#honourable mention abu dhabi 2010 | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

thisdaynews · 5 years ago

Text

Brazilian GP: Max Verstappen wins thriller as Ferrari's Vettel and Leclerc collide

New Post has been published on https://thebiafrastar.com/brazilian-gp-max-verstappen-wins-thriller-as-ferraris-vettel-and-leclerc-collide/

Brazilian GP: Max Verstappen wins thriller as Ferrari's Vettel and Leclerc collide

Red Bull’s Max Verstappen passed Lewis Hamilton’s Mercedes twice to take a brilliant victory in a gripping Brazilian Grand Prix.

Behind him, the race developed into a dramatic finale as the Ferraris of Sebastian Vettel and Charles Leclerc collided while disputing fourth place.

Then, Hamilton collided with Red Bull’s Alexander Albon, and Toro Rosso’s Pierre Gasly held off the Mercedes for second place on the line.

It was a remarkable end to one of the most incident-packed races in recent memory. “What a race!” Verstappen said, summing it up perfectly. “Loved it.”

Hamilton took the blame for his crash with Albon and was penalised after the race by five seconds, demoting him to seventh – promoting Carlos Sainz to third for McLaren.

Verstappen was a deserved winner in a race that he controlled from the start, but Gasly was a star, Hamilton and Mercedes had an unusually difficult race, and yet again there will be a sharp focus on Vettel’s driving and character, as the four-time champion continued his battle for supremacy at Ferrari with his young team-mate.

Brazilian GP full race results

Verstappen wins thriller in Brazil – reaction

‘Verstappen wins a mad Brazilian Grand Prix’

After a rant over team radio, Vettel replays the collision in his head…

…kicks a stone…

…and the moment of realisation…

How a classic unfolded

Verstappen led away from the start, tracked by Hamilton, and Mercedes threw the first strategy dice with an early stop on lap 20, attempting to use the fresh pace of new tyres to pass the Red Bull.

It looked like it had worked when Verstappen, already touch and go as to whether he would keep the lead when he made his stop on the next lap, was held up by Robert Kubica’s Williams on his way out of the pits, for which Williams were penalised.

That gifted Hamilton the lead, but Verstappen was determined to win it straight back.

Hamilton caught Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc on his first lap after his stop and passed him into the final corner, but now Verstappen was right on his tail and, with his battery depleted after his fast lap, Hamilton was defenceless as the Dutchman swept around the outside into Turn One.

Verstappen and Hamilton gave the passionate Brazilian crowd a race to remember

That looked to be it, until Hamilton’s team-mate Valtteri Bottas retired with an engine problem on lap 53, bringing out the safety car.

Hamilton was told do the opposite to Verstappen as they approached the pit entry and when the Red Bull pitted, Hamilton stayed out.

But he immediately doubted the decision, worrying that his used medium tyres would be no match for the virtually new softs on Verstappen’s car.

And when the race restarted on lap 60, with 11 to go, Hamilton was proved right and Verstappen swept past him into the lead – again around the outside of Turn One – despite Hamilton’s best efforts to trick him at the re-start.

That was the battle for the lead done, but it was just the start of a frenetic final 10 laps…

Oh no, what do Ferrari do now?

Hamilton was now struggling at the head of a train of four cars, comprising Albon, who had brilliantly passed Vettel at the re-start, Vettel and Leclerc, all on fresher soft tyres.

The tension built, as Vettel first tried and failed to re-pass Albon, and then Leclerc, on the freshest tyres of all, pressured his team-mate.

With five laps to go, Leclerc pulled a stunning move on Vettel into Turn One to take fourth place. But Vettel refused to back off and came back at his team-mate.

Leclerc moved left on the back straight on the run to Turn Four, leaving Vettel just enough room on the outside.

But in scenes reminiscent of his collision with Red Bull team-mate Mark Webber back in Turkey in 2010, Vettel edged across and the cars collided.

The impact immediately broke Leclerc’s front suspension and gave Vettel a rear puncture, and both were forced out of the race.

“What was he doing,” Vettel said over team radio, before perhaps accepting his error and saying: “Sorry.”

“What the hell?” Leclerc screamed.

The incident will surely have repercussions at Ferrari, where team boss Mattia Binotto has struggled to contain his warring drivers all season as Leclerc has threatened Vettel’s seniority in the team.

What was Hamilton doing?

The collision brought out the safety car again and Mercedes decided to pit Hamilton for a fresh set of tyres so he could attack in the closing laps.

The race re-started with only two laps to go, with Hamilton running fourth behind Albon, and Red Bull on for a one-two, and Gasly.

He was straight past Gasly at Turn One but made a too-ambitious move on Albon at Bico De Pato and the two collided, sending Albon into a spin and damaging Hamilton’s front wing.

‘Come on, guys!’ Hamilton feels heat in Brazil

Hamilton said of the incident with Albon: “The gap was there but it was completely my fault”

“The gap was kind of there but it closed right at the end, clearly my fault,” Hamilton said, as officials announced the incident would be investigated after the race.

Gasly passed both in the incident and Hamilton set off after the Toro Rosso again as they entered the final lap. The Mercedes was right with Gasly into the final corner and pulled alongside on the exit, but Gasly was able to edge ahead as they approached the line to take the best result of his career and a deserving reward for superlative performances since being dropped from Red Bull to Toro Rosso in favour of Albon in the summer.

Behind Sainz were the Alfa Romeos of Kimi Raikkonen and Antonio Giovinazzi, ahead of Renault’s Daniel Ricciardo.

Sainz’s podium was confirmed after he was cleared following an investigation for illegal use of the DRS overtaking aid while passing yellow caution flags.

It is McLaren’s first podium since the 2014 Australian Grand Prix, 118 races ago.

Driver of the day

This has to go to Verstappen after a dominant performance and as big a statement as he could have made against Hamilton in the developing rivalry. But Gasly deserves an honourable mention for a brilliant performance of his own, completely out-classing team-mate Daniil Kvyat, as he has since rejoining Toro Rosso

What happens next?

The final race of the season in Abu Dhabi. For all the glamour and the lights, it’s an antiseptic track that seems unlikely to offer the riches of Brazil. But there have been so many great races this season, despite Hamilton’s dominant title win, who would dare say there won’t be another?

What they said

Max Verstappen:“Lewis was very quick so I had to keep pushing and all the time. He pitted early so we had to be on top of our pit stops we had a good move on him. I could control the race with the tyres I had it was unbelievable it was a lot of fun out there and great to win the race.”

Pierre Gasly:“This is my first podium in F1 and for sure I will never forget it, it’s such a special moment – so emotional. Toro Rosso have given me such a fantastic car since I’ve come back. It’s an amazing day.”

Lewis Hamilton:“Max did a great job – he was very fair the way he positioned the car. Massive apologies to Albon. The gap was there but it was completely my fault. They did a fantastic job, they outperformed us on the straights – he raced my heart out and took a lot of risks today, as you could see.”

The Brazilian GP is Gasly’s best ever result in his 46th Formula 1 race

Thousands of fans flock to Sao Paulo for the grand prix each year

History repeating: At the Turkish Grand Prix 2010 Vettel and then team-mate Mark Webber touched wheels and spun off

#collide #Leclerc

0 notes

sporadicwinnersong · 7 years ago

Text

What is India’s “Cold Start” military doctrine?#MohnishAhluwaliaNotes

Why is the chief of the army talking about its deterrence measures after years of official denials? LAST week India celebrated its 68th Republic Day, the highlight of which is an elaborate parade to show off India’s military might (pictured). Soldiers goose-stepped and tanks rolled down Rajpath, New Delhi’s main ceremonial thoroughfare, as India's president, Pranab Mukherjee, and this year’s guest of honour, Abu Dhabi’s Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al Nahyan, looked on. Fighter jets screeched overhead. The annual display was particularly pointed this year, coming barely three weeks after Bipin Rawat, India’s new army chief, acknowledged in an interview the existence of the country’s “Cold Start” military doctrine. What is Cold Start and why did General Rawat, who took office on December 31st, mention it in public? Cold Start is the name given to a limited-war strategy designed to seize Pakistani territory swiftly without, in theory, risking a nuclear conflict. It has its roots in an attack on India’s parliament in 2001, which was carried out by terrorist groups allegedly used as proxies by Pakistan’s powerful intelligence services (ISI). India’s response to the onslaught was a flop: by the time its lumbering Strike Corps were mobilised and positioned on the frontier, Pakistan had already bulked up its defences, raising both the costs of incursion and the risk that it would escalate into a nuclear conflict. Cold Start is an attempt to draw lessons from this: having nimbler, integrated units stationed closer to the border would allow India to inflict significant harm before international powers demanded a ceasefire; by pursuing narrow aims, it would also deny Pakistan a justification for triggering a nuclear strike. Yet India has refused to own up to the existence of the doctrine since it was first publicly discussed in 2004. Nor was its rumoured existence enough to stop Pakistani terrorists from launching devastating attacks in Mumbai in 2008, killing 164 people. One reason for India to keep its cards close to its chest is that it may not be capable of acting on Cold Start. Indeed, India’s army chief admitted to civilian leaders after the 2008 attacks that his battalions were “not ready for war” with Pakistan. It probably did not help that India’s political leaders never signed off on it either, as a leaked diplomatic cable from 2010 suggested. Yet things have taken a different turn since an assault last September on the Indian garrison of Uri in Kashmir, which left 19 dead. In a departure from India’s traditionally defensive posture, the government responded by authorising “surgical strikes” along the frontier, targeted at “terrorist launchpads” and “those protecting them”. By acknowledging the doctrine, which would demand a more potent retaliation than these commando operations, the army seems keen to signal that it has a range of strategic options, introducing an element of unpredictability in its response. Political leaders may have also come closer to embracing it. The government of Narendra Modi has shown keen interest in national-security matters, moving India into the world's top-five defence spenders, addressing servicemen’s grievances and mulling a wholesale revamp of the armed forces’ structure. Whether the strategy will prove effective remains to be seen. By pursuing Cold Start, the army may have reaped “the worst of both worlds”, says Walter Ladwig, a scholar at King’s College London. Should it come after a terrorist attack prepared with the ISI’s knowledge, India’s response would lack the element of surprise. That makes Cold Start a dubious deterrent. And Mr Rawat’s recognition of the doctrine’s existence provides further reason for Pakistan to develop “tactical” nukes—tiny warheads that could easily end up in inexpert or malevolent hands. The risk of overreaction on Pakistan’s side is heightened by India’s continued obfuscation about what exactly the concept means, making the whole premise seem misguided. Indeed, Pakistani officials have already threatened to use nuclear weapons, should India put Cold Start into action. In conventional war, confusing an enemy can lead to victory; when two nuclear powers are involved it is a surer step towards a disastrous draw.

via Blogger http://ift.tt/2DNM3Oc

0 notes