#i actually finished it back in april and i tried backdating the post for that but. it doesn't always show | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

wonwoomi · 8 years ago

Text

one year on.

so, i’m a little late with this (aren’t I always), but april 4th at 19 minutes past midnight british standard time was wonwoo’s one year anniversary. some of you might know that I’ve been with mi since it reopened in december 2015, so whilst it isn’t my anniversary, it’s still !! extremely exciting for me and for my dumb son who hasn’t shut up about it since it happened.

wonwoo is the first muse i’ve played that... stretched my comfort zone. his twisted morals, his history, a great deal of his interests and even his softest hopes and dreams are all characteristics I’d never tried before. it was actually bek that persuaded me to play him for real. he’d been knocking around in my head, bothering me, for a little while, but I’d have had to drop my old muse to bring him in and I felt so guilty about potentially doing it. but it got to a point where I didn’t enjoy my old muse anymore, because I knew that I was just keeping him around to please others, when I really wanted to play this loser. so I dropped, and I brought wonwoo in immediately and it’s the best decision I’ve ever made. now I have a wonderful wife, a thoroughly developed muse (who just keeps on surprising me; just yesterday he informed me of his desire to garden. I don’t even fucking know), and a home here with you all at murder inc.

so. in honour of wonwoo’s one year, we’re going to take a trip down memory lane. we’re going to take a look back at as many of the most amusing and most defining moments in wonwoo’s first year here with you all. thank you for being here with him, with me, for however long or short you have been. I love and appreciate every single one of you so incredibly much. here’s to many more years to come! ♥

april !

one night in a strange city. precious mingyu’s 20th birthday and the night wonwoo knew that the tall fucker would be far more important to him than he could ever have anticipated. also, the longest replies I’ve ever written; it was wild.

the fact that hyoseong and wonwoo’s first thread involved him being the one to steal the kill. he’ll never let this go. I promise you. never. ( @mixhyoseong )

may !

wonwoo taking the Big Scary Step to actually ask for help when he’s injured! it’s a god damn miracle!! god bless jinwoo and his everlasting patience. god bless their friendship.

( NSFW ) that One Time wonwoo was forced to go to a strip club with his worst enemy.

zitao flooding him with compliments and dinner, and wonwoo going along with it because he loves free food. he’d probably have manipulated zitao into buying him more dinners; I apologise for my son, he’s an asshole.

wonhao. just wonhao. so cute.

june !

that probably over-dramatic and definitely intense meanie meme wherein wonwoo Fucked Up and cried like a baby because he realises he can’t live without kim mingyu. i’m emo.

more free food, you guys really know the way to his heart.

july !

wonwoo starting to fall in love with kim mingyu.

guardians of the galaxy. or just seoul’s streets. or maybe they’re the ones you need protection from— who knows.

( TW HEAVY ) just this. just— wow. fucking hell, jinwoo.

I honestly love eris and wonwoo so much; this thread is so cute, they’re so cute,, #WONRIS4EVER ( @erisxmi )

wonwoo’s 20th birthday, wipes a tear.

wonwoo’s visit to jeongwoo’s grave, in which he talks about his childhood and his resentment towards his parents. this stressed me out a lot, but it felt so satisfying to finish and to explore more of his twisted viewpoints and his relationship with his biological family.

august !

surprise! wonwoo is a soft child who loves — but is horrifically bad at — scrapbooking. wonwoo still adds to this all the time.

wonwoo’s life playlist. the open event that marked bek and I becoming mods. again, i’m emo. (you’re always welcome to make these at any time, by the way!!)

wonwoo sinking (for lack of a better word) deeper into the sadness created by his feelings for mingyu; believing so, so deeply that he’d never get to tell him how he felt. jokes on you, son.

september !

wonwoo’s thread with everyone’s favourite grandpa ♥ ( @jisukjinxmi )

and his thread with @mixhyoyeon, who persuaded him to break into a club; something he never imagined he’d do, but is glad he can now add to his list of strange experiences.

mingyu’s decline. wonwoo stepping up to the plate to take care of him, being completely and hopelessly in love with him and spending night after night crying himself to sleep over nightmares of mingyu not making it. sad. sad, sad, sad.

october !

thIS

the hardest month of mingyu’s depression. a lot happened between them, for their bond and his recovery. wonwoo secretly took on all of mingyu’s hits alongside his own, to keep their statuses in the gang. he started his long break from the cafe, and focused as much of his time on helping mingyu recover. his health deteriorated rapidly.

november !

just his and @mixheecheon’s dynamic. their conversation. i love it, i love this thread.

november 18th marks meanie’s first (and second, and third, and fourth and so on) kiss and the start of their relationship. wonwoo gives mingyu the journal he’d written in over mingyu’s depression to help him cope. starts thinking about his own recovery, too.

december !

meanie’s one month anniversary.

wonwoo’s !! favourite time of the year is christmas, so he was very, very happy all month. he decorated the whole apartment, spent the big day with mingyu and his grandfather, and delivered presents to eris and @miroyce beforehand, and he was just !! so happy !!

posted in january, but timeline wise, wonwoo visiting jeongwoo’s grave once more, only to come into contact with changwoo, and get the sort-of closure he’s needed all these years.

january !

the thread itself is backdated, but january marked the start of one of my favourite threads!! I love more opportunities to explore young wonwoo’s life and his growth into who he is today, and I love his and hyungwon’s backstory and dynamic, so thank you for plotting and writing this with me!! ( @mixnightingale )

february !

wonwoo getting aRRESTED (about time)

the start of this great friendship rivalry ( @sujimi )

and this one, too! their bickering gives me life,, ( @mixminhyuk )

march & april !

mingyu buying wonwoo fLOWERS (spoiler: wonwoo cried)

i’ve been incredibly busy with uni work this past month, so I haven’t had the chance to post much, but getting to chat with you all and plot, and at times, even rp in the ims, has been wonderful and I want to thank all of you again for your patience. it’s been a rollercoaster of a year and I can’t wait for the next anniversary to come rushing around before I know it. I love you all ♥

#ww.ooc #( this is long as heck )#( i think i got everything but if i missed anyone I am sorry!! ;; )#( i tried to go through his archive but I found myself remembering things I'd missed so I may have missed more ;; )#( i love each and every one of you so much! thank you for everything ♥ )

15 notes · View notes

meyanderings · 8 years ago

Text

Still here?

Life in Rome got pretty hectic, pretty fast. I regret not having had more time to keep up the writing, but I’ve tried to make up for it by posting pictures of the most beautiful thing I’d encounter each day… I do admit, sometimes my pictures are backdated, generally for one of two reasons: I would either not have left the house that day, or I would have taken multiple pictures on some other day that I felt merited posting too. Anyway, the point is that this blog is serving as a diary of sorts, and since I quite like Polaroids, I’m planning to print out the pictures at some point too.

Now, as always, the warmer days seem to be bringing the need to write back. It’s either that, or else the warmer, longer days are bringing more opportunities to sip spritz at 17.00, and that is, in turn, oiling the writing cogs somewhere in the depths of my brain.

At this point, I’d like to point out that what follows was actually written late last night, over a nice glass of chilled white wine (it felt like it was too late for spritz then).

Today was a typical back-to-work kind of morning (and afternoon). After the most deliciously lazy five days I’ve had in a very long time, with temperatures reaching 23 degrees and cloudless skies, today dawned grey and drizzly with the prospect of five and a half hours of teaching (and a commute from one end of Rome to the other, give or take a few kilometers).

As always, there wasn’t enough time for me to wash the breakfast things AND do my hair and makeup, so I chose to not touch my wind-tangled mess of curls and somehow made it to work on time. Business as usual, except everyone made a fuss about my (direct quote) “lovely” hair. Apparently, I give the impression that my hair IS a messy pineapple atop my head. I guess I need to wear it down slightly more often, if only for the fact that it allegedly makes me look younger - although I’m not sure I want that when I’m teaching students twice my age, but anyway. The female in me appreciates (read, loves) the compliment.

The rest of the day was pretty uneventful.

Until it was time to go home - or, in my case, my next teaching venue. I had been dreading the departure because the sky had since made good on its promise and grey had turned to overcast, until it started pouring with the kind of force that is expected after five gloriously sunny and warm days in the middle of April.

On my way out, sunglasses defiantly in place (because they are my first barrier against overly friendly people on the metro), I ran into three of my students. Who love to practise their English by asking how I am and where I’m going etc. Naturally, my reply that I teach till 21.00 attracted the sympathetic looks of people who had been at the office since 09.00 that morning. What I didn’t expect was for one of them to decide that, actually, his eight hours of work were enough for the day, and that he could leave right then and give me a lift to my destination. I did the “oh, but I can take the metro” thing, but the tired and hungry little girl in me was cheering like crazy.

And, just like that, the boring commute in a stuffy train was made a thousand times more pleasant. The sun had started to shine by the time we left the offices, enough for the windows to be rolled down. I watched Rome go by as I made conversation in my beautifully broken Italian.

It wasn’t that I was having a particularly bad day; okay, my sinuses were (are) painfully blocked and I had spent three hours teaching Conditionals, but I like teaching and I like my students. And it’s not that I hate the metro - it’s actually quite efficient (when it’s running) and I don’t mind watching people (except when my nose is stuck in their armpit). In reality, I probably prefer to be travelling to work by metro in Rome, to driving my car in traffic in Malta. It was just that the small act of kindness afforded me the odd thirty minutes to have my coffee (not spritz, because the role of responsible teacher has to be maintained somehow) sitting down by the fountain, instead of standing up at the bar.

Perhaps it wasn’t even that, as much as the fact that, as I stepped out of the (rather fancy) car, amid repeated grazie milles and ma di ches and ciao, ci vediamos, I started to think of all the small things that have the power to actually turn my day around. Sometimes, it seems as if my mood changes at the drop of a hat. But I do realise, when I think about it, that that’s probably because I engage with so many people every day. I guess it’s partly what makes me suitable for my job; I often wonder where English teacher blends with psychologist. Except I don’t offer advice; I just listen and provide the odd word here and there, correct pronunciation and grammar where necessary, and promise to forget what is being said the moment the lesson finishes. I suppose knowing when to keep quiet is a very precious skill (I always knew those 60-something psychology credits I did during my undergrad years would come in handy one day).

Anyhow, today, the realisation - if you can call it such - was once again about how much gratitude my days here involve. Not always, of course, but, overall, I do feel that my days are often characterised by the gratefulness I am filled with towards some person or another.

Today, it was this student who took me to work. Yesterday, it was a friend of a friend who welcomed me into her family’s beach house and fed me (amazing food). On Friday, it was the lady who let me cuddle her puppy and be comforted by it. The day before, it was a waiter who quietly had the meal I wanted prepared specifically, even though it wasn’t on the menu that day. Sometimes, it’s some other student who buys me a much-needed coffee or a bus driver who sees me running in his side-mirror and waits for me before he drives off. Other times, it’s the barman who gives me a chocolate or biscotto even though I order fresh orange juice rather than coffee (because, at the beginning, I used to buy the one sweet thing to satisfy my sweet tooth).

I know that this might seem as if nothing bad ever happens (it does!) or that I spend the day running around with a massive smile on my face meeting randomly kind strangers or students (although I do spend the day running around). It’s just that being here, in Rome, means that my family can’t act as my safety net on a daily basis. My boyfriend does an amazing job at it, and my circle of friends also, but it’s obviously different. Starting life over in this way makes you both stronger and incredibly more vulnerable, in my opinion, because you have no option but to open yourself up to people. Whether I liked it or not, I had to acknowledge the fact that I am not, and will never be, unaffected by the people around me.

It’s totally not just the people with whom I have an actual relationship that have the power to influence my mood and my day. I mean, imagine me, with my limited Italian, sitting in front of an accountant who is explaining the proceedings behind opening and putting a Partita IVA (VAT number) into use. It was the first time I had met this middle-aged lady with the teeniest poodle imaginable running circles around my legs, but if she had decided that my shortcomings in Italian were my problem, and that she couldn’t do anything to help me understand better, I would have probably decided to pack my bags and return to Malta come May. But she didn’t. She sought the aid of coffee and multiple textbook diagrams on taxation, and, two hours later, I left her office (exhausted and) able to explain the whole thing to my mother on the phone. It was only later that I realised that I had been completely at her mercy that day. Looking back, in fact, I get goosebumps when I recall how many of these instances me and my boyfriend had to go through these past seven months.

I guess the bottom line here is that living abroad is difficult: it necessarily leaves you much more exposed than one could imagine from the comfort of one’s own country. The culture, language and the way everyday life is conducted can leave you perplexed and lost at the best of times. But living abroad gives you the opportunity to not only learn a new language, to meet new people and experience new cultures; it also allows you to look at yourself in a different manner and to reevaluate what actually matters. In other words, it teaches you self-discipline and patience, perseverance and gratitude all at once. It brings the whole concept of appreciating the small things in life and people in general into much sharper focus. Living abroad is so much less about gaining experience in a particular field, than about widening one’s perspective and learning about what living means.

#living abroad #lifestyle #gratitude #learning #life lessons #perspective #culture #language #people #rome #mydailyrome #blogpost #beauty #day106

1 note · View note

legit-scam-review · 6 years ago

Text

What You Should Know About Craig Wright

Recently, it was revealed that Craig Steven Wright, one of the most controversial figures in the crypto community, had filed 114 blockchain patents since 2017. He also quit Twitter, where he would often publish his opinions on anonymity (bad), Bitcoin SV (the real Bitcoin) and other cryptocurrencies (also bad).

He is also known for arguing that he is actually Satoshi Nakamoto, the original creator of Bitcoin. Here’s the complete list of things you should know about Wright.

Wright’s bio is really rich, but hardly verifiable

He was born in October 1970 in Australia, according to registration papers of one of his many companies. As per a Business Insider article citing his now-edited LinkedIn profile, Wright graduated from Brisbane’s Padua Catholic College in 1987. In the early 1990s, he worked as a sauce cook, “having trained in French cuisine,” and spent three years working with a catering company.

Wright was reportedly studying at the University of Queensland while working as a chef. He initially attended engineering classes, but switched to computer science in his fourth year.

In 1996, as per his earlier LinkedIn bio, he began working at Ozemail, where he was “managing a bunch of engineers,” thus starting his eventful career in tech. However, according to a 2007 Computerworld article, he began working in IT when he joined K-Mart in 1985 — which would have been even before he finished high school.

In April 1997, Wright says he joined the Australian Stock Exchange, maintaining security and firewalls. In November the same year, he launched a company called DeMorgan, described as “a pre-IPO Australian listed company focused on alternative currency, next generation banking and reputational and educational products with a focus on security and creating a simple user experience.”

In fact, up until July 2015, Morgan was the CEO of about 15 companies. As the Guardian points out, in the space of a week, he resigned as director from Cloudcroft Pty Ltd, Coin-Exch Pty Ltd, Daso Pty Ltd, Demorgan Holdings Pty Ltd, Demorgan Ltd, Denariuz, Ezas Pty Ltd, Integyrz Pty Ltd, Misfit Games Pty Ltd, Interconnected Research Pty Ltd, Zuhl Pty Ltd and Pholus Pty Ltd, and remained the director of just three companies: Hotwire Preemptive Intelligence Pty Ltd, Panopticrypt Pty Ltd and Hotwire PE Employee Share Plan Pty Ltd. Currently, his LinkedIn only features a startup called nChain, where he has allegedly been working as a “chief scientist” since June 2015.

Wright seems to be a man of libertarian views. According to the Cypherpunk mailing list archive, in September 1996, Wright wrote that he had developed cancer during his years at university and took a loan to pay for medical treatment because the health insurance didn’t cover it. He then mentioned that he served in the military and worked at a gas station “even though I am an engineer,” adding:

“So why and for what reason should I have to pay several 10’s of thousands each year to support others. I have never taken help from the government, I do not feel I should have to pay as well. And what am I paying for…to protect the status quo. I believe that there is more than enough help for ppl available. They just need to get off their butts and work.”

In sum, Wright’s biography seems to be considerably replete and busy — or, at least, he portrays it that way. On top of having two PhDs, Wright wields numerous certifications in computer forensics and information technology (IT). In February, he published two Medium articles in which he claimed to have worked as an “agent of influence” in Venezuela and Colombia. Picturing himself as a James Bond-esque character fighting terrorism and evil, Wright says he was “shot twice” during the operation. Also, at some point, he claims that he “was a pastor once.”

According to his story, the Australian entrepreneur came back from South America to witness Bitcoin — which he created (more about that below) — being used on the darknet.

“I discovered the creation I had given birth to, something I designed to bring light was being used for all the worst reasons. Not only drugs, but people. Anonymity is a curse. Nothing good comes of it.”

Wright has several times claimed that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, and refused to provide sufficient proof

Wright become a known figure in crypto community after media reports linking his identity to Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, surfaced in late 2015. Previously, in 2014, one of his few reported links to cryptocurrencies was that he tried launching the world’s first Bitcoin bank.

Thus, in December 2015, Wired and Gizmodo reported within hours of each other that the Australian computer scientist and entrepreneur might be the creator of the world’s largest cryptocurrency.

The Wired story claimed that Wright “either invented bitcoin or is a brilliant hoaxer who very badly wants us to believe he did.” It was based on documents and emails that were purportedly leaked by “an anonymous source close to Wright” to an independent security researcher Gwern Branwen, who co-wrote the article with Wired author Andy Greenberg.

Similarly, Gizmodo ran a story that featured documents allegedly obtained by a hacker who accessed Wright’s email accounts, claiming that Satoshi Nakamoto was a joint pseudonym for Craig Steven Wright and his friend, computer forensics analyst and cybersecurity specialist David Kleiman, who died in 2013.

Moreover, on the same day the articles were published, Australian Federal Police (AFP) raided Wright’s house in the Sydney suburb of Gordon. However, the AFP clarified that the operation was not related to the Bitcoin claims.

A substantial part of the evidence presented in the reports — along with Wright’s previous claims — was soon proved false. First, Wright’s company Cloudcroft had declared to have two supercomputers, one of which allegedly produced by computer manufacturer SGI. However, SGI soon clarified that “Cloudcroft has never been an SGI customer and SGI has no relationship with Cloudcroft CEO Craig Steven Wright.”

Further, Wright had listed two PhDs on his LinkedIn page, including one from Charles Sturt University. Eventually, Forbes contacted the university and found out that it hadn’t granted Wright any PhDs, although it gave him three master’s degrees in networking and systems administration, management (IT), and information systems security. Wright was, however, awarded with a doctorate degree by Charles Sturt University later in 2017.

Also, a technical analysis of two PGP public keys attributed to Wright, but also linked to Satoshi Nakamoto, showed that they were created more recently than the documents in which they were featured.

Finally, a number of posts in Wright’s now-deleted blog that seemed to portray him as a person who was directly involved in Bitcoin’s creation had been backdated or edited; the archived versions of the posts from 2013 show none of those breadcrumbs that Wright could have planted to mislead the media into thinking he is Satoshi.

After the aforementioned stories went live, Wright promptly took down his social media accounts and disappeared for several months. On May 2, 2016, he came back (he now lives in London, United Kingdom, according to his LinkedIn profile) and publicly declared that he is the creator of Bitcoin. Later on in the same month, Wright published a sentimental apology piece where he refused to publish the proof of access to one of the earliest Bitcoin keys, saying he doesn’t have the “courage” do it.

However, Wright still claims to be the pseudonymous Bitcoin creator. Just last month, the entrepreneur filed two near-identical comment letters to the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in which he again declared that he is Satoshi. The documents were submitted in response to the agency’s request for industry input and feedback on Ethereum’s (ETH) mechanics and market.

Specifically, Wright wrote that he worked “under the pseudonym of Satoshi Nakamoto,” and “completed a project […] started in 1997 that was filed with the Australian government in part under an AusIndustry project registered with the Dept. of Innovation as BlackNet.”

BlackNet — an alleged precursor to Bitcoin — was submitted to the Australian government in 2001, according to one of Wright’s tweets (he deleted his Twitter profile earlier this month).

On Reddit, user Skoopitup argued that the BlackNet paper that Wright supposedly submitted in 2001 largely copied the official Bitcoin white paper (published October 2008), which notably contained significant corrections to an earlier draft that had been shared by Satoshi earlier in August 2008.

In his remaining comments to the CFTC, Wright wrote:

“The amount of misunderstanding and fallacious information that has been propagated concerning bitcoin […] has resulted in my choice to start to become more public. The system I created was designed in part to end fraud as best as that can be done with any technology. The lack of understanding […] has resulted in […] a dissemination of old scams.”

The Australian entrepreneur still hasn’t signed a message with the key associated with Bitcoin’s genesis block, which could be seen as strong evidence of him actually being Satoshi Nakamoto.

Wright played a key role in the BCH hash wars — and now claims that Bitcoin SV is the original Bitcoin

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) is a cryptocurrency that emerged on Aug. 1, 2017 after departing from Bitcoin’s original blockchain via a hard fork in an attempt to manage its scalability issue.

The BCH network performs hard forks as part of scheduled protocol upgrades. The fork scheduled for Nov. 15, 2018, however, was disrupted by a competing proposal that was not compatible with the original roadmap. As a result, the BCH community was split into three fractions: Bitcoin ABC, Bitcoin Unlimited and Bitcoin SV.

Craig Wright lead the Bitcoin SV team, whose goal was to restore “the original Satoshi protocol” by changing the current BCH structure. Specifically, that involved entirely overwriting the network scripts of Bitcoin ABC and increasing the block size of BCH from 32MB to a maximum of 128MB in order to increase network capacity and scale. Bitcoin SV’s cryptocurrency design was made by Wright’s nChain company.

At some point, after Jihan Wu, co-founder of major crypto miner and manufacturer Bitmain, who supported the Bitcoin ABC team, accused Wright of being a Blockstream spy and a “fake Satoshi.” In response, the computer scientist entered a verbal fight. Specifically, Wright tagged Roger Ver — another ABC proponent — and Bitmain with bankruptcy threats and accusations of being engaged in Silk Road machinations and child pornography.

Even though Bitcoin ABC essentially won the so-called “hash wars” and secured the original BCH ticker, Bitcoin SV lives on. In late February, Bitcoin SV’s value rose 20 percent, driving it into the top-10 largest cryptocurrencies by market cap. As of press time, Bitcoin SV is the 12th-largest token, with a market cap of $1.5 million, according to CoinMarketCap.

Craigh Wright has a lot of blockchain patents

According to the publication Hard Fork, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has published 155 patents applications filed by Wright — all of which were submitted through his company nChain. Thirty-five of those were published this year. The earliest document date relates to Aug. 31, 2017.

The majority of those applications mention blockchain. Specifically, Hard Fork writes, the term “blockchain” was used 114 times in patent titles. “Cryptocurrency,” in turn, is only featured six times, while “Bitcoin” is not mentioned at all.

Wright has written about his patents quest via Twitter (which has been deleted). According to the screenshots cited by Hard Fork, Wright decided to file his patents in Europe because it was “harder”:

“Once we have the EU, we have the PCT [Patent Cooperation Treaty] in the USA. The US is simpler.”

The Patent Cooperation Treaty has been signed by 152 countries. After filing one international patent application under the PCT, applicants can get simultaneously protection for their inventions in many countries.

As per Bloomberg, business-wise blockchain patents “are an essential ingredient for companies looking to reshape the financial services industry or spawn profitable cryptocurrency-related businesses.” Basically, such patents help companies attract investment, protect property rights and collect monopoly profits from other companies using their inventions.

It’s been argued that Wright is filing patents without the intent of actually using them, but instead to demand large payouts from companies which happen to use similar technologies in their line of work. As Marc Kaufman, an attorney who co-chairs the Blockchain Intellectual Property Council at the U.S. Chamber of Digital Commerce, told Fortune:

“His tactics and activities have all the marks of being a patent assertion entity or what’s pejoratively known as a troll. I’m not aware of his companies having any products.”

Craig Wright is being sued for at least $1 billion

In February 2018, the estate of David Kleiman — Wright’s associate and computer forensics expert who died in April 2013 seemingly of natural causes related to complications from a MRSA infection — brought the suit against Wright to the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Florida. The estate is represented by Ira Kleiman, David’s brother.

According to court documents that surfaced on Reddit, the plaintiff claims that Wright stole hundreds of thousands of BTC, worth over $5 billion dollars at the time, from David Kleiman’s estate. The statement by the plaintiff alleges that Wright recognized that Kleiman’s friends and family were initially unaware of the wealth he accumulated.

Specifically, the statement reads, Wright “forged a series of contracts that purported to transfer Dave’s assets to Craig and/or companies controlled by him. Craig backdated these contracts and forged Dave’s signature on them.”

Wright contacted Kleiman’s estate after his associate’s death and disclosed that he and David had worked together to develop blockchain and Bitcoin, according to the plaintiff.

In December 2018, new documents were published online, indicating that the court had rejected repeated requests from the nChain chief scientist to dismiss the lawsuit.

In an amended lawsuit supported by Judge Beth Bloom, a figure of 300,000 BTC ($1.5 billion as of press time) was now circulating.

“The Court finds that Plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged a claim for conversion,” the court document confirms, continuing:

“The Amended Complaint alleges that Defendant converted at least 300,000 bitcoins upon Dave’s death and transferred them to various international trusts, which was an unauthorized act that deprived the Plaintiffs of the bitcoins therein. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ claim for conversion […] survives Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.”

In March 2019, Jeff Garzik, one of the earliest contributors to the Bitcoin codebase, was reportedly subpoenaed by the court for documents relating to the Kleiman vs. Wright complaint.

Specifically, the court demanded “all documents, communications, and agreements that support his [Jeff’s] personal theory that Dave Kleiman is Satoshi Nakamoto.” In a 2018 interview with Bloomberg, Garzik suggested that Dave Kleiman was the original creator of Bitcoin.

Wright doesn’t have a particularly good relationship with crypto community

After some of the aforementioned inconsistencies related to Wright’s claim that he is Satoshi surfaced, the crypto community became increasingly skeptical about the Australian computer scientist. However, some of his claims in regard to other cryptocurrencies certainly didn’t help.

In January 2019, for instance, he called Andreas Antonopoulos, author of the book “Mastering Bitcoin,” a “shitcoin expert.” In February this year, Wright told CNBC Africa’s Ran Neuner in a rather rude form that he knows how to deanonymize and destroy privacy coins Zcash and Monero, which he apparently is going to do “sometime this year”:

“If you have a privacy coin, I will show you that it is basically as private as running through Times Square with your pants around your ankles.”

In October 2017, in a now-deleted tweet, Wright argued that the Lightning Network was “oversold.”

At the 2018 Deconomy conference in Seoul, South Korea, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin publicly questioned Wright’s competence, calling him a fraud.

“Given he makes so many non-sequiturs and mistakes, why is this fraud allowed to speak at this conference?”

In response, Wright tweeted: “Oh well…. looks like I broke Vitalek… He is a twig.. must remember to be gentle next time ….”

Last week, the Australian entrepreneur deleted his Twitter page after removing over 10,000 tweets.

On March 17, not long before erasing his presence on the social media outlet, Wright tweeted that he will be “taking action aggressively to remove any site that is in error or makes false claims,” referring to people calling him a fraud, among other things.

“You do not have a right to lies under ‘free speech’ nor harassment, nor libel and slander,” he wrote. “If an error is reported in a malicious context concerning me, expect to be living in a barrel when we finish with you.”