#gold makers mark fm

[fiifiadinkra]

Thousands of people took part in 'Ark FM Health Walk & Mini Clinic'

Thousands of people took part in ‘Ark FM Health Walk & Mini Clinic’

“Walking is simple, free and of the easiest ways to get more active, lose weight and healthier. It’s underrated as a form of exercise, but walking is ideally for people of all ages and fitness level to be more active.”

One of the biggest radio stations in Brong Ahafo Region of Ghana, Ark FM on Saturday September 21, 2019 held its 4th Edition of the biggest health and fitness walk “Ark FM Health…

[itsworn]

Graveyard Gold with Mark Worman

Mark Worman here. The Undertaker, The Dream Maker, The Love Taker, don’t you mess around with me. Wait, I think that last moniker may harbor the vaguest hint of plagiarism. Yes, my legal team is advising me to cease and desist using that title.

OK, OK, so I ripped off Pat Benatar, so what? “It doesn’t matter who said them first, I am passing my wisdom on to you …” said Sir David Brent. All right, fine, I admit I don’t write all of my material, I may have borrowed a few lines from TV and movies, so what? Robert W. Thompson may have been credited with first inventing the tire, John Boyd Dunlop, the second, but you don’t need their names on a tire to carry you to safety, do ya?

I think now would be a great time to take the off-ramp from that slippery highway and get back to all things cars. And I’d like to start by sharing my thoughts with current and future readers of Mopar Muscle.

I admit that my articles are usually based on my highly subjective expertise (read: opinion), at least when it comes to what made this or that car great; or why this or that happened, when there’s no factual explanation available and that’s OK. I keep to the facts where there are facts to quote, and I gladly share my experience with all when it comes to the restoration of Chrysler muscle cars. But when it comes to opinions, well, that’s all they are, my opinions. So while some of you may disagree about what features on a Mopar most sear their indelible carbon tracks on your hearts, remember it’s all subject to one’s personal predilections.

I will quote from the brilliant Paul Simon now, “When I think back on all the crap I learned in high school, it’s a wonder I can think at all. And though my lack of education hasn’t hurt me none, I can see the writing on the wall.” Opening lyrics from the July 7th, 1973 #2 Billboard hit song, “Kodachrome.” While I’m not his biggest fan in the world, I sure do recognize raw talent and appreciate thought-provoking lyrics. In fact, the chorus of the same song, is what this installment of “Beyond the Grave” is about.

“Kodachrome … They give us those nice bright colors, they give us the greens of summers, makes you think all the world’s a sunny day.” Just swap out “Kodachrome” for “Mopar” and read along as I share my opinion on the old proverb, “All that glitters is not gold.”

In 1970, Dodge and Plymouth threw their collective hats in the ponycar ring — big time. The design cues of the ’70 Barracuda and Challenger revolutionized what a ponycar, a muscle car, should be and would be for generations to come. No question that even today, nearly 50 years later, they stand as two of the most seductive and stylish body designs in automotive history. However, the mindful and creative team of designers at Ma Mopar, weren’t finished — not by a mile.

Styling is one thing, engines and drivetrains, sales options, pricing, well that’s all part of the ride, pun intended. Color — vibrant, prepossessing color — that’s what Mopar may be best known for during the late ’60s and early ’70s. But as I said, “All that glitters is not gold.” Yeah, I know, I stole that one too.

Graveyard Cars just finished one of its most beautiful restorations. That’s saying a lot, considering some of the formidable contenders from our past. I’m sure many of you reading this have witnessed our restorations of some of the most valuable and rare Mopar muscle cars on the planet — like a 1971 ’Cuda 440+6, four-speed, Shaker Hood in EV2 Tor Red or a ’69 Daytona, one of only 503 ever made. Recently, we brought back a 1970 Coronet R/T, 426 Hemi, convertible, four-speed — one of only two made and the only one left in existence. Not to belabor the point, but the list goes on and on. Nonetheless, this stunning example of the famed ponycar, will melt your heart and satiate your senses.

Let’s break this gem down by the numbers and remember, a Body Code Plate, aka Fender Tag, is read left to right and bottom to top:

V5X Y05 26 EN2 N42 N85 N88 P31 R35 C55 G33 H51 M21 M31 N41 V1X A01 A62 B51 C16 C26 FF4 HRX0 000 A28 060716 E86 D32 JS29 U0B 173369

E86 440 1-4BBL HP D32 A727 3-SPD A/Trans JS29 CHALLENGER R/T SPECIAL EDITION U/0/B 440 1–4BBL 1970 MODEL YEAR HAMTRAMCK MI. 173369 SERIAL NUMBER FF4 LIGHT GREEN METALLIC HRX9 LEATHER BUCKET SEATS (BLACK) 000 FULL DOOR PANELS A28 SCHEDULED PRODUCTION DATE (OCTOBER 28) 060716 VEHICLE ORDER NUMBER V1X FULL VINYL ROOF (BLACK) A01 LIGHT PACKAGE A62 RALLYE INSTRUMENT CLUSTER (W/8K TACH) B51 POWER FRONT DISC BRAKES C16 CENTER CONSOLE C26 CONSOLETTE W/FORMED HEADLINING C55 BUCKET SEATS (FRONT) G33 LH O/S MIRROR REM/CHR/RAC H51 AIR CONDITIONING W/FRONT HEATER M21 DRIP RAIL MOLDINGS M31 BODY BELT MOLDINGS N41 DUAL EXHAUST SYSTEM N42 BRIGHT EXHAUST TIPS N88 AUTO SPEED CONTROL P31 POWER WINDOWS R35 RADIO-AM/FM-MX-STEREO (10W) V5X MOLDINGS-PROTECTIVE BODY SIDE Y05 BUILD TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR : U.S.A ORDER 26 26” RADIATOR EN2 END OF SALES CODE (2ND LINE)

  So, as you can see, this Challenger isn’t only rare, it’s also a beautiful balance of both muscle and luxury. Fortunately, it was a very complete car to start with, but that’s not to say it was without its hidden sins. We had to replace front inner fenders, front floors, rear step wells, under seat pan, trunk floor, trunk floor extensions, quarter-panels, and multiple patches due to Midwest rust.

In the end, we were able to save much of the original interior, chrome, and trim. With the options this car has, it’s a dream to drive. Air conditioning, power windows, speed control, and all the time you’re riding on rich Corinthian leather. OK, maybe not Corinthian, but it’s leather. Sorry, I was channeling Ricardo for a moment.

Now returned 100 percent to its original, assembly line condition, this car is ready to give its owner another 50 years of fun and stake its claim as Graveyard Gold, without the glitter.

The post Graveyard Gold with Mark Worman appeared first on Hot Rod Network.

from Hot Rod Network https://www.hotrod.com/articles/graveyard-gold-mark-worman/ via IFTTT

[stellatateblog]

Adjusting calories when bulking or cutting

This topic was inspired by a combination of this thread from POB and the generic "add/drop 500 cals" advice I see across the boards. We’re going to dig into data for bulking followed by cutting and, hopefully, give some more practical recommendations to help us do things a bit more accurately. Bulking

The caloric surplus you calculate vs the caloric surplus actually in play can be vastly different predominantly due to the wild inter-individual differences in NEAT (non-exercise activity thermogenesis). NEAT refers to unconscious physical activity such as fidgeting, maintaining posture, etc – stuff you don’t really think about doing but are actually doing.

To truly understand how large the inter-individual differences can be when it comes to NEAT, we’ll be focused on this classic study. – They took non-obese, 25-36yr old adults and fed them a 1,000 calorie surplus for 8 weeks. No training or exercise protocol needed. – Body comp was measured via DXA & energy expenditure (EE) via doubly labeled water. Both gold standard methods. – The results of this surplus:

Mean Range Baseline weight (kg) 65.8 53.3-91.7 Overfed weight (kg) 70.5 58.8-93.1 Weight gain (kg) 4.7 1.4-7.2 Fat gain (cals/day) 389 58-687 Fat-free mass gain (cals/day) 43 15-78 Baseline dietary intake (cals/day) 2824 2265-3785 Baseline resting energy expenditure (REE) 1693 1479-1990 Overfed REE 1772 1460-2040 Baseline thermic effect of food (TEF) (cals/day) 218 89-414 Overfed thermic effect of food 354 133-483 Baseline total EE 2807 2216-3818 Overfed TEE 3361 2508-4601

Most would’ve predicted that a 1000cal/day surplus should lead to a weight gain of 2lbs per week. So, for a total of 8 weeks, we should expect a total weight gain of 16lbs. Right? Well, in this carefully controlled study, only 4.7kg (10.34lbs) was gained on average. That means most would’ve over predicted the weight gain by 54.7%. That’s a big miscalculation.

Worth noting, of that 1,000cal surplus, only 432cals were stored & 521cals burnt off. Two-thirds of the latter through NEAT – the key difference maker. The range of NEAT increase was a huge variable (100-700cals/day) and explains why we have some folks who are "hard gainers". If you’re eating 1,000 cals more but also, unconsciously , burning off 692 of those cals then…that "calculated" surplus isn’t really what you thought it was.

Summary

So, how much of a caloric surplus is needed for bulking? Answer: it depends. For some folks, a 200-300cal increase will be plenty. For others, you may need to go 700-800. And for a select few, such as the person in the study who only gained 1.4kg (3.1lbs), 1000+ might be required. Trial & error is necessary. I’d advice starting on the lower-mid range (depending on how susceptible yo are to fat gain) and adjusting from there based on results.

How much weight gain to aim for? Here you go: – For natural beginners I honestly wouldn’t focus too much on how much to gain as long as you’re gaining. Focus on progression in the gym and dieting fundamentals (protein intake, etc) and leave the rest for later down the road. – For non-newbie naturals an average gain of 2-3lbs/month is PLENTY. For women in the same category, go 1.5-2.5lbs/month. – For enhanced lifters you can easily justify going to 5-8lbs/month for guys, 4-5lbs/month for women. Obviously it will depend on dosages, how comfortable you are with stretch marks, etc, etc but even at this rate I don’t see fat gain being a real issue.

Cutting This section will build off some of the stuff from this thread with regards to the metabolic adaptations that occur when dieting that make the "calculated" weight loss inaccurate. In other words, you lose less than you expected with NEAT playing a big part again. So, how much less and why?

Does metabolic compensation explain the majority of less-than-expected weight loss in obese adults during a short-term severe diet and exercise intervention? (PM for full paper) OBJECTIVE: We investigated to what extent changes in metabolic rate and composition of weight loss explained the less-than-expected weight loss in obese men and women during a diet-plus-exercise intervention. DESIGN: In all, 16 obese men and women (41 ± 9 years; body mass index (BMI) 39 ± 6 kg m(-2)) were investigated in energy balance before, after and twice during a 12-week very-low-energy diet(565-650 kcal per day) plus exercise (aerobic plus resistance training) intervention. The relative energy deficit (EDef) from baseline requirements was severe (74%-87%). Body composition was measured by deuterium dilution and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, and resting metabolic rate (RMR) was measured by indirect calorimetry. Fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) were converted into energy equivalents using constants 9.45 kcal per g FM and 1.13 kcal per g FFM. Predicted weight loss was calculated from the EDef using the ‘7700 kcal kg(-1) rule’. RESULTS: Changes in weight (-18.6 ± 5.0 kg), FM (-15.5 ± 4.3 kg) and FFM (-3.1 ± 1.9 kg) did not differ between genders. Measured weight loss was on average 67% of the predicted value, but ranged from 39% to 94%. Relative EDef was correlated with the decrease in RMR (R=0.70, P<0.01), and the decrease in RMR correlated with the difference between actual and expected weight loss (R=0.51, P<0.01). Changes in metabolic rate explained on average 67% of the less-than-expected weight loss, and variability in the proportion of weight lost as FM accounted for a further 5%. On average, after adjustment for changes in metabolic rate and body composition of weight lost, actual weight loss reached 90% of the predicted values. CONCLUSION: Although weight loss was 33% lower than predicted at baseline from standard energy equivalents, the majority of this differential was explained by physiological variables. Although lower-than-expected weight loss is often attributed to incomplete adherence to prescribed interventions, the influence of baseline calculation errors and metabolic downregulation should not be discounted. Brief comments on the methodology

– At 565-650cals/day, all from lean meat & veggies, we’re talking about a crash diet. – Protein intake was too low for both sexes (0.94g/kg for men, 0.9g/kg for women) and really needed to be at least 1.5g/kg in this context. – Not all meals were lab provided, which makes compliance issues (not doing what you were told) likely. Especially on a crash diet where we knowing bingeing is more likely.

– On the plus side, these folks did undertake 4 cardio sessions & 2 lifting sessions per week. Cardio started at 30 mins per session and gradually built up to 60mins. Lifting involved full body work (shoulder press, chest press, lat pull downs, leg press, bench, squats, upright rows & ab stuff) starting at 60%1RM and working up to 80%1RM across 2 sets to begin with before moving on to 3 sets per movement. Results & discussion

metabolic table.jpg

The main discovery was that weight loss was 33% less than predicted. Here’s why: – Resting metabolic rate (RMR) went down by 228cals/day (11%) & diet induced thermogenesis (DIT), which was only predicted not actually measured, went down by 236cals/day. That’s a total of 464cals/day explaining 60% of the less than expected weight loss. – 30% of the remaining discrepancy is explained by the fact that less lean mass was lost than predicted. The calculation predicted 79% fat, 21% LBM loss but LBM loss was actually only 18.8% (3-3.1kg out of a total weight loss of 16.1-16.3kg). That’s 90% of the difference between predicted & real weight loss explained. – The last 10% can be explained by lack of compliance by the subjects. Happens all the time and more likely with a study design like this.

Why am I telling you all of this? To show that predicted weight loss becomes incredibly inaccurate once you’re deep into your cut. It’s important to be aware of that and know how to react. Some metabolic adaptations are inevitable and easily explained. RMR drops because you now weigh less = less energy needed to maintain lower body weight. DIT drops because you’ve been consuming less food = less energy needed for digestion. Adaptive thermogenesis is the wild card, not directly measured in this paper.

Adaptive thermogenesis is responsible for the wildly varied drop in energy expenditure due primarily to a drop in NEAT. This drop can be anywhere from 10-27% depending on a myriad of factors (how long you’ve been dieting, how you’ve been dieting, activity levels, bf% change, etc). Some of this is avoidable – do not go batshit crazy with the cardio, do not have batshit crazy macros and do lift some real weight to keep your muscles.

Summary

So, we now know why predicting weight loss in inaccurate. What can we do about it? – Give yourself 15-25% leeway when it comes to caloric intake. Be flexible. That means being prepared to drop it by that extra amount as you get deeper into dieting. I generically recommend starting with a 20% deficit to see weekly results and rolling on from there. – Drugs will help reduce the impact of all of this. Not completely but more than good enough.

Dealing with women specifically: – You girls tend to have lower energy requirements than men and that may cause problems down the line. A typical smaller female may need 1800-2000cals to maintain. 20% deficit knocks that down to 1450-1600cals. 15-25% leeway knocks that down to an average of 1150-1300 cals. This is why women are more susceptible to eating disorders and health issues when dieting. – Health issues are coming once fat intake gets too low. Thyroid will absolutely crash if calories get too low. It’s difficult to track progress over a short timeframe due to the menstrual cycle impact on water retention. My point – taking extreme action can get you girls into big trouble really quickly.

My advice:

– Cardio, not taken to excess, will help tremendously. Do not rely on diet alone. – Diet breaks are your best friend – use them frequently. – Do not be afraid to reach out to someone who knows what the **** they’re doing. Prevention is so much easier than treatment in this situation.

Attached Images

metabolic table.jpg (59.5 KB)

Adjusting calories when bulking or cutting syndicated from https://ugbodybuildingblog.wordpress.com/

[ugbodybuilding]

Adjusting calories when bulking or cutting

This topic was inspired by a combination of this thread from POB and the generic "add/drop 500 cals" advice I see across the boards. We're going to dig into data for bulking followed by cutting and, hopefully, give some more practical recommendations to help us do things a bit more accurately. Bulking The caloric surplus you calculate vs the caloric surplus actually in play can be vastly different predominantly due to the wild inter-individual differences in NEAT (non-exercise activity thermogenesis). NEAT refers to unconscious physical activity such as fidgeting, maintaining posture, etc - stuff you don't really think about doing but are actually doing. To truly understand how large the inter-individual differences can be when it comes to NEAT, we'll be focused on this classic study. - They took non-obese, 25-36yr old adults and fed them a 1,000 calorie surplus for 8 weeks. No training or exercise protocol needed. - Body comp was measured via DXA & energy expenditure (EE) via doubly labeled water. Both gold standard methods. - The results of this surplus:

Mean Range Baseline weight (kg) 65.8 53.3-91.7 Overfed weight (kg) 70.5 58.8-93.1 Weight gain (kg) 4.7 1.4-7.2 Fat gain (cals/day) 389 58-687 Fat-free mass gain (cals/day) 43 15-78 Baseline dietary intake (cals/day) 2824 2265-3785 Baseline resting energy expenditure (REE) 1693 1479-1990 Overfed REE 1772 1460-2040 Baseline thermic effect of food (TEF) (cals/day) 218 89-414 Overfed thermic effect of food 354 133-483 Baseline total EE 2807 2216-3818 Overfed TEE 3361 2508-4601

Most would've predicted that a 1000cal/day surplus should lead to a weight gain of 2lbs per week. So, for a total of 8 weeks, we should expect a total weight gain of 16lbs. Right? Well, in this carefully controlled study, only 4.7kg (10.34lbs) was gained on average. That means most would've over predicted the weight gain by 54.7%. That's a big miscalculation. Worth noting, of that 1,000cal surplus, only 432cals were stored & 521cals burnt off. Two-thirds of the latter through NEAT - the key difference maker. The range of NEAT increase was a huge variable (100-700cals/day) and explains why we have some folks who are "hard gainers". If you're eating 1,000 cals more but also, unconsciously , burning off 692 of those cals then...that "calculated" surplus isn't really what you thought it was. Summary So, how much of a caloric surplus is needed for bulking? Answer: it depends. For some folks, a 200-300cal increase will be plenty. For others, you may need to go 700-800. And for a select few, such as the person in the study who only gained 1.4kg (3.1lbs), 1000+ might be required. Trial & error is necessary. I'd advice starting on the lower-mid range (depending on how susceptible yo are to fat gain) and adjusting from there based on results. How much weight gain to aim for? Here you go: - For natural beginners I honestly wouldn't focus too much on how much to gain as long as you're gaining. Focus on progression in the gym and dieting fundamentals (protein intake, etc) and leave the rest for later down the road. - For non-newbie naturals an average gain of 2-3lbs/month is PLENTY. For women in the same category, go 1.5-2.5lbs/month. - For enhanced lifters you can easily justify going to 5-8lbs/month for guys, 4-5lbs/month for women. Obviously it will depend on dosages, how comfortable you are with stretch marks, etc, etc but even at this rate I don't see fat gain being a real issue. Cutting This section will build off some of the stuff from this thread with regards to the metabolic adaptations that occur when dieting that make the "calculated" weight loss inaccurate. In other words, you lose less than you expected with NEAT playing a big part again. So, how much less and why? Does metabolic compensation explain the majority of less-than-expected weight loss in obese adults during a short-term severe diet and exercise intervention? (PM for full paper) OBJECTIVE: We investigated to what extent changes in metabolic rate and composition of weight loss explained the less-than-expected weight loss in obese men and women during a diet-plus-exercise intervention. DESIGN: In all, 16 obese men and women (41 ± 9 years; body mass index (BMI) 39 ± 6 kg m(-2)) were investigated in energy balance before, after and twice during a 12-week very-low-energy diet(565-650 kcal per day) plus exercise (aerobic plus resistance training) intervention. The relative energy deficit (EDef) from baseline requirements was severe (74%-87%). Body composition was measured by deuterium dilution and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, and resting metabolic rate (RMR) was measured by indirect calorimetry. Fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) were converted into energy equivalents using constants 9.45 kcal per g FM and 1.13 kcal per g FFM. Predicted weight loss was calculated from the EDef using the '7700 kcal kg(-1) rule'. RESULTS: Changes in weight (-18.6 ± 5.0 kg), FM (-15.5 ± 4.3 kg) and FFM (-3.1 ± 1.9 kg) did not differ between genders. Measured weight loss was on average 67% of the predicted value, but ranged from 39% to 94%. Relative EDef was correlated with the decrease in RMR (R=0.70, P<0.01), and the decrease in RMR correlated with the difference between actual and expected weight loss (R=0.51, P<0.01). Changes in metabolic rate explained on average 67% of the less-than-expected weight loss, and variability in the proportion of weight lost as FM accounted for a further 5%. On average, after adjustment for changes in metabolic rate and body composition of weight lost, actual weight loss reached 90% of the predicted values. CONCLUSION: Although weight loss was 33% lower than predicted at baseline from standard energy equivalents, the majority of this differential was explained by physiological variables. Although lower-than-expected weight loss is often attributed to incomplete adherence to prescribed interventions, the influence of baseline calculation errors and metabolic downregulation should not be discounted. Brief comments on the methodology - At 565-650cals/day, all from lean meat & veggies, we're talking about a crash diet. - Protein intake was too low for both sexes (0.94g/kg for men, 0.9g/kg for women) and really needed to be at least 1.5g/kg in this context. - Not all meals were lab provided, which makes compliance issues (not doing what you were told) likely. Especially on a crash diet where we knowing bingeing is more likely. - On the plus side, these folks did undertake 4 cardio sessions & 2 lifting sessions per week. Cardio started at 30 mins per session and gradually built up to 60mins. Lifting involved full body work (shoulder press, chest press, lat pull downs, leg press, bench, squats, upright rows & ab stuff) starting at 60%1RM and working up to 80%1RM across 2 sets to begin with before moving on to 3 sets per movement. Results & discussion metabolic table.jpg The main discovery was that weight loss was 33% less than predicted. Here's why: - Resting metabolic rate (RMR) went down by 228cals/day (11%) & diet induced thermogenesis (DIT), which was only predicted not actually measured, went down by 236cals/day. That's a total of 464cals/day explaining 60% of the less than expected weight loss. - 30% of the remaining discrepancy is explained by the fact that less lean mass was lost than predicted. The calculation predicted 79% fat, 21% LBM loss but LBM loss was actually only 18.8% (3-3.1kg out of a total weight loss of 16.1-16.3kg). That's 90% of the difference between predicted & real weight loss explained. - The last 10% can be explained by lack of compliance by the subjects. Happens all the time and more likely with a study design like this. Why am I telling you all of this? To show that predicted weight loss becomes incredibly inaccurate once you're deep into your cut. It's important to be aware of that and know how to react. Some metabolic adaptations are inevitable and easily explained. RMR drops because you now weigh less = less energy needed to maintain lower body weight. DIT drops because you've been consuming less food = less energy needed for digestion. Adaptive thermogenesis is the wild card, not directly measured in this paper. Adaptive thermogenesis is responsible for the wildly varied drop in energy expenditure due primarily to a drop in NEAT. This drop can be anywhere from 10-27% depending on a myriad of factors (how long you've been dieting, how you've been dieting, activity levels, bf% change, etc). Some of this is avoidable - do not go batshit crazy with the cardio, do not have batshit crazy macros and do lift some real weight to keep your muscles. Summary So, we now know why predicting weight loss in inaccurate. What can we do about it? - Give yourself 15-25% leeway when it comes to caloric intake. Be flexible. That means being prepared to drop it by that extra amount as you get deeper into dieting. I generically recommend starting with a 20% deficit to see weekly results and rolling on from there. - Drugs will help reduce the impact of all of this. Not completely but more than good enough.

Dealing with women specifically: - You girls tend to have lower energy requirements than men and that may cause problems down the line. A typical smaller female may need 1800-2000cals to maintain. 20% deficit knocks that down to 1450-1600cals. 15-25% leeway knocks that down to an average of 1150-1300 cals. This is why women are more susceptible to eating disorders and health issues when dieting. - Health issues are coming once fat intake gets too low. Thyroid will absolutely crash if calories get too low. It's difficult to track progress over a short timeframe due to the menstrual cycle impact on water retention. My point - taking extreme action can get you girls into big trouble really quickly. My advice:

- Cardio, not taken to excess, will help tremendously. Do not rely on diet alone. - Diet breaks are your best friend - use them frequently. - Do not be afraid to reach out to someone who knows what the **** they're doing. Prevention is so much easier than treatment in this situation.

Attached Images

metabolic table.jpg (59.5 KB)

[pretty-prima-blog]

Mobile Phones with Free Laptop: Get double value

New Post has been published on https://app2chart.com/mobile-phones-with-free-laptop-get-double-value/

Mobile Phones with Free Laptop: Get double value

Mobile phones have traveled a lot to reach this point. In this journey there are so many historical mark have been made by mobile makers. In so many years every person has this device in his pocket. The basic point for which mobiles have been made i.e. for communication purpose totally got a drastic change. Now they are just like a mini computer by which we can perform any action we want. The more people get interested in this device, the more the competition among mobile companies gets hotter. There are so many marketing strategies getting use by leading mobile companies so that they can survive. Mobile phone with free laptop is one of the famous offers by these companies.

The mobile manufacturer companies like Nokia, Motorola, LG, Samsung, and Sony Ericsson are top brand companies which are making their finest move by making new technology phone. The phone like Nokia N86 8mp, Sony Ericsson W995i, Samsung Omnia 8GB are some example of market taker phones. These phones have all latest technology like high quality camera phone, DVD video player, crystal clear music, FM radio, internet, high speed data transfer, Bluetooth, GSM and EDGE technology and many more.

In Mobile phones with free laptop ,you can get a laptop of any authorized, reputed companies like Acer laptop, HP laptop and Lenovo laptop and so on. You can avail this when you opt for some deal by any service provider. the big service providers which can give you this offer are T mobile, 3 mobile, Orange, Virgin, O2, and Vodafone etc. the deals like contract deal, pay as you go deal, sim free phone deal, and clearance deal are some well flashy deal by which you can getphones with free laptop.

Purchaser always gets lured towards the free gifts and this basic weakness of users is very well known by the mobile manufacturers. In this Hi-tech world where every one wants to keep that device, that can act as an alternative of their mobile phones. So to get the smart multi featured laptop with your favorite gizmo is like gaining gold at the rate of silver. That’s why many companies are offering Laptop as a free gift with your favorite mobile.

app marketing

buy app reviews

[lightningwolf66]

Mobile Phones with Free Laptop: Get double value

New Post has been published on https://app2chart.com/mobile-phones-with-free-laptop-get-double-value/

Mobile Phones with Free Laptop: Get double value

Mobile phones have traveled a lot to reach this point. In this journey there are so many historical mark have been made by mobile makers. In so many years every person has this device in his pocket. The basic point for which mobiles have been made i.e. for communication purpose totally got a drastic change. Now they are just like a mini computer by which we can perform any action we want. The more people get interested in this device, the more the competition among mobile companies gets hotter. There are so many marketing strategies getting use by leading mobile companies so that they can survive. Mobile phone with free laptop is one of the famous offers by these companies.

The mobile manufacturer companies like Nokia, Motorola, LG, Samsung, and Sony Ericsson are top brand companies which are making their finest move by making new technology phone. The phone like Nokia N86 8mp, Sony Ericsson W995i, Samsung Omnia 8GB are some example of market taker phones. These phones have all latest technology like high quality camera phone, DVD video player, crystal clear music, FM radio, internet, high speed data transfer, Bluetooth, GSM and EDGE technology and many more.

In Mobile phones with free laptop ,you can get a laptop of any authorized, reputed companies like Acer laptop, HP laptop and Lenovo laptop and so on. You can avail this when you opt for some deal by any service provider. the big service providers which can give you this offer are T mobile, 3 mobile, Orange, Virgin, O2, and Vodafone etc. the deals like contract deal, pay as you go deal, sim free phone deal, and clearance deal are some well flashy deal by which you can getphones with free laptop.

Purchaser always gets lured towards the free gifts and this basic weakness of users is very well known by the mobile manufacturers. In this Hi-tech world where every one wants to keep that device, that can act as an alternative of their mobile phones. So to get the smart multi featured laptop with your favorite gizmo is like gaining gold at the rate of silver. That’s why many companies are offering Laptop as a free gift with your favorite mobile.

app marketing

buy app reviews

[thereaderscafenetwork-blog]

Mobile Phones with Free Laptop: Get double value

New Post has been published on https://app2chart.com/mobile-phones-with-free-laptop-get-double-value/

Mobile Phones with Free Laptop: Get double value

Mobile phones have traveled a lot to reach this point. In this journey there are so many historical mark have been made by mobile makers. In so many years every person has this device in his pocket. The basic point for which mobiles have been made i.e. for communication purpose totally got a drastic change. Now they are just like a mini computer by which we can perform any action we want. The more people get interested in this device, the more the competition among mobile companies gets hotter. There are so many marketing strategies getting use by leading mobile companies so that they can survive. Mobile phone with free laptop is one of the famous offers by these companies.

The mobile manufacturer companies like Nokia, Motorola, LG, Samsung, and Sony Ericsson are top brand companies which are making their finest move by making new technology phone. The phone like Nokia N86 8mp, Sony Ericsson W995i, Samsung Omnia 8GB are some example of market taker phones. These phones have all latest technology like high quality camera phone, DVD video player, crystal clear music, FM radio, internet, high speed data transfer, Bluetooth, GSM and EDGE technology and many more.

In Mobile phones with free laptop ,you can get a laptop of any authorized, reputed companies like Acer laptop, HP laptop and Lenovo laptop and so on. You can avail this when you opt for some deal by any service provider. the big service providers which can give you this offer are T mobile, 3 mobile, Orange, Virgin, O2, and Vodafone etc. the deals like contract deal, pay as you go deal, sim free phone deal, and clearance deal are some well flashy deal by which you can getphones with free laptop.

Purchaser always gets lured towards the free gifts and this basic weakness of users is very well known by the mobile manufacturers. In this Hi-tech world where every one wants to keep that device, that can act as an alternative of their mobile phones. So to get the smart multi featured laptop with your favorite gizmo is like gaining gold at the rate of silver. That’s why many companies are offering Laptop as a free gift with your favorite mobile.

app marketing

buy app reviews

[zuranimukherjeenudexn]

Mobile Phones with Free Laptop: Get double value

New Post has been published on https://app2chart.com/mobile-phones-with-free-laptop-get-double-value/

Mobile Phones with Free Laptop: Get double value

Mobile phones have traveled a lot to reach this point. In this journey there are so many historical mark have been made by mobile makers. In so many years every person has this device in his pocket. The basic point for which mobiles have been made i.e. for communication purpose totally got a drastic change. Now they are just like a mini computer by which we can perform any action we want. The more people get interested in this device, the more the competition among mobile companies gets hotter. There are so many marketing strategies getting use by leading mobile companies so that they can survive. Mobile phone with free laptop is one of the famous offers by these companies.

The mobile manufacturer companies like Nokia, Motorola, LG, Samsung, and Sony Ericsson are top brand companies which are making their finest move by making new technology phone. The phone like Nokia N86 8mp, Sony Ericsson W995i, Samsung Omnia 8GB are some example of market taker phones. These phones have all latest technology like high quality camera phone, DVD video player, crystal clear music, FM radio, internet, high speed data transfer, Bluetooth, GSM and EDGE technology and many more.

In Mobile phones with free laptop ,you can get a laptop of any authorized, reputed companies like Acer laptop, HP laptop and Lenovo laptop and so on. You can avail this when you opt for some deal by any service provider. the big service providers which can give you this offer are T mobile, 3 mobile, Orange, Virgin, O2, and Vodafone etc. the deals like contract deal, pay as you go deal, sim free phone deal, and clearance deal are some well flashy deal by which you can getphones with free laptop.

Purchaser always gets lured towards the free gifts and this basic weakness of users is very well known by the mobile manufacturers. In this Hi-tech world where every one wants to keep that device, that can act as an alternative of their mobile phones. So to get the smart multi featured laptop with your favorite gizmo is like gaining gold at the rate of silver. That’s why many companies are offering Laptop as a free gift with your favorite mobile.

app marketing

buy app reviews