#fumbling with metaphorical and non-literal language.
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
i kind of hate to say it because i feel like i'll get pushback for it,,, but i kind of feel like if you're going to be making informational posts about autism online you do need to be reading actual autism research and literature. at least some of the times. like you can't just make things up and then present them as fact.
#N posts stuff#i guess as a defense the post i'm vaguing about doesn't actually attempt to Completely redefine a trait; just partially redefine it#but 'literal interpretation' in autism does Not refer to ambiguity in question answering. it does mean literal interpretation#very notably if you read Anything about autistic kids you'll see examples of them#fumbling with metaphorical and non-literal language.#a girl being told she can 'walk on ahead' and confusedly trying to flip herself upside down to Walk On Her Head#a kid being taught how to use a knife being told he should curl his fingers in 'like a cat's paw' and getting mad because#he has human hands and Not cat's paws.#kid being told he wears his heart on his sleeve and angrily arguing that his heart wouldn't beat properly outside of his chest#you can't just say 'well i loved wordplay so they must mean something else when they talk about this' they don't.#i notice a lot of that kind of. flattening? of autistic traits online and it can start to get a little frustrating#like dont' get me wrong i don't exactly hold the psychiatric field in high esteem but i feel like if you're using their diagnostic#terminology you kind of Have to play in the diagnostic criteria that those terms define. you can't just rewrite it entirely#the psychiatric field still exists so their framework is what you have to work under if you're using their terms#don't misunderstand me i'm not protesting against self-diagnosis or anything like that. i was self-diagnosed for years before i got my DX#but like. you also can't just rewrite the diagnostic criteria because you want to make a certain argument.#at a certain point you just sound incredibly misinformed. or like you're just outright lying...#or at least trying too hard to extrapolate your personal experience to the broader community in ways that Don't Fit.#yeah the diagnostic criteria might be in some ways inaccurate and biased but. you can't really just Make Up your own and claim#that's what they Really Meant all along. it doesn't make sense.#<- guy being too pedantic for its own good but. i mean. i don't know what we expected.
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
I don’t really like the label ‘trans masc’ but I use it, because that’s the label for people who are like me, and I’m building community with people who are like me. I don’t know how I feel about ‘transandrophobia’ as a term, but it doesn’t matter: it’s a word, a symbol for something real, and its usefulness matters more.
I don’t know how to play this game of boundaries, this precision and absolutes of language. I call myself non-binary, trans masc, ftm, a trans man, a non-binary trans masc, bigender, a man who is a woman, a woman who is a man, I relate to the kinds of trans people who call themselves a ‘butch dyke trans masc’ even though I’m not one, I once read a book that used the phrase ‘trans male’ I was thrilled to see myself in it.
In real life, I fumble over my words. I am a poet who has to say, ‘if you know what I mean’ a lot, I am a poet because words are imprecise and poetry loves that imprecision.
I love that, though. Don’t we all? All the metaphors we use just to finish with ‘if you know what I mean’ and then the other person says, ‘I know what you mean’ and they use their own metaphors! And then you have more—more, and more, and more language, concepts, ideas, lit up in your brain, helping you churn through and piece together the world.
Gender is not all the words in me, and not all the stories that make me up. I don’t need to see myself one-to-one in everything; I only find myself alienated by others when they tell me that there *are* these absolutes. That a trans man can only be 100 percent a man and nothing else, or when they define the experiences of trans masculinity that are directly different than my own, and declare those essential. And then, then, I feel as though I sit in some kind of no-man’s land, staring at signs and names for places I yearn for but the door has been shut against me.
Sometimes people have told me, apologetically, ‘I relate to these words, these feelings you describe, some aspect of this experience even though it is not literally mine,’ and I hate that we’ve made that an apology. I want to tell them, please, my life is open source, please, human pain and joy is so vast, of course we are going to find ourselves in the almosts of other people. I want to always find myself in the almosts of other people, that’s how we talk to each other.
I don’t have to like a word to see myself in its definition, I don’t have to pick apart a word to hold it accountable to some ‘essentialized’ definition just to find it a useful descriptor. Language is so much more than the individual components of words themselves.
Sometimes I come up with my own words. Words I like. And you may not like them. But maybe you’ll use them too, because you’ll see yourself in them. And maybe we won’t even agree exactly on what these words mean. But we’ll say: I get what you mean. I get what you mean. And if we get what each other means—then we’ve built something real.
17 notes
·
View notes