#lioumness
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
A Aa Aai Aarskaa Aart Aasp Aauee Aaunt Aaustai Ae Aeintshaunt Aeiount Aeipueausp Aeistsou Aeksteu Aerhaesp Aethe Aeunt Aeust Ai Aiiae Aiort Airhai Amoeu Ankeurs Antoont Ao Aoshiaoirt Aoskaairt Ars Ask Astthei Astueaust Au Auchiaort Aunkaust Aust Auuaa Chaenteu Chaeskmuoink Chee Chioo Chooinkeau Chountia Chueoskluosp Chuoeihtho E Eai Eaou Eastuask Eaursee Eaushueo Ee Eeiueonk Eeoa Eeu Eeuiei Ei Eint Eio Eirt Eirtrhoau Eithou El Eo Eoaist Eoi Eoistea Eont Eontkau Eountfueai Ert Esk Esp Est Euntuea Eurtchuou Eusheors Eusp Faantieount Faaueoi Feartuae Fiou Foisua Foospxe Fouaa Fuo Fuoers He Hea Heart Heunk Hioeursthuoousk Ho Hoaskuoink Hoeisk Hosp Huastnienk Hueusk Iaairioust Iaaisters Iaarssioi Iaast Iaeinthuaa Iai Iaieo Iaisteu Iakieai Ialaau Iank Iao Iaoi Iaoispet Iaosp Iaourtaa Iaouspiaai Iaunt Iaurt Iaurtio Iax Ieai Ieaispuoou Ieau Ieaus Iee Ieeirs Ieenk Ieeuoai Ieink Ieirs Ieispthoo Ieoi Ieoieai Ieorhueaunk Ieoriaunt Ieouspmueei Ieu Ieukueou Ieuou Ieusp Ieuuonk Io Ioa Ioaspe Ioastpost Ioauuee Ioent Ioest Ioeunkioei Ioi Ioia Ioiiourt Ioink Ioiskriau Ioo Iooia Iooisp Iooixueoint Ioou Ioskpoa Iosp Iostchieant Iotuoeint Ioue Iount Iourt Kaieeint Kaintthe Keeipask Keoirt Keopiou Kest Kiea Kieachieurt Kieaukueisk Kiespkieosp Kioortthaeusk Ko Koeist Kourosk Kuers Laeu Lert Liaostioaun Lieoushnuaaink Lietoent Lioum Lo Loeuousp Lua Lueank Luearsieu Lueei Maotourh Mau Maunk Meithank Meunkshiaaust Mieukua Moankshe Mousthaai Moustuoi Muausk Muoust Naaiskour Naeu Nai Naoisp Neairiaesk Nersei Nert Niaort Nieant Nieau Nieestueot Nioeesk Nioeskueust Niouie Noankiou Noaurt Nooichank Nua Oa Oart Oaue Oauiaa Oe Oei Oeirs Oeiskstau Oeituont Oi Oieo Oink Oinkthienk Oirtuai Oiskoai Ontchua Ooisk Oonkieaisp Ooshua Orhueeusk Ors Ortue Ospfoourt Ospshuai Ost Ountfiaesp Pa Paistruaisp Pankoauth Pankuaau Paoiiesp Pearsuoust Peaurt Pioei Pioo Poe Poo Puaask Pueauoei Puoink Puoo Raertaosp Raest Raoinksia Rasp Rau Rea Reeuesk Rhaaup Rhe Rheeust Rhent Rheskuoousp Rhiaou Rhiauoeu Rhioirt Rhoort Rhueai Rhuou Rieo Rieoirs Rioeurt Roank Ruae Ruasteam Ruaurt Sa Saeskmuers Seeiaask Sehiounk Seourhuau Shaaistluoust Sharhuaosk Shaunoai Sheenk Sheurs Shiaunkchue Shioaxuei Shiounk Shoost Shou Shuears Shuoethuoi Siaich Siaoiuo Sionkruont Sta Staestio Staoisk Steeirs Stiauioo Stieaspfo Stoaioeunt Stoe Stoeiiaoi Stoi Stou Stuest Sueusk Suoe Taeuuers Taionk Tasteei Tausptiae Tauxenk Taxiaasp Teei Teouskthioousk Texiaai Thaoist Thaunkooink Thent Theorhat Theoua Thient Thioaeh Thioei Thiohoosp Thiooske Thoai Thoerhiooirt Thooi Thootheisk Thuaau Thuoers Thuooistrheeu Tiaei Tioaunkuent Tiooipert Tounkuoop Tount Tours Tuaei Tueai Tueo Tuoestuaa Ua Uaa Uaaink Uaaipuoeu Uaankuai Uaaurtoeurh Uaei Uaenk Uaeu Uaeuspstieal Uaeust Uai Uaiaent Uaie Uaiie Uailio Uaint Uaioesk Uaiuesp Uaoikiao Uaoistsuae Uaonieai Uaourstieu Uast Uaumaeunk Uauoe Uaurs Uausk Uea Ueai Ueast Ueastmoaint Uee Ueeunkmo Ueirtseonk Ueo Ueosk Ueou Uersthoink Uert Ueu Uoertro Uoeu Uoeursmiooist Uoioenk Uoistfiaust Uomiou Uont Uontaesp Uooaist Uoonk Uors Uosp Uost Uousk Xaosk Xasp Xeouoai Xiap Xiaursshort Xieu Xo Xoeuoo Xoofiei Xooink Xoorsrhuoch Xuaa Xueurseeut
0 notes
Text
“It seems like nowadays it’s much more difficult to express love in Arabic. What do you think about that?”
“I would say that it’s much more the context than the language because in the language there’s so much poetry and ways to express love. Still, it’s sad... I’ve heard this as well from my cousin who lives in Lebanon. There’s conservatism around marriage and stuff. But I think on the other hand it’s also difficult in Europe I guess, because marriage isn’t a big thing anymore; people are also lost. They have a hard time finding this person who they really want to make an effort for. I think that’s okay for a while, for a period of time, but there’s also very much beauty in committing to one person. But again the beauty fades away the moment it is forced. So you need to find your way in the middle of those two opposites. Everything is about balance.”
– Tamino interviewed for Lioumness Magazine, October 2018 (x)
18 notes
·
View notes
Text
Omg I thought I deleted the request that I'm almost done writing I was gonna go y nehel bou Tumblr tah khra koul lioum un problème and then go on a hiatus lmao
2 notes
·
View notes
Video
vimeo
Le Corps Poreux from Sofia El Khyari on Vimeo.
"Le Corps Poreux" (The Porous Body) A young woman who lives in her thoughts goes back to the sea to centre herself. As she dives into the water, she dives under her skin and penetrates her psychological wrapping.
________________________________
Festivals:
- Animfest, Athens (Greece) >> 2nd prize, experimental film category - Ajayu Animation Film festival (Peru) >> Special mention for best mixed techniques film
- Cinanima, Espinho (Portugal) - Zlin Festival (Czek Republic) - Animateka, Ljubljana (Slovenia) - China International Independent Forum (China) - Medusa Underground Film Festival, Las Vegas (USA) - London Experimental film festival (UK) - Tetouan Student Film Festival (Morocco) - Festival international du court métrage d’animation de Meknès (Morocco) - BoVi Film Festival, Boise, Idaho (USA) - Imaginaria Film Festival, Conversano (Italy) - Go Girls (Italy) - Festival du Film d’Animation de Paris (France) - Les Femmes Underground Film Festival, Los Angeles (USA) - Festival du Film Court en Armagnac, Condom (France) - Un festival c'est trop court, Nice (France) - ZEBRA Poetry Film Festival, Berlin (Germany) - Mumia Underground World Animation Festival - Belo Horizonte (Brazil) - Online African Film Festival (online) - Festival international d'animation de Palm Springs (USA) - Flip Book Film Festival (Macedonia) - Feminist Border Arts Film Festival (USA) - Animatricks Animation Film Festival (Finland) - AnimaFest Gandsk (Poland) - Animarte (Brazil)
________________________________
Pres ENG: zippyframes.com/index.php/shorts/the-porous-body-sofia-el-khyari
skwigly.co.uk/showcase/le-corps-poreux-the-porous-body/
motionographer.com/quickie/sofia-el-khyari-le-corps-poreux/
Press FR: cinewax.org/blogs/media/le-corps-poreux-de-sofia-el-khyari-jeune-realisatrice-marocaine
karoo.me/cinema/oaff-2019-traces-imaginaires-dans-un-labyrinthe-de-glace
lioumness-magazine.com/blog/le-corps-poreux-le-court-mtrage-danimation-de-sofia-el-khyari-vido?fbclid=IwAR0ZCjM_QDrQNhkOMoOQiX5JC64i9vQRUk7_qvFWFuqeaR92Ib3zuFXXn0U
Press ESP: elemmental.com/2021/05/03/the-porous-body-2018-un-viaje-de-autodescubrimiento/?fbclid=IwAR2iH4wmSGabjgyFQQFjTZYXXbgrpVgcSCl_kknwrqbzm5UezD6Btpatwgs
animacionparaadultos.es/2018-le-corps-poreux/
________________________________
Credits :
Actress : Marta Reis Andrade DOP: Aadhar Gupta Lighting : Sam Robinson Camera assistant : Dina Shour Sound: Luke Elliott Music : Anna Katherina Bauer Additional animation & coloring : Ala Nunu Leszynska, Hakim Ismail, Matthias Cuciniello, Alix Bortoli, Lisa Cruz, Laura Nasir-Tamara, Yearin Lee, Marta Reis Andrade, Diana ilies, Despoina Skalimi Colorgrading: Liz Glennard Compositing : Fred Tschepp
Production : Royal College of Art Distribution : Pentacle Productions & Mikhal Bak
Biiig special thanks also to : Lisa Cruz, Mariana Aquino, Max and Ughur, Ali Ashman, Dimitris Armenakis, Kiah Liwag, Alex Blakemore, Nitima and Oum Al Fadl, Anna Ferreira de Lima, Jess, Emily and Celina, Aleksandra Kruse, Joe King and RCA tutors
1 note
·
View note
Photo
17/02/26 #mobilogyquestioningtheusual #cazaa @bmkhalife #lioumness #encore+ #concert #zinebandressarraki
0 notes
Photo
Hated the Turks as sheepskin-clad barbarians
Malek was a man of energy and ability, and a master of the art of keeping one part of his dominions in order by means of the inhabitants of another. The Arabs, who despised and hated the Turks as sheepskin-clad barbarians, were yet compelled to admit not only the power but the desire for knowledge and the appreciation of science which Malek showed. The country over which he ruled has long been in the most complete anarchy, and it is difficult to conceive that about the eleventh century the strongest power in the world had there its seat.
The Seljukian empire, however, broke up on the death of Malek, which took place in 1092, and, after a period of civil war, was divided into four parts. During the half-century which followed the death of Malek it again for a little time flashed into fame under Sandjian, who won renown in the East as the second Alexander; but though the Seljukians maintained themselves for some time longer in Syria, and gave trouble to the Crusaders, the steadfast and able opposition of the empire prevented any sultan being able to reconstruct the empire of Malek.
Dominions of the Roman empire
The only one of the divisions into which the empire split Seijnkinn era- UP on the death of Malek with which I am con- pne divided. ccrne(j js that which was carved out of the dominions of the Roman empire, and of which the capital was, for the most part, at Ieonium, a city which to-day, under the name of Konich, retains somewhat of a sacred character among the Turks balkan tours, because of its connection with the first sultans who obtained the right to be caliphs. Sultan Malek, eighteen years before his death, had prevented a quarrel with Suliman, his cousin, by consenting to allow him to be sultan of the Seljuks in the lands of the Christian empire.
With Suliman there begins the famous line of robber chiefs snunns of who are known as Seljnkian Sultans of Koine or lioum. Koum, or as Sultans of Iconium. Suliinan made himself entirely independent of the Grand Sultan, Malek Shah. Hitherto the policy of the Turks in their conquests of Asia Minor had been one of simple destruction.
Finlay goes so far as to say that their object was to depopulate the country to such an extent as would admit the establishment of permanent nomad encampments in the midst of uncultivated plains far within the frontiers of the empire. The history of the dealings of the Turks with Asia Minor had, at any rate, been such as would have been compatible with the existence of this intention. A long series of raids had been made, which had resulted first in the depopulation of the border states, and then in the impoverishment of the imperial provinces.
Turcomans and the Moslem Kurds
What the Turcomans and the Moslem Kurds have been doin£r in Armenia under the rule of the Ottoman Turks during the last fifty years, the Seljukian Turks did during the century between 1050 and 1150, but with this difference, that the latter were in greater numbers, and had an irresistible number of men behind them. The result of each raid was the weakening of the empire, which was the representative to the Turk of Christian power. The great inducement of those who took part in these raids was the large amount of plunder which could be obtained from the wealthy inhabitants while fighting the battles of Islam.
Either from the spirit of wanton destruction, or to make sure of their plunder and to prepare their way for subsequent raids, they burned or otherwise de-stroyed the first towns and villages which they captured. As they progressed farther into the interior of Asia Minor they began to rear their tents on the lands they had devastated. The Christian inhabitants were driven into the cities, or, if they submitted, were made rayalis and treated as serfs.
They against him, and were in communication with the capital by the great Roman roads, so long as there was a hostile agricultural population which could not be absolutely destroyed, so long would it be impossible for his nomads to maintain possession of the territory which they had conquered. He They ally therefore determined to declare for the tenants of with peat3 the lands against their lords. The Byzantine nobles abut, claimed rights over the village communities which cultivated the lands, as part proprietors with them. Sometimes these nobles held their lands on a tenure which Englishmen would call fee simple, and had them cultivated by slaves or serfs, or by both.
0 notes
Photo
Hated the Turks as sheepskin-clad barbarians
Malek was a man of energy and ability, and a master of the art of keeping one part of his dominions in order by means of the inhabitants of another. The Arabs, who despised and hated the Turks as sheepskin-clad barbarians, were yet compelled to admit not only the power but the desire for knowledge and the appreciation of science which Malek showed. The country over which he ruled has long been in the most complete anarchy, and it is difficult to conceive that about the eleventh century the strongest power in the world had there its seat.
The Seljukian empire, however, broke up on the death of Malek, which took place in 1092, and, after a period of civil war, was divided into four parts. During the half-century which followed the death of Malek it again for a little time flashed into fame under Sandjian, who won renown in the East as the second Alexander; but though the Seljukians maintained themselves for some time longer in Syria, and gave trouble to the Crusaders, the steadfast and able opposition of the empire prevented any sultan being able to reconstruct the empire of Malek.
Dominions of the Roman empire
The only one of the divisions into which the empire split Seijnkinn era- UP on the death of Malek with which I am con- pne divided. ccrne(j js that which was carved out of the dominions of the Roman empire, and of which the capital was, for the most part, at Ieonium, a city which to-day, under the name of Konich, retains somewhat of a sacred character among the Turks balkan tours, because of its connection with the first sultans who obtained the right to be caliphs. Sultan Malek, eighteen years before his death, had prevented a quarrel with Suliman, his cousin, by consenting to allow him to be sultan of the Seljuks in the lands of the Christian empire.
With Suliman there begins the famous line of robber chiefs snunns of who are known as Seljnkian Sultans of Koine or lioum. Koum, or as Sultans of Iconium. Suliinan made himself entirely independent of the Grand Sultan, Malek Shah. Hitherto the policy of the Turks in their conquests of Asia Minor had been one of simple destruction.
Finlay goes so far as to say that their object was to depopulate the country to such an extent as would admit the establishment of permanent nomad encampments in the midst of uncultivated plains far within the frontiers of the empire. The history of the dealings of the Turks with Asia Minor had, at any rate, been such as would have been compatible with the existence of this intention. A long series of raids had been made, which had resulted first in the depopulation of the border states, and then in the impoverishment of the imperial provinces.
Turcomans and the Moslem Kurds
What the Turcomans and the Moslem Kurds have been doin£r in Armenia under the rule of the Ottoman Turks during the last fifty years, the Seljukian Turks did during the century between 1050 and 1150, but with this difference, that the latter were in greater numbers, and had an irresistible number of men behind them. The result of each raid was the weakening of the empire, which was the representative to the Turk of Christian power. The great inducement of those who took part in these raids was the large amount of plunder which could be obtained from the wealthy inhabitants while fighting the battles of Islam.
Either from the spirit of wanton destruction, or to make sure of their plunder and to prepare their way for subsequent raids, they burned or otherwise de-stroyed the first towns and villages which they captured. As they progressed farther into the interior of Asia Minor they began to rear their tents on the lands they had devastated. The Christian inhabitants were driven into the cities, or, if they submitted, were made rayalis and treated as serfs.
They against him, and were in communication with the capital by the great Roman roads, so long as there was a hostile agricultural population which could not be absolutely destroyed, so long would it be impossible for his nomads to maintain possession of the territory which they had conquered. He They ally therefore determined to declare for the tenants of with peat3 the lands against their lords. The Byzantine nobles abut, claimed rights over the village communities which cultivated the lands, as part proprietors with them. Sometimes these nobles held their lands on a tenure which Englishmen would call fee simple, and had them cultivated by slaves or serfs, or by both.
0 notes
Photo
Hated the Turks as sheepskin-clad barbarians
Malek was a man of energy and ability, and a master of the art of keeping one part of his dominions in order by means of the inhabitants of another. The Arabs, who despised and hated the Turks as sheepskin-clad barbarians, were yet compelled to admit not only the power but the desire for knowledge and the appreciation of science which Malek showed. The country over which he ruled has long been in the most complete anarchy, and it is difficult to conceive that about the eleventh century the strongest power in the world had there its seat.
The Seljukian empire, however, broke up on the death of Malek, which took place in 1092, and, after a period of civil war, was divided into four parts. During the half-century which followed the death of Malek it again for a little time flashed into fame under Sandjian, who won renown in the East as the second Alexander; but though the Seljukians maintained themselves for some time longer in Syria, and gave trouble to the Crusaders, the steadfast and able opposition of the empire prevented any sultan being able to reconstruct the empire of Malek.
Dominions of the Roman empire
The only one of the divisions into which the empire split Seijnkinn era- UP on the death of Malek with which I am con- pne divided. ccrne(j js that which was carved out of the dominions of the Roman empire, and of which the capital was, for the most part, at Ieonium, a city which to-day, under the name of Konich, retains somewhat of a sacred character among the Turks balkan tours, because of its connection with the first sultans who obtained the right to be caliphs. Sultan Malek, eighteen years before his death, had prevented a quarrel with Suliman, his cousin, by consenting to allow him to be sultan of the Seljuks in the lands of the Christian empire.
With Suliman there begins the famous line of robber chiefs snunns of who are known as Seljnkian Sultans of Koine or lioum. Koum, or as Sultans of Iconium. Suliinan made himself entirely independent of the Grand Sultan, Malek Shah. Hitherto the policy of the Turks in their conquests of Asia Minor had been one of simple destruction.
Finlay goes so far as to say that their object was to depopulate the country to such an extent as would admit the establishment of permanent nomad encampments in the midst of uncultivated plains far within the frontiers of the empire. The history of the dealings of the Turks with Asia Minor had, at any rate, been such as would have been compatible with the existence of this intention. A long series of raids had been made, which had resulted first in the depopulation of the border states, and then in the impoverishment of the imperial provinces.
Turcomans and the Moslem Kurds
What the Turcomans and the Moslem Kurds have been doin£r in Armenia under the rule of the Ottoman Turks during the last fifty years, the Seljukian Turks did during the century between 1050 and 1150, but with this difference, that the latter were in greater numbers, and had an irresistible number of men behind them. The result of each raid was the weakening of the empire, which was the representative to the Turk of Christian power. The great inducement of those who took part in these raids was the large amount of plunder which could be obtained from the wealthy inhabitants while fighting the battles of Islam.
Either from the spirit of wanton destruction, or to make sure of their plunder and to prepare their way for subsequent raids, they burned or otherwise de-stroyed the first towns and villages which they captured. As they progressed farther into the interior of Asia Minor they began to rear their tents on the lands they had devastated. The Christian inhabitants were driven into the cities, or, if they submitted, were made rayalis and treated as serfs.
They against him, and were in communication with the capital by the great Roman roads, so long as there was a hostile agricultural population which could not be absolutely destroyed, so long would it be impossible for his nomads to maintain possession of the territory which they had conquered. He They ally therefore determined to declare for the tenants of with peat3 the lands against their lords. The Byzantine nobles abut, claimed rights over the village communities which cultivated the lands, as part proprietors with them. Sometimes these nobles held their lands on a tenure which Englishmen would call fee simple, and had them cultivated by slaves or serfs, or by both.
0 notes
Photo
Hated the Turks as sheepskin-clad barbarians
Malek was a man of energy and ability, and a master of the art of keeping one part of his dominions in order by means of the inhabitants of another. The Arabs, who despised and hated the Turks as sheepskin-clad barbarians, were yet compelled to admit not only the power but the desire for knowledge and the appreciation of science which Malek showed. The country over which he ruled has long been in the most complete anarchy, and it is difficult to conceive that about the eleventh century the strongest power in the world had there its seat.
The Seljukian empire, however, broke up on the death of Malek, which took place in 1092, and, after a period of civil war, was divided into four parts. During the half-century which followed the death of Malek it again for a little time flashed into fame under Sandjian, who won renown in the East as the second Alexander; but though the Seljukians maintained themselves for some time longer in Syria, and gave trouble to the Crusaders, the steadfast and able opposition of the empire prevented any sultan being able to reconstruct the empire of Malek.
Dominions of the Roman empire
The only one of the divisions into which the empire split Seijnkinn era- UP on the death of Malek with which I am con- pne divided. ccrne(j js that which was carved out of the dominions of the Roman empire, and of which the capital was, for the most part, at Ieonium, a city which to-day, under the name of Konich, retains somewhat of a sacred character among the Turks balkan tours, because of its connection with the first sultans who obtained the right to be caliphs. Sultan Malek, eighteen years before his death, had prevented a quarrel with Suliman, his cousin, by consenting to allow him to be sultan of the Seljuks in the lands of the Christian empire.
With Suliman there begins the famous line of robber chiefs snunns of who are known as Seljnkian Sultans of Koine or lioum. Koum, or as Sultans of Iconium. Suliinan made himself entirely independent of the Grand Sultan, Malek Shah. Hitherto the policy of the Turks in their conquests of Asia Minor had been one of simple destruction.
Finlay goes so far as to say that their object was to depopulate the country to such an extent as would admit the establishment of permanent nomad encampments in the midst of uncultivated plains far within the frontiers of the empire. The history of the dealings of the Turks with Asia Minor had, at any rate, been such as would have been compatible with the existence of this intention. A long series of raids had been made, which had resulted first in the depopulation of the border states, and then in the impoverishment of the imperial provinces.
Turcomans and the Moslem Kurds
What the Turcomans and the Moslem Kurds have been doin£r in Armenia under the rule of the Ottoman Turks during the last fifty years, the Seljukian Turks did during the century between 1050 and 1150, but with this difference, that the latter were in greater numbers, and had an irresistible number of men behind them. The result of each raid was the weakening of the empire, which was the representative to the Turk of Christian power. The great inducement of those who took part in these raids was the large amount of plunder which could be obtained from the wealthy inhabitants while fighting the battles of Islam.
Either from the spirit of wanton destruction, or to make sure of their plunder and to prepare their way for subsequent raids, they burned or otherwise de-stroyed the first towns and villages which they captured. As they progressed farther into the interior of Asia Minor they began to rear their tents on the lands they had devastated. The Christian inhabitants were driven into the cities, or, if they submitted, were made rayalis and treated as serfs.
They against him, and were in communication with the capital by the great Roman roads, so long as there was a hostile agricultural population which could not be absolutely destroyed, so long would it be impossible for his nomads to maintain possession of the territory which they had conquered. He They ally therefore determined to declare for the tenants of with peat3 the lands against their lords. The Byzantine nobles abut, claimed rights over the village communities which cultivated the lands, as part proprietors with them. Sometimes these nobles held their lands on a tenure which Englishmen would call fee simple, and had them cultivated by slaves or serfs, or by both.
0 notes
Text
LIOUMTUBE
THE TRACK YOU CURRENTLY LISTEN ON REPEAT TO?
Donnie & Joe Emerson -- Baby. They’re two brothers who recorded an album on their farm in America and they were never signed nor did they ever sell anything. And forty years later someone discovered them and it’s really beautiful.
THE SONG YOU LISTENED TO THE MOST IN YOUR LIFE?
Probably Imagine by John Lennon.
THE SONG YOU LIKE LISTENING TO WHEN YOU WAKE UP IN THE MORNING?
No music in the morning!
THE ONE THAT ROCK YOU TO SLEEP?
Grouper -- Call Across Rooms.
THE SONG YOU LIKE LISTENING TO ON THE ROAD?
Just a bunch of Bob Dylan stuff.
THE ARABIC SONG THAT INSPIRES YOU?
I love Hamza El Din, he’s actually Nubian, but I’d go with Hela Lisa. And then maybe Kelmet Etab by Farid Al-Atrash.
YOUR FEEL-GOOD SONG?
It’s gonna be a sad song. I really believe that if you embrace your sadness and melancholy, you end up happier. If you hide it away, it’s not good for you. Lee Hazelwood -- For One Moment.
THE ONE THAT MAKES YOU WANT TO DANCE?
Brockhampton -- Gold
THE SONG THAT BRING TEARS TO YOUR EYES?
So many! I have to pick the right one. Radiohead -- Daydreaming.
YOUR GUILTY SONG?
I only know good ones, haha! Maybe some Justin Bieber or an Ed Sheeran ballad. Actually I’ve often said that Britney Spears’ Toxic is a very good pop song. But it’s so good that it’s no even a guilty pleasure...
-- Tamino interviewed for Lioumness Magazine, October 2018 (x)
#tamino#playlist#lioumness#promo: amir#interview: english#interview: 2018#press: 2018#2018#edit: i tried to link official channels but not all of them have one
12 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Hated the Turks as sheepskin-clad barbarians
Malek was a man of energy and ability, and a master of the art of keeping one part of his dominions in order by means of the inhabitants of another. The Arabs, who despised and hated the Turks as sheepskin-clad barbarians, were yet compelled to admit not only the power but the desire for knowledge and the appreciation of science which Malek showed. The country over which he ruled has long been in the most complete anarchy, and it is difficult to conceive that about the eleventh century the strongest power in the world had there its seat.
The Seljukian empire, however, broke up on the death of Malek, which took place in 1092, and, after a period of civil war, was divided into four parts. During the half-century which followed the death of Malek it again for a little time flashed into fame under Sandjian, who won renown in the East as the second Alexander; but though the Seljukians maintained themselves for some time longer in Syria, and gave trouble to the Crusaders, the steadfast and able opposition of the empire prevented any sultan being able to reconstruct the empire of Malek.
Dominions of the Roman empire
The only one of the divisions into which the empire split Seijnkinn era- UP on the death of Malek with which I am con- pne divided. ccrne(j js that which was carved out of the dominions of the Roman empire, and of which the capital was, for the most part, at Ieonium, a city which to-day, under the name of Konich, retains somewhat of a sacred character among the Turks balkan tours, because of its connection with the first sultans who obtained the right to be caliphs. Sultan Malek, eighteen years before his death, had prevented a quarrel with Suliman, his cousin, by consenting to allow him to be sultan of the Seljuks in the lands of the Christian empire.
With Suliman there begins the famous line of robber chiefs snunns of who are known as Seljnkian Sultans of Koine or lioum. Koum, or as Sultans of Iconium. Suliinan made himself entirely independent of the Grand Sultan, Malek Shah. Hitherto the policy of the Turks in their conquests of Asia Minor had been one of simple destruction.
Finlay goes so far as to say that their object was to depopulate the country to such an extent as would admit the establishment of permanent nomad encampments in the midst of uncultivated plains far within the frontiers of the empire. The history of the dealings of the Turks with Asia Minor had, at any rate, been such as would have been compatible with the existence of this intention. A long series of raids had been made, which had resulted first in the depopulation of the border states, and then in the impoverishment of the imperial provinces.
Turcomans and the Moslem Kurds
What the Turcomans and the Moslem Kurds have been doin£r in Armenia under the rule of the Ottoman Turks during the last fifty years, the Seljukian Turks did during the century between 1050 and 1150, but with this difference, that the latter were in greater numbers, and had an irresistible number of men behind them. The result of each raid was the weakening of the empire, which was the representative to the Turk of Christian power. The great inducement of those who took part in these raids was the large amount of plunder which could be obtained from the wealthy inhabitants while fighting the battles of Islam.
Either from the spirit of wanton destruction, or to make sure of their plunder and to prepare their way for subsequent raids, they burned or otherwise de-stroyed the first towns and villages which they captured. As they progressed farther into the interior of Asia Minor they began to rear their tents on the lands they had devastated. The Christian inhabitants were driven into the cities, or, if they submitted, were made rayalis and treated as serfs.
They against him, and were in communication with the capital by the great Roman roads, so long as there was a hostile agricultural population which could not be absolutely destroyed, so long would it be impossible for his nomads to maintain possession of the territory which they had conquered. He They ally therefore determined to declare for the tenants of with peat3 the lands against their lords. The Byzantine nobles abut, claimed rights over the village communities which cultivated the lands, as part proprietors with them. Sometimes these nobles held their lands on a tenure which Englishmen would call fee simple, and had them cultivated by slaves or serfs, or by both.
0 notes
Photo
Hated the Turks as sheepskin-clad barbarians
Malek was a man of energy and ability, and a master of the art of keeping one part of his dominions in order by means of the inhabitants of another. The Arabs, who despised and hated the Turks as sheepskin-clad barbarians, were yet compelled to admit not only the power but the desire for knowledge and the appreciation of science which Malek showed. The country over which he ruled has long been in the most complete anarchy, and it is difficult to conceive that about the eleventh century the strongest power in the world had there its seat.
The Seljukian empire, however, broke up on the death of Malek, which took place in 1092, and, after a period of civil war, was divided into four parts. During the half-century which followed the death of Malek it again for a little time flashed into fame under Sandjian, who won renown in the East as the second Alexander; but though the Seljukians maintained themselves for some time longer in Syria, and gave trouble to the Crusaders, the steadfast and able opposition of the empire prevented any sultan being able to reconstruct the empire of Malek.
Dominions of the Roman empire
The only one of the divisions into which the empire split Seijnkinn era- UP on the death of Malek with which I am con- pne divided. ccrne(j js that which was carved out of the dominions of the Roman empire, and of which the capital was, for the most part, at Ieonium, a city which to-day, under the name of Konich, retains somewhat of a sacred character among the Turks balkan tours, because of its connection with the first sultans who obtained the right to be caliphs. Sultan Malek, eighteen years before his death, had prevented a quarrel with Suliman, his cousin, by consenting to allow him to be sultan of the Seljuks in the lands of the Christian empire.
With Suliman there begins the famous line of robber chiefs snunns of who are known as Seljnkian Sultans of Koine or lioum. Koum, or as Sultans of Iconium. Suliinan made himself entirely independent of the Grand Sultan, Malek Shah. Hitherto the policy of the Turks in their conquests of Asia Minor had been one of simple destruction.
Finlay goes so far as to say that their object was to depopulate the country to such an extent as would admit the establishment of permanent nomad encampments in the midst of uncultivated plains far within the frontiers of the empire. The history of the dealings of the Turks with Asia Minor had, at any rate, been such as would have been compatible with the existence of this intention. A long series of raids had been made, which had resulted first in the depopulation of the border states, and then in the impoverishment of the imperial provinces.
Turcomans and the Moslem Kurds
What the Turcomans and the Moslem Kurds have been doin£r in Armenia under the rule of the Ottoman Turks during the last fifty years, the Seljukian Turks did during the century between 1050 and 1150, but with this difference, that the latter were in greater numbers, and had an irresistible number of men behind them. The result of each raid was the weakening of the empire, which was the representative to the Turk of Christian power. The great inducement of those who took part in these raids was the large amount of plunder which could be obtained from the wealthy inhabitants while fighting the battles of Islam.
Either from the spirit of wanton destruction, or to make sure of their plunder and to prepare their way for subsequent raids, they burned or otherwise de-stroyed the first towns and villages which they captured. As they progressed farther into the interior of Asia Minor they began to rear their tents on the lands they had devastated. The Christian inhabitants were driven into the cities, or, if they submitted, were made rayalis and treated as serfs.
They against him, and were in communication with the capital by the great Roman roads, so long as there was a hostile agricultural population which could not be absolutely destroyed, so long would it be impossible for his nomads to maintain possession of the territory which they had conquered. He They ally therefore determined to declare for the tenants of with peat3 the lands against their lords. The Byzantine nobles abut, claimed rights over the village communities which cultivated the lands, as part proprietors with them. Sometimes these nobles held their lands on a tenure which Englishmen would call fee simple, and had them cultivated by slaves or serfs, or by both.
0 notes
Photo
17/02/26 #mobilogyquestioningtheusual #cazaa @bmkhalife #lioumness #encore+ #concert #zinebandressarraki
0 notes
Photo
Hated the Turks as sheepskin-clad barbarians
Malek was a man of energy and ability, and a master of the art of keeping one part of his dominions in order by means of the inhabitants of another. The Arabs, who despised and hated the Turks as sheepskin-clad barbarians, were yet compelled to admit not only the power but the desire for knowledge and the appreciation of science which Malek showed. The country over which he ruled has long been in the most complete anarchy, and it is difficult to conceive that about the eleventh century the strongest power in the world had there its seat.
The Seljukian empire, however, broke up on the death of Malek, which took place in 1092, and, after a period of civil war, was divided into four parts. During the half-century which followed the death of Malek it again for a little time flashed into fame under Sandjian, who won renown in the East as the second Alexander; but though the Seljukians maintained themselves for some time longer in Syria, and gave trouble to the Crusaders, the steadfast and able opposition of the empire prevented any sultan being able to reconstruct the empire of Malek.
Dominions of the Roman empire
The only one of the divisions into which the empire split Seijnkinn era- UP on the death of Malek with which I am con- pne divided. ccrne(j js that which was carved out of the dominions of the Roman empire, and of which the capital was, for the most part, at Ieonium, a city which to-day, under the name of Konich, retains somewhat of a sacred character among the Turks balkan tours, because of its connection with the first sultans who obtained the right to be caliphs. Sultan Malek, eighteen years before his death, had prevented a quarrel with Suliman, his cousin, by consenting to allow him to be sultan of the Seljuks in the lands of the Christian empire.
With Suliman there begins the famous line of robber chiefs snunns of who are known as Seljnkian Sultans of Koine or lioum. Koum, or as Sultans of Iconium. Suliinan made himself entirely independent of the Grand Sultan, Malek Shah. Hitherto the policy of the Turks in their conquests of Asia Minor had been one of simple destruction.
Finlay goes so far as to say that their object was to depopulate the country to such an extent as would admit the establishment of permanent nomad encampments in the midst of uncultivated plains far within the frontiers of the empire. The history of the dealings of the Turks with Asia Minor had, at any rate, been such as would have been compatible with the existence of this intention. A long series of raids had been made, which had resulted first in the depopulation of the border states, and then in the impoverishment of the imperial provinces.
Turcomans and the Moslem Kurds
What the Turcomans and the Moslem Kurds have been doin£r in Armenia under the rule of the Ottoman Turks during the last fifty years, the Seljukian Turks did during the century between 1050 and 1150, but with this difference, that the latter were in greater numbers, and had an irresistible number of men behind them. The result of each raid was the weakening of the empire, which was the representative to the Turk of Christian power. The great inducement of those who took part in these raids was the large amount of plunder which could be obtained from the wealthy inhabitants while fighting the battles of Islam.
Either from the spirit of wanton destruction, or to make sure of their plunder and to prepare their way for subsequent raids, they burned or otherwise de-stroyed the first towns and villages which they captured. As they progressed farther into the interior of Asia Minor they began to rear their tents on the lands they had devastated. The Christian inhabitants were driven into the cities, or, if they submitted, were made rayalis and treated as serfs.
They against him, and were in communication with the capital by the great Roman roads, so long as there was a hostile agricultural population which could not be absolutely destroyed, so long would it be impossible for his nomads to maintain possession of the territory which they had conquered. He They ally therefore determined to declare for the tenants of with peat3 the lands against their lords. The Byzantine nobles abut, claimed rights over the village communities which cultivated the lands, as part proprietors with them. Sometimes these nobles held their lands on a tenure which Englishmen would call fee simple, and had them cultivated by slaves or serfs, or by both.
0 notes
Photo
Hated the Turks as sheepskin-clad barbarians
Malek was a man of energy and ability, and a master of the art of keeping one part of his dominions in order by means of the inhabitants of another. The Arabs, who despised and hated the Turks as sheepskin-clad barbarians, were yet compelled to admit not only the power but the desire for knowledge and the appreciation of science which Malek showed. The country over which he ruled has long been in the most complete anarchy, and it is difficult to conceive that about the eleventh century the strongest power in the world had there its seat.
The Seljukian empire, however, broke up on the death of Malek, which took place in 1092, and, after a period of civil war, was divided into four parts. During the half-century which followed the death of Malek it again for a little time flashed into fame under Sandjian, who won renown in the East as the second Alexander; but though the Seljukians maintained themselves for some time longer in Syria, and gave trouble to the Crusaders, the steadfast and able opposition of the empire prevented any sultan being able to reconstruct the empire of Malek.
Dominions of the Roman empire
The only one of the divisions into which the empire split Seijnkinn era- UP on the death of Malek with which I am con- pne divided. ccrne(j js that which was carved out of the dominions of the Roman empire, and of which the capital was, for the most part, at Ieonium, a city which to-day, under the name of Konich, retains somewhat of a sacred character among the Turks balkan tours, because of its connection with the first sultans who obtained the right to be caliphs. Sultan Malek, eighteen years before his death, had prevented a quarrel with Suliman, his cousin, by consenting to allow him to be sultan of the Seljuks in the lands of the Christian empire.
With Suliman there begins the famous line of robber chiefs snunns of who are known as Seljnkian Sultans of Koine or lioum. Koum, or as Sultans of Iconium. Suliinan made himself entirely independent of the Grand Sultan, Malek Shah. Hitherto the policy of the Turks in their conquests of Asia Minor had been one of simple destruction.
Finlay goes so far as to say that their object was to depopulate the country to such an extent as would admit the establishment of permanent nomad encampments in the midst of uncultivated plains far within the frontiers of the empire. The history of the dealings of the Turks with Asia Minor had, at any rate, been such as would have been compatible with the existence of this intention. A long series of raids had been made, which had resulted first in the depopulation of the border states, and then in the impoverishment of the imperial provinces.
Turcomans and the Moslem Kurds
What the Turcomans and the Moslem Kurds have been doin£r in Armenia under the rule of the Ottoman Turks during the last fifty years, the Seljukian Turks did during the century between 1050 and 1150, but with this difference, that the latter were in greater numbers, and had an irresistible number of men behind them. The result of each raid was the weakening of the empire, which was the representative to the Turk of Christian power. The great inducement of those who took part in these raids was the large amount of plunder which could be obtained from the wealthy inhabitants while fighting the battles of Islam.
Either from the spirit of wanton destruction, or to make sure of their plunder and to prepare their way for subsequent raids, they burned or otherwise de-stroyed the first towns and villages which they captured. As they progressed farther into the interior of Asia Minor they began to rear their tents on the lands they had devastated. The Christian inhabitants were driven into the cities, or, if they submitted, were made rayalis and treated as serfs.
They against him, and were in communication with the capital by the great Roman roads, so long as there was a hostile agricultural population which could not be absolutely destroyed, so long would it be impossible for his nomads to maintain possession of the territory which they had conquered. He They ally therefore determined to declare for the tenants of with peat3 the lands against their lords. The Byzantine nobles abut, claimed rights over the village communities which cultivated the lands, as part proprietors with them. Sometimes these nobles held their lands on a tenure which Englishmen would call fee simple, and had them cultivated by slaves or serfs, or by both.
0 notes