#lead to confrontation. but if that is ooc or something contradicts that please do let me know!
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Note
RE: Corrupted!Ratio now I'm imagining Aventurine returning home from a business trip to all of this and immediately setting to work covering up Ratio's crimes like "DW I got you bbygirl also what the fuck is going on"
Cleaning up after his wife but... Aven knows something is deeply amiss oh... Oh.!
My god I feel sorry for Aventurine that I ever let C!Ratio loose. I think Aven would play a crucial part in getting him back to normal after he realizes what's going on.
But this also assumes there was an outside influence which got Ratio corrupted; I haven't decided the 'canon' lore for this AU just yet, so bear with me.
How I see C!Ratio is that while his motives have not changed significantly, his methods and execution did. You might ask, how so?
While Ratio has always believed that ignorance is a disease that needs to be cured, standard Ratio respects his student's autonomy in their journey to learn. C!Ratio, however, sees things differently.
He begins to derive pleasure from destroying their student's self-confidence... they start to become pliable and terrified, tormented by and trapped in the power imbalance taking its root. They don't have means to escape, do they? They become malleable for Ratio to reform them according to his idealsâ forcing them to learn. 'A lesson they won't forget.'
This can sometimes escalates to extremities. Physical, emotional, psychological means, nothing is out of the question. And it is also why he brings out the scalpel he owns at the end of my short comic.
When Aven finds out about this case, he immediately recognizes it as wrong, this is not the Ratio he knows. It is telling in the way he seems more irritated by daily inconveniences, the anectodes he shares about idiocy are more bitter, more unforgiving, more hopeless.
But he does not outright question the doctor about it. No, as direct confrontation would not work, not in this case, unless he wants to risk it to escalate to violence, which he vehemently wants to avoid. He is well aware Ratio would not resort to violence, but...
His silent investigation begins so: one fateful day, he slips unnoticed into one of Ratioâs lectures, just as he has done countless times before.. But this time, he confirms his worst fears.
That is where I'll leave it for now! I do not want to spoil further or make anything seem like it is set in stone. Or perhaps make room for future comics đ
#do note how he is more of a doctor than a professor here that is very intentional#how i see aven is that he kinda keeps to himself when he suspects something that could#lead to confrontation. but if that is ooc or something contradicts that please do let me know!#this post accidentally became more about ratio than aven. ah well#thanks for the ask!#asks#kime spam
33 notes
·
View notes
Text
Xander Support Science Rebuttal/Review + How Mediocre Localization Could Change A Character (1/2)
A couple of days ago I said I would do this because I havenât watched the videos in question in a long time, and I wanted to see if I would hold the same opinions that I do now. In short, yeah, I do. (Part 2 of this Post)
The videos in question by Ghast (going by Faerghast now) can be found here: Part 1Â Part 2
Youâve all most likely seen my posts and short analyses about Fatesâ writing, itâs localization, and Xander as a whole. I wanted to make this rebuttal/review, not just as a way to get my differing opinion out there, but to also provide context on how translation and localization can alter a characterâs interpretation with even the slightest change, and a brief summary on how Xander was supposed to be written from the get go.
TL;DR (Though I highly recommend reading the whole thing to really understand the point I am trying to make with this series of posts):
Xanderâs character was altered in the localization due to a number of changes made that either replace/remove the original context of his writing, or add things that werenât even present in the first place. The reason why Iâm doing a rebuttal against these videos in the first place is because the greater community cite these videos as the correct interpretation of Xander, with there being no acknowledgement of localization being a factor of why Xander seems so inconsistent and poorly written. Further worsening the issue is Ghastâs own reading of Xanderâs character, by roping him into a few select traits, and ignoring others.
Before moving on with the meat of the review, Iâd like to link some things that would be useful to read/watch when theyâll be referenced in these posts:
- Analysis of the relationship between Garon and the Nohrian siblings (aka the abusive royal household)
- Xanderâs Japanese supports with Camilla and Corrin. Here is a link to the localized Fates supports in order to spot differences.
-English patched playthroughs of the JP version of the game done by Linkmstr (Pre-decision  Birthright  Conquest  Revelation) as well as a link to said patch done by a team on Serenes.
-A link to the chapters of Fates, each one has a link to the script of said chapter.
(Iâll also be using quotes from Ghast in the videos, usually marked by time stamps)
Xander Summary
Xander is an intimidating figure who is seen as a stoic and unemotional Crown Prince. In actuality, heâs merely an introverted dude riddled with trauma, and is unable to express his emotions in a ânormalâ way. The person whoâs feared by tons of people in Hoshido is the same guy who gets anxiety during public speaking (dealing with this by imagining his audience as bunnies or carrots depending on the version) and whoâs greatest fear as a child was his own father (as revealed in the Boo Camp DLC).
Heâs also heavily suicidal, a result of each time having to kill his enemies weighing heavily on his heart and his psyche.
While he seems to be relatively put together, all of these aforementioned factors influence his character, and the dichotomy of appealing to his duty as Crown Prince and appealing to his emotions. Moreover, it has lead him into a deep seated denial of his fatherâs evil actions, trying to justify or excuse the things Garon had done, a fairly common symptom of an abused child. Not only that, but it has lead him to believe that betraying Garon is synonymous with betraying his family and all of Nohr, something he finds inexcusable and outrageous, and only breaks out of this way of thinking once he witnesses Garon become truly monstrous.
And while trying to do whatâs best for his people and his family are major parts of his character, they are not the only ones, and as we see in the game, they lead to him doing things that some would see as OOC, but actually are pretty reasonable if you dig deep into what makes Xander, well, Xander.
The Beginning
Unfortunately, a lot of this is lost in localization, which preferred to make him less introverted and more... observational and witty? Heâs more confrontational in the localization, but only sometimes when the story needs him to be, making him look inconsistent and badly written. He tends to preach a lot more, but ends up contradicting himself through his words and actions. Almost all of these are issues added by the localized script, and either were completely different or just plain absent in the original JP script.
And the reason why this rebuttal exists, is because the videos blame the gameâs writing instead of this very faulty translation, made even worse by the fact that Ghastâs channel is popular because of story/character analyses, so not mentioning how translation can affect story telling is the first glaring issue with the support science.
The first video starts with the main issue, how Fates has characterâs written well in supports, but not in the main campaign. Thatâs the main thing with this, so Iâll save an overview for it later.
Mistranslated Support Lines
-At 2:25, Ghast talks about Support Xander, starting off with the Camilla-Xander support. The line in question thatâs referenced is how Xander deliberately cultivated the image of him being stoic and seemingly uncaring. However, this isnât true, Xander didnât cultivate the image in the original JP support, he just ended up realizing that was how people saw him and thought it would be too much of a hassle to change it. This fits in line with how he acts later in the story, as an introverted character, heâs ultimately non-confrontational unless pushed to the limit.
-At 7:55, the Corrin support is brought up. This is the support that is the key reason why Xander is seen as two different characters between story and supports. The line where Xander said heâs now strong enough to stand up against Garon whenever he felt like it wasnât present at all in the original JP support. Hence, continuing on with the idea that Xander is not as confrontational as he seems, and preferred to swing his sword to let out his emotions instead.
-Ghast then goes on to discuss why thereâs this discrepancy between Xander in supports and story, where Xander supposedly acts out of character by fighting Corrin in chapter 2 on Garonâs orders (at 14:31):
âFor this segment of the video, bear in mind what has been established about Support Xander so far. The feats that Support xander has disclosed from his past, particularly his courageousness to engage Garon in yelling fights and pre-established love for Corrin is entirely contradicted from the offset of the game...Given their (Xander and Garonâs) relationship before the game even starts, the game provides absolutely no reason why Xander would behave in such a sheepish way to his father. Where is the bravery he was talking about before? Wht did Xander hope to accomplish by striking at Corrin? Did he want to disable her? Did he intentionally want to harm her for Garonâs sake?âÂ
Except thatâs not true. Applying what we know with Xander being non confrontational, scared to death of his father, being all too familiar with family dying around him, etc, and this scene really isnât too out of character. But it seems so because of the lines added in the English script.
Adherence To Select Traits
-At 16:10-18:20, he goes on to claim that Xanderâs reaction to Corrin choosing to fight for Hoshido is uncharacteristic and âstupidâ because of the formerâs pre-established observational skills, doubts of Garon, and tendency to stand against his father when he disagrees with him (all of which are more exaggerated/added in the English script).
Besides the fact that Xander wasnât written to be someone who regularly stands up to his father in the first place, the insistence that Xander remains strictly observational and pragmatic in these scenarios is the first big issue I have with these videos.
Ghast picks certain traits and latches them onto Xander without considering others that might influence the his actions; itâs true that Xanderâs awareness of Corrinâs situation might have let him come to terms with the Hoshido family wanting them back, and yes they were kidnapped, BUT they were also raised as if actual siblings for over a decade, and feelings/attachment towards one's family is hard to let go of. Wanting Xander to be more accepting of Corrinâs choice of going back to Hoshido and, to him, abandon their family and everything theyâve had, just to have him continue to have his hidden awareness/familial observation be more forward completely betrays the fact that theyâre still family, and Xander as a person should be allowed to have feelings and still love his sibling.Â
The point thatâs apparently tried to be made is for consistencyâs sake, but what good is this supposed consistency when it doesnât make sense for a family member to just accept their sibling siding with their enemy. Ghast goes on to say that heâd rather Xander say âIâm sorry for keeping secrets from you and Iâll follow up on those claims about Garon, but please come backâ, and thatâs basically what he says, but instead of trying to understand why Xander would react the way he would he instead reduces Xanderâs reaction to a childish âGet Bent, Traitorâ.Â
Xanderâs dedication to his family and his country arenât mutually exclusive, at least to him. So when Corrin decides to break ties with Nohr, Xander sees it as them throwing away their family, friends, and every good memory theyâve had. Aside from the fact that Xanderâs vehement defense of Garon is a result of having an abusive/destructive childhood, the shock of and surge of emotion from Corrin choosing to, from Xanderâs perspective, betray everything theyâve had together is in my opinion, a perfectly fine reason for why Xander acts like he does. Ghast says this type of read of the situation is stupid, which isnât a valid criticism and he doesnât even go into why he believes so, and says itâs uncharacteristic, even though it really isnât but the localization and his own insistence on having Xander adhere to a select few traits makes it seem that way.
Misplaced Criticism
-At 18:01 âItâs alright for Xander to continue to try and persuade Corrin to rejoin Nohr, but he ought to be able to understand Corrinâs wavering loyalty. Itâs hypocritical for Xander to flagrantly and ignorantly criticize Corrin for their decision and distance himself the most despite being made out to be the closest to themâÂ
Why? Again this ignores Xanderâs own character having thoughts and feelings of his own, but also wouldnât it make sense for the one to be closest to Corrin to be the most affected by it, and ergo the have the most negative reaction?
-Talks about the Xander line at chapter 12 at 18:28, âXander doesnât make connections around the circumstances regarding Corrinâs betrayal after 5 chaptersâ He says this makes Xander out to be someone who has no observational skills, but in regards to what? Making connections to the reasons behind Corrinâs betrayal, leading him to question and go against his father? Well, that reasoning hinges on the fact that Xander is the person who would stand up to his father in situations like these in the first place, but he isnât. Any lines indicating such are a result of the localization adding them in.
The criticism of Xanderâs observation skills doesnât make sense. In the context of the situation, where Xander is engaging a loved family member after they betrayed the Kingdom (which to Xander is synonymous with betraying the family), why are his observational skills being brought up? The reason why heâs engaging could just be summarized as âheâs angry and hurt that Corrin would fight their familyâ. A completely justified reaction to what Xander has been experiencing. But instead this is ignored in favor of criticizing Xander for not having the awareness of why Corrin betrayed Nohr, and the awareness of Garon being evil. Ghast says âStory Xander is unable to catch on that his dad is going bonkersâ Simply put, itâs most likely that Xander IS aware, but keeps it locked deep down due to deep seeded denial. In chapter 27, (taken from English patch of JP version) he says as much:
Garon: Just what do you know about me...?
Xander: I should be saying that to you... Just what do you know about FatherâŠ?! ...All this time, I acted like I didnât notice. No matter what the order, I obeyed. And that, in the end, you would return to your normal self. Thatâs what I believed. But, now, Father is⊠alreadyâŠ
Said denial had run so far, that it took Xander seeing Garon as a literal grotesque monster for him to finally break free.Â
Xanderâs Way of Thinking
-At 20:05, âWhile itâs true that Garon is family and Corrin is seemingly betraying that family, Xanderâs supports suggest that he would at least consider Corrinâs motivations before putting a sword through her'' 1) itâs not seemingly, Corrin is pretty much betraying her family by choosing one nation over the other, made worse by the fact that Nohr is synonymous with family to Xander, making this worse 2) itâs completely possible that Xander does understand Corrinâs motivations by this point, but is simply too angry and hurt by his siblingâs betrayal to care or acknowledge. âIt makes it seem like Story Xander has no critical thinking skills or has lost every ounce of empathy he has thatâs established in his supportsâ or that this is just his reaction to these events, as I previously said? Itâs not Xander lacking critical thought thatâs the driving point here, he believes that Corrin going against Nohr, means that theyâre going against him, their family, all of the innocent people in Nohr, everything theyâve had together.Â
This includes Garon, because as a result of his upbringing, he justifies any shitty action Garon does because heâs clinging to any good thing his father has done, and desperately denies that he could be evil, because âhow could the person that raised and cared for me be as bad as my brother/sister, who threw everything our family had together in our face, says he is. I love my sibling dearly, but asking to betray my father is asking to betray my family, my country, and my people, I canât do thatâ; thatâs essentially Xanderâs way of thinking. Extreme, yes, but people donât always do whatâs considered the right thing just because itâs the right thing. Thereâs a whole slew of factors Iâve already explained as to why Xander would be hard pressed to betray Garon.
---
Anyway, this is what I have for today. There will be 2 (maybe 3?) more posts in regards to the rest of my notes. I hope you enjoyed the start of this, please leave any replies and asks and reblogs on any things you liked about this and anything you think I could improve on!
#fire emblem#fire emblem fates#fire emblem if#fire emblem 14#fe14#xander fire emblem#marx fire emblem#fire emblem opinions
32 notes
·
View notes