#high DAPA websites | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

backlink12312 · 8 months ago

Text

Unlocking the Power of High DAPA Backlink Websites in 2024!

In the ever-evolving landscape of search engine optimization (SEO), the quest for high-quality backlinks remains paramount. And when it comes to backlinks, high Domain Authority/Page Authority (DAPA) websites hold immense value. Let's delve into the intricacies of leveraging these authoritative platforms to skyrocket your online presence.

Understanding the Essence of High DAPA Backlink Websites

Before we embark on this journey, let's grasp the significance of DAPA. Domain Authority and Page Authority are metrics developed by Moz, indicating the credibility and relevance of a website in search engine rankings. A higher DAPA score signifies a greater potential to influence search visibility.

The Quest for Quality Backlinks: Why DAPA Matters

DAPA serves as a crucial indicator of a website's trustworthiness and influence in the digital realm. Acquiring backlinks from high DAPA sites signals to search engines that your content is endorsed by reputable sources, thereby bolstering your website's credibility and enhancing its chances of ranking higher in search results.

Strategically Obtaining Backlinks from High DAPA Websites

Craft Compelling Content: The cornerstone of any successful backlink acquisition strategy is compelling content. Create valuable, informative, and engaging content that naturally attracts attention and prompts high DAPA websites to link back to your site.

Forge Meaningful Relationships: Building rapport with influencers and webmasters in your niche can pave the way for backlink opportunities. Establish genuine connections, offer value, and demonstrate why your content deserves to be shared on their high DAPA platforms.

Guest Blogging on Authority Sites: Contributing guest posts to reputable websites within your industry not only exposes your brand to a wider audience but also provides valuable backlinks from high DAPA sources. Ensure that your guest posts are well-researched, insightful, and aligned with the host site's audience and guidelines.

Utilize Broken Link Building: Identify broken links on high DAPA websites that relate to your content. Reach out to the site owners, offer your content as a replacement, and seize the opportunity to secure valuable backlinks while helping them maintain a seamless user experience.

Maximizing the Impact of High DAPA Backlinks

Securing backlinks from high DAPA websites is only the first step; optimizing their impact is equally crucial. Here's how you can make the most of these invaluable endorsements:

Optimize Anchor Text: Ensure that the anchor text used for your backlinks is relevant, descriptive, and incorporates targeted keywords. This not only enhances the relevance of the link but also reinforces the topical authority of your content.

Monitor and Maintain Backlink Quality: Regularly audit your backlink profile to identify any low-quality or toxic links that may harm your site's SEO efforts. Disavow harmful links and focus on nurturing relationships with high DAPA websites for sustained organic growth.

Diversify Your Backlink Portfolio: While high DAPA backlinks are undeniably valuable, a diverse backlink profile comprising a mix of authority, relevance, and naturalness is essential for long-term SEO success. Aim for a balanced blend of backlinks from various sources to ensure resilience against algorithmic changes.

Conclusion

In the realm of SEO, harnessing the potential of high DAPA backlink websites can propel your website to new heights of visibility and authority. By strategically acquiring and optimizing backlinks from these authoritative sources, you can establish your brand as a trusted voice in your industry and outshine the competition in search engine rankings. Embrace the power of high DAPA backlinks and embark on a journey towards digital supremacy.

#high DAPA websites #Best backlink websites #backlinks #best the backlink list 2024 #backlings

0 notes

entrustclinicalresearch · 10 months ago

Text

Unleash the Magic of High DA/PA Links for Maximum Online Impact!

Having a robust online presence is non-negotiable. And guess what? We’ve cracked the code to unlock unparalleled growth! Picture this: Your website, commanding authority, and visibility, drawing in waves of eager visitors. How? Through the transformative power of High Domain Authority (DA) and Page Authority (PA) links.

Check High DA/PA websites:- https://beatseowithus.blogspot.com/2024/02/unleash-magic-of-high-dapa-links-for.html

#seo #backlinks #marketing

0 notes

ankitakumaree · 4 years ago

Text

Question and answer sites

Apart from Quora, there are many websites where you can take [Dofollow Backlink] by answering the question. Out of that, these are 13 websites,

you can answer the question in every website here. And you can also share your question in these website. All these websites have high DAPA, these websites can bring huge amount of traffic to your website. Apart from this,

(1) answers.yahoo.com(2) Coursera.community(3) www.answerbag.com(4) Wegnam.in(5) Answer.com(6) Anybodyoutthere.com(7) Funadvice.com(8) Askmehelpdesk.com(9) Theanswerbank.co.uk(10) Askdeb.com(11) Inside.com(12) Answerly.com(13) Twitter.com

you can take [Dofollow backlink] by commenting from our website. [VISIT]

#blogging #blogger #Traffic building #organic traffic #backlinks #wordpress

0 notes

myattorneyusa · 5 years ago

Photo

Justice Gorsuch Weighs In Against Universal Injunctions in Public Charge Case

Introduction

On January 27, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States stayed a universal injunction entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) against the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS's) new public charge rule. The Supreme Court's decision will allow the Government to implement its new public charge rule in every state except Illinois, where the rule is enjoined statewide.

We discuss the practical effect of the order for those who may be subject to the public charge ground of inadmissibility in a separate post [see blog]. In this post, we will briefly examine an interesting concurring opinion authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch, and joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, inveighing against the increasing tendency of district court judges to enter universal injunctions, preventing the Government from implementing a policy nationwide.

You may read the Court's order and Justice Gorsuch's concurring opinion here [PDF version].

The Concurring Opinion

Five of the nine Justices of the Supreme Court — John Roberts, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh — voted to grant the Government's motion to stay the injunction against the implementation of the public charge rule. We will be discussing a concurring opinion authored by Justice Gorsuch and joined by Justice Thomas explaining their reasoning for voting to grant the Government's motion.

Justice Gorsuch began by noting that plaintiffs bringing suit against the public charge rule “urged courts to enjoin the rule's enforcement not only as it applies to them, or even to some definable group having something to do with their claimed injury, but as it applies to anyone.” That is, they sought not only relief for themselves, but also to prevent the Government from imposing the rule anywhere. Justice Gorsuch traced the history of the various court challenges. District courts in California, Washington, and Maryland imposed universal injunctions, only to have the injunctions stayed by appellate courts. Meanwhile, the Second Circuit ruled against the Government's motion to stay the SDNY injunction, which was the instant issue before the Supreme Court. The United States District Court for the Northern Illinois enjoined the rule only in Illinois. Regarding the various injunctions and subsequent litigation, Justice Gorsuch wrote: ��If all of this is confusing, don't worry, because none of it matters much at this point.”

Justice Gorsuch proceeded to criticize the universal injunctions that had been entered against the public charge rule, describing the SDNY injunction as “a single judge in New York enjoin[ing] the government from applying the new [public charge] definition to anyone, without regard to geography or participation in this or any other lawsuit.” Speaking more broadly, Justice Gorsuch wrote: “The real problem here is the increasingly common practice of trial courts ordering relief that transcends the cases before them. Whether framed as injunctions of 'nationwide,' 'universal,' or 'cosmic' scope, these orders share the same basic flaw-they direct how the defendant must act toward persons who are not parties to the case.” He further explained why he views universal injunctions as being flawed: “Equitable remedies, like remedies in general, are meant to redress the injuries sustained by a particular plaintiff in a particular lawsuit.” He went further, stating that when a district court goes beyond granting relief to the parties before it to granting relief “to those who are strangers to the suit,” it becomes “hard to see how the court could still be acting in the judicial role of resolving cases and controversies.” Justice Gorsuch suggested that universal injunctions may be suspect under the scope of the judiciary's powers under Article III of the U.S. Constitution.

Justice Gorsuch opined that “[i]t has become increasingly apparent that this Court must, at some point, confront these important objections to this increasingly widespread practice” of district courts granting universal injunctions — noting with citation to Justice Thomas's concurrence in Trump v. Hawaii [see next section] that universal injunctions have become increasingly common in recent years. He stated that the current situation “is patently unworkable, sowing chaos for litigants, the government, courts, and all those affected by these conflicting decisions.” Justice Gorsuch explained that the current situation leads to litigants “leaping from one emergency stay application to the next” rather than taking the time to develop arguments regarding a particular case. This allows “little opportunity for the adversarial testing of evidence.” While limiting the geographic scope of relief leads to uncertainty as well, Justice Gorsuch found this preferable because it “encourages multiple judges and multiple circuits to weigh in only after careful deliberation, a process that aids this Court's own decision -making process.”

Justice Gorsuch next addressed what is commonly called “forum shopping: “There are currently more than 1,000 active and senior district court judges, sitting across 94 judicial districts, and subject to review in 12 regional courts of appeal. Because plaintiffs generally are not bound by adverse decisions in cases to which they were not a party, there is a nearly boundless opportunity to shop for a friendly forum to secure a win nationwide.” In short, Justice Gorsuch is noting that in the event plaintiffs lose in one district court, there is no adverse consequence for other individuals nationwide who challenge the same government policy in other district courts. But, when universal injunctions are in play, a single set of plaintiffs before one of the 94 Federal district courts may secure a win that blocks the policy in question nationwide, including in districts where other plaintiffs may have already lost in advancing the same claim. The effect, Justice Gorsuch explained, is that “the government's hope of implementing any new policy could face the long odds of a straight sweep, parlaying a 94-to-0 win in the district courts into a 12-to-0 win in the courts of appeal.”

For these reasons, Justice Gorsuch, joined by Justice Thomas, expressed his hope that the Court would review the issue in an appropriate case.

A Broader View

Justice Thomas, who joined Justice Gorsuch's concurrence, wrote similarly critically about universal injunctions in his concurring opinion in Trump v. Hawaii, the case in which the Supreme Court upheld President Donald Trump's restrictions on entry for nationals of certain countries, colloquially known as the “travel ban.” We discuss Justice Thomas's concurring opinion in Trump v. Hawaii on site [see blog]. Although Justice Gorsuch, like Justice Thomas, voted with the majority in Trump v. Hawaii, he did not join Justice Thomas's concurring opinion. In the instant concurrence, Justice Gorsuch not only articulated similar views to Justice Thomas in Trump v. Hawaii, he cited to Justice Thomas's concurrence several times. At a minimum, the opinion indicates that at least two Justices on the Supreme Court are highly concerned about the increasing use of district court universal injunctions.

The use of universal injunctions has increased dramatically during the Trump Administration — including against several high-profile immigration-related policies such as the “travel ban” [see article] and the Administration's ongoing efforts to end DACA [see article]. Universal injunctions did not begin during the Trump Administration, however — President Barack Obama's DAPA policy was enjoined universally by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied the Government's motion to lift the injunction, and the Fifth Circuit's decision was later affirmed by an equally divided Supreme Court [see article]. DAPA never took effect and was ultimately rescinded by the Trump Administration [see article].

The universal injunction issue is significant in the immigration context because litigants against administration immigration policies often seek them in certain district courts to block policies from being implemented anywhere in the United States. Thus, any move to curtail the use of universal injunctions by the Supreme Court could have a profound effect on litigation against federal immigration policies, and federal policies more broadly.

Please visit the nyc immigration lawyers website for further information. The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC focuses vast segment of its practice on immigration law. This steadfast dedication has resulted in thousands of immigrants throughout the United States.

Lawyer website: http://myattorneyusa.com

#immigration #immigrants #US immigration

0 notes

seotorank-blog · 5 years ago

Text

Create High Quality Do Follow Backlinks From High DA-PA Website | Increase Your Website Traffic

Namskar dosto aaj ki video mei bataya hai ki aap kaise high quality dofollow backlink bana sakte hai woh bhi high authority website se with DA 90 Score Site aur apne website ki DA PA increase kar sakte hai taaki aapki site google ke 1st page par rank kare aur organic traffic aapko mile meine full explained kiya hai ki iska kya benefits hoga to video jaroor dekhe bhaut helpful hai ummed hai mujhe…

View On WordPress

#backlink building #Backlinks #Create #DAPA #Follow #High #Increase #Quality #Traffic #Website

0 notes

foodforyourbody · 5 years ago

Link

via RSS feed - SEOCheckOut Rank Your Website 10x Faster With Our High-Quality Manual Link Building Service At An Affordable Price! *|*| SALE ON FOR A LIMITED TIME|*|*I bought 5 packages and I'm surprised about the quality. It's insanely cheap. The service is FAR better than the price suggests! I've already seen rank improvements.Do you waste your time finding an SEO service that does not promise what they say? How many times have you had to disavow some links whilst watching your money go down the drain? We have been offering this service private to our clients across the world since 2017. We are now able to accept more workload thanks to our quality service and repeat business from our clients. Allowing you to take advantage. Introducing: Apex SEO ServicesThis is a high-quality off-page link building service that I know you'll see positive results. We cannot guarantee anything, that would be unethical, but from our past clients -- we have seen strong positive movements. Service Breakdown: PBNs Are Hosted On Different A,B Class IPs.PBNs Have High DAPA, 15+ TF,CF And 35-40+ Ref. Domain Average.High-Quality Web 2.0 With Handwritten Unique Article And About, Privacy Page And 1 Relevant Image And Video With Unique Design.We Use 3 Level Link Building Strategy To Boost Your Tier 1 And Money Site.We Only Use High Authority Sites For Link Building (Web 2.0, Pdf, Doc, Social Bookmark, Profile).We Provide Full Link Report With Login Details Of Web 2.0, Pdf, Doc, Social Bookmark, Profile.Note: We Use 1x 500 Words Unique Handwritten Article In Web 2.0, On PBN And PDF We Use Spun Copyscape Pass Unique Article. The Secret Sauce Behind Our Success: Level 1: 1 PBN Link (15+TF,CF).1 Web 2.0 With Handwritten Unique Article.1 High Authority PDF Or Doc Link.1 High Authority Social Bookmark.1 High Authority Profile Link. Level 2: 40+ Contextual LinksPlatforms- Articles, Wikis, Web 2.0’s.Note: We Don’t Build Links For PBN Link. Level 3: 400+ LinksPlatforms - Blog Comments, Forum, Guestbook, Image Comments, Micro Blogs, Trackback, Url Shorteners. Note: We Don’t Build Links For PBN Link. F.A.QCan I Order More Than One Package? Yes. We commonly complete services for 5-10x packages. What Niches Do You Accept? Yes. All niches, except no adult, pharmacy, casino related websites. When Will I Receive My Report? Yes. It will depend on your order quantity - but we expect to get things done within 3 days. How Many URLs And Anchors Can I Use? Yes. You can use 1 URL & 1 Anchor PER PACKAGE. However, if you order more than one package, we can include 2-3 Anchors Per URL. Do You Have A Refund Policy? Yes, 100% Refund Is Available UNLESS the order has STARTED. If the order has been started, the refund cannot be provided. Are All Levels Created Manually? Only Level 1 is manually done. Level 2 and 3 is automated. I'm sure you'd agree with me that this is a reasonable package that will kick start any SEO campaign at rock-bottom pricing. If the services make sense in principle, I'm sure you'd give it a go, right? So let's kick start your website, give it the much-needed boost and work together to get you to the top of Google in the near future. Why not start on one package as a trial, see how we do? When you are satisfied, you can order as much as you want . To your success in Google. *|*| SALE ON FOR A LIMITED TIME|*|* by: HocoDigital Created: -- Category: Link Building Viewed: 46

https://ift.tt/2KZrUcP

#IFTTT #RSS feed - SEOCheckOut

0 notes

courtneytincher · 6 years ago

Text

South Korea resumes Black Panther tank production after a two-year delay

The Korean automotive industrial giant Hyundai Rotem has announced that has restarted K2 Black Panther main battle tank production at the company’s facility in Changwon (Gyeongsangnam-do) after a two-year delay following transmission issues.

According to a news release, on 27 May was held an official ceremony of start production of K2 tanks of the second series at a facility in Changwon.

Two first K2 tanks in new advanced version already have descended from the conveyor of a factory and will be transferred to the Korean Army. Hyundai Rotem is expected to provide the South Korean military over 100 tanks by 2021.

The second batch of K2 serial tanks of 106 units, ordered by Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) as an option to the contract of December 29, 2014, received the engine and transmission units of their own South Korean development and production, including the new diesel engine Doosan Infracore DV27K with a capacity of 1500 hp. and an S & T Dynamics EST15K automatic transmission (has six forward speeds and three reverse speeds).

The company’s website said the Main Battle Tanks and Family Vehicles developed by Hyundai Rotem Company feature the optimal combat capabilities as a leader in a ground weapon system.

The K2 MBT is a tank based around a brand-new concept with combat efficiency maximized through digital-based ergonomic designs suited for the 21st-century technical combat environment. It features dramatically strengthened firepower due to an extended turret gun and new shells. Plus, it features high mobility and maneuverability through a small powerpack and its advanced suspension and navigation system.

The survivability of the K2 MBT has been reinforced with armored plates made of new material and a new protection system, while its 3D battlefield control capability has been enhanced with the Vetronics system and the combat command and control system. Furthermore, the K2 MBT incorporates advanced intellectualization of its various control systems, most notably including its newest fire control system.

from Defence Blog

According to a news release, on 27 May was held an official ceremony of start production of K2 tanks of the second series at a facility in Changwon.

The company’s website said the Main Battle Tanks and Family Vehicles developed by Hyundai Rotem Company feature the optimal combat capabilities as a leader in a ground weapon system.

via IFTTT

#Defence Blog

0 notes

maxwellyjordan · 6 years ago

Text

Argument preview: Requiring notice and comment under the Medicare statute

The intricacies of the Medicare program will be on display at the Supreme Court next week, in a case challenging a major Department of Health and Human Services payment determination issued without notice-and-comment procedures. The case has administrative law mavens tuned in as well, as it may have broader implications for the still unresolved but critical question of when agencies in general may act without such procedures.

Medicare, the massive federal health insurance program for the elderly and disabled, relies on private contractors to administer its reimbursements to providers. This case involves one particular type of payment, the “Disproportionate Share Hospital” (DSH) payment, which adjusts the reimbursement rates for hospitals that treat a high percentage of low-income patients. These payments are crucial to the fiscal survival of hospitals in low-income areas and the financial stakes are high: The government has estimated that the DSH payments for fiscal years 2005 to 2013 alone totaled $3 to $4 billion.

At issue is whether, under the relevant provisions of the Medicare Act, 42 U.S.C. §§1395hh(a)(2) & (a)(4), HHS was permitted to change the DSH calculation formula without notice-and-comment rulemaking. HHS argues that the statute does not require those procedures and that doing so would cripple the Medicare program, requiring the agency to use rulemaking for any change in its lengthy and detailed operations manuals. On the other side, the hospital respondents — as well as all five amicus briefs — contend that the language of the statute expressly requires notice and comment and that these public-regarding procedures are critical given the stakes of any changes.

The case has drawn interest from outside the Medicare context because it has the potential to touch on an extremely important and unresolved area of administrative law: where to draw the line between “interpretive rules,” which the Administrative Procedure Act exempts from notice and comment, and “substantive rules,” for which those procedures are normally required. As we have detailed elsewhere, much important agency action in recent years has occurred without notice and comment, and the Supreme Court has not yet waded into these controversial waters. Here, HHS asks the court to dip a toe in, claiming that the APA’s exception for interpretive rules applies to its DSH payment change and that Congress never intended the Medicare Act to have stricter procedural requirements than the APA.

In the opinion below, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit did not rule on the APA question because it found that the Medicare Act did not actually incorporate the APA’s interpretive-rule exception. The Supreme Court therefore presumably will not address the broader issue. But in answering the Medicare question, the court still may provide guidance on the larger administrative law morass as to what constitutes a proper interpretive rule.

The specific details require some understanding of two of Medicare’s various parts. Part A of the law pays hospitals for services to covered individuals. The statute requires the calculation of the DSH payments to be based on a formula that approximates the fraction of low-income Medicare patients the hospital cared for in a particular year. As relevant here, under the act, part of the calculation turns on the number of patients “entitled to benefits under part A.” This became tricky when, in 1997, Congress added an alternative to the Medicare program, Medicare Part C, which allows individuals the option to choose government-subsidized enrollment in private insurance plans instead of traditional Medicare.

The issue in this case is that the government wants to include Part C beneficiaries in the Medicare fraction as relevant to the DSH calculation because these beneficiaries are “entitled to benefits under Part A” even if they choose otherwise. Although the wisdom of the policy is not before the court, hospitals dispute this construction and fear it will cause their payments to decline significantly because the hospitals believe Part C beneficiaries are wealthier, on average, than Part A beneficiaries.

The case has a tortured procedural history. In brief, HHS did not change its DSH calculation immediately after Part C’s enactment in 1997. But in 2004, CMS, the arm of HHS responsible for administering Medicare, did finalize a rule, after notice and comment, placing Part C beneficiaries in the Medicare fraction of the DSH formula. The D.C. Circuit invalidated that rule on procedural grounds in 2014, holding in Allina Health Services v. Sebelius that the final rule was not a “logical outgrowth” of the proposed rule. Following that decision, HHS used a different method to reach the same result for fiscal year 2012. Specifically, it issued the relevant formula, which included the Part C beneficiaries, in a spreadsheet on its website.

Shortly after the decision affecting FY 2012, HHS did a new notice-and-comment rulemaking for payments for future years; that rulemaking is also currently under challenge in the D.C. Circuit (those proceedings have been stayed pending the Allina decision), but it is not at issue before the court in this case. Right now, the Supreme Court is considering only the FY 2012 decision, which the challengers assert is invalid because it was made without prior notice and comment.

In the proceedings below, the district court ruled for the government, but was reversed by the D.C. Circuit in a unanimous opinion by then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh’s involvement means that only eight justices will decide this case, because Kavanaugh is recused. (A tie would affirm the D.C. Circuit, but would have no precedential weight.)

The D.C. Circuit’s opinion was an exercise in basic statutory interpretation. It focused on the text of the Medicare Act, and its explicit differences from the APA. Most importantly, whereas the APA contains an exception from notice and comment for interpretive rules, the court found Medicare to be different: It requires notice and comment for any “rule, requirement, or other statement of policy … that establishes or changes a substantive legal standard governing the scope of benefits, the payment for services, or the eligibility of individuals, entities, or organizations to furnish or receive services or benefits.”

The D.C. Circuit held that the DSH decision met all of these criteria. Finding that the new formula is a “requirement” in that it “command[s]” the fiscal intermediaries with respect to their calculations, the court also held that the new formula “represents a change” from prior practice. In addition, the court concluded that the phrase “‘substantive legal standard,’ at a minimum, includes a standard that creates, defines, and regulates the rights, duties, and powers of parties” and that the DSH calculation “define[s] the scope of hospitals’ legal rights to payment.”

The D.C. Circuit acknowledged that it was “breaking with several other courts of appeals” in holding that Congress did not incorporate the APA’s interpretive-rule exception to notice-and-comment requirements into the Medicare Act. At least three other circuits have suggested that Congress did not intend the Medicare Act to have more stringent requirements than the APA. Regardless, the D.C. Circuit held that “even if HHS were correct that the Medicare Act somehow incorporated the APA’s notice-and-comment exception for interpretive rules,” “another provision of the Medicare Act,” Section 1395hh(a)(4) — which requires rulemaking for changes that are not the “logical outgrowth” of prior positions — “expressly required notice and comment in this case.”

The government’s arguments center more on administrative law implications than statutory interpretation. Specifically, the government focuses on two open questions about the definition of an interpretive rule. First, it looks to whom the new DSH formula binds. Arguing that the formula is not a rule or requirement for medical providers but rather binds only lower-level contractors working for the agency, the government contends that the formula therefore is not a binding rule under the normal understanding of that term. Notably, the government’s argument echoes the argument by amici (including one of us) in United States v. Texas — the 2016 challenge to the Department of Homeland Security’s Deferred Action for Parents of Americans program under President Barack Obama — about whether DAPA was sufficiently binding as to require notice and comment before implementation. The Supreme Court did not decide that issue in the DAPA case, and it remains an important administrative law question with which the court has not meaningfully engaged, so many will be scouring the decision in this case for clues.

Second, the government homes in on what it means to “interpret,” another open question with respect to what constitutes an interpretive rule under the APA. The government argues that HHS is not changing any law, but simply is interpreting an already existing provision in the Medicare statute — namely, what it means to be “entitled to benefits under part A.”

Finally, the government hammers on the consequences of a decision in favor of the hospitals, claiming that “the court of appeals’ rationale, if taken to its logical conclusion, would subject nearly all of CMS’s nonbinding manuals and interpretive materials to the notice-and-comment process,” grinding Medicare administration to a halt.

The respondent hospitals’ arguments largely track those of the D.C. Circuit. The hospitals also focus on the differences between the Medicare Act and the APA. For instance, whereas the APA expressly excludes policy statements from notice and comment, Medicare expressly includes “statement[s] of policy” in Section 1395hh(a)(2). To buttress their argument that Congress’ departures from the APA were intentional, the hospitals point out that Medicare does indeed explicitly follow the APA in exempting good-cause rules from notice and comment. Kavanaugh likewise focused on this difference. As he put it: “Congress knew how to incorporate the APA’s notice-and-comment exceptions into the Medicare Act when it wanted to,” and so “[w]e must respect Congress’s use of different language and its establishment of different notice-and-comment requirements in the Medicare Act and the APA.”

As to the parade of horribles, the hospitals contend that their position will not open up the full Medicare manuals to notice and comment. One data point here is Clarion Health West, LLC v. Hargan, a D.C. Circuit case that followed that court’s decision in Allina (Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson sat on both panels.). In Clarion, recognizing that drawing the line between interpretive and legislative rules is “fuzzy,” the D.C. Circuit held that a different reimbursement change to a Medicare manual did not need notice and comment under either Medicare or the APA, because the challenged instructions “constitute[d] a policy statement” that did “not create or amend a substantive legal standard—they have no binding legal effect.”

The hospitals also note, as did the D.C. Circuit, that Section 1395hh(a)(4) provides an alternative ground for requiring notice and comment. Finally, both sides in Allina attempt to argue that the complex legislative history of Section 1395hh supports their argument.

In the end, unless the Supreme Court is willing to read the Medicare Act as indistinguishable from the APA, Allina seems an unattractive vehicle for the court to make its first statement on what kinds of interpretive moves by agencies are exempt from notice and comment. But whatever the court says on these matters is sure to be parsed by APA experts. And even if the court carefully confines its decision to Medicare, the case still will have enormous fiscal and administrative implications for our largest national insurance program.

The post Argument preview: Requiring notice and comment under the Medicare statute appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

from Law http://www.scotusblog.com/2019/01/argument-preview-requiring-notice-and-comment-under-the-medicare-statute/ via http://www.rssmix.com/

#law #justice

0 notes

datalogoan-blog · 6 years ago

Link

do 100 dofollow backlinks low obl high dapa tfcf ★This service is outstanding for all fiverr buyers because we will Submit your website on 100 High Quality High Domain Authority blogs and you will see guaranteed Great serp for your website on Search engines★ ✔ YES OFFERING GUARANTEED RESULT ON YOUR RANKINGS OR FULL REFUND ✔ THESE BACKLINKS ARE 100% SAFE FROM PENGUIN,PANDA & HUMMINGBIRD ✔ WE ARE ALWAYS UP TO DATE WITH LATEST GOOGLE UPDATES ✔Also will complete your order with Different IPs So no footprint and SAFEST Gig Key Features: All Highpr Actual Pages. Manuall Work. 100% Dofollow Link. Not Use Any Automated Software. 100% Penguin Panda safe. 100% Approval Rate. Satisfaction Guaranteed. After completion i provide full detail with Excel report.

#seo #lowobl #highdapa #blogcomments

0 notes

addictionfreedom · 7 years ago

Text

Dual Diagnosis Treatment Centers In Houston Texas

Contents

Dual diagnosis rehab

Partial day treatment

Treatment (persons with co-occurring mental and

And homes after

99m Tc-EC-G, invented at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and acquired by Cell>Point, is a target …

Patient diagnosis is also enhanced … serves southeast Texas and the greater Houston community. Memorial Hermann’s 14 hospitals include three hospitals in the Texas Medical Center, two long-term care facilities, three heart institute …

Vyripharm has advised us as follows: It is a biopharmaceutical company with a goal of improving clinical management …

Drug Addiction Treatment Houston Tx : The Best Rehabs for 2018. Get Discounts at Best Rehab Centers! … Dual Diagnosis Treatment Centers In Alaska;

… Hermann PaRC is the number one substance abuse treatment center in Houston. … winning history of treating alcoholism, drug addiction and dual diagnosis.

A dual diagnosis is best treated by a dual-diagnosis treatment center. If you or someone you love has questions concerning dual diagnosis, call us at …

Houston, Texas drug and alcohol addiction treatment and drug rehab centers. Locate Houston alcohol and drug treatment centers and alcohol rehab centers in …

33 Houston, TX Dual Diagnosis Drug Rehab – Best Dual Diagnosis Treatment Centers in Houston Texas

Our Houston drug and alcohol rehab center offers licensed clinical services such as detox, IOP, supportive outpatient treatment, and aftercare, which are …

Doctors tend to rank cancers by the likelihood a patient will be alive five years after treatment. That’s the magic … For its part, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston funds its testing almost entirely with donations.

Learn about dual diagnosis addiction treatment and understand signs of addiction, mental illness and how they effect each other at Willow Springs Recovery.

33 Dual Diagnosis /Co-Occurring Disorder Programs in Houston TX. Directory of Co-Occurring Disorder Programs in Houston TX. Search all Co-Occurring …

In the 15 patients in the study, the dual treatment controlled tumors in 93 percent … of investigational cancer therapeutics at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. "To date, tumors in 93 percent of patients with clear …

Jan 15, 2013 … Best Dual Diagnosis Treatment Centers. We have goats at Best Dual Diagnosis Treatment Centers in Texas.;. Many who suffer from …

Exercise increased caution in Colombia due to crime and terrorism. Some areas have increased risk. Read the entire Travel Advisory. Several departments throughout the country due to crime and terrorism. Violent crime, such as …

The parasites typically live in the intestines of dogs, cats and other wild animals, according to the US Centers for Disease … last week after receiving the diagnosis. The condition typically goes away without treatment, but antiparasitic …

Dual diagnosis, non 12-Step rehab. We’re a very different program, find out why!

We’re Here To Help. Call Now For Immediate Placement Opportunities.

Addiction & Dual Diagnosis; Gender-Separate Treatment; … The Right Step family of alcohol and drug rehab treatment centers for … The Right Step Houston Houston, TX.

At Alo House Recovery Center, we have created the highest quality dual diagnosis rehab treatment program in the United States with Masters level clinicians.

Suboxone Treatment Mobile Al Contents All the featured substance Highest … mobile Subutex and suboxone for opioid Drug addiction centers that banned them Find mobile drug rehab treatment A list of Suboxone (buprenorphine) prescribers and treatment programs in Alabama. Each listing includes contact information (address, phone number, website). In Alabama … on the medication-assisted treatment program and whether you

work-study programs, dual-disorder education, etc. We are most fortunate to have a number of facilities in our area that offer treatment and recovery efforts for those afflicted with mental illness…the Tropical Texas Behavioral Health, the …

Dual diagnosis treatment addresses both addiction and any co-occurring mental illness. Treating both at the same time is vital. Find out why: 855-258-4282.

Luna Recovery Services is a Houston based intensive outpatient drug rehab. That provides high quality treatment to people looking to recover from addiction.

(221) Dual Diagnosis Drug Rehab in Texas. Find Dual Diagnosis Treatment Centers in TX and Nationwide. Most Advanced Dual Diagnosis Treatment Centers in the World.

DAPA in Houston, Texas offers dual diagnosis and, substance abuse treatment, drug rehab, alcohol treatment centers, addiction recovery, and psychiatric service

Find Dual Diagnosis Treatment Centers in Harris County, Texas, get help from Harris County Dual … Transcend Texas – Houston Sober Living, Treatment Center.

Right Step has recovery centers all over the state of Texas. They are all good facilities, but the standout is Galleria alcohol and drug rehab in Houston. … Known for mental health counseling, dual diagnosis and treatment is available as …

In total, Samsung paid £6.1million in bribes to the German company and a winter sports center, the judges said … The …

Substance Abuse Treatment Center and Mental Health Facility helping Houston, Texas Hurricane Harvey victims with Detox … the two scholarships comprise of dual-diagnosis substance abuse addiction treatment with a range of …

Generally, inpatient treatment begins with a 28-30 day program, but it’s individualized and can last two or three times that long depending on the nature of the addiction or other issues being addressed. Some patients are treated for a dual …

Houston, TX, alcohol and drug detoxification centers (clinics).

An immunotherapy treatment combining the IDO1 inhibitor epacadostat … Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. "This is the first report of IDO1 inhibition in combination with PD-L1 …

Get help finding Dual Diagnosis Alcohol and Drug Rehab Centers in Houston, TX that are unique to your individual needs. Addiction treatment professionals are …

Mental Health Treatments Centers: New Dimensions is a partial day treatment and intensive outpatient program that provides mental health and chemical dependency treatment for adolescents, adults and their families. … Houston, TX 77058 … Adult Dual Diagnosis Programs · Adult Chemical Dependency Programs …

Nanoparticle-based imaging plays a crucial role in cancer diagnosis and treatment. Here, we discuss the modalities … design has been discussed by Cheng et al. recently 42. The dual theranostic functionality may ensure that the …

Find Dual Diagnosis Treatment Centers in Humble, Harris County, Texas, get help from Humble Dual Diagnosis Rehab for Dual Diagnosis Treatment in Humble, get help with Co-Occurring Disorders in Humble.

The amount of illicit drugs seized in Texas, especially in areas like Houston that are …. Treatment of a dual diagnosis incorporates an integrated method which …

Find Dual Diagnosis Treatment Centers in Houston, Harris County, Texas, get help from Houston Dual Diagnosis Rehab for Dual Diagnosis Treatment in Houston, get help with Co-Occurring Disorders in Houston.

The Watershed Addiction Treatment Programs have treated over 55,000 people suffering from alcoholism and other drug addictions since 1998, Our JCAHO accredited in-patient facilities in Florida and Texas offer full medical detoxification for opiates, heroin, alcohol and other addictive substances.

33 Dual Diagnosis /Co-Occurring Disorder Programs in Houston TX. Directory of Co-Occurring Disorder Programs in Houston TX. Search all Co-Occurring Disorder Programs in Houston.

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children’s Cancer Center, and the Center for Cell and Gene Therapy at Baylor, Texas Children’s Hospital and Houston Methodist are investigating a new treatment … 24.5 months from diagnosis.

Find Drug Rehabs for Dual Diagnosis Clients in Houston Texas

The idea is that somehow, this is a “dual hit” where one melatonin-reducing factor compounds the other, resulting in an even greater elevated risk of breast cancer than either risk factor alone. Although the team also looked for a clear …

Addiction Treatment Drug Rehab Contents The rehab center also The center. explaining The last thing lizabeth ms Mental health services administration's (samhsa's) national Inpatient drug and alcohol rehab For people willing Drug rehabilitation is the processes of medical or psychotherapeutic … For individuals addicted to prescription drugs, treatments tend to be similar to those who are addicted to drugs

Unique Treatment Experience, Holistic and Non-12 Step. No Medicare. Call 24/7.

Dual Diagnosis Treatment Centers. A dual diagnosis refers to an individual who is suffering … Most dual-diagnosis treatment centers offer inpatient … Houston, TX …

Get help finding Alcohol and Drug Rehab Centers in Houston, TX that are unique … Dual diagnosis treatment (persons with co-occurring mental and substance …

Approach to Dual Diagnosis. At Burning Tree, … also like to return to their respective communities and homes after completing our drug rehab center in Texas.

Rehab centers for substance abuse and mental illness are available. Get help finding the best dual diagnosis treatment center and rehab program by calling us today and start on the path to recovery today.

Crystal Meth Treatments Contents Marsh said she had Even though drug users Guidance has suffer from addiction and Duties ryan has been and Approaching a loved one who is going through a crystal meth addiction can feel like … Crystal Meth Treatment – Explore treatment options and professional care for addiction [ Crystal Meth Treatment ] !!! NORRISTOWN >> Addiction Treatment Counselor Contents And job duties Ryan has been And addiction often Cocaine addict tony marini now Southeastern … first Rehab Counselor – Find the Best Drug and Alcohol Rehab Centers ! Drug rehabilitation is the processes of medical or psychotherapeutic treatment for dependency …. Traditional addiction treatment is based primarily on counseling. Counselors help individuals identifying

The post Dual Diagnosis Treatment Centers In Houston Texas appeared first on Freedom From Addiction II.

0 notes

legaleaseus · 7 years ago

Text

What is the Dream Act of 2017?

AILA Video on Dream Act of 2017 In the latest edition of AILA Quicktake, American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) Digital Media Manager, Ellie Rutledge Silver, interviews AILA Director of Government Relations Greg Chen on why the Dream Act of 2017 is important. What is the Dream Act of 2017? The Dream Act of 2017 ("Act"), introduced by Senators Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) and Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), will grant conditional permanent resident status for certain long-term residents who entered the United States as children, in response to a move by a group of state Attorney Generals who have threatened to sue the Trump Administration if DACA isn't ended by September 5, 2017. Who is eligible? The law will cancel the removal and grant lawful permanent resident status (green card) on a conditional basis to an undocumented person or DACA recipient who:

has been continuously physically present in the U.S. for 4 years preceding the date of enactment;

was 17 years old or younger on the initial date of entry into the U.S.;

is not inadmissible on the following grounds: criminal, security and terrorism, smuggling, student visa abuse, ineligibility for citizenship, polygamy, international child abduction, or unlawful voting;

has not participated in persecution;

has not been convicted of: any federal or state offense punishable by a term of imprisonment of more than 1 year (other than a state offense for which an essential element is the person’s immigration status), or 3 or more federal or state offenses (other than state offenses for which an essential element is the alien’s immigration status) for which the person was convicted on different dates and imprisoned for an aggregate of 90 days or more; and

has been admitted to an institution of higher education, or has graduated from high school or obtained a GED or a high school equivalency diploma, or is enrolled in secondary school or in an education program assisting students in obtaining a high school diploma or in passing a GED or equivalent exam.

Bill Highlights

Inadmissibility bars may be waived for humanitarian purposes, family unity, or if the waiver is otherwise in the public interest.

Biometrics capture, background checks and medical examination will be undertaken to determine whether there is any criminal, national security, or other factor that would render the person ineligible for the conditional green card.

For children enrolled in school who are at least 5 years old and who would be eligible for relief under the Act, removal shall be stayed. The stay can be lifted if the person ceases to meet eligibility requirements.

There is no numerical limitation on the number of people who may be granted permanent resident status on a conditional basis under the Act.

Conditional permanent residency under the Act is valid for 8 years.

Special Hardship Exception for a person with disability or a full-time caregiver of a minor child; or the person’s removal from the U.S. would cause extreme hardship to the person or the person’s U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident spouse, parent, or child.

Stay tuned for updates on this quickly developing issue. If you are affected by this development or have questions about immigration and the green card process, please contact us. We are here to help. Follow us on Instagram, Twitter, Facebook or LinkedIn for up-to-date immigration news.