#humans consists of 80% of biological males and she happens to be one of them but also happens to be that she(“he”?) can give birth
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Women who chose selective ab// by gender
Women who chose selective ab// by gender, they probably think that the humans are 80% biologically male and they(she) are one of them, they just happen to give birth.
#males don't want female children because presumably#1. they treated women wrong in their life so they wouldn't want to see that same treatment to their child-daughter; they will directly feel#hurt. 2. daughters can't inherit surnames to their children (which is an assumption; it can be possible; very very very possible if...#-the man doesn't care to inherit their surname or both agree for their child to have a double surname)#3. antient-tradition tied assumtion; again; while getting married; the daughter isn't yours anymore; again; will feel pain and worry#But when women don't like their little human's-fetus's gender is when I assume they must think that the earth's population of the#humans consists of 80% of biological males and she happens to be one of them but also happens to be that she(“he”?) can give birth#idk#Imagine you look at the innerwomb with sonography#you look at the nose#you look at that mounth#but no#....#instead they say let me check whether (-m-y-) child has a weanie/pipi/penis or not#which will be the only reason decided; if the pregnancy will be terminated or not#guys that's the reality we live in#we don't like more daughters and daughters#The ones who keep his second (and last-bby) daughter is a kind person and brave to have that child in their heart (I haven't seen“her”#though possible too; like when only the woman keeps the daughter they get divorced because of the first child's gender perhaps(?))#discrimination#feminism#sexism#sad story#edit; plus when you talk about how sometimes guys can confuse weddings with their understanding of a night club#that self-assumed bio-man wife thinks that it is an individual issue and thinks can now pity you#but#you know#you're saying that and later reminding she-her that they have daughters too and that same thing can also happen to them
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Let me look up the definition... My problem with Greg’s understanding of language
This morning I stumbled upon Onision disrespecting LaineyBot video. Here, Greg is trying to explain how language and words work. I have a problem with the way he claims using literal definitions is showing respect for the language you are speaking.
I’m not sure how many of you in this community are from Europe, but here (at least in my country and this part of the continent), we have high schools with special curriculums. We have medical schools, technical schools and so on.
The school I went to is a gymnasium, where students choose from 4 different fields of curriculum focus: general, linguistics and social sciences, informatics, and mathematics. The curriculum which I picked and finished is linguistic and social sciences, which means that my main focus for 4 years has been language. I’ve studied my native language, English, Latin, and German.
A gymnasium education takes four years following a compulsory eight or nine-year elementary education and ending with a final aptitude test called Matura. In these countries, the final test is standardized at the state level and can serve as an entrance qualification for universities. With the final test, we also have to pick one subject, write and defend our own thesis to graduate.
Why am I explaining this? Because I’ve spent four years studying language and social sciences, my finishing paper was about language and literature and I’ve finished my education with high grades.
As a result, it really pisses me off when Cucky McFucky decides to play the all-knowing here because he has no fucking clue how language works.
The first thing we were taught is: LANGUAGE IS A LIVING, CHANGING MATTER. And I don’t think you need to study language excessively to know that. Words evolve and they change their meanings all the time. I’d really love to see Onion boy trying to talk to Shakespeare because for the love of God the only way to respect your language is to blindly follow dictionaries.
I won’t be addressing how clueless he is about biology and social dynamics here because that is a whole other story.
But here we go:
First, what is language?
Language is a system that consists of the development, acquisition, maintenance, and use of complex systems of communication, particularly the human ability to do so; and a language is any specific example of such a system.
(I am aware that Wikipedia is not always the most reliable source, but on this particular subject, it’ll have to do. I could list my sources here and even retype paragraphs and paragraphs of official literature that supports these statements but it would be pointless considering that the literature would be unavailable to most people reading this. And if anyone is interested in more in-depth reading on the subject I’m sure you can find all of it online in the languages of your choosing.)
Languages evolve and diversify over time, and the history of their evolution can be reconstructed by comparing modern languages to determine which traits their ancestral languages must have had in order for the later developmental stages to occur.
But to notice how language changes you don’t have to study ancient languages, just pick an older person to talk to. Talk to your grandmother- chances are she is using words and phrases which you never use, or she uses those words differently than any person your age. If you don’t really feel like talking to old people go ahead and watch an 80′s movie or open an older book.
See the difference? Those changes don’t seem like a big deal, but they pile up and in about hundred years a language gets a complete makeover.
All languages change as speakers adopt or invent new ways of speaking and pass them on to other members of their speech community. Language change happens at all levels from the phonological level to the levels of vocabulary, morphology, syntax, and discourse. Even though language change is often initially evaluated negatively by speakers of the language who often consider changes to be "decay" or a sign of slipping norms of language usage, it is natural and inevitable.
But even if we disregard this phenomenon, language is not a simple set of rules. It consists of many layers. American English is a great example of that. A person born and raised in Texas uses language quite differently than a person born and raised in California. Things get even more diverse when we include class differences, levels of education, and age. These differences within a language are called dialects, sociolects, and idiolects.
In this particular video, Greg focuses on the definition of male and female.
He lists google definition of female:
femaleˈfiːmeɪl/
adjective
1.of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) which can be fertilized by male gametes." a herd of female deer"
noun
1.a female person, animal, or plant.
But let’s look at other definitions (I personally prefer Merriam-Webster dictionary).
Definition of female
1a (1): of, relating to, or being the sex that typically has the capacity to bear young or produce eggs
(2) : having or producing only pistils or pistillate flowers
b: made up of usually adult members of the female sex: consisting of
females
c: characteristic of girls, women, or the female sex: exhibiting
femaleness
d: designed for or typically used by girls or women
e: engaged in or exercised by girls or women
2: having some quality (such as small size or delicacy of sound) associated with the female sex
3: designed with a hollow or groove into which a corresponding male part fits
Oxford dictionary
female
1. Of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) which can be fertilized by male gametes.
1.1 Relating to or characteristic of women or female animals.
1.2 (of a plant or flower) having a pistil but no stamens.
1.3 (of parts of machinery, fittings, etc.) manufactured hollow so that a corresponding male part can be inserted.
Wiktionary
female (not comparable)
Belonging to the sex which typically produces eggs and/or, in mammals, has XX chromosomes.
Belonging to the feminine gender (social category).
(grammar, less common than 'feminine') Feminine; of the feminine grammatical gender.
(figuratively) Having an internal socket, as in a connector or pipe fitting.
This is how these four dictionaries define a female. Google, Merriam-Webster, Oxford, and Wiktionary all give slightly different definitions of a female. How can that be? Ever noticed how when you open an actual dictionary there is more than one definition listed?
The thing is a female (and it’s not the only example of how sometimes a simple little definition is not enough) is quite a broad concept. There are both biological and social connotations tied to it. And guess which is easier to define?
How does Greg identify males and females? Does he ask each and every person he meets about their ability to produce offsprings? What about people who are infertile? What about people who have certain chromosome variations? Women who can grow beards and men who have more pronounced breasts? How do they fit into this neat little definition?
Even if we stick to the binary division of only two sexes and genders, it is impossible to go strictly by biological definition in everyday life. I’m not saying we should completely ignore biological definition, but there is a reason biological definition is not the only one.
And what really annoys me is how he screams SCIENCE, even tho three seconds earlier he didn’t even know what’s spermatozoa.
Just because you google the fucking definition doesn’t mean you understand science, Greg. Science is one of those pesky little things where you really need to go in-depth to understand shit, Greg. People study biology for years, get specializations in specific fields, Greg. Believe it or not, actual people of science dedicate their entire lives to specific fields just to gain an actual, deeper understanding of how shit works. Science is not two seconds of googling it takes you to find whatever definition you like the best, Greg. If any of my professors heard this man talk on any subject whatsoever they’d probably return him to preschool.I swear to god, I’ve met thirteen-year-olds who are better educated and have more understanding of how stuff works than him.
And I’m a bit lost here, now. He takes the biological definition to define males and females. Then he jumps to defining sexuality. He gives definitions which are directly tied to sex. If infertile people aren’t male nor female, does that mean they have no sexuality?
This is where I’m finishing this video, I can’t bear to listen to this obnoxious man any longer.
So, to all you trans ladies and gentlemen out there, don’t listen to this giant manchild. Your gender and sexuality are valid, you are respected, you don’t deserve to listen to this sort of bullshit.
Sorry for this unnecessary rant, but it annoys me when a person with no actual understanding of a matter tries to lecture others about it.
#anti onision#onision#laineybot#its christmas here and im stuck with all of my family so this is how im venting
37 notes
·
View notes