#ironically still only seen the first 1 one time sk far!!!

[aew-regression-cove]

m definitely not watchin topgun maverick again 😶 definitely nottt :3

[notimeliketoday]

bitchbrows replied to your post “bitchbrows replied to your post ““Sakura is a doormat for Sasuke””...”

Bevause your last oost had panels of sakura and sasuke pre timeskip and for karin & sasuke, shippuden. Obviously theres no competition now with the forced ships canon. You know very well Sakura went in like a fool using ONLY a kunai as her weapon. Why even bother with that? She didnt use her strength and pretty much jumped in on q suicide mission literally after an insensitive fake confession to Naruto whom knew she was bullshitting so her plan b was to smokebomb..m 3 trusted comrades to go over to sasuke and AGAIN fake a join up with him kinda deal which horribly backfired to the point where she had to be saved twice by her sensei and naruto. Karin doesnt have that luxury, she only had herself in tat situation and is not friends with anyone. Maybe if she lived a normal life like sakura and the other rookies, she would know whats behavior is morale and know how to proper consider others. Sakura was too self absorbed With her feelings and its sad when even sasuke acknowledges how shit of a reason she has to love him and visa versa. Saying that to her face and team 7. Compared to karin who had more solid reason because lets not forget she was saved by him in a flashback that was done by the bridge which from then her feelings grew. I dont ship neither, its more so sasuke x alone. But some of yall ss shippers are horrible at attempting to glorify ss thats already by degrading karin. Sakura to this day, in boruto has shown no backbone by opposing Sasuke or even confronting. What happened at bridge cant even be oconsidered that because she couldnt even bring herself to do it and its utter foolishness. Karin was even watching half dead hoping he wouodnt kill sakura, a stranger somewhat to karin. If there waant any competition, why feel the need to oppose sasukarin fandom with petty posts to degrade a threat to your ship. Karin isnt made to be a fighter ninja like sakura. Shes purely sensory, she knows what she can and cant do as sakura proven otherwise in her own case. But anyway, stop waating your time and act like a decent ss fan. Go look at ss fanart, rebl9g and whatever. No need to go shitting on smaller fandoms. Its pretty pathetic.

And? It still doesn’t change the fact that she stood up against Sasuke. What on blazes are you talking about? Sakura was even the first person to tell Sasuke to man up and stop acting like a coward against Orochimaru. And yes, there is no competition. You just got it wrong. It’s not forced ship when we already have part 1 to support us while Karin never got any important moment to justify your ship outside a one-sided lust and not really comparable moments of concern to Sakura’s love. Oh? So now you are adding unimportant bits? We are discussing how Sakura stood up to Sasuke, why are you bringing up Sakura’s desperate attempt to save her teammates? And why are you nitpicking the fact that she just went on a suicide mission by herself? Oh that’s right, because you don’t have any real defense for Karin. And so what if Karin was alone? Sasuke wouldn’t descend as badly as he did to darkness if she had the guts to STAND UP TO HIM which she is a coward not to do. So she is in a way responsible why Sasuke got so out of hand. She didn’t stop him. Period. She didn’t stood up against him when he needed it the most. And hon, we are not here for the headcanons. We are here for canon and manga facts. Canon facts dictate Karin is a horrible character even Suigetsu is her victim, period.

So you create a headcanon that Karin may not be as cruel as she is if given the right opportunity to grow up with the Rookie 9 but you demean canon Sakura by calling her self-absorbed? Kishi emphasized Sakura’s selflessness and kindness many times. What drugs are you on? I’m curious. 😂 😂 😂 😂

Aww.... it’s so pathetic that Karin has to have a reason to love Sasuke. By that logic, she really didn’t love him for who he is rather for what he did for her. Her love is fake then. Thanks for confirming! 😂 😂 😂 😂  And stop playing the neutral party. Bitch, you’re clearly a SK fan. Don’t try to deceive people here. I’ve seen you lurking in the SS tag and blogs and bash them at any opportunity. And you dare call yourself neutral? Wew, and I’m a long-lost princess of the British monarchy. 😂 😂 😂 😂 

Besides, we don’t need to degrade a character who’s already degrading herself just fine without our help. 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

I can give lots of Sakura moments standing up to Sasuke as far back as part 1 when she was weak and not much of a ninja. Even removing the bridge will still have many others to stand in its place. As far as I’m concerned, the one panel I gave where Sakura stands up to for Naruto against Sasuke also happens in Land of Iron too, the very same bridge you’re so adamant in discrediting.

Sakura tried again to kill him but couldn’t because of her feelings. If she couldn’t stand up to him, she wouldn’t entertain the idea of trying to stop him much less contemplate the idea of killing him to stop his misery once and for all. How many times must I drill that into your thick skull?

Trust me on this hon. We don’t see SK as actual competition. It was never in the running. But it sure is entertaining to debunk your silly misinformation, twisted facts and delusional ramblings with manga and canon facts.

Yeah, thanks for confirming Karin is weak. 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂  Thanks for confirming she never stood up against Sasuke. At least you’re consistent on that one. 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

Why don’t you try to be a decent SK shipper and stop lurking in the anti tags. Do what you advice and keep them to yourself. I don’t need to read such from a hypocritical, double-crossing wolf in a sheep’s clothing.

I’m calling BS on you.

[tbulman57]

BEST NEW WAYS TO LOSE WEIGHT IN YOUR FACE

How can the female with fat face do? What reasons cause female's face fat? Here is a specific look.

The first reason of the fat face is: facial edema. Blood and lymph circulation is bad; water metabolism will diminish, so that the waste water accumulate in vivo, and finally form the swollen in the face and eyelids.

The rescue strategy: first, to keep plenty of regular sleep, and it is appropriate that sleep pillow height is higher than the supine position; second, in the two hours before going to sleep, do not eat salty foods or drink wine; third, every day use the warm water of temperature about 40 to bath for 20 minutes or more; fourth, usually intake more foods of some diuretic effect or potassium foods, such as beans, spinach, bananas, watermelon and sweet potato, etc, to reduce water retention in the body; fifth, strength the muscle and intake the foods rich in vitamin E or iron, such as green vegetables, soy germ class food and so on to promote blood circulation; sixth, regular massage to stimulate the facial circulation, and digest edema.

The second reason leading to the fat face is: the accumulation of fat. Cheeks are bulging round, fleshy and strong, and the facial line profile is not clear, like round chubby bread, is a real fat face. Cheek portion of subcutaneous fat accumulation, expression of muscle recession is the reasons causing facial obesity and nebulous outline.

The rescue strategy: first, usually try to keep upright, healthy posture, and talk more, as well as communicate with the outside world by more facial expressions; second, often do some simple facial movement, such as repeat grin smile, tooting mouth, and plumping the cheeks and so on; third, eat more of the leaves and stems of the crude fiber vegetables, and when eat, you should chew the food slowly to exercise the face muscles stretch; forth, every day use cold and hot water alternately attaining or washing your face, reducing the cellulite; fifth, every day do the action of looking up the head, looking down the head, turning around the head, and the level of turning the head to rid of the rounded fat at the origin of the chin.

In addition, the third reason is muscle relaxation. Increasing age brought about the regeneration of functional decline, as well as overexposure to the sun makes the dermal layer of cellulose and collagen content reduced skin elasticity, and is no longer tight. So, we should attention to the sun; do not smoke; eat more fruits and vegetables rich in vitamin C.

Ways to Reduce Are up against Fat

1. Ultrasound treatments

This process is key nowadays. Of course via cloture. used inside cosmetic discipline. The "ultrasound machine" may help to melt that fat below the skin to your face. Of course, you won't hurt many other cells and tissues on the face. Nevertheless, you ought to consult a healthcare provider before you head for this procedure.

2. Staying on a diet

Let us discuss something can be done without applying any "machine". Nevertheless, you will probably need to consider fat-loss for the whole body. You can for a start consider one's dieting approach. Make sure that you do not get any processed food. You may well consume more fruits. Of course, it's also wise to stay far away from foods that happen to be too fat.

3. Cardio

This could possibly be a most challenging part. Most people cannot stay on our training plan. Nevertheless, aerobic exercises can certainly help us to give up fat quite simply. Of course, it will help want you to lose that fat on the fact. You may become healthier if you possibly can have that habit with exercising on a daily basis. As an outcome, you ought to try to experience a solid training plan you will still are not looking to lose body fat.

4. Makeup exercises

It's possible to have some makeup exercises. There are men and women that maintain that such a exercises do not provide help to lose makeup fat. Nevertheless, there are some men and women that can drop the fats with each other. As an outcome, you should do it while you are asking that question "how to lower face fat". The exercises do not harm you after the wedding of when real.

5. Appetite Suppressants

Again, appetite suppressants can provide help to lose your system fast. You certainly will become trim down easily for it. Of course, a site is losing that person fat while doing so. As an outcome, you ought to use a lot of these pills absolutely help reduce are up against fat.

Today, you should recognize how to reduce are up against fat. Don't forget, when you will be choosing the diet pills, you have to find the best solutions. You ought to read a couple pounds Loss Product Review so as to understand the employment and performance of several products.

Three Most Effective Tips For Quick Face Fat Loss

Yet, you would possibly not really know ways to relieve fats on the face. The fact recommendations that usually there are some ways to perform so. In this post, I might layout 3 tips that you lose that unwanted body fat on are up against.

How to take out face body fat

1. Can be done some makeup exercises. Several of men and women that can drop the body fat efficiently with the exercises. Of course, there are some men and women that say these exercises don't work. Nevertheless, you are not required to worry an excessive amount of that will. The exercises will let you firm your muscle tissue anyway. Consequently, it is going to do you good after the wedding of when real.

2. Furthermore, you will drink a whole lot of water avoiding having coffees. You ought to probably would like to know why you must avoid taking in coffee. The reason is you might just get hold of cellulite as soon as you drink coffees. You ought to avoid experiencing coffee if you need to get rid of face body fat. Drinking water may help to reduce one's hunger.

And you will usually tend to eat a lower number of foods after mineral water. It will likewise help not to lose your calorie burning. This is the reason why drinking water can certainly help. To the following end, drinking water is undoubtedly a resolution for the issue how to take out face body fat.

3. You can not drive your car. Instead, it's best to walk even more. The idea recommendations that it will help you to extend your process level. And it will boost one's metabolism. This will trigger fat loss after the wedding of when real.

Apart from in the above, you will likewise want to look at some diet pills absolutely help lose that fat. Also, you must use the best supplements. This will make certain you will deprivation the unwelcome fats on the face properly.

So, be sure to study some product critiques so as to choose the most effective Diet pills for wanting you to lose body fat and unwelcome fats.

How to Lose Face Fat and Double Chin?

Do you want to lose face fat? Having puffy cheeks could be annoying to some people, so I have laid out some tips for you to implement today.

Most of us want to exercise hard and get the body fat down so that we look great and can fit into some of the sexy clothes that you see celebrities dressed into.

There are some simple exercises, which help a person get that fat off his face. If a celebrity expects quick results then he should organize himself mentally as losing fat from the face is not as easy as putting it on.

If for some, hair is the most important, for everyone, the face is the most important part of the body. This is for the reason that almost everyone would really love to have a perfectly beautiful face.

That is why if they found out that there is something wrong with their face or that fats are already noticeable in the face then they will for sure look some ways on how to lose face fat.

Causes

What is a Double Chin: A double chin is a phenomenon caused by a layer of subcutaneous fat around the neck that sags down and creates a wrinkle, making the owner appear to have a second chin.

There are 3 main causes of excess fat under the chin which is age, genetics and obesity. It is most common on people who are elderly or obese.

So you comprise noticed that you are in advance weight. Well, you can hide fats in your arms, belly and legs by simply dressing up. But you can on no account hide your twice over chin.

This is one sign that you have gained weight and no matter how you dress up, your double chin will always show.

Symptom

First Important. The body only absorbs 5% of vitamins from pills or capsules the rest is sent down the toilet. Discover how you can absorb 98%. Look at the bottom of this page.

Vitamin deficiency symptoms. Torment is among the leading factors behind vitamin inadequacies as folks suffering don't have access to healthy food that contain the essential vitamins or water in the diet wished to maintain correct hydration thru the body.

Alive ax allows your body to absorb 98% of vitamins plus is probably one of the best top 10 network marketing companies (so you can make part time or full time money) and has the best products I've seen on the internet. Have a look at Alivemax. The original article Vitamin deficiency symptom is here.

Home Remedies

Do you have fat deposit on your face and chin area? Do you fancy to get rid of them? You have come to the right editorial. Read this article and find how you can lose face fat and double chin with no operation.

Do you have fat deposit on your face and chin area? Do you want to get rid of them? You have come to the right article. Read this article and find how you can lose face fat and double chin without surgery.

That is why if they found out that there is amazing wrong with their face or that fats are already clear in the face then they will for sure look some ways on how to lose face fat.

The first tip to lose face fat is to avoid salty foods. Excessive salty foods can lead to water retention, which can eventually result in puffy eyes. And puffy eyes can make your face look fatter. So limit your salt drinking in order to lose your facial fat.

Keyword: - lose double chin , double chin exercises, chin exercises, double chin surgery , Photoshop double chin, exercise double chin , remove double chin , reduce double chin , double chin removal, double chin surgery

Vital Diet Tips to Burn Fat In The Face And Achieve Younger Skin

Most people would agree that the worst problem associated with weight gain and obesity is facial fat. It is the only place where you cannot hide fat under garments, and the one place where fat makes you look older than you actually are. Here are some diet tips that will help you burn fat in the face and make you look younger in a matter of weeks.

Why Your Face Looks Puffy and Fat

To begin with, a puffy face is not the result of accumulated fat only. Loose and saggy skin also means that you skin tissues have lost some of their elasticity. This is premature aging brought on by the presence of toxins in your body and hormonal imbalances.

As far as actual facial fat is concerned, the two places it accumulates are just below your chin and in your cheeks. You needn't worry, though! With the right diet, you will be able to lose face fat, and get brighter, younger and firmer skin as well.

Omit Processed Foods

Processed and packaged foods are filled with chemicals and toxic additives, which you will not be able to identify on typical nutritional labels. However, these are largely responsible for hormonal imbalances and symptoms of premature aging. Natural, raw and unprocessed foods, on the other hand, are rich in minerals and antioxidants, and they help flush out your system and prevent toxin buildups.

Include Fruits and Vegetables

This is one of the major reasons why health and nutrition experts constantly advise that you add more fruits and vegetables to your diet. There is no food source richer in vital minerals and vitamins than a balanced intake of different seasonal fruits and vegetables.

Besides, fruits and vegetables are rich in fiber and low in calories, which are major factors when you are trying to lose face fat fast. The fiber will keep you full, and the low calorie density will ensure you don't overeat. As a result, you are more likely to consume less calories than you burn, and your body will then start to burn its reserves of fat from everywhere, including your face.

Drink Water

Water is a cleansing agent, and it flushes deadly toxins out of your body and keeps you replenished and hydrated at all times. Simply put, a toxin-free body is the only secret behind young, firm and glowing skin, and it is not possible to achieve, unless you drink enough water. All your efforts to lose face fat will amount to nothing, unless your skin looks tight and healthy in the first place.

That's not all, however. If you are dehydrated, your body may interpret thirst as hunger, and that causes you to overeat. Besides, a dehydrated body has a sluggish metabolism. So, by depriving yourself of water, you are consuming more calories, and burning less. To lose face fat fast, you need just the reverse! Make sure you drink 7-9 tall glasses of water everyday.

Don't Ignore Proteins

Finally, lean proteins should be a vital component of your diet, if you are looking to lose face fat. Proteins help maintain and build muscle in your body, especially if you are doing some form of exercise. Muscle speeds up your metabolism and helps you burn through fat reserves faster. The best sources of protein are soy, lentils, beans and legumes, eggs, dairy, chicken and fish.

If you can practice these diet tips, you should be able to burn fat in the face and achieve a glowing, healthy skin before you turn a year older!

from Blogger http://ift.tt/2w6LGxw via IFTTT

[nofomoartworld]

Hyperallergic: Incorporating Photography into Art History, Starting with August Sander

August Sander, Group for Sherrie Levine Composed by Gerd Sander in 2012 (1911–40, printed 1976–83), portfolio of 36 photographs, gelatin silver prints (© Die Photographische Sammlung/SK Stiftung Kultur — August Sander Archive, Cologne, ARS, New York; courtesy of Galerie Julian Sander, Cologne; photo by Timothy Doyon)

The exhibition Serialities, presented by Hauser & Wirth and organized with art dealer Olivier Renaud-Clément, is built around the photographic works of August Sander. Born in 1876 in Herdorf, Germany, Sander is commonly thought of as the most significant portrait photographer of the early 20th century. His photographs are posed, his sitters self-conscious, and his images printed in black and white from glass plate negatives. His project People of the Twentieth Century strove to catalogue all of the types of persons living in his proximity during his lifetime.

The aspiration to photograph the People of the Twentieth Century isn’t far removed from the conceptual artist Douglas Huebler’s ambition “to photographically document the existence of everyone alive” or, for that matter, from Taryn Simon’s A Living Man Declared Dead and Other Chapters I–XVIII (2008–11), which traces bloodlines. Retrospectively, it is easy to see in Sander’s work the germ of some of the most important photo-based projects that have followed. The exhibition, Serialities appears to want, once and for all, to drag photography out of isolation and contextualize it within the larger framework of art making.

One saw tentative steps in this direction when the Whitney Museum reopened in its new home with the exhibition America Is Hard to See. Although photographs were still generally sequestered in their own rooms, they were contextualized as part of a larger history rather than being presented as an entirely separate enterprise. It is true that, for decades, certain individual photographers have been considered artists. Many of the Pictures Generation would fall into that category, including Cindy Sherman and Louise Lawler, who are both represented in Serialities (although the latter not by her photographic work). And yet the distinction persists, such that Cindy Sherman is deemed an artist and Garry Winogrand, a photographer. This discrimination also affects price points in the marketplace: artists have more value than photographers, even if the artist’s work is entirely photo based.

Sherrie Levine, “After August Sander” (2012) (© Sherrie Levine; courtesy the artist, David Zwirner, and Hauser & Wirth; photo by Timothy Doyon)

The exhibition sets about its project of integration in several interesting ways. The most striking is to hang Sherrie Levine’s “After August Sander” (2012) — a series in which Levine rephotographed 18 images from Sander’s work People Who Came to My Door, part of his larger effort to document those living around him — in a gallery adjacent to the one containing Sander’s original work. The conversation about Levine’s remarkable project is largely familiar to us now, but the pairing reminds us that, ironically, appropriating the images of other photographers conferred an originality on those works — one that had been long withheld, in part because they had been seen as the products of a mechanical process and theoretically able to be multiplied ad infinitum. Originality was, for a long time, the preserve of painters.

August Sander, People of the 20th Century. People Who Came to My Door (1926–32, printed 1990), portfolio of 12 photographs, gelatin silver prints (© Die Photographische Sammlung/SK Stiftung Kultur — August Sander Archive, Cologne, ARS, New York; courtesy Galerie Julian Sander, Cologne; photo by Timothy Doyon)

In Levine’s work we also see indexicality turned in on itself. She reproduces the photograph not by creating a new print from an existing negative, but by rephotographing a photograph and then claiming authorship of the new image. This is now so common we barely notice it, but when Levine first presented the work, it was seen by many as scandalous. The underlying assumptions of these two bodies of work differ — we would generally refer to Sander as modern and Levine as postmodern. Yet if we simply stand inside the galleries and look at them, what we see is not so different. Both have been created through indexical reproduction. And while the disavowal of authorship and the artist’s hand was a big rhetorical point for postmodern art, it is not clear that it was Levine’s purpose; she may not even be critiquing the aura of the original artwork in the liberatory fashion deduced from Walter Benjamin’s “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” (1936), or commenting on the absurdity of an endlessly reproducible original. Maybe, to the contrary, what she cared about most was claiming for herself and other women the same rights and benefits of authorship that are granted to men. This is not a new assertion, but her early work was written about largely by men, who stressed the postmodern ideas over the feminist ones.

Robert Kinmont, “Just about the right size” (1970/2008), nine silver gelatin prints (© Robert Kinmont; courtesy the artist, Alexander and Bonin; and Hauser & Wirth; photo by Timothy Doyon)

Indexicality, was of course, fundamental to pre-digital photography: the image was created directly from the light reflected onto the negative from whatever stood in front of the camera lens. With the exception of Peter Galassi’s anti-intuitive observation in his book Before Photography: Painting and the Invention of Photography, that landscape photographers learned from landscape painters, photography has always been over-identified with its mechanical means. Yet it is exactly that ability to record something existing in time and space that gives photography its pathos. And seriality and indexicality became more closely intertwined with the advent of the form, because photography makes repetition easier.

Seriality traverses art history, from high modern iterations such as Barnett Newman’s The Stations of the Cross: lema sabachthani (1958–66) to the Minimalist rejection of embellishment and illusion and on to the postmodern appropriation of mass media as a form of critique. This exhibition examines where seriality intersects with indexicality, mostly in photographic works that fall on either side of the modern–postmodern divide by practitioners who aren’t necessarily considered photographers. These decisions diminish the gap between what is seen as traditional photography, with its own unique history, and those works that have already been accepted into the history of art.

Robert Kinmont, “This is my Hand” (1970), 10 silver gelatin prints (© Robert Kinmont; courtesy the artist, Alexander and Bonin, and Hauser & Wirth; photo by Timothy Doyon)

Robert Kinmont, for instance, would fall more readily into the conceptual artist category, someone for whom the physical object or photograph might be referred to as a documentation of his ideas. But, akin to Roman Opalka, who is also in the exhibition, his objects have begun to have a life of their own. In “Just about the right size” (1970/2008), Kinmont has documented himself in a series of nine modestly scaled, black-and-white photographs, standing full body in front of the camera and holding a different object in his hands in each: a shovel, a dead fish, a shoe. There is a guilelessness and optimism in these photographs that betrays their modernity — they represent a time when the zeitgeist was one of grand narratives and all-encompassing explanations, and when the universal still meant “white male.” In “This is my Hand” (1970), serial photographs of Kinmont’s hand and forearm remind us that the some of the earliest indexical images were the tracings of hands found in the caves of Chauvet, Lascaux, and Altamira. The first uses of indexicality converge with photography and take advantage of the ease of repetition, all at once.

Roni H0rn, Portrait of an Image (with Isabelle Huppert) (2005), 50 photographs (© Roni Horn, courtesy the artist and Hauser & Wirth, photo by Genevieve Hanson)

In the tradition of the serial painting, in which the slightest nuance or change is rendered from one work to the next, Roni Horn’s Portrait of an Image (with Isabelle Huppert) (2005) consists of 50 color photographs of Isabelle Huppert. Horn captures subtle shifts in her expression from close-up to close-up, creating an image bank of expressions that are the stock and trade of actors. Here we get not only the self-consciousness of sitters that we saw in Sander’s work, but our own awareness that the posing is being done by a professional performer, who is completely aware of every aspect of her performance. Comparing these images to Kinmont’s makes his work look all the more flush with the false innocence of modernity.

While Roman Opalka can be viewed as a conceptualist, he worked primarily as a painter who cared about materiality as a form. He is represented in the exhibition by just one of his number paintings, as well as by a sound piece in which he recites those numbers and by three close-up photographs of his face (selected from many), shot over a significant period of time. The last, beautiful and stark black-and-white images which read as mostly white, act out Roland Barthes’s observation that the photograph represents the catastrophe to come, that it documents he or she who will one day be dead. They bear a resemblance to Roni Horn’s documentation of shifting gestures but are more emphatic about the passage of time. Postmodernism may be a path to the loss of innocence, but facing one’s own mortality is another.

Roman Opalka, “OPALKA 1965/1 – ∞, Détail – Photo 3685005” and “OPALKA 1965/1 – ∞, Détail – Photo 278723,” both gelatin silver prints (courtesy Lévy Gorvy and Hauser & Wirth)

Cindy Sherman is perhaps the most hybrid artist in the show, in that she is part of the history of photography but also incorporated into the history of art. She is represented by four very early works: “Cover Girl (Vogue)” (1975/2011), “Cover Girl (Family Circle)” (1975/2011), “Cover Girl (Redbook)” (1975/2011), and “Untitled (Line-Up)” (1977/2011). These pieces, like much of her work, critique the media and the way representation is deployed throughout our culture — the reason she is considered an emblematic figure in the advent of postmodernism. Yet, unlike other artists of her generation, including Richard Prince or Sherrie Levine, she has always indexed herself to create her work. In that sense she has a kinship with Kinmont. But while he holds up simple objects for contemplation, Sherman holds up media representations. In that way, she straddles the modern–postmodern divide and creates a bridge between the works that have been segregated into the history of photography and those that have been accepted into art history. And from there, it is not hard to see the connections between an artist like Sander, documenting all of the human beings he comes into contact with, and one like On Kawara, also in the exhibition, documenting each passing day in the form of a painting.

Cindy Sherman, “Untitled (Line-Up)” (1977/2011), 12 gelatin silver prints (© Cindy Sherman; courtesy the artist, Metro Pictures, New York, and Hauser & Wirth)

The argument of the exhibition — that photography should take its rightful place within art history — is borne out by the fact that Sander’s photographs do not feel out of place side by side with other, later photographs, or with  drawings by David Smith or constructions by Sol Lewitt. They seem to be part of the same complex history, which is bigger, more unwieldy, and harder to theorize than the “history of photography” will allow.

Serialities continues at Hauser & Wirth (548 W 22nd Street, Chelsea, Manhattan) through April 8.

The post Incorporating Photography into Art History, Starting with August Sander appeared first on Hyperallergic.

from Hyperallergic http://ift.tt/2nMcLBI via IFTTT