link
How focused is your targeting? Is it too narrow or too broad? Are you wasting money on people that aren’t converting?I do a lot of Facebook ads ‘audits’ and one of the biggest issues people have with Facebook ads is the targeting.There are a million options, it’s all confusing as hell, and you don't know where to even start.Breathe.The targeting available through Facebook ads is possibly the thing that holds it above any other advertising channel as the most effective place to put an ad out these days.So here is a brief-is explanation of how to go about targeting your ads.I’m not including every single detail because I think it would get too confusing, and that’s the opposite of the point of this.First up, here are the available targeting options, and what they all are:1. Custom audiences -These are audiences built from user behaviour. Your email list (or a section of it)People who visited your website, or a specific page on it, or took a specific action (i.e. filled in the contact form)People who have interacted with your app.People who have interacted with something on your FB page (a video, a post, a lead form, an event) or your Instagram page.Or you can set offline interactions, but I’m leaving that out here for simplicity’s sake.The pixel that you have associated with your Ads account tracks all this stuff, and you can tell FB that you want to create any audience listed above. If it’s something like ‘people who engaged with this video in the last 7 days’ then that will be a constantly updating group of people over time.We use custom audiences for retargeting, but that's not something I'm covering here.2. Lookalike audiences (LLAs) -This is where you take any of those custom audiences you created, and tell Facebook “find me more people like this”.You choose a country to base your LLA in, and a percentage of the population - so if you choose 5% and Belgium, then Facebook will make a big list of the 5% of Belgian people it thinks are most like the people who watched that video in the last 7 days.3. Location -  List as many locations as you like to make up your audience. Also add areas to exclude if you know those people aren’t who you want to see your ad, and you can specify people who are:currently in a location,who have recently been there,who live there,who are travelling there,or all of the above.You can also drop a pin and choose a radius around that point it you want.4. Age & Gender -Fairly self-explanatory, although there will always be people in your results who haven’t told FB that they are one gender or the other.5. Interest targeting -The area that people get most wrong, most often - and the subject of a lot of focus with all the Cambridge Analytica stuff.You can choose to target people based on Demographic info - such as ‘newlyweds' or ‘college educated'Interests - such as ‘handbags’ or ‘volunteering'Behaviours - such as ‘owns amazon fire’ or ‘listed themselves as small business owner'You can narrow your audience by choosing people who are in both interest A and interest B, or by excluding a group - so people who like A but NOT B.​6. Connections -Choose to target or exclude people who already like your page/event/app, and/or their FB friends.​- - -All that choice. Where do you start?You start with the end in mind.Facebook is a very powerful platform, and you always want to be setting things up in such a way that it lets the mysterious algorithm do the heavy listing.For that reason, you’ll find that 9 times out of 10, lookalike audiences work the best.So, work backwards from there. The first question you want to answer is - Do you have a good enough custom audience to build a Lookalike?You can’t create a lookalike audience from a custom audience of less than 100 people, but also you wouldn’t want to.Facebook doesn’t give us any official numbers either, but from my experience, you want at least 500 ‘buyers’, 1500+ email subscribers, or 5000 'page likers' to get the best results.This is always a judgment call - it makes sense that 500 current clients is better than 1000 people who just watched a video on your page - but where exactly those cut-off points are we don’t know.​- - -If you don’t have a big enough custom audience, then you’re likely going to look to the interests and age/gender/location to get you there.Tips for non-lookalike-based targeting:Don't go too broad, if you run a yoga shop, then adding ‘health’ and ‘hobbies’ and ‘sport’ is going to include literally millions of people who aren’t a good fit for you.Make use of the ‘exclude’ option - so if you wrote a book called "how to sell gently", then adding in something like ‘entrepreneurship’ and EXCLUDING people who like Grant Cardone could be worth trying.But don’t go too small - unless your budget is tiny, targeting business owners who have expressed an interest in both Kundalini yoga & meditation, is not going to leave you enough people.Don't lump together a bunch of interests in one ad set, because you can’t then tell which one worked and which didn’t - split them into different ad setsTesting is key - you might find that targeting people who like Tony Robbins works great for your online meditation training, but there is probably a cheaper option to target out there.If you are a local business, then forget all about interests, and just stick a radius around your business location that you know people already travel to get to you, and add in the correct age-range and gender.Get very clear on your customer avatar - the better you can describe them, the easier it’s going to be finding appropriate interests to test.Make use of the ‘friends of people who like your page’ option - social proof is a massive deal when it comes to persuasiveness, and FB tells you that “Steve like this page” when they show you the ad, so use that.​But the big point is to TEST.Don’t be the person who threw an ad up, left it at £10 a day for a week, then said that FB ads don’t work - you’re a fool.As the platform gets more saturated with ads, the costs are rising, and often winning or not with FB ads comes down to being able to find pockets of audience that aren’t being reached by your competitors.FB ads are an auction, and the amount of people who want to target the same user is one of the things that determines the cost of your ads, that’s why going for ‘people who like football’ is expensive.Use the ‘breakdown’ column in Ads manager to look at the different delivery categories and try to find groups of people you can try excluding.A quick point on analysis - telling people to test is all well and good, but HOW do you do that.The easiest thing to look at is the CTR (click-through rate). If you’re testing two audiences against each other, with an idenctal advert - then the amount of people who click on that advert is a safe metric to use to know which is a better fit.BUT - don’t focus on that at the expense of conversions - if you’re trying to get signups for your ebook - then look at the cost per signup alongside the click-through-rate. It’s find to pay 87p per click compared to 52p IF those 87p’ers are converting twice as well.- - -​Here are some Extracts from audits I’ve done for various businesses in the last few months to give some real life examples:​Charity organisation offering low-interest loans - "As you can see, the generally high relevance score and CTR shows that the targeting is relatively strong, but there are ways to improve it I'll cover later in the report.Furthermore, there is no significant return (ROI) in targeting 35-44 year olds, so they could be excluded”Local football coaching program for kids -"It’s hard to be definite on all of this because the way these ads are setup means I can’t see number of signups, but it looks like your targeting could probably be improved.Location: You are using location targeting which is great, I often get better results using a radius around an area that specific towns, but that is just something to test, rather than a problem.Age range: You are showing ads to <16’s all the way to 60+ year olds. This is likely costing you money. Have a look at your existing clients, I bet that 80% of them fall into a 20 year age range, maybe 30-50? If so, your money is going to be best spent just speaking to those people.Gender: Without testing I’m couldn’t say for sure, but might these ads to work better to just women? Typically they are the ones organising activities, and even if (to generalise massively) dads would be excited about their kids going to football classes, it will still probably be the mums who sort it out."Online coaching company - promoting B2B events in London -"For any type of local event, I’ve generally had best results from fairly open interest targeting, but quite tight geographical and age targeting, so I would try that, rather than something like London + 62km, which is a massive distance/amount of people.”Driver instructor training -"For your traffic campaign, you’ve left the targeting blank, other than using age and location.This is often an effective strategy if you serve a wide client base, but you’re using a 5km radium, which seems very small, and again means that the frequency is very high (6/7+ on those ads).I don’t know enough about your business to know if 5km really is the furthest people will travel, but it seems very tight.In terms of the age groups, you are getting the best click through rate from 25-34 year olds (males specifically), which suggests the messaging is connecting with them best.In general, men are clicking more often than women - which doesn’t seem surprising”SEO company"You’ve created a saved audience that comprises of people who are identified themselves as small business owners, and are interested in SEO stuff.That’s a perfectly good starting point, but leaving it there means that you’re starting from scratch each time.Using lookalike audiences, based on people who have read/interacted/ signed up with you before will let FB’s algorithm do much of the hard work and should see better results.If you also follow the above strategy, you will be creating audiences based on past behaviour and interaction, which means you’ll be showing your stuff to people who have already shown an interest, rather than showing it to brand new people each time and letting this interested people go cold.How is the split in terms of age/gender with your clients?Looking at your ads, you can see that there is often a big different in cost per result for male vs female, so this is worth paying attention to, so that you can get the best ROI on each campaign.”Low-price gym chain - "The temptation is to add in interests like ‘Weight loss’ or ‘Crossfit’, but honestly, it’s not the right way to go.It’s more expensive to target people who have identified themselves as interested in specific things like Crossfit because FB works like an auction, so choosing an ‘obvious’ interest means that everyone is bidding on the same people, and the price goes up.Also, you’re missing out on all the people who don’t already ‘like’ fitness related topics yet, but would be open to improving their health & fitness.- You’ll likely get better results just sticking to age, gender and location. Have a look at where your clients come from, how far away it’s worth travelling, and choose the radius around your base according to that.- Your messaging will then qualify people, rather than using the targeting options."​Ecommerce business selling gaming console products"For some of your campaigns, you’re doing no targeting at all apart from UK, aged 25-44 - that’s an audience of 20m people, and clearly your ads aren’t relevant to all of those, so you’re getting charged more because of the amount of people who don’t care.The thing is, computer games are some people’s literal FAVOURITE THINGS, so when you get your targeting right, all the metrics that Facebook care about (relevance and engagement mainly) will go through the roof, which will see your ad cost plummet.Basically, you’re not testing different targeting options, and you’re not using the data to guide you.Age: You want to be testing different age ranges for different campaigns - firstly think of who each campaign will be most relevant to, but then look at the numbers - this [XYZ] ad for example: You’ve spent £100 to get 2 sales from 25-34 year olds, and £157 to get 17 sales from 35-44 year olds.Gender: Clearly your audience is mainly guys, and the numbers show that, with conversions and click-through-rates way lower for females, so stop spending money on them.Interest targeting: With the level of fandom that people have in the computer game world, you’re leaving a big opportunity on the table by not testing interest targeting.That said, given that you’ve now got a sizeable number of clients and FB page fans, you might be able to jump straight into Lookalike audiences.Lookalike audiences: Using your existing clients & fans as a seed audience you can basically let Facebook get on with what it’s best at, which is letting the algorithm run.The way to do this is to start broad and get progressively narrower.Friends of FB page fans. I saw you tested this, which is a good idea, but think about using that information to get engagement, i.e. who did you used to play [x] with?or take comments like this and run a “does your boyfriend love old computer games...” type ad:"Online health coach - "Telling Facebook you want people who match ANY of the following targeting options: Food & Drink, Entertainment, Hobbies & Activities, Technology, is far too broad, it’s basically everyone, who DOESN’T like entertainment or hobbies…?Instead, narrow the audience down, so people who Like X AND Y AND Z. That starts painting a picture.But actually, I think you’ll get more benefit with interest targeting if you think about the BUSINESSES/ PEOPLE who your target audience follow, and combing them for your targeting.You sent me the excel file with all that good avatar info, so try out women who like 50 shades AND Secret Escapes & Come Dine With Me...That will get you started, then once you’ve built up enough people you can play with the Lookalike audience feature that FB has."- - -This ended up longer than planned, I hope you find it useful - don’t let the complexity of FB’s targeting options put you off.
0 notes