#like my main opinion on the portrait is: stop trying to make king charles happen. it's not gonna happen
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Note
thats not leaking blood the colours are just a little stylized 😭 i cant be the only person who genuinely likes that portrait
I said if u squint it looks that way, I understand that it's not the intention bud. And ur probably not the only one but it's certainly a niche opinion. Like I've been racking my brain to think of reasons the artist might want to make it look like he was painting on a meat canvas and none of them are particularly flattering to ol king chuck. The artist wanted the military uniform to fade into the background to bring the man himself into better focus and humanise him. Which. yeah trying to cover over their violent history by humanising themselves is certainly what the royal family are going for these days so shoutout to the artist for getting the assignment ig lmao. And the one fucking incongruous butterfly that was apparently Charles' idea really gets me
Anyway no royal portrait was gonna work for me, in the same way that I'd be pissed if my landlord was like "hey look what I spent ur rent money on" and it was a fuckin statue of themselves, yk? Royal portraits in general are flimsy fuckin propaganda that waste our damn money, and this one is no different to me, it's just a more self-serving version
#apologies for the shinigami eyes link. it's a guardian article#like the look of the painting is kind of neither here nor there to me. like it's a weird choice but I'd hate it either way#looking at ur tags I can't disagree that it's an accurate representation of the man#it was also queen camilla's impression of the portrait apparently. like yea that's definitely him#like yea there's a lot of technical skill on display. obviously. they're royalty. they can afford the best in the business#it's just high quality art in service of a useless subject#and like I said there are some real negative ways that an anti-monarchist like myself can read the artistic choices made#I'm not convinced that he's not on our side lmao#and who's paying for this portrait? the taxpayers? during a cost of living crisis? or is it cash from the duchy he inherited#or is it leftover money from his fuckin tax dodge#like my main opinion on the portrait is: stop trying to make king charles happen. it's not gonna happen#the way the media has desperately tried to get charles the same affection as the queen is pathetic#british monarchy abolished in my lifetime let's make it happen
14 notes
·
View notes
Text
Princes William and Harry are all grown up, and their mother would be proud
By Karla Adam and William Booth, Washington Post, August 28, 2017
LONDON--Princes William and Harry are good lads--and either would make a proper 21st-century king. Given all that has happened, that is amazing.
On the 20th anniversary of the death of the People’s Princess, the British people have reached a consensus: Diana raised two relatively normal, capable, flawed but decent, and maybe even exceptional sons, under extraordinary circumstances.
That one of them, Harry, once dressed up as a Nazi is mostly forgotten. That the other, William, is a little dull is okay.
All eyes are now on the next generation of royals as the world remembers the strange and unsettling tabloid days surrounding the death of Diana, killed in a spectacularly reckless car crash in a Paris tunnel on Aug. 31, 1997.
William was 15 then; Harry was 12. That they were young and that it was heartbreaking escaped no one. Billions watched the televised reports that day, one of the largest global audiences ever assembled.
Since then, the pair has done well. To recap, the princes got through their teens and survived their roaring 20s without fatal embarrassments.
There was plenty of partying--and some jousting with paparazzi outside night clubs. But both served honorably in the military, which was applauded by the British public.
William worked as a pilot for the East Anglian Air Ambulance until last month. He had a day job. His crew saved lives.
Harry served as an Apache attack helicopter pilot in Afghanistan. Two tours. He got high marks for trying hard not to draw too much attention to himself. Or as the Sun put it in a tabloid headline, “From wild nights to fire fights: How Prince Harry became a man.”
Once dubbed the Party Prince, the ginger-haired bachelor Harry has settled down, a bit. He is now dating the American actress Meghan Markle. He understands your interest, but issued a statement through his Kensington Palace spokesman to back off.
These days, William and Harry are busy promoting charities that seek to help AIDS sufferers and disabled veterans. And most remarkably, they are speaking out on the stigma surrounding mental health challenges--by discussing their own, and by extension, very delicately, their mother’s struggles. She suffered from depression and bulimia.
None of this was guaranteed, not at all.
That neither prince became a punchline, an afterthought or train wreck--growing up in the selfie age under the all-seeing eye of the most unforgiving tabloid culture on earth--is remarkable.
Their parents, Charles and Diana, had a deeply unhappy public marriage with the most lurid details gracing the front pages of the world’s newspapers for years. The fascination continues today.
A documentary that aired on Britain’s Channel 4 two weeks ago generated news about how much sex--or not so much--Charles and Diana were having as their marriage cratered, mostly because Charles could not get over his one true love, Camilla Parker-Bowles, the Duchess of Cornwall, who he later married.
Although many might wish otherwise, the 68-year-old Charles will almost certainly be king when his mother, the 91-year-old Queen Elizabeth II, God save her, dies.
In Britain, at least now, Charles appears a kind of afterthought, a vintage image. The enduring moment of Diana’s funeral 20 years ago is not Charles but sons William and Harry, walking behind their mother’s flag-draped casket, their heads hung low as they shuffled forward through immense crowds of mourners, most silent, but some wailing, others nearly hysterical.
It was a “long and lonely walk,” said Prince William in a new BBC documentary “Diana, 7 Days,” one of several marking the 20th anniversary of Diana’s death. William said he tried to hide behind his floppy blond bangs, which were like a “safety blanket.”
Reflecting on it today, William says he had many roles to play that day--he was a grieving teenage son, yes, but he was also Prince William, the nation’s future king.
There was a balance, he said, “between me being Prince William and having to do my bit, versus the private William who just wanted to go into a room and cry, who’d lost his mother.”
Until recently, William and Harry haven’t spoken publicly like this about their mother and what it was like to cope with her loss at such an age.
It’s hard to overstate just how unusual it is, even in 2017, for the queen’s subjects to see the princes on the telly talking so openly about Diana.
Old-school British aristocrats are renowned for the stiff upper lip. The royals can be reserved to the point of hypoxia, in a mostly mute doggedness, viewed charitably as keeping calm and reigning on.
The queen has ruled for more than 65 years and she has given exactly zero interviews during her long reign.
But William says he felt now was an appropriate time to honor his mother’s memory. In the two documentaries, the princes paint a portrait of a fun-loving, cool mum who is dearly missed.
The princes light up when they talk about Diana playing pranks--from hiding candies in socks to sending rude cards to her sons at school to arranging supermodels to surprise William at their home.
“Our mother was a total kid, through and through,” Harry says in the HBO documentary “Diana, Our Mother: Her Life and Legacy.”
“One of her mottos to me was, ‘You can be as naughty as you want--just don’t get caught.’”
In 2012, Harry was photographed naked in Las Vegas during a game of strip poker. He didn’t really lose that hand.
Today, Harry, 32, lives in a cottage on the grounds of Kensington Palace.
In his post-army career, Harry founded the Invictus Games, a sporting event for disabled veterans. To help publicize it, he roped in the queen for a promotional video with the Obamas that went viral on Twitter.
Proving the royals have a sense of humor.
His older brother, William, second in line for succession after his father, Charles, is the less interesting one, with the thinning hair and the glamorous wife. He doesn’t have the same bad-boy allure as his brother, but he hasn’t fully escaped criticism from the news media.
“Work-shy William” is his nickname in some tabloids, upset that he hasn’t clocked up enough royal duty hours. “Throne idle” pocked one front-page headline in the Sun.
William defended himself against the jibes, saying that he was concentrating on being a good father, pilot and a royal. But he will soon be clocking up more duties in service of the realm.
William and Kate, both 35, recently packed up the fam--George, 4 and Charlotte, 2--and moved their main residence from Anmer Hall in Norfolk, a relatively secluded area in eastern England, to Kensington Palace in the bustling British capital. Prince George starts school this fall in Battersea, south London, a few miles from the family home.
Both William and Harry are now full-time royals, and as such carry out “engagements”--as they are called--on behalf of the queen, and draw attention to various charities.
The queen--“the boss” as William has called her--is still very much at the helm, but as she continues to gradually scale back her duties, the younger generations are taking on a greater role.
Commentators say that William may start to fill in some of the gaps left by his grandfather, Prince Philip, who recently hung up his royal cleats at age 96.
“In the closing years of her life, the queen and William will make a natural couple,” carrying out royal duties, said Robert Lacey, a royal biographer. He noted that the two have a similar style--reserved, cautious, calm--that contrasts with the more opinionated Prince Charles, the queen’s eldest son and first in line to the throne. In an interview with the BBC, William suggested he is more likely to rule in a manner similar to the queen.
Despite their recent openness, it’s widely reported that the princes loathe the media and William in particular comes across as guarded.
“William has to be more private. He’s the father of two young children and he doesn’t want a repetition of the abhorrent behavior of the media that chased his mother to her death,” said Jobson.
In the BBC documentary, William said that when he saw his mother crying, it was usually to do with something connected to the media. He said this took its toll on him and he found it difficult as a young boy who wanted to protect his mother from the paparazzi.
“And I mean a pack, like a pack of dogs, followed her, chased her, harassed her, called her names, spat at her, tried to get a reaction to get that photograph of her lashing out, get her upset,” said William.
Last year, Prince Harry fired his own salvo at the news media, condemning what he said was the media’s racist and sexist abuse of his girlfriend Meghan Markle, an American actress arguably best known for her role in the TV drama “Suits.” The princes have signaled they won’t be talking about Diana as much going forward, but don’t expect them to stop talking about the importance of expressing feelings.
“There may be a time and a place for the ‘stiff upper lip,’ William has said. “But not at the expense of your health.”
0 notes