#jonsa foreshadow
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Does someone know a Jonsa fanfic where Sansa arrives in Castle Black and Jon is still in his wolf-coma? Ghost bonding with Sansa while Jon is warging on himā¦?
Please let me know š I would appreciate it a lot
#jonsa#canon jonsa#jonsa foreshadow#jonsa fandom#jonsa fic#jonsa foreshadowing#precanon jonsa#jonsa speculation#jonsa fanfiction#jonsa meta#jonsaedit#postcanon jonsa
32 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
people can look down on shippers all they like but iām having a blast in this bitch. rereading acok is just so much more fun when youāre just stumbling upon jonsa crumbs left and right like i just read āSansa turned towards the sept. Two stableboys followed, and one of the guards whose watch was ended. Others fell in behind them.ā and iām literally giggling kicking my feet twirling my hair like I just read a makeout scene
#jonsa#to me this reads as foreshadowing sansa as a leader and who will be by her side#two stableboys could kinda be anyone. bran and rickon? sandor and another protector (brienne?) or brienne and pod?#and then jon ofc#and āothers fell in behindā is them amassing power / an army together#ā¦ā¦ā¦or it all means nothing at all š„“#meta
199 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
Sansa crushing hard on two dark-haired boys joining institutions demanding celibacy for the rest of their lives
180 notes
Ā·
View notes
Note
omfg you have every right to be angry over that anon. What a condescending, arrogant ask. There's an extra level of insult, because people aren't just trying to dispute your opinion, they're trying to waste your time, energy, and thinking too. It's not an honest and equal debate, it's just pure entitlement.
Something for your perusal: I've been reading the ASOIAF books again and was curious when I came upon Catelyn's passage up the Eyrie in AGOTA, where she laments that Mya Stone won't be able to marry the boy she's in love with because she's a bastard. Then Catelyn muses that Mya reminds her of Sansa. I thought this was interesting because of how the information is introduced, and then the Mya-Sansa parallels. Sansa becomes a bastard when Jon is a secret prince sort of business. I haven't seen anybody mention this and thought it was curious.
Thank you! <3
And there's actually a lot of stuff in that Mya Stone moment.
For one, it happens at a time when we already know that Sansa's own dreams are as hopeless as Mya's, no matter that Sansa is trueborn, because Cat and Ned both agreed to marry her to House Lannister and at the Trident Joffrey took off his mask and nothing is being done about it regarding Sansa.
Then we have the parallel to Littlefinger, whose crush (trueborn but low status) was always as hopeless as Mya's.
Then we have the fact that Cat foregoes an obvious comparison (tomboyish Arya) by focusing on not one but two other people in regard to Mya. First the unpleasant association with Jon Snow, followed by a softening when she recognizes the resemblance to Sansa.
"MyaĀ Stone, if it please you, my lady," the girl said. It did not please her; it was an effort for Catelyn to keep the smile on her face. Stone was a bastard's name in the Vale, as Snow was in the north, and Flowers in Highgarden; in each of the Seven Kingdoms, custom had fashioned a surname for children born with no names of their own. Catelyn had nothing against this girl, but suddenly she could not help but think of Ned's bastard on the Wall, and the thought made her angry and guilty, both at once. She struggled to find words for a reply. [...] "Mychel's my love," Mya explained. "Mychel Redfort. He's squire to Ser Lyn Corbray. We're to wed as soon as he becomes a knight, next year or the year after." She sounded so likeĀ Sansa, so happy and innocent with herĀ dreams. Catelyn smiled, but the smile was tinged with sadness. The Redforts were an old name in the Vale, she knew, with the blood of the First Men in their veins. His love she might be, but no Redfort would ever wed a bastard. His family would arrange a more suitable match for him, to a Corbray or a Waynwood or a Royce, or perhaps a daughter of some greater house outside the Vale. If Mychel Redfort laid with this girl at all, it would be on the wrong side of the sheet. (AGOT, Catelyn VI)
Mya makes her feel guilty and angry when thinking of Jon Snow, but bittersweet when contemplating her similarity to Sansa and the impossibility of her dreams. It's easier to handle Mya's status when connecting her to Sansa, someone Cat knows how to love, rather than Jon, whose existence strips all romance from the veneer of the brutal society and the reality of patriarchy for Catelyn herself. She doesn't hate bastards, she even has sympathy for them. She only hates what Jon represents for herself.
Sansa ends up modeling her own bastard figure after Jon Snow (fourteen and bastard brave), and from what we have seen of Jon's own struggles with bastardy, his own unfullfilled dreams, it becomes easy to directly compare Sansa and Jon as similar souls, with similar hopes and disappointments, with their shared longing for something unattainable by the rules of their society.
Within the one mirroring scene coming down the mountain in AFFC, Sansa contemplates Mya Stone's lost virtue (after Cat's predictions have come to pass) and potential future husband of fitting status who would love her anyway, and she will also be reminded of Jon Snow. "I am a bastard too now, just like him. Oh, it would be so sweet, to see him once again. But of course that could never be."
The chapter ends with a proposed miracle transformation. Littlefinger paints the picture of a reveal of true identity: The bastard sheds their mask and is recognized for their true self. Something that can only happen to a false bastard. Like Sansa.
Who is so similar to Jon. With his impossible dreams.
74 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
My favorite chapter sequence in A Storm of Swords so far on this reread: Bran III -> Jon V.
They're both at Queenscrown.
Bran explains the Gift and why it's called that. There are two gifts to the Night's Watch: Brandon's Gift and the New Gift (Queen Alysanne's gift).
Bran wargs into Summer.
Jon thinks about Ned's plan to settle the Gift.
"... a dream for spring ..."
Jon thinks about how he might have been chosen to hold a tower in Ned's name, if winter had come and gone faster.
Ygritte: "I'm half a fish, I'll have you know." š¤
Jon explains why it's called Queenscrown.
Ygritte asks if a queen lived there, and Jon says: "A queen stayed there for a night." š¤
That queen was Alysanne, married to her brother Jaehaerys.
"I see a crow and a crow wife."
Summer, who Bran was warging into when we left his POV, saves Jon by attacking the wildlings when Jon can't kill the old man.
#so many goodies#thank you grrm for the food#a storm of swords#nothing new here i'm just having a good time#bran stark#jon snow#asoiaf foreshadowing#thinking about asoiaf#do i tag this full on jonsa or just#jonsa adjacent
52 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
How does one read the story in the books and then write stuff like this?
Literally there are Northerners in the books mocking Rhaegar Frey for his name and these people think him having a son named Jonos is foreshadowing? In the text Wyman Manderly calls Rhaegar Frey a WORM and no dragon -
"That smirking worm who wears a dragon's name" - Davos, ADwD.
Manderly is saying that Rhaegar Frey is not worthy of the name and mocking the Frey for having a dragon's name. So, no. Jonos is not a hint for Jon Snow. Jonos is just another name like his wife's name is Jeyne or his other children being named Robert and Walda. Just like Jeyne, Robert and Walda are not hinting at other characters it's the same for Jonos.
In fact contrary to what Jonsa shippers are positing here, in the story the characters are saying that it's not just the name, but character and personality also matters.
This is why context and story is always important instead of picking and choosing random words, text, sentence structures and phrases the author loves to use to create a narrative not supported by the text. Using the off book Jonnel/Sansa stuff for Jonsa is just as ludicrous as using Rhaegar's Frey son being Jonos as some kind of sign for R+L=J. When, in the story, the character of Rhaegar Frey is specifically being dragged for not being worthy of a dragon's name.
#anti Jonsa#Is anyone saying that Rhaegar Frey's son being named Jonos is some kind of R+L=J foreshadowing?#First I am hearing of this.
50 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
The guy she met The guy she made
#no cause the aegonys think they were baited with boatbaby#what about me#jonsa#and their baby#like what about the missed foreshadowing of Jon holding a son covered in a cloak#while smiling#and of course the baby is given by his lady love
85 notes
Ā·
View notes
Note
the ashford theory with j0n or aegon just means it signifies sansa's suitors and it ties into political marriage with what we see with the north heir crisis could have a j0nsa marriage betrothal but then again like the other suitors it might not even be endgame just something that happens as a plot point, its the fans resisting the idea of it so much but not with other characters ,when j0nsa could make perfect sense for the north heir crisis plot makes me laugh a bit and now the same fans say his targ heritage doesnt matter but they were so keen on it with others d@ny's hypothetical marriage to him , his targ/lyann@ heritage reveal is important to the plot maybe not to his personal motives (unless he goes nuts and demands the north by right as robb's heir) but its going to affect the plot whether they like it or not, j0nsa hypothetical match being so furiously debated feels like sore losing
Youāre so correct, anon. Itās mostly because Sansa isnāt a fan favourite, and even with most people who do like her, they donāt want her to end up with anyone because of her general history with men (which is sort of understandable). But suddenly saying that Jonās Targaryen heritage doesnāt matter just to argue against a ship is buck wild. I genuinely want to study the people who said this like rats in a lab.
#I really love how youāve censored every name haha#and for your last ask#I got so involved with debunking the SR argument that I completely overlooked what you were actually saying#Iām sorry anon#yup jonsa irritates the shit out of the general fandom because they canāt stand seeing someone girly and annoying like Sansa#with a brooding and handsome and kind hero like Jon#they would much rather make insane statements like the targ heritage thing you just mentioned than to just admit that they see#jonsa foreshadowing too#I want to frame the last sentence of the ask#jonsa hypothetical match being so furiously debated feels like sore losing#jonsa#anon asks t
15 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
ok rereading asos on the train and this was very important to me
#almost screamed#i feel soooo delusional#idc!!!!#jon x sansa#jonsa#is this foreshadowing#who knows#but i had a terrible day at the clinic and it gave me the serotonin i needed
76 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
this is very much applicable to j*nsa fans who think they can warp the narrative and create stuff from thin air drawing bogus theories and stealing from other characters and dynamics when they should have just admitted to themselves that they simply want to f jon and itās not that deep
media literacy would automatically go up 100% if people knew how to consume stories without self-inserting themselves into the characters' shoes. "if i were him..." you're NOT. you may relate to his story, his past, his traits, his quirks, his identity but the moment you start treating the story accepting what you feel/think as what the character feels/thinks, you're misunderstanding the story.
35K notes
Ā·
View notes
Note
Half of the evidence for jonsa is a reach, though...I do think they will reunite like in the show but to say that it will be romantic because Jon chopped of Jano Slynt's head /for Sansa/ (when he never even thinks of her) is a big leap. If anything, it's intended to show Jon embracing his Stark roots - which would mean he will definetly not want to be romantic with his sister.
if it was just janos slyntās beheading linking jon and sansa then i would agree with you but the thing is that itās not just that momentā¦there are so many combined moments linking them that i truly canāt interpret it any other way than romantic foreshadowing.
like thereās the ashford tourney foreshadowing sansaās final betrothal to a targ. and jon and sansa having matching dreams about rebuilding winterfell and naming their children after their family (with the members not mentioned in sansaās dream being mentioned in jonās, so their dream is only ācompleteā when placed together). and jon and sansaās first loves resembling each other. and then thereās jonnel/sansa. and then thereās how the books are structured so jon and sansaās chapters always follow each other whenever there is an emphasis on marriage/romance/children. and these are just off the top of my head, there are many more links that occur throughout the text.
i could dismiss janos slynt as just a reference to jonās stark identity or a future familial relationship between jon and sansa. i could dismiss the ashford tourney theory as foreshadowing f/ageon not jon. i would have dismissed it if these were the singular, isolated instances that connect them. but when things begin to stack up and become a pattern rather than coincidence it starts to feel more and more like grrm is waggling his eyebrows suggestively and gesturing furtively all while mouthing ālook over hereā.
#love how antis fixate on solitary pieces of evidence. but that isnāt what makes jonsa so interesting to me#whatās interesting is that grrm is laying it on Thick. there is evidence upon evidence upon evidence#which is why our corner of the internet is still so active. bc there is so much to discuss and work with#like thereās more foreshadowing for jonsa than there is for any other asoiaf theory that iāve seen. it canāt all be coincidental#how does half the fandom not find that at least kind of interesting. not even from a shipping perspective but just to understand the text#asks
79 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
Jon Snow : Sansa looked radiant
Harry Potter : She dived under the table to retrieve the bowl and emerged with her face glowing like the setting sun
Same vibes
#sansa stark#jon snow#jon x sansa#jonsa#i do not ship them#but come on#the foreshadowing#harry potter#ginny weasley#hinny#i do ship them though#asoiaf x harry potter#kinda#narrative parallels#the chamber of secrets#a game of thrones
109 notes
Ā·
View notes
Note
Sorry, I didnāt mean to be combative! Iām also not saying that auburn isnāt a shade of red. It is. It wasnāt the word I chose to describe my hair until I had hair stylists tell me my hair is auburn. Iām not really saying it only appears red in special lightingāIām kind of saying the opposite. In certain kinds of lighting (overcast diffuse light or cool artificial light), the red gets lost. In natural sunny light, the red hue is obvious. Iām really just saying that itās not as bright red as the majority of people depict in fanart. If I stand next to a true brunette, the difference is obvious, but if Iām in cool lighting without comparison, many would mistake me for a brunette. Iām really not trying to argue the point, I just fear I was misinterpreted and want to correct that and to again apologize for coming across as combative
I still maintain that auburn should always be recognizably red, and more importantly that it certainly is meant to be so in the context of the books.
(And the Val scene is absurd, color-wise, it being bright sunny day. If anything her hair should shine brighter, not darker, so why "dark honey" and blue eyes if GRRM's not suggesting that Jon isn't seing the person in front of him but a reflection of the "princess" he will delude himself into thinking she is within the span of the scene, only to be painfully disillusioned soon after? There's purpose in there. And why those specific colors then?)
None of this needs to reflect on your personal hair color and hair stylists' opinions on it.
I understand and appreciate you didn't intend to be combative. Neither do I. Sansa is not an orange ginger, we both agree. Some people enjoy depicting her that way, anyway, because it's pretty and eye-catching. Which had nothing to do with my post, though, we also probably both agree. Let's just bury this now. š
12 notes
Ā·
View notes
Photo
Also pointing out Jonās words: āNed Starkās daughter shall speak for them.ā (the North)
Well, well, wellā¦ must be intrusive thoughts surfacing that theyāre:
cousins, cousins, cousins hmmm.
Both are still alive, geographically close to each other, our Queen riding toā
absolute clowns: *threatening jon snow* sansa and arya: *kill bill sirens*Ā
#jonsa fits narrative context and symbolism#jonsa foreshadowing#jon snow ending#jon stark#king and queen in the north
11K notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
It's funny that the same folks who make up nonsense about 'blood supremacy' and 'eugenics' to hate on the Targaryens are obsessed, like really, really obsessed with Sansa calling herself 'the blood of Winterfell' and use that as the reason for their favorite Jonsa crackship and for why Sansa will rule the North.
Having a certain 'blood' is apparently very important for shipping reasons and for why one feudal queen should rule over the peasants and serfs. But it's also Aryan ideology and 'blood supremacy' if other characters uphold their house in the same way.
It's funny that they bring real world ethics into this fictional fantasy world to argue blood supremacy to hate on certain characters and houses while all the time justifying in world Westerosi child abuse, classism, sexism, bullying and ableism as being right because it's the done thing.
In a fantasy world where certain groups of people do have magical powers based on who they are and their bloodline - Targaryens having prophetic dreams and Starks having warging powers - it's funny they are trying to argue that a girl fighting against slavery is the real evil because of her house and her blood and she has to die in violent and painful ways since in her case eugenics and blood purity applies and ALL TARGARYENS MUST BE EXTERMINATED. Except for Jon Snow who weirdly escapes the evilness despite having Targaryen blood because he has the SUPER GOOD SPECIALEST STARK BLOOD that dilutes the evil Targaryen blood. also he's THE BLOOD OF WINTERFELL!.
Here's the deal:
Arya being the only Stark child to have the Stark look IS IMPORTANT TO HER STORY, plays a part in her narrative and foreshadows her future arc.
[I love how stans get triggered when this is brought up in terms of Arya's character and her importance but use it generously to prop up their shitty crackship. Oh, Sansa imagines one of her kids would look like Arya? This means she has children with Jon ā¤ļøā¤ļøā¤ļø]
The Direwolves are important. They are gifts from the Old Gods. Nymeria being a leader of a huge wolf pack is important.
You know, I donāt like to give things away.ā says Martin, a grin spreading across his face. āBut you donāt hang a giant wolf pack on the wall unless you intend to use it.ā - GRRM
āYou have five trueborn children,ā Jon said. āThree sons, two daughters. The direwolf is the sigil of your House. Your children were meant to have these pups, my lord.āĀ Ā - Bran, AGoT
Magical powers linked to blood are important in the fictional fantasy world of The Song of Ice and Fire. Especially when they are facing an otherworldy magical existential, apocalyptic threat from beyond the Wall. They need dragons, direwolves, prophetic dreams and magical swords to save the entire realm!
Bran, Arya, Rickon and Jon Snow being wargs who are having wolf dreams and communicating with each other through their direwolves is important.
Arya being her father's child in every way that matters IS IMPORTANT TO HER STORY. Her father literally talks to her through weirwoods and gives her strength and courage. She has learned from him on what it takes to administer Winterfell. These are necessary character building subplots for characters to ultimately end up in leading positions.
Arya being her mother's child and proactively taking charge, being a leader and getting things done in terms of surviving in a man's world is ALSO IMPORTANT TO HER STORY.
Arya has a connection to the North through her father - the North is literally rising up in ADwD to save Ned's precious, valiant little girl - and has a connection to the Riverlands and her mother - the brotherhood without banners.
Characters having certain features because they belong to a house is an important and running theme in the books. It's not just house Targaryen. The Lannisters have a certain look - hence why Ned figures out who Joffrey's father is. The Starks have a certain look - this plays into Catelyn's hatred for Jon because he looks more Stark than Robb which is important in terms of being the future heir considering ALL the Starks who have ruled the North thus far have the Stark look. Hell, the Baratheons having a certain look is what leads Ned Stark to crack the secret of Lannister incest - 'The seed is strong'. Applying real world genetics and biology to a fantasy world is idiotic.
Jon Snow looking like a Stark is important in terms of his secret mystery parentage and who his mother is. His special bond with Arya gains significance considering she looks like Lyanna and that is Jon's mother. Lyanna having the Stark look is important. Sansa looking like Catelyn is the major component of her relationship with Petyr Baelish spanning over 5 books.
GRRM is not randomly writing characters looking a certain way for shits and giggles. These are important, narrative and foreshadowing plot points.
114 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
Throwback to when I really thought we'd be given another scene of Sansa giving Jon a cloak but now their baby is wrapped in it.
#like#I'm forever#jonsa#it's the clownery for me#my god#when will twow be released so I can have peace#man the wasted foreshadowing
47 notes
Ā·
View notes