#its so bad that ive never actually beaten the game largely bc of it
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Not asleep yet, I was playing DQXI earlier to work on getting all the extra outfits and now my brain is filled with thoughts of Erik. Also how dirty they did him (and everyone but the Luminary) in Act 3.
EDIT: I realized I went on a very long rant in the tags. Spoilers for the game and it's post-game content in the tags.
#i have a love/hate thing with this game#acts 1 and 2 are phenominal and i love them so so so much#act 3 however makes me so dissapointed#i generally dislike when stories use a timeline reset trope to fix all the bad stuff that happened#and i particularly HATE how the writers and devs executed that trope to make act 3 happen#the idea of reseting back to act 1 isnt inherently a bad thing#but the fact that the party eventually just gets all of their power from before the reset shortly after act 3 starts is terrible#in act 2 the player explores just how deeply each party member is affected by their respective traumas#the player stands by the party and helps them through it and make things as right as they can be#not perfect but realizing that things will never be perfect is part of the journey#with e.rik in particular he has to cope with fact he coulsnt save his sister fast enough before she was tainted by evil and greed#the player helps free his sister but he still has to live with the knowledge he couldnt be there for her when she needed him most#its painfully emotional and hits all the right notes for me#act 3 erases all of that and prevents that trauma from ever happening by giving him and his sister a storybook ending#she's saved by main protagonist privilege and now the player is best bros with e.rik for life#i have no words for just how much i hate this#its so bad that ive never actually beaten the game largely bc of it#that and my will to 100% as much of the game without going into new game+ has been sapped dry until recently#the ONLY good thing to come out of act 3 is that the l.uminary is the only person to remember everything from act 2#and now he has to live with the knowledge he is an anomaly and has 0 other people who expierenced the same trauma as him#despite those people who experienced it alongside him are still in his party#v.eronica DIED in act 2 and now shes alive again in act 3 that HAS to be terrifying to the l.uminary bc shes like a dead girl walking to hi#im getting so off topic#this is supposed to be abt e.rik#uhhhh e.rik is best boy and im somehow gonna retcon all of act 3 in my au bc its stinky bad#đĄ Catch Me If You Can
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Is There Any Stopping Another Alabama-Clemson Title Game?
gfoster (Geoff Foster, sports editor): After weeks of crunching every possible playoff scenario, we finally got our two matchups for the College Football Playoff: Clemson vs. Notre Dame and Alabama vs. Oklahoma. We have to wait until Dec. 29 to see those games. But in the meantime, we have some 37 bowl games to distract us from our families over the holidays.
Letâs start with the big two. Were you surprised by the playoff selections? I think the committee avoided all of the doomsday scenarios as the conference championships played to form.
neil (Neil Paine, senior sports writer): Yeah, they mostly got out of the woods compared with some of the scenarios we talked about here. Only thing that would have helped them more would be if either Oklahoma or Ohio State lost, but that didnât happen.
To your question, I wasnât too shocked about the picks. Much was made of Georgia potentially making it, but it seemed very unlikely that theyâd take a two-loss nonconference champ over a pair of one-loss conference champs â even if UGA was probably better talent-wise. I was really only slightly surprised they took Oklahoma over the Buckeyes. If you look at the power ratings like Football Power Index or Simple Rating System, or something like ESPNâs Strength of Record, Ohio State was the superior team. But the committee probably held OSUâs strength of schedule against it â as well as that bad loss to Purdue and the near-loss against Maryland.
sara.ziegler (Sara Ziegler, general editor): It helped for the Sooners that, in the Big 12 title game, they beat the only team to have beaten them.
neil: Yes â you definitely heard the phrase âthey beat every team on the scheduleâ thrown around.
sara.ziegler: And I feel like the committee members had Ohio Stateâs near-loss to Maryland on their minds.
(I know I did.)
Josh Planos (Josh Planos, contributor): I wasnât all that surprised either. Three were shoe-ins, and if the playoff format has taught us anything itâs that most of college footballâs elite programs hog all the playoff spots, and the committee will do everything in its power to eschew controversy. Ohio State certainly wasnât lacking in that department this season.
gfoster: Oddly, I think blowing out Michigan in such ugly fashion actually hurt Ohio State, because most people seemed to write off that game (rightly) as UM being overrated rather than Ohio State beating a team ranked fourth in the country.
neil: And yet the Wolverines were allowed to (easily) be Notre Dameâs most signature winâŠ
sara.ziegler: Notre Dame getting its special dispensation, as per usual.
neil: It was funny during the selection show to hear the note about how Vegas would have the Irish as underdogs against every other team in the playoff conversation (except UCF, I guess).
Josh Planos: During Northwesternâs third-quarter scoring run on Saturday night, while Gus Johnson was firing off catch phrases, you could almost hear the committee scratching out the Buckeyes. Would a 40-point win in the Big Ten championship game even have gotten Ohio State over Georgia?
gfoster: Last year, if it hadnât lost to Stanford, Notre Dame could have easily finished the season with one loss and would have not have made the playoff. In that spot, not having a conference championship would have really worked against the Irish because they wouldnât have had another opportunity for a signature win. But this year, we see the advantage for ND. Win all your regular season games, as easy as they may be, and you are in.
But likewise, Northwestern didnât really give Ohio State much of a resume boost. So ⊠itâs Wisconsinâs fault for being lousy I guess.
sara.ziegler: But of course, Geoff, thatâs only the case for ND â not for any other non-Power Five teams. (:cry: UCF)
gfoster: UCF needs to boost its strength of schedule if it wants to be taken seriously.
sara.ziegler: For sure. And I donât think the Knights should have gotten in. But itâs not like Notre Dameâs schedule was off the charts.
gfoster: For all we knock ND, they are playing teams like NC State, USC, Syracuse â all of whom would be one of the hardest games on UCFâs schedule.
neil: How can they improve their SOS, short of joining a better conference? (Or is that basically it?)
I donât think any real power team wants to play them nonconference. No upside there, only downside.
gfoster: You could get a mid-tier Power-Five team that would take them at home, no? When Notre Dame was playing Michigan in Week 1, UCF had UConn â quite possibly the worst team in FBS.
neil: Defensively, at least.
sara.ziegler: Though that UConn game was a conference game.
Josh Planos: They followed it up by playing South Carolina State, too.
sara.ziegler: They scheduled North Carolina, but that was canceled because of the hurricane.
gfoster: North Carolina is also terrible.
sara.ziegler: And thatâs the other problem: You can schedule a mid-tier Power-Five team, but you canât guarantee theyâll be good.
neil: Or if youâre Notre Dame, you can schedule prestige Power 5 teams and not know if theyâll be good.
sara.ziegler: UCF did schedule and beat Pitt, which was good enough to get trampled by Clemson in the ACC title game.
gfoster: Truth is, maybe UCF does need to move conferences? TCU managed to do that when it was facing similar problem.
sara.ziegler: Or we could solve this with an eight-team playoff!
neil: This.^^
gfoster: Well, yes.
sara.ziegler: Solve it for this year, anyway.
LOL
gfoster: NO ONE is against that.
neil: Except conference and university presidents.
gfoster: As for this year, this is the first time both playoff games have double-digit spreads. Which falls in line with some lopsided lines in the conference championships. Any reason to like the underdogs here?
Or is this destined for Clemson vs. Alabama again?
neil: Maybe if Tua is still hurt? (He wonât be. And they will destroy Oklahoma.)
sara.ziegler: And itâs hard to see Notre Dame doing much against Clemson.
neil: Clemson vs. Bama Part IV is pretty redundant at this point. But at least thereâs a chance it doesnât play out according to chalk. Under the old BCS system, theyâd automatically be slotted in at 1-2. (Although that would have been very uncontroversial.)
gfoster: Itâs hard to see any team doing much against the Tigersâ defense. Look at the line of Pitt QB Kenny Pickett in the ACC title game: 4 of 16 for ⊠wait for it ⊠8 YARDS.
Thatâs 0.5 yards per pass attempt. (538 math skills, folks.)
Josh Planos: Yeah, we donât know about Tuaâs health. Oklahomaâs offense puts up video game numbers, so youâd expect Alabama to need to bring at least something to the table in that regard. Trevor Lawrence is playing the best secondary heâs seen all season. Brian Kelly is probably pretty motivated that his teamâs recent struggles were broadcast on a Showtime series.
sara.ziegler: If Tua plays, you gotta think heâll go to town on the Oklahoma defense.
Will he actually have to play all four quarters? LOL
Josh Planos: Have we ever seen the likely two top vote-getters in the Heisman race square off in the postseason? Is this the best QB battle in terms of single-season QBR that weâve ever seen? Each is on pace to set the single-season record (though that will change, Iâm sure).
gfoster: It might not change for Tua against that Oklahoma defense that gave up 700 yards to West Virginia.
The Sooners also might be without their best receiver: Marquise âHollywoodâ Brown, which would be a significant blow to Kyler Murray.
neil: Josh, we almost got 1-2 Heisman QBs in the 2008 title game: Tebow vs. Bradford.
(But Tebow finished 3rd in the voting.)
(Colt McCoy finished 2nd????)
sara.ziegler: Wow
gfoster: If we had an eight-team playoff, my guess is that it would be Alabama-UCF (lol), Clemson-Washington (Iâm thinking they must include a token Pac-12 in this new world), Notre Dame-Ohio State, Oklahoma-Georgia.
neil: What would the line be on that Tide-vs.-Knights game?
gfoster: 28.5
Josh Planos: Without McKenzie Milton? 30+
neil: Isnât that the same line they gave the Buffalo Bills vs. Alabama?
gfoster: The Bills are like the sixth worst team in the NFL now. Shows how misguided those types of stories are.
sara.ziegler: Would a Pac-12 team even make an eight-team playoff this year? The committee had Michigan at No. 7.
Which is kind of amazing â another two-loss Power-Five team above poor UCF.
neil: I would guess an eight-team playoff would have an automatic berth for a Pac-12 champ.
sara.ziegler: Thereâs obviously no way to do this without some controversy.
neil: Then we can get into those fun March Madness arguments about âat-largeâ bids.
gfoster: Right ⊠and one token non-Power Five. (Or in this case two, because of ND.)
neil: Notre Dame is Power Five! (According to our tier system.)
gfoster: Letâs talk about the other bowl games. Any others you are particularly excited for?
neil: UGA-Texas should be fun, I think.
Josh Planos: Maybe itâs because Iâm a sucker for the nostalgia of Big 8 football, but Missouri vs. Oklahoma State. FPI is really high on the four-loss Tigers (like, higher on the Tigers than UCF and LSU), and each of Oklahoma Stateâs past five games have been decided by no more than 7 points. If nothing else, there will be a lot of points.
sara.ziegler: Missouri never should have left the Big 12.
neil: I always forget they arenât in the Big 12 now.
sara.ziegler: Wisconsin vs. Miami in the Pinstripe Bowl is kind of a fun throwback.
gfoster: That should be called the Pinstripe Lack Of Motivation Bowl.
sara.ziegler: Haha
Josh Planos: Fun is an interesting word.
Is this the underachieving bowl? And did any team underachieve more than Wisconsin? All we heard throughout the preseason was that Jonathan Taylor could win the Heisman, they returned the entire offensive line, and Alex Hornibrook was returning for a 12th year of eligibility.
gfoster: In the bowl games, itâs always fun to identify the games where one team is really pumped to be there and the other has zero interest. For instance, Purdue vs. Auburn in the Music City.
You think Auburn is getting up for that?
Josh Planos: If they couldnât get up to bully UCF last year, theyâre not getting up to try and corral Rondale Moore.
neil: Also, the biggest early spread in a lower-tier bowl might be the Famous Idaho Potato Bowl. ESPN has BYU as a 14-point favorite over Western Michigan
I always root for the Directional Michigans though.
gfoster: Sad that Alabama-Oklahoma might be the most lopsided bowl game.
Also a 14-point spread.
sara.ziegler: Iâm actually pretty interested in how UCF does against LSU.
LSU is a good proxy for a playoff team, since the Tigers did OK against Bama (at least early on) and pounded Georgia.
gfoster: I actually think LSU will get up for UCF, mainly because of what happened to Auburn and all this chatter.
neil: Although I wish UCF had gotten one of the just-missed-it playoff contenders like UGA or Ohio State, just for experimentâs sake.
sara.ziegler: Yeah, that would have been better.
Though maybe itâs all moot with no Milton.
neil: True. It wouldnât have settled the debate.
gfoster: LSU is actually still playing that game against Texas A&M. They are in their 134th overtime.
sara.ziegler: :football: :zzz:
gfoster: But Neil, didnât we see kinda see that the year they let Hawaii play UGA?
neil: Hah, yes I was thinking of that exactly. Poor Colt Brennan.
Josh Planos: Shouldâve known that a haircut like this didnât stand a chance.
gfoster: OMG
sara.ziegler: Why ⊠would ⊠you ⊠do ⊠that?
gfoster: He even has the little island that they donât let anyone on.
neil: The run-n-shoot makes you do crazy things.
gfoster: OK, whatâs the worst bowl game.
This answer is two parts.
Worst name and worst game.
neil: Bad Boy Mowers Gasparilla Bowl
Can anything top that?
Short of bringing back the Poulan Weed Eater Bowl?
sara.ziegler: I love the Boca Raton Bowl.
Congrats, teams! Youâre going to ⊠Boca Raton!
gfoster: Thatâs the Cheribundi Boca Raton Bowl, Sara.
Josh Planos: Best bowl experience: The Makers Wanted Bahamas Bowl, FIU vs. Toledo.
Last season, folks could bring beer into the stadium. There were also archery opportunities near the concession stand.
I apologize for not answering the question, Geoff.
neil: I do miss the Popeyeâs sponsorship for that one. Gave us an excuse to pick up fried chicken at Times Square and eat it in the office.
sara.ziegler: As if you needed an excuse for that, Neil.
neil: (Sorry again about the spicy tenders, Geoff.)
gfoster: The DXL Frisco Bowl is a rare short name that is terrible.
Jared Birmingham Bowl? It sounds like its named after someone named Jared Birmingham.
neil: I think âJared Birminghamâ is UCFâs backup QB.
Josh Planos: LOL
gfoster: I will say. Iâm a big fan of the Cheez-It Bowl
I wish I had a bowl of Cheez-Its right now.
sara.ziegler: We didnât talk about the best game of the weekend.
neil: Iowa State!
sara.ziegler: A dominant (not at all) win over powerhouse (not at all) Drake!
Josh Planos: I think Washington State could beat Iowa State by 40 points. Or the Cyclones could ride the Matt Campbell relevancy train to a 13-10 win.
sara.ziegler: Thatâs quite a range.
neil: And nothing in between.
sara.ziegler: LOL
neil: Iâm also kinda intrigued by the Peach Bowl: Michigan vs. Florida. Feels like that is a constant matchup in the tier of bowls just below the prestige level.
That has happened in many Citrus Bowls, for instance.
Josh Planos: How. Do. These. Teams. Keep. Playing.
gfoster: Harbaughâs only bowl win at Michigan was a romp of Florida. And Lloyd Carrâs final win was an upset of Tim Tebow Florida.
neil: And donât forget about the 2003 Outback Bowl!
sara.ziegler: Who can forget?
neil: Grossman vs. Navarre.
gfoster: Iâm excited for West Virginia vs. Syracuse in the Camping World. That feels like a 100-point game. I also am oddly interested in Boca Raton bowl! UAB is an amazing story. They won Conference USA just a few years removed from having their football program eliminated.
Itâs at this time where Iâd normally ask for predictions. But I imagine no one is picking an upset in the first two playoff games?
So letâs skip to the final predictions.
sara.ziegler: Itâs pretty hard to pick against Alabama.
neil: Alabama 27, Clemson 24
sara.ziegler: Clemson has been dominant, obviously, ever since squeaking by Syracuse. But Bama is just too good.
Alabama 30, Clemson 18
gfoster: Clemson 35, Alabama 28
This isnât (entirely) me being the contrarian. I think the Crimson Tide are kinda vulnerable to an upset. They start slow every game (tied with Citadel at halftime, remember) and itâs going to catch up to them at some point. Clemson defense can keep Tua off the field enough to win.
(Assuming they beat ND, who I think will make a game of it against Clemson.)
Josh Planos: Alabama over Oklahoma 35-14
Clemson over Notre Dame 21-7
Alabama over Clemson 28-14
sara.ziegler: I guess thereâs nothing left to do but watch the games!
from News About Sports https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/is-there-any-stopping-another-alabama-clemson-title-game/
0 notes