#jfsa

[allhorsenoplinko]

In 1975, Jorge Fink, of Baton Rogue, Louisiana, would look upon his 1972 Super Beetle, which had just been flooded in a rain storm, and wonder to himself; "What if I were to make it float, next time?". By 1976, he would have begun his legacy, of producing the J. Fink Submersive Autos Catfish, a kit car producible from a 1972 onwards Superbeetle, powered by the original Flat 4, although with a modification to allow the engine to become a propeller, much like the original Schwimmwagen of the Germans, though able to be switched on from a lever in the cockpit, rather than having to be manually dropped by hand on the original design. It was designed for comfort, and thus was one of the most expensive kit cars to purchase, although it could also be bought straight from the company, with a man coming to pick up your donor Beetle by the end of the month to build your new submersible vessel. A staggering 2900 would be built from the factory (with another 900 kits purchased from 1977-1983), using donor cars, leading to the surprisingly successful Submersive Autos (name changed in 1983, for simplicity), to be purchased by Cutts & Case Shipyard, in 1985, where it would become a subsidiary company, designing growingly successful kits, but soon, an entirely unique amphibious car, the company still operating today as Fink Submersive Autos, or FSA.

[aiautos]

The 1899 Hammnicar, invented by John M Hammond II, was a wooden car built in, well, 1899, by John to see what one of those newfangled automobiles could be used for, John used a two stroke inline 2 engine that made 14 horsepower, to power the Hammnicar to a whopping 15 mph on land, and 3 knots on the water. The Hammnicar was miraculously preserved through both world wars in a shed outside the M. Hammond estate from 1909-1987, and was donated to the Smithsonian Institution in 1988, after nearly 90 years of sitting unloved, and was restored for the 1990 "American Wild World of Wheels" Exhibit, displayed next to things like the first JFSA (Jorge Fink Submersive Autos) Catfish prototype, and the 1972 Cadillac-Jacuzzi Barcelona prototype, on loan from the Henry Ford Museum. This exhibit would help found the "Smithsonian Museum of American Automotive Innovation", inaugurated in 1995.

[pomfiores]

so like im thinking about that meme of marrying the muse for like what, a day or two. JUST. JUST. vil is ur wife. ur husband. ur Queen. to be ever so fortunate............... the queen’s hand,,, in ur muse’s hand. bro. say thank u. gawdamn, golLY.

[ryotarox]

British Post Office scandal - Wikipedia

Google翻訳 （＝いろいろ訳文がおかしいけど）

2009 年 5 月にComputer Weekly がHorizo​​n ソフトウェアの問題に関する記事を報道し、2009 年 9 月に副郵便局長のアラン・ベイツは正義のための郵便局長同盟 (JFSA) を設立しました。 2012年、運動家や国会議員からの圧力の結果、郵便局はホライゾン社の調査を行うために法医学会計士セカンド・サイトを任命した。Second Sight は、Horizo​​n には会計上の不一致を引き起こす可能性のある欠陥が含まれていると結論付けましたが、郵便局はソフトウェアにシステム的な問題はないと主張しました。 2017年、ベイツ率いる郵便局長555人のグループが郵便局を相手に高等裁判所に集団訴訟を起こした。2019年に裁判官が郵便局長と郵便局との契約は不当であり、Horizo​​nにはバグ、エラー、欠陥が含まれているとの判決を下した後、訴訟は5,800万ポンドで示談となり、訴訟後に原告らにはそれぞれ約2万ポンドが残された。費用がかかります。政府はその後、彼らの賞を補足することに同意した。2020年2月、首相は政府がこのスキャンダルに関する調査を開始すると述べ、後に法定の根拠となった。裁判所は2020年12月から有罪判決を取り消し始めた。 2024年1月の時点で、不当に有罪判決を受けた人のほとんどは依然として有罪判決が覆されるのを待っており、公開捜査が進行中であり、警視庁は郵便局と富士通を捜査している。 4 部構成のテレビドラマ「ミスター・ベイツ vs 郵便局」が 2024 年 1 月にITVで放送され、その後このスキャンダルは大きなニュース記事および政治問題になりました。同月、リシ・スナック首相は、不当に有罪判決を受けた郵便局長の無罪を問う新たな法案を発表した。

2000年頃、システムの問題が、1998年3月から2003年11月までクレイグ・イ・ドンの副郵便局長を務めていたアラン・ベイツによって報告された。2003年、ベイツは郵便局の方針に従うことを拒否したため、副郵便局長としての契約を打ち切られた。[17] [20]彼は2004 年にComputer Weeklyに懸念を報告した。2009 年までに公​​表できるだけの十分な証拠が収集されていた。[21]  2009 年 9 月に、ベイツらによって運動団体「郵便局長のための正義のための同盟」 (JFSA) が結成された。[16] 2012 年までに、メディアや多くの国会議員の間で懸念が高まった。その結果、独立調査会社セカンドサイトは、2012 年に郵便局から独立調査を依頼されました。[22] [11] [16]この期間、ロイヤル メール グループの最高責任者はジョン ロバーツ、アダムでした。クロジエとモヤ・グリーン、そして2012年にロイヤル・メールから分離したポスト・オフィス・リミテッドの最高経営責任者となったポーラ・ヴェネルズである[23]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 知性とは「自分が間違ってるかもしれない」と疑えることなのかも。

日本でも同じような行政とシステムのエラーが生じたらどうなるか。予防策としてなにができるか。

[ecodrisil]

The Growing Role of ESG Ratings in Investment Decisions: Regulatory Challenges and Business Benefits 

In the evolving landscape of sustainable investing, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ratings have become an indispensable tool for investors. A recent report by CDP reveals that a staggering 94% of investors use ESG ratings at least once a month, underscoring the growing influence of these tools in financial markets. However, despite their popularity, ESG ratings face significant scrutiny due to data integrity issues and regulatory fragmentation across geographies. This blog explores the current state of ESG ratings, the challenges posed by inconsistent regulations, and the broader implications for businesses. 

The Surge in ESG Ratings Usage 

ESG ratings have quickly become a critical component in investment strategies, offering insights into a company's sustainability performance and its alignment with societal values. With 94% of investors relying on these ratings monthly, it's clear that ESG factors are no longer a niche consideration but a mainstream element of financial decision-making. However, as the reliance on these ratings grows, so does the need for consistency and transparency. 

Challenges in ESG Data and Ratings 

The effectiveness of ESG ratings hinges on the quality and consistency of the underlying data. The CDP’s “Data for Public Good” report highlights several challenges: 

Data Integrity and Methodological Inconsistencies: ESG ratings often differ due to variations in data collection methods, rating objectives, and benchmarking standards. This lack of standardization can lead to confusion among investors and reduce the reliability of the ratings. 

Regulatory Fragmentation: Different jurisdictions are developing their own ESG-related regulations, which can create a fragmented landscape. This fragmentation not only risks confusing market participants but also opens the door to greenwashing—a practice where companies misleadingly portray their products or policies as environmentally friendly. 

Global Regulatory Developments 

Governments and regulatory bodies worldwide are at various stages of implementing ESG regulations, but the pace and nature of these developments vary significantly: 

United Kingdom: Currently follows a voluntary, industry-led code of conduct with new regulatory frameworks anticipated in the near future. 

European Union: Expected to finalize regulations by Fall 2024, aiming to standardize ESG disclosure requirements across member states. 

India: The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) introduced amendments to its credit rating agencies (CRA) guidelines and issued a Master Circular in July 2023, emphasizing the importance of ESG disclosures. 

Singapore & Hong Kong: Both regions are in the process of rolling out voluntary codes to guide ESG reporting. 

Japan: Implemented a voluntary code in December 2022 under the Japanese Financial Services Agency (JFSA), encouraging companies to enhance their ESG disclosures. 

The Business Value of ESG Beyond Compliance 

While regulatory compliance is a primary driver for companies adopting ESG practices, the benefits extend far beyond ticking regulatory boxes. ESG ratings provide businesses with valuable insights into operational efficiency, risk management, and strategic opportunities: 

Efficiency and Cost Reduction: By identifying areas of improvement, ESG data can help businesses streamline operations, reduce waste, and lower costs. 

Risk Management: ESG ratings enable companies to better understand and mitigate risks related to environmental impacts, social issues, and governance practices. 

Sustainability Goals: Transparent and science-based ESG ratings guide companies in aligning their strategies with global sustainability targets, such as the Paris Agreement, helping to attract investment and improve market positioning. 

As ESG ratings continue to gain traction, the broader financial industry is also grappling with the need for consistency and clarity. According to a related CDP article, 85% of financial institutions are utilizing ESG ratings as part of their investment strategies, yet they face similar challenges with regulatory fragmentation and data quality. These challenges underscore the importance of robust ESG reporting solutions for companies looking to navigate this evolving landscape.    Read more: https://ecodrisil.com/navigating-the-evolving-landscape-of-esg-ratings/ 

Conclusion 

As ESG ratings become integral to investment decisions, the call for standardized and transparent regulations grows louder. Policymakers worldwide need to align on definitions and methodologies to prevent confusion and enhance the credibility of ESG ratings. For businesses, embracing ESG goes beyond compliance—it's about unlocking efficiencies, managing risks, and aligning with global sustainability goals. 

Companies looking to navigate this complex landscape can benefit from robust ESG reporting solutions. Ecodrisil's ESG Xpress stands out by offering an easy-to-use platform that helps businesses streamline their ESG data management and reporting processes. With tools designed to improve data quality and provide actionable insights, Ecodrisil supports companies in meeting regulatory demands and driving their sustainability strategies forward. By leveraging Ecodrisil’s solutions, businesses can turn ESG challenges into opportunities, ensuring they not only comply with evolving standards but also lead in the pursuit of a sustainable and responsible future.

[iforexeye]

什麼是外匯交易外匯交易是全球最大的金融市場之一，每天交易量達到數萬億美元，交易所在世界各地，包括紐約、倫敦、東京、香港等地。外匯市場的參與者包括銀行、商業公司、投資基金、個人投資者等，他們可以通過買賣不同貨幣來獲取利潤。

合法交易平台

ThinkMarkets

监管机构（FCA、ASIC）最低入金（ 250美元） 詳情

Exness

监管机构（FCA、FSA ）最低入金（不限）詳情

外匯交易的特點

外匯市場是全球最大、最活躍的金融市場之一，每天交易量達數萬億美元，��此市場的流動性非常高。這意味着交易者可以快速買賣貨幣對，而且在市場價格波動較大時，也可以快速平倉。24小時交易，由於外匯市場分布在全球各地，因此交易時間也非常長，幾乎是全天候交易。投資者可以在世界各地的交易所進行交易，而不受時區限制。高槓桿交易，外匯交易是一種高槓桿交易，投資者只需要支付一小部分的保證金就可以控制大額交易，從而放大盈利和虧損。這意味着即使投資者只有少量的資金，也有機會進行大額交易，但同時也增加了交易風險。高風險高收益，外匯交易是一種高風險高收益的投資方式。投資者可以獲得高額的利潤，但同時也存在着高風險。因此，投資者需要具備充分的風險意識和交易技能，以便在交易中取得成功。

外匯交易常見名詞解釋

貨幣對：

貨幣對的本質是用於體現兩種貨幣之間的匯率，由兩個貨幣的代碼和一個分隔符組成。例如：貨幣對 EUR/USD 中， EUR（歐元）作為基準貨幣，USD（美元）作為報價貨幣，EUR/USD 當前報價為 1.14070 ，那麼此時 1 EUR（歐元） = 1.14070 USD （ 美元）。

槓桿：

外匯保證金交易的槓桿比例是指投資者需要支付的保證金與實際交易所需資本之間的比例。槓桿比例越高，投資者所需支付的保證金就越少，但是投資風險也越高。舉個例子，如果一個投資者想要進行10萬美元的外匯交易，他可以選擇一個槓桿比例為100:1的經紀商，那麼他只需要支付1,000美元的保證金就可以進行這筆交易。如果匯率變化導致他的交易盈利了1%，那麼他將獲得1,000美元的利潤，相當於他的投資資金增加了100%。但是如果匯率變化導致他的交易虧損了1%，那麼他將損失1,000美元，相當於他的投資資金減少了100%。

點差：

在外匯交易中，點差是買入價和賣出價之間的差價，也可以理解為交易成本。外匯經紀商會通過點差來獲取利潤，因此點差對於外匯投資者來說非常重要。點差通常以pip為單位計算，pip是“Price Interest Point”的縮寫，表示價格的最小變動單位。例如，EUR/USD的點差為0.0001，如果買入價為1.2000，賣出價為1.2001，那麼點差就是1個pip。投資者通常會尋找低點差的外匯經紀商進行交易，因為低點差可以降低交易成本，從而提高投資回報率。但需要注意的是，低點差並不一定意味着更好的交易條件。有些經紀商可能會在點差較低的同時提高其他費用，例如交易手續費���者滑點，從而增加投資者的交易成本。因此，投資者在選擇外匯經紀商時，應該綜合考慮各種因素，包括點差、手續費、交易平台、監管等，才能做出最優的選擇。

此外，投資者需要了解不同貨幣對的點差水平可能會有所不同，有些貨幣對的點差較低，例如EUR/USD、USD/JPY等主要貨幣對，而有些貨幣對的點差較高，例如一些較為少見的貨幣對。因此，投資者需要在選擇交易貨幣對時，也應該考慮點差因素。

預付款（保證金）：

外匯預付款也被稱為外匯保證金，是指投資者在進行外匯交易時，需要支付的一定金額的資金。這些資金通常以抵押的形式支付給外匯經紀商，以確保投資者能夠履行交易合約，並支付交易的虧損部分。

外匯預付款的金額通常是根據投資者選擇的槓桿比例和交易金額來確定的。例如，如果一個投資者選擇了100:1的槓桿比例，並進行了10,000美元的外匯交易，那麼他需要支付100美元的預付款，即10,000美元的交易金額乘以槓桿比例的倒數。

隔夜費（外匯隔夜利息）：

外匯隔夜利息也被稱為外匯利息或外匯持倉費用，是指外匯投資者持有某種貨幣對的頭寸過夜所需支付或獲得的利息。這些利息的正負取決於貨幣對的利率差異和交易方向。如果投資者持有的貨幣對的利率是高於市場平均水平的，那麼在持倉過夜時，他們將獲得隔夜利息。反之，如果投資者持有的貨幣對的利率低於市場平均水平，那麼在持倉過夜時，他們將需要支付隔夜利息。

需要注意的是，外匯隔夜利息只在持倉過夜時產生，如果投資者在當天平倉，那麼就不會產生隔夜利息。此外，在進行外匯交易時，投資者需要注意不同貨幣對的利率水平可能不同，有些貨幣對的利率可能會比較高，例如澳元/美元、紐元/美元等，而有些貨幣對的利率可能會比較低，例如歐元/美元、英鎊/美元等。因此，在選擇交易貨幣對時，投資者也應該考慮利率因素。

做多和做空：

做多和做空是外匯交易中兩個基本的交易方向。做多是指投資者買入某種貨幣對，希望在未來匯率上漲時獲得收益。例如，如果投資者認為歐元/美元的匯率將上漲，他們可以選擇買入歐元/美元，以期待在未來匯率上漲時獲得收益。

做空則是指投資者賣出某種貨幣對，希望在未來匯率下跌時獲得收益。例如，如果投資者認為英鎊/美元的匯率將下跌，他們可以選擇賣出英鎊/美元，以期待在未來匯率下跌時獲得收益。

需要注意的是，做多和做空是相對的交易方向，投資者可以在任何時候選擇做多或做空。在外匯交易中，投資者可以同時進行做多和做空的交易，以便更好地控制風險和獲得利潤。例如，如果投資者同時認為歐元/美元和英鎊/美元的匯率都會上漲，他們可以選擇買入這兩種貨幣對，以實現做多交易。反之，如果投資者同時認為歐元/美元和英鎊/美元的匯率都會下跌，他們可以選擇賣出這兩種貨幣對，以實現做空交易。

外匯交易平台是外匯交易者用來進行交易的軟件平台。外匯交易平台通常由外匯經紀商提供，可以提供交易工具、行情分析、實時報價、圖表分析以及交易管理等功能。

在選擇外匯交易平台時，投資者需要考慮多個因素，包括平台的穩定性、安全性、交易工具和功能、交易速度和執行質量、客戶支持和服務等。同時，投資者也需要注意平台的監管情況，選擇受到嚴格監管的外匯經紀商和交易平台，以保證自己的資金安全和交易合法性。

外匯監管機構

外匯監管機構是負責監管外匯市場和外匯經紀商的機構。外匯監管機構的主要職責是監督和規範外匯市場的運作，保護投資者的權益，防範欺詐和其他不法行為。

不同國家和地區的外匯監管機構可能會有所不同。以下是一些主要國家和地區的外匯監管機構：

美國：美國商品期貨交易委員會（CFTC）、全國期貨協會（NFA）

英國：金融市場行為監管局（FCA）

澳大利亞：澳大利亞證券與投資委員會（ASIC）

加拿大：加拿大證券管理局（CSA）

新西蘭：新西蘭金融市場監管局（FMA）

日本：日本金融廳（JFSA）

香港：香港證券及期貨事務監察委員會（SFC）

新加坡：新加坡金融管理局（MAS）

國際上公認的外匯行業裡面比較嚴格一些的：美國的NFA、英國的FCA、澳大利亞ASIC、還有瑞士的Finma，這四個裡面澳洲最弱，英國最強，美國和瑞士監管的外匯平台最少，美國的我們目前開不到，瑞士的要求平台要拿到銀行牌照才可以做外匯零售經紀業務，所以瑞士的平台通常後面都會加上銀行兩個字，而且出入金只能電匯美元。

FCA從2018年開始限制零售客戶槓桿30倍之後很多交易者開始轉向ASIC監管，ASIC不允許開大中華區客戶之後，大多數平台就開始轉向離岸監管來放大中華區客戶。

外匯離岸監管機構

外匯離岸監管機構是負責監管離岸外匯市場的機構。離岸外匯市場是指在離岸金融中心開展的外匯交易市場，其參與者包括外匯交易商、投資者、機構等。外匯離岸監管機構的主要任務是監管離岸外匯市場的運作，保護投資者的權益，防範欺詐和其他不法行為。

以下是一些常見的外匯離岸監管機構：

英屬維京群島金融服務委員會（BVI FSC）：

負責監管英屬維京群島的離岸外匯市場，包括外匯交易商的註冊、交易執行、客戶保護等方面。

開曼群島金融服務監管局（CIMA）：

負責監管開曼群島的離岸外匯市場，包括外匯交易商的註冊、交易執行、客戶保護等方面。

塞舌爾金融服務管理局（FSA）：

負責監管塞舌爾的離岸外匯市場，包括外匯交易商的註冊、交易執行、客戶保護等方面。

土耳其金融監管局（SPK）：

負責監管土耳其的離岸外匯市場，包括外匯交易商的註冊、交易執行、客戶保護等方面。

新加坡金融管理局（MAS）：

負責監管新加坡的離岸外匯市場，包括外匯交易商的註冊、交易執行、客戶保護等方面。

外匯離岸監管機構通常會要求外匯交易商遵守相關法規和規定，保障投資者的權益和資金安全。相對於美國的NFA、英國的FCA、澳大利亞ASIC、還有瑞士的Finma這些機構，還是差一些。

[otiskeene]

Nium Becomes First Global Fintech To Secure Coveted Type 1 Funds Transfer License From Japan's Financial Service Agency

Nium, a pioneer in instant cross-border payments, has reached a major milestone by becoming the first non-Japanese company to obtain a Type 1 Funds Transfer Service Provider (FTSP) license from the Japanese Financial Services Agency (JFSA). This license enables Nium to provide a wide array of financial services, such as transferring up to 50 million JPY per transaction through Japan's domestic payment clearing rail, Zengin-Net, to a Japanese recipient account.

The revision to Japan's Payment Services Act in 2021 removed cross-border transfer limits for Type 1 license holders in order to lower the expenses associated with money transfers to and from the country. Nevertheless, only a few companies have met the stringent requirements for regulatory approval, resulting in limited choices for cross-border payments. Nium's Type 1 license showcases its capacity to connect with local payment rails, conduct real-time transactions, disclose costs transparently, and offer significantly more competitive rates compared to other non-bank entities holding Type 2 licenses.

Anupam Pahuja, Executive Vice President of Asia Pacific, Middle East, and Africa at Nium, underscored the broader significance of this accomplishment, affirming that Nium stands as the premier global alternative for high-value transfers to and from Japan, enabling banks and businesses worldwide to enhance their engagement with the Japanese market.

Read More - https://www.techdogs.com/tech-news/pr-newswire/nium-becomes-first-global-fintech-to-secure-coveted-type-1-funds-transfer-license-from-japans-financial-service-agency

[olko71]

New Post has been published on All about business online

New Post has been published on https://yaroreviews.info/2024/02/post-office-victims-had-lives-utterly-destroyed

Post Office victims had lives 'utterly destroyed'

Getty Images

By Tom Espiner

Business reporter, BBC News

Sub-postmasters wrongfully prosecuted by the Post Office had their lives “utterly destroyed” by the scandal, lawyers acting for them have said.

Hundreds of people were convicted after faulty Horizon software flagged false discrepancies in accounts.

An ongoing public inquiry has been looking at how the court cases were brought against sub-postmasters.

One lawyer said this phase of the probe had “pulled back the curtain” on the scandal.

The fourth phase of the inquiry into the Horizon scandal drew to a close on Friday, having taken evidence from Post Office and Fujitsu employees over several months.

It looked at how investigations were conducted, and how information that the Post Office had which cast doubt on Horizon was not disclosed during court proceedings.

The next stages of the inquiry will see former Post Office boss Paula Vennells give evidence.

Last month, Ms Vennells handed back her CBE after facing mounting pressure following the broadcast of the ITV drama, Mr Bates vs the Post Office.

Politicians will also testify in phases five and six of the inquiry, including the former and current Liberal Democrat leaders Jo Swinson and Sir Ed Davey, Labour MP Pat McFadden and former conservative MP Margot James. All served for a time in various governments as the minister with responsibility for overseeing the Post Office.

Why were hundreds of Post Office workers prosecuted?

How do the Post Office compensation schemes work?

Summing up at the end of stage four, Tim Moloney KC, said 76 sub-postmasters had their convictions quashed “only after having their lives utterly destroyed by the scandal at the heart of this inquiry”.

Speaking on behalf of Hudgell Solicitors, he said the firm represented many of the sub-postmasters whose stories were featured in ITV drama.

In the series, sub-postmistress Jo Hamilton is portrayed as being “surrounded by paperwork, distraught and seeking assistance from a helpline”.

“The help offered was no help at all, doubling a discrepancy before her eyes,” he said, adding this was “real life for Jo”.

“Our clients’ stories repeatedly echo that awful fear, and the impossible question of themselves and Horizon,” Mr Moloney said.

“Time and again they asked for help,” he said. “For many, because none came, they stopped asking.

“Time and again their lives were ruined” by prosecution, he added, despite their telling the Post Office about the discrepancies and maintaining their innocence.

This phase in the inquiry had been “critically important in getting at the real truth for them, about what they went through”, he said.

The inquiry had shown that the Post Office approach to investigation and the recovery of losses, supported by Fujitsu, was “deeply and fundamentally flawed”.

He said the management and oversight of investigations and prosecutions was “wilfully blind” or “disregarding” of the “proper, lawful administration of justice”.

Mr Moloney added the Post Office and Fujitsu, which supplied the software, were focused on their own commercial interests, including brand reputation, rather than on the interests of sub-postmasters.

He said that evidence given to the inquiry could now lay some of the witnesses open to “rigorous criminal investigation”.

Sam Stein KC, representing the Justice for Sub-postmasters Alliance (JFSA) and 157 individual sub-postmasters, said this phase of the inquiry had “pulled back the curtain on the decades of the great Post Office cook-up and cover-up”.

The process wrecked the “physical, mental and economic health” of sub-postmasters, he said.

He said the inquiry had shown “disdain and dislike of sub-postmasters by the Post Office and their employees”, underlined by a Post Office investigator saying sub-postmasters were “all crooks”.

Mr Stein added that the latest phase of the inquiry had shown an “appalling lack of professionalism of lawyers, combined with bullying investigators”, a refusal to investigate the Horizon system because of what that would reveal, and that Post Office employees felt the firm “must be protected at all costs”.

He also criticised “corporate amnesia”, referring to a number of witnesses who said they could not remember details of events.

A Post Office spokesperson said: “We fully support the aims of the ongoing public inquiry to get to the truth of what happened in the past, and it is vital that Post Office witnesses are able to provide evidence openly so that the inquiry can assess all the evidence.”

On Thursday three more sub-postmaster convictions were overturned. The Post Office said at the time: “We are deeply sorry for past wrongs.”

“We’re doing our utmost to ensure any injustices are put right as swiftly as possible and full, fair compensation is paid.”

Related Topics

Post Office Inquiry

Post Office Ltd

More on this story

Why were hundreds of Post Office workers prosecuted?

23 January

How do the Post Office compensation schemes work?

11 January

How Post Office drama shone light on scandal

10 January

[kennak]

リコール・自主回収情報  食品 藤原製麺「JFSAゆで置き用うどん」（そばが混入）    (2023/10/18 - 17 Clicks) 【該当商品】商品：JFSAゆで置き用うどん内容量：500gJAN：4562343320390賞味期限：2025.3.1製造：2023年9月4日【理由】一部の商品にそばが混入していたため。【対策】回収・交換・返金【問い合わせ先】藤原製麺株式会社電話番号：0120-26-5485（土日祝日を除く9:00～17:00）※該当商品が手元にある場合は、上記連絡先へ連絡する。代替品への交換または返金対応。【送付先】〒070－0039北海道旭川市9条通14左10号藤原製麺株式会社※着払いで送付する。※商品の返送時には、郵便番号、住所、氏名、電話番号を書き添える。 食品

藤原製麺「JFSAゆで置き用うどん」（そばが混入）：クロネコヤマトのリコールドットjp

[moja-asia]

株式会社ジェフサのふりかけ

病院食の朝食で、ふりかけなどが付く事があった。毎食では無い。何を基準に付いたり付かなかったりしたのかもよくわからん。米の量は一定なの��。おかずが物足りないと判断したのか？ それはさておき、なんとなく見たことの無いふりかけだと思い、よく見てみると「株式会社ジェフサ」と書いてある。 ジェフサ？？初めて聞いた。このあたりでふりかけというなら、田中食品か三島食品、もしくは丸美屋とかにならんか？ なぜ、そんな東北の知らない会社をわざわざ採用してるんだろう？ ジェフサという会社を調べてみると、「日本外食流通サービス協会」と書かれていた。協会？？なんだそれ？？ 以下がJFSAの発展と設立の経過らしい。メーカーとは違うのだろうか？ ＪＦＳＡは1962年に故 佐藤正治氏（(株)サトー商会創業者）の基本理念に基…

[imoim36news]

Ngày 23/5, tại Tokyo (Nhật Bản), đoàn công tác của Ủy ban Chứng khoán Nhà nước đã có buổi làm việc với Cơ quan Dịch vụ Tài chính Nhật Bản (JFSA), nhằm trao đổi về hoạt động quản lý, giám sát thị trường chứng khoán, đặc biệt là cấp giám sát tại các tổ chức trung gian. Phát biểu tại buổi làm việc, bà Vũ Thị Chân Phương, Chủ tịch Ủy ban Chứng khoán Nhà nước, đánh giá cao sự hỗ trợ thiết thực và hiệu quả của JFSA dành cho Ủy ban Chứng khoán Nhà nước. Qua đó, góp phần thúc đẩy sự phát triển của thị trường chứng khoán Việt Nam thông qua các đợt chia sẻ kinh nghiệm về công tác quản lý, giám sát thị trường và đào tạo cán bộ. Đoàn công tác làm việc với các đơn vị chức năng của JFSA về kinh nghiệm quản lý, giám sát thị trường chứng khoán tại Nhật Bản. Trong thời gian tới, đại diện đoàn công tác của Việt Nam cũng mong muốn JFSA tiếp tục quan tâm, hỗ trợ Ủy ban Chứng khoán Nhà nước nói riêng và thị trường chứng khoán Việt Nam nói chung, đặc biệt trong việc phối hợp với Cơ quan Hợp tác quốc tế Nhật Bản (JICA) triển khai dự án “Nâng cao năng lực về thúc đẩy hiệu quả th��� trường chứng khoán Việt Nam” giai đoạn 2024 – 2027. Đồng thời, JFSA tiếp tục hỗ trợ Ủy ban Chứng khoán Nhà nước trong việc...

[etiennekissborlase]

Binance To Commence Operations In Japan Starting June

Binance To Commence Operations In Japan Starting June https://bitcoinist.com/binance-operations-in-japan-starting-june/ Binance decided to make a comeback in the Japanese crypto market after it acquired Sakura Exchange Bitcoin (SEBC), a regulated crypto exchange platform licensed by the Japan Financial Services Agency in November 2022. On Friday, a notice was published stating that Binance is preparing to commence operations in the Japanese market in June 2023. The notice says that SEBC’s current services will end on May 31, and a new service called “Binance Japan” will be launched in June 2023. No official launch date was announced in the SEBC notice. However, Binance Japan has been granted registration as a crypto exchange by the Japan Financial Services Agency (JFSA). At present, SEBC supports only 11 trading pairs because, in Japan, the process of listing tokens on exchanges requires extreme scrutiny by the Japan Virtual Currency Exchange Association. SEBC Crypto Exchange Users Must Withdraw Funds Before Deadline SEBC exchange users must withdraw their funds before May 28, which is the given deadline. If any funds remain in the account after the deadline, they will be converted to Japanese yen at the prevailing conversion rate as of June and refunded to the user’s registered bank account. Binance Japan users will have to undergo new identity verification and Know Your Customer checks. Related Reading: Binance Sets Foot In Japan With SEBC Acquisition Deal In order to use Binance Japan, customers are required to go through a separate application process, even if they already have an account with Sakura Exchange Bitcoin. This means that customers need to submit all necessary information for account opening and undergo reviews and identity verification again. The account opening information for Sakura Exchange Bitcoin is not transferred over to Binance Japan. This is important to ensure that all customers meet the necessary regulatory requirements for operating in Japan. Binance says it is committed to complying with local regulations in Japan and providing improved services to its users. By doing so, Japan might take a leading role in the world of cryptocurrencies and contribute to creating a responsible global environment for digital assets. Binance Re-enters Japan After A 5-Year-Long Hiatus Binance’s return to the Japanese market is happening through an acquired entity, nearly five years after its initial attempt to secure an independent license failed. In 2018, Binance had to shut down its operations in Japan because it was found to be operating without proper regulatory clearance from financial authorities. Not just Japan, Binance successfully reentered the Malaysian crypto market by acquiring a stake in the regulated MX Global platform. MX Global is one of the four Recognized Market Operators – Digital Asset Exchange licensed by the Securities Commission (SC) in Malaysia. Additionally, the exchange was able to establish a presence in the Singapore market through an 18% stake in HG Exchange, a regulated stock exchange. The efforts of Prime Minister Fumio Kishida to strengthen Japan’s economy have made Japan loosen crypto regulations. The Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA) has played a key role in this process, making it easier for foreign companies and crypto exchanges like Binance to enter the Japanese market. One of the key changes is the easing of the listing of virtual coins, allowing for a wider range of digital assets to be traded. Japan is among the earliest countries to introduce regulations for the cryptocurrency industry. via Bitcoinist.com https://bitcoinist.com April 28, 2023 at 04:14PM

[noisynutcrusade]

Binance re-enters Japan, controls over 75% of exchanges' monthly trading volume

To Binance has re-entered the Japanese market with its acquisition of Sakura Exchange BitCoin (SEBC), according to a Nov. 30 announcement. #Binance Acquires JFSA Registered Sakura Exchange BitCoin, Committed to Enter Japan Under Regulatory Compliancehttps://t.co/xfdnaY2hiO — CZ 🔶 Binance (@cz_binance) November 30, 2022 The Changpeng Zhao-led exchange revealed that it bought a 100% stake in the…

[bipiyasa]

Türkiye'deki Güvenilir Forex Şirketleri

Forex, yani Foreign Exchange (Döviz) kelime anlamı itibariyle bir para birimini başka bir para birimiyle takas etme işlemidir. Forex piyasası, dünyanın en büyük finansal piyasasıdır ve farklı ülkelerin para birimleri arasındaki değişim oranlarına dayanan spekülatif bir piyasadır. Forex piyasası, yatırımcıların para birimleri arasında alım satım işlemleri yapmalarını ve bu işlemlerden kar elde etmelerini sağlar. Forex piyasasında yatırımcılar, çeşitli para birimleri, emtialar, hisse senetleri, endeksler ve kripto paralar gibi birçok enstrümanda işlem yapabilirler. Forex piyasası, günün 24 saati açık olan bir piyasadır ve dünya genelindeki birçok banka, kurum ve yatırımcı tarafından kullanılır. Forex piyasası, yüksek likiditesi ve düşük işlem maliyetleri nedeniyle popüler bir yatırım seçeneğidir. Ancak, yüksek volatilite ve riskli fiyat dalgalanmaları nedeniyle, yatırımcıların yüksek risklerle karşılaşabileceği unutulmamalıdır. Bu nedenle, forex piyasasında işlem yapmadan önce, piyasanın özellikleri, riskleri ve potansiyel faydaları hakkında iyi bir anlayışa sahip olmak önemlidir. Güvenilir Forex Şirketleri Türkiye'de forex işlemleri, Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu (SPK) tarafından düzenlenmektedir. Bu nedenle, Türkiye'deki forex şirketleri, SPK tarafından denetlenen ve lisanslı olan şirketlerdir. İşte Türkiye'deki güvenilir forex şirketleri: - İntegral Yatırım Menkul Değerler A.Ş.: Türkiye'deki en büyük forex şirketlerinden biridir. SPK tarafından verilen lisansa sahip olan İntegral Yatırım Menkul Değerler A.Ş., müşterilerine yüksek kaliteli hizmet sunmaktadır. - GCM Forex: Türkiye'deki en popüler forex şirketlerinden biridir. SPK tarafından verilen lisansa sahip olan GCM Forex, müşterilerine güvenli ve yüksek kaliteli hizmet sunmaktadır. - Gedik Forex: SPK tarafından verilen lisansa sahip olan Gedik Forex, müşterilerine forex işlemlerinde yüksek kaliteli hizmet sunmaktadır. Şirket, müşterilerine eğitim materyalleri ve analizler de sunmaktadır. - Destek Yatırım Menkul Değerler A.Ş.: SPK tarafından verilen lisansa sahip olan Destek Yatırım Menkul Değerler A.Ş., müşterilerine forex işlemlerinde güvenli bir ortam sunmaktadır. Şirket, müşterilerine ücretsiz eğitimler de sunmaktadır. - Meksa Yatırım Menkul Değerler A.Ş.: SPK tarafından verilen lisansa sahip olan Meksa Yatırım Menkul Değerler A.Ş., müşterilerine forex işlemlerinde güvenli bir ortam sunmaktadır. Şirket, müşterilerine 5/24 destek sağlamaktadır. Bu, Türkiye'deki güvenilir forex şirketlerinden sadece birkaçıdır. Ancak, forex işlemleri yüksek riskli işlemlerdir ve yatırım yapmadan önce dikkatli bir şekilde düşünmek ve araştırmak önemlidir. Ayrıca, lisanslı bir forex şirketi seçmek ve yalnızca kaynaklarını riske atabilecekleri miktarda yatırım yapmak da önemlidir. Güvenilir Yabancı Forex Şirketleri Forex piyasasında işlem yapmak isteyenler, güvenilir bir aracı kurum seçerek işlemlerini yapmalıdır. Güvenilir yabancı Forex şirketleri arasında şunları sayabiliriz: - IG Markets: İngiltere merkezli bir Forex aracı kurumu olan IG Markets, 1974 yılında kurulmuştur ve dünya genelinde pek çok ülkede faaliyet göstermektedir. FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) tarafından denetlenmektedir. - Pepperstone: Avustralya merkezli Pepperstone, ASIC tarafından denetlenmektedir. 2010 yılında kurulan Pepperstone, dünya genelinde ödüller kazanmış bir Forex aracı kurumudur. - XTB: Varşova merkezli XTB, dünya genelinde 10 ofisi ile hizmet vermektedir. FCA ve KNF (Polonya Finansal Denetleme Otoritesi) tarafından denetlenmektedir. - eToro: İsrail merkezli eToro, sosyal ticaret özellikleri ile öne çıkan bir Forex aracı kurumudur. CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) ve FCA tarafından denetlenmektedir. - AvaTrade: İrlanda merkezli AvaTrade, ASIC, FSCA (Güney Afrika Finansal Hizmetler Kurumu) ve JFSA (Japonya Finansal Hizmetler Ajansı) tarafından denetlenmektedir. Bu aracı kurumlar, güvenilirlikleri, müşteri hizmetleri, düşük spread oranları, çeşitli varlık çiftleri ve trading platformları ile öne çıkmaktadır. Ancak, Forex piyasasında işlem yapmadan önce araştırma yapmak, aracı kurumların sunduğu hizmetleri ve özellikleri incelemek önemlidir. Bu şirketler SPK tarafından yasaklanmış olsa da, yatırımcıların herhangi bir mağduriyet yaşamaması için yine de dikkatli olmaları ve yurtdışı Forex şirketleri ile çalışırken regülatör kuruluşları, lisansları ve itibarları hakkında detaylı araştırma yapmaları önerilir. Read the full article

[cryptoonus]

Kraken Exits Japanese Market In 2023: Is This The End Of Crypto In Japan?

In a blog post published on Wednesday, crypto exchange Kraken announced that it would leave the Japanese market at the end of January 2023. The news is released as prices are still falling and market sentiment is gloomy. Kraken Japan said in a translated press release: Based on the current Japan market landscape and the downturn in the global crypto market, we concluded that it would be difficult for Kraken to invest the resources needed to further grow its Japan business. Trading Assets That Optimize Exchange Additionally, it stated that the choice aligns with Kraken's global strategy of prioritizing resources for the organization's long-term performance. Users can withdraw or transfer money until the closing date with Kraken Tokyo operator Payward Asia. The JFSA will no longer list the exchange in their register. On January 9, Kraken will stop allowing deposits into the accounts, and users can still engage in transactions to exchange their crypto assets. The exchange further stated that it would remove the withdrawal limitations in January to permit complete withdrawals. It further stated: Kraken has sufficient funding liquidity to enable all clients affected by this decision to withdraw their assets promptly. Kraken Ensures Enough Stability The promise comes a few weeks after Kraken's high (APY) and layoff announcements drew criticism from the CEO of Binance. Kraken disclosed last month that it is laying off 1,100 employees, or 30%, of its workforce. Several cryptocurrency businesses admitted to experiencing complex liquidity problems after FTX went down, and Celsius's bankruptcy and Terra LUNA's collapse in 2022 had previously rocked the market. Market capitalization lost to the cryptocurrency market over the past year is over a trillion dollars. The market capitalization of all crypto is still roughly $832 billion as of publication. In addition, Bitcoin has lost more than 75% of its value since reaching a high of $69,000 in November 2021. Related Reading | Celebrities Take A Risk With Crypto Endorsements In 2022 According to Kraken, the decision to leave Japan won't substantially impact the fund's operations. Read the full article