#i have seen some critics say Schulman stalked an ex of hers but have been unable to find an account from the victim alleging that
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
After reading tons of people whose opinions I respect either hail it as essential reading or tear into it as abuse apolagia I have finally decided to actually read Conflict is not abuse" by Sarah Schulman and I gotta say, I think its message is really undercut by Sarah Schulman's apparrent belief that cutting someone off makes you the devil.
Like, for a book ostensibly about not overstating harm it is deeply ironic how apocalyptically it portrays the very mundane act of "not wanting to talk to someone." It's Childish. Tyrranical. Poisonous to individuals and entire communities alike. If you send someone an email asking them not to contact you anymore you are ruining your own ability to have healthy relationships with anyone. Ever. People like this should be forced into conversation with whoever they wish to avoid and it would be for their own sake because the mere act of not talking is so inherently harmful it cannot be allowed to occur, at any cost.
Every time the book says something I think is profound and useful and I start nodding along it is inevitably followed by a take that blocking someone on social media means you have the mental development of a toddler. Or that if someone is "hiding behind technology" (only wishing to talk to someone over the phone instead of face to face) this is a collective problem that the entire community needs to band together around to prevent, no matter what the person doing the "shunning" thinks. In the book's own words: "More and more people have to join in together to create change. The conversation is not over just because an escalator insists that it is."
As a reader, that attitude seems like the exact kind of militant overly paranoid thinking that a book like "Conflict Is Not Abuse" would want to prevent, but as I read further the overwhelming impression I get is that Sarah Schulman is actually fine with endlessly harangueing someone and turning their entire community against them, as long as it's for the crime of shit-talking your ex and not wanting to be around them.
#Sarah Schulman#conflict is not abuse#i am- perhaps appropiately- very *conflicted* about this book#i think it says good things! but it also says some absolutley mind-boggling shit#i have seen some critics say Schulman stalked an ex of hers but have been unable to find an account from the victim alleging that#so i have commited myself to not letting that accusation color my impression of the book#what i HAVE found is a blogpost by sarah where she details a long-past relationship that ended badly (she does not describe how)#as a result of which said ex now shoots sarah down with 'i don't want to talk to you' on the very rare occassions they cross paths#sarah refes to this as her ex 'blaming and hurting me'#and gleefully recounts seeing pictures of said ex online and finding out she'd gained weight. in sarah's words she 'looks horrible'#which she attributes to the mental wound of blaming her ex from 17 years ago#now. that's not abuse. let's be very clear about that#HOWEVER. being so hung up on an ex not wanting to talk to you#that you fantasize about their ~horrible vindictiveness~ (which is the only reason anyone would ever cut you out of their life.)#making them miserable forever. And getting all of this from a SOCIAL MEDIA PHOTO... does not paint her in a very flattering light.#and a personal impression of the author need not color the interpretation of the book either but here they do reflect e/o spectacularly
11 notes
·
View notes