#how do you not eventually just sort of internalize the layout of the keyboard?

[post-punk-revival]

I don't understand the "type _ with your eyes closed" challenges. Are you ALL exclusive phone users or were you just never taught to touch type?? I'm on a keyboard and I typed this whole post with my eyes closed. Just for fun.

[universalfanfic]

*tears streaming down my face*

I ... did it. ... I wrote something. There is relief in my soul. 

Here is my continuation of @gracieinanovel‘s Wedding Planner AU, because I love it and I needed to join in. :) 

Cora belongs to her, of course. 

Sutton froze over the table, fingers reaching, and Cora wasn’t sure if the woman had meant to try and flee the room or attempt strangling her. Her face was blooming the most vibrant red, and it appeared it took some effort to remove her tongue from the roof of her mouth. 

“Steve!” Sutton finally managed to squeak. “Hi. I’m- I’m good. You? I mean, how have you been?”

“Good. Good.”

Cora almost felt bad about springing this on her. Almost. But if Sutton had gone the entirety of her Paris trip without contacting Steve, then this was on her. She obviously needed a push. 

Steve still looked morose and longing as he shifted further into the room. It must have still been raining, because he looked just as wet as Cora did coming in. 

“Perhaps Steve would like a drink?” Cora prompted. 

Sutton jumped at the direction and opportunity to have something to do. 

“Right; of course! I have some coffee. Coffee good?” 

There was a coffee pot behind the counter; it was still half full and probably should be either poured out or drank before it burned. 

“Do you want a sweet too,” she called out over pouring a mug. “I have a new cupcake-” 

“Oh, just coffee is fine. Thank you.”

Steve rubbed his hand through his wet hair and pulled a chair over to their table. Sutton’s expression flickered before settling back on a forced smile. 

“Ok.” 

Cora internally groaned. 

Watching them interact was like watching two junior highers dance around each other. She’d thought after Steve’s confession things would move forward between them, but Sutton’s doubts about his sincerity and then her internship felt like it’d dragged them three steps back again. 

But there was time for the both of them later. Cora reorganized the paperwork she’d brought and brushed a lock of hair behind her ear. This was still a business meeting, after all.

They ought to get something done.

Sutton sat awkwardly between Steve and Cora, unable to scoot her chair away from him without being obvious, and she passed over his mug as she cleared her throat. 

“So, you probably know who the wedding is for.”

“I might,” he said. “But I might have also signed a non-disclosure.”

Both Cora and Sutton groaned in response. 

“I suppose that just leaves us to figure out the details,” Cora relented. “So, which rooms will we be using, and what are our times?”

They discussed timing and plans and room ambiance. The wedding ceremony was going to be held on the main balcony overlooking the bay, with plenty of twinkling lights and foliage covering the space. The reception would be held in the estates most lavish room, fondly referred to as The Fondue Room due to the high rental costs. 

Eventually, one of them yawned and they noticed the time. The rain had pittered to a spitting mist and the moon rose higher. Sutton collected their empty mugs while Cora collected her files.

“Well, that’s more progress,” she said, forced cheer in her voice. 

Steve and Sutton both nodded, sneaking a look at each other before turning away again quickly. 

“I guess we’ll see each other at the wedding.” Sutton glanced between the pair, rubbing nervously at her sore knuckles. “Unless Fury gives you a free moment before then,” she added hopefully, directed towards Cora.

“Oh, I wish, but I’m afraid I can’t count on it.” Cora smiled ruefully. “You know how Fury is, and with this wedding booked he’s been more frantic than usual. Obviously, because I’m here at this time of night.”

Sutton looked disappointed, but not surprised. 

“I’m telling you,” she said, “you have to start your own business. You’ve got the talent for it, and it’s probably the only way you’ll get your freedom.” 

Cora made a face and shrugged.

“I don’t know,” she said. “At the rate I’m working, anyway, it’d be impossible to find the time.” 

Steve cleared his throat and Sutton finally looked at him, shifting on her feet. 

“It, uh, was nice seeing you again too. Steve.” 

“Yeah. You’ll have to tell me about your trip sometime.” 

“Right, sure!”

Cora winced, but luckily the expression went unnoticed by the other two. She and Steve exited together and Sutton bid them both a goodnight, locking up before moving through the shop to prep for another early morning. 

The quiet night air settled around them and Steve let out a long sigh as he ran his hand through his hair again. 

“Well,” he said, “that… happened.” 

Cora placed a hand on his arm. 

“Hey, everything is going to work out.”

“Three months,” he said. “I just- is it because we-?”

“What? Went on one date?” Cora laughed lightly. “Steve, please. Sutton can just be a nervous person. She thinks-”

At her pause Steve looked over, his eyes prompting her to continue, and Cora shook her head. 

“You both will have to talk if you want this worked out. Now, I better get at least a couple hours of sleep before Fury decides to blow my phone up again. I’ll see you at the wedding.” 

Steve sighed and dug in his pocket for his keys. 

“Drive safe,” he said. 

He waited until Cora was in her car with the doors locked before he started up his own car. Their headlights disappeared into the night and the low lights in the bakery popped off shortly afterwards.

[]

The bell in the shop rung as Sutton pushed open the door to Banner’s Botanicals; the smell of soil and fragrant flowers were heady in the air. 

“I’ll be one moment!”

“Take your time, Bruce.”

A head of dark wavy hair popped up from behind a shelving unit holding some sort of flowering cacti, and Sutton reached her hand up to wave.

“Long time, no see. Not going to lie. I thought you were really done for good this time.”

Bruce Banner pushed around some nearby ferns as he made his way to the front of the shop. 

“Hey Sutton,” he said. “So did I. But apparently I can still be coerced.” 

He frowned at that, and Sutton suppressed a wry smile. Bruce could be stubborn, sure, but he was also a bit of a peacekeeper. It took quite a bit to actually get him to explode. 

“I’m guessing they at least weren’t asking for lil-” “Don’t.” He cut in sharply. “Don’t mention the lilies.”

Sutton held her hands up in surrender and chuckled. 

“Ok. But I would like to see what they did ask for. I’m supposed to incorporate some floral aspects into their cake.” 

He sent her a look before letting out a breath of air and waving her to follow him to the back of the shop. 

“You and Cora,” he said. “You know there’s a thing called email? You can attach pictures? Or maybe even use google?”

“Sure,” said Sutton. “But this gets us out of our offices for a bit. And anyway, isn’t technology just ruining face-to-face interactions?” 

Bruce rolled his eyes.

The further back in the shop, the more expensive the plants got. And for a man who’d sworn to only work with succulents from now on, he sure had a selection of flowers at his disposal. 

“The bride wanted whimsical but elegant,” he said. “And for once, there was even a list of suggestions to work from. We decided on white wisteria, some assorted peonies, and a few gardenias sprinkled throughout. And greenery, of course. I’m thinking mostly ferns. Probably some Israeli Ruscus.”

Sutton ooh-ed over the samples and took out her phone to get some pictures. His selection of plants were second-to-none. No doubt that was the reason this mystery couple chose him. And they certainly had some cash on them, because he was making an example bouquet as well. 

“Can I get a few small samples to take back? Are you still selling individual stems?”

“Do you have any samples?”

Bruce flashed her a cheeky grin and Sutton returned it. 

“All my friends are opportunists,” she lamented. Still, she pulled a small paper box out of her purse and taunted him with it. “I thought you might like some inspiration as well.” 

They exchanged goods, one looking a tad more excited than the other. Sutton sighed as she eyed the delicate petals and the complicated layering of the wisteria. 

“I might be ordering some of these from you. Their order expressly stated little to no fondant on the cake. And these?”

She made a tsk-ing sound against her teeth and shook her head. Bruce spared her a pitying glance until he looked back to his set of cupcakes, and grinned. 

“At least you know they have good taste. Fondant is gross.”

Sutton raised a stern pointer finger as she sucked in a breath.

“Ok, listen-” 

[]

Cora nibbled at her bottom lip as she used a spare, quiet moment to do some personal research. It wasn’t that this particular wedding was giving her an odd feeling, she’d worked a few weddings that had demanded discretion, but generally she could accurately guess who it was for. 

There wasn’t anything in the celebrity gossip tabloids that mentioned possible weddings coming up, no matter how thoroughly she looked. Boo. She supposed she’d just have to wait for the big day to find out the big secret. She pouted and drummed her fingers on her laptop as the digging stopped at a dead end. 

Her notebook was just to the left of her computer and she could see that name amongst the rest of her notes. 

Loki Laufeyson.

She still didn’t understand how one person could’ve garnered such a negative reaction out of Sutton, and so far she hadn’t had the opportunity to really pry into why. Cora cocked one eyebrow and tilted her head as her fingers danced over her keyboard.

Well, she still had a moment. Why not look?

His website was sleek and clean, with accents of dark green and gold adding a sense of wealth and elegance to the layout. He was the sort of wedding coordinator that you had to call to ask about his rates, which generally meant the average person shouldn’t even bother. 

From his gallery, it seemed he’d been involved in some high profile weddings and other various events. Cora hummed. There wasn’t anything that she could glean from his about page to give her any hints.

Even if he was wildly arrogant and obnoxious, Sutton probably would have just said he was a character, or annoying. 

“Are you sitting? At a time like this?”

Cora jumped at Fury’s voice as he swept into the room, camera bags and a tripod precariously cradled in his arms. 

“Do you know how many jobs we have to complete? There’s the party on the seventeenth, the charity event coming up, and that mo-”

“Yes,” Cora cut in. “The wedding, I know.” She hopped up and closed her notebook, gathering all her things and making herself busy. “I have everything under control, sir.”

Fury shot her a piercing look, which was always impressive given he only had one eye. 

“Under control isn’t good enough. This wedding could be what really launches this business into the public eye. Everything has to be perfect. Which is why you’re going to meet up with that Laufeyson and get all the details sorted out. Got it?”

Cora wanted to give him a flippant salute, but she still did need the paycheck. Instead, she grit her teeth behind closed lips and forced a smile. 

“Crystal clear, sir.” 

Well, perhaps she’d get some answers about this guy sooner than she thought.

[ethelbertpaul444-blog]

Apple’s Software Chief Details How iOS Apps Will Run on Macs

Near the end of yesterday’s WWDC theme, Craig Federighi, Apple’s elderly vice president of software engineering, to be recognised that beings have been asking for a long time whether Apple “wouldve been” merge the iPhone and Mac operating systems. His short answer? “No.” The word “No” appeared in giant white-hot letters on the enormou screen behind him. Within hours, screenshots of the “No” had colonized Twitter, some with memes attached. Except, that “No” should have had an asterisk after it, because while Apple still plans to ship two different operating systems–one for portable, one for desktop–the company has been working on generating iOS apps to Mac hardware. In an exclusive interview with WIRED, Federighi said the frameworks for porting iPhone and iPad apps to the Mac have been in development for two years. He revealed some of the technical details around how this will work, and shared some of the types of iOS apps he concludes make sense on the Mac. Federighi was also dismissive of touchscreen laptops–a make category that would seem like a natural addition to being able to Apple’s line once laptops begin running touch-first portable apps. Double Standard The point of this is not to create a single unified OS, Federighi said. But the fact that Apple spoke frankly about an initiative designed that could arrive as late as a year from now is a clear nod to how the tech monstrou sees the future of apps. It also says something about the health of the Mac’s App Store, which has tens of thousands of apps but remains dwarfed by the the mobile App Store, which boasts millions of apps. Behind the backgrounds, Apple has been building implements third-party developers can use to port their apps from iOS to MacOS with what Federighi claims will be minimal effort. At WWDC on Monday, Apple said some of its homegrown iOS apps, including Home, Stocks, News, and Voice Memos, expected to be available afterward this year on MacOS Mojave, the next explanation of MacOS. On the surface, it seems obvious that Apple might establish some of its own apps available across different platforms. But behind the scenes, Apple has been building tools third-party developers can eventually use to port their own apps from iOS to MacOS with what Federighi contends will be minimal effort. Apple began such an initiative around two summers ago, and its own internal software engineers ought to have beta testing the tools. These four iOS apps for Mac are the products of that testing. These struggles had been rumored before. Bloomberg reported at the end of last year that Apple was working on some kind of solution to let app makers build a single app that could run across both iOS and MacOS. But there were still a matter of how these multi-platform apps would be developed and how specific interactions would work; exploiting an iPhone touchscreen vary between exerting a mouse on on a Mac, for example. Native Tongues At a high level, Federighi describes what Apple is doing as fetching an iPhone software framework over to Mac and inducing it native to Mac, rather than employing some type of simulator or emulator. Both iOS and MacOS share a common kernel and have common initiates of frameworks for events like graphics, audio, and layout exhibition. But over go, each platform has derived differently. The most important and most well-known framework is UIKit, but that was built for iOS practice back at the start and wasn’t designed to address mouse and keyboard holds. With MacOS Mojave, UIKit will be updated. Just like developers are currently able to target an iPhone or an Apple TV as the design where their app will pass, they’ll soon be able to target the Mac as well. Even though the apps are being shared between operating system, Federighi emphasized that your Mac won’t start behaving like an iPhone. For app makers, some aspects of app porting will be automated and others will require additional coding. Squandering Xcode, Apple’s app-making software that runs on Macs, a developer will be able to indicate they want to write a variant of their iOS app for MacOS. Certain interaction UIs will happen automatically, like turning a long press on iOS into a two-finger click on a Mac. App makes may have to do some extra coding, though, around acts like menus and sidebars in apps, such as making a Mac app sidebar translucent or uttering share buttons a part of the toolbar. Even though the apps are effectively being shared between operating system, Federighi has been suggested that your Mac won’t start reacting like an iPhone. “It’s still MacOS, you still have the Terminal, you are able to append four monitors to it, you can still hook up external drives, ” he said. Not different kinds of portable app will clear practical sense on a Mac. You’re not going to gather up your Mac and walk down the street using action sensors to move your physical pleasure, for example. But Apple believes that countless competitions will easily be able to see the change; Federighi specifically mentioned Fortnite as a candidate for porting. He also said he could illustrate certain websites like IMDB, Yelp, or DirectTV having native desktop Mac apps. Of course, developers are able to stir these apps for MacOS now. It’s just more run, given the current toolset. And on the user feature, there would have to be some sort of value compute, whether it’s specific app aspects or even privacy concerns, for a person to want to download and hangout in a desktop app rather than speedily look up a eatery or a movie in the web browser. I asked Federighi whether the fact that iPhones and Macs run on different chip buildings would affect how the same app fees across both machines. “At this position , not so much, ” he said. “In a lot of our core APIs, happens like Metal, we’ve done the hard work over the years of procreating them roll well on both Mac and its affiliated CPUs and GPUs, and on iOS.” Touchy Subject When addressing my question of determining whether iOS apps moving to MacOS is a natural precursor to touchscreen Macs, Federighi told me he’s “not into touchscreens” on PCs and doesn’t apprehend he ever will be. “We genuinely feel that the ergonomics of using a Mac are that your hands are remained on a surface area, and that face-lift your weapon up to poke a screen is a reasonably fatiguing circumstance to do, ” he said. Federighi added that he doesn’t think the touchscreen laptops out there today–which he referred to as “experiments”–have been compelling. “I don’t think we’ve looked at any of the other guys to appointment and said, how fast is impossible to got to get? “( It’s worth noting that Microsoft’s Surface laptop, which has a touchscreen and is considered a top MacBook rival, has received primarily positive remembers .) Universal Future Speaking of race, Apple’s biggest adversaries in portable and desktop software are both once offering some version of portable apps that can run on laptops and desktops. Microsoft’s Universal Windows Platform, interposed back in 2016, causes makes write precisely one app and have it run across PCs, tablets, mobile phones, and the XBox One. That same year, Google said it was imparting the Google Play app accumulate to Chromebooks, which imply parties could download and use Android apps on their ChromeOS computers. Microsoft and Google have different technological approaches to loping similar or the same versions of apps across different devices. But both systems are an acknowledgement of a basic truth: While parties really adore portable apps, it can be inefficient and costly for developers to have to build perfectly disconnected apps for various platforms. Also, the concept of world-wide apps, or portable apps on PCs, have not been unilaterally embraced. Shortly after Microsoft announced UWP, one make spoke out against what he saw was an vigorous and overly controlling move on the part of Microsoft. Epic Activity cofounder Tim Sweeney wrote in an op-ed that the company was “effectively telling developers you can use these Windows boasts only if you submit to the switch of our locked-down UWP ecosystem.” There’s also the question of what world-wide apps means for income divides, since Apple gets a 30 percent piece of all income from apps sold in the App Store( or in the incidents of long-term due apps, 15 percentage ). Right now Mac developers can disperse their apps on the web and avoid Apple’s fee structure. Will developers have the same statu of self-restraint if they’re creating a MacOS app from an iOS app? Federighi was of the view that how an app is distributed and how much it costs will be followed by up to the developer. But again, all of this isn’t happening until next year, so there are a lot of details still to be shared, and likely much more conference in the best interests of desktop apps versus web apps. I queried Federighi when, exactly, third-party developers would get access to these tools. He declined to say. But when I asked if it would be reasonable to think that this is something we’d providing information about in a year–at WWDC 2019 — he responded: “That would be a reasonable thought to think.” More WWDC 2018 Coverage Here’s everything Apple announced at the WWDC 2018 theme Now Safari is the good privacy browser The best part of Apple’s keynote was all the stuff that wasn’t in it Apple’s regulations aren’t helping tech craving How one Apple programmer got apps talking to each other With a new software update, Apple’s HomePod starts wreaking more like it’s supposed to do now Fed up with Apple’s programmes, app makes formed a “union” Hungry for more? Sign up for the Gadget Lab newsletter for report and refreshes you can use http://dailybuzznetwork.com/index.php/2018/08/17/apples-software-chief-details-how-ios-apps-will-run-on-macs/

[ethelbertpaul444-blog]

Apple’s Software Chief Details How iOS Apps Will Run on Macs

Near the end of yesterday’s WWDC theme, Craig Federighi, Apple’s elderly vice president of software engineering, to be recognised that beings have been asking for a long time whether Apple “wouldve been” merge the iPhone and Mac operating systems. His short answer? “No.” The word “No” appeared in giant white-hot letters on the enormou screen behind him. Within hours, screenshots of the “No” had colonized Twitter, some with memes attached.

Except, that “No” should have had an asterisk after it, because while Apple still plans to ship two different operating systems–one for portable, one for desktop–the company has been working on generating iOS apps to Mac hardware. In an exclusive interview with WIRED, Federighi said the frameworks for porting iPhone and iPad apps to the Mac have been in development for two years. He revealed some of the technical details around how this will work, and shared some of the types of iOS apps he concludes make sense on the Mac. Federighi was also dismissive of touchscreen laptops–a make category that would seem like a natural addition to being able to Apple’s line once laptops begin running touch-first portable apps.

Double Standard

The point of this is not to create a single unified OS, Federighi said. But the fact that Apple spoke frankly about an initiative designed that could arrive as late as a year from now is a clear nod to how the tech monstrou sees the future of apps. It also says something about the health of the Mac’s App Store, which has tens of thousands of apps but remains dwarfed by the the mobile App Store, which boasts millions of apps.

Behind the backgrounds, Apple has been building implements third-party developers can use to port their apps from iOS to MacOS with what Federighi claims will be minimal effort.

At WWDC on Monday, Apple said some of its homegrown iOS apps, including Home, Stocks, News, and Voice Memos, expected to be available afterward this year on MacOS Mojave, the next explanation of MacOS. On the surface, it seems obvious that Apple might establish some of its own apps available across different platforms. But behind the scenes, Apple has been building tools third-party developers can eventually use to port their own apps from iOS to MacOS with what Federighi contends will be minimal effort. Apple began such an initiative around two summers ago, and its own internal software engineers ought to have beta testing the tools. These four iOS apps for Mac are the products of that testing.

These struggles had been rumored before. Bloomberg reported at the end of last year that Apple was working on some kind of solution to let app makers build a single app that could run across both iOS and MacOS. But there were still a matter of how these multi-platform apps would be developed and how specific interactions would work; exploiting an iPhone touchscreen vary between exerting a mouse on on a Mac, for example.

Native Tongues

At a high level, Federighi describes what Apple is doing as fetching an iPhone software framework over to Mac and inducing it native to Mac, rather than employing some type of simulator or emulator. Both iOS and MacOS share a common kernel and have common initiates of frameworks for events like graphics, audio, and layout exhibition. But over go, each platform has derived differently. The most important and most well-known framework is UIKit, but that was built for iOS practice back at the start and wasn’t designed to address mouse and keyboard holds. With MacOS Mojave, UIKit will be updated. Just like developers are currently able to target an iPhone or an Apple TV as the design where their app will pass, they’ll soon be able to target the Mac as well.

Even though the apps are being shared between operating system, Federighi emphasized that your Mac won’t start behaving like an iPhone.

For app makers, some aspects of app porting will be automated and others will require additional coding. Squandering Xcode, Apple’s app-making software that runs on Macs, a developer will be able to indicate they want to write a variant of their iOS app for MacOS. Certain interaction UIs will happen automatically, like turning a long press on iOS into a two-finger click on a Mac. App makes may have to do some extra coding, though, around acts like menus and sidebars in apps, such as making a Mac app sidebar translucent or uttering share buttons a part of the toolbar.

Even though the apps are effectively being shared between operating system, Federighi has been suggested that your Mac won’t start reacting like an iPhone. “It’s still MacOS, you still have the Terminal, you are able to append four monitors to it, you can still hook up external drives, ” he said.

Not different kinds of portable app will clear practical sense on a Mac. You’re not going to gather up your Mac and walk down the street using action sensors to move your physical pleasure, for example. But Apple believes that countless competitions will easily be able to see the change; Federighi specifically mentioned Fortnite as a candidate for porting. He also said he could illustrate certain websites like IMDB, Yelp, or DirectTV having native desktop Mac apps.

Of course, developers are able to stir these apps for MacOS now. It’s just more run, given the current toolset. And on the user feature, there would have to be some sort of value compute, whether it’s specific app aspects or even privacy concerns, for a person to want to download and hangout in a desktop app rather than speedily look up a eatery or a movie in the web browser.

I asked Federighi whether the fact that iPhones and Macs run on different chip buildings would affect how the same app fees across both machines. “At this position , not so much, ” he said. “In a lot of our core APIs, happens like Metal, we’ve done the hard work over the years of procreating them roll well on both Mac and its affiliated CPUs and GPUs, and on iOS.”

Touchy Subject

When addressing my question of determining whether iOS apps moving to MacOS is a natural precursor to touchscreen Macs, Federighi told me he’s “not into touchscreens” on PCs and doesn’t apprehend he ever will be. “We genuinely feel that the ergonomics of using a Mac are that your hands are remained on a surface area, and that face-lift your weapon up to poke a screen is a reasonably fatiguing circumstance to do, ” he said.

Federighi added that he doesn’t think the touchscreen laptops out there today–which he referred to as “experiments”–have been compelling. “I don’t think we’ve looked at any of the other guys to appointment and said, how fast is impossible to got to get? “( It’s worth noting that Microsoft’s Surface laptop, which has a touchscreen and is considered a top MacBook rival, has received primarily positive remembers .)

Universal Future

Speaking of race, Apple’s biggest adversaries in portable and desktop software are both once offering some version of portable apps that can run on laptops and desktops. Microsoft’s Universal Windows Platform, interposed back in 2016, causes makes write precisely one app and have it run across PCs, tablets, mobile phones, and the XBox One. That same year, Google said it was imparting the Google Play app accumulate to Chromebooks, which imply parties could download and use Android apps on their ChromeOS computers.

Microsoft and Google have different technological approaches to loping similar or the same versions of apps across different devices. But both systems are an acknowledgement of a basic truth: While parties really adore portable apps, it can be inefficient and costly for developers to have to build perfectly disconnected apps for various platforms.

Also, the concept of world-wide apps, or portable apps on PCs, have not been unilaterally embraced. Shortly after Microsoft announced UWP, one make spoke out against what he saw was an vigorous and overly controlling move on the part of Microsoft. Epic Activity cofounder Tim Sweeney wrote in an op-ed that the company was “effectively telling developers you can use these Windows boasts only if you submit to the switch of our locked-down UWP ecosystem.”

There’s also the question of what world-wide apps means for income divides, since Apple gets a 30 percent piece of all income from apps sold in the App Store( or in the incidents of long-term due apps, 15 percentage ). Right now Mac developers can disperse their apps on the web and avoid Apple’s fee structure. Will developers have the same statu of self-restraint if they’re creating a MacOS app from an iOS app?

Federighi was of the view that how an app is distributed and how much it costs will be followed by up to the developer.

But again, all of this isn’t happening until next year, so there are a lot of details still to be shared, and likely much more conference in the best interests of desktop apps versus web apps. I queried Federighi when, exactly, third-party developers would get access to these tools. He declined to say. But when I asked if it would be reasonable to think that this is something we’d providing information about in a year–at WWDC 2019 — he responded: “That would be a reasonable thought to think.”

More WWDC 2018 Coverage

Here’s everything Apple announced at the WWDC 2018 theme

Now Safari is the good privacy browser

The best part of Apple’s keynote was all the stuff that wasn’t in it

Apple’s regulations aren’t helping tech craving

How one Apple programmer got apps talking to each other

With a new software update, Apple’s HomePod starts wreaking more like it’s supposed to do now

Fed up with Apple’s programmes, app makes formed a “union”

Hungry for more? Sign up for the Gadget Lab newsletter for report and refreshes you can use