#im speaking more specifically of the tv adaptation but like
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
can anyone who favors the wolf hall portrayal of AB > the tudors like...explain themselves?
#im speaking more specifically of the tv adaptation but like#im about to make a checklist and if the tudors isn't better it's certainly not worse#both depict her being manhandled by a male relative#AB 2021 and BSR are the first to avoid this but in the former it might count if you count henry as one which technically so (spouse)#AB 2021 also interestingly has a different portryal of her relationship with the duke of norfolk than traditional...?#there's resentment simmering underneath but for all that it's still on the face cordial#tobg's of that relationship (film) is also actually rather interesting. because it starts out very positive . almost sweet#and the book it's very like. gross in some ways but seems to begin with a grudging admiration on his part actually#he respects her intelligence and then this deteoriates#the best one i've ever read of that particular relationship is actually christopher rae's series. again#AB 2021 was supposed to be inspired by tobg but the relationship btwn AB and the duke of norfolk seemed more like it picked up where tudors#s1 left off....tbh...
3 notes
·
View notes
Note
hiiiiii im just sliding into your asks because i want to talk to someone about inkheart and mo specifically but no one in my real life wants to hear it lol. here's a question: if i were hypothetically thinking about writing an inkheart tv series what would be the most important parts of mo's character to really try and communicate/illustrate, to you?
omggg!! first off, my sincerest apologies for the late reply! second, I'm always dying to talk about Mo but I'm in the same position as you so thank you so much for the message, truly!!!
this is such a juicy question! if we're hypothetically assuming the whole trilogy would be adapted (and it better)... aside from the more obvious stuff like his relationships with Meggie/Resa/Dustfinger, I'd say that Mo's frankly scarily intense idealism should be hinted at early on, then highlighted. I've mentioned this before here, but it's really the driving force of his character if we're looking at his whole story, and his less reasonable later actions become easier to understand when you have this in mind.
more generally speaking, I basically think the roots of his Bluejay personality need to be consistently shown for his arc to make sense to viewers - his fearlessness and impulsiveness, his willingness to go really hard when he has to, the way he rarely actually fully opens up to anyone, etc. I'm still of the opinion that the seeds were all there; Mo didn't turn into what he does out of nowhere, he was never just a one-dimensional sweet meek dad.
(adding to this, I think it'd be important to properly depict that his acting out in Inkdeath is largely due to him being in a Very Not Good place mentally and not like, him being an asshole while he's having a good time)
I'm coming from a super biased perspective as someone obsessed with Mo's arc, it's unlike anything I've read before or since and I love it so much. I've always seen people not jive with it, so I think it'd be pretty tricky to pull off in an adaptation, too. Is the wider audience ready for a cozy book nerd hot dad to become an angsty pain in the ass murderer hot dad
#mo folchart#asks#live action mo would certainly be.... Something#by Something i mean i'd spend the next decade making dramatic gifsets of him#anonymous
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
someone asked for my live-blogging reaction to oouil tv, so i have put it under the cut with a more complete explanation of how i felt overall as well!
ep1:
okay so it’s definitely super different
sassy maeve, i love it
eggs instead of a car crash? i guess it’s bc they wrote out luis
addy finding jake on her own and cooper not helping 😭😭 why are we getting rid of all of cooper’s kind scenes
cooper and keely have a secret? and why does cooper seem so completely unaffected what
bronwyn and nate are so flirty right off the bat wow
bronwyn stole simon’s laptop?? what the fuck. this is so totally different
also no drinking scene with bron & nate :(
janae getting a Storyline and going after addy right away ?? why would she do that if she’s guilty her whole thing was wanting to stay away from them until addy basically forced herself into her life
totally weird side note: but not how i’ve been pronouncing nate’s last name this whole time
also just totally noticed that they skipped over everyone else also having fake phones?
OH and cooper is super new, moved here last year
COOPER’S SEALED RECORD IM SORRY WHAT THE FUCK WHAT THE FUCK WHAT THE FUCK WHY WHY WHY WOULD COOPER HAVE A RECORD
ahh here’s the florence + the machine thing everyone was talking about
bronwyn’s a terrible liar oh my god 😭
“sucks for your dad” line literally made me lol
LUCAS AND NONNY YES THANK YOU
wait shut the fUCK UP LUCAS KNOWS THAT COOPER IS GAY I LOVE THIS 😭😭
SHUT UP KEELY KNOWS I LOVE THIS
“i won’t waste this arm on that shit” get em cooper lol
addy and tj ooooFT
addy taking anti anxiety medication is definitely something she should’ve been doing in the books lol i also love the fixation on her hair
maeve continuing to be Sassy as fuck and i love it
is nate’s aussie accent super obvious to anyone else ?
THATS HOW YOU PRONOUNCE SIMON’S LAST NAME??
janae’s speech lowkey iconic even though they’re both the worst
HER SINGING LILY ALLEN. I WONT LIE, I DID LAUGH 😭😭 so fucking weird
also “it’s not okay to be gay” but it is okay to our people :) man janae c’mon you’re not seeing any of the irony here?
this tribute is so much worse than the books like how disrespectful jesus. i know simon was the Worst but yiiiiikes this was hard to watch
OH MY GOD OHMYGOD OH MY GOD THE POST
kris 🥺🥺
the missing laptop? ruh roh shaggy
ep 2:
oh addy being insecure 🥺
lol what the fuck jake is so manipulative i hate that i find them cute in this scene 😭😭😭
run cooper run
KRIS 🥺🥺🥺 A SPEAKING ROLE
i had to stop this scene bc i was stressed that they’re gonna ruin their relationship
pls let me see one scene of him comforting coop. one scene and i will be content
ooft bronwyn is just as brutal in this as she is in the books
LMAO kris and cooper swapping briefs iconic
are these eps gonna be like specifically character based? this definitely feels like an addy episode
lmao cooper “wouldn’t be the first time police out evidence where they needed it to be” go off king
addy loves to make herself look guilty “saw it on the food network” love u baby
BRONWYN AND NATE HOLDING HANDS THANK U MAAM
bronwyn immediately throwing addy under the bus wHY
cooper “WhAt?” sir 😭 are we surprised
also the capsule idea is excellent to really heighten the tension of in the room right here right now
oh no not cooper and his dad being so good :(
addy’s mom is so invasive i hate her
simon being the mayor’s kid ooft
bronwyn stop accusing addy challenge
“and i’ll be a mom…but a good one” BREAKING MY HEART ADS
noooooooo cooper embarrassed as hell 😪
NOOOOO KRIS NOT KNOWING THAT COOPER IS IN HIGH SCHOOL WHAT WHAT WHAT
im actually so sad about this, in the books cooper never lies to kris he’s literally the only person that he’s honest with, and that’s kinda?? a huge point??? of his character???
simon’s mom being so disrespectful to his literal only friend AHAHAHA wtf
keep on lowkey forgetting that this is an adaption bc it’s so different like 100 plot twists that didn’t exist before
addy hiding under that bed gave me so much anxiety it made me feel sick omg
“his love of his friends” babe what friends
maeve and janae ooft interesting
“best food” LMAO MAEVE i love u
addy and cooper sniping at each other no pls my chaos twins 🥺🥺🥺
keely and cooper are so sweet 😭😭
OH NO KEELY KNOWS HE’S GAY BUT DOESNT KNOW HES HOOKING UP WITH KRIS THIS IS BAD
addy and jake are getting my heart POUNDING RN POUNDING I AM STRESSED I AM S T R E S S E D
jake’s cast perfectly. i am terrified of this man: absolutely flawless casting
cooper’s so sarcastic i love him
“…in the kitchen” iconic lmao
OOOFT addy admitting it 😭 this made me emotional
COOPER AND ADDY THANK YOU FINALLY 🥺🥺🥺🥺
coop and kris part two let’s goooooo
oh my god are they gonna make it look like it was maeve 😭
honestly,,, maeve is a really good suspect i never actually considered that before lol
ep3
“i’m gonna fix it” no ur not baby
they’re doing a very very good job at keeping the suspense of one of them doing it up, by this point in the book everyone kinda knew it wasn’t one of the four but here it’s much more ambiguous
the soda anecdote is my favourite 😭😭
tj is so sweet but i’m praying they don’t make them end up together pls let addy have her independence arc
OH SHIT THEM BEATING THE FUCK OUT OF EACH OTHER
him hurting coop wtf sir
oh no not this happening in front of everyone oh no oh NO
but also jake was way calmer in the books
vanessa SUUUUUUUCKS
OH MY GOD NATES SECRET IS SO MUCH MORE INTENSE
maeve lmaoooo i love u
“don’t u think nate could have done it” WHY WOULD NATE EXPOSE HIS OWN SECRET THIS PLOT HOLE ANNOYS ME SO MUCH as soon as their secret is exposed it basically excludes them from being the killer
LMAO NATE AND ADDY I LOVE IT
“i could literally kill” “another thing you should keep to yourself” PLEASE 😭😭
COOPER STOP YELLING PLEASE i don’t GET why they’ve made these choices
thank YOU ADDY EXACTLY my point about the secret
maeve’s nosebleed oh my god oh my god
lmao oh NO bronwyn knows about the laptop
bronwyn really turned on her sister like 0.2 seconds flat
COOPER YES THANK U
maeve was friends with simon?!! what the fuck what the fuck what the fuck
oh no coopers secret fuck
also cooper hurting his shoulder NO
ugh i knew they would make kris buy from nate that’s so out of his character
seems weird that they wouldn’t have had this conversation earlier??? uhh tell me why they don’t know each other at all
maeve being a Good Sister
ooooh the phones make their first appearance
why is cooper so aggressive that’s so out of character did they forget he’s literally supposed to be sunshine boy
why would jake defend addy lol he’s supposed to egg on the drama
ahhh addy and janae bathroom scene iconicccc
“you suck like 20% less” lmao janae do not make me like you
WHY would maeve be friends with simon i do not get the direction we have taken here
WHY WOULD MAEVE BE IN LOVE WITH SIMON I DO NOT GET THE DIRECTION WE HAVE TAKEN HERE
????????????????????????? IM GENUINELY BAFFLED I AM LOST I AM CONFUSED
okay so?? addy & bronwyn are the only characters that are staying true to the books let’s be honest
oooft maeve call her out let’s go
oh my god cooper and nate friends?? it’s sweet.
wait coopers mom is dead in this
cooper and nate FRIENDS 🥺🥺🥺
KRIS KRIS KRIS KRIS
FUCK i am stressed for cooper rn oh my good god
kris wearing glasses oh cute
oh no poor baby is so hurt and stressed i’m 😭
DAMN STRAIGHT COOPER HE IS A SAD PATHETIC BULLY WHEN YOURE RIGHT YOURE RIGHT
GET EM BABY LETS GO POP OFF K I N G 91 MPH LETS GO
“i did it” oh shit
“i would fail and that just wasn’t an option” relatable tbh
her parents suck lol
cooper is so happy i’m stressed to my core he’s gonna get caught with pain killers i can’t be having it
OH NO OH NO KEELY AND KRIS IS THERE AND OH SHIT OH NO
NOT KRIS CRYING HOLD ON IM i gasped
“and your dad knows too” CAN U PLS GIVE HIM A FUCKING BREAK KRIS ITS LITERALLY A PLOT POINT IN THE BOOKS THAT KRIS NEVER PRESSURES HIM TO COME OUT I AM M A D
detective is gonna out cooper i will fight to the death this bitch
nate and bronwyn here we GO
OVERALL
look, it’s enjoyable. i think the actors are great, and theyre certainly really talented. i think addy and bronwyn are the best adapted, though even then they have some moments that make me think “wtf” like bronwyn stealing the laptop, and jake not being half as aggressive as he’s supposed to be
i like cooper’s storyline with his family & keely, although it’s obviously completely different from the books & takes away from how totally closeted he was there. i’m really torn, i like his character, but i like him as like, someone completely different from book!cooper, because i feel like apart from baseball, they barely have anything in common? cooper doesn’t lie to kris, he wouldn’t approach nate for drugs, he wouldn’t get aggressive with him either, and the closest he ever gets to accusing anyone is saying that peanut oil is a “weird kind of coincidence”. i knew it would be different but it’s very, very different. i guess i just have to get used to it? also kris is just not even close to being the same i mean he’s not a model, he’s not german, he doesn’t know about keely?? cooper says in the book that kris would “never force him to come out” or make him feel bad about it, but it’s like the first thing we see kris do. which is understandable in his situation, don’t get me wrong, but it’s just not at all what he’s like in the books
maeve’s storyline is,, a decision and i don’t understand why she would be friends with simon when her whole entire thing in the book is being grossed out by him
OKAY so concludingly, let me be clear, i do LIKE it. i think it’s fun and it’s interesting and the actors are great. obviously i’m being hypercritical in this bc i’m comparing it to the books. thats not to say there isn’t things i liked bc there definitely definitely is! but i’m also now looking at it as something completely separate from oouil bc apart from the primary plot points, there’s basically nothing in common
#oouil tv#oouil spoilers#one of us is lying#oouil#one of us is lying peacock#trying to tag anything people might have blacklisted if they don’t want spoilers
20 notes
·
View notes
Text
bunch of little things from the comics that i like to compare with the mcu to figure out what i would like to see going forward:
it's kind of a bare minimum petition in a way. i'd call this a comparative essay but it's too messy to be an essay so, let's just start LOL... im not actually that well versed in comics im more like "oh yeah i dig this" and run w what i like
first off sam in the mcu i actually really love what they've done with him. might be because i can't help but love sam since he's so damn charming. i guess one glaring difference between comics sam and movies sam is the way they carry themselves—compared to mcu sam, comics sam has been doing this for decades. he is rougher around the edges while having his big heart anyway, which is a really nice contrast and makes sense given how long he's been working as falcon lol. so what are the differences that can be found/how did the mcu adapt some of sam's comic traits?
he's a social worker and a community organizer! he also runs a veteran support group, not that different from sam being a counselor in the mcu. in tfatws it's shown that sam helps sarah whenever he's around in delacroix, in turn helping out the whole community—showing that they're (the wilsons) are very loved by all the members in their community, and this is a very important thing! a connection to a community! a purpose for a character to want to fight for others, to have something they love and protect and make it believable at the same time. it's lovely.
sam's heart being too big and moving people / seeing the best in others carries on super well in the mcu. everyone's familiar with sam giving shelter to stevenat in tws, sam never wanting to fight karli, sam being kind to john, etc. it's a lovely detail and one of my fave things about him so that's also super satisfying :)
so now in terms of sam wilson as a character what would i like to see more? it already started during tfatws when he confronted all those politicians on live tv but cap sam makes the point of not remaining quiet and speaking up, something that usually costs him public approval but he remains strong and tall about what he believes in. not being afraid to take a political stance despite people wanting him to stay neutral.
sam's struggles on wanting to do what's right by him and at the same time having some struggles according to how he's perceived by the public because it's always going to be an important conversation to have and again, this character is not one to shy again from stances like these. when tfatws was coming out lots of people were uncomfortable by how “political” and by the race conversations that took place in the series. i don't think they'd shy away from it anyway but still something i truly wish to see how they handle. esp with a not-white team working on it heh
more moments of sam being truly sure of who he is and killing it bc i love him
sam's connection to his family and how they influence him to be who he is, and sam's own little family composed of joaquín and shaun and redwing (currently just joaquín and redwing in the mcu) to have his own support system besides the guys we already know
just. sam :)
moving onto bucky, mcu bucky is... kind of starting to be his own character at last? like i remember watching tfatws ep 1 and going OMG HE HAS A PERSONALITY so it was a big deal. so it's a bit of a clean slate, right? so here are the things i wish the mcu would implement for bucky but i highly doubt they will but i love to dream anyway:
ideally seeing where the character is right now they could, yes, take an approach to winter soldier 2018 since it fits bucky's current character arc of learning to forgive himself and try to do good.
really want the mcu to stop pushing the white wolf narrative and trying to erase the winter soldier from bucky, seeing as how ed brubaker is responsible for bringing bucky back as the winter soldier and how he feels re:mcu bucky, i feel like the least they could do is let him still keep the winter soldier, just. reclaim the name like in the 2018 run, etc
bucky is a loving character. he just loves so damn much. if comics sam is sharp around the edges but soft inside, bucky is soft around the edges but firm inside. he's not afraid to call sam and nat his best friends when they're captured specifically to lure bucky out
he feels so much for people, he acknowledges the burden and the pain he carries to do better and take back his mistakes, and tries to take care of everybody without ever putting himself first, and endures So much.. talk about being a meow meow
super good with kids somehow?
please mcu give him friends who love him that's all i actually ask from you. bucky is loyal to a nauseating degree. even when sam and nat get captured it was literally illegal for him to break them out but what did he do? break the law, of course,
he's hilarious. for real trust me he's hilarious. like there's something wrong with him (affectionate)
so to sum it up: just dont be afraid to make him kind and loving bc thats where bucky shines most. as for the sambucky dynamic in general i just want them to still be themselves. just like this :)
#sam wilson#bucky barnes#sambucky#ish..#long post#god the person you put on earth to work and get their degree is deflecting work by writing about sambucky#sorry about all the sources im an english major i have to source or i die
39 notes
·
View notes
Link
(Google translated)
Dan Stevens, who grew up in Wales and south-east England, spent his summer holidays at the National Youth Theater at the age of 15, and he was drawn to the stage while studying English in Cambridge. Since his big breakthrough as Matthew Crawley in the hit series “Downton Abbey”, he has also repeatedly appeared in films such as “Inside Wikileaks - The Fifth Force”, “At Night in the Museum: The Secret Tomb” or “Beauty and the Beast” . Most recently, Stevens played the Russian Schnösel singer Lemtov in the Oscar-nominated comedy “Eurovision Song Contest: The Story of Fire Saga” from Netflix. At the beginning of June, the German film “Ich bin dein Mensch” by Maria Schrader celebrated at the Summer Berlinale Premiere, which starts on 1.7. comes to German cinemas regularly. Stevens plays the role of a love robot in it. Unlike on the screen, however, the 38-year-old prefers to speak English in the zoom-conducted interview. He chose a brick wall with a lion motif as the digital background. No allusion to the song “Lion of Love” from “Eurovision Song Contest”, but a photo of the famous Ishtar Gate in Berlin’s Pergamon Museum, where “I am your human” was filmed last summer.
Mr. Stevens, in your new film “I am your human” you play a humanoid robot that is entirely geared towards fulfilling the romantic needs of a skeptical scientist. You yourself recently described the film as “delightfully German”. How did you mean that?
I wanted to say that here pretty big questions - such as what actually makes a person or how much perfection love can take - are negotiated in a very light-footed, elegant and sometimes humorous way. In my experience that is a very German quality. At least I have often seen with many of my German colleagues and friends that they are very good at not discussing difficult issues exclusively deadly serious and melancholy.
Where does your personal connection to Germany and the German language come from?
My parents had friends who lived in Bielefeld and we used to visit them in North Rhine-Westphalia during the school holidays. Traveled from England by car! That’s how I learned a little German as a child, and later I learned it as a subject at school. I even did a short internship there through our friends in Bielefeld. I really love the language. Funnily enough, I was later able to use my knowledge of German professionally, because my first film was “Hilde”, in which I was next to Heike Makatsch played the British actor and director David Cameron, who was married to Hildegard Knef. After that, I always hoped that there might be another chance to speak German in front of the camera, because playing in a foreign language is an exciting challenge. When the chance arose to shoot “I am your person”, I could hardly believe my luck.
Did you know the director Maria Schrader who gave you this chance?
Funnily enough, when the script for the film landed on my table, I had just watched the Netflix series “Unorthodox”, which she directed. I had also watched a few episodes of “Deutschland 89”. In general, I knew that she was a great German actress, not least because friends who knew their way around the German theater scene often raved about her. Working with her was a joy now. Her understanding of actors is quite instinctive and brilliant. I have seldom seen someone who can help an actor who is having difficulties with a scene with such simple means.
The fact that you had already seen “Unorthodox” shows, of course, how quickly “I am your person” must have been implemented in the past year …
Oh yes, that was really quick. In March I was still in New York and was about to premiere a new play on Broadway. But then the pandemic came, everything was canceled and I flew back to my family in Los Angeles. A few weeks later, Maria and I met each other via Zoom - and shortly afterwards I was sitting outside in a café in the Berlin June sun for the first time in months to discuss the upcoming shoot with her. That was pretty surreal because I hadn’t actually left the house since March.
Is it correct that you oriented yourself to Cary Grant and Jimmy Stewart to portray the romantically programmed robot Tom?
In any case, these were role models that Maria and I spoke about. When you think of the game between the two of them, you always see an enormous clarity and directness. Cary Grant, for example, was always quite funny, especially in his romantic roles, but also flawless in an almost artificial way from today’s perspective. I found that very suitable for a robot. Apart from the fact that the ideas that Tom and his algorithm have of romance and love are certainly also shaped by the classic romantic comedies from Hollywood. Oh, the woman is sad, so I’ll bring her flowers! Such automatisms from the stories from back then were very appropriate for Tom now.
Keyword role models: Who shaped you in your career as an actor?
There were of course many. Jimmy Stewart was certainly something of a role model. My mom and I watched a lot of his films when I was little and I was always impressed by the kind of sweet tragedy that went into all of his roles. But maybe Robin Williams’ work influenced me even more. I always found the incredible variety of his films remarkable. He could make his audience laugh hysterically like no other, but also move them to tears in other roles. I always wanted to emulate this range.
In fact, the range of your roles is enormous and ranges from the Disney blockbuster “Beauty and the Beast” to a comic adaptation in series format such as “Legion” to bulky independent films such as “Her Smell” or the horror thriller “The Rental “, Which we just released on DVD. Is there a method behind this diversity?
Not in principle. I like variety, but I’m not just looking for roles that are as different as possible from one another. Rather, there are always similar factors that I use to select my projects. Sometimes there is a certain director that I really want to work with. Or the role itself is irresistible because it presents me with acting challenges. And sometimes a script is just fantastically written and I am interested in the topics it is about. With “I am your person” it was definitely the latter, especially since the timing was just right. In 2020 there were so many societal questions that ultimately touched the core of human existence. Such a script, which deals with something very similar in a light-footed way, was just fitting.
A few years ago you said in a questionnaire from the British Guardians that your greatest weakness was not being able to make up your mind. So every time you are offered a role, do you ponder whether you should accept?
No, no, when a script appeals to me, it actually does it very quickly. It’s such a gut feeling. If I’m unsure and skeptical, that’s a good indicator that this is not the right thing for me. That with the difficulty in making decisions related rather to something else. For example, it takes me forever to order in a restaurant because I can never decide what on the menu appeals to me the most.
You became famous with the role of Matthew Crawley in the series "Downton Abbey”. Did you immediately suspect at the time that something big was going on?
At first we were all pretty clueless. There are really many British history series, and we were one of them. When the first season aired in the US and was a huge success there, it was pretty unexpected. I never expected the impact the series would have on my career.
Barely ten years later, are you still being asked about the role?
Oh yes, regularly. Probably nothing will change about that either. I got out after three seasons!
In the meantime, however, the flamboyant Russian singer Alexander Lemtov from “Eurovision Song Contest: The Story of Fire Saga” should also be a character with whom you will be immediately associated, right?
Right, it has been mentioned more and more recently when people recognize me on the street. This charming, silly film obviously had a nerve with the audience last year in the middle of the corona pandemic. Especially since the real Eurovision Song Contest had been canceled.
The film was the number one topic of conversation on the Internet for a while - and Lemtov GIFs and memes were everywhere. Did you follow that?
It was really hard to avoid it. I wasn’t looking specifically for what people were posting. But of course my friends passed a lot on to me, and there were already some very funny Lemtov things. But he’s also a figure made for GIFs.
Another question every British actor under 40 has to put up with these days: Would you like to become the next James Bond?
Oh, of course, everyone gets to hear this question again and again who meets certain criteria. But it is completely hypothetical. Although a few years ago I read in an audio book by Ian Fleming’s “Casino Royale”.
You mentioned earlier that you and your family have lived in the United States for a long time. How big is your homesickness?
I actually feel very comfortable in Los Angeles. But every now and then I miss the sidewalk culture of European cities. People on foot, street cafes, things like that. Last year the longing for it was particularly great, although it was of course clear to me that there was a state of emergency in Europe too. In any case, I found myself reading books that were set in Europe and made me homesick. Which is why the unexpected trip to Berlin was really a boon.
You are also an avid cricketer. That’s certainly difficult in Los Angeles, isn’t it?
There are quite a few cricket clubs here. The only problem is that the few people who do the sport here are so good at it that I have problems keeping up. That’s why I always lose sight of the matter here a little. Even as a pure TV viewer, it is not easy to stay on the ball, because of course there is no cricket broadcast here at prime time. But as soon as I’m home in England in the summer, I really want to play again!
12 notes
·
View notes
Note
Do you like Regis' design in tw3 ? Have any actor headcanons who could play him in twn ?
omg no i hate him 😭😭 im so glad you asked though
here’s a quick rundown of the specific things i hate about regis’s design by cdpr:
the biggest issues to me are the following: ( and @ everyone reading... don’t try and excuse any of these with “but he was recovering from regeneration / healing / he was tired / stressed / upset” because cdpr could have just written a better plotline then):
he doesn’t smile very much in b&w. like... very much at all. and in the books, every time he is mentioned, he smiles with pursed lips, as is his custom. he kind of has this air of being amused by geralt in bof, smiling with pursed lips and then proceeds to be a true friend to him in tos and lotl, smiling with teeth on occassion. i consider this to be part of his character design because for characters like dandelion and regis, their smile is just an essential part of their visual description as a character.
the hairline..... i hate this count olaf pennywise motherfucker. cdpr tries to make their main characters look insanely different from every npc and that, to me, is not good character design. they should design for how the character is described and how the character feels, what visual elements do they think embodies the character.
regis should not stand out. the entire point of him is that he looks just like a regular normal human guy. for this reason, the claws and teeth annoy me (not to mention regis is described as having just regular fangs and not all pointed teeth, not to even breach the topic of his having all pointed teeth the same shape/length would be difficult for animals to live with, look at the skulls of mammalian apex predators and you will find variation in their teeth).
where is his apron. it’s almost akin to twn removing jaskier’s plum bonnet with an egret/heron feather. it not only symbolizes his profession as a surgeon, but also his domestic qualities and general approachableness. it makes him look kinder, imo. he may heal you or he may bake you bread... either works
where is his cloak. a nice black cape i think is ESSENTIAL for a powerful vampire to have.
he wears some fancy and expensive-looking items. doctors in medieval times were not treated like they are today, regis is not living on a $150,000K+ annual salary, and nor do i think he wants to... he is a humble and sincere man, he spends 1/3 of his year living in the wildnerness. he wouldn’t care so much about fancy clothes unless the occassion called for it, like in beauclair, and then he would wear a nice fancy black velvet jacket that makes him look like a vampire. i think just giving him a simple black coat would suffice, maybe a linen shirt instead of a highly embroidered and decorated one. one key element about regis is that even though he tends to lecture, he never intends to make others feel inferior to him, i feel his outfit in b&w represents someone who is formal and would use their status to demean others...
fingerless gloves. i like the fingerless gloves but they are incredibly impractical for a medic to wear... i think just no gloves would suffice (in bof, regis asks geralt to hurriedly pour a solution over his hands so he can perform surgery immediately, i feel that having to take off your gloves would waste valuable time.
regis should look kind, humble, run-of-the-mill skinny guy chilling in a cemetery at midnight, approachable, yet also a little ... off? it’s in the way he smiles maybe, hiding something...
also (god im so negative, anon i sincerely apologize because you came here just asking questions and im like NO >:( I HAVE HATE IN MY HEART, i want to reiterate that i really appreciate this question because i love talking about the subject of character designs, the books vs the games, and regis as well) but also, i do hate twn, and i hope they skip him entirely or bastardize him so hard that there will be no resemblance and that no one in the fandom will ever care about him, because his character in the books has so much nuance and twn could never.
i don’t really... have fancasts... because i don’t watch very many movies or tv shows... (also because i don’t think live action is the way to adapt the witcher!! we need a 2D animated series in a very beautiful unique style that becomes a cult classic!!!!) but as a joke one time i proposed jeff goldblum bc of the way he speaks and acts and also since he’s tall, skinny, and salt-n-pepper-y, and i had a good laugh, and then i started to consider and was like hm ok actually yeah sure why not. but i don’t really know him as an individual, and i think he did some shit, or was involved in a scandal, as all actors in hollywood do...
tbh im not horribly picky when it comes to casting because i feel like acting and writing is more important than casting. but they should you know also fit the description of the character. im still kinda bitter about jaskier and yennefer’s hair in twn, and twn also requiring cavill to beef up for the role of geralt even though geralt in the books literally starves nightly... ok lol... but yeah as long as the actor is some middle aged skinny (tall, thats my headcanon) guy with salt and pepper/greying hair, preferably a long haircut, no beard but maybe stubbly, and has dark eyes and kind of a pretty face, a little bit angular but not sharp features, and sincere kindness in the eyes, then i’m good i don’t really care much about casts... just act good please....
31 notes
·
View notes
Text
So, for some reason Im reading Graeber’s The Utopia of Rules and he’s talking about, like, how structural violence (well, more generally, power differentials) have a tendency to lead to situations where the subjugated are very much capable of imagining how the subjugators think (since they, yknow, have to), while the subjugators basically have no idea how the subjugated think (since they, yknow, have no need to (this also tends to result in situations where subjugators think of the subjugated as having some weird magical source of knowledge, see: magical n■■■oes, “women’s intuition”, mystical natives, magical omniscient gay best friends, the “out of the mouth of babes” trope, computers doing stuff “magically”...))
and his point is, eventually, how bureaucracies (in his view) exist to take these power-differential-induced imaginative lazinesses and just, spread them into an entire system; like, the bureaucracy is there ultimately because there is a... thing of systematic violence there and thus those with power aren’t really in a position where they would be capable of understanding how their subjects think and thus, bureaucracies are necessitated, since they operate very much in a context where you make essentially no assumptions about how the other people you’re interacting with actually think, I guess?
(and I guess if follows that my objection to his objection to bureaucracy is that, well, at sufficiently large scales, ignorance of how people think is kind of, inevitable. Like, you’re an anthropologist, David; you study this stuff. that means that it’s stuff that not everyone gets to know. Only using modes of organizing where everyone involved has enough information on everyone else involved to imagine how they think has some serious scalability issues that bureaucracy should theoretically be more capable of avoiding. clearly we need some kind of hybrid form or something...)
anyways this doesn’t matter; i wanted to... work out my thoughts on the following chunk that I found really interesting, where he talks about the history of the concept of “imagination”
One of the reasons it is difficult to see all this is because the word “imagination” can mean so many different things. In most modern definitions imagination is counterposed to reality; “imaginary” things are first and foremost things that aren’t really there. This can cause a great deal of confusion when we speak of imagination in the abstract, because it makes it seem like imagination has much more do with Spenser’s Faerie Queene than with a group of waitresses trying to figure out how to placate the couple at Table 7 before the boss shows up.
Still, this way of thinking about imagination is relatively new, and continues to coexist with much older ones. In the common Ancient and Medieval conception, for example, what we now call “the imagination” was not seen as opposed to reality per se, but as a kind of middle ground, a zone of passage connecting material reality and the rational soul. This was especially true for those who saw Reason as essentially an aspect of God, who felt that thought therefore partook in a divinity which in no way partook of—indeed, was absolutely alien to—material reality. (This became the dominant position in the Christian Middle Ages.) How, then, was it possible for the rational mind to receive sense impressions from nature?
The solution was to propose an intermediary substance, made out of the same material as the stars, the “pneuma,” a kind of circulatory system through which perceptions of the material world could pass, becoming emotionally charged in the process and mixing with all sorts of phantasms, before the rational mind could grasp their significance. Intentions and desires moved in the opposite direction, circulating through the imagination before they could be realized in the world. It’s only after Descartes, really, that the word “imaginary” came to mean, specifically, anything that is not real: imaginary creatures, imaginary places (Narnia, planets in faraway galaxies, the Kingdom of Prester John), imaginary friends. By this definition, a “political ontology of the imagination” could only be a contradiction in terms. The imagination cannot be the basis of reality. It is by definition that which we can think, but which has no reality.
I’ll refer to this latter as “the transcendent notion of the imagination” since it seems to take as its model novels or other works of fiction that create imaginary worlds that presumably remain the same no matter how many times one reads them. Imaginary creatures—elves or unicorns or TV cops—are not affected by the real world. They cannot be, since they don’t exist. In contrast, the kind of imagination I have been developing in this essay is much closer to the old, immanent, conception. Critically, it is in no sense static and free-floating, but entirely caught up in projects of action that aim to have real effects on the material world, and as such, always changing and adapting. This is equally true whether one is crafting a knife or a piece of jewelry, or trying to make sure one doesn’t hurt a friend’s feelings.
So,
Graeber here makes this weird shift in the first paragraph, where he starts out contrasting “imagination” and “reality” and then later just keeps jumping between that and contrasting “imagination” and “reason”, right?
Which is weird, because... well, imagination and reason aren’t really contradictory, at least to me. Maybe it’s just the... dealing with math all the time that makes it obvious, but, like, that’s what math is. Imagining weird concepts and then developing them in this purely rational manner. Think about, idk, any of the weird math concepts people love to use in fiction. higher-dimensional space? tesseracts? fractals I guess? I think those are pop...
The point is... I tend to think of reason as being twinned with intuition. Like, reason is there to take statementy structures and check “does this make sense?” while intuition is there to just come up with stuff out of nowhere, after being carefully trained on a large corpus of examples.
They operate together, yknow? Each needing the other to even really... make any kind of sense.
So, ok, if that’s what those are... what are imagination and reality?
I guess, in my head, the way it works is,
Imagination is this canvas in your head. You can draw on it freely, but its primary usage is that you dump everything that you know about reality onto it.
In other words I don’t make any... fundamental distinction between those bits of the imagination that represent real things and those that don’t.
Like, if I describe to you a 14-story tall concrete apartment tower completely surrounded by 2-story tall quaint buildings with tiled roofs and it’s an eyesore to everyone around it but from the inside the view is great, because there’s all these nice houses around it and it’s near a big lake and on the other side of that lake is a big mountain, if I tell you that description, does it change at all if I tell you that it’s the place I grew up in when I was in elementary school, before we got kicked out because our landlord got kicked out of their apartment? Does it move to a different location, where the real things are stored? No.
You don’t perceive reality directly, you dump it in your imagination, where you also dump stuff that’s only been described to you, and your best guesses as to how some things work, and the sound of my voice in your head as you’re reading this (if you’re still reading this) and the plot to whatever the last harry potter fanfic you read was and the crude erotic doodles of me you make when you’re bored and in that space, you reason about it. You check it for consistency, you... make hypotheses that could then be checked, and so on and so forth.
You make up stories (guesses) and sometimes they turn out to be true, and sometimes they were never intended to be true, they were just exercises.
In a sense, I understand the medieval perception of imagination as a sort of intermediate field between “reason” and “reality”; the problem is that it only works one way. Your perceptions get dumped in your imagination on the way in, but your actions, on your way out, are mediated more by, well, reflex, which is close enough to intuition to feel like sort of the same thing.
If we pretend briefly that “the soul” contains, yknow, reason, and thus necessarily in my system, also intuition, it probably also contains reflexes, and thus contains the exit back out to reality. We can imagine the soul in the middle of a fog (that is, the imagination, on which we act freely) which is itself between the soul and the entrance, where stuff comes from reality.
or something like that idk.
17 notes
·
View notes
Text
The thing about sherlock holmes’ inspired stories is that people always lean into him being an obnoxious asshole—not a new observation to point out that that doesn’t actually reflect his nature in the original stories—but while this type of adaptational decision is common in holmes’ stories, i think they are uniquely difficult to deal with in book adaptations.
In a TV show it is a lot easier to find that assholeishness some semblance of charming or likeable—unless there is a period of extended hiatus that lends itself to fans obsessively analyzing past episodes and realizing they don’t actually like the main character—but its easier to passively consume the assholeishness. The role of the actor means that the burden of interpretation of the script doesn’t entirely fall on the shoulders of the audience. It reads as charming, the watson-figure is either impressed, making it easier to ignore his rudeness, or is directly challenging to the rudeness, bringing attention to it and not passively being mistreated, allowing for the Holmes figure to show growth and caring.
In books however, the story—almost inevitably written in first person watson-perspective—means that we don’t need the characters to really engage to see the shape of their dynamic. The holmes-figure lectures and speaks over the watson, while the watson internally reacts and rarely gets a word in edgewise. This makes it harder to look past the presented-dynamic, as the main interaction is the holmes being an asshole, the watson thinking ‘what an asshole’ the holmes doing something impressive and, while the watson thinks ‘that is quite impressive’ the reader finds it harder to shift gears away from ‘what an asshole’ bc the reader is rarely given an example of the holmes being kind or caring.
In addition in tv shows, it is much easier to consume a first few episodes of unequal or negative dynamic between the characters, because they often develop a strong bond—or at least are aligned together—within the first few eps, which are easy to passively consume. In a book however, it takes a laborative consumption of the holmes character being an asshole to the watson, and reading about two characters not liking each other is not fun, especially if the experience is spent trying to figure out how such an obnoxious character becomes redeemed. It is much easier to give up on a book after several chapters of annoyance, rather than attempting to perservere to get to a point where you like the character and his dynamic with the watson.
This isn’t to say that book adaptations/reinterpretations of sherlock holmes are always bad, but to say that when they fall in line with that specific asshole genius idea of the character, they are much more annoying than when other types of media fall into the same or similar tropes. Also that i always am looking for good holmes inspired/adapted stories but im a picky reader so i end up disliking a lot of them.
#sherlock holmes#meta#orig post#long post#it is easier to think of good tv adapts#ie elementary or psych or house#bc the nuance is better#holmes in elementary isnt really an asshole and his watson is allowed to be assertive build boundaries and awarded equal partnership#in psych the characters are lifelong best friends and a team together and able to banter tit for tat#in house house is an asshole but wilson calls him on it extensively and they have an established relationship#a good book adaptation is actually an au of the original stories#in the enola holmes series#where sherlock’s main role is in how he orbits around his sister and his worry for her#but those books are v flawed not bc of the holmes dynamic but bc of the frequent use of the g slur#also i know of other holmes adaptationd that are probably better but i havent read yet#but this is more about shitty ya adaptations
1 note
·
View note
Note
44: “I still remember the way you taste.” (for marichat...I was going to ask for something tamer although you still could make this tame, but then my marichat trash loving soul saw this and im sorry)
Sorry it’s still kinda tame. This is the SFW blog after all.
50 Dialogue Prompts
She stared in disbelief at the silhouette outlined at herskylight. There was no denying the cat ears against the moonlight outside that toldher exactly who was hovering over her bed at ten at night, no matter how muchshe wanted to. She wasn’t ready for this yet, she still hadn’t gotten over theembarrassment she absolutely refused to admit to from last time he’d been here.
Sighing in resignation, she raised herself to a standing positionon her mattress, reaching up to unlatch the window so he could come inside, aninvitation he took immediately. Shivering, she closed the window again beforereturning to her bed and pulling the covers over herself to warm up.
“What is it Chat Noir?” she asked, hoping against all hopehe wouldn’t bring up the elephant in the room.
“I need to talk to you about what happened last time,” heblurted, no preamble of any kind but a fierce blush adorning his face beneathhis mask.
She groaned loudly. This is exactly what she’d been afraidof. She didn’t want their friendship to be weird now just because she’dproposed a stupid agreement she should have remained too flustered to everbring up with him.
Chat had been visiting her for a few months now, ever since theyhad both admitted they were heartbroken by their crushes just before Glaciator.As a result, they often spoke about their crushes – Chat openly and Marinette withonly a thread more secrecy. She often told him plenty that he could easily useto work out who she liked if he wanted to, but she deliberately left Adrien’sname out of the equation for fear he would think her love some kind of fanaticcelebrity attraction.
Talk of specific crushes had quickly morphed into previouscrushes, how crushes and relationships were portrayed on TV and -eventually-any experience, or lack thereof, the two had. She’d been quietly surprised tofind out that Chat’s first kiss had been when she had tried to break him freeof Dark Cupid’s control. It was a kiss she didn’t count herself due to thecircumstances, but Chat had seemed far more upset by something else.
“What if I wasn’t any good at kissing?” he had asked her, “Whatif she’s home right now, laughing at me?”
She had raised her eyebrows at him in amused disbelief. “Iseriously doubt that. Besides, weren’t you trying to kill her? I’m sure anykissing -good or bad- was not considered as your actual skill level.”
“I guess,” he had said, a slight whine to his voice, “I justwish I could remember so I knew for sure. Or that I had the guts to ask herabout it. I’m just worried that…nah it’s stupid.”
“No stupider than the rest of this conversation. Go on.”
“I’m worried that when I next get the opportunity to kisssomeone I like, whether it’s her or someone else-”
“Thinking realistically, I see,” she smirked.
“Ha-ha. I just don’t want to be bad at it. I wish there wasa way to practice without actually jeopardising anything with someone, youknow?”
She had been an idiot to suggest it really. It was a recipefor disaster, that was clear for anyone to see. But she could hardly tell himthe kiss hadn’t been all that bad and this way she could make him feel betterwithout risking her identity or his feelings.
It was meant to be one kiss. Just a single kiss she couldtell him was good and move on from, but he’d wanted real feedback and kissingwasn’t something she was familiar with either, so she’d been unsure what totell him. One kiss had turned into two as they tried to decide what worked foreach other and explain it and then three as they adapted, and four…
It had been well over two hours since their first awkwardpress of lips when they realised they had pushed forward into using tongue,bodies pressed against each other on her bed, hands buried in hair.
There had been an uncomfortable extraction of limbs and Chathad left far more embarrassed looking than she felt, a feat of its own.
“I thought we agreed it was stupid and that we never shouldhave done it,” she told him, her mind returning to the present moment and the super-poweredteenage boy kneeling in front of her.
“We said that. I dunno if we really agreed though,” he said,his eyes boring into hers before dropping to her lips hungrily. “I stillremember the way you taste, you know. It was so much better than anything Icould have ever imagined.”
She squeaked in response, his gaze intense enough that itwould be frightening on anyone else. But somehow, the fact that he was Chatcompletely negated the rest of it. The way he was in her room, on her bed, lateat night and admitting that he wanted to kiss her never made her fear for hersafety once.
He continued to speak from his place on her mattress, neverintruding further into her space as he watched her. “I’m glad you suggestedwhat you did. I might never have realised that I liked you otherwise-” -shegasped at his blatant admission- “-and…and it doesn’t matter how you feel. Ithink I just needed to realise it. Regardless of how things work out.”
They stared at one another in silence for a moment andMarinette watched his face slip from focused to passive and finally worried atthe continued silence.
“Although, I really would like to know how you feel anyway,”he said with a slight edge in his voice.
“I like someone else as well,” she told him.
“So do I,” he said, his eyes lighting up with hope at her chosenwords.
“What if Ladybug changes her mind and suddenly likes you?”she asked, suspicion evident in her expression.
“Then she’ll have to deal with the fact that I like someone else for a change.”
Her eyes moved around the room for a moment, unsure of herown heart before she finally sent a nervous smile in his direction. “Then getover here and kiss m-”
She had barely voiced her request when he obeyed grinningthe entire time.
Buy Me A Coffee?
58 notes
·
View notes
Text
why I’m not keen on Evak 2.0
fredweasleying replied to your post
“Skam Italia episode 7 reaction”
Im italian and i have the same opinions mostly....why dont you want an evak 2.0 tho im curious!!
Hi, I’m sorry for taking some time to respond! I was feeling a little sick this week and I have a long answer for this question, lol.
The main reason I don’t want an Evak 2.0 is because is that, well, I feel that Evak 1.0 is about as perfect a canon ship you can get in execution, and S3 has no major flaws for me - I only have one gripe of any substance (having to do with Emma outing Isak) and it doesn’t ruin the season for me or anything. Personally I didn’t want any of the seasons to be direct remakes and would vastly have preferred new stories tailored to the culture, with new characters developed around the actors’ personalities and strengths, but there’s not anything we can do about S1, and at least one S2 remake is mid-season, with more being set up. And I believe the contracts required the remakes to do S1 and S2 of the original? But S3 is not a guarantee. Anyway, S3 and Evak had some weird magic going for it where everything worked. Very rarely have I seen a fandom react with near-universal praise and satisfaction toward something, especially a canon ship. Obviously not everyone is going to love S3/Evak but I think it’s hard to deny that they’re overwhelmingly well-received. Not just by fans, either. I’ve seen professional film and TV critics gush about S3, too. Much of S3′s success comes from elements that can’t be replicated just by following the outline of the original.
The chemistry is hands down pivotal to the success of S3. I can guarantee you that, strength of the writing and directing aside, if those two actors aren’t fantastic together, then the season is just not going to work. Imagine two actors with no chemistry doing all the bed scenes, or the kitchen scenes, or the O Helga Natt scene. It would be so awkward. I think OG Skam overall did really well with cast chemistry, and Tarjei and Henrik’s chemistry was really something special - you can see little things in their body language, the way they mirror each other, turn toward each other, come up with unique gestures for each other that make them seem more real as a couple. They react to each other and feed off the other’s performance rather than just performing a script. I think it’s going to be extremely difficult to find actors who are even remotely as good with each other. (And frankly this is harder with gay fictional couples due to possible biases in their depiction ... I want to believe the best of the remake production teams but I’m not gonna lie, until I see it in action I’ll be a little apprehensive that they won’t let their Isak and Even be as affectionate together as the original. Even “progressive” shows can display double standards about that.)
You need a seriously gifted actor to play Isak. Not that you don’t need talent for all the characters, but there are quite a few scenes where Isak just looks at stuff on his computer, or gets a text message, or talks on the phone with someone, and you need an actor who can clearly communicate what Isak is feeling without help from other actors or stimuli. Then of course there are the bigger emotional moments, but Isak is a very internal, very vulnerable character for much of the season. As far as the remake Isaks go, Lucas hasn’t felt that believable to me in most scenes and his facial expressions/subtlety are especially what have left me cold, and I like Martino but his performance doesn’t feel that vulnerable to me yet. Matteo from Druck is the one who seems most capable of being Isak-like but IDK what’s up with Druck. I am very willing for these actors to show me excellent performances in the future, I’m just aware that they have a lot to live up to.
You need a seriously gifted actor to play Even. This could make or break the Evak pairing in the remakes, perhaps. I would argue that you need more acting chops to play Even than to play any of the other love interest characters in Skam, because you need someone who can pull off depression and mania convincingly. That’s really tough subject matter and someone who isn’t up to the challenge could potentially make the character a parody or caricature, the last thing you want to do in a season with positive mental illness rep. You also need someone who can walk the tightrope of carrying a big secret through most of the season while still being charming and sympathetic even as we’re stuck in Isak’s POV, being hurt and confused by Even’s unexplained behavior. We need to have some trust in Even. It will be hard to root for Evak if the Even seems like he’s just messing around with Isak and lacks that core sweetness and sincerity. Personally speaking, I never ever doubted that Even’s feelings for Isak were genuine, even when he was ghosting and giving mixed signals, because honestly, Henrik’s heart-eyes were just that convincing, lol.
Some of the symbolism and richness of the original’s writing and directing will be lost no matter what, if they stick to the S3 script.
For instance, 21:21 does not make sense as birth/rebirth symbolism if the character is not named Isak/Isaac/some variant. Of course the story can still continue and make sense on a surface level, but it will lose aspects that gave the writing additional depth. One reason of many that I love S3 is because the symbolism gives the story so much more weight. It makes Isak and Even’s relationship feel much more important than just a sweet teenage romance. Not to sound ultra corny, but presenting Isak’s love for Even as a form of spiritual rebirth feels downright profound and puts it up there with the “epic love stories” that Even likes, tragedy or not.
The Romeo + Juliet references are not going to make as much sense if they can’t, say, get the rights to the music from the original. Like … if you do a close remake with the pool kiss, and it might be a pretty scene, but you’re going to need some R+J music over it for it to have the same resonance. But then, lol, the scene will be too similar to the OG scene. The R+J references weren’t just fun Easter eggs for the viewers; they were woven into the story very thoroughly and thoughtfully. Even’s love of Baz Luhrmann tells us a lot of about personality and outlook on life. It gives us an idea of his romanticism but also hints at his depression. Thematically, R+J is hugely important in terms of creating tension and suspense throughout the season, that undercurrent of “epic love stories have to be tragic” and making the viewers expect the tragedy, only to subvert that expectation. A story about suicide becomes a story about rebirth.
They should not even bother trying to redo O Helga Natt, man. Just don’t do it. They’re going to lose a lot of the symbolism anyway.
There’s some other stuff but IDK, there’s just … so much that can go wrong. The Evak relationship feels really specific - they have so many inside jokes that are unique to them, so many recurring themes, so many little gestures, and they all work together as part of a whole. Copying them wholesale is going to feel artificial. Some of the remakes have handled the adaptation part better than others, but there’s some stuff that I just don’t think will work as 2.0 at all.
Since we’ll likely be getting an Isak season in each of the remakes - it was such an international draw that I can’t imagine it not happening for each remake that is renewed - what I really want is for them to write their own S3 featuring a coming out story, with the same care and detail as Evak, and covering similar themes, just ... not Evak. Not the same scenes, the same dialogue, the same characterization. Make Even have a totally different personality. I wrote a post about different films they could reference in S3 other than Romeo + Juliet, and like, I wrote it as a joke, but also? They should pick different movie references for S3 if they decide to incorporate them. Perhaps they could pick iconic Italian/French/German films from the country of that remake. Think carefully about the story and weave in different symbolism. Just recreating those motifs will be the ultimate sign of a remake’s laziness.
I do think S3 is very important in terms of the issues discussed, and I think it would be wonderful for youth in different countries to get the LGBT and mental illness representation. I would just prefer if they created something thoughtful and original rather than trying to recreate something that’s already considered a masterpiece by many critics and fans.
62 notes
·
View notes
Text
lemongogo mentioned you on a post “About bnha like same Show us suggestions you get”
@nearsightedgirl UH !! to be honest i havent watched a lot of shows in the past, so im still relatively new to figuring out what i like !! i dont have specific char archetypes but i guess i love action in shows. i LOVE fight scenes and mechas (vld!) but i also appreciate when a show can be relaxed and not as plot-driven 24/7
Aight I think I’d recommend...
Soul Eater (an anime that’s pretty good and has a very nice aesthetic that is kinda Halloween Town-esque)
it’s 51 episodes and has real good characters. The show ends different from the Manga because it caught up way too fast and they had to make due with how far the plot was at that point. Plus the music is ballin.
Sym-Bionic Titan is a show inspired in the vein of the original 80s Voltron made by Genndy Tartakovsky (creator of Samurai Jack) that ran for one season from 2010 to 2011 and was prematurely canceled but you might enjoy it nonetheless?
There is also the Thundercats 2011 reboot. After the success of Avatar: The Last Airbender Cartoon Network wanted to cash in on the whole “looks kinda anime” action series for kids vein only to realize it was way more expensive than something like the Powerpuff Girls or Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy.
Both the of the previous shows aired on Cartoon Network right around the time they wanted to make cheaper stuff the priority focusing on shows like Adventure Time that had simple character designs and less stuff with action as the main genre of the show. Not to mention it was hard to make toys for both shows, which was the main way to make money off a TV series until TV became more about advertising for third parties and spending money on things kids would actually want like tablet video games with in app purchases.
Speaking of CN canceling stuff earlier than they should have...
I don’t know if you watched Young Justice but while it is on the more serious end of the scale it was still pretty funny and had very good character development. The reason this got canceled was because the target demo was young boys but teen girls ended up watching it more so they didn’t know how to cash in on that (since marketing means you gotta stick to the target audience and if that fails to get traction your show is a failure the other demographics that are watching might as well not have any money switching marketing techniques to adapt to the people watching is still something networks find confusing today). It lasted 2 seasons and only after a long amount of fans demanding a season 3 did Warner Bros consider doing a season 3 but they want to make it exclusive to their DC comics TV series streaming service (this is so niche I doubt they will make enough money off of this though so that season could end up the last one period ) when it was originally going to be a Netflix thing.
1 note
·
View note
Text
Fic Author Interview
tagged by: the wonderfully talented and incredibly sweet @amirosebooks ❤
tagging: @iggyw @tenoko1 @casolantern @schmerzerling @amazinmango @serricoj @rainbofiction @coffeeandcas @topaz-eyes @angelofthemoor @culumacilinte @coplins
im going to do this from the slightly broader perspective of creative writing in general (since i write fic but i also write scripts and things for my job). also this is v long. sorry.
What inspires your work most? (The show it is based on, the actor who portrays a certain character, maybe the character itself…? It could even be an experience.) so generally my inspiration is (in order): (a) my own life experiences, (b) some kind of commentary i want to make about the source material or about fiction or fandom in general, and (c) the characters themselves and the aspects i love in them, especially trying to find ways to play with the duality of their personalities, the good aspects and the negative ones. i’ve known for a long time that what drives me to create is that i want to make other people feel less alone. you know those times to read something or there’s a line someone says, and you’re like, yes, yes, that’s me; no one’s ever gotten that before or at least never put it so perfectly into words, whatever that experience/feeling might be. i want to give people that moment with anything i create. there’s also a lot of things that i’ve experienced in my life that come up relatively often in fiction, or at least in fic, and a lot of it usually is off-putting to me. it never resonates. it’s melodramatic or simply inaccurate, and i think is often written by someone who doesn’t have the lived experience to pull from. so i always want to add my voice to the pile and benefit from my own experiences to make those kinds of tropes and situations more realistic and relatable -- to me, but hopefully also to others. like generally every character backstory or character arc i write in fic is something pulled from my own life. like it’s probably twisted or adapted somewhat, because i’m not into being autobiographical. but as an example, in faith healer, this bit: Memory degrades with time. Maybe as a child he knew that somehow. He knew that there would be a second, slower death across time, as she became more of idea than person, and so he clung onto specific moments as a talisman for Mom: I had a mom once; this was my mommy. He remembers her hands best. The way her skin was thin and dry, but her fingers strong, and the way they'd close around his hands. The way she would press in love and good luck and humility when he misbehaved with a squeeze to his chubby, too small hands. Second best he remembers her laugh, the way her mouth moved around a smile, the warmth in it, tinged with embarrassment whenever someone startled it out from her. The rest of the memories are vague, more like facts he can read out of a mental police blotter than lived experience. She used to wear some kind of fleece robe in the winter, thick and pilled, creating a soft cushion between her breasts for his head to rest when he sat in her lap for a story. He thinks the robe was red. She used to bake things from scratch and used to let him pretend to help. On Sundays she did laundry, down in the basement. He followed her once, asking when Dad would come back, and she paused on the landing, basket of clothes cocked on her hip, and wouldn't go any further until he went back upstairs. The basement, she said, was too dangerous for him, dark and damp. She wanted him to be safe. She always cut the crust off his sandwiches. that is my experience of my grandmother’s death. when she died i knew i would forget over time the specific details of her, so i picked a couple to remind myself of daily so i’d never forget them. and that was her hands and her laugh. and i do have that memory of her doing the laundry and standing on the landing to the basement asking her where my dad was and when he’d be back (he was on an 18 month voyage to africa - my dad is a sailor). and she did always cut the crusts off my sandwiches for me. (and btw i can’t ever re-read that passage with crying.)
What is your favorite fandom to write for? i mean, usually whatever my main fandom is at the time? which right now is spn. i did also enjoy writing potc fic and RDJ films sherlock holmes. i like writing characters who have a very strong but also very biased or unusual perspective on the world. they make for good unreliable narrators, which is something i love doing.
Which perspective do you prefer writing in? (First-person, third-person) always, always, always third-person limited is my go-to. i only write in first-person if the original source material is written that way (like ACD Sherlock Holmes) and i want to do a pastiche of that style.
Do you prefer writing reader fics or OCs? no. full stop. (okay, one caveat: i do like kidfic, but i am also SUPER PICKY about reading it bc im always looking for some accurate representations of parenthood and what it’s like to have a child. like kids are hard??? they’re hard and they make you worry and they drive you crazy and they have their own, weird, stubborn, fascinating views on life and the world. they’re not perfect angel children who exist only to be cute or ridiculously amazing mary sue geniuses. so yeah a well done kidfic where the kid is an OC i will read.)
Do you prefer writing longer works or one shots? given that every single WIP i have right now are fucking, horrible, lengthy novels,i want to say i prefer writing one-shots. i want TO BE ABLE to write one-shots. i used to do???? but yeah, i guess i really do enjoy plotting and world-building, which lends itself to creating monster plot bunnies instead of short stories or quick scenes.
Do you take requests? i do! do i ever actually get around to writing those requests is another question. but absolutely. send me prompts. ask for timestamps. if it speaks to me, and especially if it’s something i think i can write in less than 1000 words, i’ll most likely give it a go.
Do you enjoy getting random Asks? yes! always! i try to respond at least with in 72 hours. but yes please COME TALK TO ME ANYTIME.
What inspires the names for OCs (or extra character names) in your works? Do you pick them from real life or just select them at random? A mix? so with fic, i never really write OCs, or if i do, they’re p much a red shirt or like extra #243 or smth and therefore don’t have names. if a character has spoken dialogue or no on-screen dialogue but some impact on the plot, i’ll try to “cast” that part with a character from the source material. for example, in the family business (which i realise isn’t posted yet), there’s some issues with a rival gang that need resolving. i cast the head of the rival gang as a well-known character from spn that has generally served a rival or an enemy to the boys on the show. i like doing that bc i like the parallels it draws, especially when working with an AU, and the ability to explore characters and dynamics from a slightly (or not slightly at all but in fact completely divergent) angle. i follow the philosophy that part of the real cathartic nature of AUs and part of why we write them is the ability to offer commentary on the source material. that a good AU should offer commentary on the source material. they're both metatexts and paratexts simultaneously. the one caveat to this, again, is kidfic, because i like and i do write it (i’ve just never finished any of those fics enough to publish them). and then i try to name kids in the way i think their parents would name them. i try to put myself in the character’s headspace and try to figure out what name(s) would appeal to them. and if we talk about work, and the scripts i write, i mean all of that is basically OCs. so far every script i’ve written while employed by my current firm, i always stick in at least one instance of one of my dogs’ names. i also will make subtle film or tv references. like the script i just wrote, there were three characters, and the first character had already been named harold by our content lead. so i named the other two perry and harmony as a reference to kiss kiss bang bang. i’ve done all the clones from orphan black as OC names. i’ve done members of radiohead. if one of the scripts im writing already has a theme built into it for a specific pop culture reference (like yesterday one of the scripts i wrote was using yoda speech and star wars analogies as part of its marketing and engagement strategies) so i’ll name characters in line with that pop culture motif (so the star wars themed script has luke and ben and daisy and carrie as characters).
If your story(ies) have OCs, are their appearances based on real people or celebrities? If so, who? as mentioned above, i rarely include OCs and if i do, they’re unimportant stand-ins. so i never give much thought to how they look. offspring in kidfic i do think about how they look. if the actors who play the main characters have children, i’ll start there. like for dean and cas, i always look at jj and west and maison and try to figure out what a kid with some of those combined physical features might look like. i’ll also look at photos of the actors from when they were kids or teenagers and try to decide if these two people had a kid, what features would that kid inherit. for work, casting people depends on client expectations and design direction and budget, so it’s a different ballgame.
How long have you been writing fanfiction? i think the first fic i published was in 2002 or 2003. so 15 years i guess??? how has it been 15 years dude.
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
hiiii im lame and dont have a ‘real’ tumblr (i did at one point but maintaining it made me anxious) so please enjoy this poorly put together sideblog that is used for apps/pre-opening surveys.
Name/alias & Introduction.
hi hi hi! my name is alyssa, i’m a 21 year old studying theatre and english! i’m a redheaded feminist who cares too much about people, who loves disney, and who consumes too much coffee on a daily basis. i spend most of my time in class, working on costumes, or in rehearsal, but i somehow always wander back to tumblr, and, well, here we are! i have a possibility of meeting fiona shaw (aunt petunia) next semester and i’ve been screaming since i found out.
What’s your favorite book? Favorite movie? Favorite TV show? Favorite animal?
oh goodness. okay. here we go.
my favorite genre of book is historical fiction, specifically concerning the world wars, especially set in/concerning france. some of my favorites - the nightingale, all the light we cannot see, and the storyteller! outside of that genre, i love everything jennifer donnelly’s written (the rose triology was fantastic), the harry potter books (...clearly.), and gone with the wind!
my favorite movie without a doubt is gone with the wind. close second is the 2015 live action cinderella, meet me in st louis, and anastasia! i also loved age of adaline, and the intern, for more recent releases!
favorite tv shows are game of thrones, the office, and trashy reality tv competitions. im basic, we’re moving on.
my favorite animal is an elephant! they have been since i was little. i cant really explain why, i just love them?
If you could visit any place in the world, where would it be and why?
i’m working on a show right now that takes place in russia, and my character’s biggest dream in life is to go to moscow, so right now, i’d really like to see that! (it’s chekhov’s three sisters, for any curious minds). i’d also really love to see london! and pembroke castle in wales, for another nerdy reason - i played the earl of pembroke in a shakespeare adaptation last year and the castle is still standing and apparently does historical reenactments! i need to see them!
What do you take everywhere with you?
to continue an honest trend - my phone. a pony tail holder and bobby pin, and typically a script! i have a ring that i’ve had since i was 16 that i wear every day as well, in addition to 3 others i’ve collected over time.
What are your favorite FC’s to play?
i adore lily james and sophie turner! i typically only play females, so i can’t really speak to male fc’s. i used jessica brown findlay once and she was lovely, and i have an ever growing list of hopeful future faces!
What’s your Hogwarts house? Your Illvermony house?
i was a hufflepuff/ravenclaw hatstall and chose ravenclaw, and am a pukwudgie! i once saw it described that your hogwarts house reflects your greatest strengths, and you illvermony house reflects how you use those strengths, and i thought that was pretty beautiful.
What’s your Patronus?
im pretty sure it was some type of bird, and a horse at one point? i honestly don’t remember.
Favorite Harry Potter books/movies quote?
‘...a way of seeing the beauty in others, even, and perhaps most especially, when that person couldn't see it in themselves‘
i think this quote is so important to remember and think about. it shows us that in the end, above talent and skill, how we treat those around us is the legacy we leave behind. i think that’s kind of beautiful, and something everyone in the world could stand to hear today.
Who are your favorite characters from the books/movies?
i was definitely the 13 year old who thought she was hermione growing up. i also adore luna, and lily, obviously! i love the freedom of getting to think of the next generation, especially victoire, and always had an appreciation for mcgonagall and lupin.
Which skeletons were you interested in?
if you haven’t already caught it, i adore lily! but some of the slytherin women have caught my eye too, which is interesting and kind of scary, because i typically steer clear of the not-so-nice characters.
What drew you to our little group in particular?
i think it can be hard to come up with fresh, new ideas for the marauders that doesn’t completely take away from the story. there’s a very fine line between working and not working, and this group seems to be falling perfectly in place! the ideas seem lovely, and i can’t wait to see what happens with it!
What are you looking forward to in this roleplay?
everything? i’m excited to see what the admins have up their sleeves, and what this new set of circumstances means for the characters we all already know, how it will affect their development, and where it will take them in their journeys!
And finally… Coffee or Tea? Cats or Dogs? Books or Movies? Hot or Cold? Flowers or Plants? Outdoors or Indoors? Ice cream or Froyo? Beach or Mountains?
oh god. i am horrendously bad at making decisions of any kind, so don’t hate me for this
both (coffee in the morning, tea at night). both (i fully plan on adopting one of each). books for the feelings evokes, movies for entertainment. hot showers, cold weather. flowers (ironically, my favorite flower is a lily - i get them from my parents every time i open a show). indoors, especially in allergy season. both ice cream and froyo have their time and place in my heart. beach to spend time at, mountains to look at.
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Technology and Social Media as Modes of Conversation for Underrepresented Communities: An In-depth Look at the Importance of YouTube within the LGBTQ+ Community
By Kathleen Grillo -
“On September 23, 2018, ironically Bisexual Visibility Day, I sat with my suitemate on her bed while another suitemate of ours stood against the closed door. Then, I told them I was, and to clarify still am, bisexual. The rest of the night I came out to four other suitemates.”
On September 23, 2018, ironically Bisexual Visibility Day, I sat with my suitemate on her bed while another suitemate of ours stood against the closed door. Then, I told them I was, and to clarify still am, bisexual. The rest of the night I came out to four other suitemates. The previous night at midnight, I had come out to my best friend over text, too afraid to tell her over facetime. Over the course of the next few weeks, I would go on to tell those closest to me. Today, I am still telling people. People think you come out once. I thought you came out once. You tell one person and then expect the rest of the world to just know, but I, and many others, are wrong. I will continue to tell people I am bisexual for years. Maybe the rest of my life. There will always be someone else to tell. Coming out is different for everyone. For some, they really do come out once. For others such as myself, they know they will come out many times throughout their life.
I first thought I was bi when I was twelve years old, but quickly dispelled the thought when my mom told me it was normal to think girls were pretty. Little did she know I’d imagined kissing them. The thought was gone though, and I continued with life. That is, until November of junior year when my best friend came out to me. She’d known her whole life, and she had been wanting to tell me since freshman year when we met. That day on the bus ride home, and on the bus ride home for the next week, I questioned myself again. No, I thought, I am not gay. Time passed. I was straight, but I was supportive. I always had been.
Then, I went to college, a place of discovery, where you meet new people and try new things. Maybe, like me, you live in a new city. As cliche as it is to say, college really does teach you things about yourself. For me, that meant re-evaluating my sexuality. Once again, I returned to that questioning. This time, though, I got a different answer. No longer did straight feel right, but bisexual was starting to. Looking back, there were clues scattered throughout my adolescence, ones I didn’t see until questioning. In those weeks of inner reflection, when I was too afraid to talk to anyone I knew, I turned to YouTube. I listened to queer music and watched the respective music videos. I watched coming out videos, listened to people’s stories. How did they know? When did they come out? How did they come out? Am I apart of this community?
...
Dr. Sherry Turkle, a Harvard graduate, is known for her work as a psychologist and sociologist. Moreso, she is known for her discussion on the topic of social media and technology. In 1996, she wrote a book about the up and coming technology which led her to be displayed proudly on the front of Wired magazine. More recently, Turkle spoke for TED.com, a popular website containing speeches on ranging topics and featuring a wide selection of speakers. Turkle was there to speak about technology once again. This time, she was further discussing her research on the modern generation and their addiction to technology, to social media. Texts. Tweets. Notifications. She claims, “I think we're setting ourselves up for trouble -- trouble certainly in how we relate to each other, but also trouble in how we relate to ourselves and our capacity for self-reflection.” She explains that social media is changing how we think, that technology is literally changing our psyche. And Turkle is not wrong; we are ever adapting to the world around us. We learn to split our attention span, to send that text while still listening to our friends. We learn to finish an assignment while also writing notes from a professor’s lecture. Turkle is valid in her argument that, “People want to be with each other, but also elsewhere -- connected to all the different places they want to be.” We do split ourselves across many forms of communication, but Turkle’s argument falters in its ignorance of all sides of social media and technology.
Most people I know would say social media doesn’t inhibit their ability to connect with those around them. In many ways, technology and social media builds connections and enables conversation. Friends text or facetime when they are away at college. Parents call to check in. Classmates work on projects. It is a different type of conversation, but a conversation nonetheless. Even more, Turkle’s argument comes from a place of privilege. In her essay “Always-On/Always-on-You: the Tethered Self”, she says, “Tethered selves come together, but do not speak to each other”, meaning that, because we are connected, or tethered, to our devices, we cannot converse properly with those around us. This assumes that all conversations we want to be apart of are being hosted in real life. But what if that isn’t the case? What if those you identify with aren’t in your real life sphere?
One such community in which this occurs is the LGBTQ+ community. Many individuals who belong to this community, who in this essay will be referred to as queer individuals, turn to the safety and availability of social media. A large platform where this occurs is YouTube, as explicitly explored here. There are many YouTubers, those who create and post videos to YouTube, that are known for their queer content across all ranges, from coming out advice to queer music to queer education. All such YouTubers are real and non-scripted as they are in TV or movies. Because of this need for belonging within the LGBTQ+ community it is clear that “The quick spread of the videos is testament to how many people search for coming out advice, unable to access it through their immediate environment or most media outlets” (Bateman). This quote comes from Jessica Bateman, a writer for Broadly, a subsection of Vice that focuses on unrepresented individuals. In the article, Bateman focuses specifically on the importance of coming out videos, one of the most popular kinds of queer videos on YouTube. Not only do these videos answer questions that many queer individuals are too afraid or unable to ask, but they also provide validation in the form of the video’s creator and in the continued conversation found in the comments section of such videos.
One such Youtuber, whose coming out video has reached over 8.3 million since it was posted on August 7, 2013, is Troye Sivan. His video is one of the most well known in the LGBTQ+ community. Sivan is one of the original “gay YouTubers,” who was openly gay and made videos discussing such topics. In this video, Troye begins by saying, “This is the most nervous I’ve probably ever been in my entire life, but I’m going to deal with it because I have something to tell you guys.” Even Sivan, who had a strong level of support on his channel, was nervous. This point can be extremely validating to individuals who haven’t come out or are trying, and struggling, to do so. This is one example of many as to how these videos can be paramount in the LGBTQ+ community. They provide support and as Bateman says, “Coming out to your parents is never easy, but more and more LGBTQ young people are sharing their experiences on YouTube to ‘show our identities are valid.’" Since his coming out video, Sivan has proved to be influential, continuing his YouTube channel years after the video’s debut. Recently, Sivan is more known for becoming a queer icon as a musical artist.
As mentioned, an important component of these videos is the comments sections. On Sivan’s video, there is a mix of old comments posted when the video was first released and he was little more than a YouTuber, and new comments, posted now with the knowledge of Sivan as an artist and role model. These comments show the personal influence and conversation created outside of the YouTuber that many queer individuals will spend hours scrolling through to find the many other people they identify with. Such comments include, “I am a 60 year old gay man. This was the video I watched the first time I saw you about a year ago. I think you are great. I can't wait to see the movie "Boy Erased". I think your music is beautiful. I have listened to a lot of it. I think you are an inspiration to a lot of people. You may not realize it, but people like you even help older people like me” (Randy D). These videos do not just appeal to a younger generation, but also to anyone who wishes to find validation or education.
They also become a place for people to share their own stories. Most importantly for some, they are safe, anonymous places to do such. This is a crucial component of the online conversation being composed, especially considering the high amounts of mental health problems and suicide among LGBTQ+ individuals. According to the Trevor Project, a national organization that aims to help LGBTQ+ youth through crisis and suicide scenarios, “LGB youth are almost five times as likely to have attempted suicide compared to heterosexual youth” and “...40% of transgender adults reported having made a suicide attempt.” Another comment by user Kristine Jauregui, says,“Im bisexual...but until now im inside the closet waiting for someone to open it. Im scared to come out because I knew already that they're not going to accept me. And lately my mom told me that i need to find my prince but in my mind my prince is a princess.” (Jauregui). The responding comments are full of love and encouragement. The anonymity of social media, although isolating at times, can open people up to talk about things they can’t in real life, or when similar identifying individuals aren’t available in their real life.
Outside of the initial need for coming out and finding validation, is the want for education. Whether a part of the LGBTQ+ community or not, YouTube has become a place for education. Specific queers can find tutorials on packing and binding, practices taken up by many trans individuals, as well as learn the difference between some sexualities and genders and learn more about queer sexual health. One person who has done such is Ash Hardell, a non-binary, trans-masculine, bisexual YouTuber. Not only do they make regular YouTube videos, but they are also the writer of a book called The ABC's of LGBT+. Although, to clarify, the book is published under the name Ashley Mardell, the name they used before getting married and before changing their first name to a more nonbinary one. Hardell explains that the purpose of the book is “to be a detailed guide of many LGBTQIA+ identities and terms with an emphasis on those that are mis- and underrepresented.” The book uses multiple sources, from images to video links to interviews, to explain and educate the many different areas of this community. Hardell perfectly explains why their book is important by saying, “in an attempt to combat erasure and increase general LGBTQIA+ knowledge, this book hopes to offer visibility and a voice to identities that are usually lost and forgotten.”
It is important to Hardell, both in their videos and their book, that proper education is offered to all within this community. Their YouTube channel heavily reflects the ideas presented in the book. They have countless videos targeted for gender education, trans education, and sexuality understanding. There are also many videos that display collaborations with other YouTubers that produce LGBTQ+ content. This opens the conversation to more than just one voice. With something as unique as sexuality and gender, it is extremely helpful for this community to know all of its resources, or at least as many as it can. Outside of queer identifying individuals, these channels that provide education are extremely important for cishets, a term used to mean a cisgendered, heterosexual individual. There are many topics and ideas that become difficult for one to understand unless they themselves have experienced it. YouTubers such as Hardell begin to help “outsiders” understand. Without YouTube and social media, it becomes increasingly more difficult for education to spread. The LGBTQ+ community is just one of many that use these sites to spread their message and gain understanding in such a diverse world.
We all know that it is easier to share or like a tweet or Facebook post, to watch a five minute YouTube video than to read a book or find someone willing to discuss such private matters. When these things are absent, people turn to social media and technology. Yes, as Turkle claims, “Connection is more like a symptom than a cure. It expresses, but it doesn't solve, an underlying problem.” That problem being the fear of loneliness. She argues that we connect when we are alone, but Turkle assumes that the same conversations are being hosted in person as well as online. While this is arguably valid, there are times in which we need to be alone without connecting, there are also times when we need to connect so that we can be alone without feeling lonely. In the LGBTQ+ community, it is very easy to feel lonely, especially if a queer individual has no similar identifying individuals near them. In that absence, social media and YouTube has become a place of validity, representation, and education. People receive answers to questions they are too afraid to ask, see themselves in the stories of others, and find courage in the bravery of role models. Coming out, something that is ongoing for many LGBTQ+ individuals, can be extremely isolating, but YouTubers and the very real people commenting on these videos are a safe haven for many queer youths, and adults. Yes, the kid on their phone while at dinner may be scrolling through Instagram or texting their friends who they’ll see tomorrow anyway, but they might also be scrolling through the comments of their favorite music video by Hayley Kiyoko as they debate telling their parents about their sexuality or their gender or both right then and there. Despite Turkle making a very reasonable claim, she ignores the communities where real-life exchange is not available. And in those circumstances, simple online connection can mean more than any person to person conversation.
Acknowledgements
I’d like to thank Mary Kovaleski for really pushing us to reach for a conversation we wanted be a part of, no matter how difficult it seemed. I would also like to thank my peers Matthew Pifko who provided useful research and Audrey Iocca who gave me extensive critique. I’d like to thank all the YouTubers who have given the LGBTQ+ community a place to express themselves and have dedicated themselves to improving the community. This work also wouldn’t be here if it weren’t for my family and friends who’ve given me love and encouragement. Lastly, I’d like to thank myself for having the bravery to share a story I’ve never told.
Works Cited
Bateman, Jessica. “How YouTube Videos Changed the Way Young People Come Out.” Broadly,
VICE, 3 Apr. 2017, broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/8x4gkp/how-youtube-videos-changed-the-way-young-people-come-out
“Facts About Suicide – The Trevor Project.” The Trevor Project,
www.thetrevorproject.org/resources/preventing-suicide/facts-about-suicide/.
HeyThere005. “Ash Hardell.” YouTube, YouTube, www.youtube.com/user/HeyThere005.
Jauregui, Kristine. “Coming Out.” Comments section, YouTube, Apr. 2019, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvzWNwJ41_k .
Mardell, Ashley. The ABC's of LGBT+. Mango Media Inc., 2016.
Person. “Power. Life. Culture. Lore.” Broadly, VICE, broadly.vice.com/en_us.
D, Randy. “Coming Out.” Comments Section, YouTube, 7 Aug. 2013,
www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoL-MnXvK80.
“Saving Young LGBTQ Lives.” The Trevor Project, www.thetrevorproject.org/.
Sherry Turkle, ‘Always-on/Always-on-you:The Tethered Self.” In Handbook of Communication
Studies, James E. Katz (ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2018.
Sivan, Troye. “Coming Out.” YouTube, YouTube, 7 Aug. 2013,
www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoL-MnXvK80.
Turkle, Sherry. “Transcript of ‘Connected, but Alone?".” TED,
www.ted.com/talks/sherry_turkle_alone_together/transcript?language=en#t-294147
.
0 notes
Note
all of them
ALEX THERE ARE TWO HUNDRED OF THESE PLS
200: My crush’s name is: Nupur199: I was born in: is this asking for time or place198: I am really: too tired to be dealing with this rn197: My cellphone company is: verizon I think196: My eye color is: brown. like 20% hazel-ish if you squint195: My shoe size is: 9 1/2194: My ring size is: uh193: My height is: 5′5″192: I am allergic to: capital pi191: My 1st car was: lol190: My 1st job was: working as a Hebrew teacher? That is. Still my job.189: Last book you read: Invisible Man for school, Adaptation by Melinda Lo outside of it, and I’m currently working on a book written about Tolkien.188: My bed is: A CASTLE IT’S THE BEST BED OKAY187: My pet: Sasha and Maya, the bestest cats186: My best friend: “””””””””””””””””you”””””””””””””””””” that’s a lie it really is you
185: My favorite shampoo is: I use Pantene but like. I don’t really think of shampoo in terms of favorites?184: Xbox or ps3: what are those183: Piggy banks are: c u t e182: In my pockets: money, quarters, this one teabag that I keep forgetting to do anything with, and occasionally small wrappers.181: On my calendar: your birthday!180: Marriage is: classy179: Spongebob can: sponge the bobs but can he rob the mobs?178: My mom: a great and good and amazing mom177: The last three songs I bought were? Three individual movements of Johan de Meij’s Lord of the Rings symphony176: Last YouTube video watched:175: How many cousins do you have? 4174: Do you have any siblings? 1173: Are your parents divorced? nope172: Are you taller than your mom? yup171: Do you play an instrument? DO I EVER170: What did you do yesterday? sure as heck not any calculus homework[ I Believe In ]169: Love at first sight: I thought I did, until yesterday 3168: Luck: Yeah?167: Fate: I mean idk166: Yourself: “””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””sure””””””””””””””””””””””165: Aliens: I believe in the possibility, I’ve never pretended to know!164: Heaven: I wish I did more than I do163: Hell: nah162: God: *waves my hands in a squiggly agnostic way* not in like a biblical sense but in a unifying connect-y energy in everything idk161: Horoscopes: I mean I believe in them as concepts like. They exist. That’s a thing. I don’t buy into them but I like them all the same.160: Soul mates: 159: Ghosts: nnnnnah158: Gay Marriage: HELL YEAH157: War: not in so many words156: Orbs: what155: Magic: the elf sitting in my computer says yes[ This or That ]154: Hugs or Kisses: hugs153: Drunk or High: drugs are bad152: Phone or Online: Are these mutually exclusive? Online151: Red heads or Black haired: BOTH I mean red heads bc maedhros but I find both very attractive150: Blondes or Brunettes: brunettes all the way149: Hot or cold: how cot or how cold?148: Summer or winter: mmmeh147: Autumn or Spring: autumn!146: Chocolate or vanilla: vanilla!145: Night or Day: night as a concept, day as a time when I’m awake144: Oranges or Apples: apples. unless we’re talking clementines or mandarins here in which case...143: Curly or Straight hair: shrug?142: McDonalds or Burger King: I only eat organic kale cubes141: White Chocolate or Milk Chocolate: dark chocolate what sort of a rigged survey is this (but okay I like all chocolates they are all good and great)
140: Mac or PC: ...............mac139: Flip flops or high heals: neither gross sneakers are good138: Ugly and rich OR sweet and poor: I love how it’s not even pretty and poor but “sweet”, like what kind of asshole would say ugly and rich and have that be an official statement that they make.137: Coke or Pepsi: I don’t like fizzy drinks136: Hillary or Obama: I’m going to cry135: Burried or cremated: planted into a tree134: Singing or Dancing: BOTH133: Coach or Chanel: what does this mean132: Kat McPhee or Taylor Hicks: who are these people131: Small town or Big city: Once upon a time I would’ve said small town, but these past two years I’ve really come into my own as a citygirl.130: Wal-Mart or Target: target ofc129: Ben Stiller or Adam Sandler: uh128: Manicure or Pedicure: I don’t have nails127: East Coast or West Coast: I mean I feel like I kind of have to say east126: Your Birthday or Christmas: my birthday lol christmas is. not a thing. that I celebrate.125: Chocolate or Flowers: I’ve always thought flowers were the cutest, but I’ve also always wanted chocolate the most124: Disney or Six Flags: Disney I guess? I’ve been to neither123: Yankees or Red Sox: what are sports[ Here’s What I Think About ]122: War: really really fucked up and unfortunate121: George Bush: which george bush120: Gay Marriage: I don’t have specific thoughts on this it’s just a thing that should be a thing that I want to be a thing119: The presidential election: let’s not118: Abortion: I think I would have a hard time getting one personally, but I would never presume to speak for everyone.117: MySpace: sure is a website116: Reality TV: oh you mean the sitcomarillion?115: Parents: parents in general? Or my parents? My parents are the best most understanding loving parents and I’m really lucky to have them114: Back stabbers: “””””pals””””””113: Ebay: a party112: Facebook: I sure don’t use that consistently. I only really made my account to check in with my mom’s account.111: Work: should be FUN AND LIFE ENRICHING WOA110: My Neighbors: a okay109: Gas Prices: priced108: Designer Clothes: designed107: College: HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH LETS NOT106: Sports: ew105: My family: I LOVE MY FAMILY104: The future: L E T S N O T[ Last time I ]103: Hugged someone: I just hugged Benjamin goodnight a moment ago102: Last time you ate: I had eggs for dinner101: Saw someone I haven’t seen in awhile:100: Cried in front of someone: the real question is when is the last time I DIDNT cry in front of someone?99: Went to a movie theater: To see Hidden Figures the day after it came out!!98: Took a vacation: for a given value of “taken”...97: Swam in a pool: I honestly can’t remember96: Changed a diaper: Have I ever changed a diaper?95: Got my nails done: That one and only time at Lena’s birthday party where Elizabeth made me even though I didn’t want to.94: Went to a wedding: I can’t remember right now I’m too tired93: Broke a bone: 7th grade. Clarissa was there.92: Got a peircing: I got my ears pierced in fifth grade?91: Broke the law: I stole a firetruck to go to starbux90: Texted: 500 years ago in Vampire Scotland[ MISC ]89: Who makes you laugh the most: u88: Something I will really miss when I leave home is: I can’t think about this or I will cry87: The last movie I saw: Hidden Figures86: The thing that I’m looking forward to the most: going to Starbucks85: The thing im not looking forward to: calculus examinations84: People call me: Buttermay83: The most difficult thing to do is: answer all these questions in one go82: I have gotten a speeding ticket: what’s driving81: My zodiac sign is: capricorn!80: The first person i talked to today was: My cat?79: First time you had a crush: You already know this leave me alone78: The one person who i can’t hide things from: sometimes you and sometimes Benjamin but mostly JRR Tolkien77: Last time someone said something you were thinking: that time you said “I want an oreo” in class today76: Right now I am talking to: my own exhaustion75: What are you going to do when you grow up: gay marry74: I have/will get a job: what is this even asking73: Tomorrow: Thursday72: Today: Wednesday71: Next Summer: pre-college screaming70: Next Weekend: pre your birthday excitement!69: I have these pets: Sasha and Maya, the bestest cats68: The worst sound in the world: Dr. Propst67: The person that makes me cry the most is: Uzuki Kakinuma66: People that make you happy: lots of people, you know the people65: Last time I cried: :}64: My friends are: the actual absolute best friends in the world63: My computer is: trying its best62: My School: has a fire microwave GK GK WE ALL WE GOT61: My Car: what’s a car60: I lose all respect for people who: are in robotics59: The movie I cried at was: the singular movie???? who does this survey think I am?58: Your hair color is: dark brown!57: TV shows you watch: the Uzuki Files56: Favorite web site: mspadventures obviously55: Your dream vacation: to middle earth yes hello54: The worst pain I was ever in was: when I last gave birth to my uterus and almost died53: How do you like your steak cooked: medium rare?52: My room is: smallish, messish, comfy51: My favorite celebrity is: Yuna Kim50: Where would you like to be: in bed49: Do you want children: we’ve discussed this. I go back and forth48: Ever been in love: ye47: Who’s your best friend: this was literally already asked46: More guy friends or girl friends: what are guys45: One thing that makes you feel great is: not having to answer 200 questions in a row44: One person that you wish you could see right now: Uzuuuuuuuki43: Do you have a 5 year plan: nnnnnup42: Have you made a list of things to do before you die: we started one at least?41: Have you pre-named your children: HAVE I EVER40: Last person I got mad at: horst39: I would like to move to: bed38: I wish I was a professional: bed. I mean artist[ My Favorites ]37: Candy: Reeses36: Vehicle: bus35: President: Guiney34: State visited: California sounds so cliche but. I mean.33: Cellphone provider: idc32: Athlete: Yuna Kim31: Actor: *mumbleslumbles*30: Actress: too many to choose from help29: Singer: selena gomez obvious28: Band: selena gomez and the slene27: Clothing store: my mom’s closet26: Grocery store: Publix25: TV show: Galavant, Stranger Things, Community in the earlier seasons...24: Movie: I watched Boy Meets Girl lately and it was Fantastic23: Website: fernferction.dert.nert22: Animal: snow leopard21: Theme park: harry potter. world.20: Holiday: Tubishvat19: Sport to watch: ice skating18: Sport to play: night tennis17: Magazine: Elves Weekly16: Book: let’s not open this can of worms I need to go to bed15: Day of the week: tuesday14: Beach: all beaches are great13: Concert attended: Midori performing the Mendelssohn left a really lasting impression on me forever12: Thing to cook: eggs11: Food: eggs10: Restaurant: Tuk Tuk Thai Loft 9: Radio station: GPB OBVIOUSLY8: Yankee candle scent: wat7: Perfume: no6: Flower: azalea5: Color: jewel tones4: Talk show host: Stephen Colbert3: Comedian: andrew hussie2: Dog breed: cats1: Did you answer all these truthfully? of course
I hope this satisfies u u hellspawn
1 note
·
View note
Note
Random question about European musicals: - Your top 3 (+ why + did you see it live + any random anecdote about them?) - Des bons musicals en français? Parce que j'aime bien ça mais j'en connais pas des masses qui sont en français je me dis ce serait l'occasion d'en voir quelques uns
OOOOOH : I like that one ! Hmmmm… Let’s exclude West End for this one, otherwise I’ll never get to a top three
Top 3 (in no particular order)
Notre Dame de Paris (special mention Roméo & Juliette et Starmania)
Tanz Der Vampire
Les Misérables (I mean at the starting point it’s french, though I do admit I very much prefer the 1991 version with the additions of the West End adaptation) and although it’s an adaptation as well, I love Dracula Das Musical especially with Thomas Borchert and Uwe Kröger. (special mention : Rebecca das Musical | I’m only discovering german musicals tbh and I really like what I heard so far but I have not listened much to Rebecca even though I like what I’ve heard and read so far)
Reasons / Live / Anecdote
NDdP : First I grew up with this soundtrack. The first musical soundtrack I’ve heard was NDdP (and Starmania and then came R&J). I was basically in love and crushing over the whole cast. I did not understand everything and every word but I knew half of the concept album by heart. I think it’s a whole as well, I love the music, the lyrics and growing up and opening myself to the world I realized how the story was still relevant today (that’s why I love Hugo) and how the staging was incredibly smart in this way. I have not seen it live yet, but I have my ticket for when they’ll tour near my hometown in April so soon ! As for an anecdote. Hmmmm…. I find it funny that Garou first auditionned for Frollo. Idk why but sometimes I imagine this and I really have either a hard time picturing it or laughing too hard.
TDV : why I like it. Let’s be completely honest, the first time I heard about it was when they played it at Mogador. And there was this promo on TV and I was not really watching but then I turned suddenly “Wait, isn’t this Total Eclipse of the Heart ?????” I was really confused. I let it go for a while, not giving anther thought but later on I was skyping with my bet friend and it came to my mind again and went to search the summary and see if I could like it. I found some part really great so I read it aloud to my best friend and really he’s not a musical enthusiast but I was pretty curious and still to this day we have to watch it together (I mean I’ve seen it but not yet with him xD). What I like in this is the character of Sarah and her “yeah whatever” attitude towards Alfred, she makes her own decisions and I like that. I love the character of Herbet as well and I love the music as well. I don’t have any anecdote though I saw a picture of Christopher Lee and Thomas Borchert after the opening night of TDV in 2009 (?) and apparently Lee really likde the musical and I just like this because I admire Christopher Lee in many ways not only for his acting career and yeah. Oh and I’ve not seen it live either. Only bootlegs.
Dracula Das Musical : I discovered the musical only a couple months ago. I had heard Thomas Borchert in TDV and I really liked his voice so I looked up his other credits and I found a video of Die Verführung of the Graz production of the musical and I loved it a lot. Loved the music, loved the cast and since I don’t speak German but it’s still close to English I try to decipher and try to understand what they mean and whenever I’m correct or not far from the turth I’m just “yay \o/ !” and so it fuels my want to learn German. I have not seen it live either but there’s the pro-shot video of the Graz production on YT so it’s planned on my “to-watch” list for very soon. The only anecdote I know about this musical is that this song, Zu Ende, was written specifically for Thomas Borchert and Uwe Kröger. In the original version Dracula and Van Helsing don’t have a duet or a song together and Thomas and Uwe are two of the most famous names in the German musical industry and it would have been a crime not to have them both singing in the same song so here.
French Musicals / Musicals in French Rec
it really all depends on what you search in a musical, the story, the songs, the musics, but I’ll give a list of the ones I like, but bear in mind it’s only my view and that there are plenty others that can interest you ;) !
Notre Dame de Paris (x) : my all-time favourite french musicals and even in my all-time favourite musicals list period. Amazing songs and lyrics, great music, amazing cast, simple yet brilliant staging and choreography. I love this musical I know most of the songs by heart and ugh did I mention I LOVE THIS MUSICAL ????
Starmania (x) : the second musical I heard when I was very young. I love the story and the songs are really great. One of the very first musical in France departing itself from “opérette” (hence the “opéra rock” mention).
Roméo & Juliette, de la Haine à l’Amour (x) : After NNdP and Starmania I heard R&J. Someone had gifted it to my older brother but he never listened to it. So I sneaked into his room and took the CD and listened to it. I was in love. I listened to it all the time, knew all the concept album by heart and developped a crush on Frédéric Charter aka The Prince. I loved the songs, loved the costumes, the story, great, great I loved it.
Le Roi Soleil (x) : not amazing but not bad it’s okay I guess. I liked it when i watched the DVD a few years ago. I only know the singles for this one though. Beautiful costumes and some good songs (some that are not well known like Entre Ciel et Terre)
Cléopâtre, La Dernière d’Egypte (x) : not on the same as the first three, but better than Le Roi Soleil for me. Great choreography, strong point of this musical and actual poc playing poc roles. Not exceptional but interesting to watch.
Le Petit Prince (x) : not as well known as the others but really poetic and Daniel Lavoie A++++. It’s really too bad it’s not known more. I bought the DVD recently so I can watch it again soon.
Oliver Twist, Le Musical (x) : it’s a new french musical, it’s playing now at La Salle Gaveau in Paris and I’d love to see it but I bought the cast album and it’s amazing ! Very broadway-like I feel the need to spread this musical whenever I can !!!
Les Misérables (french concept album 1980 & 1991 revival cast) : if I’m honest it’s my all time favourite musical (did I mention I love Hugo’s work ?). The french concept album is pretty interesting and otherwise known as Disco!Jolras (you’ll see why). The 1991 revival cast contains all the new songs added in 1985 for the West End production and the new arrangements. I really love the 1991 revival production and I’m so pissed it did not receive the success it deserved. The 1991 cast has my favourite Marius, Jérôme Pradon, he’s the cutest and Julien Combey as Enjolras is so convincing and good ! Great Javert too !!
Mamma Mia! (x) : don’t judge me but I love this musical, I’m always a sucker for ABBA and the french version was actually great ?? I think the translations were actually pretty good and Jérôme Pradon’s in it so that’s a plus. (I have the french cast album if you want, send me an IM and I’ll give you a link to dl it).
Special mention to Le Bal des Vampires (TDV) and La Belle et La Bête as well that have good french productions.
Thank you so much for this ask !!
3 notes
·
View notes